Next Article in Journal
History of Non-Fatal Physical Assault Is Associated with Premature Mortality for Whites but Not Blacks
Next Article in Special Issue
Receptor Regulation in Taste: Can Diet Influence How We Perceive Foods?
Previous Article in Journal
Pathway Analysis of a Transcriptome and Metabolite Profile to Elucidate a Compensatory Mechanism for Taurine Deficiency in the Heart of Taurine Transporter Knockout Mice
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Gamification Concepts to Promote and Maintain Therapy Adherence in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency †

Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
Pediatric Endocrinology Unit, Soroka Medical Center & Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva 85025, Israel
Kind-Visie, 3571 VA Utrecht, The Netherlands
StoryConnect, 6708 PW Wageningen, The Netherlands
Ferring Pharmaceuticals, 1162 Saint Prex, Switzerland
Moray College, University of the Highlands and Islands, Elgin IV30 1JJ, UK
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Short Title: Gamification Concepts in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency.
J 2018, 1(1), 71-80;
Received: 25 July 2018 / Revised: 23 August 2018 / Accepted: 25 August 2018 / Published: 31 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers for J-Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal)


Growth hormone (GH) deficiency affects up to one in 4000 children and is usually treated with daily injections of GH whilst the child is still growing. With children typically diagnosed at around five years old, this can mean over 10 years of therapy, which can place a considerable burden on the child and the parent. Over three-quarters of children are estimated to be not fully compliant with therapy, which can compromise their chances of attaining their target height. In recent years, interactive mobile health (smart phone or tablet) interventions using game-like concepts, so called ‘gamification’, have increased in popularity and have demonstrated success in promoting positive self-management behaviour in children with chronic conditions, such as diabetes. The application of gamified interventions has the potential to support adherence to therapy and positive behaviour in children with GH deficiency in a number of ways: (1) By providing education in a format that the child understands and accepts (e.g., using behavioural constructs to facilitate explaining why adherence is important); (2) By providing a mechanism to reduce the anxiety and stress associated with administering the injection (e.g., diversion with a virtual pet); and (3) By providing feedback to encourage ongoing engagement (e.g., rewards, progression through levels).

1. Introduction

Growth hormone (GH; also known as somatotropin) deficiency affects approximately 1 in 4000 to 1 in 10,000 children, and typically becomes evident at around 5 years old [1,2]. A child diagnosed at this age may require daily injections of GH for over 10 years, which can place a considerable burden on both the child and parent, and may result in suboptimal treatment compliance [3]. It has been estimated that up to 82% of paediatric patients are not fully compliant, with missing more than one GH dose per week being shown to significantly compromise linear growth (p < 0.01), reducing the chances of attaining normal or near-normal adult height [3,4,5]. Patients who are receiving GH therapy are typically monitored around 2–4 times per year for growth progress, and to adjust GH dosage [6]. In order for patients to receive the full benefit of GH therapy, there is a need for convenient and feasible innovations to facilitate the monitoring and maintenance of compliance and adherence.
Play can be a useful tool for helping children to process their diagnosis, illness, and treatment [7]. Such exercises and games have been shown to help reduce children’s distress and anxiety in preparation for medical procedures [8]. As children increasingly turn to mobile gaming for entertainment (a reported 86% of 6–10-year olds regularly play video games) [9], researchers are investigating whether it is possible to harness this medium to engage with patients [10]. In recent years, interactive mobile health (mHealth) interventions have emerged as a strategy to tackle the challenges that young patients face in coping with chronic conditions [11]. mHealth interventions are mobile-based (smartphone or tablet) applications that are designed to educate, train, and provide treatment support for patients outside of the clinic. The term ‘gamification’ refers to the application of game-like concepts or elements, (e.g., quests and goals, achievements and badges, leader boards (competition), points, levels, virtual goods and rewards, and in-game friends and teams (collaboration and social scaffolding), etc.) in non-game contexts [12,13]. There is growing evidence to suggest that the application of ‘gamification’ concepts can influence and promote positive, and lasting behavioural change in various health conditions and age groups (including children) through the design of digital games that carefully target patient needs [12,14,15]. The aim of this paper is to explore how gamification concepts and mHealth strategies could be combined to address the challenge of adherence in children receiving GH therapy to support and improve outcomes.

2. Overview of Gamification Strategies for Health

Gamification in health offers a creative and innovative approach to tackling adherence in children with chronic conditions such as GH deficiency. Serious games are being increasingly offered as mobile apps that can be used to entertain players while educating and training them (‘edutainment’) to promote positive behaviour [12,16]. The application of game mechanics (play actions and the associated parameters and rules) in health can help to turn serious routine responsibilities e.g., administration of daily injections, into a fun, engaging activity by leveraging gaming dynamics (gameplay sequences, behaviours and complexity, the products of game mechanics), behavioural constructs, and incentives to support self-management [17,18]. There are a number of integral pathways of influence and feedback that need to be considered to ensure the development of successful gamification strategies for positive behavioural change, including the impact of game elements, mechanics, and dynamics on both neuro-chemical and psychological pathways (Figure 1).
Game mechanics and the resulting game dynamics aim to provide the user with challenges, rewards, fun engagement, and socialisation through use of game elements, such as points, leader boards, badges, levels, and coaches in the form of avatars (e.g., a virtual-self or a pet) [12,19]. The persuasive architecture of gamification relies on the combination of ingredients that make a task fun and engaging [19]. It has been proposed that there are seven core ingredients for gamification that can be utilised to inspire behavioural change: Goal setting, challenges, feedback, reinforcement, monitoring/comparing progress, social connectivity, and fun/playfulness [19].
There is growing scientific evidence to suggest that gamification strategies can directly influence neurochemical networks in the brain through activation of the ‘reward circuitry’ and dopaminergic pathways [20,21,22]. Studies show that incentives and rewards can promote educational learning and positive behavioural change through direct activation of neural mechanisms of reinforcement [21,22]. Using methods including structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), rewards have been shown to produce direct changes in the brain, resulting in enhanced performance in demanding cognitive tasks such as working memory [22]. Education in a game-based environment has also been associated with deactivation of default mode network (DMN) regions, thus promoting a deeper level of learning [23].
In addition to the direct neurological effects of gamification, consideration must be given to psychological pathways. Motivation is one of the most crucial psychological drivers of all human behaviour [24]. There are two types of motivation that are critical for sustained behavioural change: intrinsic motivation (the internal desire to do an activity e.g., out of enjoyment) and extrinsic motivation (dependent on a reward received whenever an activity is completed) [24]. The use of extrinsic motivation in mHealth interventions can serve to establish a new behaviour, but when used alone, it can become meaningless over time, resulting in a loss of motivation [25]. The Octalysis framework organises motivating factors into eight core drives of gamification: meaning, empowerment, social influence, unpredictability, avoidance, scarcity, ownership, and accomplishment [26]. It is proposed that games must appeal to one or more of these motivational drivers in order to keep users engaged with an app over time [26]. In order to ensure sustainable behavioural change without relapse, gamification must go beyond simple achievements and points. Patients must be able to self-identify with goals that are meaningful to them, as this will help the patient to accept the intrinsic value of the task, resulting in more autonomous, internalised behaviours [25].
In order to successfully effect the desired long-lasting health and behaviour changing outcomes, all of the involved human, personal, and psychological factors of the target population must be considered (e.g., age group, demographics, health literacy, clinical status), as this will not only affect how users will engage with the game, but also how they are persuaded via the game elements to positively change their behaviour without relapse. Another important ingredient is ‘iterative development’, which involves working with key stakeholders (i.e., children, parents, and healthcare professionals), including a good representative sample of end users (i.e., children with chronic illnesses), to test and refine the features of the game repeatedly early in the process, to help avoid late-stage failure [27]. Improved understanding of the feedback between the integral pathways of influence helps to inform the development of games to ensure an effective and relevant experience for the end user.

3. How Could Gamification Contribute to Improved Adherence to GH Therapy?

Non-adherence to GH therapy can arise from a multitude of inter-related psychological, socio-economic, and technical issues [3]. Children and parents’ beliefs about GH therapy, as well as their relationship with healthcare professionals, are critical for the maintenance of adherence [28]. Negative beliefs about medicines have been associated with more negative illness perceptions in patients with long-term conditions, which can affect patient quality of life and self-management behaviour, including adherence to medication [29]. Unlike other chronic conditions, such as diabetes, non-adherence to GH therapy may not have immediate acute consequences, and therefore may go unnoticed for a longer period of time. It is therefore crucial that both parents and children are made aware of the potential consequences that are associated with missed doses when initiating GH therapy, both clinical (e.g., reduced height velocity), and economic (e.g., wasted medicine) [3]. Changing patients’ attitudes regarding the implications of missed doses (via effective in-game education) is the first step toward positively changing their behaviour without relapse, resulting in perfect compliance and continued adherence.
Expectations and beliefs about GH therapy need to be agreed upfront to ensure that patients set realistic goals. Education through mobile games could help to reinforce patient understanding about GH deficiency, and coach patients about the benefits of continuing with therapy, especially in young children who often rely on play-based learning to make sense of the world around them. Patients can also feel a sense of disappointment due to unrealistic expectations and goals [28]. A smartphone app could help patients to track their growth, charting their progress toward realistic goals set by physicians. As injections must be delivered daily, it can also be difficult for parents to find an appropriate time to schedule injections that fits into both the parent and child’s routine [3]. Use of a mobile app may help to establish daily injections as part of the child’s bedtime routine and provide prompts when doses are missed.
Serious games can help patients to establish important self-management behaviours in a fun and positive environment. Monster Manor (Ayogo; The Sanofi Group) is a smartphone app developed for children aged 5–10 years with type 1 diabetes [30]. The game aims to encourage children to take more responsibility for their diabetes management by rewarding their efforts in logging and tracking blood sugar measurements. Virtual coins earned in the game can be used to build monsters and furnish the rooms within the manor house [30]. At the end of an evaluation undertaken 15 months after launch, the Monster Manor app had been downloaded 1238 times (Apple: 857, Android: 381) [31]. After one year, there were 50–75 active users per month (compared with a peak of 445 shortly after launch). In total, 7699 capillary blood glucose readings were logged. Of the 21 players completing the follow-up questionnaire, 40% played the game for longer than 1 month, and 19% reported a positive impact on the frequency of blood glucose testing [31]. Monster Manor has since been adapted to work wirelessly with an activity monitor to encourage children to increase their daily step count and active minutes [32]. This version of the game was evaluated in a randomized, 4-week crossover study of 42 healthy students in a school-based environment (11.3 ± 1.2 years old and 0.28 ± 1.29 body-mass index [BMI] z-score) [32]. When children were exposed to the game, an increase compared with the control phase of 2934 steps per day (p = 0.0004, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1434–4434) and 46 active minutes per day (p = 0.001, 95% CI 20–72) from baseline (12,299 steps/day and 190 active minutes/day) was observed [32]. Similarly, gamification-based smartphone applications may help with weight loss in obese adolescents [33]. Depression is commonly associated with growth hormone deficiency [34,35] and obesity [36]. Gamification can reduce cognitive biases which are commonly found in depression [37]. The success of the above game examples highlights the potential for gamification to promote positive self-management behaviour in children with GH deficiency.
Anxiety over administration can pose a considerable barrier to self-management in children with GH deficiency, due to the discomfort associated with daily subcutaneous injections [3]. In an Internet survey of 69 parents who had children with GH deficiency, 37% of the parents indicated that their children felt anxious about the administration of GH [38]. Coping behaviours, such as relaxation (e.g., breathing exercises, imagery, progressive muscle relaxation) or distraction techniques (e.g., counting backward, imagery, repeating a mantra, solving problems), can be beneficial for the relief of anxiety associated with painful medical procedures in children [39].
The application of gamification concepts for the management of anxiety and distress has recently been investigated in patients with chronic common mental health disorders (CMHDs) [40]. Flowy (PlayLab London) is a smartphone app that delivers breathing retraining exercises for anxiety, panic, and hyperventilation symptom management [41]. Patients control elements within the game by blowing into the microphone on their mobile device. An unblinded, Web-based, parallel-group, randomized, controlled, pilot trial was conducted in 63 participants to assess the impact of the game on health outcomes [40]. All respondents found Flowy to be a useful intervention and 89% said they would recommend it to friends. Use of Flowy resulted in a significant decrease in panic and hyperventilation, and an increase in quality of life scores in intervention participants from baseline to Week 4 (Table 1) [40]. Similarly, it may be possible to implement gamified breathing exercises in children with GH deficiency, to distract them from any feelings of anxiety or discomfort that are associated with daily injections.
Another potential option is to use virtual reality (VR) to distract children from the moment of injection. VR platforms have recently been shown to provide a significant amount of relief in patients with chronic pain [42]. This intervention works by saturating sensory pathways with an immersive experience, and can be conveniently delivered using ordinary smartphones coupled with a low-cost VR headset.
Practicalities and technical issues surrounding the delivery of GH due to a lack of adequate training can also result in non-compliance [3]. Issues with drug delivery, such as preparation of the GH solution, device function, poor technique, and incomplete transjection may affect the parent’s and child’s perceptions of the treatment [3]. Parents can feel shame if they are struggling to give treatment and may not want to admit this to their physician. Information on the duration of administration, the quality of injection, and side effects could be recorded within an app to identify and flag any potential issues. It is important to reassure parents that they are not alone, and that it is not unusual to ask for assistance if treatment is not going to plan. mHealth interventions via smartphones and tablets could provide a convenient platform to provide support and advice on common problems at home.
Empowerment of patients plays a significant role in treatment adherence. It is important that children are given responsibility for their health. Virtual pets have been successfully utilised in a number of serious games to empower children to take responsibility for their lifestyle choices [43,44,45]. In these games, the child is given responsibility for the care of the virtual pet, which develops in response to the achievement of daily health goals, e.g., physical activity, or fruit and vegetable intake. Virtual pets develop and grow over time in response to a player’s actions and achievements, but can also suffer from ‘poor care’ if the player’s achievements are lacking. Like real pets, they require the player to take care of them on a regular basis, resulting in a prolonged and continued interest in, and use of, these types of games (the Tamagotchi effect).
A preliminary study has been carried out in 59 children evaluating virtual pets as a vehicle for promoting physical activity [45]. Children interacted with a mobile kiosk with a television displaying a virtual dog, using a motion and voice detection device (Kinect for Windows). As part of the program, children were encouraged to set physical activity goals that were tracked by a wearable activity monitor. The virtual pet became more fit and learned more sophisticated tricks in response to the achievement of activity goals. Those who interacted with a virtual dog for three days engaged in an average of 1.09 more hours of exercise daily than children who interacted with a similar computer system without a virtual pet (p = 0.001) [45]. The children in both groups (‘treatment group’ with the virtual pet and ‘control group’ with an equivalent computer system but without a virtual pet) were also surveyed. Three interval scale items (1 = Not confident at all; 5 = Extremely confident) assessed the level of confidence that the children had about physical activity despite barriers, including, asking parents to sign up for a physical activity, fatigue, and outside weather. Four Likert scale items (1 = Don’t agree at all; 5 = Completely agree) assessed the extent to which children agreed with statements about the consequence of being physically active: it would be fun; it would help me be healthy; it would give me energy; it would help me spend more time with my friends. A single interval scale item (1 = I am sure I will not be physically active; 5 = I am sure I will be physical active) assessed the extent to which children intended to engage in physical activity following completion of the study. Results indicated that increased self-efficacy (one’s belief in one’s ability to accomplish a task) as a result of interacting with the virtual pet leads to increased favourable beliefs about physical activity. Children that interacted with the virtual pet also expressed marginally higher intentions to continue physical activity in the future when compared with the control group (p = 0.10), suggesting sustained behavioural change [45]. A similar approach could be adopted in the context of GH therapy to establish more positive perceptions about treatment and self-management.
Current adherence to paediatric GH therapy is suboptimal. In children, both parents (administering injections) and the child play a role. Reasons for poor adherence include forgetting to take/administer the injection or refill the prescription, being away from home, exhaustion from long-term injections (the child’s pain can be equally non-pleasant for parents administering the injection), and drug shortage and inaccessibility to the pharmacy. The barriers to adherence remain the same among adolescents, namely forgetting to take the injection, painful injections, concern about long-term complications, and exhaustion from long-term injections [46]. Gamification can help make the experience of administering injections more pleasant and less painful for both the child and her/his parents, and ensure better long-term compliance, e.g., by raising a virtual pet to keep the patient motivated and engaged.
Applying the ‘virtual pet’ approach to GH therapy, The authors propose the development and testing of a game app in which a virtual coach helps guide the child through the app and educates them on why GH therapy is necessary. The child is given ownership of the app and the responsibility to care for a virtual pet that needs their help and attention to grow. The app aims to establish a daily play moment to help distract (from pain), relax, and reward the child for injecting (or what the game refers to as ‘stamping’). Within the app, the child can select the room where they want to stamp, and where stamping will fit in their end of day routine. This helps the child to feel more in control of what will happen, when, and where. Once a routine is established, it is proposed that this will help to normalise injections and make it easier for the child (and his parents) to comply. As part of a mini-game, the child is first encouraged to complete a breathing exercise by blowing into the microphone of the smartphone to push the virtual pet on a swing. The parent ‘stamps’ the child when the child exhales and the app records the sound of the injection and the time taken to complete administration. If it takes too long to administer, this may be an indication that the parent needs further support from their healthcare professional. Upon the moment of injection, the virtual pet flies off the swing and the child must move the phone to collect rings and gain points. After the mini game has finished, the in-game virtual coach praises the child for stamping and asks for feedback on how the stamp went, e.g., the child’s mood, wet or dry injection, and the presence of bruising. In another mini-game, the child is encouraged to stamp the virtual pet. This can take place before or after the child’s own GH injection. The child selects the stamp and injects when the pet exhales. This exercise reinforces the need for daily injections and the importance of breathing when stamping. It is hoped that the child will form a bond with their virtual pet and will feel accountable if they do not take care of it by completing their daily injections. Over time, as the child maintains treatment, the virtual pet will grow and level up to unlock more functionality within the app. Points earned in the game can be used to buy items for the pet or to decorate rooms in its virtual house. Each level-up unlocks new activities and ways to interact with the pet, to keep the child engaged. The app can also be used to capture vital information on growth, adherence, adverse events, etc. Data are stored in a secure database and, with parental consent, may be used to provide healthcare professionals with a better insight on adherence so that they can direct therapy accordingly.
Games aimed at improving paediatric GH therapy adherence should carefully address the health literacy levels and needs of different children and their parents. Game designers are encouraged to observe the principles of clear health communication in their game materials (textual and audio-visual) [47], and to work with a representative sample of target users (children and their parents) in an iterative fashion to test (and refine) features of the games repeatedly, as necessary, early in the design and development process, to help to avoid late-stage failures.

4. Limitations of mHealth and Gamification

Gamified e-health is still a relatively nascent field and despite a growing body of evidence—a recent systematic review identified 46 such studies—there are relatively limited empirical data available [12]. Most studies have focussed on short-term engagement through intrinsic reward [12], with data on how this translates to sustained behavioural change being often lacking. Chronic disease management, however, is one of the most frequently studied areas (along with physical activity), and where tangible benefits have been seen [12,31,32,40]. Strong targeting to the user group, appropriate fresh content updates, a degree of customisation, and incorporation of emerging technologies and developments, will help to ensure that the longevity of the mHealth tool will be greatly increased.

5. Conclusions

Gamification strategies and mHealth interventions may provide an innovative new tool to support patients and parents in coping with chronic illnesses beyond the clinic. mHealth interventions, which rely on game mechanics, have demonstrated success in promoting healthy self-management behaviour in children with chronic conditions, such as diabetes. Based on these encouraging results, we propose that application of gamification strategies could prove to be useful in tackling some of the root causes of non-adherence in children treated with GH therapy, and they should be a focus of investigation and development (Table 2).

Author Contributions

All the authors contributed to the evaluation of the relevant literature and drafting, critical review, and approval of the final manuscript. M.N.K.B. also conceived Figure 1.


Strategen Limited provided editorial coordination support to the authors, funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


BMIbody mass index
CIconfidence interval
CMHDcommon mental health disorders
DMNdefault mode network
fMRIfunctional magnetic resonance imaging
GHgrowth hormone
mHealthmobile health
sMRIstructural magnetic resonance imaging
VRvirtual reality


  1. Stanley, T. Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in childhood. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2012, 19, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  2. Kemp, S.; Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency. Medscape. Available online: (accessed on 5 January 2017).
  3. Fisher, B.G.; Acerini, C.L. Understanding the growth hormone therapy adherence paradigm: A systematic review. Horm. Res. Paediatr. 2013, 79, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hughes, I.P.; Choong, C.; Rath, S.; Atkinson, H.; Cotterill, A.; Cutfield, W.; Hofman, P.; Harris, M. Early cessation and non-response are important and possibly related problems in growth hormone therapy: An OZGROW analysis. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 2016, 29, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cutfield, W.S.; Derraik, J.G.; Gunn, A.J.; Reid, K.; Delany, T.; Robinson, E.; Hofman, P.L. Non-compliance with growth hormone treatment in children is common and impairs linear growth. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Growth Hormone Research Society. Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Growth Hormone (GH) deficiency in childhood and adolescence: Summary statement of the GH Research Society. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000, 85, 3990–3993. [Google Scholar]
  7. Francischinelli, A.G.B.; Almeida, F.D.A.; Fernandes, D.M.S.O. Routine use of therapeutic play in the care of hospitalized children: Nurses’ perceptions. Acta Paul. Enferm. 2012, 25, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, W.; Chung, J.O.; Ho, K.Y.; Kwok, B.M.C. Play interventions to reduce anxiety and negative emotions in hospitalized children. BMC Pediatr. 2016, 16, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  9. GameTrack Digest: Quarter1 2016. Available online: (accessed on 5 January 2017).
  10. Kabali, H.K.; Irigoyen, M.M.; Nunez-Davis, R.; Budacki, J.G.; Mohanty, S.H.; Leister, K.P.; Bonner, R.L. Exposure and use of mobile media devices by young children. Pediatrics 2015, 136, 1044–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Holtz, B.; Lauckner, C. Diabetes management via mobile phones: A systematic review. Telemed. J. E Health 2012, 18, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sardi, L.; Idri, A.; Fernández-Alemán, J.L. A systematic review of gamification in e-Health. J. Biomed. Inform. 2017, 71, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Deterding, S.; Miguel, S.; Nacke, L.; O’Hara, K.; Dixon, D. Gamification: Using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In Proceedings of the CHI‘11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–12 May 2011; pp. 2425–2428. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kamel Boulos, M.N.; Gammon, S.; Dixon, M.C.; MacRury, S.M.; Fergusson, M.J.; Miranda, R.F.; Mourinho, B.T.; Yang, S.P. Digital games for type 1 and type 2 diabetes: Underpinning theory with three illustrative examples. JMIR Serious Games 2015, 3, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Charlier, N.; Zupancic, N.; Fieuws, S.; Denhaerynck, K.; Zaman, B.; Moons, P. Serious games for improving knowledge and self-management in young people with chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2015, 23, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Stokes, B. Video games have changed: Time to consider “serious games”. Dev. Educ. J. 2005, 11, 108. [Google Scholar]
  17. Miller, A.S.; Cafazzo, J.A.; Seto, E. A game plan: Gamification design principles in mHealth applications for chronic disease management. Health Inform. J. 2014, 22, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Von Bargen, T.; Zientz, C.; Haux, R. Gamification for mHealth—A review of playful mobile healthcare. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2014, 202, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Cugelman, B. Gamification: What it is and why it matters to digital health behavior change developers. JMIR Serious Games 2013, 1, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Koepp, M.J.; Gunn, R.N.; Lawrence, A.D.; Cunningham, V.J.; Dagher, A.; Jones, T.; Brooks, D.J.; Bench, C.J.; Grasby, P.M. Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game. Nature 1998, 393, 266–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Votinov, M.; Pripfl, J.; Windischberger, C.; Sailer, U.; Lamm, C. Better you lose than I do: Neural networks involved in winning and losing in a real time strictly competitive game. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Beck, S.M.; Locke, H.S.; Savine, A.C.; Jimura, K.; Braver, T.S. Primary and secondary rewards differentially modulate neural activity dynamics during working memory. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Howard-Jones, P.A.; Jay, T.; Mason, A.; Jones, H. Gamification of learning deactivates the default mode network. Front. Psychol. 2016, 6, 1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2000, 25, 54–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nicholson, S. A user-centered theoretical framework for meaningful gamification. Presented at the Games + Learning + Society 8.0, Madison, WI, USA, 13–15 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chou, Y. Octalysis: Complete Gamification Framework. Available online: (accessed on 9 January 2017).
  27. Larkin, M. Want to Create an Educational Game? Here’s What You Need to Know? Available online: (accessed on 9 January 2017).
  28. Haverkamp, F.; Johansson, L.; Dumas, H.; Langham, S.; Tauber, M.; Veimo, D.; Chiarelli, F. Observations of nonadherence to recombinant human growth hormone therapy in clinical practice. Clin. Ther. 2008, 30, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Andela, C.D.; Biermasz, N.R.; Kaptein, A.A.; Pereira, A.M.; Tiemensma, J. More concerns and stronger beliefs about the necessity of medication in patients with acromegaly are associated with negative illness perceptions and impairment in quality of life. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 2015, 25, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ayogo Health Inc. Monster Manor. Google Play/iTunes. Available online: or (accessed on 9 January 2017).
  31. Oxford Academic Health Science Network. Child’s Play: Encouraging 5–10 Years Olds with Type 1 Diabetes to Log Blood Glucose Readings. Available online: (accessed on 9 January 2017).
  32. Garde, A.; Umedaly, A.; Abulnaga, S.M.; Junker, A.; Chanoine, J.P.; Johnson, M.; Ansermino, J.M.; Dumont, G.A. Evaluation of a novel mobile exergame in a school-based environment. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2016, 19, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Timpel, P.; Cesena, F.H.Y.; da Silva Costa, C.; Soldatelli, M.D.; Gois, E., Jr.; Castrillon, E.; Díaz, L.J.J.; Repetto, G.M.; Hagos, F.; Castillo Yermenos, R.E.; et al. Efficacy of gamification-based smartphone application for weight loss in overweight and obese adolescents: Study protocol for a phase II randomized controlled trial. Ther. Adv. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 9, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Abe, S.; Okumura, A.; Mukae, T.; Nakazawa, T.; Niijima, S.I.; Yamashiro, Y.; Shimizu, T. Depressive tendency in children with growth hormone deficiency. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2009, 45, 636–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Onenli-Mungan, N.; Topaloglu, K.; Avci, A.; Ozer, G. Short stature due to growth hormone neurosecretory dysfunction in a child with major depressive disorder. Indian Pediatr. 2004, 41, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Quek, Y.H.; Tam, W.W.S.; Zhang, M.W.B.; Ho, R.C.M. Exploring the association between childhood and adolescent obesity and depression: A meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. 2017, 18, 742–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, M.W.B.; Ying, J.B.; Song, G.; Ho, R.C.M. A review of gamification approaches in commercial cognitive bias modification gaming applications. Technol. Health Care 2018, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Van Dongen, N.; Kaptein, A.A. Parents’ views on growth hormone treatment for their children: Psychosocial issues. Patient Prefer. Adher. 2012, 6, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Schiff, W.B.; Holtz, K.D.; Peterson, N.; Rakusan, T. Effect of an intervention to reduce procedural pain and distress for children with HIV infection. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 2001, 26, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Pham, Q.; Khatib, Y.; Stansfeld, S.; Fox, S.; Green, T. Feasibility and efficacy of an mHealth Game for managing anxiety: “Flowy” randomized controlled pilot trial and design evaluation. Games Health J. 2016, 5, 50–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Playlab London. Google Play. 1 December 2015. Flowy Beta. Available online: (accessed on 9 January 2017).
  42. Jones, T.; Moore, T.; Choo, J. The impact of virtual reality on chronic pain. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0167523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Johnsen, K.; Ahn, S.J.; Moore, J.; Brown, S.; Robertson, T.P.; Marable, A.; Basu, A. Mixed reality virtual pets to reduce childhood obesity. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2014, 20, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ahn, S.J.; Johnsen, K.; Moore, J.; Brown, S.; Biersmith, M.; Ball, C. Using virtual pets to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in children: A technology-assisted social cognitive theory approach. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2016, 19, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ahn, S.J.; Johnsen, K.; Robertson, T.; Moore, J.; Brown, S.; Marable, A.; Basu, A. Using virtual pets to promote physical activity in children: An application of the youth physical activity promotion model. J. Health Commun. 2015, 20, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mohseni, S.; Heydari, Z.; Qorbani, M.; Radfar, M. Adherence to growth hormone therapy in children and its potential barriers. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 31, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  47. Doak, L.G.; Doak, C.C. (Eds.) Principles for Clear Health Communication, 2nd ed.; Pfizer: New York, NY, USA, 2004; Available online: (accessed on 23 August 2018).
Figure 1. Integral pathways of influence and feedback for the development of successful gamification strategies for behavioural change.
Figure 1. Integral pathways of influence and feedback for the development of successful gamification strategies for behavioural change.
J 01 00008 g001
Table 1. Psychometric questionnaire scores in response to an app (‘Flowy’) aimed at reducing anxiety, panic, and hyperventilation in patients with chronic common mental health disorders; reproduced with permission from [40].
Table 1. Psychometric questionnaire scores in response to an app (‘Flowy’) aimed at reducing anxiety, panic, and hyperventilation in patients with chronic common mental health disorders; reproduced with permission from [40].
Intervention *
OutcomeBaselineWeek 2Week 4p
Panic (PDSS-SR)
Mean (SD)16.90 (5.24)15.42 (5.42)15.35 (5.78)0.011
Hyperventilation (Nijmegen)
Mean (SD)24.45 (9.79)22.45 (10.61)21.74 (11.27)0.016
Quality of life (Q-LES-Q-SF)
Mean (SD)32.11 (7.32)35.67 (5.08)35.89 (7.71) 0.005
* Participants in the intervention group received free access to Flowy, whilst controls had no access to the app. PDSS-SR, Panic Disorder Severity Scale-Self Report; Q-LES-Q-SF, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form; SD, standard deviation. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Table 2. Summary of how mHealth and gamification can support adherence to GH therapy.
Table 2. Summary of how mHealth and gamification can support adherence to GH therapy.
Providing a source of information and guidance that is understandable and that resonates with the child:
  • Why therapy is necessary—empowerment and taking responsibility of their own care
  • Setting realistic goals—motivate/positive belief
  • Importance of adherence—encourage on-going engagement e.g., through rewards, progression through levels, emotional bond with virtual pet etc.
  • Scheduling injections—reminders and establishing a routine
Reduce anxiety and stress over administration
Providing mechanisms to distract and relax:
  • e.g., Interaction with virtual pet, breathing exercises (blowing into microphone)
Providing praise and feedback to the child, and information for healthcare professionals to better guide management:
  • Track growth—predicted height
  • Technical issues with GH administration—e.g., capture feedback on bruising etc., record sound to assess duration of administration etc.
  • Adverse events

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Radovick, S.; Hershkovitz, E.; Kalisvaart, A.; Koning, M.; Paridaens, K.; Kamel Boulos, M.N. Gamification Concepts to Promote and Maintain Therapy Adherence in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency. J 2018, 1, 71-80.

AMA Style

Radovick S, Hershkovitz E, Kalisvaart A, Koning M, Paridaens K, Kamel Boulos MN. Gamification Concepts to Promote and Maintain Therapy Adherence in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency. J. 2018; 1(1):71-80.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Radovick, Sally, Eli Hershkovitz, Aline Kalisvaart, Marco Koning, Kristine Paridaens, and Maged N. Kamel Boulos. 2018. "Gamification Concepts to Promote and Maintain Therapy Adherence in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency" J 1, no. 1: 71-80.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop