Next Article in Journal
Is It Possible to Compromise Forest Conservation with Forest Use?
Previous Article in Journal
Estimating the Statistical Significance of Cross–Correlations between Hydroclimatic Processes in the Presence of Long–Range Dependence
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Three Reanalysis Soil Temperature Datasets with Observation Data over China

Institute of Arid Meteorology, Key Laboratory of Arid Climatic Change and Reducing Disaster of Gansu Province, Key Laboratory of Arid Climatic Change and Disaster Reduction, China Meteorological Administration, Northwestern Regional Center of Numerical Weather Prediction, Lanzhou 730000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Earth 2022, 3(4), 1042-1058; https://doi.org/10.3390/earth3040060
Submission received: 12 July 2022 / Revised: 21 September 2022 / Accepted: 22 September 2022 / Published: 11 October 2022

Abstract

Soil temperature is a crucial parameter in surface emissions of carbon, water, and energy exchanges. This study utilized the soil temperature of 836 national basic meteorological observing stations over China to evaluate three soil temperature products. Soil temperature data from the China Meteorology Administration Land Data Assimilation System (CLDAS), European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ERA-Interim), and Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) during 2017 are evaluated. The results showed that soil temperature reanalysis datasets display a significant north-to-south difference over eastern China with generally underestimated magnitudes. CLDAS data perform soil temperature assessment best at different depths and can be reproduced well in most areas of China. CLDAS slightly overestimates soil temperature in summer. The most significant deviation of ERA-Interim (GLDAS) appears in summer (summer and autumn). As soil depth increases, the soil temperature errors of all three datasets increase. The CLDAS represents the soil temperature over China but owns a more considerable bias in barren or sparsely vegetated croplands. ERA-Interim performs poorest in urban and built-up and barren or sparsely vegetated areas. GLDAS overall owns an enormous bias at the mixed forest, grassland, and croplands areas, which should be improved, especially in summer. However, it performs better in open shrublands and barren or sparsely vegetated areas. The ST of mixed forests shows better results in the south region than the north region. For grasslands, smaller MEs are located in the north and northwest regions. The ST of croplands shows the poorest performance over the northwest region.
Keywords: soil temperature; CLDAS; ERA-Interim; GLDAS soil temperature; CLDAS; ERA-Interim; GLDAS

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, C.; Gong, C.; Duan, H.; Yan, P.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, G. Evaluation of Three Reanalysis Soil Temperature Datasets with Observation Data over China. Earth 2022, 3, 1042-1058. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth3040060

AMA Style

Zhao C, Gong C, Duan H, Yan P, Liu Y, Zhou G. Evaluation of Three Reanalysis Soil Temperature Datasets with Observation Data over China. Earth. 2022; 3(4):1042-1058. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth3040060

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Cailing, Chongshui Gong, Haixia Duan, Pengcheng Yan, Yuanpu Liu, and Ganlin Zhou. 2022. "Evaluation of Three Reanalysis Soil Temperature Datasets with Observation Data over China" Earth 3, no. 4: 1042-1058. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth3040060

APA Style

Zhao, C., Gong, C., Duan, H., Yan, P., Liu, Y., & Zhou, G. (2022). Evaluation of Three Reanalysis Soil Temperature Datasets with Observation Data over China. Earth, 3(4), 1042-1058. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth3040060

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop