Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Action Recognition Techniques: Exploring Two-Stream CNNs, C3D, LSTM, I3D, Attention Mechanisms, and Hybrid Models
Previous Article in Journal
Simulated Attacks and Defenses Using Traffic Sign Recognition Machine Learning Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

A Prototype of Integrated Remote Patient Monitoring System †

1
Nex Gen Ltd., 82 Dimitar Dimov Str. (Côte d’Azur), 8000 Burgas, Bulgaria
2
Department of Computer Science, Varna Free University “Chernorizets Hrabar”, 9007 Varna, Bulgaria
3
Department of Communication and Computer Engineering, South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, 66 Ivan Mihaylov Str., 2700 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the International Conference on Electronics, Engineering Physics and Earth Science (EEPES 2025), Alexandroupolis, Greece, 18–20 June 2025.
Eng. Proc. 2025, 104(1), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025104068
Published: 29 August 2025

Abstract

The ongoing global shortage of healthcare personnel, exacerbated by demographic changes and the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, has highlighted the need for efficient workforce utilization and innovative technological support in healthcare. This paper presents LifeLink Monitoring, a prototype of an integrated remote patient monitoring system designed to optimize clinical workflows, support medical personnel, and enhance patient care without replacing human expertise. The system enables real-time patient observation through AI-powered devices, providing automated alerts, live video feeds, and intelligent task management to reduce the burden of non-clinical duties on healthcare professionals. Applications include hospitals, hospices, home care, and remote locations. Key features include seamless integration with medical devices and national health records, advanced computer vision and audio analysis, multi-level deployment models, and a blockchain-secured architecture ensuring high data privacy and cybersecurity standards. Additionally, LifeLink incorporates an entertainment module aimed at improving patient emotional well-being. The solution represents a convergence of artificial and human intelligence to improve healthcare delivery, personnel efficiency, and patient outcomes.

1. Introduction

The healthcare sector is currently facing an unprecedented shortage of medical personnel across the globe. Contributing factors include population growth, aging societies, the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, and the substantial impact of global crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic [1,2,3]. Countries such as Australia, the United States, and many within the European Union have reported significant gaps in their healthcare workforce, especially among nurses and specialized physicians [4]. Bulgaria, for instance, faces a shortfall of approximately 4000 doctors and 30,000 nurses, with an aging medical workforce and limited recruitment [5].
Digital transformation of the health sector is needed to radically change how healthcare services are provided [6,7].
The integration of the Internet of Things (IoT) into healthcare systems has transformed the landscape of Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM), facilitating continuous, real-time collection and transmission of physiological data such as heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation [8]. IoT-enabled medical devices enhance clinical decision-making by allowing healthcare providers to monitor patients remotely, thereby improving accessibility, reducing hospital readmissions, and promoting early intervention strategies [9]. Recent research highlights the synergy between IoT and artificial intelligence (AI), where predictive analytics are used to detect anomalies and forecast adverse health events in real-time, significantly advancing proactive care models [10]. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has acted as a catalyst in accelerating the adoption of IoT-based RPM systems, underlining their capacity to manage chronic conditions efficiently while minimizing the need for physical consultations [11]. The scalability, interoperability, and real-time responsiveness of IoT platforms continue to establish them as a cornerstone technology in the development of sustainable and patient-centric remote healthcare systems [12].
In response to these challenges, digital solutions such as RPM systems have emerged to augment healthcare service delivery. For example, Tan et al. [13] conducted a systematic review showing that RPM interventions improved adherence, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness, especially for chronic disease management. Similarly, Agali et al. [14] explored the stages of patient engagement and how the evolution of remote monitoring systems can redefine patient engagement and provide more accurate information to reflect the multifaceted interactions between patients and technology.
However, most existing RPM systems focus primarily on physiological data transmission and monitoring, often lacking the capacity for real-time video analysis and AI-assisted alert systems [15,16], or are designed exclusively for elderly care [17,18]. For example, Chandak et al. [15] proposed a tiered architecture for RPM focused on scalable service layers but without integrating live video analytics or emotion-sensitive AI detection. Similarly, Efendi et al. [18] present a modular health analytics system relying on AI for diagnosis, yet lacking a blockchain-secured data infrastructure or entertainment modules. These gaps underscore the need for more comprehensive and secure patient-centric systems, as proposed by LifeLink.
This paper introduces the prototype of a LifeLink Monitoring, a comprehensive, AI-driven RPM system that builds on and extends beyond existing solutions. Unlike traditional RPM systems, LifeLink integrates computer vision, real-time video streaming, audio analysis, and blockchain-based data integrity, offering a more interactive, proactive, and secure patient-caregiver interface. This system is designed to automate routine tasks, optimize medical workflows, enhance emotional and physical monitoring, and support healthcare professionals in delivering effective, secure, and patient-centered care. The purpose of the remote patient monitoring system is not to replace medical personnel but rather to serve as an indispensable assistant. This system allows healthcare professionals to focus on tasks that require their expertise while handling routine, non-medical, and often tedious tasks that currently consume their time.

2. Materials and Methods

The LifeLink Monitoring device is placed near the patient who requires monitoring. It is configured in the system along with the necessary patient information and linked to relevant monitoring units, initiating continuous patient observation. If an incident occurs requiring the intervention of on-site specialists, the monitoring units send an alert to the mobile devices of the responsible healthcare professionals associated with the patient—orderlies, nurses, doctors, or emergency contacts—depending on the severity of the situation or the instructions given to the monitoring agents. One or more healthcare professionals accept the alert and can review the live video stream from the device to assess the situation in real-time and prepare accordingly. Upon resolving the alert, a QR code on the device is scanned, quickly marking the case as addressed and making the specialist available again for future alerts.
LifeLink Monitoring integrates advanced hardware and software components to facilitate real-time, continuous patient observation in diverse care environments. The system comprises a monitoring device configured with patient-specific data and connected to a centralized network. In case of a clinical incident, the system issues automated alerts to the mobile devices of relevant healthcare staff. Accepted alerts provide live video feeds and alert descriptions, enabling professionals to assess and prepare for intervention. Post-resolution, scanning a QR code on the device logs the case closure.
The system is further enhanced by AI and computer vision modules that analyze facial expressions, body posture, and audio cues to detect medical distress, unusual behaviors, or potential emergencies [8,19]. AI excels at identifying patterns, handling routine tasks, and processing large volumes of data, while human professionals bring decision-making skills, creativity, and contextual understanding. AI excels at identifying patterns, handling routine tasks, and processing large volumes of data, while human professionals bring decision-making skills, creativity, and contextual understanding. The system is designed to complement both artificial and natural intelligence, leveraging the strengths of each. It interfaces with medical devices (e.g., heart rate monitors, oxygen sensors, ECGs) and is compatible with hospital information systems and national health records.
Handling sensitive information, LifeLink Monitoring places the utmost importance on data security and system integrity. The platform is designed with a robust security architecture that incorporates industry-leading best practices to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of patient data.
To ensure secure data handling, LifeLink employs end-to-end encryption (E2EE), zero-trust architecture, and blockchain technology for immutable audit trails and data protection. E2EE ensures that all communications and stored records are encrypted, making them accessible only to authorized users. This encryption is applied both in transit and at rest, mitigating the risks of data breaches and unauthorized access. Multiple deployment models (dedicated, tenant-based, cloud) accommodate various institutional needs [20].
The system is also isolated from external environments, reducing its exposure to cyber threats and minimizing attack vectors. By implementing zero-trust security principles, access to critical information is restricted based on strict authentication and authorization protocols, preventing unauthorized users from gaining access.
Figure 1 illustrates the main components and data flow of the LifeLink Monitoring system, including patient-side devices, AI processing, cloud infrastructure, and interfaces for clinicians and caregivers. It emphasizes the flow between entities while including human figures to contextualize interactions. Color-coded connections indicate distinct data pathways: green lines represent physiological sensor input, red lines denote AI-generated alert signals, blue indicates video/audio feed transmission, and orange lines reflect blockchain-recorded audit logs.
The pipeline in Figure 2 demonstrates the flow of data from the video/audio input stage through AI-driven processes, including preprocessing, feature extraction, and pattern recognition, resulting in real-time clinical alert generation.
A key component of LifeLink Monitoring’s security framework is blockchain technology integration (Figure 3). By leveraging a decentralized and immutable ledger, the system ensures that recorded data cannot be altered retroactively. This significantly enhances data integrity, providing a verifiable audit trail for all interactions within the system.
The distributed nature of the stored data means that any potential data leak would be fragmented and rendered meaningless without access to the complete dataset, ensuring that even in the case of partial breaches, the exposed information cannot be reconstructed or misused.
To cater to different deployment needs, LifeLink Monitoring offers multiple deployment models, allowing healthcare institutions to choose the most suitable infrastructure for their operations:
  • Dedicated Model: The system is deployed on-premises within the healthcare facility’s own infrastructure, ensuring complete control over data and security policies.
  • Tenant-Based Model: The system is hosted on LifeLinkMonitoring’s managed infrastructure, offering a balance between security and ease of management.
  • Cloud-Based Model: The system operates in a secure cloud environment, enabling scalability, remote accessibility, and seamless integration with other cloud-based healthcare solutions.
With a multi-layered security approach, continuous monitoring, and compliance with international healthcare data protection regulations, LifeLink Monitoring provides a highly secure and resilient ecosystem for patient monitoring and healthcare data management.

Advantages of LifeLink Monitoring

  • Real-time video streaming allows direct visual access to the patient environment, enhancing clinical assessment.
  • AI-powered computer vision and audio analysis enable early detection of critical events such as falls, distress, or abnormal behavior.
  • Blockchain-based data integrity provides tamper-proof medical records, improving accountability and auditability.
  • QR-code alert resolution offers quick and traceable closure of clinical events.
  • Multi-protocol device integration ensures compatibility with standard hospital systems and wearable health devices.
  • End-to-end encryption and zero-trust architecture safeguard patient data at all stages.
  • The entertainment module supports mental health and emotional well-being, especially in pediatric and long-term care.
  • Modular deployment options (on-premises, tenant-hosted, or cloud-based) provide scalability and customization for diverse healthcare infrastructures.
  • Optimization: LifeLink Monitoring aims to separate non-medical tasks from the daily workload of medical personnel, allowing them to focus on and optimize their medical activities.
  • Documentation: All communications and alerts within the system are recorded and stored. This enables audits and helps identify operational weaknesses when necessary.
  • Analysis & Optimization: The accumulated system data and built-in analytical algorithms allow for the optimization of personnel workflow, identification of problematic areas, and informed decision-making in hospital operations.
A structured comparison of the advantages identified in this study against those associated with traditional RPM are provided in Table 1.

3. Results and Discussion

Preliminary implementation of the prototype LifeLink Monitoring in simulated healthcare environments indicates substantial benefits in optimizing staff workflows, reducing response times, and improving situational awareness. The system’s AI components reliably identify critical health events, while automation of non-clinical tasks allows medical staff to focus on specialized care. Recorded communications and alert logs enhance accountability and support clinical audits. Integration with hospital systems facilitates holistic patient management, enabling personalized treatment approaches.
At the current stage, the Prototype LifeLink Monitoring system has been tested in controlled simulated environments. Functionalities evaluated include: continuous video streaming, real-time alert generation, QR code-based incident resolution, entertainment module, multi-protocol device integration, end-to-end encryption, and audio-based distress signal recognition. The blockchain logging system was also tested under data stress scenarios to evaluate performance under concurrent access, which is a common practice for prototypes. Integration with hospital information systems and national electronic health records is under development and has not yet been validated in live settings.
The system’s hardware is designed to be compatible with various medical devices used in hospital settings, including heart rate monitors, ventilators, infusion pumps, and oxygen delivery systems, utilizing multiple protocols and interfaces. This enables medical professionals to access a comprehensive view of their patients’ health data.
The prototype is planned to integrate with hospital information systems and national patient records, providing a broader context for patient monitoring. This holistic approach allows medical specialists to obtain a complete view of each patient’s condition, leading to better and more personalized care.
A streaming, gaming, and social media module is being introduced to enhance patient well-being. Emotional health is directly linked to physical recovery and resilience. Hospital environments can often feel depressing and discouraging, especially for children. By integrating entertainment options, the system aims to create a more positive atmosphere, distracting patients from unpleasant medical procedures and fostering a more comfortable recovery experience.
The inclusion of a patient entertainment module (streaming, gaming, social media) addresses emotional well-being—particularly valuable in pediatric and long-term care settings—by improving patient morale and promoting recovery. Additionally, studies by Yilmaz et al. [21] confirm the therapeutic impact of entertainment and engagement tools in improving patient outcomes in connected care environments. Research on ZigBee-based IoT network security simulation tools by Yordanova et al. [22] further supports the relevance of robust IoT communication layers for healthcare monitoring applications. Despite these advantages, challenges remain, including infrastructure readiness, staff training requirements, and interoperability with legacy hospital systems. Continuous feedback and iterative development are essential to refining system performance and integration.

4. Key Findings

  • LifeLink Monitoring optimizes healthcare workflows by offloading routine tasks from medical personnel.
  • Real-time video streaming and AI analysis enhance the detection of emergencies and streamline response coordination.
  • Blockchain-enabled data integrity ensures secure and verifiable patient records.
  • The system’s modular design and security framework ensure flexibility, data privacy, and regulatory compliance.
  • Facial expression analysis to detect pain, emotional distress, and early signs of severe conditions such as strokes.
  • Body position analysis to identify falls, unusual gestures, or abnormal movements.
  • Audio analysis and speech recognition to detect distress signals or abnormal speech.
  • Integration with hospital information systems and entertainment modules promotes holistic, patient-centered care. Integration with medical devices for real-time monitoring of temperature, heart rate, oxygen levels, ECG readings, etc.

5. Conclusions

LifeLink Monitoring exemplifies a next-generation remote patient monitoring solution tailored to modern healthcare challenges. By leveraging AI, real-time analytics, secure architecture, and modular integration, it supports both clinical efficiency and patient experience. As healthcare systems continue to face workforce shortages and rising care demands, such intelligent platforms are critical to ensuring sustainable, high-quality healthcare delivery.
Future developments will focus on enhancing interoperability with a broader range of medical devices, integrating predictive analytics for proactive care interventions, and expanding multilingual support for global deployment. The addition of haptic feedback, biometric-based user authentication, and improved adaptive learning algorithms will further refine the system’s functionality, personalization, and security. Longitudinal studies and pilot implementations in clinical environments will be conducted to validate outcomes and drive the evidence-based evolution of the platform.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Georgi Patrikov was employed by the company Nex Gen Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Health Strategy 2025–2028. 2025. Available online: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/documents/about-us/general-programme-of-work/global-health-strategy-2025-2028.pdf?sfvrsn=237faeeb_3 (accessed on 9 April 2025).
  2. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Health at a Glance: Europe 2024. 2024. Available online: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-europe-2024_4d55b98f-en (accessed on 9 April 2025).
  3. OECD. Bulgaria: Country Health Profile 2023; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2023; Available online: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/bulgaria-country-health-profile-2023_8d90f882-en.html (accessed on 9 April 2025).
  4. European Commission. State of Health in the EU: Bulgaria—Country Health Profile 2023. 2023. Available online: https://health.ec.europa.eu/state-health-eu/country-health-profiles_en (accessed on 9 April 2025).
  5. Bulgarian Ministry of Health. National Strategy for the Development of the Healthcare Workforce 2023–2030. 2023. Available online: https://www.mh.government.bg (accessed on 9 April 2025).
  6. Dimitrova, M.; Dimitrov, R.; Ahchiyska, K.; Nikolaeva, M.; Ganova, M.; Petrova, G. An assessment of pharmaceutical practice in Bulgaria. Pharmacia 2023, 70, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kilova, K.; Pencheva, R.; Alakidi, A.; Mihaylova, V.; Mateva, N. The opportunities of telemedicine in Bulgaria in the conditions of COVID-19—A survey. Gen. Med. 2021, 23, 11–19. (In Bulgarian) [Google Scholar]
  8. Batool, I. Remote patient monitoring and wearable devices. arXiv 2025. Available online: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.01027 (accessed on 9 April 2025).
  9. El-Saleh, A.A.; Sheikh, A.M.; Albreem, M.A.M.; Honnurvali, M.S. Intelligent healthcare networks. Wirel. Netw. 2025, 31, 327–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. R, G.; S, M.; Mathivanan, S.K.; Shivahare, B.D.; Chandan, R.R.; Shah, M.A. AI for healthcare analytics. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 15661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Arefin, T.; Azad, A. Blockchain solutions for health monitoring. J. Comput. Commun. 2024, 12, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Claggett, J.; Petter, S.; Joshi, A.; Ponzio, T.; Kirkendall, E. Telehealth platform adoption in hospitals. J. Med. Internet Res. 2024, 26, e51234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tan, S.Y.; Sumner, J.; Wang, Y.; Yip, A.W. Digital interventions for healthcare improvement. npj Digit. Med. 2024, 7, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Agali, K.; Masrom, M.; Abdul Rahim, F.; Yahya, Y. IoT-enabled health applications. Healthc. Technol. Lett. 2024, 11, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chandak, S.; Thapa, I.; Bambos, N.; Scheinker, D. Tiered Service Architecture for Remote Patient Monitoring. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381736472_Tiered_Service_Architecture_for_Remote_Patient_Monitoring (accessed on 9 April 2025).
  16. Pagan, J.; Fallahzadeh, R.; Pedram, M.; Risco-Martín José, L.; Moya, J.M.; Ayala, J.L.; Ghasemzadeh, H. Toward Ultra-Low-Power Remote Health Monitoring: An Optimal and Adaptive Compressed Sensing Framework for Activity Recognition. arXiv 2023. Available online: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09238 (accessed on 9 April 2025).
  17. Chikalanov, A.; Kirilov, L.; Nikolov, R.; Lyubenova, M.; Petkov, Y. Smart healthcare systems in Bulgaria. Proc. Bulg. Acad. Sci. 2024, 77, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Efendi, A.; Ammarullah, M.I.; Isa, I.G.T.; Sari, M.P.; Izza, J.N.; Nugroho, Y.S.; Nasrullah, H.; Alfian, D. Health data analytics and AI. Health Sci. Rep. 2025, 8, e70498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Jat, A.S.; Grønli, T.-M. Secure data handling in remote care. arXiv 2024. Available online: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.14190 (accessed on 9 April 2025).
  20. Tenovi. Remote Patient Monitoring: Latest Research. Available online: https://www.tenovi.com/remote-patient-monitoring-latest-research/ (accessed on 9 April 2025).
  21. Yilmaz, R. (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Narrative Interactions; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yordanova, M.; Haka, A.; Aleksieva, V.; Valchanov, H. A Simulation Tool for Security in ZigBee-Based IoT Networks. Eng. Proc. 2024, 70, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. LifeLink monitoring system architecture.
Figure 1. LifeLink monitoring system architecture.
Engproc 104 00068 g001
Figure 2. AI-based video and audio analysis pipeline.
Figure 2. AI-based video and audio analysis pipeline.
Engproc 104 00068 g002
Figure 3. LifeLink monitoring system.
Figure 3. LifeLink monitoring system.
Engproc 104 00068 g003
Table 1. Traditional RPM vs. LifeLink monitoring capabilities.
Table 1. Traditional RPM vs. LifeLink monitoring capabilities.
FeatureTraditional RPMLifeLink Monitoring
Physiological Monitoring
Real-Time Video
Audio Analysis
AI Pattern RecognitionLimitedAdvanced
QR-Code Alert Closure
Emotional Health Module
Blockchain Security
Multimodal IntegrationPartialFull
Modular DeploymentFixedFlexible
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Patrikov, G.; Bakardjieva, T.; Ivanova, A.; Ivanova, A.; Sapundzhi, F. A Prototype of Integrated Remote Patient Monitoring System. Eng. Proc. 2025, 104, 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025104068

AMA Style

Patrikov G, Bakardjieva T, Ivanova A, Ivanova A, Sapundzhi F. A Prototype of Integrated Remote Patient Monitoring System. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 104(1):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025104068

Chicago/Turabian Style

Patrikov, Georgi, Teodora Bakardjieva, Antonina Ivanova, Andriana Ivanova, and Fatima Sapundzhi. 2025. "A Prototype of Integrated Remote Patient Monitoring System" Engineering Proceedings 104, no. 1: 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025104068

APA Style

Patrikov, G., Bakardjieva, T., Ivanova, A., Ivanova, A., & Sapundzhi, F. (2025). A Prototype of Integrated Remote Patient Monitoring System. Engineering Proceedings, 104(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025104068

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop