Long-Term Effects of Training Accompanying Myofascial Self-Massage Using a Blackroll^® on Mechanical and Movement Efficiency in Recreational Cyclists

Background: Foam rolling has become an increasingly popular self-myofascial release (SMR) technique among athletes to prevent injuries, improve recovery, and increase athletic performance. This study investigated how SMR improves mechanical and movement efficiency in recreational road cyclists. Methods: We conducted an exploratory randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the effects of SMR using a foam roller on biomechanical and physiological performance parameters over a six-month period. A total of 32 male participants, aged 26–57 years, with a mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of 24.0 kg/m² (SD = 2.2), were randomly assigned to either an intervention group (n = 16), which incorporated a standardized SMR program into their post-exercise recovery, or a control group (n = 16), which followed the same cycling protocol without SMR. The training program included heart rate-controlled strength endurance intervals. As the primary target, the variables we investigated included torque effectiveness, leg force symmetry, and pedal smoothness. Secondary measurements included submaximal oxygen uptake (VO₂) as well as bioelectrical variables, which we analyzed using classic, repeated-measures ANOVA models and descriptive statistical methods. Results: The analysis revealed significant interaction effects in favor of the intervention group for torque effectiveness (η²_p = 0.434), leg strength symmetry (η²_p = 0.303), and pedal smoothness (η²_p = 0.993). No significant group × time interactions were found for submaximal VO₂ or bioelectrical parameters. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that foam rolling may serve as an effective adjunct to endurance training by enhancing functional neuromuscular performance in cyclists, particularly in torque control and pedal coordination. Its impact on aerobic efficiency and muscle composition appears to be minimal. The results support theoretical models that attribute SMR benefits to proprioceptive, circulatory, and neuromuscular mechanisms rather than structural tissue adaptations.