Next Article in Journal
Awareness and Decisions Regarding Elective Oocyte Cryopreservation (EOC) in Greece: A Cross-Sectional Study on Generation Z
Previous Article in Journal
Awareness and Experiences of Physiotherapy for Managing Primary Dysmenorrhea Among Women in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Ruptured Heterotopic Pregnancy: Laparoscopic Management, Preserving Intrauterine Viability

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Reprod. Med. 2026, 7(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed7010014
Submission received: 27 December 2025 / Revised: 12 February 2026 / Accepted: 13 March 2026 / Published: 17 March 2026

Abstract

Pregnancy (HP), defined as the coexistence of intrauterine and ectopic gestations, is a rare condition, especially in spontaneous conception, but it is a life-threatening obstetric emergency when rupture occurs, with a reported maternal mortality rate of 0.03%. Diagnosis is often delayed because confirmation of an intrauterine pregnancy can mask clinical signs of a concurrent ectopic gestation. Early recognition and prompt surgical intervention are therefore critical to maternal safety and preservation of intrauterine viability. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges and successful management of a spontaneous ruptured heterotopic pregnancy. Case presentation: A 34-year-old Middle Eastern woman, gravida 4, with a spontaneous conception, presented with sudden severe lower abdominal pain and signs of acute hemoperitoneum (hypotension, tachycardia, and marked peritoneal signs). Transvaginal ultrasound demonstrated a viable intrauterine pregnancy at 9 weeks 4 days gestation, together with a ruptured left tubal ectopic pregnancy of similar gestational age. The patient underwent urgent laparoscopic left salpingectomy with evacuation of approximately 1200 mL of intraperitoneal blood and clots. Postoperatively, she developed significant anemia (hemoglobin drop from 11.2 g/dL on admission to 6.5 g/dL) requiring transfusion of four units of packed red blood cells. Serial ultrasonographic follow-up confirmed ongoing viability of the intrauterine pregnancy, which ultimately resulted in a live birth at term. Progressive resolution of the postoperative pelvic hematoma was also noted. Conclusions: Ruptured heterotopic pregnancy remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. This case, along with a synthesis of the contemporary literature, demonstrates that a high clinical index of suspicion, timely ultrasound diagnosis, and immediate minimally invasive surgical management are paramount. Furthermore, rigorous postoperative monitoring and resuscitation, including targeted transfusion, are essential to achieve maternal stabilization while allowing continuation of a viable intrauterine pregnancy, with reported live birth rates exceeding 70% following timely intervention.

1. Introduction

Heterotopic pregnancy (HP), defined as the coexistence of intrauterine and ectopic gestations, is a rare but serious condition. Its incidence is estimated at approximately 1 in 30,000 in spontaneous conception, increasing to between 1 in 100 and 1 in 500 with assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) [1,2]. Clinical diagnosis remains challenging because confirmation of a viable intrauterine pregnancy may mask symptoms of a concurrent tubal ectopic gestation. The risk factors for spontaneous HP include a history of pelvic inflammatory disease, prior tubal surgery, endometriosis, and advanced maternal age, though it can occur in patients with no identifiable risk factors, as in the present case [3,4]. The patient in this report conceived spontaneously, underscoring that HP, while more common with ARTs, remains a critical consideration in spontaneous pregnancies.
Published case reports and series highlight the life-threatening potential of this condition, with reported hemoperitoneum volumes of up to 2000 mL [5], blood transfusion being required in approximately 37–45% of surgically managed cases [6,7], and salpingectomy being performed in more than 90% of cases [6,8,9]. Despite this severity, reported outcomes in cases of intrauterine pregnancy are generally favorable. Retrospective series demonstrate live birth in over 70% of patients following laparoscopic intervention [10,11], and individual case reports document continuation to term after timely surgery and transfusion support [12,13,14,15].
Laparoscopic management is currently favored, as it offers effective hemorrhage control with reduced morbidity, shorter hospital stays, and better fertility preservation, compared with laparotomy [16,17]. The cornerstone of management is rapid diagnosis, which hinges on a high index of suspicion and expert ultrasonography, followed by expedited surgical intervention [13]. We report a case of ruptured left tubal heterotopic pregnancy managed by laparoscopic salpingectomy and blood transfusion, resulting in preservation of intrauterine pregnancy viability and a subsequent live birth. This case is contextualized with a detailed review of the literature to provide a comprehensive overview of contemporary management strategies and outcomes.

2. Case Presentation

A 34-year-old Middle Eastern woman, gravida 4 para 3 (one early first-trimester spontaneous abortion, one term vaginal delivery, and one prior lower-segment cesarean section), initially presented to the emergency department ten days before the acute event with constipation and mild lower abdominal pain. At that visit, she was conscious and hemodynamically stable (blood pressure 120/80 mmHg, heart rate 78 bpm), with a pain score of 1/10. No pelvic or transvaginal ultrasound was performed at this initial presentation, as her symptoms were attributed to constipation. She was treated symptomatically with a single stat dose of intravenous paracetamol 1000 mg and prescribed oral macrogol 3350 with electrolytes, one sachet dissolved in 125 mL of water once daily for ten days.
On Day 0, she re-presented with sudden severe lower abdominal pain radiating to the left shoulder (Kehr’s sign) and marked probe tenderness on pelvic examination, with a reported pain score of 9/10. On arrival, her vital signs were: blood pressure 90/60 mmHg, heart rate 118 bpm, respiratory rate 22/min, and oxygen saturation 98% on room air. She denied fever, vaginal bleeding, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or urinary symptoms. Her past medical history was unremarkable, apart from the prior cesarean delivery. Current medications included aspirin (75 mg daily) and progestogens (Cyclogest 400 mg twice daily per vaginum, and Duphaston 10 mg twice daily orally) for luteal phase support following spontaneous conception. She had no known drug allergies. Serial beta-hCG levels were not measured, as the diagnosis was conclusively made via ultrasound, which is the gold standard in such acute settings.
Initial point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the emergency department revealed significant free fluid in the hepatorenal recess (Morison’s pouch) and the pelvis. Formal transvaginal ultrasonography on presentation demonstrated a viable intrauterine pregnancy with a crown–rump length (CRL) of 2.79 cm, corresponding to a gestational age of approximately 9 weeks and 4 days. Fetal heart rate was 167 bpm. A second, well-formed gestational sac containing a viable embryo (CRL 2.58 cm, fetal heart rate 162 bpm) was identified in the left adnexa, separate from the ovary. Free pelvic and subhepatic fluid with echogenic debris and organized clot were noted, with an estimated total hemoperitoneum volume exceeding 800 mL, consistent with acute hemorrhage. A diagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy with a ruptured left tubal ectopic component was made, and the patient was counseled and taken urgently to the operating theater. Ultrasound findings demonstrating concurrent intrauterine and left tubal ectopic pregnancies with associated hemoperitoneum are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3.

2.1. Diagnosis and Laboratory Findings

The primary diagnosis was heterotopic pregnancy with a viable intrauterine gestation and a ruptured left tubal ectopic pregnancy complicated by acute, massive hemoperitoneum. No drug allergies were recorded.
Laboratory evaluation and transfusion requirements reflected significant blood loss. The patient’s blood group was A positive. Admission hemoglobin was 11.2 g/dL. Postoperative hemoglobin measured on Day 1 was 7.8 g/dL; this subsequently decreased to 6.5 g/dL, prompting blood transfusion. Pretransfusion crossmatching confirmed AHG compatibility. The patient initially received two units of packed red blood cells, with a total of four units transfused over the first two postoperative days. Following transfusion, hemoglobin increased to 8.5 g/dL. Coagulation profile (PT, aPTT) and platelet count remained within normal limits throughout her admission.
Radiologic findings were consistent with the clinical diagnosis. Preoperative transvaginal ultrasonography demonstrated a viable intrauterine pregnancy with a crown–rump length of 2.79 cm and a concurrent viable left adnexal ectopic pregnancy with a crown–rump length of 2.58 cm, accompanied by hemoperitoneum with organized clot. Early postoperative imaging revealed an organized cul-de-sac hematoma measuring 6.4 × 5.6 × 3.1 cm (estimated volume ~52 mL). Interval follow-up ultrasonography on postoperative day 7 demonstrated reduction of the pelvic hematoma to 43 × 27 mm (estimated volume ~16 mL) and confirmed persistence of a single viable intrauterine pregnancy with a crown–rump length of 31 mm, corresponding to a gestational age of approximately 10 weeks and 1 day.
No formal clinical scoring systems (e.g., Shock Index, Early Warning Scores) were documented in the clinical notes, though the patient’s presentation (hypotension, tachycardia) was consistent with Class II hemorrhagic shock according to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) classification.
Laboratory and transfusion findings are summarized in Table 1.

2.2. Treatment/Management

The patient received preoperative resuscitation with two large-bore intravenous cannulas, along with analgesia which included a stat dose of intravenous paracetamol 1000 mg and a 1000 mL bolus of Ringer lactate. Urgent group and screen was performed, and 4 units of cross-matched blood were made available. She underwent urgent laparoscopy under general anesthesia. The procedure was performed with the patient in a dorsal lithotomy position, a Foley catheter in place, and pneumoperitoneum established via an infraumbilical Veress needle to 12–15 mmHg. Accessory 5 mm trocars were placed in both lower quadrants. A uterine manipulator was deliberately avoided, to minimize any risk to the intrauterine pregnancy.
Operative findings included a normal uterus and right adnexa, with a ruptured left fallopian tube in the ampullary region containing expelled embryonic tissue and an estimated 1200 mL of intraperitoneal blood and clots. A laparoscopic left salpingectomy was performed using a combination of bipolar diathermy and ultrasonic energy. Hemostasis was thereby achieved, preserving the left ovary. The specimen was retrieved using an endobag through a 10 mm trocar and sent for histopathology. Meticulous suction-evacuation of blood and clots from the pelvic cavity, paracolic gutters, and subdiaphragmatic space was performed, and a closed-suction drain was placed in the left lower quadrant. Intraoperative laparoscopic findings are illustrated in Figure 4.
Estimated intraoperative blood loss was 1200 mL. No intraoperative transfusion was required. Postoperatively, hemoglobin decreased to 6.5 g/dL, prompting a transfusion of four units of packed red blood cells. This was consistent with a restrictive transfusion strategy triggered by the symptomatic anemia and the significant drop in hemoglobin. After transfusion, hemoglobin rose to 8.5 g/dL. Analgesia (multimodal regimen including IV paracetamol and cautious NSAID use) and intravenous fluids were continued as per standard postoperative care, and all medications and monitoring were documented. Preoperative progesterone supplementation (Cyclogest and Duphaston) was continued postoperatively to support the intrauterine pregnancy. Histopathological examination of the resected tube confirmed products of conception and tubal rupture.

2.3. Follow-Up and Outcome

Early postoperative ultrasonography confirmed a single viable intrauterine pregnancy with regular fetal heart activity and a crown–rump length consistent with 10 weeks of gestation. The initial cul-de-sac hematoma measured 6.4 × 5.6 × 3.1 cm, which reduced to 43 × 27 mm on interval imaging one week later, with minimal residual free fluid. The patient remained hemodynamically stable, her pain improved, and she tolerated oral intake and mobilization. She was discharged on postoperative day 3 in stable condition. The patient continued routine antenatal care and subsequently delivered a healthy, live-born infant at term. The intrauterine pregnancy remained viable on serial follow-up through the first trimester, and the drain was removed on postoperative day 2 after output declined to less than 30 mL/24 h. Serial postoperative ultrasound images confirming ongoing intrauterine pregnancy viability are shown in Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9.

3. Discussion

This case demonstrates successful laparoscopic management of a ruptured tubal ectopic component of a heterotopic pregnancy with preservation of intrauterine gestation and a subsequent live birth at term. Key elements included rapid diagnosis via a combination of POCUS and formal transvaginal ultrasound, urgent surgical intervention, thorough evacuation of hemoperitoneum, and transfusion support guided by serial hemoglobin monitoring.
The diagnostic challenge in HP is profound. The absence of an ultrasound at the initial emergency visit, when the symptoms were non-specific, highlights a potential diagnostic pitfall. In retrospect, this was a missed opportunity for early diagnosis, as an ultrasound might have identified the heterotopic pregnancy before rupture. In the era of high-resolution transvaginal ultrasound, the sensitivity for detecting a concurrent ectopic pregnancy in the presence of an intrauterine gestation is reported to be 56–93% [9,13]. The recent literature emphasizes the importance of systematic sonographic evaluation. For instance, Cai et al. highlight the diagnostic complexity of atypical ectopic pregnancies, such as intramural cases, which require meticulous scanning even in the presence of an intrauterine gestation [15]. Furthermore, Pape et al. have validated the predictive value of specific ultrasound criteria (like the “sliding sign” and endometrial thickness) in identifying ectopic pregnancies, confirming that a structured approach can improve diagnostic accuracy, particularly in complex presentations like heterotopic pregnancy [16,17]. This underscores the necessity for a systematic scanning protocol in high-risk patients or those with suggestive symptoms. Our patient’s initial presentation with mild pain highlights how non-specific early symptoms can be, delaying diagnosis until rupture occurs. The presence of risk factors like prior pelvic surgery (cesarean section) and, possibly, progestogen supplementation, which can mask pain, may have contributed to this delay [11].
Surgical management is the definitive treatment for ruptured HP. Laparoscopic salpingectomy, as performed here, is the procedure of choice in hemodynamically stable patients, associated with less blood loss, lower analgesic requirements, and shorter hospital stays compared to laparotomy [7,10]. A critical technical point for surgeons is avoidance of a uterine manipulator, to protect the intrauterine pregnancy. This precaution was strictly observed in the present case. The decision for salpingectomy over salpingostomy is supported by the need for definitive hemostasis in a ruptured tube and also by the need to eliminate the risk of persistent trophoblastic disease, which complicates 3–20% of conservatively managed ectopics [8]. In our case, the extensive tubal damage necessitated salpingectomy.
Maternal resuscitation is a critical pillar of management [14]. Our patient’s hemoglobin dropped by approximately 4.7 g/dL, reflecting significant blood loss. The timely transfusion of 4 units of PRBCs aligns with current guidelines for massive obstetric hemorrhage, and was crucial in correcting hypovolemic shock and ensuring adequate uteroplacental perfusion [2,5]. The decision to transfuse post-operatively, rather than intra-operatively, was guided by a restrictive strategy, so that blood was administered only when hemoglobin fell to 6.5 g/dL in the symptomatic patient. The use of a closed-suction drain, although debated, was beneficial in monitoring postoperative bleeding and facilitating hematoma evacuation in this case.
Fetal outcomes following surgical management of HP are encouraging. Large series report ongoing intrauterine pregnancy rates of 66–75% and live birth rates of 50–70% after laparoscopic surgery [3,4,9]. Factors favoring continuation include early gestational age at intervention (<8 weeks), minimal intraoperative uterine manipulation, and avoidance of significant maternal hypotension [6,12]. Our case adds to this evidence, demonstrating a favorable outcome with intervention at approximately 9 weeks’ gestation and culmination in a term live birth.
This case also highlights important considerations for future fertility. While the patient retains her right tube and both ovaries, the loss of one tube may impact future natural conception. However, studies show that subsequent spontaneous intrauterine pregnancy rates after salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy remain around 60% [8]. A successful continuation of the index pregnancy to term would be the optimal outcome, but long-term follow-up regarding future reproductive plans would be beneficial.
Limitations of this report include its consideration of a single case only, the lack of serial beta-hCG measurements (though these were not clinically necessary here), and the fact that the final outcome was obtained through follow-up communication rather than continuous in-house care.

4. Conclusions

This case underscores the critical need to consider heterotopic pregnancy in any pregnant patient presenting with abdominal pain, regardless of conception method. The absence of early ultrasound findings can delay diagnosis, and reliance on initial symptom attribution may lead to a missed opportunity for intervention prior to rupture. Favorable outcomes are achievable through prompt laparoscopic intervention, a meticulous surgical technique that avoids uterine manipulation, along with continued postoperative support including progesterone supplementation and a judicious transfusion strategy. This case adds to the existing literature by providing a complete clinical picture, from a spontaneous conception and a near-miss diagnostic delay to a successful term live birth.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval was not required for this case report, in accordance with institutional policy and national regulations, as it involved retrospective analysis of anonymized data from a standard clinical procedure.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the nursing and surgical staff involved in the care of this patient. We also thank the patient for giving consent to share this case for educational purposes.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ibrahim, A.G.; Badawi, F.; Tahlak, M. Heterotopic pregnancy: A growing diagnostic challenge. BMJ Case Rep. 2009, 2009, bcr08.2008.0779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kumar, R.; Dey, M. Spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy with tubal rupture and pregnancy progressing to term. Med. J. Armed Forces India 2015, 71, S73–S75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central][Green Version]
  3. Ma, W.W.; Zhu, Y.; Shen, Y. Clinical outcomes of patients with heterotopic pregnancy after laparoscopic surgery. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. X 2024, 24, 100342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Soriano, D.; Vicus, D.; Schonman, R.; Mashiach, R.; Shashar-Levkovitz, D.; Schiff, E.; Seidman, D.S.; Goldenberg, M. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic treatment of heterotopic pregnancy: 19 cases. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2010, 17, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Areys, H.M.; Abdi, M.S.; Omer, N.H.; Osman, O.A.; Bore, T.M. Ruptured heterotopic pregnancy with successful term intrauterine pregnancy outcome after natural conception: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2025, 19, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  6. Elsayed, S.; Farah, N.; Anglim, M. Heterotopic Pregnancy: Case Series and Review of Diagnosis and Management. Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023, 2023, 2124191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  7. Balafoutas, D.; Diessner, J.; Kiesel, M.; Woeckel, A.; Joukhadar, R. Laparoscopic Management of a Heterotopic Pregnancy in the Tubal Stump. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2021, 28, 752–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cheng, X.; Tian, X.; Yan, Z.; Jia, M.; Deng, J.; Wang, Y.; Fan, D. Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy for tubal pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oancea, M.; Ciortea, R.; Diculescu, D.; Poienar, A.-A.; Grigore, M.; Lupean, R.-A.; Nicula, R.; Chira, D.; Strilciuc, S.; Mihu, D. Spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy with unaffected intrauterine pregnancy: Systematic review of clinical outcomes. Medicina 2020, 56, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Chen, S.; Zhu, Y.; Xie, M. Comparison of laparoscopic and open approach in the treatment of heterotopic pregnancy following embryo transfer. Front. Surg. 2022, 9, 1006194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Maiti, G.D.; Jose, T.; Gupta, S.; Chatterjee, V. A rare case of spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy with successful pregnancy outcome following laparoscopic management of coexisting ruptured tubal pregnancy in Non-ART set up. Int. J. Reprod. Contracept. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 7, 2515–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gözüküçük, M.; Çetinkaya, Ş.E.; Aydınuraz, B.; Kahraman, K.; Şatıroğlu, M.H. Live twin birth after successful treatment of a ruptured heterotopic pregnancy by laparoscopy. Gynecol. Surg. 2009, 8, 239–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  13. Soares, C.; Maçães, A.; Novais Veiga, M.; Osório, M. Early diagnosis of spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy successfully treated with laparoscopic surgery. BMJ Case Rep. 2020, 13, e239423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 193: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 131, e91–e103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kirk, E.; Bottomley, C.; Bourne, T. Diagnosing ectopic pregnancy and current concepts in the management of pregnancy of unknown location. Hum. Reprod. Update 2014, 20, 250–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cai, P.; Zheng, M.; Wang, Q.; Wen, Y.; Chen, H.; Gong, F.; Lin, G.; Li, X.; Ouyang, Y. Diagnosis and management of heterotopic intramural pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: An eight-case series. Ultraschall Med. 2024, 47, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pape, J.; Bajka, A.; Strutas, D.; Burkhardt, T.; Imesch, P.; Fink, D.; Samartzis, E.P.; Bajka, M. The Predictive Value of Decisive and Soft Ultrasound Criteria for Ectopic Pregnancy Identification in 321 Preoperative Cases. Ultraschall Med. 2023, 44, e47–e61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Transabdominal ultrasound demonstrates two gestational sacs: an intrauterine sac with viable embryo, and a left adnexal ectopic sac. Free fluid is noted, consistent with heterotopic pregnancy and hemoperitoneum.
Figure 1. Transabdominal ultrasound demonstrates two gestational sacs: an intrauterine sac with viable embryo, and a left adnexal ectopic sac. Free fluid is noted, consistent with heterotopic pregnancy and hemoperitoneum.
Reprodmed 07 00014 g001
Figure 2. Color Doppler ultrasound shows fetal cardiac activity with measurable heart rate, confirming viability of intrauterine pregnancy despite concurrent ectopic rupture and pelvic hematoma.
Figure 2. Color Doppler ultrasound shows fetal cardiac activity with measurable heart rate, confirming viability of intrauterine pregnancy despite concurrent ectopic rupture and pelvic hematoma.
Reprodmed 07 00014 g002
Figure 3. Transabdominal ultrasound demonstrating a left adnexal ectopic gestational sac with yolk sac, separate from uterine cavity, consistent with ectopic pregnancy. Surrounding adnexal tissue appears displaced but intact.
Figure 3. Transabdominal ultrasound demonstrating a left adnexal ectopic gestational sac with yolk sac, separate from uterine cavity, consistent with ectopic pregnancy. Surrounding adnexal tissue appears displaced but intact.
Reprodmed 07 00014 g003
Figure 4. Laparoscopic view reveals ruptured left fallopian tube with active bleeding and surrounding clots, consistent with ectopic pregnancy. Surgical instruments are visible controlling hemorrhage during left salpingectomy. It shows ongoing hemostasis following removal of ruptured ectopic tissue from the left fallopian tube. The bright cauterization site indicates surgical control of bleeding with preserved ovarian structures.
Figure 4. Laparoscopic view reveals ruptured left fallopian tube with active bleeding and surrounding clots, consistent with ectopic pregnancy. Surgical instruments are visible controlling hemorrhage during left salpingectomy. It shows ongoing hemostasis following removal of ruptured ectopic tissue from the left fallopian tube. The bright cauterization site indicates surgical control of bleeding with preserved ovarian structures.
Reprodmed 07 00014 g004
Figure 5. Ultrasound image revealing an intrauterine gestational sac containing a yolk sac and a fetal pole, consistent with a viable early intrauterine pregnancy. Normal endometrial cavity with appropriate sac position and echogenic margins.
Figure 5. Ultrasound image revealing an intrauterine gestational sac containing a yolk sac and a fetal pole, consistent with a viable early intrauterine pregnancy. Normal endometrial cavity with appropriate sac position and echogenic margins.
Reprodmed 07 00014 g005
Figure 6. Obstetric ultrasound showing intrauterine gestational sac with fetal pole development, regular margins, and yolk sac visible. Findings confirm early intrauterine pregnancy, sac position central, without signs of rupture or hemorrhage.
Figure 6. Obstetric ultrasound showing intrauterine gestational sac with fetal pole development, regular margins, and yolk sac visible. Findings confirm early intrauterine pregnancy, sac position central, without signs of rupture or hemorrhage.
Reprodmed 07 00014 g006
Figure 7. Longitudinal transvaginal scan demonstrating early intrauterine pregnancy with crown–rump length measurement. Gestational sac well-defined within endometrial cavity, consistent with normal early pregnancy progression without adnexal abnormality.
Figure 7. Longitudinal transvaginal scan demonstrating early intrauterine pregnancy with crown–rump length measurement. Gestational sac well-defined within endometrial cavity, consistent with normal early pregnancy progression without adnexal abnormality.
Reprodmed 07 00014 g007
Figure 8. Color Doppler ultrasound showing intrauterine gestational sac with fetal cardiac activity and spectral waveform analysis confirming regular fetal heart rate, consistent with viable early pregnancy.
Figure 8. Color Doppler ultrasound showing intrauterine gestational sac with fetal cardiac activity and spectral waveform analysis confirming regular fetal heart rate, consistent with viable early pregnancy.
Reprodmed 07 00014 g008
Figure 9. Pelvic ultrasound demonstrating gravid uterus with intrauterine gestation. No adnexal masses seen in this image, but evaluation performed due to known heterotopic pregnancy and prior laparoscopic salpingectomy.
Figure 9. Pelvic ultrasound demonstrating gravid uterus with intrauterine gestation. No adnexal masses seen in this image, but evaluation performed due to known heterotopic pregnancy and prior laparoscopic salpingectomy.
Reprodmed 07 00014 g009
Table 1. Summary of Key Laboratory, Transfusion, and Radiologic Parameters.
Table 1. Summary of Key Laboratory, Transfusion, and Radiologic Parameters.
ParameterResultTiming/Notes
Blood GroupA positive (A+)Documented at presentation
Admission Hb11.2 g/dLBaseline on presentation (Day 0)
Hb (first post-op)7.8 g/dLPost-operative assessment (Day 1)
Hb (lowest)6.5 g/dLRepeat sample triggering transfusion (Day 1)
CrossmatchAHG compatiblePretransfusion crossmatch
PRBC Transfused4 units totalTransfused over post-operative days 1–2
Hb (post-transfusion)8.5 g/dLMeasured on Day 2 after 4 units
Coagulation ProfilePT 12.1 s, aPTT 28 s, Plt 210 × 103/µLRemained normal post-op
Estimated Blood Loss~1200 mL (intraoperative)As documented in operative note
Radiology (pre-op)Viable IU gestation (CRL 2.79 cm); viable left adnexal ectopic (CRL 2.58 cm); massive hemoperitoneumOn presentation, diagnosis confirmed
Radiology (early post-op)Cul-de-sac hematoma 6.4 × 5.6 × 3.1 cm (~52 mL)First post-op imaging (Day 1)
Radiology (interval)Pelvic hematoma 43 × 27 mm (~16 mL); viable IU pregnancy CRL 31 mm (GA ~10w1d)Follow-up imaging (Day 7)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khayat, S. Ruptured Heterotopic Pregnancy: Laparoscopic Management, Preserving Intrauterine Viability. Reprod. Med. 2026, 7, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed7010014

AMA Style

Khayat S. Ruptured Heterotopic Pregnancy: Laparoscopic Management, Preserving Intrauterine Viability. Reproductive Medicine. 2026; 7(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed7010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khayat, Suhaib. 2026. "Ruptured Heterotopic Pregnancy: Laparoscopic Management, Preserving Intrauterine Viability" Reproductive Medicine 7, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed7010014

APA Style

Khayat, S. (2026). Ruptured Heterotopic Pregnancy: Laparoscopic Management, Preserving Intrauterine Viability. Reproductive Medicine, 7(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed7010014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop