Next Article in Journal
You Only Look Once-Based Bitter Melon Size Classification Enhanced by Harris Corner Detection and Douglas–Peucker Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis and Testing of Night Image Positioning System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Metamodeling Approach for Comparison of Linear Flux-Switching and Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines for Electric Aircraft Propulsion †

by
Enrico Teichert
*,
Matthias Lang
,
Ilja Koch
and
Stefan Kazula
German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Electrified Aero Engines, Lieberoser Str. 13A, 03046 Cottbus, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 15th EASN International Conference, Madrid, Spain, 14–17 October 2025.
Eng. Proc. 2026, 133(1), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133049
Published: 17 April 2026

Abstract

The increasing demand for electric, direct-drive propulsion systems with high torque density and high efficiency is driving the development of novel topologies in aviation. Conventional surface-mounted permanent magnet machines offer high efficiency with medium gravimetric shear force density. Flux-switching machines have a significantly higher specific force density and offer attractive advantages such as structural robustness, favorable permanent magnet utilization and simplified cooling options. In this work, two FSM variants and an SPM benchmark are investigated. A metamodel-based optimization framework is employed to efficiently explore a parameterized design space, allowing the identification of pareto-optimal solutions. Selected designs are analyzed in detail and compared with each other. The results show that high-pole FSM configurations are particularly suitable for torque-dense electric machines in aviation due to their high shear force density and scalability.
Keywords: electromagnetic analysis; FSM; multi-objective optimization; sensitivity analysis; SPM electromagnetic analysis; FSM; multi-objective optimization; sensitivity analysis; SPM

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Teichert, E.; Lang, M.; Koch, I.; Kazula, S. Metamodeling Approach for Comparison of Linear Flux-Switching and Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines for Electric Aircraft Propulsion. Eng. Proc. 2026, 133, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133049

AMA Style

Teichert E, Lang M, Koch I, Kazula S. Metamodeling Approach for Comparison of Linear Flux-Switching and Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines for Electric Aircraft Propulsion. Engineering Proceedings. 2026; 133(1):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Teichert, Enrico, Matthias Lang, Ilja Koch, and Stefan Kazula. 2026. "Metamodeling Approach for Comparison of Linear Flux-Switching and Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines for Electric Aircraft Propulsion" Engineering Proceedings 133, no. 1: 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133049

APA Style

Teichert, E., Lang, M., Koch, I., & Kazula, S. (2026). Metamodeling Approach for Comparison of Linear Flux-Switching and Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines for Electric Aircraft Propulsion. Engineering Proceedings, 133(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133049

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop