Next Article in Journal
Using Tan Delta and Dielectric Constant as Criterion for the Selection of Suitable Insulation Materials for HV Cable Joints
Previous Article in Journal
Unquestioned Use of AI-Based Facial Recognition Technology in Criminal Investigations: Delhi Riots Lessons on Rights and Reliability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Feasibility Assessment of Eco-Bricks: Integrating (Vivipara Angularis) Shell and Shredded Plastic Waste for Sustainable Civil and Construction Materials †

Department of Teacher Education, College of Industrial Technology and Teacher Education, Caraga State University Cabadbaran Campus, Cabadbaran City 8605, Philippines
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 8th International Global Conference Series on ICT Integration in Technical Education & Smart Society, Aizuwakamatsu City, Japan, 20–26 January 2026.
Eng. Proc. 2026, 143(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026143018
Published: 15 June 2026

Abstract

Concrete bricks have been used in construction for over a century, often used for foundations and retaining walls. Its production contributes significantly to carbon emissions and the depletion of natural resources. Thus, this study aims to develop an outdoor brick using crushed bivalve shell (Vivipara angularis), locally known as “Ige”, as an aggregate to reduce the need for natural aggregates, which are a finite resource, and molasses as an admixture to improve the brick’s workability and strength. A series of experiments was conducted to test the bricks’ fire resistance, water absorption, and compression, aiming to determine the feasibility of making bricks from crushed bivalve shells, shredded plastic bottles, cement, sand, water, and molasses. The project used an experimental and developmental research approach. The study was conducted at the Caraga State University, Cabadbaran Campus. Results showed that (a.) Sample 2, which contains 400 g of cement, 800 g of sand, and 1200 g of bivalve freshwater shell with the ratio of 1:2:3, has good fire resistance characteristics (b.) Sample 5, which contains more plastic bottles rather than freshwater shells, performed well in water absorption and (c.) Sample 2, a mixture of 400 g of cement, 800 g of sand, and 1200 g of bivalve freshwater shell with a ratio of 1:2:3, exhibits good comprehensive strength. The study revealed that using bivalve freshwater shells can improve the durability of concrete bricks and, when combined with plastic bottles, reduce water absorption; however, it can also compromise brick durability.
Keywords: concrete bricks; bivalve freshwater shell; plastic bottles; molasses concrete bricks; bivalve freshwater shell; plastic bottles; molasses

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Biongcog, J.J.; Pintoy, E.J.; Suizo, K.J.; Ruiz, J.D.; Lunio, I.J. Feasibility Assessment of Eco-Bricks: Integrating (Vivipara Angularis) Shell and Shredded Plastic Waste for Sustainable Civil and Construction Materials. Eng. Proc. 2026, 143, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026143018

AMA Style

Biongcog JJ, Pintoy EJ, Suizo KJ, Ruiz JD, Lunio IJ. Feasibility Assessment of Eco-Bricks: Integrating (Vivipara Angularis) Shell and Shredded Plastic Waste for Sustainable Civil and Construction Materials. Engineering Proceedings. 2026; 143(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026143018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Biongcog, Jona J., Edcel John Pintoy, Kurt Justine Suizo, June Diether Ruiz, and Ivy Jane Lunio. 2026. "Feasibility Assessment of Eco-Bricks: Integrating (Vivipara Angularis) Shell and Shredded Plastic Waste for Sustainable Civil and Construction Materials" Engineering Proceedings 143, no. 1: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026143018

APA Style

Biongcog, J. J., Pintoy, E. J., Suizo, K. J., Ruiz, J. D., & Lunio, I. J. (2026). Feasibility Assessment of Eco-Bricks: Integrating (Vivipara Angularis) Shell and Shredded Plastic Waste for Sustainable Civil and Construction Materials. Engineering Proceedings, 143(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026143018

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop