Next Article in Journal
Effects of Hydrosalpinx on Endometrial Receptivity and Uterine Microbiome: An Interesting Case of Double Uterus with Unilateral Hydrosalpinx
Next Article in Special Issue
Dysmetabolic Iron Overload Syndrome: Going beyond the Traditional Risk Factors Associated with Metabolic Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Diabetic Ketoacidosis Management: Updates and Challenges for Specific Patient Population
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Initial ATA Risk Classification, but Not the AJCC/TNM Stage, Predicts the Persistence or Relapse of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer in Long-Term Surveillance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone Antagonist JV-1-36 Suppresses Reactive Oxygen Species Generation in A549 Lung Cancer Cells

by
Khadeja-Tul Kubra
,
Mohammad S. Akhter
,
Kaitlyn Apperley
and
Nektarios Barabutis
*
School of Basic Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana Monroe, 1800 Bienville Drive, Monroe, LA 71201, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Endocrines 2022, 3(4), 813-820; https://doi.org/10.3390/endocrines3040067
Submission received: 20 October 2022 / Revised: 24 November 2022 / Accepted: 7 December 2022 / Published: 9 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Endocrines)

Abstract

:
Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and its receptors are expressed in a variety of human cancers, and have been involved in malignancies. GHRH antagonists (GHRHAnt) were developed to suppress tumor progression and metastasis. Previous studies demonstrate the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cancer progression. Herein, we investigate the effect of a commercially available GHRH antagonist, namely JV-1-36, in the redox status of the A549 human cancer cell line. Our results suggest that this peptide significantly reduces ROS production in those cells in a time-dependent manner and counteracts H2O2-induced ROS. Our study supports the anti-oxidative effects of JV-1-36 and contributes in our knowledge towards the in vitro effects of GHRHAnt in cancers.

1. Introduction

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) is a hypothalamic hormone which regulates the release of growth hormone (GH) from the anterior pituitary gland. It consists of 44 amino acids and has been involved in mitogenic processes of a diverse variety of human malignancies including breast, lung, ovary, and prostate cancers [1]. It can directly bind to the pituitary-type GHRH receptor (GHRH-R), a member of the class B G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family [2]. That binding activates signaling cascades which promote cancer aggression and inflammation, at least in part due to insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) release [1].
GHRH-R shares homology with the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), pituitary adenyl cyclase activating polypeptide, and calcitonin receptors. The NH2-terminal 29 amino-acid sequence of GHRH preserves its biological activity [3]. GHRH-R contains seven hydrophobic transmembrane domains and regulates cell cycle progression and differentiation [4]. The proliferation rate of breast, prostate, and lung cancer cells is suppressed when intrinsic GHRH production is silenced due to small interfering RNA specifically designed for this neuropeptide [5]. Moreover, active receptors for GHRH were detected in surgical specimens of human prostate, ovarian, endometrial, adrenal, and pancreatic cancers [6]. Considering that GHRH is ectopically expressed, it was suggested that it can act as an autocrine/paracrine growth factor in tumor development [7].
Splice variants (SVs) of GHRH-R were detected in a diverse variety of human and animal tissues, including the lungs [8]. Although several SVs were characterized, SV1 is the most abundantly expressed and possesses ligand-dependent and -independent activities [9]. Pancreatic, colon, and gastric cancer cells expressed mRNA for both GHRH and SV1 [10]. That discovery shed light onto the mechanisms mediating the anti-cancer activities of GHRHAnt [1].
Reactive oxygen species (ROS), a byproduct of cellular respiration, can deteriorate DNA, proteins, and lipids [11]. Those oxidants potentiate angiogenesis, metastasis, and survival. ROS can trigger mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1/2 (MAPK/ERK1/2), p38, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), phosphoinositide-3-kinase/ protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt), nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [12]. GHRHAnt inhibit those cascades, which in turn suppress ROS generation [13,14]. Our study investigates for the first time the anti-oxidative effects of JV-1-36 in the H2O2-induced A549 ROS generation. The outcomes substantiate ongoing research on the beneficial effects of GHRHAnt in lung maintenance and function, and provide new information in the corresponding context.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Anti-mouse IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-linked whole antibody from sheep (95017-554), anti-rabbit IgG HRP-linked whole antibody from donkey (95017-556), nitrocellulose membranes (10063-173), radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (AAJ63306-AP), 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFDA) (10180-506), and 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) (BT142015-5G) were obtained from VWR (Radnor, PA, USA). The GHRH-R antibody (ab28692) was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). GHRHAnt JV-1-36 (031-23) was obtained from Phoenix pharmaceuticals Inc. (Burlingame, CA, USA), and H2O2 (H1009) from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Western Blot Analysis

Cell proteins were isolated with RIPA buffer. Equal protein amounts were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS–PAGE) Tris-HCl gel electrophoresis. Wet transfer was used to pass the proteins onto nitrocellulose membranes, which were incubated for 60 min at room temperature in 5% nonfat dry milk, so to cover non-specific binding sites. Those membranes were then exposed overnight (4 °C) to appropriate primary antibodies (1:1000). The signal for the immunoreactive proteins was developed by using the corresponding secondary antibodies (1:2000). Chemiluminescent substrate (VWR, Radnor, PA, USA) was used to develop the signal, visualized in a ChemiDoc Touch Imaging System from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). The β-actin antibody was used as a loading control.

2.3. Cell Culture

Human lung cancer cells A549 and cervical cancer cells HeLa were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). They were cultured in DMEM (VWRL0101-0500) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1X penicillin/streptomycin. Cultures were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2–95% air. All reagents were purchased from VWR (Radnor, PA, USA).

2.4. Measurement of Cell Viability

A549 and HeLa cells were seeded onto 96-well culture plates (10,000 cells/well) in complete growth media, and were treated with GHRHAnt (0.01–15 μM) and H2O2 (0.001–2 mM) for 8 hours (h). After that time-point, the media was replaced with serum-free media containing 5 mg/mL MTT, and incubated for 3.5 h. DMSO (100 μL/well) was added to dissolve MTT crystals, and 15 min later, absorbance was measured (570 nm) utilizing the SPECTROstar Nano® Absorbance Plate Reader by BMG LABTECH.

2.5. Cell Treatment and ROS Measurement

Cells were seeded onto a 96-well plate at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well, and were exposed to vehicle (0.1% DMSO) or GHRHAnt (1 μM) for 4, 8, 16, or 24 h. In another set of experiments, cells were treated with vehicle (0.1% DMSO) or GHRHAnt (1 μM) for 8 h, before their exposure to vehicle (PBS) or H2O2 (0.1 mM) for 8 h. After those treatments, the cells were incubated with 25 μΜ of DCFDA for 45 min. The fluorescence intensity was measured by the fluorescence plate reader (Synergy H1 Hybrid Multi-Mode Reader from Biotek) using the excitation wavelength of 485 nm and emission wavelength of 535 nm.

3. Results

3.1. Expression of GHRH-R in Cancer Cells

The expression of GHRH-R in A549 human lung and HeLa cervical cancer cells was analyzed by Western blot analysis. The HeLa cell line was used as a negative control, due to the absence of GHRH-R [15]. Our results suggest that A549 express GHRH-R (Figure 1A).

3.2. Effects of GHRHAnt on Cell Viability in A549 Cells

The lung cancer cells were seeded onto 96-well culture plates (10,000 cells/well) in complete growth media and were treated with either vehicle (0.1% DMSO) or JV-1-36 (0.01–15 μM). After 8 h, the media was replaced with fresh media containing 5 mg/mL MTT. After 3.5 h of incubation, DMSO was added to dissolve the MTT crystals, and absorbance was measured. Our results suggest that moderate concentrations of GHRHAnt (0.01–2 μΜ) do not exhibit toxicity in A549 cells. However, JV-1-36 (5–15 μΜ) reduced cell viability at higher concentrations (Figure 1B).

3.3. Effects of GHRHAnt on Cell Viability in HeLa Cells

Cells were seeded onto a 96-well plate (10,000 cells in each well) and were treated with either vehicle (0.1% DMSO) or JV-1-36 (0.01–15 μM) (8 h). Our observations suggest that moderate concentrations of GHRHAnt (0.01–1 μΜ) do not affect cell viability. However, in higher concentrations, JV-1-36 (2–15 μM) reduced cell viability (Figure 1C).

3.4. Effects of H2O2 on A549 Cell Viability

A549 cells were treated with either vehicle (PBS) or H2O2 (0.001–2 mM) for 8 h. As shown in Figure 1D, H2O2 at 0.001–0.5 mM did not significantly affect A549. Those groups exposed to higher concentrations (1–2 mM) of that ROS generator depicted low viability levels.

3.5. Effects of H2O2 on HeLa Cell Viability

HeLa cells were exposed to vehicle (PBS) or H2O2 (0.001–2 mM) (8 h). At the concentrations of 0.001–0.1 mM, H2O2 did not affect cell viability, in contrast to the higher doses (0.5–2 mM) (Figure 1E).

3.6. Effects of GHRHAnt on ROS Generation in A549 and HeLa Cells

Cells were exposed to either vehicle (0.1% DMSO) or GHRHAnt (1 μM) for 4, 8, 16, and 24 h. Our results demonstrate that GHRHAnt JV-1-36 inhibits ROS production in A549 cells (Figure 2A), while HeLa cells were unaffected (Figure 2B). The latter cell line does not express GHRH-R.

3.7. Effects of GHRHAnt on H2O2-Induced ROS Generation in A549 and HeLa Cells

To evaluate the effects of GHRHAnt JV-1-36 on H2O2-induced ROS generation, the cells were exposed to vehicle (0.1% DMSO) or JV-1-36 (1 μΜ) for 8 h prior to H2O2 (0.1 mΜ, 8 h) exposure. Our results demonstrate a significant induction of ROS by H2O2 in A549 cells, while GHRHAnt prevented that effect (Figure 2C). That antagonist did not affect the HeLa cells (Figure 2D).

4. Discussion

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are partially reduced metabolites of oxygen, characterized by strong oxidizing capabilities. The majority of those radicals are produced by mitochondria as a result of oxidative phosphorylation. The electron transport chain is a mitochondrial pathway that encompasses five multimeric complexes. Complex I and III generate superoxide toward the matrix and intermembrane space [16]. ROS contribute to tumor development by enhancing cell survival, proliferation, protein synthesis, and glucose metabolism [12,17]. Moreover, these oxygen radicals are associated with inflammation progression. Superoxide anion (O2−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are second messengers capable of releasing growth factors, chemokines, and cytokines [18].
H2O2 is derived from membrane and mitochondrial sources, and it reversibly oxidizes cysteine residues (e.g., protein tyrosine phosphatases, protein tyrosine kinases, receptor tyrosine kinases) [19]. This ROS inducer is produced by epithelial cells during wound healing, and triggers the conversion of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts [20]. However, H2O2 production can impair DNA and cell metabolism, partially due to the Fenton reaction-induced hydroxyl radical (OH) [21]. At low concentrations, it mediates cell growth via mitogenic oxidase Nox1, a homologue of gp91phox [22]. In higher concentrations, H2O2 triggers pro-inflammatory mediators, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) [23].
Cancer and inflammation are interrelated [24,25], whereas the latter condition exacerbates cardiovascular complications, diabetes, arthritis, Alzheimer’s disease, pulmonary, and autoimmune disorders [26]. GHRHAnt counteract metastasis [1,27,28], and A549 cells were utilized to assess the effects of those compounds in H2O2-induced ROS generation. HeLa cells were used to assess specificity, since they do not respond to GHRH (Figure 1A) [4].
GHRHAnt JV-1-36 significantly reduced ROS production in lung cancer cells (Figure 2A), whereas ROS generation in HeLa cells was unaffected (Figure 2B). HeLa cells do not respond to GHRH, since they lack the corresponding receptors (Figure 1A) [15]. Figure 2C demonstrates the significant induction of ROS by H2O2 in A549 cells and demonstrates that JV-1-36 exerted anti-oxidative effects in those cells. However, no changes were observed in HeLa cells (Figure 1D). Those outcomes align with previous observations on the anti-oxidative effects of another GHRHAnt, namely JMR132, in prostate cancers. It was reported that cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) and cytochrome c oxidase IV (COX-IV) were involved in those effects, since GHRHAnt suppressed their expression [17]. The anti-oxidative effects of GHRHAnt are not limited to malignancies. Indeed, the GHRHAnt MZ-5-156 was shown to reduce oxidative stress in aging mice brain, as reflected in the glutathione (GSH) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) expression levels [29].
GHRHAnt can suppress inflammation in normal lung microvascular endothelial cells via redox modulation [30,31]. Highly reactive oxygen metabolites are associated with acute lung injury (ALI), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), asthma, and cystic fibrosis [31,32]. Superoxide dismutase produces H2O2 from superoxide anion, which produces hydroxyl radicals. Chronic exposure in H2O2 increases pulmonary artery pressure and vascular permeability, inflicting lung damage [32]. It has been previously reported that GHRHAnt suppress NF-κΒ [33], inducible nitric oxide synthase [34], and induces the tumor suppressor P53 [35]. This transcription factor reduces ROS production by controlling the expression of antioxidant genes such as superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2), glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX1), and catalase (CAT) [36].
P53 coordinates a complex framework to maintain cell homeostasis and genome stability [37]. In addition, it regulates redox homeostasis through transcriptional and non-transcriptional activities. P53 induction suppresses oxidative stress in the lung endothelium, as indicated by the reduced expression of the lipid peroxidation marker malondialdehyde (MDA) [24,30,31]. Moreover, NIMA-related kinases, or never-in-mitosis-A-related kinases (NEKs), are involved in the regulation of P53. NEK2, NEK3, NEK4, NEK7, and NEK9 upregulation has been observed in the lungs of septic mice [38]. NEK2 phosphorylates P53 at Ser315 and decreases its stability [39]. Suppression of this transcription factor by a high glucose (HG) levels is associated with HG-induced oxidative stress in endothelial cells, leading to endothelial damage and tissue injury [40]. GHRHAnt can induce P53 expression levels in both lung endothelial cells [15,41] and cancers [17], indicating that the antioxidant effects of those peptides may be mediated by P53, a UPR downstream target. However, additional studies are needed to interrogate the molecular cascades involved in those events.
UPR consists of protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase (PERK), inositol requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) [42,43]. ATF6 was reported to participate in adaptive responses, so to ameliorate severe inflammatory disorders [44,45]. Perturbation of protein folding promotes the dissociation of binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP) or 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP-78) from the luminal domain of those sensors, which in turn activates UPR [44]. UPR can also mediate the protective effects of GHRHAnt in barrier dysregulation, a hallmark of the potentially lethal ARDS. GHRHAnt counteracted the kifunensine (UPR suppressor)-induced lung endothelial barrier dysfunction [31]. ARDS is responsible for the death of millions worldwide due to COVID-19; and targeted medicine for that disorder does not exist, so far. UPR can also positively regulate P53, and its modulation regulates barrier function [46]. Hence, GHRHAnt/UPR/P53 may form an autoregulatory loop to protect against barrier disorders. Further research will shed light on the role of UPR in the anti-oxidative activities of GHRHAnt in the P53 context. To do so, we will utilize genetically modified mice which express more or less of P53, and elevated UPR levels, as performed before [44,47,48].
Our observations reveal that JV-1-36 exerts anti-oxidative effects in A549 lung cancer cells. Considering the anti-inflammatory effects of GHRHAnt in normal lung endothelial cells, and their anti-oxidative activities in the inflamed endothelium [31], we conclude that GHRHAnt represent an exciting therapeutic possibility for the treatment of lung inflammatory diseases. Future studies will address the exact interrelations of GHRHAnt, UPR, and P53 in cancers, utilizing transgenic mice and genetically modified cancer cells.

Author Contributions

K.-T.K.: writing—original draft preparation, investigation, M.S.A.: investigation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing, K.A.: writing—review and editing, N.B.: visualization, supervision, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research reported herein was supported by the R&D, Research Competitiveness Subprogram (RCS) of the Louisiana Board of Regents through the Board of Regents Support Fund {Funding Number: LEQSF(2019-22)-RD-A-26} (Principal Investigator: N.B.), as well as by the Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (Funding Number: 3P20GM103424-20S1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schally, A.V.; Varga, J.L.; Engel, J.B. Antagonists of growth-hormone-releasing hormone: An emerging new therapy for cancer. Nat. Clin. Pract. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 4, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhou, F.; Zhang, H.; Cong, Z.; Zhao, L.H.; Zhou, Q.; Mao, C.; Cheng, X.; Shen, D.D.; Cai, X.; Ma, C.; et al. Structural basis for activation of the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Schally, A.V.; Zhang, X.; Cai, R.; Hare, J.M.; Granata, R.; Bartoli, M. Actions and Potential Therapeutic Applications of Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonists. Endocrinology 2019, 160, 1600–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shohreh, R.; Sherafat-Kazemzadeh, R.; Jee, Y.H.; Blitz, A.; Salvatori, R. A novel frame shift mutation in the GHRH receptor gene in familial isolated GH deficiency: Early occurrence of anterior pituitary hypoplasia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 2982–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Barabutis, N.; Schally, A.V. Knocking down gene expression for growth hormone-releasing hormone inhibits proliferation of human cancer cell lines. Br. J. Cancer 2008, 98, 1790–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Szabo, Z.; Juhasz, E.; Schally, A.V.; Dezso, B.; Huga, S.; Hernadi, Z.; Halmos, G.; Kiss, C. Expression of Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone and Its Receptor Splice Variants in Primary Human Endometrial Carcinomas: Novel Therapeutic Approaches. Molecules 2022, 27, 2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kiaris, H.; Chatzistamou, I. Inhibition of tumor growth by agonists of growth hormone-releasing hormone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 11876–11878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Havt, A.; Schally, A.V.; Halmos, G.; Varga, J.L.; Toller, G.L.; Horvath, J.E.; Szepeshazi, K.; Koster, F.; Kovitz, K.; Groot, K.; et al. The expression of the pituitary growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor and its splice variants in normal and neoplastic human tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 17424–17429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kiaris, H.; Chatzistamou, I.; Schally, A.V.; Halmos, G.; Varga, J.L.; Koutselini, H.; Kalofoutis, A. Ligand-dependent and -independent effects of splice variant 1 of growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 9512–9517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Busto, R.; Schally, A.V.; Varga, J.L.; Garcia-Fernandez, M.O.; Groot, K.; Armatis, P.; Szepeshazi, K. The expression of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and splice variants of its receptor in human gastroenteropancreatic carcinomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 11866–11871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nita, M.; Grzybowski, A. The Role of the Reactive Oxygen Species and Oxidative Stress in the Pathomechanism of the Age-Related Ocular Diseases and Other Pathologies of the Anterior and Posterior Eye Segments in Adults. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2016, 2016, 3164734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Aggarwal, V.; Tuli, H.S.; Varol, A.; Thakral, F.; Yerer, M.B.; Sak, K.; Varol, M.; Jain, A.; Khan, M.A.; Sethi, G. Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Cancer Progression: Molecular Mechanisms and Recent Advancements. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Kanashiro, C.A.; Schally, A.V.; Groot, K.; Armatis, P.; Bernardino, A.L.; Varga, J.L. Inhibition of mutant p53 expression and growth of DMS-153 small cell lung carcinoma by antagonists of growth hormone-releasing hormone and bombesin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 15836–15841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Kiaris, H.; Koutsilieris, M.; Kalofoutis, A.; Schally, A.V. Growth hormone-releasing hormone and extra-pituitary tumorigenesis: Therapeutic and diagnostic applications of growth hormone-releasing hormone antagonists. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2003, 12, 1385–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Uddin, M.A.; Akhter, M.S.; Singh, S.S.; Kubra, K.T.; Schally, A.V.; Jois, S.; Barabutis, N. GHRH antagonists support lung endothelial barrier function. Tissue Barriers 2019, 7, 1669989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Han, D.; Williams, E.; Cadenas, E. Mitochondrial respiratory chain-dependent generation of superoxide anion and its release into the intermembrane space. Biochem. J. 2001, 353, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Barabutis, N.; Schally, A.V. Antioxidant activity of growth hormone-releasing hormone antagonists in LNCaP human prostate cancer line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 20470–20475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Liou, G.Y.; Storz, P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic. Res. 2010, 44, 479–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Cheung, E.C.; Vousden, K.H. The role of ROS in tumour development and progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2022, 22, 280–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Niethammer, P.; Grabher, C.; Look, A.T.; Mitchison, T.J. A tissue-scale gradient of hydrogen peroxide mediates rapid wound detection in zebrafish. Nature 2009, 459, 996–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Park, S.; You, X.; Imlay, J.A. Substantial DNA damage from submicromolar intracellular hydrogen peroxide detected in Hpx- mutants of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 9317–9322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Arnold, R.S.; Shi, J.; Murad, E.; Whalen, A.M.; Sun, C.Q.; Polavarapu, R.; Parthasarathy, S.; Petros, J.A.; Lambeth, J.D. Hydrogen peroxide mediates the cell growth and transformation caused by the mitogenic oxidase Nox1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 5550–5555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Gunawardena, D.; Raju, R.; Munch, G. Hydrogen peroxide mediates pro-inflammatory cell-to-cell signaling: A new therapeutic target for inflammation? Neural Regen. Res. 2019, 14, 1430–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kubra, K.T.; Akhter, M.S.; Uddin, M.A.; Barabutis, N. P53 versus inflammation: An update. Cell Cycle 2020, 19, 160–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Singh, N.; Baby, D.; Rajguru, J.P.; Patil, P.B.; Thakkannavar, S.S.; Pujari, V.B. Inflammation and cancer. Ann. Afr. Med. 2019, 18, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aggarwal, B.B. Nuclear factor-kappaB: The enemy within. Cancer Cell 2004, 6, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Vidaurre, I.; Cai, R.; Sha, W.; Schally, A.V. Inhibition of experimental small-cell and non-small-cell lung cancers by novel antagonists of growth hormone-releasing hormone. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 142, 2394–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Szereday, Z.; Schally, A.V.; Varga, J.L.; Kanashiro, C.A.; Hebert, F.; Armatis, P.; Groot, K.; Szepeshazi, K.; Halmos, G.; Busto, R. Antagonists of growth hormone-releasing hormone inhibit the proliferation of experimental non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 7913–7919. [Google Scholar]
  29. Banks, W.A.; Morley, J.E.; Farr, S.A.; Price, T.O.; Ercal, N.; Vidaurre, I.; Schally, A.V. Effects of a growth hormone-releasing hormone antagonist on telomerase activity, oxidative stress, longevity, and aging in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 22272–22277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Akhter, M.S.; Barabutis, N. Suppression of reactive oxygen species in endothelial cells by an antagonist of growth hormone-releasing hormone. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2021, 35, e22879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barabutis, N. Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone in Endothelial Barrier Function. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 32, 338–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hammerschmidt, S.; Wahn, H. The oxidants hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide induce distinct patterns of acute lung injury. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1690, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Gan, J.; Ke, X.; Jiang, J.; Dong, H.; Yao, Z.; Lin, Y.; Lin, W.; Wu, X.; Yan, S.; Zhuang, Y.; et al. Growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor antagonists inhibit human gastric cancer through downregulation of PAK1-STAT3/NF-kappaB signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 14745–14750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Barabutis, N.; Siejka, A.; Schally, A.V. Growth hormone releasing hormone induces the expression of nitric oxide synthase. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2011, 15, 1148–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Kubra, K.T.; Barabutis, N. P53 in endothelial function and unfolded protein response regulation. Cell Biol. Int. 2022, 46, 2257–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kruiswijk, F.; Labuschagne, C.F.; Vousden, K.H. p53 in survival, death and metabolic health: A lifeguard with a licence to kill. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015, 16, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Uddin, M.A.; Barabutis, N. P53 in the impaired lungs. DNA Repair 2020, 95, 102952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Uddin, M.A.; Akhter, M.S.; Kubra, K.T.; Barabutis, N. Induction of the NEK family of kinases in the lungs of mice subjected to cecal ligation and puncture model of sepsis. Tissue Barriers 2021, 9, 1929787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Choi, B.K.; Dayaram, T.; Parikh, N.; Wilkins, A.D.; Nagarajan, M.; Novikov, I.B.; Bachman, B.J.; Jung, S.Y.; Haas, P.J.; Labrie, J.L.; et al. Literature-based automated discovery of tumor suppressor p53 phosphorylation and inhibition by NEK2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 10666–10671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wu, Y.; Lee, S.; Bobadilla, S.; Duan, S.Z.; Liu, X. High glucose-induced p53 phosphorylation contributes to impairment of endothelial antioxidant system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2017, 1863, 2355–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Akhter, M.S.; Kubra, K.T.; Barabutis, N. Protective effects of GHRH antagonists against hydrogen peroxide-induced lung endothelial barrier disruption. Endocrine 2022, 20, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Barabutis, N.; Akhter, M.S.; Uddin, M.A.; Kubra, K.T.; Schally, A.V. GHRH Antagonists Protect Against Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Breakdown of Brain Microvascular Endothelium Integrity. Horm. Metab. Res. 2020, 52, 336–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kubra, K.T.; Akhter, M.S.; Saini, Y.; Kousoulas, K.G.; Barabutis, N. Activating transcription factor 6 protects against endothelial barrier dysfunction. Cell Signal 2022, 99, 110432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kubra, K.T.; Uddin, M.A.; Barabutis, N. Tunicamycin Protects against LPS-Induced Lung Injury. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kubra, K.T.; Barabutis, N. Brefeldin A and kifunensine modulate LPS-induced lung endothelial hyperpermeability in human and bovine cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2021, 321, C214–C220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Barabutis, N. Unfolded Protein Response: A Regulator of the Endothelial Barrier. Endocr. Metab. Sci. 2021, 3, 100092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Barabutis, N.; Dimitropoulou, C.; Gregory, B.; Catravas, J.D. Wild-type p53 enhances endothelial barrier function by mediating RAC1 signalling and RhoA inhibition. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 1792–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Uddin, M.A.; Akhter, M.S.; Kubra, K.T.; Barabutis, N. P53 deficiency potentiates LPS-Induced acute lung injury in vivo. Curr. Res. Physiol. 2020, 3, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Western blot analysis of GHRH-R and β-actin in A549 and HeLa cells. The β-actin was used as a loading control. (B) A549 cells were seeded onto a 96-well plate (10,000 cells on each well) and were treated with vehicle (VEH) (0.1% DMSO) or GHRHAnt (0.01–15 μM) (8 h); and (D) VEH (PBS) or H2O2 (0.001–2 mM) (8 h). MTT assay was used to assess cell viability. n = 3 per group. Means ± SEM. (C) HeLa cells were seeded onto a 96-well plate (10,000 cells/well) and were incubated with VEH (0.1% DMSO) or GHRHAnt (0.01–15 μM); and (E) VEH (PBS) or H2O2 (0.001–2 mM) (8 h). GHRHAnt at 0.01–1 μΜ, and H2O2 at 0.001–0.1 mM did not affect HeLa viability. However, viability was reduced in cells exposed to higher concentrations of GHRHAnt (2–15 μΜ) or H2O2 (0.5–2 mΜ). The graphs represent three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. VEH. Means ± SEM.
Figure 1. (A) Western blot analysis of GHRH-R and β-actin in A549 and HeLa cells. The β-actin was used as a loading control. (B) A549 cells were seeded onto a 96-well plate (10,000 cells on each well) and were treated with vehicle (VEH) (0.1% DMSO) or GHRHAnt (0.01–15 μM) (8 h); and (D) VEH (PBS) or H2O2 (0.001–2 mM) (8 h). MTT assay was used to assess cell viability. n = 3 per group. Means ± SEM. (C) HeLa cells were seeded onto a 96-well plate (10,000 cells/well) and were incubated with VEH (0.1% DMSO) or GHRHAnt (0.01–15 μM); and (E) VEH (PBS) or H2O2 (0.001–2 mM) (8 h). GHRHAnt at 0.01–1 μΜ, and H2O2 at 0.001–0.1 mM did not affect HeLa viability. However, viability was reduced in cells exposed to higher concentrations of GHRHAnt (2–15 μΜ) or H2O2 (0.5–2 mΜ). The graphs represent three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. VEH. Means ± SEM.
Endocrines 03 00067 g001
Figure 2. GHRHAnt protect against hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-induced ROS generation. Microplate reader analysis of ROS in (A) A549 and (B) HeLa cells. The cells were treated with vehicle (VEH) (0.1% DMSO) or GHRHAnt (1 µM) for 4, 8, 16, and 24 h. The fold change in the ROS generation of GHRHAnt-treated cells was compared to the vehicle-treated cells. n = 4 per group. Means ± SEM. (C) A549 and (D) HeLa cells were pretreated with VEH (0.1% DMSO) or GHRHAnt (1 μM) for 8 h before VEH (PBS) or H2O2 (0.1 mM) exposure (8 h). The fold change in the ROS generation of the cells treated with H2O2 and/or GHRHAnt was compared to that of the cells treated with vehicle. n = 4 per group. Means ± SEM. * p < 0.05, vs. VEH; $ p < 0.05 vs. H2O2.
Figure 2. GHRHAnt protect against hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-induced ROS generation. Microplate reader analysis of ROS in (A) A549 and (B) HeLa cells. The cells were treated with vehicle (VEH) (0.1% DMSO) or GHRHAnt (1 µM) for 4, 8, 16, and 24 h. The fold change in the ROS generation of GHRHAnt-treated cells was compared to the vehicle-treated cells. n = 4 per group. Means ± SEM. (C) A549 and (D) HeLa cells were pretreated with VEH (0.1% DMSO) or GHRHAnt (1 μM) for 8 h before VEH (PBS) or H2O2 (0.1 mM) exposure (8 h). The fold change in the ROS generation of the cells treated with H2O2 and/or GHRHAnt was compared to that of the cells treated with vehicle. n = 4 per group. Means ± SEM. * p < 0.05, vs. VEH; $ p < 0.05 vs. H2O2.
Endocrines 03 00067 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kubra, K.-T.; Akhter, M.S.; Apperley, K.; Barabutis, N. Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone Antagonist JV-1-36 Suppresses Reactive Oxygen Species Generation in A549 Lung Cancer Cells. Endocrines 2022, 3, 813-820. https://doi.org/10.3390/endocrines3040067

AMA Style

Kubra K-T, Akhter MS, Apperley K, Barabutis N. Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone Antagonist JV-1-36 Suppresses Reactive Oxygen Species Generation in A549 Lung Cancer Cells. Endocrines. 2022; 3(4):813-820. https://doi.org/10.3390/endocrines3040067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kubra, Khadeja-Tul, Mohammad S. Akhter, Kaitlyn Apperley, and Nektarios Barabutis. 2022. "Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone Antagonist JV-1-36 Suppresses Reactive Oxygen Species Generation in A549 Lung Cancer Cells" Endocrines 3, no. 4: 813-820. https://doi.org/10.3390/endocrines3040067

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop