# Numerical Analysis of the Main Wave Propagation Characteristics in a Steel-CFRP Laminate Including Model Order Reduction

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Analytical Dispersion Relation in Fiber Metal Laminates

#### 2.1. Dispersion Relation of a Single Layer

**b**are the volume forces,

**u**represents the displacement field, and the dots indicate the second derivative with respect to the time. Furthermore, to derive the equation of motion, linear strains are considered

#### 2.2. Wave Propagation in Layered Structures

#### 2.3. Displacement Fields

## 3. Material and Model Definition

#### 3.1. Material Layout

#### 3.2. Model Definition

## 4. Analysis of the Dispersion Diagram

#### 4.1. Analytical Treatment

#### 4.2. Numerical Simulations

^{®}. The two-dimensional numerical model and the corresponding boundary conditions used are depicted in Figure 2. The total length of the model is 1 $\mathrm{m}$ and the discretization is realized by second-order Lagrangian elements under plane strain assumption. Subsequently, a structured mesh of rectangular elements with quadratic shape functions is generated. For the excitation of the wave field, a multifrequency signal is used, see Ref. [31]. It is tuned to be able to generate dispersion diagrams over a predefined frequency range and hence, to avoid multiple simulations. The same signal is used for both directions, covering a frequency range from 25 $\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{Hz}$ to 245 $\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{Hz}$ in the steps of 10 $\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{Hz}$. The signal is applied by a force boundary condition at a distance of 4 $\mathrm{m}$$\mathrm{m}$ from the left edge at the upper surface of the plate. Subsequently, both fundamental ${A}_{0}$- and ${S}_{0}$-modes are excited. A mode-selective excitation is not necessary, because the evaluation is done at the center line of the plate. Due to the theoretical displacement field characteristics, the ${S}_{0}$-mode shows only an in-plane displacement component at the center line, whereas the ${A}_{0}$-mode is limited to an out-of-plane motion. Therefore, with the help of the displacement component ${u}_{1}$ the ${S}_{0}$-mode and with the help of the component ${u}_{3}$, the ${A}_{0}$-mode can be evaluated separately. Details about the model size and the discretization are provided in Table 2.

#### 4.3. Results and Comparison

## 5. Displacement Field Analysis

#### 5.1. Analytical Treatment

#### 5.2. Numerical Simulations

#### 5.3. Results and Comparison

## 6. Parametric Model Order Reduction of Numerical Model

#### 6.1. Fundamentals

#### 6.2. Application

## 7. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## Abbreviations

2D | two dimensional |

2D-DFT | discrete two dimensional Fourier transformation |

3D | three dimensional |

CFRP | carbon fiber-reinforced plastic |

FML | fiber metal laminate |

FRP | fiber-reinforced polymer |

GFRP | glass fiber-reinforced plastic |

GUW | guided ultrasonic wave |

HiFi | high fidelity |

MOR | model order reduction |

PMOR | parametric model order reduction |

POD | proper orthogonal decomposition |

POM | proper orthogonal modes |

SHM | structural health monitoring |

SVD | singular value decomposition |

UD | unidirectional |

## Appendix A

**Figure A1.**In-plane (

**left**) and out-of-plane (

**right**) components of a normalized displacement field for ${A}_{0}$ wave mode perpendicular to the fiber orientation at 80 $\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{Hz}$ derived from the analytical framework and numerical 2D- and 3D-simulations.

**Figure A2.**In-plane (

**left**) and out-of-plane (

**right**) components of a normalized displacement field for ${S}_{0}$ (

**top**) and ${A}_{0}$ (

**bottom**) wave modes in the fiber orientation at 80 $\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{Hz}$ derived from the analytical framework and numerical 2D- and 3D-simulations.

${\mathit{A}}_{0}$ | ${\mathit{A}}_{0}$ | ${\mathit{S}}_{0}$ | ${\mathit{S}}_{0}$ | |
---|---|---|---|---|

in-Plane | Out-of-Plane | in-Plane | Out-of-Plane | |

In fiber direction | $2.01\%$ | $0.01\%$ | $0.007\%$ | $0.035\%$ |

Perpendicular | $1.02\%$ | $0.006\%$ | $0.023\%$ | $0.092\%$ |

${\mathit{A}}_{0}$ | ${\mathit{A}}_{0}$ | ${\mathit{S}}_{0}$ | ${\mathit{S}}_{0}$ | |
---|---|---|---|---|

in-Plane | Out-of-Plane | in-Plane | Out-of-Plane | |

In fiber direction | $0.33\%$ | $0.004\%$ | $0.008\%$ | $0.055\%$ |

Perpendicular | $1.06\%$ | $0.006\%$ | $0.036\%$ | $0.19\%$ |

## References

- Alderliesten, R.C.; Hagenbeek, M.; Homan, J.J.; Hooijmeijer, P.A.; de Vries, T.J.; Vermeeren, C.A.J.R. Fatigue and Damage Tolerance of Glare. Appl. Compos. Mater.
**2003**, 10, 223–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vlot, A.; Gunnink, J.W. (Eds.) Fibre Metal Laminates: An Introduction; Springer eBook Collection; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chai, G.B.; Manikandan, P. Low velocity impact response of fibre-metal laminates—A review. Compos. Struct.
**2014**, 107, 363–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Morinière, F.; Alderliesten, R.; Tooski, M.; Benedictus, R. Damage evolution in GLARE fibre-metal laminate under repeated low-velocity impact tests. Open Eng.
**2012**, 2, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Giurgiutiu, V. Structural Health Monitoring with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Lammering, R.; Gabbert, U.; Sinapius, M.; Schuster, T.; Wierach, P. (Eds.) Lamb-Wave Based Structural Health Monitoring in Polymer Composites; Research Topics in Aerospace; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamb, H. On waves in an elastic plate. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. A Contain. Pap. A Math. Phys. Character
**1917**, 93, 114–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Viktorov, I.A. Rayleigh and Lamb Waves: Physical Theory and Applications; Ultrasonic technology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Achenbach, J.D. Wave Propagation in Elastic Solids; North-Holland Series in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics; North-Holland Publishing Co.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1973; Volume 16. [Google Scholar]
- Graff, K.F. Wave Motion in Elastic Solids; Dover Publications: New York, NY, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Rose, J.L. Ultrasonic Guided Waves in Solid Media; Cambridge Univercity Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Nayfeh, A.H. The general problem of elastic wave propagation in multilayered anisotropic media. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
**1991**, 89, 1521–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nayfeh, A.H. Wave Propagation in Layered Anisotropic Media: With Applications to Composites; North-Holland series in applied mathematics and mechanics; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 1995; Volume 39. [Google Scholar]
- Rokhlin, S.I.; Wang, L. Ultrasonic waves in layered anisotropic media: Characterization of multidirectional composites. Int. J. Solids Struct.
**2002**, 39, 4133–4149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, L.; Rokhlin, S.I. Ultrasonic wave interaction with multidirectional composites: Modeling and experiment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
**2003**, 114, 2582–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Nandyala, A.R.; Darpe, A.K.; Singh, S.P. Effective stiffness matrix method for predicting the dispersion curves in general anisotropic composites. Arch. Appl. Mech.
**2019**, 89, 1923–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ngoc Nguyen, V. Zur Wellenausbreitung in Geschichteten Faserverbundstrukturen Unter Verwendung Nichtlinearer Stoffgesetze. Ph.D. Dissertation, Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Hosseini, S.M.H.; Kharaghani, A.; Kirsch, C.; Gabbert, U. Numerical simulation of Lamb wave propagation in metallic foam sandwich structures: A parametric study. Compos. Struct.
**2013**, 97, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Thwaites, S.; Clark, N.H. Non-destructive Testing of Honeycomb Sandwich Structures Using Elastic Waves. J. Sound Vib.
**1995**, 187, 253–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Song, F.; Huang, G.L.; Hu, G.K. Online Guided Wave-Based Debonding Detection in Honeycomb Sandwich Structures. AIAA J.
**2012**, 50, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Bertoni, H.L.; Park, S.K. Propagation of elastic waves in honeycomb panels for application to rapid inspection techniques. J. Nondestruct. Eval.
**1981**, 2, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lowe, M.J.S.; Cawley, P. The applicability of plate wave techniques for the inspection of adhesive and diffusion bonded joints. J. Nondestruct. Eval.
**1994**, 13, 185–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Guo, N.; Lim, M.K. Lamb Waves Propagation in Aluminum Honeycomb Structures. In Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation; Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1996; pp. 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Fujita, T.; Toda, K. Operational Performance of A 0 -mode Lamb Wave Interdigital Transducers Under Water-Loaded Condition. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
**2004**, 43, 5577–5581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Maghsoodi, A.; Ohadi, A.; Sadighi, M.; Amindavar, H. Damage detection in multilayered fiber–metal laminates using guided-wave phased array. J. Mech. Sci. Technol.
**2016**, 30, 2113–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gao, J.; Lyu, Y.; Zheng, M.; Liu, M.; Liu, H.; Wu, B.; He, C. Modeling guided wave propagation in multi-layered anisotropic composite laminates by state-vector formalism and the Legendre polynomials. Compos. Struct.
**2019**, 228, 111319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tai, S.; Kotobuki, F.; Wang, L.; Mal, A. Modeling Ultrasonic Elastic Waves in Fiber-Metal Laminate Structures in Presence of Sources and Defects. J. Nondestruct. Eval. Diagn. Progn. Eng. Syst.
**2020**, 3, 041102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Muc, A.; Barski, M.; Stawiarski, A.; Chwał, M.; Augustyn, M. Dispersion curves and identification of elastic wave modes for fiber metal laminates. Compos. Struct.
**2021**, 255, 112930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, L. Elastic Wave Propagation in Composites and Least-Squares Damage Localization Technique. Master’s Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Barth, T.; Lammering, R. Experimental Approach on Lamb Wave Dispersion Diagrams Using 2D Fourier Transformation and Laser Vibrometry. PAMM
**2021**, 21, e202100060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Barth, T.; Rauter, N.; Lammering, R. Experimental Determination of Lamb Wave Dispersion Diagrams Using 2D Fourier Transform and Laser Vibrometry. Preprint
**2022**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bracewell, R.N.; Bracewell, R.N. The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill series in electrical and computer engineering; McGraw Hill: Boston, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Alleyne, D.; Cawley, P. A two-dimensional Fourier transform method for the measurement of propagating multimode signals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
**1991**, 89, 1159–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Su, Z.; Ye, L. Identification of Damage Using Lamb Waves: From Fundamentals to Applications; Springer: London, UK, 2009; Volume 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hora, P.; Červená, O. Determination of Lamb wave dispersion curves by means of Fourier transform. Appl. Comput. Mech.
**2012**, 6, 5–16. [Google Scholar] - Antoulas, A.C. Approximation of Large-Scale Dynamical Systems; Advances in design and control; SIAM Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2005; Volume 6. [Google Scholar]
- Pearson, K. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. London Edinburgh Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci.
**1901**, 2, 559–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Ahlman, D.; Söderlund, F.; Jackson, J.; Kurdila, A.; Shyy, W. Proper Orthogonal Decomposition for Time-Dependent Lid-Driven Cavity Flows. Numer. Heat Transf. Part B Fundam.
**2002**, 42, 285–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Berkooz, G.; Holmes, P.; Lumley, J.L. The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
**1993**, 25, 539–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Holmes, P.; Lumley, J.L.; Berkooz, G.; Rowley, C.W. Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ly, H.V.; Tran, H.T. Modeling and control of physical processes using proper orthogonal decomposition. Math. Comput. Model.
**2001**, 33, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Kirby, M.; Sirovich, L. Application of the Karhunen-Loeve procedure for the characterization of human faces. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.
**1990**, 12, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Han, S.; Palazotto, A.N.; Leakeas, C.L. Finite-Element Analysis of Lamb Wave Propagation in a Thin Aluminum Plate. J. Aerosp. Eng.
**2009**, 22, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bellam Muralidhar, N.K.; Rauter, N.; Mikhaylenko, A.; Lammering, R.; Lorenz, D.A. Parametric Model Order Reduction of Guided Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in Fiber Metal Laminates with Damage. Modelling
**2021**, 2, 591–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cagniart, N.; Crisovan, R.; Maday, Y.; Abgrall, R. Model Order Reduction for Hyperbolic Problems: A New Framework. HAL
**2017**, hal-01583224. [Google Scholar] - Mirhoseini, M.A.; Zahr, M.J. Model reduction of convection-dominated partial differential equations via optimization-based implicit feature tracking. arXiv
**2021**, arXiv:2109.14694. [Google Scholar] - Boncoraglio, G.; Farhat, C. Active Manifold and Model-Order Reduction to Accelerate Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. AIAA J.
**2021**, 59, 4739–4753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bui-Thanh, T.; Willcox, K.; Ghattas, O. Model Reduction for Large-Scale Systems with High-Dimensional Parametric Input Space. SIAM J. Sci. Comput.
**2008**, 30, 3270–3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Phuong Huynh, D.B.; Knezevic, D.J.; Patera, A.T. A Static condensation Reduced Basis Element method: Approximation and a posteriori error estimation. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal.
**2013**, 47, 213–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Eftang, J.L.; Patera, A.T. Port reduction in parametrized component static condensation: Approximation and a posteriori error estimation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
**2013**, 96, 269–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - McBane, S.; Choi, Y. Component-wise reduced order model lattice-type structure design. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
**2021**, 381, 113813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kim, Y.; Wang, K.; Choi, Y. Efficient Space–Time Reduced Order Model for Linear Dynamical Systems in Python Using Less than 120 Lines of Code. Mathematics
**2021**, 9, 1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Blockmans, B.; Tamarozzi, T.; Naets, F.; Desmet, W. A nonlinear parametric model reduction method for efficient gear contact simulations. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
**2015**, 102, 1162–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Balajewicz, M.; Farhat, C. Reduction of nonlinear embedded boundary models for problems with evolving interfaces. J. Comput. Phys.
**2014**, 274, 489–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Galbally, D.; Fidkowski, K.; Willcox, K.; Ghattas, O. Non-linear model reduction for uncertainty quantification in large-scale inverse problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
**2010**, 81, 1581–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Chen, P.; Schwab, C. Model Order Reduction Methods in Computational Uncertainty Quantification. In Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification; Ghanem, R., Higdon, D., Owhadi, H., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 1–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balajewicz, M.; Amsallem, D.; Farhat, C. Projection–based model reduction for contact problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
**2016**, 106, 644–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Zahr, M.J.; Avery, P.; Farhat, C. A multilevel projection-based model order reduction framework for nonlinear dynamic multiscale problems in structural and solid mechanics. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
**2017**, 112, 855–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 2.**Numerical model for the computation of the dispersion diagrams including the boundary conditions.

**Figure 3.**Comparison of numerically and analytically determined dispersion diagrams in fiber direction (

**left**) and perpendicular (

**right**) to the fiber orientation.

**Figure 4.**Deviation of the numerically and analytically determined dispersion diagrams in fiber direction (

**left**) and perpendicular (

**right**) to the fiber orientation.

**Figure 5.**Numerical 2D model for the computation of the displacement fields including the boundary conditions.

**Figure 6.**Numerical 3D model for the computation of displacement fields including the boundary conditions.

**Figure 7.**In-plane (

**left**) and out-of-plane (

**right**) components of normalized displacement field for ${S}_{0}$ (

**top**) and ${A}_{0}$ (

**bottom**) wave modes in the fiber orientation at 120 $\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{Hz}$ from analytical treatment and numerical 2D- and 3D-simulations.

**Figure 8.**In-plane (

**left**) and out-of-plane (

**right**) components of normalized displacement field for ${S}_{0}$ (

**top**) and ${A}_{0}$ (

**bottom**) wave modes perpendicular to the fiber orientation at 120 $\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{Hz}$ from analytical treatment and numerical 2D- and 3D-simulations.

**Figure 9.**In-plane

**(left**) and out-of-plane (

**right**) components of normalized displacement field for ${S}_{0}$ wave modes perpendicular to the fiber orientation at 80 $\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{Hz}$ from analytical treatment and numerical 2D- and 3D-simulations.

${\mathit{E}}_{11}$ | ${\mathit{E}}_{22}$ | ${\mathit{G}}_{12}$ | ${\mathit{\nu}}_{12}$ | ${\mathit{\nu}}_{23}$ | $\mathit{\rho}$ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

[GPa] | [GPa] | [GPa] | [-] | [-] | [kg/m^{3}] | |

Steel | 180 | 180 | 69.2 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 7900 |

CFRP | 127 | 9.24 | 4.83 | 0.30 | 0.37 | 1580 |

Parameter | Value | Unit |
---|---|---|

Thickness | 1.98 | $\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}$ |

Length | 1000 | $\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}$ |

Element size CFRP | $0.2\times 0.25$ | $\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^{2}$ |

Element size steel | $0.2\times 0.12$ | $\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^{2}$ |

Nodes per element | 9 | - |

Propagation length | 1000 | $\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}$ |

Simulation time | 10 | $\mathrm{m}\mathrm{s}$ |

Sampling frequency | 6 | $\mathrm{MHz}$ |

Min. excitation frequency | 25 | $\mathrm{kHz}$ |

Max. excitation frequency | 245 | $\mathrm{kHz}$ |

**Table 3.**Parameters of the numerical models and simulations for the computation of displacement fields.

Parameter | Value | Unit | |
---|---|---|---|

Thickness | 1.98 | $\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}$ | |

Length | 0.3 | $\mathrm{m}$ | |

2D model | Element size CFRP | $0.75\times 0.25$ | $\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^{2}$ |

Element size steel | $0.75\times 0.12$ | $\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^{2}$ | |

Nodes per element | 9 | - | |

Thickness | 1.98 | $\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}$ | |

Length | 0.3 | $\mathrm{m}$ | |

3D model | Width | 0.15 | $\mathrm{m}$ |

Element size CFRP | $0.75\times 0.75\times 0.25$ | $\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^{3}$ | |

Element size steel | $0.75\times 0.75\times 0.12$ | $\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^{3}$ | |

Nodes per element | 27 | - | |

Excitation frequency | 80 | $\mathrm{k}\mathrm{Hz}$ | |

Analysis at 80 $\mathrm{kHz}$ | Sampling frequency | 1.6 | $\mathrm{MHz}$ |

Simulation time | 0.3 | $\mathrm{m}\mathrm{s}$ | |

Excitation frequency | 120 | $\mathrm{kHz}$ | |

Analysis at 120 $\mathrm{kHz}$ | Sampling frequency | 2.4 | $\mathrm{MHz}$ |

Simulation time | 0.21 | $\mathrm{m}\mathrm{s}$ |

${\mathit{A}}_{0}$ | ${\mathit{A}}_{0}$ | ${\mathit{S}}_{0}$ | ${\mathit{S}}_{0}$ | |
---|---|---|---|---|

in-Plane | Out-of-Plane | in-Plane | Out-of-Plane | |

In fiber direction | $0.072\%$ | $0.019\%$ | $0.042\%$ | $0.22\%$ |

Perpendicular | $0.57\%$ | $0.016\%$ | $0.06\%$ | $0.28\%$ |

${\mathit{A}}_{0}$ | ${\mathit{A}}_{0}$ | ${\mathit{S}}_{0}$ | ${\mathit{S}}_{0}$ | |
---|---|---|---|---|

in-Plane | Out-of-Plane | in-Plane | Out-of-Plane | |

In fiber direction | $0.22\%$ | $0.055\%$ | $0.054\%$ | $1.53\%$ |

Perpendicular | $1.02\%$ | $0.01\%$ | $0.074\%$ | $0.31\%$ |

Model | Training Time | Computational Time |
---|---|---|

High-dimensional | - | 66.29 s |

Reduced-order | 17.6 h | 1.45 s |

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Mikhaylenko, A.; Rauter, N.; Bellam Muralidhar, N.K.; Barth, T.; Lorenz, D.A.; Lammering, R.
Numerical Analysis of the Main Wave Propagation Characteristics in a Steel-CFRP Laminate Including Model Order Reduction. *Acoustics* **2022**, *4*, 517-537.
https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics4030032

**AMA Style**

Mikhaylenko A, Rauter N, Bellam Muralidhar NK, Barth T, Lorenz DA, Lammering R.
Numerical Analysis of the Main Wave Propagation Characteristics in a Steel-CFRP Laminate Including Model Order Reduction. *Acoustics*. 2022; 4(3):517-537.
https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics4030032

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Mikhaylenko, Andrey, Natalie Rauter, Nanda Kishore Bellam Muralidhar, Tilmann Barth, Dirk A. Lorenz, and Rolf Lammering.
2022. "Numerical Analysis of the Main Wave Propagation Characteristics in a Steel-CFRP Laminate Including Model Order Reduction" *Acoustics* 4, no. 3: 517-537.
https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics4030032