Collaborative Conservation by Botanical Gardens: Unique Opportunities for Local to Global Impacts
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Collaborative Conservation
1.2. Botanical Gardens and Conservation
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. EcoFlora
2.2. Central Arizona Conservation Alliance
- Protect and Connect—Ensure a robust network of habitat blocks and connections to sustain native plant and animal communities, provide opportunities for recreation, support clean air and water resources, and improve resilience to drought, extreme heat, and flooding.
- Sustain and Restore—Identify and engage best practices in land management and restoration to sustain and enhance native biodiversity, positive recreational experiences, and socio-economic benefits connected with the Sonoran Desert.
- Love and Support—Build champions and constituency of support and action for Sonoran Desert conservation by raising awareness and connecting people with nature.
- Coordinate and Elevate—Build upon the CAZCA foundation to ensure and amplify regional open space collaboration, coordination, management, and conservation successes.
2.3. Great Milkweed Grow Out
2.4. Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species Conservation
3. Results
3.1. EcoFlora
3.2. Central Arizona Conservation Alliance
3.3. Great Milkweed Grow Out
3.4. Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species Conservation
4. Discussion
4.1. EcoFlora
4.2. Central Arizona Conservation Alliance
4.3. Great Milkweed Grow Out
4.4. Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species Conservation
4.5. Challenges to Collaboration
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. CAZCA Partners and Collaborators in 2018
Appendix B. List of Participating Organizations in the Stakeholder Consultation Meetings for the Conservation Opportunity Area Identification
References
- Wilkins, K.; Pejchar, L.; Carroll, S.L.; Jones, M.S.; Walker, S.E.; Shinbrot, X.A.; Huayhuaca, C.; Fernández-Giménez, M.E.; Reid, R.S. Collaborative Conservation in the United States: A Review of Motivations, Goals, and Outcomes. Biol. Conserv. 2021, 259, 109165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berkes, F.; Colding, J.; Folke, C. Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10, 1251–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brick, P.; Snow, D.; Bates, S.F.; Kemmis, D. (Eds.) Across the Great Divide: Explorations in Collaborative Conservation and the American West; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Knight, R.L.; White, C. (Eds.) Conservation for a New Generation: Redefining Natural Resources Management; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Nelson, F.; Parrish, J. Developing New Models for Collaboration in Conservation. Available online: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/developing_new_models_for_collaboration_in_conservation (accessed on 14 March 2022).
- Franks, J.R.; Emery, S.B. Incentivising Collaborative Conservation: Lessons from Existing Environmental Stewardship Scheme Options. Land Use Policy 2013, 30, 847–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wyborn, C.; Bixler, R.P. Collaboration and Nested Environmental Governance: Scale Dependency, Scale Framing, and Cross-Scale Interactions in Collaborative Conservation. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 123, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cox, M.; Arnold, G.; Tomás, S.V. A Review of Design Principles for Community-Based Natural Resource Management. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Kania, J.; Kramer, M. Collective Impact. Available online: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/collective_impact (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Jackson, P.W.; Bridge, B.; Dennis, F.; Leadlay, E.; Hobson, C.; Holland, F.; Pendry, T.; Skilton, J.; Sutherland, L.; Willison, J.; et al. An International Review of the Ex Situ Plant Collections of the Botanic Gardens of the World. Bot. Gard. Conserv. News 2001, 3, 22–33. [Google Scholar]
- Maunder, M.; Higgens, S.; Culham, A. The Effectiveness of Botanic Garden Collections in Supporting Plant Conservation: A European Case Study. Biodivers. Conserv. 2001, 10, 383–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mounce, R.; Smith, P.; Brockington, S. Ex Situ Conservation of Plant Diversity in the World’s Botanic Gardens. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 795–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; Sun, W. The Role of Botanical Gardens in Scientific Research, Conservation, and Citizen Science. Plant Divers. 2018, 40, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Donnell, K.; Sharrock, S. The Contribution of Botanic Gardens to Ex Situ Conservation through Seed Banking. Plant Divers. 2017, 39, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breman, E.; Ballesteros, D.; Castillo-Lorenzo, E.; Cockel, C.; Dickie, J.; Faruk, A.; O’Donnell, K.; Offord, C.A.; Pironon, S.; Sharrock, S.; et al. Plant Diversity Conservation Challenges and Prospects—The Perspective of Botanic Gardens and the Millennium Seed Bank. Plants 2021, 10, 2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Donaldson, J.S. Botanic Gardens Science for Conservation and Global Change. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14, 608–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Westwood, M.; Cavender, N.; Meyer, A.; Smith, P. Botanic Garden Solutions to the Plant Extinction Crisis. Plants People Planet 2021, 3, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Cannon, C.H.; Hu, H. Tropical Botanical Gardens: At the in Situ Ecosystem Management Frontier. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14, 584–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cannon, C.H.; Kua, C.-S. Botanic Gardens Should Lead the Way to Create a “Garden Earth” in the Anthropocene. Plant Divers. 2017, 39, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, H.; Chen, J. Educational and Enjoyment Benefits of Visitor Education Centers at Botanical Gardens. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 149, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sellmann, D.; Bogner, F.X. Climate Change Education: Quantitatively Assessing the Impact of a Botanical Garden as an Informal Learning Environment. Environ. Educ. Res. 2013, 19, 415–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahtz, A.W. Impact of Environmental Education Classes at Missouri Botanical Garden on Attitude and Knowledge Change of Elementary School Children. HortTechnology 1995, 5, 338–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zelenika, I.; Moreau, T.; Lane, O.; Zhao, J. Sustainability Education in a Botanical Garden Promotes Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes and Willingness to Act. Environ. Educ. Res. 2018, 24, 1581–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Havens, K.; Vitt, P.; Masi, S. Citizen Science on a Local Scale: The Plants of Concern Program. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2012, 10, 321–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raschke, A.B.; Davis, J.; Quiroz, A. The Central Arizona Conservation Alliance Programs: Use of Social Media and App-Supported Community Science for Landscape-Scale Habitat Restoration, Governance Support, and Community Resilience-Building. Land 2022, 11, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desert Botanical Garden Living Collections. Available online: https://livingcollections.org/dbg/Home.aspx (accessed on 12 March 2022).
- Desert Botanical Garden. Strategic Plan: 2019–2023; Desert Botanical Garden: Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Alcock, I.; White, M.P.; Pahl, S.; Duarte-Davidson, R.; Fleming, L.E. Associations between Pro-Environmental Behaviour and Neighbourhood Nature, Nature Visit Frequency and Nature Appreciation: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Survey in England. Environ. Int. 2020, 136, 105441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Z.; He, C.; Wu, J. The Relationship between Habitat Loss and Fragmentation during Urbanization: An Empirical Evaluation from 16 World Cities. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- MAG Fast Facts—Administration. Available online: https://azmag.gov/About-Us/Divisions/Administration-Division/MAG-Fast-Facts-Administration (accessed on 29 December 2021).
- Parkes, M.W.; Morrison, K.E.; Bunch, M.J.; Hallström, L.K.; Neudoerffer, R.C.; Venema, H.D.; Waltner-Toews, D. Towards Integrated Governance for Water, Health and Social–Ecological Systems: The Watershed Governance Prism. Glob. Environ. Change 2010, 20, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beute, S.; Arndt, L. The Regional Open Space Strategy for Maricopa County 2018. Beute, S., Arndt, L., Eds.; In The Regional Open Space Strategy for Maricopa County; Central Arizona Conservation Alliance: Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Schultz, C.B.; Brown, L.M.; Pelton, E.; Crone, E.E. Citizen Science Monitoring Demonstrates Dramatic Declines of Monarch Butterflies in Western North America. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 214, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thogmartin, W.E.; Wiederholt, R.; Oberhauser, K.; Drum, R.G.; Diffendorfer, J.E.; Altizer, S.; Taylor, O.R.; Pleasants, J.; Semmens, D.; Semmens, B.; et al. Monarch Butterfly Population Decline in North America: Identifying the Threatening Processes. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2017, 4, 170760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pelton, E.M.; Schultz, C.B.; Jepsen, S.J.; Black, S.H.; Crone, E.E. Western Monarch Population Plummets: Status, Probable Causes, and Recommended Conservation Actions. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crone, E.E.; Pelton, E.M.; Brown, L.M.; Thomas, C.C.; Schultz, C.B. Why Are Monarch Butterflies Declining in the West? Understanding the Importance of Multiple Correlated Drivers. Ecol. Appl. 2019, 29, e01975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brower, L.P. Chemical Defence in Butterflies. In The Biology of Butterflies; Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 109–134. [Google Scholar]
- Brower, L.P.; Fink, L.S.; Walford, P. Fueling the Fall Migration of the Monarch Butterfly. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2006, 46, 1123–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lukens, L.; Kasten, K.; Stenoien, C.; Cariveau, A.; Caldwell, W.; Oberhauser, K. Monarch Habitat in Conservation Grasslands. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 8, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cutting, B.T.; Tallamy, D.W. An Evaluation of Butterfly Gardens for Restoring Habitat for the Monarch Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Danaidae). Environ. Entomol. 2015, 44, 1328–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baker, A.M.; Potter, D.A. Colonization and Usage of Eight Milkweed (Asclepias) Species by Monarch Butterflies and Bees in Urban Garden Settings. J. Insect Conserv. 2018, 22, 405–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morris, G.M.; Kline, C.; Morris, S.M. Status of Danaus Plexippus Population in Arizona. lepi 2015, 69, 91–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pegram, K.V.; Melkonoff, N.A. Assessing Preference and Survival of Danaus Plexippus on Two Western Species of Asclepias. J. Insect Conserv. 2020, 24, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knapp, W.M.; Frances, A.; Noss, R.; Naczi, R.F.C.; Weakley, A.; Gann, G.D.; Baldwin, B.G.; Miller, J.; McIntyre, P.; Mishler, B.D.; et al. Vascular Plant Extinction in the Continental United States and Canada. Conserv. Biol. 2021, 35, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plant Conservation Alliance. National Seed Strategy for Rehabilitation and Restoration: Making Progress 2018; Plant Conservation Alliance: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Whigham, D.F. Conserving Our Native Orchid Heritage—The What, How and WHen Behind the North American Orchid Conservation Center. Nativ. Orchid. Conf. J. 2012, 9, 24–31. [Google Scholar]
- Coleman, R.A. The Wild Orchids of Arizona and New Mexico. Available online: https://www.amazon.com/Wild-Orchids-Arizona-New-Mexico/dp/0801439507 (accessed on 22 July 2022).
- Managing Semi-Arid Watersheds: Watershed Basics—Public Land Management and Land Ownership in Arizona. Available online: https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/boise/AWAE/labs/awae_flagstaff/watersheds/basics/management.html (accessed on 15 July 2022).
- Viglianisi, F.M.; Sabella, G. Biodiversity, Environmental Education and Social Media. Biodivers. J. 2011, 2, 195–200. [Google Scholar]
- Di Minin, E.; Tenkanen, H.; Toivonen, T. Prospects and Challenges for Social Media Data in Conservation Science. Front. Environ. Sci. 2015, 3, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frigerio, D.; Richter, A.; Per, E.; Pruse, B.; Vohland, K. Citizen Science in the Natural Sciences. In The Science of Citizen Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 79–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhodes, C.J. Pollinator Decline—An Ecological Calamity in the Making? Sci. Prog. 2018, 101, 121–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, D.L.; Grames, E.M.; Forister, M.L.; Berenbaum, M.R.; Stopak, D. Insect Decline in the Anthropocene: Death by a Thousand Cuts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2023989118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plant Conservation Alliance. National Seed Strategy for Rehabilitation and Restoration: Progress Report 2015–2020; Plant Conservation Alliance: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Desert Refuge: Monarchs and Milkweeds in Arizona. USA National Phenology Network. Available online: https://www.usanpn.org/nn/desertrefuge (accessed on 17 February 2022).
- Monarch Joint Venture. Monarch Conservation Implementation Plan 2021; Monarch Joint Venture: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Arizona Monarch Collaborative. Available online: https://www.azmonarchcollaborative.com/ (accessed on 9 March 2022).
- Cotten, T.; Devos, J.; Keleher, C.; Lehr, S.; Marcum, S.; Miner, K.; Newmark, J.; Palmeri, D.; Sallabanks, R.; Bustos, M.U. Western Monarch Butterfly Conservation Plan; Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies: Boise, ID, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Arizona Monarch Collaborative—Resources. Available online: https://www.azmonarchcollaborative.com/resources (accessed on 22 July 2022).
- Swarts, N.; Dixon, K. Conservation Methods for Terrestrial Orchids; J. Ross Publishing: Plantation, FL, USA, 2017; ISBN 978-1-60427-123-2. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, M.F.J.; Suckling, K.F.; Rachlinski, J.J. The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis. BioScience 2005, 55, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goettsch, B.; Hilton-Taylor, C.; Cruz-Piñón, G.; Duffy, J.P.; Frances, A.; Hernández, H.M.; Inger, R.; Pollock, C.; Schipper, J.; Superina, M.; et al. High Proportion of Cactus Species Threatened with Extinction. Nat. Plants 2015, 1, 15142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/en (accessed on 15 July 2022).
- Gruber, J.S. Key Principles of Community-Based Natural Resource Management: A Synthesis and Interpretation of Identified Effective Approaches for Managing the Commons. Environ. Manag. 2010, 45, 52–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gavin, M.C.; McCarter, J.; Berkes, F.; Mead, A.T.P.; Sterling, E.J.; Tang, R.; Turner, N.J. Effective Biodiversity Conservation Requires Dynamic, Pluralistic, Partnership-Based Approaches. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansell, C.; Gash, A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2008, 18, 543–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lashley, J. Solving Urban Conservation Issues through Botanic Garden Functions. Master’s Thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA, 2012; p. 43. [Google Scholar]
- Krishnan, S.; Novy, A. The Role of Botanic Gardens in the Twenty-First Century. CAB Rev. 2016, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balding, M.; Williams, K.J.H. Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2016, 30, 1192–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borders, B.; Lee-Mäder, E. A Conservation Practitioner’s Guide 2014; The Xerces Society: Portland, OR, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Hanson, N.; Ross-Davis, A.L.; Davis, A.S. Growth and Survival of Two Western Milkweed Species: Effects of Container Volume and Fertilizer Rate. HortTechnology 2017, 27, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topping, M.L.; Dumroese, R.K.; Pinto, J.R. Successfully Storing Milkweed Taproots for Habitat Restoration. NPJ 2019, 20, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steger, C.; Klein, J.A.; Reid, R.S.; Lavorel, S.; Tucker, C.; Hopping, K.A.; Marchant, R.; Teel, T.; Cuni-Sanchez, A.; Dorji, T.; et al. Science with Society: Evidence-Based Guidance for Best Practices in Environmental Transdisciplinary Work. Glob. Environ. Change 2021, 68, 102240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fotiadis, A.; Polyzos, S.; Huan, T.-C.T.C. The Good, the Bad and the Ugly on COVID-19 Tourism Recovery. Ann. Tour. Res. 2021, 87, 103117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- The ICBOs and Allies Workgroup Understanding the Impact of Equitable Collaborations between Science Institutions and Community-Based Organizations: Improving Science through Community-Led Research. BioScience 2022, 72, 585–600. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Missouri Botanical Garden: Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Information 2014; Mayer Hoffman McCann: St. Louis, MI, USA, 2014.
- The Atlanta Botanical Garden Inc.: Financial Statements 2019; Smith & Howard: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2019.
- Desert Botanical Garden Inc. and Affiliates: Consolidated Financial Statements 2020; Desert Botanical Garden: Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2020.
- Wright, A.J.; Veríssimo, D.; Pilfold, K.; Parsons, E.C.M.; Ventre, K.; Cousins, J.; Jefferson, R.; Koldewey, H.; Llewellyn, F.; McKinley, E. Competitive Outreach in the 21st Century: Why We Need Conservation Marketing. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2015, 115, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Program/Project Name | Conservation Focus | Scale | No. of Collaborators | Types of Partner Organizations |
---|---|---|---|---|
EcoFlora | Urban biodiversity, alleviating plant invisibility, open-access data and information | Local—Metro Phoenix area | 40+ | Non-profits, academic, municipal agencies, societies, professional scientists, local experts, community members |
CAZCA | Habitat connectivity, restoration, outreach, collaborative coordination | Regional—Maricopa County and associated HUC watersheds | 70+ | Federal, state and municipal agencies, non-profits, academic institutions, industry |
GMGO | Pollinators, native plant materials, research, outreach | State | 60+ | Federal and state agencies, non-profits, academic institutions, community members, K-12 schools |
Endangered Species Plant Conservation | Rare, threatened, and endangered plant conservation ex situ and in situ | International | 70+ | Federal and state agencies, IUCN, other botanical research institutions |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Raschke, A.B.; Pegram, K.V.; Melkonoff, N.A.; Davis, J.; Blackwell, S.A. Collaborative Conservation by Botanical Gardens: Unique Opportunities for Local to Global Impacts. J. Zool. Bot. Gard. 2022, 3, 463-487. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg3030035
Raschke AB, Pegram KV, Melkonoff NA, Davis J, Blackwell SA. Collaborative Conservation by Botanical Gardens: Unique Opportunities for Local to Global Impacts. Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens. 2022; 3(3):463-487. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg3030035
Chicago/Turabian StyleRaschke, Aireona B., Kimberly V. Pegram, Natalie A. Melkonoff, Jeny Davis, and Steven A. Blackwell. 2022. "Collaborative Conservation by Botanical Gardens: Unique Opportunities for Local to Global Impacts" Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens 3, no. 3: 463-487. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg3030035
APA StyleRaschke, A. B., Pegram, K. V., Melkonoff, N. A., Davis, J., & Blackwell, S. A. (2022). Collaborative Conservation by Botanical Gardens: Unique Opportunities for Local to Global Impacts. Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens, 3(3), 463-487. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg3030035