Next Article in Journal
Morphological Characteristics of Catalyst Layer Defects in Catalyst-Coated Membranes in PEM Fuel Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Alkaloids of Solanum xanthocarpum Stem as Green Inhibitor for Mild Steel Corrosion in One Molar Sulphuric Acid Solution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

NiFeOx and NiFeCoOx Catalysts for Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electrochem 2022, 3(4), 843-861; https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem3040055
Submission received: 2 October 2022 / Revised: 8 November 2022 / Accepted: 6 December 2022 / Published: 14 December 2022

Abstract

Hydrogen production using an Anion exchange membrane (AEM) electrolyzer allows the use of non-platinum group metal catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Nickel and Cobalt-based oxides are active in an alkaline environment for OER and are relatively inexpensive compared to IrO2 catalysts used in Polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) electrolysis. Mixed metal oxide catalysts NiFeOx and NiFeCoOx catalysts were synthesized by the coprecipitation method using NaOH. X-ray diffraction results showed mainly NiO diffraction peaks for the NiFeOx catalyst due to the low concentration of Fe, for the NiFeCoOx catalyst, NiCo2O4 diffraction peaks were observed. NiFeCoOx catalysts showed a higher Anion exchange membrane water electrolysis (AEMWE) performance compared to NiFeOx and commercial NiO, the highest current density at 2 V was 802 mA cm−2 at 70 °C using 1 M KOH as an electrolyte. The effect of electrolyte concentration was studied by using 0.01 M, 0.1 M and 1 M KOH concentrations in an electrolysis operation. Electrochemical Impedance spectroscopy was performed along with the equivalent circuit fitting to calculate ohmic and activation resistances, the results showed a decrease in ohmic and activation resistances with the increase in electrolyte concentration. Commercially available AEM (Fumasep FAA-3-50 and Sustainion dioxide membrane X-37-50 grade T) were tested at similar conditions and their performance was compared. EIS results showed that X-37-50 offered lower ohmic resistance than the FAA-3-50 membrane.
Keywords: AEM; OER; PEM; NiO; NiFeOx; NiFeCoOx; EIS; ohmic resistance AEM; OER; PEM; NiO; NiFeOx; NiFeCoOx; EIS; ohmic resistance

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmed, K.W.; Jang, M.J.; Habibpour, S.; Chen, Z.; Fowler, M. NiFeOx and NiFeCoOx Catalysts for Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis. Electrochem 2022, 3, 843-861. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem3040055

AMA Style

Ahmed KW, Jang MJ, Habibpour S, Chen Z, Fowler M. NiFeOx and NiFeCoOx Catalysts for Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis. Electrochem. 2022; 3(4):843-861. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem3040055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmed, Khaja Wahab, Myeong Je Jang, Saeed Habibpour, Zhongwei Chen, and Michael Fowler. 2022. "NiFeOx and NiFeCoOx Catalysts for Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis" Electrochem 3, no. 4: 843-861. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem3040055

APA Style

Ahmed, K. W., Jang, M. J., Habibpour, S., Chen, Z., & Fowler, M. (2022). NiFeOx and NiFeCoOx Catalysts for Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis. Electrochem, 3(4), 843-861. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem3040055

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop