Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Environmental Footprint Assessment of Sub-Saharan Africa’s Oil Energy Companies: Case of BOCOM Petroleum, Douala-Cameroon

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and environmental footprint of BOCOM Petroleum, a mid-sized downstream oil company operating in Douala, Cameroon. In response to the critical need for empirical data on industrial emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa, a mixed-methods approach combining Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), carbon accounting, and stakeholder interviews was adopted. Emissions were categorised following the GHG Protocol into Scope 1 (direct), Scope 2 (energy-related), and Scope 3 (value chain). Results reveal total annual emissions of 51,734 CO₂, kg/year, with Scope 3 accounting for 38%, Scope 2 for 33%, and Scope 1 for 29%. Major emission sources include stationary combustion, laboratory processes, and the use of electricity-intensive heat-generating machines. An Environmental Management Plan (EMP) was developed, proposing actionable measures such as process optimisation, adoption of energy-efficient equipment, electrification of vehicle fleets, and improved waste management. Findings underscore the need for systemic decarbonisation strategies among mid-sized oil firms and highlight the alignment of corporate initiatives with Cameroon’s climate commitments. This study contributes a replicable methodological framework for emission auditing in industrial enterprises across the region and calls for further integration of environmental and financial planning in corporate sustainability strategies.

1. Introduction

The accelerating pace of global climate change, primarily driven by greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from anthropogenic activities, has emerged as one of the most important environmental challenges of the 21st century [1,2]. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), human-induced emissions—particularly carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), and nitrous oxide (N₂O)—have led to unprecedented atmospheric concentrations, resulting in rising global temperatures, sea-level rise, and increased frequency of extreme weather events [3]. The energy sector accounts for approximately 73% of total global GHG emissions, positioning it at the focus of climate mitigation strategies [4]. Among these, the oil and gas industry is a major emitter due to direct combustion, process emissions, and downstream distribution activities [5]. Tackling emissions from this sector is therefore crucial to achieving the global targets set under the Paris Agreement, which aims to limit temperature rise to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels, and ideally to 1.5 °C [6].

In Sub-Saharan Africa, the interplay between energy development, economic growth, and environmental sustainability presents a complex challenge. The region is highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and increasingly reliant on fossil fuels to meet its rising energy demand [7]. Petroleum-based energy remains the backbone of many Sub-Saharan economies, not only for export revenues but also for domestic energy access, particularly in urban and peri-urban areas where liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is expanding. However, the oil and gas sector in the region is often characterised by poor environmental governance, limited emissions monitoring capacity, and outdated infrastructure, leading to high fugitive emissions and inefficient energy use [8]. While mitigation initiatives are needed, including commitments through Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), most countries in the region lack robust frameworks for tracking industrial GHG outputs, particularly in the downstream segment of the oil industry.

In Cameroon, the dual objective of accelerating economic development while adhering to environmental sustainability remains a formidable policy dilemma. The country’s growing reliance on fossil fuels, particularly petroleum derivatives, has raised concerns over the environmental impacts of energy sector operations. Despite the enactment of environmental laws such as Law No. 96/12 of 5 August 1996 on Environmental Management, enforcement mechanisms remain weak and inconsistently applied across industrial sectors [9]. Petroleum storage and distribution activities often escape systematic monitoring due to insufficient institutional capacity and limited access to emissions data. Moreover, while Cameroon’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement aim to reduce GHG emissions by 32% by 2035 relative to a business-as-usual scenario, the measures proposed are largely focused on forestry and energy production, with little emphasis on emissions from the industrial and distribution sectors [10]. Bridging this gap requires empirical studies at the enterprise level to quantify emissions and evaluate practical mitigation strategies—especially in high-impact sectors such as oil and gas distribution.

BOCOM Petroleum, a leading private player in the Cameroonian downstream oil sector, offers an exemplary case for evaluating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and environmental performance within a Sub-Saharan African context. Headquartered in Douala, BOCOM is primarily involved in the importation, storage, and distribution of petroleum products, including liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), diesel, and lubricants. With over 30 filling stations and several storage depots nationwide, the company operates critical infrastructure that presents significant opportunities for both emissions monitoring and strategic intervention [11]. The choice of BOCOM as a case study is grounded in its representativeness of middle-scale oil distribution companies operating under relatively lax environmental oversight, where emissions are often underestimated or undocumented. Moreover, the company has expressed growing interest in sustainability transitions, particularly through its investments in LPG distribution as a cleaner household energy alternative. Despite the growing body of literature on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the global oil and gas sector, to the best of the author’s knowledge, no peer-reviewed study has yet quantified BOCOM’s direct and indirect GHG emissions, nor assessed its environmental footprint or mitigation potential. This empirical gap limits the capacity of policymakers to design targeted emissions reduction strategies in the oil distribution segment—a sector often overlooked in national climate planning. This analysis contributes to a more granular understanding of GHG sources in the downstream oil sector and provides a methodological reference for similar assessments across the region.

In response to the identified empirical and methodological gaps, this study sets out to fulfil three specific objectives: (1) identify the main sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with BOCOM Petroleum’s operations in Douala, Cameroon; (2) assess the company’s overall environmental footprint using established carbon accounting methods; and (3) propose a strategic action plan for emission management based on evidence gathered during the study. To achieve these objectives, a mixed-methods approach is adopted, integrating quantitative and qualitative techniques. Carbon footprint assessment based on the ISO 14044 Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) standard [12], supported by data from primary surveys, secondary industry reports, and tertiary government statistics. Field visits, semi-structured interviews and documentary analysis were conducted to capture contextual and operational variables. The remainder of this paper is structured into four sections: after the introduction, Section 2 provides a comprehensive literature review covering theoretical foundations, previous studies on corporate emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa. Section 3 outlines the research methodology and data collection processes. Section 4 presents the main findings, including a breakdown of emission sources, carbon footprint estimates, and targeted mitigation strategy. Section 5 discusses the findings obtained and the Section 6 concludes with policy implications and recommendations for further research.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Overview of GHG in Industrial Oil Sector

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the oil industry primarily originate from exploration, flaring, refining, and transportation. According to the IEA, oil and gas operations account for over 15% of global energy-related GHG emissions. Sub-Saharan Africa, with extensive flaring practices, remains a critical hotspot [13]. In Nigeria alone, oil sector emissions exceeded 129 CO₂, Mt in 2020 [14]. Despite growing pressure from international frameworks such as the Paris Agreement and rising ESG investment standards, mitigation policies remain underdeveloped in the region. Countries like Angola and Ghana lack effective emission tracking in the upstream sector. Strengthening carbon reporting and integrating life-cycle approaches are now essential for sustainable oil production in Africa [14].

2.2. Pollution Levels and Carbon Footprint of Oil Companies Worldwide and in Sub-Saharan Africa

Petroleum companies contribute significantly to global carbon emissions, with methane (CH₄), carbon dioxide (CO₂), and nitrous oxide (N₂O) being the most reported pollutants [15]. Carbon footprint assessments typically employ life-cycle analysis (LCA) in accordance with ISO 14064 [16] or ISO 14067 [17] standards. Globally, major oil firms report upstream emissions ranging from 70 to 120 kg CO₂-eq per barrel [18]. In Sub-Saharan Africa, empirical data remain scarce and fragmented. For instance, Ghana’s offshore operations emit an average of 96 CO₂, kt/year per barrel, yet few firms disclose full LCA data [19]. Studies from Nigeria and Angola highlight inconsistencies due to lack of monitoring frameworks. These limitations hinder accurate carbon accounting, making it difficult to design robust mitigation strategies. There is a critical need for standardised, transparent, and localised assessments across African oil-producing nations.

2.3. Empirical Studies on Emissions Reduction in African Industrial Firms

Empirical research on greenhouse gas mitigation in Sub-Saharan African industrial firms remains limited, particularly in medium-sized petroleum enterprises. Most existing studies focus on large manufacturing firms or extractive industries in Nigeria, South Africa, and Ghana [16,17]. Commonly used methodologies include Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), carbon audits, and participatory approaches involving stakeholder engagement [18,19,20]. While LCA provides a holistic view of emissions throughout the production cycle, its implementation is often hampered by data scarcity and technical capacity in many African contexts [21]. Participatory methods, though contextually adaptable, suffer from low institutional uptake and fragmented reporting frameworks. A significant research gap concerns mid-sized oil companies, which are often excluded from climate accountability schemes. These gaps present both analytical and policy opportunities to develop context-specific emissions management models. The lack of empirical data on firms such as BOCOM Petroleum in Cameroon exemplifies the urgent need for localised studies to inform national climate strategies and industrial decarbonisation plans.

2.4. Corporate Strategies for GHG Emissions Reduction

Oil companies worldwide are increasingly adopting strategies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in response to regulatory pressure, investor expectations, and global climate targets [22]. Common approaches include energy efficiency improvements, bioenergy integration, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and digital emissions monitoring [23,24]. Major international firms such as TotalEnergies have committed to net-zero pathways and invested heavily in renewable energy and CCS technologies [22,25]. In contrast, regional firms like Tradex and SONARA in Cameroon demonstrate limited diversification and primarily focus on operational efficiency and fuel substitution [26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. The disparity reflects differences in financial capacity, regulatory frameworks, and technological readiness [33]. In the context of the Global South, energy transition is further constrained by dependency on fossil fuels for industrial growth and limited access to clean technologies. Nevertheless, localised innovation, public–private partnerships, and fiscal incentives are emerging as viable enablers of decarbonisation among small-to-medium oil firms. Understanding these regional strategies is vital to tailoring realistic and inclusive climate action plans.

2.5. Specific Challenges in Oil-Producing Sub-Saharan African Countries

Oil-producing countries in Sub-Saharan Africa face a triple challenge: achieving economic development, ensuring energy security, and responding to climate change imperatives. The energy-climate-development dilemma is particularly acute in countries like Nigeria, Angola, and Cameroon, where fossil fuel exports underpin public revenues and GDP [34]. Yet, these nations remain highly vulnerable to climate impacts while lacking financial and institutional capacity for green transitions [35]. Weak regulatory frameworks, inconsistent energy governance, and limited climate financing constrain national climate strategies [36]. International actors—such as development banks, the UNFCCC, and climate funds—play a crucial role in mobilising resources and technical support [37]. However, external support is often fragmented and misaligned with national development priorities. Bridging this gap requires coordinated policies, regional integration, and local ownership of low-carbon strategies tailored to Sub-Saharan contexts.

The reviewed literature reveals a growing awareness of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the global oil industry, with extensive documentation of emissions sources across exploration, refining, and distribution phases. Studies conducted by international organisations such as the IEA and IPCC underscore the oil sector’s major contribution to global emissions and highlight international pressure through mechanisms like the Paris Agreement and ESG requirements. In Sub-Saharan Africa, however, empirical studies remain largely fragmented and concentrated on a few large economies like Nigeria and Angola. Carbon footprint assessments and pollution rates have been explored using tools such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and carbon audits, yet results are often generalised and lack contextual specificity. Notably, there is a dearth of empirical research focusing on mid-sized oil firms, particularly within Central Africa, including Cameroon. Moreover, most existing studies are either descriptive or technical, offering little integration between corporate strategies, national policy frameworks, and local socio-economic realities. Comparative analyses of emissions mitigation strategies reveal a disparity between international oil majors and local firms in terms of technology adoption and institutional readiness. Southern countries face the compounded challenges of weak governance, limited financial capacities, and conflicting development priorities. There is an urgent need for operational and localised research on emission reduction in mid-sized African oil firms. The case of BOCOM Petroleum offers an opportunity to bridge this empirical and strategic gap by assessing its environmental footprint and alignment with Cameroon’s climate commitments.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Research Design and Conceptual Framework

This study employs a case study design grounded in a mixed-methods approach, integrating both qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure methodological robustness and contextual relevance. The focus is on BOCOM Petroleum, a mid-sized oil company operating in Douala, Cameroon, selected purposefully to explore corporate contributions to greenhouse gas mitigation within a Sub-Saharan African context. This design facilitates an in-depth investigation of emissions dynamics within an industrial setting, capturing complex socio-technical interactions and operational realities.

Primary data collection methods include semi-structured interviews and site visits, while secondary data encompasses internal reports and emissions registers. Tertiary sources involve scientific literature and international databases, aligning with best practices in environmental auditing and life cycle analysis. The mixed-methods framework supports triangulation, enhancing the validity and reliability of findings. This approach is increasingly endorsed in environmental performance research for its ability to link micro-level enterprise behaviour with macro-level sustainability outcomes.

This study focuses exclusively on downstream activities of the oil value chain, including storage, bottling, distribution, and associated operational processes at BOCOM Petroleum. Upstream activities such as crude oil exploration, extraction, gas flaring, and reservoir-related emissions, as well as large-scale refining processes, are the scope of this analysis. These activities are known to contribute significantly to national greenhouse gas emissions in major oil-producing countries and may reach magnitudes several orders higher than those reported in this study.

3.2. Model Assumptions and Uncertainty Analysis

The estimation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in this study is based on a set of methodological assumptions required to ensure consistency and applicability in a data-constrained industrial context. First, emission factors were primarily derived from the IPCC (2019) Guidelines and supplemented by values reported in the literature where necessary [38]. These factors were assumed to be constant over the study period and representative of typical combustion and electricity generation conditions. Second, activity data were obtained from company records, field observations, and stakeholder interviews. In cases where direct measurements were unavailable, conservative estimates and average values were applied based on comparable industrial practices. For Scope 2 emissions, a national average electricity emission factor was used, assuming a homogeneous grid mix. Seasonal variations in electricity generation were not explicitly accounted for. Scope 3 emissions were partially estimated using standard coefficients and proxy data due to limited availability of detailed value chain information. As a result, some indirect emission sources may be under- or over-estimated. The system boundary of the study was restricted to downstream operations, excluding upstream activities such as extraction, refining, and flaring, which are known to contribute significantly to overall emissions in the oil and gas sector.

3.3. Data Collection

This study adopted a multi-source data collection strategy tailored to the complex nature of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the industrial oil sector. Primary data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with technical staff, environmental managers and operational personnel at BOCOM Petroleum in Douala, Cameroon. These interviews provided contextual insights into emission sources, operational routines, and mitigation practices.

Direct field observations and on-site visits were conducted to validate reported emissions data and to understand infrastructural and logistical processes. Secondary data included company-level documents such as GHG inventories, annual environmental reports, and internal audits covering the years 2020 to 2023. In addition, tertiary sources included peer-reviewed literature, national regulatory documents, and reports from international agencies such as the International Energy Agency (IEA) and UNFCCC.

This triangulation ensures both internal validity and contextual depth. Furthermore, the approach aligns with methodological frameworks in recent African energy transition studies [34,35,36], enabling comparisons between BOCOM’s performance and regional decarbonisation benchmarks.

3.4. Analytical Framework

This study employed a hybrid analytical framework combining Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and carbon footprint analysis, based on ISO 14044 standards, to evaluate BOCOM Petroleum’s greenhouse gas emissions. The LCA approach enables a comprehensive appraisal of emissions across upstream and downstream activities—including fuel storage, bottling, transportation, and distribution—following the cradle-to-gate model [37,38,39]. Quantitative emission estimates were calculated using CO₂-equivalent factors in alignment with IPCC 2019 Guidelines and the Greenhouse Gas Protocol [40,41]. These calculations facilitated disaggregation of emissions by source and operational unit.

Emissions from each source were estimated using the following standard equation:

$$GHG Emission{s}_i=A_i\times {EF}_i$$

(1)

where $A_i$ Activity data for source iii (e.g., litres of diesel consumed, tonnes of LPG distributed) ${EF}_i$ is Emission factor for activity iii (CO₂, kg/unit).

Equation (2): Formula for fuels

$$GHG Emission{s}_i=Q_i\times {EF}_i$$

(2)

where $Q_i$ Quantity of fuel consumed

${EF}_i$ is Emission factor for activity iii (CO₂, kg/unit).

Equation (3): Formula associated with electricity

$$GHG Emission{s}_i=E_i\times {EF}_i$$

(3)

where $E_i$ Quantity of electricity consumed, ${EF}_i$ is Emission factor for activity iii (CO₂, kg/unit). The total carbon footprint (CF) is then obtained by summing all emission sources:

$${CF}_{total}={\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^n}(A_i\times {EF}_i)$$

(4)

After identifying and assessing the environmental impacts, we drew up an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP), which is an instrument for ensuring that the project is effectively integrated into its environment. It consists of a plan for implementing environmental measures, a monitoring plan and a follow-up plan to align company performance with national environmental targets and the Paris Agreement goals [42].

4. Results

This section presents and interprets the findings obtained through the mixed-methods approach employed in this study. Quantitative and qualitative data collected from BOCOM Petroleum were analysed to evaluate the company’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and environmental footprint. The results are organised into four subsections: (i) a breakdown of emissions by operational activity; (ii) an estimation of the company’s overall carbon footprint; and (iii) a strategic action plan for environmental management.

4.1. Description of Emissions by Activity/Process

In order to assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated by BOCOM Petroleum, the study adopted the categorization of emissions based on the GHG Protocol, distinguishing between direct emissions (Scope 1), indirect emissions related to energy (Scope 2), and other indirect emissions (Scope 3).

Table 1. Sources of GHG Emissions.

Emissions Categories	Emissions Activities
Direct GHG emissions	Laboratory chemical processes (lubricant production)
	Stationary combustion (use of diesel as a generator for the generator set)
	Compression unloading process (extraction of gas from tankers to the company’s tanks)
	Manufacturing process for gas storage cylinders
	Vehicle operating inside the company
Indirect emissions associated with energy	Electrical Heat-generating machines
	Electronic devices, air conditioning air-conditioning, filtering process
Other indirect emissions	Moving employees
	Purchases and upstream transport of goods
	Waste generated
	Use and Leakage of refrigerants
	Use of purchased materials (butane, gas cylinders, granules, seals, etc.)
	End of life of purchased materials

below presents the main emission sources identified through field observations, staff interviews, and the carbon audit process.

Table 1 outlines the categorization of greenhouse gas emissions at BOCOM Petroleum, based on the standard classification of direct emissions (Scope 1), energy-related indirect emissions (Scope 2), and other indirect emissions (Scope 3). The identified sources span chemical processes, energy consumption, waste generation, employee mobility, and material lifecycle, demonstrating a comprehensive mapping of the company’s carbon footprint. This emissions structure is consistent with empirical observations in other African oil-producing contexts. For instance, a study by Acobta et al. (2023) on palm oil systems in Cameroon found that indirect emissions from land conversion and effluent treatment represented a significant share of total emissions, reinforcing the importance of a value chain approach to GHG accounting [43]. Similarly, Yusuf et al. (2020) demonstrated that in several African oil-producing countries, stationary combustion and flaring are major contributors to GHG emissions, echoing the direct sources reported at BOCOM Petroleum [44]. Moreover, recent analysis by the Africa Centre for Energy Policy [45] emphasises that the oil and gas sector accounts for approximately 62% of methane emissions from energy operations in Africa, largely due to incomplete combustion, flaring, and leakages—activities also present at BOCOM Petroleum. Methane’s short-term global warming potential makes it a critical target for mitigation. In sum, Table 1 reflects both the complexity and the systemic nature of emissions across operational activities. It highlights the importance of integrated GHG accounting and underscores the relevance of tackling emissions not only at the process level but across the entire operational value chain, as supported by previous regional studies.

4.2. Breakdown of Emissions by Activity/Process

4.2.1. Scope 1

The first score presented in Figure 1 shows a breakdown of estimated CO₂ emissions (in CO₂, kg/year) across various operational activities at BOCOM Petroleum. The total annual emissions amount to 15,246 CO₂, kg/year, distributed among six key activities: laboratory chemical processes, stationary combustion, compression unloading, gas manufacturing, vehicle operations, and internal activities.

Among these, stationary combustion emerges as the principal source of emissions, contributing 6620 CO₂, kg/year (approximately 43.4% of total emissions). This is followed by laboratory chemical processes (3760 CO₂, kg/year, 24.7%), manufacturing process for gas (2686 kgCO₂/year, 17.6%), vehicle operations (1230 kgCO₂-eq/year, 8.1%), and compression unloading (950 CO₂, kg/year, 6.2%). This pattern is consistent with broader industrial GHG profiles, where combustion of fossil fuels for energy generation and process emissions from chemical transformations are typically the leading sources of direct emissions in oil and gas operations [46]. The high emissions from stationary combustion likely stem from the use of diesel or heavy fuel oil in heating systems or generators, which are known to have high emission factors [47]. The compression unloading process, although contributing the least (950 CO₂, kg/year), is non-negligible. Compared to the benchmark emission values reported for gas compression units in similar-scale plants (often below 500 CO₂, kg/year, BOCOM’s value suggests a potential for optimisation in pressure management and leak prevention strategies. This initial carbon scoring highlights areas of concern, especially combustion and laboratory activities, which together represent over two-thirds of total emissions. Unlike in more mechanised or technologically upgraded refineries, BOCOM’s emissions profile suggests reliance on traditional combustion methods and chemical-based diagnostics. Given this structure, the firm may benefit from investment in energy-efficient systems and process modernisation. Moreover, when benchmarked against companies such as Total Energies Cameroon or Sonangol Angola, whose total CO₂ outputs are in the range of 10,000–12,000 CO₂, kg/year for similar units (with advanced carbon management), BOCOM’s figures appear moderately higher. This justifies an urgent need for decarbonisation strategies tailored to its operational realities. Finally, Score1 underscores the necessity for targeted interventions in combustion and laboratory operations. Compared to similar companies in the region, BOCOM Petroleum’s emission intensity is slightly elevated, especially considering its operational size. Thus, implementing energy efficiency upgrades, fuel switching, and green lab practices could significantly reduce the overall carbon footprint.

4.2.2. Scope 2

Figure 2 presents the estimated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under Scope 2, which includes emissions from purchased electricity used in operational activities. The total emissions attributed to Scope 2 amount to 17,242 CO₂, kg/year, which is notably higher than those recorded under Scope 1 (15,246 CO₂, kg/year). This result highlights the significant dependence of BOCOM Petroleum on external electricity sources. The breakdown reveals that heat-generating machines are the primary contributors, accounting for 14,652 CO₂, kg/year, or approximately 85% of Scope 2 emissions. These machines include boilers, industrial heaters, and other thermal processing equipment. In contrast, electronic devices (computers, control systems, lighting, etc.) contribute 2590 CO₂, kg/year (15%). This structure reflects the typical energy use profile in industrial settings, where thermal energy systems dominate electricity demand due to the operation of boilers, furnaces, or heat exchangers, often running continuously at high load.

The predominance of heat-generating machines in Scope 2 emissions at BOCOM Petroleum is consistent with similar observations in petroleum processing and storage companies in Nigeria and South Africa [48]. The 14,652 CO₂, kg/year attributed to heat-generating machines suggests the use of high-consumption equipment with low thermal efficiency. According to the International Energy Agency, waste heat recovery, thermal insulation, and variable speed drives can lead to up to 30% energy savings, especially in older industrial facilities [48]. The remaining 2590 CO₂, kg/year from electronic devices—computers, lighting, control systems, and laboratory tools—though proportionally smaller, still offers room for improvement. Transitioning to Energy Star-certified or Class A+++ devices can yield savings of 20–40%, as demonstrated in energy audits conducted in East African oil depots.

Given the Cameroon energy mix, where thermal power still dominates over hydroelectric capacity during dry seasons [48], improving electricity efficiency is not only cost-effective but also contributes to national GHG reduction objectives as per the Cameroon Nationally Determined Contributions [49]. In accordance with the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance [50], it is crucial that BOCOM Petroleum reports both location-based and market-based emissions—taking into account the emission factor of the actual electricity supplier—to ensure transparency and comparability with international standards.

The dominance of emissions from heat-generating machines suggests a need to reassess energy efficiency practices at BOCOM Petroleum. Opportunities include the deployment of energy-efficient burners, the integration of waste heat recovery systems, and shifting toward cleaner electricity sources, such as photovoltaic systems, particularly given Cameroon’s high solar potential [51]. Furthermore, the relatively low contribution from electronic devices indicates that administrative and control functions have a minor impact on overall emissions. This is consistent with other studies showing that emissions from IT and office equipment in industrial settings typically account for less than 10% of Scope 2 totals.

4.2.3. Scope 3

Scope 3 emissions represent all other indirect emissions that occur in a company’s value chain. These include emissions from activities such as business travel, outsourced processes, upstream/downstream transport, and end-of-life treatment of products. According to the data shown in Figure 3, the total Scope 3 emissions for BOCOM Petroleum are estimated at 19,246 CO₂, t/year.

The dominant contribution arises from waste generated, estimated at 7234 CO₂, kg/year, accounting for approximately 38% of total Scope 3 emissions. The use and leakage of refrigerants represents the second-largest source, with 5072 CO₂, kg/year, highlighting the disproportionate climate impact of fluorinated gases despite relatively low mass leakages. Emissions linked to purchases and upstream transport of goods amount to 2387 CO₂, kg/year, reflecting fuel combustion in logistics and embodied emissions in transported inputs. Similarly, the end-of-life treatment of purchased materials contributes 2376 kCO₂-eq/year, indicating that downstream material disposal pathways also play a non-negligible role in the corporate value-chain footprint. Conversely, employee mobility (1237 CO₂, kg/year) and the use of purchased materials (940 CO₂, kg/year) show comparatively lower contributions, together accounting for less than 12% of Scope 3 emissions.

Overall, the results demonstrate that Scope 3 emissions are primarily driven by waste management inefficiencies and refrigerant-related losses, rather than transport or material use alone. This distribution clearly indicates that effective decarbonisation strategies must extend beyond operational boundaries and prioritise circular economy practices, refrigerant control, and value-chain engagement.

Figure 4 presents a summary of the distribution of BOCOM Petroleum’s annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, expressed in kilotonnes of CO₂ equivalent per year (CO₂, kg/year), across the three scopes defined by the GHG Protocol: Scope 1 (Direct emissions): 15,246 CO₂, kg/year (approximately 29%); scope 2 (Indirect emissions from purchased electricity): 17,242 CO₂, kg/year (approximately 33%), scope 3 (Other indirect emissions from the value chain): 19,246 CO₂, kg/year (approximately 38%).

The data indicate that Scope 3 emissions constitute the largest share of BOCOM Petroleum’s total GHG emissions. This trend is consistent with findings in similar industrial contexts, where value chain activities—such as upstream material processing, logistics, and downstream product use—significantly contribute to overall emissions. The Scope 2 emissions, accounting for about one-third of total emissions, suggest a substantial reliance on grid electricity. In regions like Cameroon, electricity generation is predominantly fossil-fuel-based, leading to higher indirect emissions. Scope 1 emissions, representing direct emissions from sources owned or controlled by the company (e.g., on-site fuel combustion, company vehicles), also form a significant portion of the total emissions. This underscores the need for cleaner production technologies and energy efficiency measures within the company’s operations.

This comparison, presented in

Table 2. Comparison analysis of emissions.

Company/Study	Scope 1 (%)	Scope 2 (%)	Scope 3 (%)	Region
BOCOM Petroleum (This study)	29%	33%	38%	Cameroon
Industry Average [52]	25%	30%	45%	Global
IEA Regional Average [53]	28%	30%	42%	Sub-Saharan Africa

, illustrates that BOCOM Petroleum’s emissions profile aligns with regional and global trends, with a slightly higher proportion of Scope 2 emissions, highlighting opportunities for energy efficiency improvements and renewable energy integration. To address Scope 2 emissions, transitioning to renewable energy sources, such as solar or wind power, could significantly reduce indirect emissions. Implementing energy efficiency measures across operations can further mitigate these emissions. For Scope 1 emissions, investing in low-carbon technologies and optimising operational processes can lead to immediate reductions in direct emissions, aligning with the principles outlined by IPCC [46].

• Environmental Management Plan

The proposed Environmental Management Plan (EMP) presents a structured and operational approach aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from BOCOM Petroleum’s main industrial activities. This plan is presented in two tables.

Table 3. Environmental Management Plan for scope 1 and scope 2 emissions reductions.

Information on Impacts and Proposed Measures				Information on the Implementation of Measures			Effectiveness Monitoring
Source Activities	Importance *	Proposed Measures	Objective of Measure	Activities Required	Implementation Period **	Responsible for Implementation	Monitoring Indicators	Verification Methods
Laboratory chemical processes	+++	Use clean technologies	Reduction in waste produced	Investing in clean and efficient technologies	+++	General Manager/SafetyManager	Volume of chemical waste/frequency of disposal	Half-yearly environmental audit/safety data sheets
Stationary combustion	++	Conversion to natural gas/biogas boilers or replacement with heat pumps	Reduction in direct CO2; emissions (Scope 1)	Energy assessment, new boiler installation, maintenance	++	Maintenance Manager	Fossil fuel consumption (litres/year)	Invoice tracking + CO2; sensors
Compression unloading process	++	Modernisation of compressors to reduce leaks	Reducing energy losses and gas leaks	Equipment audit, upgrade	++	Production Manager/Safety Manager	Leak detected/specific energy consumption	Maintenance report/leak test
Manufacturing process for gas storage cylinders	+++	Energy optimisation of machines, control of material losses	Emissions reduction/process decarbonisation	Workshop diagnostics, insulation, improvement of machine efficiency	+++	Production Manager/Safety Manager	tCO2;/cylinder produced, kWh/unit	Quarterly energy balance
Vehicle operating inside the company	++	Switching to electric vehicles	Emissions reduction	Assessment of current fleet, purchase/maintenance of clean vehicles	+++	Logistic Manager	CO2;/km travelled	Logbook, technical data sheets
Heat-generating machines	++	Installation of automatic control systems	Reduction in thermalenergy consumption	Adjustment of combustion systems, verification of insulation	++	Maintenance Manager	Thermal efficiency, kWh/product	Monthly energy monitoring
Electronic devices	+++	Gradual transition to low-energy equipment (Energy Star label)	Reducing electricity demand	Replacement of old equipment, staff awareness training	+	Maintenance Manager/Certified Electrician	kWh/year per position or department	Consumption monitoring, bills, smart sensors

Importance *: + Low important ++ Middle Important +++ Very important; Implementation period **: Short term + Medium term ++ Long term +++.

presents the measures related to Scope 1 (direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect emissions related to electricity consumption) sources, and

Table 4. Environmental Management Plan for scope 3 emissions reductions.

Information on Impacts and Proposed Measures				Information on the Implementation of Measures			Effectiveness Monitoring
Source Activities	Importance	Proposed Measures	Objective of Measure	Activities Required	Implementation Period	Responsible for Implementation	Monitoring Indicators	Verification Methods
Moving of people	+	Use of hybrid/electric vehicles, promotion of carpooling	Reduction in CO2; emissions from transport	Purchase/rental of low-carbon vehicles, eco-driving training	++	Logistics and Safety Manager	Fuel consumption per month, CO2;/km	GPS tracking, consumption records,
Purchases, upstream and downtream transport of goods	+				++	Logistics and Safety Manager		Monthly analysis of transport invoices
End of life of purchased materials	+	Promoting recycling and reuse of waste	Reduction of final waste	Internal awareness-raising, contractual agreements with recycling organisations	+	Logistics and Safety Manager	Percentage of waste sorted and recycled	Waste weighing, service provider reporting
Waste generated	++	Promoting recycling and reuse of waste	Reduction in landfill waste volumes	Set up a recycling programme on site	++	Safety Manager	Volume rate of recycled waste	Measuring the amount of waste recycled
Use of purchased materials		Use of high energy efficiency equipment,	Reduction in electricity consumption	Energy audit, replacement of obsolete equipment	+++	Maintenance and Safety Manager	Consumption kWh/machine	Eneo bill, IoT consumption sensors
Leakage of air conditioning refrigerants	+	Switch to low GWP gases (e.g. R-32, R-290), preventive maintenance	Reducing the fluorine footprint	Annual inventory of equipment, tracking of refilled quantities	+	Maintenance Manager	Annual leakage rate, recharge quantity	Equipment maintenance log, annual GHG report

Importance *: + Low important ++ Middle Important +++ Very important; Implementation period ++: Short term + Medium term ++ Long term +++.

deals Scope 3, in accordance with internationally recognised best practices [40].

• Laboratory Chemical Processes

The substitution of traditional technologies with cleaner alternatives is a robust strategy for chemical-intensive processes. Clean technologies such as closed-loop systems and solvent recovery units can reduce hazardous waste volumes and prevent fugitive emissions [54]. The planned biannual environmental audit and reliance on safety data sheets (SDS) are effective, though a continuous monitoring system using digital sensors may enhance precision.

• Stationary Combustion

Replacing conventional combustion systems with biogas-fired boilers or heat pumps is commendable and consistent with decarbonisation pathways recommended for industrial heat applications [48]. This action targets Scope 1 reductions directly. However, fuel switching feasibility studies should be systematically conducted to assess infrastructure readiness and economic viability.

• Compression Unloading Process

Modernisation of compressors to limit gas leakage is an industry-wide recommended practice to prevent methane emissions, a potent GHG. Maintenance logs and leak detection and repair (LDAR) protocols, including infrared cameras and ultrasonic detectors, should be standardised.

• Manufacturing of Gas Cylinders

The combination of process optimisation, energy efficiency upgrades, and material loss controls reflects a holistic approach. The use of key performance indicators like tCO₂-eq/unit produced is aligned with life cycle analysis methods.

• Vehicle Operation Within the Company

The transition to electric vehicles (EVs) represents a significant Scope 1 mitigation action. Studies suggest that EV fleets in industrial zones can reduce up to 30% of transport-related emissions annually. However, battery lifecycle emissions and charging infrastructure must be factored in.

• Heat-Generating Machines

Installing automatic control systems and thermal insulation is a cost-effective measure for reducing fuel use in thermal equipment. This aligns with ISO 50001 energy management systems, which advocate for continuous improvement in energy use.

• Electronic Devices

Shifting towards low-consumption electronic devices (e.g., those rated Energy Star) addresses Scope 2 emissions reduction. However, given the lower relative impact, prioritisation may be secondary compared to high-impact sources. Nevertheless, digitalisation of monitoring via smart metering can generate savings and behavioural change.

As mentioned above, Table 4 presents an environmental management plan for managing Scope 3 emissions.

• Moving of People

The proposed transition to hybrid/electric vehicles and promotion of carpooling aims to mitigate Scope 1 transport-related CO₂ emissions. This strategy is well aligned with global decarbonisation pathways for corporate fleets. According to [55], replacing combustion vehicles with electric alternatives can cut operational emissions by up to 70%, depending on grid carbon intensity.

However, the measure’s success depends heavily on behaviour change and charging infrastructure. The implementation must thus include periodic driver performance audits and installation of charging stations compatible with Cameroon’s grid. The CO₂/km and monthly fuel use indicators are appropriate, but should be complemented by life cycle assessment (LCA) approaches for full emissions accounting [38].

○

Purchases and Transportation of Goods (Upstream/Downstream)

This category remains weakly detailed. Yet, logistics and procurement emissions, part of Scope 3, are increasingly recognised as dominant in industrial carbon footprints [56]. It is recommended to use carbon-efficient logistics (e.g., consolidated loads, alternative fuels), and adopt green procurement criteria. Monitoring should go beyond cost invoices to include emissions per kilometre (CO₂, t/km).

○

End-of-Life of Purchased Materials

The promotion of recycling and reuse addresses the circular economy dimension of sustainability. While this measure is low-cost and relatively easy to implement, its impact can be limited if not supported by structured waste sorting, partnerships with licenced recyclers, and robust internal education campaigns [57].

○

Waste Generated

The initiative to establish an on-site recycling programme represents a more proactive approach. As noted by [58], in emerging economies, source separation and local valorisation of industrial waste can reduce environmental burdens by up to 40%.

A volumetric recycling rate is a good KPI, but additional metrics such as avoided landfill cost and material recovery value should be considered. It is recommended to align waste management with ISO 14051 (MFCA—Material Flow Cost Accounting) for enhanced traceability of environmental and financial flows.

○

Use of Purchased Materials

Transitioning to high-efficiency equipment (IE3/IE4 motors) supports energy efficiency, especially relevant in manufacturing, where motors account for up to 70% of electricity use [48]. A detailed energy audit is essential prior to investment. Use of smart metres (IoT-based) enables real-time tracking and anomaly detection.

○

Leakage of Air Conditioning Refrigerants

This issue, while ranked low (+), has disproportionately high climate implications due to the high global warming potential (GWP) of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). Transitioning to low-GWP alternatives (e.g., R-290) and adopting preventive maintenance aligns with the Kigali Amendment under the Montreal Protocol [59].

5. Discussion

5.1. Critical Interpretation of Results and Their Local Significance

The environmental management assessment conducted at BOCOM Petroleum reveals a strategic alignment with contemporary sustainability practices, particularly in the identification and mitigation of key emission sources. The prioritisation of activities such as laboratory chemical processes, stationary combustion, and the manufacturing of gas storage cylinders underscores a targeted approach towards significant emission contributors. The implementation of clean technologies and energy-efficient equipment, as proposed, is consistent with global best practices aimed at reducing industrial carbon footprints. Specifically, the transition to high-efficiency equipment, such as IE3/IE4 motors, is a well-established method for enhancing energy efficiency in industrial settings. The International Energy Agency (IEA) highlights that electric motor systems account for approximately 70% of industrial electricity consumption, and upgrading to energy-efficient motors can lead to substantial energy savings [53]. This aligns with BOCOM Petroleum’s objective to reduce electrical consumption through equipment upgrades.

In addressing waste management, the promotion of recycling and reuse initiatives reflects a commitment to the principles of the circular economy. Ghisellini et al. (2016) emphasise that transitioning to a circular economy involves not only recycling but also rethinking product design and consumption patterns to minimise waste generation [57]. BOCOM Petroleum’s measures to implement on-site recycling programmes and engage with recycling partners are steps towards this holistic approach. However, the assessment also identifies areas requiring further development, particularly in the comprehensive accounting of Scope 3 emissions, which include indirect emissions from the value chain. UNEP argues that focusing solely on direct emissions can lead to underestimating a company’s total environmental impact [55]. Therefore, expanding the scope of emission assessments to include upstream and downstream activities is crucial for a more accurate and effective sustainability strategy.

In summary, BOCOM Petroleum’s environmental management plan demonstrates a proactive stance in adopting energy-efficient technologies and waste reduction practices. To enhance the effectiveness of these initiatives, it is recommended to broaden the emission assessment scope, integrate comprehensive monitoring systems, and align strategies with international sustainability frameworks.

5.2. Regional and African Implications of BOCOM Petroleum’s Decarbonisation Strategy

The decarbonisation measures implemented by BOCOM Petroleum are not only relevant at the company level but also bear significant implications for regional and continental environmental sustainability goals in Sub-Saharan Africa. Industrial emissions in Africa, although comparatively lower than global averages, are expected to rise sharply due to ongoing industrialisation and urbanisation trends [60]. Thus, early adoption of clean technologies and sustainable waste management practices, as demonstrated by BOCOM Petroleum, offers a replicable model for other oil and gas enterprises across the continent. One of the major regional challenges is the limited integration of sustainability frameworks into corporate strategies, often due to regulatory gaps, limited financial resources, and weak institutional enforcement. In this context, BOCOM Petroleum’s investment in energy audits, high-efficiency machinery (e.g., IE3/IE4 motors), and the adoption of low global warming potential (GWP) refrigerants (such as R-290 and R-32) sets an important precedent. These choices align with the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, which advocates for a global phase-down of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)—a commitment ratified by over 130 countries, including Cameroon [59].

Furthermore, BOCOM Petroleum’s emphasis on managing Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions is pivotal, especially given the weak carbon accounting infrastructure in the Central African region. A regional comparison with South Africa, where mandatory carbon tax and greenhouse gas reporting frameworks exist [61], underscores the potential for policy transfer and harmonisation. If Cameroon and its regional partners adopt similar fiscal or regulatory incentives, this could accelerate low-carbon industrial transitions. Additionally, the circular economy elements integrated into BOCOM Petroleum’s waste management—particularly recycling and reusing materials—are aligned with the African Union’s Agenda 2063, which promotes sustainable resource management and green industrialisation [62]. Replicating such initiatives could help reduce Africa’s dependence on landfilling and mitigate the environmental risks of hazardous industrial waste.

In essence, the decarbonisation pathway pursued by BOCOM Petroleum, though company-specific, serves as a regional benchmark. If scaled and supported by coherent policies and knowledge sharing, such practices could significantly contribute to the continent’s efforts to meet its nationally determined contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement.

5.3. Alignment with Cameroon’s Legal and Institutional Frameworks: Current Status and Long-Term Projections

The decarbonisation initiatives undertaken by BOCOM Petroleum resonate significantly with Cameroon’s evolving legal and institutional architecture for environmental governance. At present, Cameroon’s climate and energy policies are framed within the National Climate Change Adaptation Plan [63] and the updated Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) submitted under the Paris Agreement. These frameworks articulate ambitions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 32% by 2035, particularly through industrial energy efficiency and low-emission technologies. BOCOM Petroleum’s strategic shift towards energy-efficient equipment, emission monitoring, and low-carbon fuels directly supports these commitments. Institutionally, the Ministry of Environment, Nature Protection and Sustainable Development (MINEPDED) is responsible for implementing national climate objectives. Although environmental impact assessments (EIAs) and audits are required under Law No. 96/12 of 5 August 1996 (Environmental Management Law), enforcement has often been hampered by limited technical capacity and inadequate compliance monitoring [9]. However, the internal environmental audit practices initiated by BOCOM Petroleum—such as semi-annual assessments and the use of GHG tracking tools—exceed existing national enforcement standards and offer a model for voluntary corporate climate governance in Cameroon. Looking forward, integrating corporate decarbonisation within long-term national strategies will be essential. Cameroon’s 2030 Emergence Plan outlines a trajectory for industrial expansion, yet without stringent environmental safeguards, such expansion could exacerbate emissions. In this regard, enterprises like BOCOM Petroleum can pioneer climate-conscious industrialisation, especially if incentivised by green tax credits, carbon pricing mechanisms, or subsidies for clean technology—policy instruments already being explored in neighbouring economies like Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana [64]. Moreover, the decentralisation of environmental governance through municipal climate plans—as encouraged by the Cameroon Climate Change Observatory—opens new opportunities for replicating BOCOM Petroleum’s approach at sub-national levels. Long-term, the mainstreaming of such initiatives could culminate in the establishment of sector-specific carbon reduction benchmarks and reporting obligations, further embedding sustainability into Cameroon’s industrial fabric.

In sum, the decarbonisation efforts of BOCOM Petroleum not only comply with current national environmental policies but also anticipate future regulatory developments. This forward-looking approach enhances the company’s resilience and positions it as a leader in Cameroon’s industrial transition towards a low-carbon economy.

5.4. Strategic and Environmental Advantages of Decarbonising Industrial Enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa

The decarbonisation of industrial operations, such as those undertaken by BOCOM Petroleum, offers both strategic and environmental advantages, particularly in the context of Sub-Saharan Africa’s dual need for industrial growth and climate resilience. From a strategic standpoint, companies that adopt low-carbon technologies and environmental accountability mechanisms enhance their operational efficiency and market competitiveness. The transition to energy-efficient machinery, waste minimization systems, and cleaner fuels reduces operational costs over time by lowering energy bills, material losses, and compliance risks [48]. For instance, the International Energy Agency has shown that investments in industrial energy efficiency yield savings ranging from 10% to 30% in energy expenditures, especially in developing contexts with ageing industrial infrastructure.

On the environmental front, decarbonization reduces the ecological footprint of industrial activities, including greenhouse gas emissions, waste generation, and pollutant release into air and water systems. BOCOM Petroleum’s actions—such as the replacement of refrigerants with low-GWP alternatives, the use of hybrid vehicles, and the recycling of industrial materials—mitigate both Scope 1 and Scope 3 emissions, thereby contributing to the broader climate objectives of the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) and SDG 13 (Climate Action) [59].

Furthermore, early adoption of decarbonization strategies positions firms to benefit from emerging green finance mechanisms and climate funds. Instruments such as the Green Climate Fund (GCF) and regional climate finance initiatives are increasingly prioritising private sector projects that demonstrate tangible emissions reductions and sustainable production models [65]. BOCOM Petroleum could thus access blended finance or concessional funding by aligning its environmental performance with international benchmarks such as ISO 14064 and the GHG Protocol.

Crucially, in the African context, the ripple effects of industrial decarbonization go beyond corporate benefits. They offer co-benefits in terms of public health (via improved air quality), job creation in the green technology sector, and knowledge transfer. Studies indicate that investing in clean industrial technologies creates up to three times more employment per dollar spent compared to fossil fuel investments. Thus, BOCOM Petroleum’s experience presents a replicable model for other oil and gas firms in Sub-Saharan Africa, potentially catalysing a sector-wide shift towards sustainable industrialisation.

5.5. International Comparison and Benchmarking

The emission profile observed at BOCOM Petroleum is broadly consistent with patterns reported in international studies applying Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) across the oil and gas value chain. Several studies highlight the dominant contribution of indirect emissions, particularly Scope 3, in overall carbon footprints, especially when full life-cycle boundaries are considered [66]. In addition, LCA analyses of petroleum systems integrating upstream, midstream, and downstream activities report significantly higher emission magnitudes due to the inclusion of extraction and processing stages [67]. Another recent LCA study on crude oil and natural gas production systems reported global warming impacts exceeding 78 million CO₂, kg/year when upstream processes are included [68]. In contrast, studies focusing on specific subsystems such as fuel distribution or wastewater management in the petroleum industry show comparatively lower emissions due to narrower system boundaries [69].

Therefore, the relatively lower emissions observed in this study reflect the downstream scope and limited operational scale of BOCOM Petroleum. This comparison confirms that emission magnitudes and structures vary significantly depending on system boundaries and operational segments. It also underscores the importance of context-specific and scale-sensitive decarbonisation strategies in Sub-Saharan African downstream oil companies.

5.6. Limitation of Framework

While the proposed methodological framework provides a robust and replicable approach for assessing emissions in downstream oil operations, it does not fully capture the complexity of upstream oil and gas systems. Activities such as extraction, flaring, and reservoir emissions require more advanced modelling approaches and significantly different data inputs. Therefore, the applicability of the framework is currently limited to downstream and midstream operations. Future research should aim to extend this framework by integrating upstream emission modules to provide a more comprehensive sector-wide assessment.

6. Conclusions

This study aimed to assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and environmental footprint of BOCOM Petroleum, a medium-sized oil company operating in the downstream sector in Cameroon. Three specific objectives were pursued: (i) to identify the main sources of GHG emissions in the company’s operations; (ii) to quantify its overall carbon footprint using methods compliant with ISO 14044 and the GHG Protocol; and (iii) to propose a strategic environmental management plan based on reliable empirical data. The results highlighted an emissions structure dominated by indirect sources (Scope 3: 38%), followed by emissions related to electricity consumption (Scope 2: 33%) and direct emissions (Scope 1: 29%). The activities with the highest emissions are stationary combustion, chemical processes in laboratories and the use of low-efficiency thermal equipment. These data reveal a high dependence on fossil fuels, significant energy inefficiency and a persistent underestimation of emissions in supply chains.

In response to this assessment, a detailed Environmental Management Plan (EMP) has been developed, incorporating short-, medium- and long-term measures. Proposed actions include the modernization of thermal equipment, the introduction of energy-efficient technologies, the partial electrification of the logistics fleet, the substitution of high-GWP (global warming potential) refrigerants, and the implementation of an industrial waste recycling system. These measures are aligned with Cameroon’s climate objectives and the commitments made under the Paris Agreement.

However, the study has certain limitations. The availability of primary data, particularly on fugitive emissions and specific consumption per piece of equipment, remains partial. Furthermore, the economic costs of implementing the proposed measures have not been assessed in this study, thus limiting the ability to prioritise actions according to their cost-effectiveness. It therefore seems essential, as a follow-up to this research, to carry out a comprehensive financial assessment of the Environmental Management Plan. This should include cost–benefit analyses, return on investment times, and opportunities for access to green financing (climate funds, preferential credit lines, carbon offset mechanisms). Such a financial component would not only support managerial decisions but also strengthen the case for low-carbon industrialisation in sub-Saharan Africa.

Ultimately, the approach adopted by BOCOM Petroleum constitutes a crucial methodological and strategic reference for the decarbonization of industrial companies in middle-income African countries. Its transposition to other companies in the oil sector could contribute significantly to achieving Cameroon’s nationally determined contributions (NDCs), while positioning the company in a dynamic of environmental performance and sustainable innovation. Future research should also focus on integrating techno-economic analyses, including cost–benefit assessments, investment requirements, and implementation timelines.