Next Article in Journal
Trunk and Lower-Extremity Kinematics During Gait After Posterior Fixation for Thoracolumbar Fracture
Previous Article in Journal
Toward an Interpretable Multipath Error Model from GNSS Observables Through the Application of Deep Learning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Experimental Testbed and Measurement Campaign for Multi-Constellation LEO Positioning †

by
Marc Fernández-Temprado
1,*,
Antoni Reus-Bergas
1,
Gonzalo Seco-Granados
1,2 and
José A. López-Salcedo
1,2
1
Centre d’Estudis i Recerca en Espai (CERES), Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
2
Department of Telecommunication and Systems Engineering, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the European Navigation Conference 2025 (ENC 2025), Wrocław, Poland, 21–23 May 2025.
Eng. Proc. 2026, 126(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026126012
Published: 14 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of European Navigation Conference 2025)

Abstract

The proliferation of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellations, driven by the NewSpace economy and reduced launch costs, has opened new opportunities for positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) applications. Compared to traditional GNSS systems operating in Medium Earth Orbit, LEO satellites offer several advantages: higher received signal power, better satellite geometry and visibility in urban environments, and greater Doppler dynamics—enabling approaches such as single-satellite and Doppler-based positioning. Although dedicated LEO-PNT constellations are still under development, existing commercial LEO satellites can already be leveraged for experimental positioning applications. This paper presents a portable, multi-constellation testbed built using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware and software-defined radio (SDR) technologies. The platform enables the synchronous acquisition and processing of LEO signals from Orbcomm, Iridium, and Starlink, allowing for the extraction of key positioning observables. A comprehensive measurement campaign is conducted across both indoor and outdoor environments to evaluate signal visibility and Doppler tracking performance. Results highlight the potential of opportunistic LEO-based positioning, particularly in challenging scenarios such as indoor environments where traditional GNSS solutions are unreliable.

1. Introduction

Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) are widely used for positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT), but they face well-known limitations in signal-degraded environments such as urban canyons, indoors, or in the presence of jamming and spoofing. These challenges stem from the weak signal power and medium Earth orbit (MEO) geometry of GNSS satellites.
Low Earth Orbit (LEO) constellations offer several inherent advantages for PNT: significantly stronger received signal power due to closer proximity, improved geometry and visibility due to higher satellite density, and rapid orbital motion resulting in large Doppler dynamics. These features make LEO satellites especially attractive for Doppler-based navigation and resilient PNT applications.
Recent work in navigation using Signals of Opportunity (SoP) has shown that existing LEO constellations—originally designed for communications—can be opportunistically leveraged for positioning. Doppler-based positioning using Orbcomm and Iridium signals has been demonstrated for aiding inertial navigation or enabling standalone PNT in GNSS-denied environments [1,2]. Starlink signals have also been used to track pilot tones and carrier phases with high precision [3,4,5]. Multi-constellation fusion approaches have improved robustness and accuracy, although integration is limited by varying signal characteristics and orbital behaviors [6,7,8].
Despite these advances, many existing testbeds focus on single-constellation experiments or lack synchronization between receivers. Indoor applicability—critical for emerging LEO-based positioning use cases—remains largely unexplored. A notable exception is [9], which used COTS SDRs for multi-constellation acquisition but without receiver synchronization and it was limited to outdoor tests.
To address these gaps, this work introduces a portable, SDR-based testbed for synchronized multi-constellation LEO signal acquisition and analysis using COTS components. Its performance is validated through outdoor and indoor campaigns, confirming its viability for real-world opportunistic navigation.

2. Multi-Constellation LEO Testbed Design

This section presents the multi-constellation LEO testbed, detailing its system architecture, signal acquisition, and software processing pipeline. First, the hardware components and synchronization mechanisms of the system are introduced. Then, the signal acquisition process is described, including the relevant parameters for each constellation and the challenges associated with simultaneous multi-band reception. Finally, the digital signal processing techniques employed to extract positioning observables are discussed.

2.1. System Architecture

The proposed testbed facilitates synchronous reception and analysis of signals from multiple LEO constellations—Orbcomm, Iridium, and Starlink—using a modular hardware design. A high-level block diagram of the system is shown in Figure 1. Each constellation employs a dedicated receiving chain optimized for its specific signal parameters (e.g., frequency bands, modulation schemes). All chains are synchronized via a common clock and controlled through a centralized software framework to ensure temporal alignment and coherent data fusion.

2.1.1. Constellation Specific Reception Chains

Each constellation is received using a dedicated chain tailored to its frequency and polarization characteristics, while all signals are digitized using bladeRF 2.0 micro xA4 SDRs (Nuand, San Francisco, CA, USA).
For Orbcomm (137–138 MHz), a quadrifilar helix antenna (UC-1374-531R; Antennas.us, Margate, FL, USA [10]) matched to RHCP is used in combination with a Nooelec SAWbird+ NOAA LNA (Nooelec, Wheatfield, NY, USA [11]), which includes a SAW filter to suppress FM broadcast interference. In budget-constrained setups, a dipole antenna arranged in a V-configuration also provides sufficient reception due to Orbcomm’s strong signal power.
Iridium NEXT signals (1620–1626.5 MHz) are captured using a compact RHCP helical antenna (M1621HCT-EXT; Maxtena, Rockville, MD, USA [12]), offering a balance between gain (1 dBic) and portability for field deployment. The polarization match ensures reliable reception of Iridium’s short-burst transmissions.
For Starlink, Ku-band downlink beacons are downconverted to L-band using a high-gain MegaSat 0400072 LNB (Megasat Werke GmbH, Niederlauer, Germany [13]), powered by a 12 V bias-tee. A 75 Ω to 50 Ω adapter is used to interface with the SDR. Though originally intended for TV applications, this LNB provides sufficient bandwidth and gain (70 dB) for capturing Starlink pilot tones for Doppler tracking.

2.1.2. System Synchronization Mechanism

All bladeRF 2.0 micro xA4 SDRs share a 10 MHz oven-controlled crystal oscillator (OCXO) reference via U.FL connector. To ensure tight clock synchronization between the SDRs, inter-device coordination is established through J51 test point connections [14], enabling low-level communication. The Orbcomm SDR acts as the master, with the others configured as slaves to ensure coherent acquisition.
A prototype implementation of the synchronized multi-SDR platform is shown in Figure 2.

2.2. Signal Acquisition

The signal acquisition strategy must consider the unique characteristics and challenges of each LEO constellation—Orbcomm, Iridium, and Starlink—including variations in signal strength, bandwidth, transmission periodicity, and susceptibility to attenuation. These differences directly impact the design and coordination of a multi-constellation SDR-based testbed.

2.2.1. Orbcomm Signal Characteristics and Challenges

Orbcomm is a global provider of industrial IoT and M2M services, primarily supporting low-data-rate applications across the logistics, maritime, and energy sector. A summary of relevant signal characteristics is provided in Table 1.
Despite a larger number of satellites in orbit, only a subset (approximately 10) is consistently observed transmitting. This reduces the density of usable downlink signals at any given time. Passes occur approximately every 15 min, introducing temporal sparsity into acquisition windows.
Another critical challenge is interference from nearby FM broadcast signals (88–108 MHz), which can leak into the Orbcomm band. In urban environments or near powerful radio towers, this interference can significantly degrade signal quality. To mitigate this, an LNA with integrated filtering was selected to suppress out-of-band interference. Alternatively, an external FM notch filter is recommended when using COTS SDRs with limited front-end selectivity.

2.2.2. Iridium Signal Characteristics and Challenges

The Iridium constellation provides global voice, data, and messaging services using L-band frequencies. It operates in two bands: the duplex band (1616–1626 MHz) for uplink and downlink, and the simplex band (1626–1626.5 MHz) for downlink-only communication. This work focuses on signals in the simplex band. Table 2 summarizes the key parameters relevant to acquisition.
Iridium bursts consist of three segments: an unmodulated tone, a BPSK-modulated unique word, and QPSK-modulated data. While the received signal strength is generally high—making acquisition easier—these bursts occur sporadically and are not transmitted continuously throughout a satellite pass. This non-continuous nature makes Iridium less predictable for short observation periods, and calls for timing-aware acquisition strategies to capture these intermittent bursts.

2.2.3. Starlink Signal Characteristics and Challenges

Starlink, developed by SpaceX, delivers high-speed broadband via a large LEO constellation. Downlink signals (10.7–12.7 GHz) are organized into eight 240 MHz wide channels spaced 250 MHz apart. Each channel uses OFDM. Within each OFDM frame a subset of subcarriers is dedicated to transmitting data-less pilot signals, also known as leakage tones in [15].
In this work, the term beacons will refer specifically to these data-less pilot tones, to avoid confusion with the broader OFDM frame structure described also as beacons in [5]. These pilot beacons are typically located at the center of each user downlink channel and within the guard bands separating adjacent channels.
Table 3 provides an overview of relevant parameters for acquisition.
Starlink beacons exhibit distinct characteristics: intra-channel tones are strong/isolated, while inter-channel tones form persistent clusters. All tones remain sporadic and OFDM-synchronized, with transmission activity governed by dynamic traffic patterns and beam steering variability across satellites, locations, and time [16]. The proprietary waveform’s ongoing evolution—including 2023 power modifications—directly impacts detectability [5]. These factors, coupled with transient signal availability, create substantial acquisition and tracking challenges.

2.3. Software Processing

The software-defined receiver extracts three key observables critical for LEO-based positioning:
  • Carrier Phase and Doppler Frequency, which enable relative velocity estimation and are fundamental for Doppler-based navigation.
  • Symbol-Level Time Delay, required for synchronization and reliable demodulation.
  • Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), which provides a measure of signal quality and reliability for the above estimations.
The receiver architecture, shown in Figure 3, is adapted to each constellation’s signal characteristics and consists of three main processing stages:
  • Signal Conditioning performs baseband preprocessing, including constellation-specific tasks such as burst detection for Iridium and beacon detection for Starlink.
  • Acquisition carries out coarse Doppler estimation and carrier correction for all constellations, along with initial symbol timing estimation for Orbcomm and Iridium.
  • Tracking refines Doppler and phase estimates using a PLL. For Orbcomm and Iridium, a symbol-level loop (SLL) further improves timing synchronization—particularly under low SNR conditions.

3. Measurement Campaign

To validate the complete multi-constellation receiver, a measurement campaign was conducted to extract key observables from live satellite signals in both outdoor and indoor environments.

3.1. Experimental Setup

The campaign was conducted at two locations: a semi-urban outdoor site with open-sky visibility, and an indoor site with partial visibility through a large window. Conditions were mild and consistent. Each session lasted 5 min. Satellites tracked include Orbcomm FM118, Iridium 166, and Starlink-32431 (outdoor); and Orbcomm FM112 and Iridium 129 (indoor). No Starlink signals were detected indoors due to higher Ku-band attenuation.

3.2. Data Collection

Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the recorded spectra in outdoor and indoor scenarios respectively. Outdoors, Orbcomm signals were 10–20 dB above the noise floor, while Iridium reached 20 dB. Indoors, signal levels dropped significantly, with Orbcomm near 5 dB above noise and Iridium at 10 dB. Starlink beacons, when detectable, barely exceeded 5 dB above noise, highlighting their vulnerability to propagation losses and limited transmission power.

3.3. Results and Analysis

To assess the accuracy of the derived observables, the extracted parameters were compared against predictions obtained from Two-Line Element (TLE) ephemerids.

3.3.1. Outdoor Performance

Figure 6 presents the Doppler shift estimates obtained from live signal tracking of Orbcomm, Iridium, and Starlink satellites during the outdoor measurement campaign, alongside theoretical Doppler curves derived from TLE-based orbital predictions.
For Orbcomm, the estimated Doppler closely follows the theoretical curve, with a brief deviation between 30 to 50 s attributed to SNR drops below 5 dB—likely causing a temporary loss of phase lock. A small frequency offset is also observed, likely due to reference clock inaccuracies in the SDR.
For Iridium, the Doppler trace is discontinuous due to its TDMA burst transmission. Despite this, the estimates align well with expected trends. A similar frequency offset is observed, and Doppler tracking degrades noticeably when SNR falls below 7 dB.
For Starlink, Doppler tracking was successful for satellite STARLINK-32431, identified via the Doppler slope. A frequency offset is present due to the unknown center frequency of the pilot beacons. SNR values appear artificially elevated due to narrowband filtering during processing, which introduces sample correlation and biases the estimation. As a result, SNR peaks should be interpreted qualitatively.

3.3.2. Indoor Performance

Figure 7 shows the Doppler shift estimates for Orbcomm and Iridium under indoor conditions, compared to theoretical predictions. Due to their lower operating frequencies—VHF for Orbcomm and L-band for Iridium—both constellations demonstrate better signal penetration, enabling indoor tracking.
For Orbcomm, a brief deviation from the Doppler curve is observed, likely caused by attenuation from building materials, although the SNR remains stable since the disturbance only affects the carrier tracking loop and not the overall signal-to-noise ratio. The receiver quickly regains lock and maintains overall tracking.
Iridium performance degrades more noticeably. Fewer bursts are detected, and Doppler errors increase due to reduced SNR, which hampers burst detection and tracking stability indoors.

4. Conclusions

This work presented a portable, SDR-based testbed for synchronized acquisition and analysis of LEO satellite signals from Orbcomm, Iridium, and Starlink, using only commercial off-the-shelf components. Spanning over 10 GHz of the spectrum, the system supports multi-constellation reception with strong resilience to interference and jamming.
Validated through indoor and outdoor measurements, the testbed demonstrated reliable extraction of Doppler, delay, and SNR observables, with Doppler estimates closely matching theoretical predictions. It maintained tracking even under low SNR conditions, confirming its robustness—particularly for Orbcomm and Iridium, whose signals were trackable indoors. Starlink signals, while usable outdoors, remain limited indoors due to low beacon power and high-frequency attenuation.
Future work includes extending support to additional constellations, integrating adaptive tracking algorithms, and exploring real-time Doppler-based positioning. Overall, the proposed testbed provides a scalable platform for advancing resilient, opportunistic LEO-based navigation research.

Author Contributions

Testbed design, hardware validation and investigation, M.F.-T.; software, validation, analysis, A.R.-B. and J.A.L.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.F.-T.; writing—review and editing, M.F.-T., A.R.-B. and J.A.L.-S.; supervision, G.S.-G. and J.A.L.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has received funding from the Government of Catalonia within the framework of the New Space Strategy of Catalonia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Morales, J.J.; Khalife, J.; Abdallah, A.A.; Ardito, C.T.; Kassas, Z.M. Inertial navigation system aiding with Orbcomm LEO satellite Doppler measurements. In Proceedings of the 31st International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2018), Miami, FL, USA, 24–28 September 2018; pp. 2718–2725. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tan, Z.; Qin, H.; Cong, L.; Zhao, C. New Method for Positioning Using IRIDIUM Satellite Signals of Opportunity. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 83412–83423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khalife, J.; Neinavaie, M.; Kassas, Z.M. The first carrier phase tracking and positioning results with Starlink LEO satellite signals. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2021, 58, 1487–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jardak, N.; Adam, R. Practical use of Starlink downlink tones for positioning. Sensors 2023, 23, 3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kozhaya, S.; Saroufim, J.; Kassas, Z.Z.M. Unveiling Starlink for PNT. Navig. J. Inst. Navig. 2025, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Orabi, M.; Khalife, J.; Kassas, Z.M. Opportunistic Navigation with Doppler Measurements from Iridium Next and Orbcomm LEO Satellites. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Aerospace Conference (50100), Big Sky, MT, USA, 6–13 March 2021; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, C.; Qin, H.; Li, Z. Doppler measurements from multiconstellations in opportunistic navigation. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2022, 71, 8500709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jardak, N.; Adam, R.; Jault, Q. Leveraging Multi-LEO Satellite Signals for Opportunistic Positioning. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 127100–127114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Farhangian, F.; Landry, R., Jr. Multi-constellation software-defined receiver for Doppler positioning with LEO satellites. Sensors 2020, 20, 5866. [Google Scholar]
  10. UC-1374-531R, +4 dBic Orbcomm Antenna. Available online: https://www.antennas.us/uc-1374-531-4dBic-Orbcomm-Antenna.html (accessed on 14 April 2025).
  11. Nooelec. SAWbird+. Available online: https://www.nooelec.com/store/sdr/sdr-addons/sawbird/sawbird-plus-noaa-308.html (accessed on 16 March 2025).
  12. Iridium. Maxtena-M1621HCT-EXT Antenna. Available online: https://www.iridium.com/products/maxtena-m1621hct-ext/ (accessed on 14 April 2025).
  13. Megasat. High Gain Single LNB. Available online: https://www.megasat.tv/en/produkt/high-gain-single-lnb/ (accessed on 14 April 2025).
  14. Terris-Gallego, R.; Fernandez-Hernandez, I.; López-Salcedo, J.A.; Seco-Granados, G. E1-E6 SDR Platform Based on BladeRF for Testing Galileo-Assisted Commercial Authentication Service. Eng. Proc. 2023, 54, 29. [Google Scholar]
  15. Humphreys, T.E.; Iannucci, P.A.; Komodromos, Z.M.; Graff, A.M. Signal structure of the Starlink Ku-band downlink. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2023, 59, 6016–6030. [Google Scholar]
  16. Blázquez-García, R.; Cristallini, D.; Seidel, V.; Heckenbach, J.; Slavov, A.; O’Hagan, D. Experimental acquisition of Starlink satellite transmissions for passive radar applications. In Proceedings of the IET Conference Proceedings CP804, Edinburgh, UK, 24–27 October 2022; IET: Stevenage, UK, 2022; Volume 2022, pp. 130–135. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Multi-constellation LEO testbed diagram. The green, yellow, and blue boxes represent the dedicated RF chains for Orbcomm, Iridium NEXT, and Starlink, respectively. Black solid lines indicate RF and data signal paths, while yellow solid lines represent the 10 MHz reference clock distribution from the OCXO. Red dotted lines denote the inter-device synchronization via J51 connectors.
Figure 1. Multi-constellation LEO testbed diagram. The green, yellow, and blue boxes represent the dedicated RF chains for Orbcomm, Iridium NEXT, and Starlink, respectively. Black solid lines indicate RF and data signal paths, while yellow solid lines represent the 10 MHz reference clock distribution from the OCXO. Red dotted lines denote the inter-device synchronization via J51 connectors.
Engproc 126 00012 g001
Figure 2. Prototype of the multi-constellation LEO testbed.
Figure 2. Prototype of the multi-constellation LEO testbed.
Engproc 126 00012 g002
Figure 3. High-level architecture of the software-defined receiver. The processing chain is divided into three main blocks: (i) signal conditioning (orange) tailored to each constellation, (ii) acquisition (blue) for coarse Doppler and timing synchronization, and (iii) tracking (green) for fine carrier and symbol-level synchronization. The final output includes Doppler, timing, and SNR observables used for positioning.
Figure 3. High-level architecture of the software-defined receiver. The processing chain is divided into three main blocks: (i) signal conditioning (orange) tailored to each constellation, (ii) acquisition (blue) for coarse Doppler and timing synchronization, and (iii) tracking (green) for fine carrier and symbol-level synchronization. The final output includes Doppler, timing, and SNR observables used for positioning.
Engproc 126 00012 g003
Figure 4. Outdoor signal spectra for the measurement campaign: (a) Orbcomm FM118 downlink signal, where the red dots indicate the two active downlink channels; (b) Iridium-NEXT 166 downlink signal; and (c) Starlink-32431 downlink beacons. Note: the central peak in (c) at 10.950 GHz is caused by the LNB’s DC offset and does not correspond to an actual Starlink beacon.
Figure 4. Outdoor signal spectra for the measurement campaign: (a) Orbcomm FM118 downlink signal, where the red dots indicate the two active downlink channels; (b) Iridium-NEXT 166 downlink signal; and (c) Starlink-32431 downlink beacons. Note: the central peak in (c) at 10.950 GHz is caused by the LNB’s DC offset and does not correspond to an actual Starlink beacon.
Engproc 126 00012 g004
Figure 5. Indoor signal spectra for the measurement campaign: (a) Orbcomm FM112 downlink signal, where the red dots indicate the active downlink channels; and (b) Iridium-NEXT 129 downlink signal.
Figure 5. Indoor signal spectra for the measurement campaign: (a) Orbcomm FM112 downlink signal, where the red dots indicate the active downlink channels; and (b) Iridium-NEXT 129 downlink signal.
Engproc 126 00012 g005
Figure 6. Comparison of Doppler shift estimates from the outdoor measurement campaign with theoretical predictions derived from TLE ephemerides. (a) Orbcomm FM118 Doppler shift. (b) Iridium-NEXT 166 Doppler shift. (c) Starlink-32431 beacon Doppler shift.
Figure 6. Comparison of Doppler shift estimates from the outdoor measurement campaign with theoretical predictions derived from TLE ephemerides. (a) Orbcomm FM118 Doppler shift. (b) Iridium-NEXT 166 Doppler shift. (c) Starlink-32431 beacon Doppler shift.
Engproc 126 00012 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of extracted indoor Doppler observables with theoretical predictions from TLE ephemerids. (a) Indoor Orbcomm FM112 Doppler shift. (b) Indoor Iridium-NEXT 129 Doppler shift.
Figure 7. Comparison of extracted indoor Doppler observables with theoretical predictions from TLE ephemerids. (a) Indoor Orbcomm FM112 Doppler shift. (b) Indoor Iridium-NEXT 129 Doppler shift.
Engproc 126 00012 g007
Table 1. Parameters of the Orbcomm constellation.
Table 1. Parameters of the Orbcomm constellation.
ParameterValue/Description
Number of satellites10 (active)
Downlink frequencies137.175–137.8125 MHz
Bandwidth (kHz)25
Multiple accessFDMA
Maximum Doppler±3 kHz
Transmission modeContinuous
PolarizationRHCP
ModulationSDPSK (Symmetrical Differential Phase Shift Keying),
(±90-degree phase shift)
Pulse shapingSquared root raised cosine (40% roll-off)
Symbol rate4800 Baud
Table 2. Parameters of the Iridium constellation.
Table 2. Parameters of the Iridium constellation.
ParameterValue/Description
Number of satellites66 (+9 spare)
Downlink frequencies1626–1626.5 MHz
Bandwidth (kHz)41.667
Multiple accessFDMA + TDMA
Maximum Doppler±31.5 kHz
Transmission modeBursts
PolarizationRHCP
ModulationQPSK
Pulse shapingSquared root raised cosine (40% roll-off)
Symbol rate25,000 Baud
Table 3. Parameters of the Starlink constellation.
Table 3. Parameters of the Starlink constellation.
ParameterValue/Description
Number of active satellites>7000
Downlink frequency range10.7–12.7 GHz
Beacon tone frequencies f i = 10.7 + ( i 1 ) · 0.125  GHz, for i = 1 , 2 , , 17
Maximum Doppler shift±230 kHz
Transmission modeSporadic (dependent on satellite activity and traffic demand)
Modulation schemeOFDM
PolarizationCircular (RHCP or LHCP, depending on beam configuration)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernández-Temprado, M.; Reus-Bergas, A.; Seco-Granados, G.; López-Salcedo, J.A. Experimental Testbed and Measurement Campaign for Multi-Constellation LEO Positioning. Eng. Proc. 2026, 126, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026126012

AMA Style

Fernández-Temprado M, Reus-Bergas A, Seco-Granados G, López-Salcedo JA. Experimental Testbed and Measurement Campaign for Multi-Constellation LEO Positioning. Engineering Proceedings. 2026; 126(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026126012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernández-Temprado, Marc, Antoni Reus-Bergas, Gonzalo Seco-Granados, and José A. López-Salcedo. 2026. "Experimental Testbed and Measurement Campaign for Multi-Constellation LEO Positioning" Engineering Proceedings 126, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026126012

APA Style

Fernández-Temprado, M., Reus-Bergas, A., Seco-Granados, G., & López-Salcedo, J. A. (2026). Experimental Testbed and Measurement Campaign for Multi-Constellation LEO Positioning. Engineering Proceedings, 126(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026126012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop