In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to a peer-review process administered by the volume editors. The reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
- Type of peer review: Single-blind.
- Conference submission management system: through Google Forms.
- Total number of abstracts received: 784.
- Total number of abstracts shortlisted: 700.
- Number of submissions sent for review: 700.
- Number of submissions accepted: 360.
- Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 51%.
- Average number of reviews per paper: 2.
- Total number of reviewers involved: 245.
- Peer review criteria and process: Figure 1.
Figure 1. Peer-review criteria and process.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed equally to this paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
Data are available from the corresponding authors of the published manuscripts upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).