1. Introduction
Atmospheric pollutants such as ozone (O
3), nitrogen dioxide (NO
2), and sulfur dioxide (SO
2) are key contributors to environmental degradation and public health risks. While their dynamics are well documented in continental regions, their behavior in remote island environments, particularly those exposed to oceanic and synoptic scale influences, remains underexplored. In these remote Atlantic environments, long-range transport and large-scale atmospheric circulation may dominate over local emissions, especially for secondary pollutants like ozone. Long-term observational records show that baseline ozone concentrations in the lower troposphere have been gradually increasing across the Northern Hemisphere over recent decades. Ref. [
1] identified persistent upward trends in background ozone levels, attributed, in part, to hemispheric-scale transport and global precursor emissions. These trends underscore the importance of investigating the synoptic and interannual factors, such as the North Atlantic Oscillation, that may modulate or amplify ozone variability in remote locations. Due to their remote oceanic location, low population density, and limited industrial activity, the Azores offer an ideal setting to assess climate-driven modulation of surface pollutants. Official monitoring data from São Miguel Island (2017–2021) confirm the absence of legal exceedances for O
3, NO
2, and SO
2, highlighting the region’s suitability as a natural atmospheric observatory.
In the North Atlantic sector, the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) represents the dominant mode of interannual climate variability. It modulates storm tracks, wind patterns, and vertical motion, thereby influencing cloudiness, solar radiation, and the long-range transport or stagnation of air masses. Ref. [
2] identified a strong relationship between NAO phases and the transatlantic transport of anthropogenic ozone, showing that positive NAO conditions enhance pollutant export from North America to the North Atlantic. Several studies have established associations between NAO phases and air pollution episodes in mainland Europe and North America. For instance, ref. [
3] showed that during positive NAO phases, surface ozone increases by 6–10 parts per billion volume (ppbv) across northern Europe, whereas negative phases lead to reductions of 4–10 ppbv due to weakened westerlies and pollutant accumulation. Similarly, ref. [
4] used satellite data and model simulations to demonstrate that NAO-positive phases are associated with enhanced ozone concentrations and reduced NO
2 levels over Europe, driven by stronger westerly circulation patterns that disperse primary pollutants and transport ozone-rich air from the Atlantic. Also, ref. [
5] concluded that the influence of the North Atlantic Oscillation on air pollutant variability has been documented across the North Atlantic region. In the Azores, data from Faial (2006–2014) show that positive NAO phases are associated with higher tropospheric O
3 concentrations in all seasons, indicating a seasonal modulation of background ozone potentially driven by synoptic-scale transport patterns. Additionally, ref. [
2] identified a strong correlation (r ≈ 0.57 overall; r ≈ 0.72 in spring) between the NAO and the transatlantic transport of anthropogenic ozone observed at Sable Island (North Atlantic), highlighting the influence of the NAO on the seasonal modulation of ozone. This mechanism was further quantified by [
6], who demonstrated through 5-year GEOS-CHEM simulations that positive NAO phases enhance the transatlantic transport of North American ozone, contributing up to 10–20 ppbv to surface ozone levels in Europe during major events. Their results also suggest that up to 20% of European air quality standard exceedances (55 ppbv (8 h average)) in the summer of 1997 would not have occurred without this transatlantic influence. This finding was further supported by [
7], who used regional chemistry–climate models to show that positive NAO phases enhance the zonal transport of air pollutants across the North Atlantic, while negative NAO phases promote stagnation and accumulation of pollutants over Europe and adjacent oceanic regions. Despite several studies linking NAO phases to ozone variability in continental and regional contexts, there remains a notable gap in quantitative modeling focused specifically on mid-oceanic island environments such as the Azores. Most existing work in the region is based on descriptive analyses or limited temporal records. To date, few studies have employed atmospheric chemistry transport models (CTMs) or regression-based statistical frameworks to assess how NAO modulates pollutant behavior over isolated oceanic locations. Comparable research in other island regions, such as the Canary Islands or Madeira, could serve as valuable analogs. For example, regional-scale modeling over the eastern North Atlantic has shown that NAO-driven circulation patterns significantly influence background ozone levels and long-range pollutant advection in these archipelagos [
8,
9]. These findings reinforce the need to investigate similar mechanisms over the Azores, which occupy a uniquely strategic position within the NAO pressure dipole and are frequently exposed to transatlantic air masses. These dynamics are particularly relevant for understanding pollutant behavior in the mid-Atlantic environment of the Azores. However, the influence of the NAO on pollutant levels in small oceanic islands remains poorly understood. These atmospheric teleconnections extend beyond ozone: Ref. [
10] highlighted the synergistic influence of the NAO on the variability of aerosols and trace gases such as O
3 and CO, emphasizing that large-scale circulation patterns strongly modulate atmospheric composition over the North Atlantic region. Recent studies have extended this understanding to other classes of air pollutants. Ref. [
11] found that positive phases of the NAO significantly reduce benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) concentrations across Europe, especially in western and Atlantic-influenced regions. These results highlight the generality of NAO-induced dispersion mechanisms affecting various pollutant types. Ref. [
12] further demonstrated that the NAO significantly influences the precipitation regime in the Azores, particularly in Ponta Delgada, with distinct impacts observed in both winter and summer seasons. These regional effects reinforce the relevance of investigating whether the NAO also plays a role in modulating surface concentrations of key air pollutants in the Azorean atmosphere. In addition to synoptic influences, local factors such as topography and vertical mixing also play an important role in ozone variability. Ref. [
13] demonstrated that altitude exerts a measurable influence on lower tropospheric ozone levels across western Europe, with significant vertical gradients and temporal variability. Such findings emphasize the need to consider both regional-scale circulation and orographic effects in interpreting ozone behavior in complex atmospheric environments like the Azores.
The Azores archipelago, located at the approximate nodal point of the NAO pressure dipole, is uniquely positioned to assess the synoptic control of pollutant variability in a remote marine-influenced context. São Miguel Island, the largest and most urbanized in the archipelago, presents contrasting emission profiles and meteorological regimes suitable for such analysis. Unlike continental regions where pollutant dynamics are heavily influenced by dense urbanization and industrial activity, the Azores provide a clean-air laboratory setting due to their geographic isolation, low emission intensity, and sparse population. This minimal anthropogenic background reduces the influence of local confounders and enhances the clarity of the statistical signal associated with large-scale climatic drivers such as NAO. As such, the archipelago represents a uniquely suitable site to isolate synoptic-scale influences on surface pollutant variability.
This study aimed to quantify the relationship between NAO index values and surface concentrations of O3, NO2, and SO2 on São Miguel Island from 2017 to 2021. A total of 1826 daily observations per station were analyzed. By combining descriptive analysis, seasonal correlation, and robust linear regression models, we assessed how large-scale atmospheric variability modulates pollutant behavior across urban and semi-urban sites in the mid-North Atlantic.
2. Materials and Methods
This section describes the data sources, monitoring sites, and statistical methods used to investigate the relationship between North Atlantic Oscillation phases and air pollutant concentrations in the Azores. We used validated air quality and meteorological data from two monitoring stations on São Miguel Island between 2017 and 2021. The analysis included descriptive statistics, seasonal correlation, and robust regression models, aimed at quantifying the influence of synoptic-scale variability on surface levels of O3, NO2, and SO2.
This study was conducted on São Miguel Island, the largest and most populated island of the Azores archipelago (Portugal), located in the mid-North Atlantic. The Azores are a Portuguese archipelago located in the North Atlantic Ocean, between approximately 36°55′ and 39°43′ N latitude and 24°46′ to 31°16′ W longitude. The archipelago comprises nine volcanic islands, geographically divided into three groups: the Eastern Group (São Miguel and Santa Maria), the Central Group (Terceira, Graciosa, São Jorge, Pico, and Faial), and the Western Group (Flores and Corvo). Situated roughly 1500 km west of Lisbon and about 3900 km from the eastern coast of North America, the Azores occupy a strategic mid-Atlantic position, as illustrated in
Figure 1. This location, combined with the island’s volcanic origin and oceanic isolation, makes the Azores a unique natural laboratory for atmospheric, oceanographic, and climate studies.
The Azores Archipelago, encompassing a total area of 2322 km2, is strongly influenced by the Azores High, a semi-permanent subtropical high-pressure system situated over the North Atlantic. This atmospheric feature exerts a dominant control over the regional climate of the archipelago and affects broader atmospheric circulation patterns across the North Atlantic basin. Its presence shapes key meteorological conditions such as wind regimes, cloud cover, and precipitation distribution throughout the year.
2.1. Data Sources and Monitoring Sites
Two official air quality monitoring stations were selected for analysis. To characterize air quality in the Azores Autonomous Region, we used official data reported in the Air Quality Reports of the Azores 2017–2021, published by the Regional Secretariat for the Environment and Climate Action [
14,
15,
16,
17,
18]. These reports provide continuous measurements of atmospheric pollutants, including ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and particulate matter (PM
10 and PM
2.5) collected from two fixed stations located on São Miguel Island: São Gonçalo (urban background) and Ribeira Grande (urban traffic).
The São Gonçalo station, located in Ponta Delgada, is representative of urban background exposure, while the Ribeira Grande station reflects traffic-influenced conditions. This dual typology enables a comparative assessment of pollutant behavior under distinct urban dynamics. Both stations have been part of the regional air monitoring network since 2012.
These official reports also include meteorological parameters such as temperature, solar radiation, and wind direction, which are essential for understanding the photochemical formation and dispersion of tropospheric ozone. The consistent predominance of SE–SSW winds and the seasonal peaks in radiation observed in São Miguel support the evaluation of climatic modulation mechanisms such as the North Atlantic Oscillation.
Notably, no exceedances of legal thresholds for O3, NO2, or SO2 were recorded in any of the analyzed years, further reinforcing the status of the Azores as a natural atmospheric laboratory. This context favors the investigation of large-scale climate influences, minimizing confounding effects from local anthropogenic emissions.
The monitoring infrastructure used in this study is illustrated in
Figure 2.
Both stations are operated by the Regional Secretariat for the Environment and Climate Change (RSECC) of the Azorean Government and follow the European Air Quality Directive Requirements.
The daily mean surface concentrations (24 h averages) of O
3, NO
2, and SO
2 were collected from both stations for the period spanning from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 (
https://ambiente.azores.gov.pt/qualidadedoar/DadosValidados.aspx) (accessed on 28 May 2025). Data were obtained in µg/m
3 and had been previously validated by the Regional Secretariat for the Environment and Climate Change (RSECC) according to established quality control protocols before being processed for statistical analysis. All pollutant measurements were previously validated and quality-assured by the Regional Secretariat for the Environment and Climate Change, in compliance with EU data validation protocols. The monitoring stations are equipped with automatic analyzers that enable continuous and real-time measurements. Each pollutant is measured using a dedicated analyzer and its corresponding measurement principle. For SO
2, the UV fluorescence method is used, certified under TUV Report 936/21206773/C, in accordance with EN 14212; for NO
2, the chemiluminescence method is applied, certified under TUV Report 936/21205818/C, in accordance with EN 14211; and for O
3, the UV absorption method is employed, certified under TUV Report 936/21205818/C, in accordance with EN 14625.
No missing data were detected in the O3 series for São Gonçalo or Ribeira Grande, ensuring uninterrupted time series analysis. Minor gaps in the NO2 and SO2 datasets (<2% of values) were addressed using linear interpolation, thereby preserving continuity without significantly affecting overall temporal variability or trend structure.
The daily NAO index used in this study was retrieved from the NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory (
https://psl.noaa.gov/data/timeseries/daily/NAO/) (accessed on 28 May 2025). The index is derived from the difference in normalized sea level pressure between Lisbon, Portugal, and Stykkishólmur/Reykjavík, Iceland, for the period spanning from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. The NAO index, retrieved from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Physical Sciences Laboratory, is already normalized by definition and was used in its original form without additional transformation. Pollutant concentrations (O
3, NO
2, and SO
2) were analyzed in their reported units (µg/m
3), without the application of smoothing, detrending, or normalization procedures. This approach ensured the interpretability of the model coefficients while preserving the natural variability present in the original time series. Although 2020 was an atypical year due to pandemic-related restrictions, no significant anomalies or data discontinuities were observed in the pollutant time series for that year. The inclusion of 2020 was retained for completeness, and the use of robust regression methods ensured that any isolated effects did not bias the results.
2.2. Statistical Analysis and Modeling Approach
All datasets were merged based on their respective daily timestamps. Descriptive statistics, seasonal averages, Pearson correlations by season, and robust linear regression (RLM) models were performed in Python. The RLM included the following predictors: NAO index, month (categorical), and season (categorical). The model assumptions were verified via residual analysis. Robust linear regression was performed using the RLM function from the statsmodels Python library (version 0.14.0), with Huber weighting to minimize the influence of outliers and ensure reliable estimation under non-normal error distributions. The following equations detail the statistical formulations used in this study, including the Pearson correlation coefficient (Equation (1)), the structure of the robust linear regression model (Equation (2)), and the Huber loss function applied for robust coefficient estimation (Equation (3)).
The Pearson correlation coefficient (
r) used to measure the linear association between the NAO index and pollutant concentrations is calculated as
where
represents the NAO index,
the pollutant concentration,
and
the respective means, and
n the number of observations.
The robust linear model takes the following form:
where
is the observed value of the dependent variable (the daily concentration of O
3, NO
2, or SO
2) on day
i,
represents the expected value of
y when all predictors are zero,
is the estimated effect of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index on day I,
is the estimated effect of the calendar month (categorical variable), capturing monthly variation,
is the estimated effect of the meteorological season (categorical variable: winter, spring, etc.), and
is the random error term (residual) on day
i, representing the unexplained variability in
.
The regression coefficients were estimated by minimizing the Huber loss function:
where
u is the residual, and
δ is the tuning constant (1.345 by default in statsmodels).
Given the presence of moderate day-to-day variability in pollutant concentrations and the potential influence of extreme meteorological or emission events, particularly in a remote island environment, an RLM approach was adopted instead of ordinary least squares (OLS). The RLM is less sensitive to outliers and heteroscedasticity, offering more stable and reliable coefficient estimates when classical assumptions of OLS may not be met. This makes the RLM especially suitable for environmental time series that may contain irregular disturbances.
Although direct measurements of vertical motion or boundary layer height were not available in this study, the observed statistical patterns are consistent with previously documented NAO-related mechanisms involving enhanced photolysis, subsidence, and pollutant dispersion [
2,
3,
4]. These references provide a physical basis for the synoptic-scale interpretation developed in the Discussion.
4. Discussion
The findings of this study provide robust statistical and physical evidence that the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) significantly modulates surface-level pollutant concentrations in the mid-Atlantic island environment of the Azores. We begin by examining the statistical patterns observed in pollutant concentrations. The descriptive statistics of the daily mean concentrations for O3, NO2, and SO2 measured at the SG and RG stations between 2017 and 2021 showed that O3 exhibited the highest average concentrations among the three pollutants, with notably higher values in SG (83.1 µg/m3) compared with RG (77.3 µg/m3), reflecting the influence of urban background levels and potentially greater photochemical activity in Ponta Delgada. NO2 also followed this urban–semi-urban contrast, with mean concentrations of 21.4 µg/m3 in SG and 15.8 µg/m3 in RG, indicative of higher vehicular emissions in the city. In contrast, SO2 levels were relatively low at both sites, with slightly higher values observed in RG (4.7 µg/m3), possibly due to localized episodic sources or varying atmospheric dispersion conditions. The standard deviations revealed moderate day-to-day variability, especially for O3, aligning with its sensitivity to meteorological conditions and long-range transport.
The time series of pollutant concentrations at the São Gonçalo station (
Figure 3) further illustrates the distinct temporal behavior of O
3, NO
2, and SO
2 in an urban context. Ozone displayed a marked seasonal cycle, with sustained spring and summer peaks likely driven by enhanced photochemical activity under increased solar radiation. In contrast, NO
2 concentrations were characterized by sharp, short-lived spikes, indicative of traffic-related emissions and local variability. SO
2 remained consistently low, with minor fluctuations suggesting limited and episodic local sources. These temporal profiles support the statistical results and highlight the differing sensitivity of each pollutant to both emission patterns and meteorological influences. Following the urban profile of São Gonçalo, the time series from Ribeira Grande offers insight into pollutant variability under less densely populated conditions.
A corresponding analysis at the Ribeira Grande station provides additional perspective on pollutant variability in a less urbanized setting. The pollutant time series at the Ribeira Grande station (
Figure 4) revealed temporal dynamics distinct from those observed in São Gonçalo. O
3 remained the dominant compound throughout the period, also exhibiting a clear seasonal cycle, though with slightly lower amplitudes compared with the urban site. NO
2 concentrations were generally lower and more stable, reflecting reduced traffic emissions in this semi-urban area. SO
2 showed modest variability, with occasional peaks suggesting the presence of sporadic local sources or variations in atmospheric dispersion. These patterns underscore the influence of site typology on pollutant behavior and help explain the weaker statistical associations observed for some pollutants at this location.
The contrast in O
3 responses between São Gonçalo and Ribeira Grande underscores the role of local urban influences and emission backgrounds. São Gonçalo, being more densely urbanized, is subject to higher NO emissions, which can contribute to ozone titration under stable atmospheric conditions. Long-term observational records and chemistry–climate model simulations have shown that baseline ozone levels have been increasing across the Northern Hemisphere. As proposed by [
1], persistent upward trends in lower tropospheric ozone concentrations over the past decades have been driven, in part, by hemispheric-scale transport of precursors and transcontinental pollution, which are not always well captured by current models.
The temporal evolution of the NAO index during the study period (
Figure 5) reveals significant intra- and interannual variability, with frequent alternations between positive and negative phases. As expected, the strongest and most persistent NAO signals occurred during winter months, reflecting the climatological dominance of the NAO in shaping North Atlantic circulation during this season. This dynamic variability underlines the relevance of using daily NAO data to assess pollutant behavior in the Azores, as short-term oscillations can influence atmospheric transport, vertical mixing, and photochemical conditions. The correspondence between periods of sustained NAO positivity and elevated ozone levels observed in spring and summer further supports the hypothesis that large-scale synoptic forcing plays a key role in modulating air quality in island environments.
During positive NAO phases, the Azores region is generally influenced by a stronger and more northeasterly-displaced Azores High, which promotes subsidence and atmospheric stability. Recent paleoclimate reconstructions proposed by [
19] show that the 20th-century expansion of the Azores High is unprecedented over the past 1200 years. This anomalous expansion likely enhances the persistence of synoptic regimes that favor ozone accumulation in the mid-Atlantic, further supporting the relevance of assessing pollutant–climate interactions in the Azores. This dynamic suppresses cloud formation and leads to increased solar radiation reaching the surface. Enhanced solar irradiance intensifies the photolytic decomposition of NO
2, accelerating O
3 formation in the presence of its precursors. Thus, the reduced cloudiness associated with NAO-positive regimes provides more favorable photochemical conditions for ozone production, especially in the urban context of São Gonçalo, where precursor availability is higher. In addition to seasonal controls, several meteorological variables underpin the synoptic-scale modulation of pollutant concentrations observed in this study. NAO-positive phases are typically associated with increased solar radiation, which enhances the photolytic conversion of NO
2 into O
3. Stronger wind speeds and more persistent westerly flow during these periods also promote horizontal and vertical mixing, reducing NO
2 accumulation. Although direct boundary layer height measurements were not available, the inferred meteorological regimes suggest that NAO-related changes in atmospheric stability and mixing depth play a key role in shaping pollutant concentrations. These dynamics are particularly relevant in the urban context of São Gonçalo, where local emissions interact with broader circulation patterns. Moreover, the relatively low anthropogenic emission background of São Miguel Island provides a cleaner atmospheric setting compared with continental regions. This enhances the detectability of synoptic-scale signals such as those driven by the NAO, as local confounding influences are minimized. Such a mid-latitude island environment, thus, offers unique advantages for attributing pollutant variability to large-scale climatic drivers. These mechanisms are further supported by [
20], who showed that the interaction between ozone precursors and meteorological variability plays a central role in regional ozone formation dynamics. Their findings underscore the influence of synoptic-scale drivers such as the NAO on the seasonal modulation of ozone in marine-influenced environments.
Our study also stands out for its methodological design. It combined multi-year, high-resolution air quality observations from two monitoring stations with contrasting emission contexts and applied robust statistical modeling to isolate synoptic-scale influences. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate NAO–pollution linkages using paired urban and semi-urban observations in a mid-latitude island setting with minimal anthropogenic interference. This approach enables a more nuanced interpretation of compound-specific responses to large-scale atmospheric variability.
The stronger NAO signal observed at the São Gonçalo station is likely related to its urban background setting in Ponta Delgada, where emission sources such as traffic and residential combustion are relatively stable and concentrated. In contrast, Ribeira Grande represents a semi-urban area with lower traffic volumes, more dispersed land use, and proximity to rural or geothermal zones, which may contribute to sporadic emissions not fully captured in the statistical model. The larger residuals observed at this site (
Figure 11) may reflect uncontrolled local sources or microclimatic variability associated with topography or wind-channeling effects. These contrasts emphasize the importance of local context when interpreting the sensitivity of pollutant concentrations to synoptic-scale drivers such as the NAO.
The seasonal boxplots shown in
Figure 7 provide additional insight into the pollutant dynamics observed in São Miguel Island. O
3 concentrations displayed higher medians and upper quartiles in São Gonçalo compared with Ribeira Grande, particularly during spring and summer, suggesting stronger photochemical activity in the urban background environment. NO
2 exhibited a distinctly urban profile, with significantly higher values in São Gonçalo, especially in winter, reflecting increased combustion-related emissions and weaker atmospheric dispersion during colder months. SO
2 levels remained low at both sites and did not show a clear seasonal pattern, although slightly greater variability in Ribeira Grande may point to sporadic local sources. These seasonal distributions support the statistical findings and confirm that pollutant sensitivity to meteorological and synoptic drivers varies according to compound type and local context.
The seasonal Pearson correlation coefficients presented in
Table 2 offer initial statistical evidence of the relationship between NAO variability and pollutant concentrations. Ozone exhibited consistently positive correlations with the NAO index across all seasons, particularly in São Gonçalo during summer (r = 0.23) and spring (r = 0.18), suggesting enhanced photochemical production under NAO-positive regimes. Conversely, NO
2 concentrations were negatively correlated with NAO, most strongly in São Gonçalo during summer (r = –0.40), reflecting increased atmospheric dispersion during periods of stronger westerly circulation. These seasonal patterns support the compound-specific influence of NAO phases and align with the more detailed findings from the regression analysis. In contrast, SO
2 correlations remained weak and inconsistent at both sites and across all seasons, indicating minimal sensitivity to synoptic-scale forcing. These preliminary associations were further explored through regression modeling, which allowed for a more precise estimation of the NAO’s impact after controlling for temporal factors.
The regression coefficients presented in
Table 3 quantify the extent to which daily pollutant concentrations respond to variations in the NAO index, controlling for seasonal and monthly effects. Ozone showed a strong and statistically significant positive association with NAO at both monitoring sites, particularly in São Gonçalo (β = +1.98;
p < 0.001), suggesting that NAO-positive conditions contribute to elevated ozone levels through enhanced solar radiation and atmospheric stability. Nitrogen dioxide displayed a significant negative relationship with NAO only in São Gonçalo (β = –1.52;
p < 0.001), indicating increased pollutant dispersion in the urban area in NAO-positive phases. In Ribeira Grande, this relationship was weaker and not statistically significant, possibly reflecting reduced emission intensity or greater meteorological variability. Sulfur dioxide exhibited no meaningful association with the NAO index at either site, further supporting the interpretation that its variability is driven by local, episodic sources rather than large-scale atmospheric circulation. These results reinforce the pollutant-specific and context-dependent nature of NAO–pollution interactions in oceanic island settings.
To complement the descriptive insights, regression analysis was employed to isolate and quantify the specific influence of the NAO on pollutant behavior. The predictive relationships between ozone concentrations and the NAO index, as illustrated in
Figure 8, confirmed a statistically significant positive association at both monitoring stations. São Gonçalo exhibited a steeper slope, indicating a stronger sensitivity of ozone levels to NAO-positive conditions in the urban background environment. This response likely reflects the combined effect of enhanced subsidence, increased solar radiation, and the availability of precursors, which together promote photochemical ozone formation during NAO-positive phases. The narrower confidence intervals observed in São Gonçalo further support the reliability of this relationship, suggesting that large-scale synoptic forcing exerts a more pronounced influence on ozone dynamics in the urban sector of São Miguel Island.
While ozone responded positively to NAO variability, a different behavior was observed for nitrogen dioxide.
Figure 9 illustrates the inverse relationship between the NAO index and nitrogen dioxide concentrations, particularly evident in São Gonçalo. The robust regression model indicates that NO
2 levels tend to decrease under NAO-positive conditions, likely due to enhanced atmospheric dispersion and vertical mixing driven by a stronger westerly flow. This behavior reflects the sensitivity of traffic-related pollutants to synoptic-scale ventilation regimes, especially in urban settings where emission densities are high. In contrast, the weaker and non-significant association observed in Ribeira Grande suggests that NO
2 dynamics in semi-urban areas may be more influenced by local factors and less responsive to large-scale circulation patterns. These findings align with previous studies highlighting the dilution of primary pollutants during NAO-positive phases across Europe.
The analysis now turns to sulfur dioxide, whose association with NAO differed substantially from the patterns observed for ozone and nitrogen dioxide. The regression results for sulfur dioxide presented in
Figure 10 reveal weak and statistically non-significant associations with the NAO index at both monitoring sites. The near-horizontal slopes and wide confidence intervals suggest that SO
2 concentrations in São Miguel are not strongly modulated by synoptic-scale variability.
These results suggest that SO2 concentrations are primarily influenced by intermittent and spatially localized emission sources, which are poorly captured by synoptic-scale indicators such as the NAO. According to the Azores State of the Environment Reports, industrial SO2 emissions in the region are minimal, and most exceedances recorded in air quality monitoring campaigns involve particulate matter, not sulfur dioxide.
Likely contributors to the observed SO2 levels include maritime emissions from cargo and cruise ships, air traffic near the airport, road transportation using diesel fuels, occasional domestic combustion, and residual geothermal activity in areas like Ribeira Grande and Furnas. While individually minor, these sources can collectively influence short-term SO2 concentrations.
Moreover, seasonal tourism patterns may play a role in amplifying SO2 emissions, particularly during the summer high season when air and sea transport increase markedly, along with local energy consumption in hotels and restaurants. This dynamic, although plausible, remains difficult to quantify due to the lack of high-resolution emissions inventories.
These characteristics, low intensity, spatial variability, and limited persistence, explain the absence of strong and consistent associations with the NAO index. Additionally, SO2’s short atmospheric lifetime and poor long-range transport potential contribute to its decoupling from broader synoptic-scale atmospheric forcing, especially when compared with photochemically active or secondary pollutants such as ozone.
Instead, the temporal behavior of SO2 appears to be governed by localized and episodic emission sources, such as small-scale combustion or potentially sporadic atmospheric transport events. This contrasts with the more predictable responses observed for ozone and NO2, underscoring the compound-specific nature of NAO–pollutant interactions. Further investigation into volcanic or maritime contributions to SO2 variability in island environments may help clarify these patterns.
As model accuracy is crucial for interpreting the pollutant–NAO relationships, we next examine the residual patterns associated with each regression output. The residual analysis presented in
Figure 11 confirms the adequacy of the regression models for O
3 and NO
2, particularly in São Gonçalo. The residuals for these pollutants exhibit a random distribution and approximate normality, indicating that the models successfully captured the main patterns of variability driven by the NAO index. In Ribeira Grande, a slightly greater dispersion in residuals suggests a weaker signal-to-noise ratio, possibly due to lower emission density or greater influence of local meteorological fluctuations. In the case of SO
2, residuals were widely scattered and lacked a coherent structure at both sites, underscoring the limited explanatory power of synoptic-scale predictors for this compound. These diagnostic results support the robustness of the statistical associations reported for O
3 and NO
2 and reinforce the compound-specific nature of the observed NAO–pollutant relationships. To our knowledge, this is the first application of the RLM to investigate climate–pollution interactions in a mid-latitude island setting with minimal anthropogenic interference. Beyond the scientific relevance, the results of this study also carry practical implications for policy and health planning in island regions.
From a policy and planning perspective, these findings suggest that climate indices such as the NAO can enhance forecasting capabilities for ozone and NO
2 episodes in the Azores. The potential public health implications of ozone variability are well documented. From a public health perspective, the observed link between NAO phases and ozone concentrations has direct implications for population exposure in the Azores. Tropospheric ozone is a well-established respiratory and cardiovascular irritant, particularly harmful to vulnerable groups such as children, the elderly, and individuals with pre-existing conditions. As reviewed by [
21], tropospheric ozone is associated with increased respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity, particularly among sensitive populations. This relationship has also been observed locally in the Azores, where recent research on Faial Island identified significant associations between air quality variability and hospitalizations for respiratory diseases [
22]. Given the demonstrated link between NAO phases and ozone concentrations in this study, these findings highlight the importance of integrating large-scale climate patterns into health-oriented air quality policies. This is consistent with the view advocated for sustainable and integrated policy approaches that consider both climate variability and air quality, particularly in regions with limited infrastructure and exposure to multiple environmental stressors [
23]. This highlights the multidimensional vulnerability of the Azores to atmospheric dynamics, affecting both gaseous and particulate pollution [
24,
25]. Integrating synoptic-scale drivers into long-term air quality planning is essential, particularly for small island states and regions with limited observational coverage.
Together, these results underscore the importance of integrating large-scale climatic indices into both scientific assessment and regional environmental planning, a point further emphasized in the following conclusion.