Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Hydrogen on Crack Initiation and Propagation in Pearlitic Structures: A Molecular Dynamics Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Fueling

by
Sahil Sanjay Birwatkar
1,
Ioannis Vasilios Manousiouthakis
2,3 and
Vasilios Ioannis Manousiouthakis
1,2,*
1
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
2
COSMOS Cluster 4: High Success: Hydrogen Is Green Headway to SUstainability, Carbon Capture, Energy-transition, and SuStainizability®, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
3
Hydrogen Engineering Research Company, LLC. (H-E-R-C, LLC.), Los Angeles, CA 90077, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hydrogen 2026, 7(2), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7020082 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 11 June 2025 / Revised: 26 May 2026 / Accepted: 3 June 2026 / Published: 14 June 2026

Abstract

The development of hydrogen fueling processes is an essential infrastructure component needed for the adoption of hydrogen-fueled vehicles as a transportation technology. This study provides techno-economic analysis (TEA) for two hydrogen fueling pathways (Case A, Case B), one of which (Case A) does not employ hydrogen liquefaction, while the other one (Case B) does. Both cases consider the same conditions as one another, of gaseous hydrogen inlet availability and gaseous hydrogen outlet dispensing. The TEA analysis carried out is based on data supported from the literature and process flowsheet UNISIM® software simulations. The obtained TEA results indicate that the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) of the gaseous hydrogen Case A is USD 4.20/kg H2, which is lower than the LCOH of the liquefied hydrogen Case B, which is USD 10.14/kg H2. Given the energy equivalence of a gallon of gasoline to kgH2, and the higher efficiencies of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles over gasoline vehicles, the above conditions suggest that Case B fueling (with hydrogen liquefaction) involves high energy consumption and may delay the growth of hydrogen-fuel-based transportation technology, while Case A fueling (no hydrogen liquefaction) will likely become preferrable over both Case B hydrogen fueling and gasoline fueling, thus accelerating the growth of hydrogen-fuel-based transportation technology.
Keywords: hydrogen fueling; hydrogen-fueled vehicles; hydrogen liquefaction; LCOH; techno-economic analysis hydrogen fueling; hydrogen-fueled vehicles; hydrogen liquefaction; LCOH; techno-economic analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Birwatkar, S.S.; Manousiouthakis, I.V.; Manousiouthakis, V.I. Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Fueling. Hydrogen 2026, 7, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7020082

AMA Style

Birwatkar SS, Manousiouthakis IV, Manousiouthakis VI. Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Fueling. Hydrogen. 2026; 7(2):82. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7020082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Birwatkar, Sahil Sanjay, Ioannis Vasilios Manousiouthakis, and Vasilios Ioannis Manousiouthakis. 2026. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Fueling" Hydrogen 7, no. 2: 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7020082

APA Style

Birwatkar, S. S., Manousiouthakis, I. V., & Manousiouthakis, V. I. (2026). Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Fueling. Hydrogen, 7(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7020082

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop