Next Article in Journal
Performance Analysis of Refrigeration System with Thermal Energy Storage for Lateral Heat Sources
Previous Article in Journal
Wage Rates and Job Requirements Prediction: An Application to Logistics Online Job Postings Using Search Tools and Web Scraping
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

UV Irradiation’s Influence on Fumitory Extract-Loaded Liposomes †

by
Rabiea Ashowen Ahmoda
1,
Andrea Pirković
2,
Milena Milošević
3,
Aleksandar Marinković
1 and
Aleksandra Jovanović
2,*
1
Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade, Karnegijeva 4, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Institute for the Application of Nuclear Energy INEP, University of Belgrade, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia
3
Institute of Chemistry, Technology and Metallurgy, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Njegoševa 12, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the IX International Congress “Engineering, Environment and Materials in Process Industry”—EEM2025, Bijeljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2–4 April 2025.
Eng. Proc. 2025, 99(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025099016
Published: 17 June 2025

Abstract

:
The aim of the present study was the characterization of fumitory extract-loaded liposomal vesicles after UV irradiation via the determination of the encapsulation efficiency, size, polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential, mobility, and conductivity. The encapsulation efficiency was the same before and after UV irradiation (>69%). The particle size and PDI of the UV-irradiated liposomes with the fumitory extract were 294.2 ± 4.1 nm and 0.387 ± 0.011, respectively. The zeta potential after UV irradiation was −5.51 ± 0.4 mV. The mobility and conductivity of the obtained liposomal particles were −0.429 ± 0.012 µmcm/Vs and 0.468 ± 0.005 mS/cm, respectively. The results indicate the existence of nanoparticles and a non-uniform system, while a negative zeta potential value is related to the organization of phospholipids. Since UV irradiation did not cause significant changes in all of the mentioned parameters of the fumitory extract-loaded liposomes, it can be employed as a sterilization step in the preparation of liposomes.

1. Introduction

Fumaria officinalis L. (fumitory, Fumariaceae family) is a scrambling annual plant, distributed and cultivated throughout Europe, and represents smooth, slender, and branched stems of variable height (10–100 cm), with grey-green, feathery, and alternate leaves, lateral and terminal racemes of purplish pink, and a smoky appearance. The plant is a component of various phytotherapeutic formulations in European ethnobotany, used for hepatobiliary dysfunction, illnesses of the gastrointestinal and urogenital tracts, cancer, rheumatism, high blood pressure, and skin disorders [1,2]. The biological activities of the plant can be attributed to its high content of polyphenols and alkaloids. However, the application of the mentioned compounds is limited due to their poor water solubility, intestinal resorption, and low bioavailability. Liposomal vesicles, as non-toxic, biodegradable, and biocompatible carriers, can provide the controlled delivery of bioactive components, protection from degradation, and improved bioavailability. In addition, phospholipids from the liposomal membrane do not provoke a reaction with taste receptors, and, therefore, the liposomal bilayer is an appropriate carrier for obscuring the unpleasant taste of numerous polyphenols and alkaloids [3,4,5]. Moreover, liposomes can encapsulate lipophilic, hydrophilic, and amphiphilic compounds [6]. UV irradiation, as a sterilization method, is highly effective against a wide range of bacterial strains. Therefore, the aim of the present study was the characterization of fumitory extract-loaded liposomal vesicles after UV irradiation via the determination of the encapsulation efficiency (EE), size, polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential, mobility, and conductivity.

2. Materials and Methods

F. officinalis was from the Institute for Medicinal Plants Research “Dr Josif Pančić” (Serbia). The Simplicity UV® water purification system from Merck Millipore (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to prepare ultrapure water. Ethanol (used for extract preparation) was from Fisher Science (Leicestershire, UK), while soy phospholipids (used for liposome preparation) were from Lipoid (Ludwigshafen, Germany).
The extraction from the fumitory plant (grinded aerial part) was performed at room temperature in the incubator shaker KS 4000i control (IKA, Staufen, Germany) using 50% ethanol and a solvent-to-solid ratio of 30:1 mL/g for 60 min. The samples were filtered through filter paper.
Liposomes with fumitory extract were prepared using the proliposome method [7]. Ethanol fumitory extract (10 mL) and phospholipids (1 g) were stirred and heated to 60 °C for 15 min. After cooling, distilled water (20 mL) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at 800 rpm.
UV irradiation was performed in a laminar flow cabinet (AC2-4G8, ESCo, Singapore) for 20 min. Subsequently, measurements of EE, size, PDI, zeta potential, mobility, and conductivity were performed.
The free extract was removed from liposome dispersions by centrifugation at 17,500 rpm for 45 min at 4 °C in a Thermo Scientific Sorval WX Ultra series ultracentrifuge (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The amount of extract in the supernatant was determined spectrophotometrically (UV Spectrophotometer UV-1800, Shimadzu, Japan). EE was calculated as the content of fumitory extract polyphenols encapsulated in liposomal particles divided by the content of extract polyphenols used for the preparation of the liposome bilayer: EE (%) = (mi − ms)/mi × 100. Here, mi is the initial amount of polyphenols used for liposomal preparation, and ms is the amount of polyphenols determined in the supernatant.
The size, PDI, zeta potential, mobility, and conductivity of the UV-irradiated liposomes were determined by photon correlation spectroscopy in a Zetasizer Nano Series, Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK). Each sample was measured three times at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

In the present research, the influence of UV irradiation on the EE, size, PDI, zeta potential, mobility, and conductivity of the fumitory extract-loaded liposomes was investigated. The results are presented in Table 1. The EE did not change after UV irradiation and amounted to >69% (>73% for the non-treated parallel samples). The factors affecting the encapsulation efficiency in the liposomes are various, including the liposome composition, procedure, drug characteristics, solvent properties, pH, ionic strength, processing conditions, etc. [8,9]. The vesicle size and PDI of the UV-irradiated liposomes with the fumitory extract were 294.2 ± 4.1 nm and 0.387 ± 0.011, respectively. The size and PDI of the non-treated samples were 274.0 nm and 0.307 [8], respectively. The zeta potential after UV irradiation was low and amounted to −5.51 ± 0.40 mV. The mobility and conductivity of the UV-irradiated fumitory extract-loaded liposomes were −0.429 ± 0.012 µmcm/Vs and 0.468 ± 0.005 mS/cm, respectively. The zeta potential, mobility, and conductivity of the non-treated parallels were −6.34 ± 0.71 mV, −0.491 ± 0.011 µmcm/Vs, and 0.465 ± 0.009 mS/cm, respectively.
Since the liposomes contain only phospholipids (without sterols), the liposomal bilayer was more rigid [9], preventing the leakage of the encapsulated compounds, and thus improving the EE. The measured particle size value agrees with those reported in the literature, where phospholipid liposomes containing plant extracts can have diameters over 200 nm [10,11,12]. The obtained PDI value indicates the existence of a non-uniform system. A negative zeta potential value is related to the organization of phospholipids, whereas a low value suggests that the liposomal suspension is not electrostatically stabilized. The mobility of the liposomal particles represents a function of the size, total charge, and composition of the liposomal membrane. At the same time, the fluidity/rigidity and deformable properties of the liposomes also significantly impact their mobility [13]. In the case of the fumitory extract-loaded liposomes, a higher amount of the added extract resulted in a higher conductivity value. Namely, the measurement of conductivity values can be used for further simple assays of the concentrations of bioactives in release experiments [14]. Additionally, the enhancement in the conductivity of liposomal suspension can be associated with the leakage of the entrapped bioactives, and since the conductivity correlates with the concentration of the plant extract, the encapsulation efficiency can be indirectly examined without time-consuming and expensive analytical procedures [15].

4. Conclusions

In the present study, fumitory extract-loaded liposomes were developed, UV-irradiated, and characterized in terms of their encapsulation efficiency, size, PDI, zeta potential, mobility, and conductivity. The results indicate the existence of nanoparticles and a non-uniform system with very low values of zeta potential and mobility. The beneficial effects of bioactive principles from F. officinalis on human health highlight the application of liposomes as carriers for its extracts and their potential implementation in food, functional food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetic formulations. Since UV irradiation did not cause significant changes in the measured parameters of fumitory-loaded liposomes, it can be employed as a sterilization step in the preparation of liposomes. However, future studies should be directed toward the improvement of liposomal stability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.A.A. and A.J.; methodology, R.A.A., A.P. and A.J.; formal analysis, M.M. and A.J.; investigation, A.J.; resources, A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.A.A. and A.J.; writing—review and editing, A.P., M.M. and A.M.; supervision, A.M. and A.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation, Republic of Serbia, through a grant agreement with the University of Belgrade, Institute for the Application of Nuclear Energy—INEP: 451-03-136/2025-03/200019, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy: 451-03-136/2025-03/200135, and University of Belgrade, Institute of Chemistry, Technology and Metallurgy—National Institute of the Republic of Serbia: 451-03-136/2025-03/200026. This research aligns with Agenda 2030—United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3, promoting good health and well-being.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Adham, A.N.; Naqishbandi, A.M.; Efferth, T. Cytotoxicity and apoptosis induction by Fumaria officinalis extracts in leukemia and multiple myeloma cell lines. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 266, 113458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Khamtache-Abderrahim, S.; Lequart-Pillon, M.; Gontier, E.; Gaillard, I.; Pilard, S.; Mathiron, D.; Djoudad-Kadji, H.; Maiza-Benabdesselam, F. Isoquinoline alkaloid fractions of Fumaria officinalis: Characterization and evaluation of their antioxidant and antibacterial activities. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 94, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qiao, K.; Zhao, M.; Huang, Y.; Liang, L.; Zhang, Y. Bitter perception and effects of foods rich in bitter compounds on human health: A comprehensive review. Foods 2024, 13, 3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vummaneni, V.; Nagpal, D. Taste masking technologies: An overview and recent updates. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Biomed. Sci. 2012, 3, 510–524. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wan, B.; Xiao, Q.; Huang, M.; Ying, R. Masking the bitter taste of quercetin by liposomes modified with whey protein isolate: Better to be coated or inserted? Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 149, 109540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jovanović, A.A.; Ćujić, D.; Stojadinović, B.; Čutović, N.; Živković, J.; Šavikin, K. Liposomal bilayer as a carrier of Rosa canina L. seed oil: Physicochemical characterization, stability, and biological potential. Molecules 2022, 28, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Isailović, B.; Kostić, I.; Zvonar, A.; Đorđević, V.; Gašperlin, M.; Nedović, V.; Bugarski, B. Resveratrol loaded liposomes produced by different techniques. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2013, 19, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Colletier, J.P.; Chaize, B.; Winterhalter, M.; Fournier, D. Protein encapsulation in liposomes: Efficiency depends on interactions between protein and phospholipid bilayer. BMC Biotechnol. 2002, 2, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Jovanović, A.; Balanč, B.; Ota, A.; Ahlin Grabnar, P.; Djordjević, V.; Šavikin, K.; Bugarski, B.; Nedović, V.; Poklar-Ulrih, N. Comparative effects of cholesterol and β-sitosterol on the liposome membrane characteristics. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2018, 120, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Olatunde, O.O.; Benjakul, S.; Vongkamjan, K.; Amnuaikit, T. Influence of stabilising agents on the properties of liposomal encapsulated ethanolic coconut husk extract. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 702–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Patias, N.S.; Sinhorin, V.D.G.; Ferneda, A.J.L.B.; Ferneda, J.M.A.; Sugui, M.M.; Ferrarini, S.R.; Bomfim, G.F.; Lopes, J.W.; Antoniassi, N.A.B.; Cavalheiro, L.; et al. Study of liposomes containing extract from the leaves of Protium heptaphyllum (Aubl.) march in animals submitted to a mutagenic model induced by cyclophosphamide. Biology 2024, 13, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Akgün, D.; Gültekin-Özgüven, M.; Yücetepe, A.; Altin, G.; Gibis, M.; Weiss, J.; Özçelik, B. Stirred-type yoghurt incorporated with sour cherry extract in chitosan-coated liposomes. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 101, 105532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Duffy, C.; Gafoor, S.; Richards, D.; Admadzadeh, H.; O’Kennedy, R.; Arriaga, E.A. Determination of properties of individual liposomes by capillary electrophoresis with postcolumn laser-induced fluorescence detection. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 1855–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Musiał, W.; Caddeo, C.; Jankowska-Konsur, A.; Passiu, G.; Urbaniak, T.; Twarda, M.; Zalewski, A. Electrical conductivity as an informative factor of the properties of liposomal systems with naproxen sodium for transdermal application. Materials 2024, 17, 5666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pereira, T.M.; Bonatto, C.C.; Silva, L.P. Rapid and versatile biosensing of liposome encapsulation efficiency using electrical conductivity sensor. Biosensors 2023, 13, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Encapsulation efficiency, size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, mobility, and conductivity of the fumitory extract-loaded liposomes.
Table 1. Encapsulation efficiency, size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, mobility, and conductivity of the fumitory extract-loaded liposomes.
SampleEE (%)Size (nm)PDIZeta Potential (mV)Mobility (µmcm/Vs)Conductivity (mS/cm)
Non-treated liposomes73.1 ± 2.3 a *274.0 ± 10.5 a0.387 ± 0.041 a−6.34 ± 0.71 a−0.491 ± 0.011 a0.465 ± 0.009 a
UV-irradiated liposomes69.0 ± 1.8 a294.2 ± 9.1 a0.317 ± 0.036 a−5.51 ± 0.40 a−0.429 ± 0.012 a0.468 ± 0.005 a
* The same letter indicates the absence of differences that are considered statistically significant (analysis of variance, i.e., one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s post hoc test; p < 0.05, n = 3).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmoda, R.A.; Pirković, A.; Milošević, M.; Marinković, A.; Jovanović, A. UV Irradiation’s Influence on Fumitory Extract-Loaded Liposomes. Eng. Proc. 2025, 99, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025099016

AMA Style

Ahmoda RA, Pirković A, Milošević M, Marinković A, Jovanović A. UV Irradiation’s Influence on Fumitory Extract-Loaded Liposomes. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 99(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025099016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmoda, Rabiea Ashowen, Andrea Pirković, Milena Milošević, Aleksandar Marinković, and Aleksandra Jovanović. 2025. "UV Irradiation’s Influence on Fumitory Extract-Loaded Liposomes" Engineering Proceedings 99, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025099016

APA Style

Ahmoda, R. A., Pirković, A., Milošević, M., Marinković, A., & Jovanović, A. (2025). UV Irradiation’s Influence on Fumitory Extract-Loaded Liposomes. Engineering Proceedings, 99(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025099016

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop