Next Article in Journal
Chemical Reactivity in Microheterogeneous Media
Next Article in Special Issue
Possible Role of Vesicles on Metallocatalytic Reduction Reaction of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-Dimethylfuran
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Thiazolidinedione Compound Library
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Structured Supports and Catalysts: Design, Preparation, and Applications

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
Compounds 2022, 2(3), 191-192; https://doi.org/10.3390/compounds2030014
Submission received: 20 June 2022 / Accepted: 8 July 2022 / Published: 15 July 2022
In the field of industrial chemistry, catalysts play a fundamental role in determining the ability of chemical production processes to reach and improve productivity targets. In addition to the chemical composition, several factors can represent critical parameters in determining the performance of catalysts, including the geometric shape and thermal conductivity of the constituent materials [1]. The use of structured supports, on which active phases are deposited to obtain structured catalysts, enables the management of transport phenomena, optimizing the thermal profiles and the mass transfer [2]. The design of structured catalysts is directly related to the process in which they are to be used; when choosing the structure, the operating temperatures and pressure, the flow regime, and the thermal conductivity of the material must be considered [3]. Similarly, the choice of the catalytic coating to be applied onto the structure depends on chemical reactions of the process, just as the deposition technique depends on the characteristics of the surface of the structure.
The most commonly used structures in catalysis are open cell foams and honeycomb monoliths. The foams are characterized by a three-dimensional array of empty polygons, and can be classified according to porosity and relative density [4]; both metallic and ceramic are available, and can be obtained by replication [5] or bubble generation methods [6]. The honeycomb monoliths are characterized by channels, which can have different geometries and can be of two types: flow-through, in which every channel is open on both sides; or wall-flow, in which the channels are alternatively closed, and the stream is forced to flow through the porous walls. The most commonly used preparation technique is extrusion; however, the rolling and piling of crimped foils has also been proposed [7]. The recent developments in additive manufacturing techniques have greatly expanded the opportunities. Due to 3D printing, monolithic honeycomb and foam structures can be easily obtained; in addition, mixed structures can be easily created, the geometry of which can be established according to the process needs [8].
Among the deposition techniques of the active phases, washcoating is widely used [9]; however, in the case of high-density porous structures, the risk of occlusion suggests the use of alternative techniques [10]. In the latter case, in addition to the classic impregnation, modified-chemical conversion coating [10], electrodeposition [11], chemical vapor deposition [12], and atomic layer deposition [13] can be used.
Structured catalysts find applications in several processes; the thermal profiles of exothermic and endothermic catalytic reaction beds can be easily optimized with conductive structures, achieving benefits both on conversions and on the process energy demand [14,15]. The integration between structure and heating can be easily realized in structured heating elements, to eliminate the resistance to heat transfer [16]. In the context of process electrification, SiC material appears to be the best choice for designing structures that can operate at currents and voltages and be used safely [17]; moreover, the microwave susceptibility of SiC makes it an ideal candidate for the design of microwave-assisted catalyzed processes [18]. The replacement of the traditional external heat source with induced heating inside the catalyst is an extremely attractive topic; the intensification of the processes is therefore achieved through the strong reduction in reactor volume, and the use of electricity as a “green” energy carrier.
The use of additive techniques and the integration of heating with structures can revolutionize catalyzed production processes and have a tremendous positive environmental impact. Additionally, future research should point in this direction. However, some paradigms must be changed, the catalyst design must be “on demand”, calibrated to the process needs, optimized structured geometries and new conductive materials must be implemented, new active phase deposition techniques must be developed, and in some cases, the production plants will have to be redesigned. Significant investments are needed, both in the economy and research; this Special Issue aims to provide an overview of the state of the art and propose future developments in the realization of structured supports and catalytic coatings for the structured catalysts production, for environmental applications and in production processes.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Palma, V.; Ruocco, C.; Martino, M.; Barba, D.; Meloni, E. Chapter 14—General Catalyst-Related Issues. In Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes; Figoli, A., Li, Y., Basile, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 303–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Della Torre, A.; Lucci, F.; Montenegro, G.; Onorati, A.; Dimopoulos Eggenschwiler, P.; Tronconi, E.; Groppi, G. CFD modeling of catalytic reactions in open-cell foam substrates. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2016, 92, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Palma, V.; Pisano, D.; Martino, M.; Ricca, A.; Ciambelli, P. High thermal conductivity structured carriers for catalytic processes intensification. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2015, 43, 2047–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ho, P.H.; Ambrosetti, M.; Groppi, G.; Tronconi, E.; Jaroszewicz, J.; Ospitali, F.; Rodríguez-Castellon, E.; Fornasari, G.; Vaccari, A.; Benito, P. One-step electrodeposition of Pd-CeO2 on high pore density foams for environmental catalytic processes. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 4678–4689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Elizondo Luna, E.M.; Barari, F.; Woolley, R.; Goodall, R. Casting protocols for the production of open cell aluminum foams by the replication technique and the effect on porosity. J. Vis. Exp. 2014, 94, 52268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Thorat, R.; Bruining, H. Foam Flow Experiments. I. Estimation of the Bubble Generation-Coalescence Function. Transp. Porous Med. 2016, 112, 53–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. García-Moncada, N.; Groppi, G.; Beretta, A.; Romero-Sarria, F.; Odriozola, J.A. Metal Micro-Monoliths for the Kinetic Study and the Intensification of the Water Gas Shift Reaction. Catalysts 2018, 8, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Parra-Cabrera, C.; Achille, C.; Kuhn, S.; Ameloot, R. 3D printing in chemical engineering and catalytic technology: Structured catalysts, mixers and reactors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 209–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cristiani, C.; Visconti, C.G.; Finocchio, E.; Gallo Stampino, P.; Forzatti, P. Towards the rationalization of the washcoating process conditions. Catal. Today 2009, 147, S24–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Palma, V.; Goodall, R.; Thompson, A.; Ruocco, C.; Renda, S.; Leach, R.; Martino, M. Ceria-coated replicated aluminium sponges as catalysts for the CO-water gas shift process. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 12158–12168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ho, P.H.; Sanghez de Luna, G.; Poggi, A.; Nota, M.; Rodríguez-Castellón, E.; Fornasari, G.; Vaccari, A.; Benito, P. Ru–CeO2 and Ni–CeO2 Coated on Open-Cell Metallic Foams by Electrodeposition for the CO2 Methanation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 6730–6741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Faust, M.; Dinkel, M.; Bruns, M.; Brase, S.; Seipenbusch, M. Support Effect on the Water Gas Shift Activity of Chemical Vapor Deposition-Tailored-Pt/TiO2 Catalysts. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 3194–3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. O’Neill, B.J.; Jackson, D.H.K.; Lee, J.; Canlas, C.; Stair, P.C.; Marshall, C.L.; Elam, J.W.; Kuech, T.F.; Dumesic, J.A.; Huber, G.W. Catalyst Design with Atomic Layer Deposition. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1804–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Palma, V.; Pisano, D.; Martino, M. CFD modeling of the influence of carrier thermal conductivity for structured catalysts in the WGS reaction. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018, 178, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Palma, V.; Ricca, A.; Martino, M.; Meloni, E. Innovative structured catalytic systems for methane steam reforming intensification. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2017, 120, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Renda, S.; Cortese, M.; Iervolino, G.; Martino, M.; Meloni, E.; Palma, V. Electrically driven SiC-based structured catalysts for intensified reforming processes. Catal. Today 2022, 383, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ambrosetti, M.; Beretta, A.; Groppi, G.; Tronconi, E. A Numerical Investigation of Electrically-Heated Methane Steam Reforming over Structured Catalysts. Front. Chem. Eng. 2021, 3, 747636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meloni, E.; Martino, M.; Ricca, A.; Palma, V. Ultracompact methane steam reforming reactor based on microwaves susceptible structured catalysts for distributed hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 13729–13747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martino, M. Structured Supports and Catalysts: Design, Preparation, and Applications. Compounds 2022, 2, 191-192. https://doi.org/10.3390/compounds2030014

AMA Style

Martino M. Structured Supports and Catalysts: Design, Preparation, and Applications. Compounds. 2022; 2(3):191-192. https://doi.org/10.3390/compounds2030014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martino, Marco. 2022. "Structured Supports and Catalysts: Design, Preparation, and Applications" Compounds 2, no. 3: 191-192. https://doi.org/10.3390/compounds2030014

APA Style

Martino, M. (2022). Structured Supports and Catalysts: Design, Preparation, and Applications. Compounds, 2(3), 191-192. https://doi.org/10.3390/compounds2030014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop