Correction: Patria et al. (2025). “(Don’t) Stop the Rising Oil Price”: Mediatization, Digital Discourse, and Fuel Price Controversies in Indonesian Online Media. Journalism and Media, 6(3), 124

There was an error in the original publication (Patria et al., 2025). The authors made a mistake in how they summarized and referenced two works.

A correction has been made to Section 3. Materials and Methods, Subsection 3.1. Discourse Network Analysis, Paragraph 2.

Corrected paragraph:

Wallaschek et al. (2020) conducted a discourse network analysis of the term solidarity in four major German newspapers (2008–2017), examining how various actors invoked solidarity across issues such as the Euro crisis, migration, political protest, and welfare, and distinguishing between solidarity among (internal bonds) and solidarity with (support for external groups). Bhattacharya (2020) applied discourse network analysis to the German Bundestag, comparing plenary speeches and MPs’ Explanations of Vote (EoVs) to show how party leaders’ control over speaking opportunities affects visible party unity, while internal dissent can emerge through the EoV format. These studies demonstrate how discourse network analysis can capture contested political narratives in both media and parliamentary arenas.

The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.