Next Article in Journal
Who Is Gaining, Who Is Losing? Examining Benefit Sharing Mechanism (BSM) under REDD+ in India
Previous Article in Journal
Relationships between the Content of C, N, P and Their Stoichiometry in the Soils of Selected Reserves of the Białowieża Primeval Forest
 
 
Please note that, as of 4 December 2024, Environmental Sciences Proceedings has been renamed to Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings and is now published here.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Productivity and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Tree Felling by Chainsaw in Thinning of Calabrian Pine Stands †

Dipartimento di Agraria, Località Feo di Vito, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Forests—Exploring New Discoveries and New Directions in Forests, 15–31 October 2022; Available online: https://iecf2022.sciforum.net/.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 22(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13039
Published: 15 October 2022

Abstract

:
Forest mechanisation plays an important role in increasing labour productivity and reducing production costs. Chainsaws are the most commonly used tool used for tree felling and can have both positive and negative environmental impacts on the forest ecosystem. Impacts that should be analysed considering all implemented inputs and outputs related to the involved technology. This work aims at evaluating the operational and environmental performance of a medium-sized chainsaw during a second thinning carried out on Calabrian Pine high forests. The trees, located at an altitude of 1100 m a.s.l, had an average diameter at the breast height of 30.6 cm and a height of 18 m for a density of 950 trees ha−1. The terrain roughness presents obstacles on less than 1/3 of the surface while the slope was between I and II classes (0–40%). A work time study on the felling operation was conducted considering a full-tree system. Thirty operational cycles were registered: observed time was separated into working time, which included main and complementary working times, calculated as average gross productivity, inclusive of all delays up to the maximum event duration of 15 min. The life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was adopted for environmental performance. As a functional unit, 1 m3 of round wood was chosen. The inventory data, relating to the background processes, were collected from Agribalyse 3.0.1., while data from the foreground, such as materials and fuel consumption, were directly collected. Environmental impact data were processed using OpenLCA software and the ReCiPe 2016 method at the midpoint level. Team productivity was equal to 10.30 trees h−1, corresponding to a volume of timber of 11.2 m3 h−1. Considering a working day of 8 h, productivity was equal to 41 trees d−1 worker−1 for a volume of timber of 44.8 m3 d−1 worker−1. The performed LCA showed that emissions related to the stage of use represented a major hotspot in “Global warming” (2.169 kg CO2 eq.), “Ozone Formation–Human Health” (0.038 kg Nox eq.), “Fine particulate matter formation” (0.001774 kg PM 2.5 eq.) and “Terrestrial ecotoxicity” categories (4.234 kg 1,4-DCB). In conclusion, the analysed site showed a suitable level of internal organization, but more regular management of the chainsaw is required. The environmental impact is affected by the energy systems in the use phase but is needed to deepen the knowledge of all aspects involved from upstream processes for certain materials to manufacture components.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/IECF2022-13039/s1. Conference poster.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, B.B., G.M., G.F.; methodology, B.B., G.M., G.F.; formal analysis, B.B., G.M., G.F.; investigation B.B., G.M., G.F.; data curation, B.B., G.M., G.F.; writing—original draft preparation, B.B., G.M., G.F.; writing—review and editing, B.B., G.M., G.F.; visualisation, B.B., G.M., G.F.; project administration, B.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bernardi, B.; Macrì, G.; Falcone, G. Productivity and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Tree Felling by Chainsaw in Thinning of Calabrian Pine Stands. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 22, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13039

AMA Style

Bernardi B, Macrì G, Falcone G. Productivity and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Tree Felling by Chainsaw in Thinning of Calabrian Pine Stands. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 22(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bernardi, Bruno, Giorgio Macrì, and Giacomo Falcone. 2022. "Productivity and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Tree Felling by Chainsaw in Thinning of Calabrian Pine Stands" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 22, no. 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13039

APA Style

Bernardi, B., Macrì, G., & Falcone, G. (2022). Productivity and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Tree Felling by Chainsaw in Thinning of Calabrian Pine Stands. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 22(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13039

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop