Next Article in Journal
Concrete vs. Ceramic Blocks: Environmental Impact Evaluation Considering a Country-Level Approach
Previous Article in Journal
An Exploratory Analysis of the FAIRTRADE Certified Producer Organisations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Comparative Review of Alternative Fuels for the Maritime Sector: Economic, Technology, and Policy Challenges for Clean Energy Implementation

Centre for Marine Sustainability, Faculty of Creative Industries, Architecture and Engineering, Solent University, East Park Terrace, Southampton SO14 0YN, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
World 2021, 2(4), 456-481; https://doi.org/10.3390/world2040029
Submission received: 5 June 2021 / Revised: 1 October 2021 / Accepted: 11 October 2021 / Published: 21 October 2021

Abstract

Global maritime transportation is responsible for around 3% of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and significant proportions of SOx, NOx, and PM emissions. Considering the predicted growth in shipping volumes to 2050, greenhouse gas emissions from ships must be cut by 75–85% per ton-mile to meet Paris Agreement goals. This study reviews the potential of a range of alternative fuels for decarbonisation in maritime. A systematic literature review and information synthesis method was applied to evaluate fuel characteristics, production pathways, utilization technologies, energy efficiency, lifecycle environmental performance, economic viability, and current applicable policies. Alternative fuels are essential to decarbonisation in international shipping. However, findings suggest there is no single route to deliver the required greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Emissions reductions vary widely depending on the production pathways of the fuel. Alternative fuels utilising a carbon-intensive production pathway will not provide decarbonisation, instead shifting emissions elsewhere in the supply chain. Ultimately, a system-wide perspective to creating an effective policy framework is required in order to promote the adoption of alternative propulsion technologies.
Keywords: maritime; decarbonisation; hydrogen; methane; ammonia; nitrogen dioxide; sulphur dioxide maritime; decarbonisation; hydrogen; methane; ammonia; nitrogen dioxide; sulphur dioxide

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Wright, L.A. A Comparative Review of Alternative Fuels for the Maritime Sector: Economic, Technology, and Policy Challenges for Clean Energy Implementation. World 2021, 2, 456-481. https://doi.org/10.3390/world2040029

AMA Style

Wang Y, Wright LA. A Comparative Review of Alternative Fuels for the Maritime Sector: Economic, Technology, and Policy Challenges for Clean Energy Implementation. World. 2021; 2(4):456-481. https://doi.org/10.3390/world2040029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yifan, and Laurence A. Wright. 2021. "A Comparative Review of Alternative Fuels for the Maritime Sector: Economic, Technology, and Policy Challenges for Clean Energy Implementation" World 2, no. 4: 456-481. https://doi.org/10.3390/world2040029

APA Style

Wang, Y., & Wright, L. A. (2021). A Comparative Review of Alternative Fuels for the Maritime Sector: Economic, Technology, and Policy Challenges for Clean Energy Implementation. World, 2(4), 456-481. https://doi.org/10.3390/world2040029

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop