Next Article in Journal
Correction: Patching, S.G. Spermidine Binding to the Acetinobacter baumannii Efflux Protein AceI Observed by Near-UV Synchrotron Radiation Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy. Radiation 2022, 2, 228–233
Previous Article in Journal
Effects Induced in Human Cells and Tissues by Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation: A Review of Vibrational Spectroscopy Contributions
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Assessment of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Predicting Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) Response in Unresectable Breast Cancer

by Mateusz Bielecki 1,2,*, Khadijeh Saednia 1, Fang-I Lu 3, Shely Kagan 1, Danny Vesprini 1,4, Katarzyna J. Jerzak 5, Roberto Salgado 6, Raffi Karshafian 2,7 and William T. Tran 1,4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Submission received: 26 February 2025 / Revised: 26 March 2025 / Accepted: 30 March 2025 / Published: 2 April 2025

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors present a pilot study investigating the computational analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) to predict stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) response in patients with inoperable breast cancer (BC). Clinical and spatial features were collected and analyzed using machine learning (ML) classifiers, including K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB), to predict SABR response. Models were evaluated using receiver operator characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) analysis. The highest-performing model using computationally derived graph features showed an AUC of 0.92, while the highest clinical model showed an AUC of 0.62 within unseen test sets. The authors conclude that spatial TIL models demonstrate strong potential for predicting SABR response in inoperable breast cancer. TILs indicate a higher independent predictive performance than clinical features alone.

The study is interesting, original, and well-conducted. I have nothing else to add. I believe it can be accepted for publication in your journal.

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

It is a very elegant and sophisticated study.

I have one question. What is the additional cost involved in this testing?

Does it require the level of sophistication in ML and AI that your group has? How reproducible and scalable will it be?

Because you will be able to do better patient selection, will it eventually reduce cost? You will not be treating patients who will not benefit from radiation.

Author Response

Please see attachement

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This study describes the combination of images and TILs infiltration along with machine learning to predict responses to radiotherapy in patients with inoperable breast tumors. The response was evaluated in the context of clinical and graph features. I have a few comments to improve the manuscript.

For me, it was not clear if the identification of lymphocytes in the tumors was appropriately performed. The methodology has been used in another study or is widely used? If not, the authors reinforce their findings with histological analysis using monoclonal antibodies reactive to specific markers of lymphocytes?

Table 1 is confusing. I suggest that the two experiments are classified independently from each other in all parameters, including  median age, sex, etc.

The Y axis in Figure 3 is very difficult to read.

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have answered all my concerns.

Back to TopTop