Statement of Peer Review †
- Type of peer review: 2–3 reviews by double-blind;
- Conference submission management system: http://www.ecbios.asia/;
- Number of submissions received: 131;
- Number of submissions sent for review: 95;
- Number of submissions accepted: 32;
- Acceptance rate: 33.68%;
- Average number of reviews per paper: 2;
- Total number of reviewers involved: 50.
Conflicts of Interest

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Meen, T.-H.; Chen, C.-Y.; Yang, C.-F. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2026, 129, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026129034
Meen T-H, Chen C-Y, Yang C-F. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2026; 129(1):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026129034
Chicago/Turabian StyleMeen, Teen-Hang, Cheng-Yi Chen, and Cheng-Fu Yang. 2026. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 129, no. 1: 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026129034
APA StyleMeen, T.-H., Chen, C.-Y., & Yang, C.-F. (2026). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 129(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026129034

