This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Fueling
by
Sahil Sanjay Birwatkar
Sahil Sanjay Birwatkar 1
,
Ioannis Vasilios Manousiouthakis
Ioannis Vasilios Manousiouthakis 2,3 and
Vasilios Ioannis Manousiouthakis
Vasilios Ioannis Manousiouthakis 1,2,*
1
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
2
COSMOS Cluster 4: High Success: Hydrogen Is Green Headway to SUstainability, Carbon Capture, Energy-transition, and SuStainizability®, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
3
Hydrogen Engineering Research Company, LLC. (H-E-R-C, LLC.), Los Angeles, CA 90077, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hydrogen 2026, 7(2), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7020082 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 11 June 2025
/
Revised: 26 May 2026
/
Accepted: 3 June 2026
/
Published: 14 June 2026
Abstract
The development of hydrogen fueling processes is an essential infrastructure component needed for the adoption of hydrogen-fueled vehicles as a transportation technology. This study provides techno-economic analysis (TEA) for two hydrogen fueling pathways (Case A, Case B), one of which (Case A) does not employ hydrogen liquefaction, while the other one (Case B) does. Both cases consider the same conditions as one another, of gaseous hydrogen inlet availability and gaseous hydrogen outlet dispensing. The TEA analysis carried out is based on data supported from the literature and process flowsheet UNISIM® software simulations. The obtained TEA results indicate that the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) of the gaseous hydrogen Case A is USD 4.20/kg H2, which is lower than the LCOH of the liquefied hydrogen Case B, which is USD 10.14/kg H2. Given the energy equivalence of a gallon of gasoline to kgH2, and the higher efficiencies of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles over gasoline vehicles, the above conditions suggest that Case B fueling (with hydrogen liquefaction) involves high energy consumption and may delay the growth of hydrogen-fuel-based transportation technology, while Case A fueling (no hydrogen liquefaction) will likely become preferrable over both Case B hydrogen fueling and gasoline fueling, thus accelerating the growth of hydrogen-fuel-based transportation technology.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Birwatkar, S.S.; Manousiouthakis, I.V.; Manousiouthakis, V.I.
Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Fueling. Hydrogen 2026, 7, 82.
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7020082
AMA Style
Birwatkar SS, Manousiouthakis IV, Manousiouthakis VI.
Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Fueling. Hydrogen. 2026; 7(2):82.
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7020082
Chicago/Turabian Style
Birwatkar, Sahil Sanjay, Ioannis Vasilios Manousiouthakis, and Vasilios Ioannis Manousiouthakis.
2026. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Fueling" Hydrogen 7, no. 2: 82.
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7020082
APA Style
Birwatkar, S. S., Manousiouthakis, I. V., & Manousiouthakis, V. I.
(2026). Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Fueling. Hydrogen, 7(2), 82.
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7020082
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.