Next Article in Journal
Optimal Investment Strategy for Off-Grid Offshore Wind Hydrogen Production: Hybrid and Standalone PEM Electrolyzer Configuration Comparison
Previous Article in Journal
Valorization of Paper Pulp Mill Sludge for Protease Production by Indigenous Bacillus tropicus P4
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microwave Depolymerization of Various Plastic Wastes—Quarter-Scale Testing

by
Andrzej Piotrowicz
1,*,
Janusz Kolczyński
1,
Mirosław Kostrzewa
1,
Wojciech Kaczmarek
1 and
Bogdan Samojeden
2,*
1
Eco Harpoon Recycling Sp. z o.o., 05-152 Cząstków Mazowiecki, Poland
2
Department of Fuel Technology, Faculty of Energy and Fuels, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Clean Technol. 2026, 8(2), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8020044
Submission received: 15 January 2026 / Revised: 26 February 2026 / Accepted: 3 March 2026 / Published: 19 March 2026

Abstract

Microwave-assisted depolymerization (MD) of heterogeneous postconsumer plastics was carried out in a quarter-scale reactor to evaluate product composition and the influence of feedstock type on oil quantity and quality. Various waste streams, including: PS, PP, ABS materials, keyboard housings, textile plastics, PCBs, and mixed electronic components, were processed in 3–6 kg batches using magnetron powers up to 2 × 1.55 kW. All experiments yielded a condensed liquid fraction, with color intensity correlating with aromatic content. FTIR spectroscopy showed that all oils consisted of hydrocarbon matrices dominated by aliphatic C-H stretching bands (2956–2850 cm−1). Aromatic contributions varied significantly: PS produced oils rich in aromatic OOP C-H bands (900–650 cm−1), PP yielded predominantly aliphatic oils with minor aromatic features, and ABS or electronics materials produced mixed aliphatic–aromatic profiles. Textile oils additionally exhibited carbonyl and O-H bands, indicating oxygenated decomposition products. Fractional distillation separated the oils into low-boiling aliphatic (<250 °C) and heavier aromatic (250–350 °C) fractions. These results suggest that MD reliably converts diverse plastic wastes into hydrocarbon oils whose spectroscopic characteristics reflect both feedstock composition and thermal pathways intrinsic to microwave heating.

1. Introduction

1.1. Global Dynamics of Plastic Waste, Limitations of Existing Recycling Strategies

Since the mid-20th century, global plastic (P) production has expanded at an unprecedented rate, fundamentally reshaping material flows and waste streams; production increased from approximately 2 M Mg in 1950 to more than 390 M Mg in 2021, and the total mass produced is estimated to exceed 8.3 B Mg [1]. According to the comprehensive mass/balance model [1], nearly 79% of P have accumulated in landfills or the natural environment, while only 9% have entered formal recycling systems.
The short lifespan of consumer P equipment, often less than six months for packaging materials, combined with the rapid growth of single-use applications, has exacerbated the accumulation of persistent waste [2,3]. Forecasts suggest that by 2050, global annual P waste generation could reach 800 M Mg, with mismanagement rates increasing in regions lacking advanced recycling infrastructure [4]. Traditional recycling technique approaches have failed to keep pace with production; while mechanical recycling is widely implemented, it suffers from well-documented drawbacks, including progressive polymer degradation, contamination sensitivity, limited compatibility between polymer classes, and the downcycling of materials into lower-value applications [3,5]. Furthermore, multilayer films, fiber-reinforced polymer, and heavily pigmented P remain practically unrecyclable via mechanical routes [6].
Chemical recycling, particularly thermal pyrolysis, has emerged as a more flexible strategy capable of processing heterogeneous and contaminated feedstocks [5,7]. However, many conventional pyrolysis studies report operating temperatures in the range of 450–550 °C with residence times from tens of minutes up to over an hour [5,6,8]. Moreover, the broad hydrocarbon distributions characteristic of pyrolysis oils can limit their direct use in refineries without upgrading processes [9]. These limitations have shifted attention toward alternative heating approaches, among which MD offers a fundamentally different mode of energy delivery.

1.2. Physicochemical Principles of Microwave Heating of Polymers

Microwave heating arises from the interaction between electromagnetic radiation (at 2.45 GHz) and matter through dipolar rotation and ionic conduction [7,10]. The resulting internal energy deposition contrasts sharply with conventional heating, where thermal energy must be transferred from externally heated reactor walls inward via conduction and convection. In practical operation, this difference translates into faster heating and a noticeably more dynamic thermal response than that observed in conventional wall-heated reactors, particularly during rapid changes in applied power.
Nevertheless, polymers (PM) such as polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) have low dielectric loss factors, making them poor absorbers of microwave energy [8,11]. This is due to the material’s inherent ability to dissipate electromagnetic energy into heat when subjected to an alternating electric field; a higher loss factor directly corresponds to superior microwave absorption, allowing materials to heat faster by dissipating more energy via polarization and conduction. As a result, microwave pyrolysis of P relies on the addition of microwave susceptors: materials capable of rapidly converting microwave energy into heat. Graphite, carbon black, biochar, and activated carbon are commonly used due to their high dielectric loss and electronic conduction pathways [12,13].
Graphite particles exposed to microwave irradiation can achieve T exceeding 1000–1200 °C within 10–20 s, significantly beyond what can be reached in conventional heating systems over comparable timescales [12,14]. These localized high T zones act as catalytic surfaces where PM chains undergo thermal cracking, producing radical intermediates that propagate depolymerization reactions [13]. Reported energy efficiencies for MD can reach 70–85% under optimized laboratory conditions, whereas conventional pyrolysis often exhibits efficiencies below 50% due to external heat losses [11].
Another distinguishing feature of microwave heating is its ability to preferentially couple with materials of differing dielectric properties, leading to selective heating effects. For instance, carbon-filled fractions of mixed P waste reach higher T than PM-only regions, enabling controlled initiation of depolymerization while leaving the surrounding material cooler [10,15,16].

1.3. MD Pathways for Major PM Classes

1.3.1. PE and PP

Polyolefins (by the way, representing nearly 60% of global P production [1,17]) degrade primarily through random scission and β-scission mechanisms under microwave conditions. In [18], it was reported that LDPE (low-density polyethylene) subjected to microwave irradiation in the presence of carbonaceous susceptors at 450–520 °C yields 65–75 wt% liquid hydrocarbons within 2–3 min. Product distribution was dominated by linear alkanes and alkenes in the C10–C15 range, reflecting minimal secondary aromatization.
Microwave pyrolysis of PP at 430–500 °C produces 55–70 wt% liquids within 3–7 min, with the product rich in branched hydrocarbons due to PP tertiary carbon sites [19]. In comparison, conventional pyrolysis studies typically report oil yields of 45–60 wt% for PE and PP, often requiring 20–40 min to reach comparable T [5].
Elsewhere [17], it is demonstrated that rapid, non-equilibrium heating of polyolefins can reduce apparent activation energies relative to conventional slow-heating experiments, supporting the potential advantages of microwave-based energy coupling. Liquid yields exceeding 80 wt% have been reported under optimized microwave conditions for certain PP feedstocks, particularly in reactors employing high surface area carbon susceptors [19,20].

1.3.2. PS

Among commodity PM, PS exhibits the highest monomer recovery potential due to its depolymerization mechanism. Styrene yields 75–85 wt% during microwave pyrolysis at 350–420 °C, significantly outperforming conventional pyrolysis, which typically delivers 50–60 wt% monomer at 450–500 °C [21]. Minimal char formation (<2 wt%) and narrow molecular weight distributions are observed under microwave irradiation [9]. Studies have also shown that microwave processing reduces secondary crosslinking reactions, preserving monomer integrity [9,21,22].

1.3.3. PET and Polyesters

Microwave-assisted glycolysis of PET has gained considerable attention due to the high-value monomers it produces. PET depolymerizes to BHET (bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate) in 5–15 min at 180–220 °C, whereas conventional glycolysis requires 60–180 min at similar T [23]. PET depolymerizes above 80% conversion rate during microwave methanolysis at 160–200 °C within 20–30 min, compared with 2–3 h under oil bath heating [24]. The acceleration is attributed to selective heating of catalysts and reactants, leading to enhanced reaction rates.
Recent studies have also explored microwave-assisted catalytic pyrolysis of PET, showing increased yields of terephthalic acid and reduced formation of oxygenated aromatics relative to traditional pyrolysis [25].

1.3.4. PVC and Halogenated PM

PVC (polyvinyl chloride) presents significant hazards during thermal conversion due to HCl evolution. Microwave pyrolysis with carbon susceptors moderates HCl release and suppresses formation of chlorinated aromatic compounds [26]. In other work [27], improved behavior when PVC was co-processed with polyolefins under microwave irradiation was observed, reducing local overheating and increasing hydrocarbon yields.

1.4. Challenges Arising from Heterogeneity in P Waste

Municipal solid waste (MSW) plastics comprise mixed PM, multilayer laminates, fillers, pigments, flame retardants, stabilizers, and moisture. Heating nonuniformity in mixed P under microwave irradiation can exceed 200 °C, with PE-rich fractions remaining below 150 °C while carbon-containing regions surpass 400–600 °C [28]. These disparities lead to incomplete conversion and unpredictable product compositions.
Reported oil yields in microwave-assisted pyrolysis systems typically range between approximately 50 and 80 wt%, depending on polymer type, reactor configuration, and the presence of microwave susceptors [16,17,19].
This patent [29] mitigated these challenges by introducing 10–20 wt% carbon susceptors, demonstrating complete conversion within 5–10 min and oil yields of 60–70 wt%. In [30], 200–500 g of mixed waste batches was processed at 450–550 °C, observing distinct relationships between feed composition and product distribution: PP-rich feeds favored branched C5–C12 hydrocarbons, whereas PE-dominant feeds yielded linear C10–C20 alkanes.
Studies using pilot- or semi-pilot microwave reactors (0.5–5 kg capacity) [31] further indicate that moisture content and particle size distribution critically influence heating patterns, underscoring the need for systematic scale-up methodologies.

1.5. Scale-Up Constraints and Microwave Reactor Engineering

Scaling up microwave reactors is associated with several inherent physical constraints. Electromagnetic simulations [32] show significant standing wave formation in cavities exceeding 20 cm in characteristic dimension. The penetration depth at 2.45 GHz in carbon PM mixtures remains limited to 1–3 cm [33,34], restricting effective bed thickness unless agitation or mixing mechanisms are introduced.
Reliable operation is typically sustained only up to batch sizes of 150–200 g, while attempts beyond 300–500 g require specialized multimode cavities, rotating beds, or hybrid heating systems [33]. Improved uniformity can be achieved in agitated microwave beds [35], whereas multimode cavity excitation improved heating homogeneity by 30–45% relative to single-mode systems [36]. Mass/transfer limitations in molten PM beds are highlighted in [37], showing that reduced bubble escape leads to local accumulation of gaseous intermediates and increased secondary cracking.
Pilot-scale studies employing 1–5 kW microwave power sources [34,38] report mixed results, with heating non-uniformity, susceptor degradation, and reactor-wall arcing identified as recurring challenges. Nevertheless, these studies emphasize the potential of MD as a scalable platform if properly engineered.
In the broader context of strategies, classification of thermochemical processes such as MD as “chemical recycling” requires transparent and robust assessment frameworks. As highlighted by Giordano et al. [39], emerging circular economy technologies must be evaluated not only in terms of technical feasibility, but also through consistent mass/energy balances, product quality metrics, and environmental performance indicators. Without such structured assessment, contribution of advanced recycling routes to circular material flows may be overestimated. In this context, intermediate-scale experimental validation plays a crucial role in bridging laboratory demonstrations and industrial deployment.

1.6. Motivation and Objectives of the Present Work

Considering the extensive limitations of mechanical recycling [2,3], the slow and energetically inefficient nature of conventional pyrolysis [5,6,7,8], and the promising yet under-scaled advancement of MD [11,16,33], there exists a clear need for intermediate-scale experimental validation. The present work, “Microwave depolymerization of various plastic wastes: quarter-scale testing”, addresses this gap by evaluating MD of P wastes in typically a few kilograms, representative of the transitional region between laboratory and pilot scales (quarter of the design capacity of the pilot reactor, i.e., loads of 3–6 kg, above typical experiments from the literature).
The study examines thermal behavior, energy efficiency, phase distributions, and the influence of feed composition and material morphology. Through this approach, this work aims to generate insights directly applicable to pilot-scale systems and inform the engineering requirements for industrial implementation of MD technologies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reactor Description

Schematic diagrams of the depolymerization installation used, including the following systems: purge, reactor and batch material loading, temperature measurement, heating, electrical connections (Figure 1a), liquid product cooling and gaseous product outlet (Figure 1b), are presented. The microwave reactor employed in this study was an in-house constructed unit fabricated primarily from weldable structural steel, with several detachable joints incorporated to facilitate maintenance and sampling. The reactor consists of a cylindrical chamber with an effective internal volume of 35.3 L (dimensions: L = 50 cm, D = 30 cm), thermally insulated on the outside with glass wool to minimize heat losses. The batch material is placed directly inside this cylindrical chamber, which serves as the reaction zone.
A stainless steel tube penetrates the upper section of the reactor and houses a thermocouple (K-type, DT-3610B, CEM, Shenzhen, China), which provides sequential measurements of the gas phase temperature inside the reactor during MD. A second steel tube supplies N2 (technical grade; Eltech and BLK Technical Gases (distributor), Warsaw, Poland) to establish an inert atmosphere. During standard tests, N2 was introduced at a flow rate of 5–20 L·min−1 (for 15–30 min), ensuring displacement of air.
The reactor is additionally equipped with a safety relief outlet. This outlet is constructed as a flanged assembly fixed to the reactor body, sealed with a graphite gasket (Sigraflex Uniprom, SGL Carbon, Wiesbaden, Germany) and covered with a thin copper foil acting as a rupture membrane. Two rectangular waveguides (according to WR-340 specification), each terminating in a bolted flange, are welded directly onto the reactor wall. These waveguides transmit microwave radiation generated by one or two magnetrons (2M210-M1, 2455 Hz, Panasonic, Kadoma, Japan), which are rigidly mounted to the corresponding flanges. Material loading is carried out through a sealed access port; the loading window is fitted with a custom cut graphite gasket (same as mentioned earlier) and secured with multiple bolts to guarantee airtight closure during operation.
Volatile products generated during MD exit the reactor through a horizontally oriented outlet tube (inner diameter = 2 cm) welded to the chamber. This tube is connected via a clamped flexible hose to a glass condenser cooled with continuous water flow. The condensed liquid products are collected in a glass receiver (glass jar) located downstream of the condenser. This receiver accumulates the main oil fraction as well as condensed gaseous components. Electrical measurements, including voltage, current, and magnetron power consumption, were monitored using the following devices: magnetron power supplies (E-WB1500FD, Xi’an ECPS Electronics Technology Co., Ltd., Xi’an, China), DC power supply (PXN-1503D, Zhaoxin, Shenzhen, China), and a process calibrator/meter (Escort 2000, Escort Company, Taipei, China).

2.2. Experimental Procedure

After determining the optimal voltage value on the magnetron(s) at which the depolymerization T is obtained, hereinafter referred to as the process T (the T that is obtained at optimal voltage), the actual depolymerization tests were carried out at this voltage. The test procedure: batch material loading, N2 purge, heating, product condensation, begins by placing the batch material into the reactor chamber through the loading window, which is then sealed and mechanically tightened. If necessary, if the condenser was clogged with sticky oil fractions after the previous test, the condenser was chemically cleaned with a suitable solvent. N2 is introduced to purge the system, after which cooling water is circulated through the condenser. The magnetron(s) is/are then activated, and T, electrical parameters, and operating conditions are continuously recorded. Microwave irradiation causes rapid heating of the batch material, initiating MD. The volatile pyrolysis products are transported from the reactor to the condenser, where they are cooled and collected as the main oil fraction.
The process termination criterion was defined as the cessation of condensation of the liquid product. Upon completion of each test, the total volume of the collected oil fraction is measured to an accuracy of ±10 mL, and a representative sample is withdrawn for analysis. The bulk liquid product is subsequently subjected to fractional distillation conducted in two T ranges: to 250 °C and 250–350 °C. Distillation is performed using a standard simple distillation apparatus consisting of a two-neck, round-bottom flask (4 L) equipped with a thermometer port and a vapor outlet. Cooling water serves as the condensing medium. The oil is heated using an electric heating mantle (98-II-C, 4000 mL, Chemland, Stargard, Poland). For safety, the entire distillation setup is operated inside a ventilated fume hood. Following each distillation step, samples of the distilled oils are collected for subsequent characterization. Non-condensed gaseous fractions are not recovered directly; instead, their volume is estimated from the difference between the initial volume of the collected oil fraction and the total volume of distillates.

2.3. Analytical Methods

All samples, namely the main oil fraction and the two distillation fractions (≤250 °C and 250–350 °C), were analyzed using infrared (IR) spectroscopy: the spectra were recorded on Perkin Elmer Frontier spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) (in the region of 4000–650 cm−1 with a resolution of 1 cm−1; number of scans—32; correction—atmospheric (H2O/CO2); configuration: MIR TGS detector (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA), MIR source (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA), KBr beam splitter; measurement accessories: UATR attachment (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) (diamond/ZnSe), 3-bounce). The obtained spectra were used to assess the chemical composition of the depolymerized products and to identify characteristic functional groups present in each fraction. In addition to qualitative band assignment, semi-quantitative comparison of selected spectral regions was performed as described below.
Measurements were performed using the Attenuated Total Internal Reflection (ATR) (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) technique, which is standard in the analysis of oil products, eliminating the need for cuvettes and ensuring repeatable measurements for thin films:
  • Optical System Preparation: Before sample application, the crystal surface was cleaned using a soft, lint-free tissue and a solvent appropriate for the matrix (isopropanol), drying the surface until streaks were completely removed.
  • Background Correction: The background spectrum was recorded against air (clean crystal). This procedure was repeated after each measurement series and in the event of changes in ambient conditions (fluctuations in water vapor or CO2 concentration).
  • Sample Application: A small amount of oil (a few µL) was applied to the active area of the ATR crystal, ensuring thorough surface coverage and elimination of air bubbles.
  • Measurement Procedure: Measurements were performed while maintaining constant parameters (number of scans, resolution, range). For quantitative analysis, a standardized baseline correction procedure was used, along with ATR correction when necessary. Post-measurement procedure: The crystal was cleaned immediately after sample removal to prevent the formation of a permanent residual film.
For comparative interpretation across feedstocks, band areas were evaluated after baseline correction (rubber-band/polynomial, identical settings for all spectra). Integrated absorbance was calculated over fixed wavenumber windows: aliphatic C-H stretching (3000–2800 cm−1), aromatic ring region (1605–1495 cm−1), carbonyl region (1850–1650 cm−1), and hydroxyl region (3600–3200 cm−1). The following spectral indices were used to describe relative contributions: Aromaticity Index ArI = ∫(1605−1495)/∫(3000−2800), Carbonyl Index CI = ∫(1850−1650)/∫(3000−2800), and Hydroxyl Index OHI = ∫(3600−3200)/∫(3000−2800). These calculated indices provide semi-quantitative comparative trends only; due to overlap and matrix effects (especially in ATR), they are not used for absolute compositional determination.

2.4. Batch Materials

The following materials were used as input materials (batch) for testing:
  • PS—plastics from refrigerator and freezer drawers, household appliances, etc.;
  • PP—office waste bins, lawn mower bins, compact disk cases (but not “jewel cases”);
  • keyboards—scrapped keyboards with cut wires;
  • PCB—class I and II printed circuit boards;
  • AiO—rear parts of the AiO computer case (monitor backs), TFT monitors;
  • textile—soiled work clothes (T-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets) and rags;
  • ABS—cut television monitor housings;
  • ABS “mix”—a mixture of various plastics, without prior segregation, mainly: ABS PC, polycarbonates from electronics, washing machine, printer and photocopier components, etc.;
  • ABS drum, PP T2O—parts of washing machine drums made of plastic.
All materials were weighed on a scale Cely Dibal PS50-M (Dibal, Derio, Spain).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. MD Tests

The effect of magnetron voltage on the thermal behavior of the reactor was examined for different feedstocks, as summarized in Table 1. For each experimental batch, the table lists:
  • the operating voltage of the magnetron(s);
  • the measured current and estimated microwave power;
  • the maximum T recorded inside the reactor (via the thermocouple positioned in the gas phase).
The data encompass multiple feedstock types and heating conditions, allowing direct comparison between tests.
Table 1. Dependence of T inside the reactor chamber on the voltage and power of the magnetron(s)—various tests.
Table 1. Dependence of T inside the reactor chamber on the voltage and power of the magnetron(s)—various tests.
BatchT/Voltage/Power
PSV1.5–2.32.93.33.94.1
°C20–3030–4550–5565–85>200
PPV1.51.92.32.93.3
°C20457080100
keyboardsV1.11.5–1.92.32.93.33.94.14.5
°C202530–354045–50100–110120–200>200
PCBV1.52.32.93.33.94.1
°C255085120145>200
AiOV1.51.92.32.93.33.94.1
°C406075110120130>205
textileV1.51.92.32.93.33.94.1
W6108009201110125014101550
°C202530406095>190
ABS drum, PP T2OV1.51.92.32.93.33.94.1
one magnetrontwo magnetrons (2 × 4.1 V)
°C95–100140–145155160170–190180–235245435
ABS drum, PP T2O, material ground in a shredderV1.11.51.92.32.93.33.94.1
°C2025–4050–7575–95105–120120–140140–170>170
ABS “mix”V1.51.92.32.93.33.94.1
°C45607595120140–155>200
Across all test batches, raising the magnetron voltage resulted in higher internal T, but the relationship is not linear. Thus, small increases in voltage produce disproportionately large increases in T once microwave absorption becomes efficient.
PS demonstrates the most efficient microwave coupling, reaching 200 °C at approximately 4.1 V and <1.1 kW magnetron power, whereas PP requires at least 3.3–3.5 V and significantly higher cumulative energy input to achieve similar T. ABS and electronics-derived feedstocks occupy an intermediate position, while textile exhibits the slowest heating response.
A comparison of the voltage/temperature relationships for different feedstocks reveals clear differences in microwave coupling efficiency. PS: internal reactor T above 200 °C already at approximately 4.1 V and <1.1 kW magnetron power, confirming its rapid transition to a microwave-absorbing, partially carbonized state. By contrast, PP requires 3.3–3.5 V and substantially higher cumulative energy input to achieve similar T, reflecting its weaker dielectric response. ABS and electronics derive show intermediate behavior, whereas textile heats more slowly due to its heterogeneous PM composition. Taken together, the results show that differences in PM chemistry affect how efficiently microwave energy is transformed into heat in the tested system.
Table 2 is an example of the relationship between cumulative energy consumption of the magnetron and the T measured inside the reactor during the PS depolymerization test. As the experiment progressed, the energy delivered to the microwave system increased steadily, while the measured internal T exhibited a characteristic nonlinear rise. Initial heating required a relatively large amount of energy to achieve a modest T increase, reflecting the low microwave absorption efficiency of solid PS before the onset of thermal softening. Once the material began to melt and early stage depolymerization products formed, the heating rate increased noticeably. This behavior is consistent with the development of a carbonized surface layer and molten PM that enhance microwave coupling.
At higher cumulative energy inputs, T approached its maximum plateau, indicating that heat losses and endothermic depolymerization reactions balanced the microwave power absorbed by the feedstock.
A thermal imaging camera was used to observe the external T distribution of the reactor during microwave operation (Figure 2); it revealed a heterogeneous T field across the outer steel surface, reflecting the internal distribution of microwave energy within the reactor cavity. The hottest region was consistently located around the welded waveguide section where microwave radiation entered the chamber. This area exhibited a distinct thermal maximum, forming a clearly visible high-T cluster on the thermogram. Slightly elevated T was also noted along the upper portion of the cylindrical wall, corresponding to the zone in which the carbonaceous susceptor and PM mixture accumulated during processing.
The remaining areas of the reactor surface displayed moderate and relatively uniform T, indicating effective thermal insulation by the surrounding glass wool layer. Importantly, no abnormal hotspots or local overheating zones were observed near the flange seals or at the loading window, confirming that thermal stress was concentrated primarily in the intended energy input regions. The gradient shown in the thermographic image aligns with expectations for microwave-driven processes in which internal heating is dominated by the dielectric and conductive properties of the feedstock rather than by conduction through the reactor wall.
Overall, the thermal image provides visual confirmation of the characteristic heating behavior of microwave reactors, localized energy deposition at the susceptor interface and rapid heat buildup in regions directly exposed to high field intensity. These observations are consistent with the kinetic behavior inferred from oil formation profiles and support the interpretation that polymer decomposition is strongly influenced by localized interactions between microwave fields and carbonaceous susceptors.
Table 1, together with thermal imaging observations, suggests that:
  • localized heating near the waveguide entry points results in rapid T rise;
  • the thermocouple, which measures gas-phase T, underestimates the true local maxima in the solid phase;
  • T gradients play an important role in the initiation of depolymerization reactions.
Hence, the measured T should be interpreted as approximate indicators of reaction conditions, reflecting the bulk thermal state rather than localized hot spots.
MD tests proceeded consistently across all examined feedstocks, producing a condensed oil fraction in every experiment and a non-condensed gaseous fraction whose volume decreased with increasing aromaticity of the starting PM (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8). Materials rich in styrene or acrylonitrile softened rapidly and initiated volatilisation at lower apparent bulk T, whereas PP- and ABS-containing P required longer irradiation to reach equivalent conversion. This behavior is consistent with their different thermal pathways: styrenic PM undergo depolymerization via unzipping reactions, while polyolefins crack through random scission.
The condensed oils displayed noticeable color differences that correlated with chemical composition (Figure 3, Figure 7 and Figure 8). Oils obtained from polypropylene were the lightest, typically yellow to light orange and became darker only after distillation. ABS oils were orange/brown, whereas PS- and electronics-oils were distinctly dark brown, probably reflecting their higher aromatic content. Textile oils showed the greatest variability, ranging from yellow/brown to reddish, and in some cases exhibited slight turbidity, consistent with the presence of oxygenated species.
In all experiments, a solid residue was recovered from the reactor after cooling (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6). Although the mass of the residue varied depending on the feedstock, its macroscopic appearance followed clear and reproducible patterns. Residues obtained from polyolefin-rich materials such as PP were typically minimal in quantity and appeared as fine, brittle black particles or thin carbonized films adhering to the reactor walls. Their morphology suggests advanced volatilisation of the PM and a high degree of thermal degradation, consistent with the low aromatic content of the PP oils.
In contrast, materials containing styrene, acrylonitrile, or ABS produced more substantial solid residues. These were generally dark brown to black and exhibited a porous, brittle structure. Such morphology is characteristic of partially carbonized PM matrices in which phenyl-containing segments undergo cross-linking and char formation during high T exposure. ABS-rich feedstocks produced residues with a more heterogeneous texture, often containing glossy fragments indicative of resolidified styrene-acrylonitrile domains mixed with more carbonized butadiene components. These observations align with the stronger aromatic signatures detected in corresponding liquid fractions.
Residues obtained from electronic P (keyboards, AiO) and PCB were more complex. Besides carbonaceous material, they often contained solid inclusions such as fillers, pigments, and inorganic fragments inherent to electronic waste streams. The residues were typically more rigid and irregularly shaped, occasionally showing metallic or mineral sheen. Their presence confirms that MD effectively volatilizes the organic fraction of such materials while leaving behind non-volatile components.
Textile feedstocks yielded residues that differed from both PM and electronic P. These residues were more fibrous, lighter in texture, and sometimes grayish rather than purely black. This appearance is consistent with the partial degradation of PE- or polyamide-based fabrics, in which depolymerization leads to both volatile oxygenated compounds, as seen in the FTIR spectra, and solid oligomeric fragments that resist full volatilisation under microwave heating.
Overall, the macroscopic form of the residues correlates strongly with PM chemistry. Polyolefins leave minimal residue, styrenic and ABS generate more structured carbonaceous solids, and heterogeneous electronic wastes yield mixed organic and inorganic residues. These trends support the spectroscopic interpretations of the oils and further illustrate how feedstock composition dictates not only the chemical nature of the volatile products but also the physical characteristics of non-condensable by-products.
Table 3 presents a comparative overview of main oil fractions for several feedstocks, focusing on the intensities and relative dominance of aliphatic, aromatic, and oxygenated bands. The table captures subtle differences between materials processed under the same microwave conditions, including the presence of unsaturated =C-H bands, characteristic aromatic fingerprints, and carbonyl contributions. Based on raw data, the yield of the main fraction (liquid fraction), η [mL/kg], was calculated from the respective feedstocks, according to formula:
η m f , X = V m f , X m X m L k g
where Vmf,X is the volume of the main fraction from feedstock X and mX is the mass of feedstock X.
The calculated spectral indices (ArI, CI and OHI), derived from the predefined integration windows described in Section 2.3, followed the same qualitative trends as the band-by-band interpretation presented above. PS- and PCB-derived oils exhibited the highest relative aromatic contribution (ArI), whereas PP oils showed the lowest aromaticity and the strongest aliphatic character. Textile-derived oils displayed the highest carbonyl and hydroxyl contributions (CI and OHI), consistent with their pronounced C=O and O-H bands. It should be emphasized that these indices are intended only as semi-quantitative descriptors supporting comparative interpretation; they are not used for absolute compositional determination due to band overlap and ATR-related matrix effects. Regarding the ABS drum batch, PP T2O, material ground in a shredder (Figure 9, Table 4):
The spectrum is dominated by aliphatic C-H bands (2955–2842 cm−1 and 1456/1377 cm−1), consistent with a material with a high proportion of hydrocarbon chains (typical of hydrocarbon oil matrices) [40]. There is no clearly visible strong C=O ester band around ~1743 cm−1. In this region, only a weak, broad maximum is visible around ~1735–1700 cm−1, which is more consistent with [41]:
  • a low content of carbonyl groups (e.g., oxidation products);
  • contribution of additives (e.g., dispersants) in the formulated oils.
The ~3075, ~1649 bands and the strong bands at 900–690 cm−1 indicate an unsaturated and/or aromatic component; positions at 900–690 cm−1 are classically attributed to OOP (out-of-plane) C-H deformations in aromatics, and the pattern around ~750 and ~700 cm−1 is sometimes associated with a monosubstituted ring [42]. The broad band at ~3358 cm−1 suggests trace O-H groups (moisture, alcohols, hydroperoxides/oxidation products). In pure hydrocarbon oils, the O-H signal is usually weak; its presence should be considered an indicator of contamination or oxidation or contact with polar material [41].
Regarding ABS drum batch, PP T2O, test no. 1 (Figure 9, Table 5):
The spectrum is dominated by aliphatic C-H bands (2956/2924/2871/2842 and 1455/1377 cm−1), consistent with a sample with a high proportion of hydrocarbon chains (typical of many oils) [40]. The presence of bands ~3074, ~1605/1495, and a strong system 900–690 cm−1 indicates an aromatic and/or unsaturated contribution [42]. Compared to the ABS drum batch, PP T2O sample, ABS drum, PP T2O shows a more pronounced band near ~1700 cm−1 and a broader O-H shifted to lower wavenumbers (~3237 cm−1). This can be cautiously considered as an indication of a higher proportion of polar components/oxidation products.
Regarding ABS drum batch, PP T2O, test no. 2 (Figure 9, Table 6):
The spectrum of the ABS drum, PP T2O, test no. 2 indicates a strong aliphatic component (very strong ν(C-H) in the range ~2953–2917 cm−1 and strong deformations ~1456 and very strong ~1376 cm−1) [40]. At the same time, features of unsaturation and/or aromatic contribution are present: a band at ~3067 cm−1, ring modes (~1601, ~1516, ~1493 cm−1) and a distinct C-H OOP region (900–650 cm−1) with a very strong maximum at ~888 cm−1 and strong bands around ~695–667 cm−1 [42]. In the carbonyl region (~1733–1678 cm−1), there is absorption of weak intensity; without a reference sample of the same formulation, no conclusions about oxidation processes can be drawn based on C=O alone.
Regarding ABS “mix” batch (Figure 10, Table 7):
In ABS “mix,” the dominant C=O ester band at ~1743 cm−1, which is characteristic of many esters (it is usually strong in such oils), is not observed [40]. The spectrum is, however, strongly “hydrocarbonic”: aliphatic C-H has a distinct aromatic contribution (900–650 cm−1). Such features are consistent with a hydrocarbon matrix (e.g., mineral oil/formulation with an aromatic component), but the exact class should not be determined based on FTIR alone without a reference sample. The sample is dominated by aliphatic bands (2956/2916/2871/2844 and 1456/1377 cm−1), typical of hydrocarbon/oil mixtures. Very strong bands in the region ~900–650 cm−1 (especially ~887, ~775 and ~697 cm−1) indicate a significant contribution of aromatic structures (OOP C-H vibrations) [45]. The lack of a strong C=O band ~1743 cm−1 suggests that this is a service oil, the carbonyl “oxidation” signal is not dominant (requires comparison with a standard).
ABS materials produced oils with a mixed aliphatic–aromatic character. In both ABS drum PP T2O and ABS mix batches, strong aliphatic stretching bands were accompanied by an extensive system of aromatic OOP bands between 900 and 690 cm−1, including characteristic maxima around 775 cm−1 and 697 cm−1. Compared with other feedstocks, ABS oils often contained a broader O-H envelope (3200–3400 cm−1) and low-intensity carbonyl bands near 1700 cm−1, which may indicate minor oxidation or the presence of polar additives found in ABS formulations. The mixed aromatic/aliphatic character is consistent with the expected behavior of styrenic blends such as ABS or related materials containing both aromatic and aliphatic domains. Nevertheless, FTIR does not uniquely resolve the specific blend composition or the relative contribution of individual copolymer segments.
Regarding PCB batch (Figure 11, Table 8):
The spectrum indicates a hydrocarbon matrix with C-H bands (ca. 2960–2870 cm−1), but at the same time, very strong aromatic bands (ca. 1595/1500 and a distinct 812/752/691 cm−1 pattern) suggest a significant contribution of an aromatic component in the sample [42]. The presence of absorption near ~1702 cm−1 (carbonyl region) may indicate compounds with a C=O group, which is often associated with oxidation products in operating oils [41]. The broad ~3327 cm−1 (O-H) band strengthens the hypothesis of the presence of polar components (moisture/oxidation products), but does not in itself determine the cause.
PCB oil displayed a prominent aromatic/unsaturated contribution, consistent with an aromatic-rich oil fraction typical of resin-containing feedstocks. Given the complex composition of PCB materials, contributions from resinous and flame-retarded components are plausible; however, FTIR does not enable unambiguous identification of specific resin systems or brominated species. Elemental/halogen analysis and GC-MS would be required for confirmation. The FTIR spectrum showed strong aromatic C-H OOP bands (900–650 cm−1), supported by aliphatic stretching modes. The absence of strong carbonyl bands suggests limited oxidation despite the heterogeneous and flame-retarded nature of PCBs.
Regarding keyboards batch (Figure 12, Table 9):
The spectrum clearly indicates a significant contribution of the aromatic component: strong ring bands (ca. 1495 cm−1) and a very strong system in the 900–650 cm−1 region (especially ~696–697 cm−1) [45]. An aliphatic bond (C-H at 2960–2850 cm−1 and 1456/1377 cm−1) is present, but not dominant as in typical “paraffin” oils [40]. The carbonyl region (~1740–1700 cm−1) is very weak, and the O-H band at 3600–3200 cm−1 is not prominent among the main spectral features; this does not support the thesis of strong oxidation or the presence of a large amount of esters; however, the evaluation of the oxidation trend requires comparison to the spectrum of a fresh reference sample of the same formulation [41].
Regarding AiO batch (Figure 13, Table 10):
The spectrum clearly indicates a significant contribution of the aromatic component: strong ring bands (e.g., 1596, 1495 cm−1) and a very strong system at 900–650 cm−1 (especially 697 and 691 cm−1). An aliphatic bond (C-H at 2962/2929 cm−1 and deformations around 1452/1363 cm−1) is present, but does not dominate as clearly as in typical paraffin samples [45]. The carbonyl region (~1700–1650 cm−1) is very weak, and the O-H band (3385 cm−1) is weak; this does not suggest strong oxidation in the sense of a clear increase in C=O [41].
Oils from keyboard housings and AiO showed strong aromatic contributions similar to PS oils but combined with a more evident aliphatic baseline. Spectra displayed ring-stretching bands at 1596–1495 cm−1, overlaid onto typical C-H aliphatic patterns. The region 900–650 cm−1 was strongly aromatic, with several intense peaks around 697 cm−1, 731 cm−1, and 776 cm−1. The combination of aromatic and aliphatic signatures aligns with the known PM composition of such components, which include styrene-based PM, polycarbonate blends, and ABS formulations.
Regarding the PS batch (Figure 14, Table 11):
The spectrum of the PS batch sample is dominated by aromatic signals, especially in the region 900–650 cm−1 (the strongest band is around 696 cm−1, strong around 776 cm−1). Such bands are typical of OOP C-H vibrations in aromatic structures. An aliphatic bond (C-H bands at 2960–2850 cm−1 and deformations around 1450/1376 cm−1) is present, but in this sample it has a smaller spectral contribution than the aromatic part [45]. The carbonyl region (~1705 cm−1) is very weak, and the O-H band (~3403 cm−1) is trace; on this basis, there is no evidence to support the conclusion that it is “strongly oxidized” [41].
The polystyrene batch exhibited the clearest aromatic signature. The main oil fraction was dominated by a strong and highly structured system of OOP aromatic C-H vibrations in the 900–650 cm−1 region, with the most intense band at ~696 cm−1. Aromatic ring-stretching bands near 1495 cm−1 further supported this interpretation. These features are consistent with the well-known aromatic character of PS-derived oils and with the formation of styrenic/aromatic species typically reported in PS depolymerization. However, FTIR alone does not allow direct identification of styrene or specific oligomers, confirmation would require GC-MS analysis. The relatively small contribution of aliphatic C-H stretching in this sample suggests that secondary cracking into lighter aliphatic hydrocarbons was limited, which is consistent with the high aromatic content expected from styrene-rich oils.
Regarding the PP batch (Figure 15, Table 12):
The spectrum of the sample obtained from PP indicates a hydrocarbon matrix with a significant aliphatic fraction (very strong C-H stretching: 2956 and 2925 cm−1, and deformations at 1456 and 1377 cm−1) [45]. At the same time, very strong OOP bands occur in the 900–650 cm−1 region (including 888 and 698 cm−1), which supports the conclusion of a noticeable contribution of aromatic/unsaturated structures [42]. The carbonyl region (~1800–1650 cm−1) does not show a strong maximum around ~1700 cm−1; consequently, there is no basis for speaking of a “significant increase in C=O” (oxidation) based on FTIR alone.
The PP batch produced an oil dominated by aliphatic chains, as expected from the structure of PP. Strong asymmetric and symmetric C-H stretching bands at 2956, 2925, 2872, and 2855 cm−1 were observed. Nevertheless, the PP oil also exhibited pronounced aromatic/unsaturated signatures, most notably intense bands at ~888 cm−1 and ~698 cm−1, consistent with the presence of unsaturated and/or aromatic structures in the product mixture. Such signals suggest the presence of unsaturated and/or aromatic structures in addition to the dominant aliphatic matrix expected from PP. The origin of these aromatic features (e.g., secondary aromatization versus contributions from additives or secondary reactions) cannot be resolved by FTIR alone and would require complementary molecular analysis.
Regarding textile batch, test no. 1 (Figure 16, Table 13):
Although the total volume of the main fraction was negligible, it was still sufficient to record FTIR spectra for qualitative assessment. Textile test no. 1 sample shows a clear presence of C=O carbonyl groups (strong bands around ~1703–1695 cm−1, with an additional band around ~1733 cm−1). In performance oils, the carbonyl region is often used as an indicator of oxidation, but similar bands can also result from formulation components (e.g., ester bases) [41]. Aliphatic C-H bands are visible (2960–2850 cm−1, 1450–1380 cm−1), consistent with the hydrocarbon matrix/-CH2- chains [40]. The region 900–650 cm−1 is very intense (e.g., ~758, ~732, ~699, ~684, ~678 cm−1), which confirms the presence of aromatic and/or unsaturated structures (OOP C-H vibrations) [42]. The fingerprint range (ca. 1300–900 cm−1) is distinct (e.g., ~1267, ~1230, ~1177, ~1105, ~1071, ~1020 cm−1) [44].
Regarding textile batch, test no. 2 (Figure 16, Table 14):
The spectrum of the textile sample, test no. 2, is characterized by the simultaneous presence of:
  • prominent O-H bands (ca. 3393–3307 cm−1);
  • a C=O carbonyl region (ca. 1703–1693 cm−1, additionally ~1733 cm−1).
This pattern may be consistent with the presence of oxygenated components or oxidation products, but a definitive analysis requires comparison to a fresh reference sample of the same formulation [41]. The 900–650 cm−1 region is very intense (many strong O-H bands), indicating a significant contribution from aromatic/unsaturated structures [42]. The aliphatic component (C-H at 2960–2850 cm−1 and C-H deformations) is present, but compared to the dominant aromatic and carbonyl region, it is not dominant [40].
Textile batches (test no. 1 and test no. 2) were chemically distinct from remaining oils. In addition to aliphatic C-H bands, these samples exhibited strong, broad O-H absorptions (3300–3390 cm−1) and pronounced carbonyl stretching around 1703–1693 cm−1. The coexistence of O-H and C=O bands indicates the presence of oxygenated compounds. This pattern may be consistent with polyester-derived components and/or oxidation processes; however, without reference materials and molecular-level analysis, the exact origin of these oxygenated species cannot be definitively assigned. Despite oxygenated features, these oils also showed intense aromatic OOP bands in the diagnostic 900–650 cm−1 region, indicating the formation of aromatic intermediates during depolymerization.
Textile oils were unique in simultaneously exhibiting aliphatic C-H bands, strong aromatic contributions, and pronounced carbonyl absorption near 1700 cm−1. This combination indicates that polyester components and other oxygenated PM underwent partial decomposition to yield oxygen-containing hydrocarbons, differentiating them from the largely oxygen-free oils of polyolefin origin.
A clear relationship was observed between PM origin and FTIR spectral characteristics. PS-rich inputs produced oils with dominant aromatic signals, particularly in the 900–650 cm−1 diagnostic region, where OOP C-H vibrations confirmed the presence of mono- and disubstituted aromatic structures. PP oils showed the strongest aliphatic contribution, as reflected by intense 2956–2850 cm−1 stretching bands and deformation modes near 1450/1375 cm−1. ABS materials produced mixed spectra combining both aliphatic and aromatic features, consistent with their styrene–acrylonitrile–butadiene composition.
Diagnostic FTIR bands were interpreted at the level of polymer families rather than individual compounds. Strong aliphatic C-H stretching and deformation bands (3000–2800 and ~1460/1375 cm−1) are characteristic of polyolefin-derived hydrocarbon matrices, whereas ring-mode bands (~1600–1500 cm−1) combined with structured C-H out-of-plane vibrations (900–690 cm−1) are typical of styrenic/aromatic polymers. However, these regions are prone to overlap in complex oil matrices, and therefore assignments remain qualitative.
Overall, FTIR analysis in this study serves not only for functional-group identification, but also for comparative assessment of aromatic vs. aliphatic dominance, relative oxidation trends, and feedstock-dependent chemical fingerprints under identical microwave conditions. While molecular-level speciation requires GC-MS or elemental analysis, FTIR provides robust, reproducible evidence of structural trends across different waste streams.
Across all investigated feedstocks, the main liquid fractions displayed spectral signatures characteristic of hydrocarbon oils. In every batch, FTIR spectra revealed a strong set of aliphatic C-H stretching bands between 2956 and 2850 cm−1, combined with deformation modes near 1450 cm−1 and 1375 cm−1, indicating the presence of long, saturated hydrocarbon chains typical of depolymerized polyolefins. Overall, FTIR results indicate that, despite the heterogeneity of the feedstocks, microwave heating predominantly generates oils with C-H matrices. However, the nature of the aromatic contributions differs substantially between materials.
Table 3 reinforces the trends observed earlier:
  • ABS oils contain a balanced mixture of aliphatic and aromatic bands. Their spectra typically show bands at ~3070 cm−1 and ~1600/1495 cm−1, indicating aromatic segments from styrene-acrylonitrile, combined with aliphatic chains from butadiene or other additives.
  • Keyboard and AiO batches show even stronger aromatic signatures, often with very intense signals around 697 cm−1 and related OOP deformations. This reflects the presence of high aromatic P (e.g., HIPS-like materials or ABS blends with enhanced styrene content).
  • PCB oils show mixed character but with a notably strong aromatic contribution. Occasional C=O bands (~1700 cm−1; present but not dominant) indicate partial oxidation or decomposition of resinous components present in PCB laminates.
Based on the relative intensity of aromatic ring bands (1605–1495 cm−1) and the structured OOP region (900–690 cm−1), supported by the calculated aromaticity index (ArI), aromatic contribution increases qualitatively along the sequence: PP < ABS < keyboards ≈ AiO < PCB. This trend reflects differences in the original polymer chemistry; however, it should be interpreted as a semi-quantitative comparison derived from FTIR band ratios rather than as an absolute compositional ranking. This trend reflects the underlying PM chemistry and demonstrates that MD preserves key features of PM backbones, especially for styrenic and aromatic P. The presence of oxygenated species in selected feedstocks highlights the influence of non-PM additives (resins, pigments, fillers) on decomposition pathways.
Beyond functional-group identification, FTIR enables semi-quantitative comparison of aromaticity, relative oxidation level (via carbonyl index), and the balance between saturated and unsaturated structures. Changes in relative intensity of predefined spectral windows provide insight into depolymerization pathways and differences between feedstocks, even when exact molecular species cannot be resolved. Thus, FTIR serves as a robust tool for comparative assessment of oil classes generated under identical processing conditions.
To avoid over-interpreting FTIR as a compound-specific tool, the comparative assessment below in Table 15 is presented as a relative (trend-based) ranking rather than absolute index values. The ranking is derived from relative prominence of predefined spectral windows: aliphatic C-H stretching (3000–2800 cm−1), aromatic ring region (1605–1495 cm−1) together with the diagnostic aromatic OOP region (900–690 cm−1), carbonyl region (1850–1650 cm−1), and hydroxyl region (3600–3200 cm−1). Due to band overlap and matrix/ATR effects, this approach is used only to support qualitative trends; compound-level confirmation requires complementary GC-MS and/or elemental analysis.
The trend-based ranking corroborates the qualitative band assignments discussed in Section 3.1: polyolefin-derived oils show the strongest aliphatic C-H contribution, styrenic/aromatic feedstocks show dominant aromatic OOP patterns, and textile-derived oils exhibit the most pronounced oxygenated features. Because several regions may overlap (e.g., ~1650–1640 cm−1 and 900–730 cm−1), this table is intended as a comparative descriptor rather than an absolute compositional measure.

3.2. Main Fractions Distillation Tests

Fractional distillation provided additional insight into the molecular composition of depolymerized oils by separating low-boiling aliphatic compounds from heavier aromatic and oxygenated species.
Table 16 summarizes the outcomes of fractional distillation performed on the main oil fractions. For each feedstock batch, it reports the volume of the low-boiling distillate (<250 °C), higher-boiling distillate (250–350 °C), the estimated gas fraction, and the relative contribution of each distillate to the original oil. It also records qualitative observations such as behavior during heating. The <250 °C fraction accounted for 39–67% of total oil depending on feedstock, while the 250–350 °C fraction represented 8–23%. This distribution suggests potential differentiation between fuel-range hydrocarbons and heavier aromatic-rich streams.
Increased residue formation limited to aromatic-rich oils, particularly those from ABS and PCB-containing feedstocks, produced slightly more residue in the boiling flask, consistent with their higher oligomer content. However, boiling-range classification alone does not provide molecular-level identification and should not be interpreted as equivalent to chromatographic characterization.
Regarding PS distillates (Figure 17):
PS distillates are characterized by a pronounced aromatic signature, with dominant OOP C–H vibrations in the 900–650 cm−1 region, consistent with the persistence of styrenic oligomers (particularly ~695 cm−1, strong ~692 cm−1, and prominent ~775 cm−1) [42]. An aliphatic component is present (C-H stretching 2963–2857 cm−1, deformations ~1450 and ~1377 cm−1), but it is not dominant relative to the aromatic region [40]. The carbonyl region (~1746 and ~1689 cm−1) is trace. Based on the FTIR spectrum, the extent of oxidative transformations cannot be reliably assessed.
Regarding PP distillates (Figure 18):
PP distillates spectra indicate a significant contribution of the aliphatic fraction (strong ν(C-H) bands in the range of ~2960–2850 cm−1 and 2916 cm−1, and deformations ~1456/1444 and ~1377 cm−1) [42]. At the same time, an aromatic/unsaturated contribution is present, as confirmed by ring-mode bands (~1600–1500 cm−1) and a distinct C-H OOP region (900–650 cm−1) with a very strong band at ca. 887 cm−1 and a very strong band at ca. 699–698 cm−1 [41]. No clearly dominant carbonyl C=O band was observed in the typical range of ~1723–1650 cm−1; therefore, no conclusion about oxidation is made based on this spectrum.
Regarding ABS drum distillates (Figure 19):
ABS drum distillates spectra are dominated by aromatic signals, particularly in the region 900–650 cm−1 (the strongest bands around 697–700 cm−1, strong around 776, 753 and 691 cm−1), and ring bands around ~1595 and ~1496 cm−1, typical of C-H OOP vibrations in aromatic structures [42]. An aliphatic component (C-H at 2957–2857 cm−1 and deformations 1450–1376 cm−1) is present but not dominant, consistent with a hydrocarbon matrix typical of oils [40]. The carbonyl region (ca. 1725–1700 cm−1) is very weak, so based on the spectrum alone there is no evidence to detect a significant “increase in C=O” (oxidation) [41].
Regarding keyboard distillates (Figure 20):
The spectra of keyboard distillates are dominated by aromatic signals, especially in the range 900–650 cm−1: a very strong band at ~696 cm−1 and strong bands at ~700 and ~776 cm−1 (C-H OOP vibrations), as well as a ring band at about 1495 cm−1 [42]. An aliphatic component (C-H stretching 2960–2850 cm−1 and deformations ~1450/1375 cm−1) is present, but relatively weak compared to the aromatic “signature” [40]. The carbonyl region (~1733–1705 cm−1) is weak [41].
Regarding AiO distillates (Figure 21):
The spectra of AiO distillates are dominated by aromatic signals in the region 900–650 cm−1, particularly a very strong band around 696 cm−1 and strong bands around 700, 776, and 691 cm−1, consistent with assignment to aromatic C-H OOP vibrations [42]. An aliphatic component (C-H stretching 2962–2857 cm−1, deformations ~1458–1377 cm−1) is present, but in these samples it does not dominate aromatic signals [40]. The carbonyl region (~1742–1687 cm−1) is trace. It is difficult to draw conclusions about oxidation based on a single spectrum [41].
Distillation behavior correlates strongly with the chemical profile of each feedstock: PP produces 60–70% of low-boiling, aliphatic fractions, whereas styrenic and P yield predominantly 250–350 °C fractions, consistent with higher aromatic content and lower volatility.
Regardless of feedstock type, the <250 °C distillates consistently exhibited a shift toward aliphatic hydrocarbons compared with the corresponding parent oils. The intensity of C-H stretching bands at 2956–2850 cm−1 typically increased relative to aromatic ring vibrations, indicating enrichment in saturated hydrocarbons. Aromatic OOP bands were still present but generally of reduced intensity, consistent with the removal of heavy aromatic oligomers into the higher boiling fraction.
The 250–350 °C fractions consistently exhibited stronger aromatic signatures. In the PS distillates, the aromatic system (900–690 cm−1) remained dominant, confirming that styrene dimers, trimers, and heavier aromatic structures boiled in this range. In ABS distillates, aromatic bands intensified relative to aliphatic components, reflecting the higher boiling points of aromatic oligomers and possible heteroatom-containing fragments originating from additives. Textile-heavy fractions retained strong C=O and O-H signatures, indicating persistence of oxygenated compounds in this boiling range.
Taken together, these observations show that fractional distillation effectively separates oils into two compositionally distinct fractions: a lighter, predominantly aliphatic fraction and a heavier, more aromatic and oxygenated fraction.
Several key patterns emerge:
  • PP oils produce the highest proportion of low-boiling (<250 °C) distillates, consistent with their aliphatic character and the presence of lighter linear and branched hydrocarbons.
  • PS oils show a more balanced distribution but with a distinct shift towards 250–350 °C fractions, reflecting heavier aromatic hydrocarbons and styrene oligomers.
  • ABS, keyboards and AiO oils generate significant amounts of high-boiling fractions, often accompanied by dark residues, indicating the presence of aromatic oligomers or decomposition products from P.

3.3. Comparative Interpretation Across Feedstocks

The comparative evaluation of all investigated feedstocks reveals systematic relationships between polymer structure, thermal response under MD, product distribution, and spectroscopic characteristics of the resulting oil products.
From a quantitative perspective, clear differences were observed in total yield and residue formation depending on polymer type. PS gives one of the highest yields; in contrast, PP generated slightly lower yields. Mixed-electronic P (ABS, keyboards, AiO, PCB) exhibited intermediate behavior, reflecting their heterogeneous composition and/or the presence of additives or fillers. Textile feedstock showed increased formation of oxygenated fractions, consistent with partial contribution of polyester-type components and secondary reactions.
FTIR analysis confirms that product composition closely follows the structural features of the original polymer matrix. PS oil exhibited intense aromatic OOP C–H bending bands (900–650 cm−1), indicating preservation of styrenic structural motifs and formation of aromatic-rich fractions. In contrast, PP oils were dominated by strong aliphatic C–H stretching bands (2956–2850 cm−1) with comparatively weaker aromatic signals, consistent with chain scission of saturated polyolefin backbones. ABS and mixed WEEE P displayed combined aliphatic–aromatic profiles, reflecting simultaneous degradation of styrenic and aliphatic domains. Textile oils showed additional carbonyl contributions, suggesting partial oxidation or decomposition of oxygen-containing polymer structures.
Diagnostic FTIR features were interpreted in terms of polymer families rather than specific compounds. Intense aliphatic bands at 2956–2850 cm−1 with deformation modes near 1460/1375 cm−1 are typical of hydrocarbon matrices and are consistent with polyolefin-derived oils; however, PE/PP cannot be unambiguously discriminated by FTIR alone. Aromatic contributions were inferred from ring-mode bands near 1600–1500 cm−1 together with the structured C-H OOP region (900–690 cm−1), which is characteristic of styrenic/aromatic polymer backbones (e.g., PS/SAN/ABS/HIPS), yet similar patterns may also arise from aromatic additives or secondary aromatization. Oxygenated features (C=O at ~1850–1650 cm−1 and O-H at 3600–3200 cm−1) may indicate oxidation products, ester-containing constituents, or polar additives; without reference oils and molecular-level analysis, assignments remain qualitative. Several bands (e.g., ~1650–1640 cm−1) may contain overlapping contributions from C=C stretching and H-O-H bending; therefore, interpretation was made contextually and in combination with adjacent diagnostic regions.
Overall, FTIR analysis demonstrates that microwave treatment of heterogeneous polymeric feedstocks produces oils dominated by hydrocarbon functional groups, with varying relative contributions of aliphatic, aromatic, and oxygenated structures depending on the original material. The technique clearly differentiates polyolefin-like, styrenic/aromatic-rich, and oxygen-containing oil profiles at the functional-group level. However, due to spectral overlap and the complexity of formulated polymer systems, FTIR is not sufficient for compound-level identification. Complementary GC-MS and elemental analyses are required to fully validate the proposed compositional trends.
A clear relationship was observed between feedstock origin and FTIR spectral characteristics. Polyolefin-derived oils (e.g., PP) showed dominant aliphatic C-H stretching (2956–2850 cm−1) and deformation bands (~1450/1375 cm−1), typical of saturated hydrocarbon matrices [40]. In contrast, PS-rich inputs produced oils with dominant aromatic features, particularly in the diagnostic 900–690 cm−1 region, where structured C-H out-of-plane vibrations confirmed the presence of aromatic ring systems [42]. ABS and related materials generated mixed spectra combining both aliphatic and aromatic signatures, consistent with styrenic blends containing both saturated and aromatic domains.
Across all investigated feedstocks, the main liquid fractions displayed functional-group signatures characteristic of hydrocarbon oils, with varying relative contributions of aliphatic, aromatic, and oxygenated structures. The calculated semi-quantitative indices (ArI, CI, OHI) indicate that aromatic contribution increases qualitatively along the sequence: PP < ABS < keyboards ≈ AiO < PCB. This trend reflects differences in the original polymer chemistry and formulation. The calculated ArI values increased progressively from polyolefin-derived oils to styrenic and PCB-derived fractions, consistent with the relative intensity of aromatic ring and OOP bands. CI and OHI values remained low for polyolefin samples and were elevated only in textile-derived oils, reflecting the presence of oxygen-containing species. Numerical index values are consistent with qualitative spectral interpretation.
It should be emphasized that FTIR provides functional-group level information and that several spectral regions (notably 1600–1500 cm−1 and 900–690 cm−1) may be affected by band overlap in complex oil matrices. Therefore, the above ranking represents a semi-quantitative comparison based on predefined integration windows rather than an absolute compositional determination.
While FTIR clearly differentiates between predominantly aliphatic, aromatic-rich, and oxygenated oil profiles, compound-level identification and verification of specific molecular products require complementary techniques such as GC-MS and elemental analysis.
Because FTIR provides functional-group level information, compound-level identification of volatile and liquid products requires complementary techniques such as GC-MS of the gas/liquid fractions and elemental analysis (including halogens where relevant). The present conclusions therefore refer to functional-group trends rather than definitive molecular speciation.
Distillation behavior further differentiates the feedstocks: the <250 °C fraction accounted for a substantial portion of total oil in polyolefin and PS samples, indicating the formation of relatively low-molecular-weight hydrocarbons; the 250–350 °C fraction was more pronounced in aromatic-rich systems and in mixed-electronic P, suggesting the presence of heavier oligomeric or condensed aromatic structures.
The results demonstrate that MD preserves key structural signatures of the original polymers while modifying product distribution through feedstock-dependent thermal and chemical pathways. The consistency between FTIR fingerprints and distillation profiles supports the internal coherence of the dataset and confirms that polymer chemistry remains the primary determinant of product characteristics under applied microwave conditions.

4. Conclusions

Based on the experiments performed, quarter-scale MD was able to convert heterogeneous postconsumer P into liquid hydrocarbon products, although some variability between runs was observed. All tested materials, ranging from commodity P such as PP, PS, ABS, keyboards, PCBs, and textiles, yielded liquid fractions dominated by aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons in proportions characteristic of their PM origin. FTIR analysis consistently showed that polyolefin oils were predominantly aliphatic, styrenic materials produced strongly aromatic oils with clear ring substitution patterns, and ABS or electronics-derived feedstocks resulted in mixed aliphatic–aromatic compositions. Textile oils exhibited additional carbonyl and O-H bands, suggesting pathways involving oxygenated intermediates.
Microwave heating enabled rapid depolymerization, producing oils with broadly similar spectral fingerprints across repeated tests, confirming the stability of the process. Fractional distillation further revealed that low-boiling fractions (<250 °C) were dominated by aliphatic hydrocarbons, whereas higher-boiling fractions (250–350 °C) contained more aromatic or oxygenated components, highlighting the molecular diversity of the derived oils.
Metallic components probably pass mainly to the solid residue, while halogen ones to the liquid phase, but verification of this thesis would require further analysis in future studies.
While the process proved technically viable across a broad range of waste streams, its performance remains dependent on reactor configuration and feed heterogeneity, which should be addressed in future scale-up studies. The consistency of the spectral trends across diverse P provides a foundation for future process optimization, particularly for scaling up to pilot and industrial reactors where feed heterogeneity and heating uniformity remain critical engineering challenges.
Future work should complement FTIR-based characterization with chromatographic and elemental analyses, and incorporate more precise gas quantification and energy balances to fully assess the techno-economic potential and environmental performance of the process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.K.; methodology, J.K. and W.K.; software, A.P., B.S., J.K. and W.K.; validation, A.P.; formal analysis, A.P. and B.S.; investigation, A.P. and W.K.; resources, W.K.; data curation, A.P., W.K. and B.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.P.; writing—review and editing, J.K. and M.K.; visualization, A.P.; supervision, J.K. and M.K.; project administration, M.K.; funding acquisition, M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the entire Eco Harpoon community who directly and indirectly contributed to the research and its publication.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Andrzej Piotrowicz, Janusz Kolczyński, Mirosław Kostrzewa, Wojciech Kaczmarek were employed by the company Eco Harpoon Recycling Sp. z o.o. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
Pplastic(s)
MDmicrowave assisted depolymerization
PMpolymer(s)
PEpolyethylene
PSpolystyrene
PPpolypropylene
PETpolyethylene terephthalate
LDPElow-density polyethylene
BHETbis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate
PVCpolyvinyl chloride
MSWmunicipal solid waste
PCBprinted circuit board
AiO“all-in-one”, a specific computer in which all the components necessary for operation are located in the monitor housing
TFTtype of display found in monitors and laptops screens
ABSacrylonitrile butadiene styrene
IRinfrared spectroscopy
OOPout-of-plane
σstandard deviation

References

  1. Geyer, R.; Jambeck, J.R.; Law, K.L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. López, A.; Marco, I.; Caballero, B.M.; Laresgoiti, M.F.; Adrados, A. Pyrolysis of municipal plastic wastes: Influence of raw material composition. Waste Manag. 2010, 30, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ragaert, K.; Delva, L.; Van Geem, K. Mechanical and chemical recycling of solid plastic waste. Waste Manag. 2017, 69, 24–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hopewell, J.; Dvorak, R.; Kosior, E. Plastics recycling: Challenges and opportunities. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 2115–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, R.K.; Ruj, B. Time and temperature depended fuel gas generation from pyrolysis of real world municipal plastic waste. Fuel 2016, 174, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, F.; Wang, B.; Yang, D.; Hao, J.; Qiao, Y.; Tian, Y. Thermal degradation of typical plastics under high heating rate conditions by TG-FTIR: Pyrolysis behaviors and kinetic analysis. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 171, 1106–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Metaxas, A.C.; Meredith, R.J. Industrial Microwave Heating; IET: London, UK, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sutton, D.; Kelleher, B.; Ross, J.R.H. Review of Literature on Catalysts for Biomass Gasification. Fuel Process. Technol. 2001, 73, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chang-yuan, T.; Zhi, L.; Zuo-hua, L.; Jun, D. Microwave-assisted degradation of poly ethylene terephthalate under mild conditions. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 2007, 14, 453–457. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jones, D.A.; Lelyveld, T.P.; Mavrofidis, S.D.; Kingman, S.W.; Miles, N.J. Microwave heating applications in environmental engineering—A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2002, 34, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aishwarya, K.N.; Sindhu, N. Microwave Assisted Pyrolysis of Plastic Waste. Procedia Technol. 2016, 25, 990–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Menéndez, J.A.; Arenillas, A.; Fidalgo, B.; Fernández, Y.; Zubizarreta, L.; Calvo, E.G.; Bermúdez, J.M. Microwave heating processes involving carbon materials. Fuel Process. Technol. 2010, 91, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mortezaeikia, V.; Tavakoli, O. Understanding the kinetics of waste plastic catalytic pyrolysis under microwave irradiation for enhanced resource valorization. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 500, 157228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Menéndez, J.A.; Inguanzo, M.; Pis, J.J. Microwave-induced pyrolysis of sewage sludge. Water Res. 2002, 36, 3261–3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lam, S.S.; Mahari, W.A.W.; Jusoh, A.; Chong, C.T.; Lee, C.L.; Chase, H.A. Pyrolysis using microwave absorbents as reaction bed: An improved approach to transform used frying oil into biofuel product with desirable properties. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 147, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Islam, K.M.O.; Ahmad, N.; Ummer, A.C.; Ahmed, U.; Siddiqui, M.N.; Millan, M.; Jameel, A.G.A. Microwave-Assisted pyrolysis of waste plastics: A comprehensive review on process parameters, catalysts, and future prospects. Results Eng. 2025, 26, 105571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zolghadr, A.; Sidhu, N.; Mastalski, I.; Facas, G.; Maduskar, S.; Uppili, S.; Go, T.; Neurock, M.; Dauenhauer, P.J. On the Method of Pulse-Heated Analysis of Solid Reactions (PHASR) for Polyolefin Pyrolysis. ChemSusChem 2020, 14, 4214–4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Russell, A.D.; Antreou, E.I.; Lam, S.S.; Ludlow-Palafox, C.; Chase, H.A. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of HDPE using an activated carbon bed. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 6756–6760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Felix, M.S.; Hagare, D.; Tahmasebi, A.; Sathasivan, A.; Arora, M. Microwave pyrolysis of polypropylene, and high-density polyethylene, and catalytic gasification of waste coffee pods to hydrogen-rich gas. Waste Manag. 2024, 187, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. de Marco, P.; Poletto, M. Microwave assisted pyrolysis of expanded polystyrene waste using carbon black catalyst. Res. Soc. Dev. 2022, 11, e518111134058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rex, P.; Masilamani, I.P.; Miranda, L. Microwave pyrolysis of polystyrene and polypropylene mixtures using different activated carbon from biomass. J. Energy Inst. 2020, 93, 1819–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Undri, A.; Frediani, M.; Rosi, L.; Frediani, P. Reverse polymerization of waste polystyrene through microwave assisted pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014, 105, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Karkanis, S.F.; Karetsou, N.G.; Achilias, D.S. Efficient Microwave-Assisted Glycolysis of PET Fiber Waste: Optimization, Products Analysis, and BHET Recovery for Sustainable Recycling. ChemistrySelect 2025, 10, e00718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guo, B.; Lopez-Lorenzo, X.; Fang, Y.; Backstrom, E.; Capezza, A.J.; Vanga, S.R.; Furó, I.; Hakkarainen, M.; Syrén, P.O. Fast Depolymerization of PET Bottle Mediated by Microwave Pre-Treatment and An Angineered PETase. ChemSusChem 2023, 16, e202300742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kumar, K.; Yadav, O.; Palla, V.C.S.; Busigari, R.R. Catalytic microwave conversion of LDPE-PET waste: Unravelling the influence of process parameters. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2025, 204, 108039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nguyen, P.N.D. Pyrolysis of PVC Medical Plastic Wastes by Microwave Dielectric Heating. Master’s Thesis, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yu, H.; Qu, J.; Liu, Y.; Yun, H.; Li, X.; Zhou, C.; Jin, Y.; Zhang, C.; Dai, J.; Bi, X. Co-pyrolysis of biomass and polyvinyl chloride under microwave irradiation: Distribution of chlorine. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 150903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Stallkamp, C.; Hennig, M.; Volk, R.; Stapf, D.; Schultmann, F. Pyrolysis of mixed engineering plastics: Economic challenges for automotive plastic waste. Waste Manag. 2024, 176, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. NETL. Microwave-Assisted Conversion of Plastic to Hydrogen and Carbon. U.S. Patent 2023-0242825 A1, 3 August 2023. [Google Scholar]
  30. Frediani, P.; Frediani, M. Mixed or contaminated Waste Plastic Recycling through Microwave—Assisted Pyrolysis. In Recent Perspectives in Pyrolysis Research; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cabrera, P.A.R.; Perez, A.S.L.; Fajardo, C.A.G. Design of a Semi-Continuous Microwave System for Pretreatment of Microwave-Assisted Pyrolysis Using a Theoretical Method. Inventions 2025, 10, 24. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yan, L.; Wang, C.; Yin, X. A Review of Methods for Improving Microwave Heating Uniformity. Microwave 2025, 1, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Siddique, I.J.; Salema, A.A.; Antunes, E.; Vinu, R. Technical challenges in scaling up the microwave technology for biomass processing. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 153, 111767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, N. Scailing Up Catalytic Microwave-Assisted Pyrolysis for Energy Production from Biomass and Plastic Wastes. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  35. Adam, M.; Juliano, K.; Robinson, J.; Kingman, S. Developing a Microwave Fluidised Bed Process for Biomass Pyrolysis. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Microwave and High Frequency Heating, Cracow, Poland, 14–17 September 2015. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rajpurohit, D.S.; Chhibber, R. Design of Multimode Microwave Cavity for Materials Processing. In Proceedings of the 5th International & 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR 2014); Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati: Guwahati, India, 2014; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  37. Richter, F.; Rein, G. The Role of Heat Transfer Limitations in Polymer Pyrolysis at the Microscale. Front. Mech. Eng. 2018, 4, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Buttress, A.; Hargreaves, G.; Ilchev, A.; Monti, T.; Sklavounou, A.; Katrib, J.; Martin-Tanchereau, P.; Unthank, M.; Irvine, D.; Dodds, C. Design and optimization of a microwave reactor for kilo-scale polymer synthesis. Chem. Eng. Sci. X 2019, 2, 100022. [Google Scholar]
  39. Giordano, V.; Castagnoli, A.; Pecorini, I.; Chiarello, F. Identifying technologies in circular economy paradigm through text mining on scientific literature. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0312709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Han, J.; Sun, R.; Zeng, X.; Zhang, J.; Xing, R.; Sun, C.; Chen, Y. Rapid Classification and Quantification of Camellia (Camellia oleifera Abel.) Oil Blended with Rapeseed Oil Using FTIR-ATR Spectroscopy. Molecules 2020, 25, 2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shinde, H.M.; Bewoor, A.K. Evaluating petrol engine oil deterioration through oxidation and nitration parameters by low-cost IR sensor. Appl. Petrochem. Res. 2020, 10, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shurvell, H.F. Spectra-Structure Correlations Spectra-Structure Correlations in the Mid-and Far-infrared. Handb. Vib. Spectrosc. 2006, 3, 1783–1816. [Google Scholar]
  43. Guillén, M.D.; Cabo, N. Usefulness of the frequency data of the Fourier transform infrared spectra to evaluate the degree of oxidation of edible oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wolak, A.; Krasodomski, W.; Zajac, G. FTIR analysis and monitoring of used synthetic oils operated under similar driving conditions. Friction 2020, 8, 995–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Coates, J. Interpretation of Infrared Spectra, A Practical Approach. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Depolymerization installation scheme: (a)—front view with systems: purge, reactor and batch material loading, temperature measurement, heating, electrical connections; (b)—rear view with systems: safety relief outlet, liquid-product cooling, gaseous-product outlet.
Figure 1. Depolymerization installation scheme: (a)—front view with systems: purge, reactor and batch material loading, temperature measurement, heating, electrical connections; (b)—rear view with systems: safety relief outlet, liquid-product cooling, gaseous-product outlet.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g001
Figure 2. Images from thermal imaging cameras: (a) max. 187 °C; (b) max. 237 °C—test with ABS drum batch, PP T2O.
Figure 2. Images from thermal imaging cameras: (a) max. 187 °C; (b) max. 237 °C—test with ABS drum batch, PP T2O.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g002
Figure 3. Condensation of the gaseous fraction (a), main fraction with (b) and without condensate (c) in the receiver—PS batch.
Figure 3. Condensation of the gaseous fraction (a), main fraction with (b) and without condensate (c) in the receiver—PS batch.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g003
Figure 4. Batch before (a) and after (b,c) the process—PS batch.
Figure 4. Batch before (a) and after (b,c) the process—PS batch.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g004
Figure 5. Batch before (a) and after (b,c) the process—keyboards batch.
Figure 5. Batch before (a) and after (b,c) the process—keyboards batch.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g005
Figure 6. Batch before (a) and after (b,c) the process—PCB batch.
Figure 6. Batch before (a) and after (b,c) the process—PCB batch.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g006
Figure 7. Condensation of the gaseous fraction (a), main fraction with condensate (b)—textile batch.
Figure 7. Condensation of the gaseous fraction (a), main fraction with condensate (b)—textile batch.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g007
Figure 8. Condensation of the gaseous fraction (a), main fraction with (b) and without condensate (c) in the receiver—ABS drum batch, PP T2O, material ground in a shredder.
Figure 8. Condensation of the gaseous fraction (a), main fraction with (b) and without condensate (c) in the receiver—ABS drum batch, PP T2O, material ground in a shredder.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g008
Figure 9. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—ABS drum batch, PP T2O. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Figure 9. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—ABS drum batch, PP T2O. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g009
Figure 10. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—ABS “mix” batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Figure 10. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—ABS “mix” batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g010
Figure 11. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—PCB batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Figure 11. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—PCB batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g011
Figure 12. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—keyboard batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Figure 12. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—keyboard batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g012
Figure 13. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—AiO batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Figure 13. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—AiO batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g013
Figure 14. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—PS batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Figure 14. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—PS batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g014
Figure 15. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—PP batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Figure 15. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—PP batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g015
Figure 16. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—textile batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Figure 16. FTIR spectrum for main fraction—textile batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g016
Figure 17. FTIR spectrum for distillates—PS batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Figure 17. FTIR spectrum for distillates—PS batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g017
Figure 18. FTIR spectrum for distillates—PP batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Figure 18. FTIR spectrum for distillates—PP batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g018
Figure 19. FTIR spectrum for distillates—ABS drum batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Figure 19. FTIR spectrum for distillates—ABS drum batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g019
Figure 20. FTIR spectrum for distillates—keyboards batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Figure 20. FTIR spectrum for distillates—keyboards batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g020
Figure 21. FTIR spectrum for distillates—AiO batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Figure 21. FTIR spectrum for distillates—AiO batch. Source: authors’ own measurements.
Cleantechnol 08 00044 g021
Table 2. Dependence of the T inside the reactor chamber on the registered energy consumption on the magnetron—test with PS batch.
Table 2. Dependence of the T inside the reactor chamber on the registered energy consumption on the magnetron—test with PS batch.
T, °C30120200210
energy consumption, kWh0.150.83.74.1
Table 3. Measured parameters, observations and comments—all MD tests.
Table 3. Measured parameters, observations and comments—all MD tests.
Batch MaterialNo. of TestsTotal Load QuantityTotal Amount of Main FractionProcess ConditionsYield of Main Fraction, ηmf,XObservations and Comments
kg, ±0.001mL, ±10 mLMax. TTotal DurationDuration Reach the Max. TmL/kg
°C, ±1 degmin
PS927.000
(3.000 × 9)
25,250200185ND935- after 15 min, gas appeared in condenser
- after 25 min, main fraction occurred in condenser
PP26.000
(3.000 × 2)
4450205190115742- after 15 min, gas appeared in condenser
- after 20 min, main fraction occurred in condenser
- main fraction is inhomogeneous (different fractions, suspension)
AiO13.0002700210140110900- after 10 min, gas appeared in condenser
- after 25 min, main fraction occurred in condenser
- main fraction is partially clear, with suspension
ABS drum, PP T2O26.0003420240260170
(70: 150 °C)
570 There was a noticeable amount of carbon residue left in the reactor (greasy, loose and dusty).two magnetrons, with starting power 675 W for each, gradually (in seven moves) increased in power to 1550 W
ABS drum, PP T2O, material ground in a shredder13.0002410215320150
(10: 40 °C)
803- after 10 min (40 °C), gas appeared in condenser
- after 195 min, no more gases appear in condenser
- after 320 min, no more main fraction occurred in condenser
ABS “mix”13.0003450235180ND1150
PCB13.000negligible20014090-- after 10 min, gas appeared in condenser
- after 30 min, main fraction occurred
- after 65 min, no more gases appear in condenser
- after 130 min, no more main fraction occurred in condenser
Residual PCB did not completely disintegrate after the process, but it is brittle.
keyboards14.600
in five charges
4050185180140880- after 10 min, gas appeared in condenser
- homogenous main fraction, no suspension
Residues are brittle and dust-free.
textiles no. 111.000300185300ND300- intense gases in the initial phase of the process, gradual decrease in gas intensity after approx. 2 hr of the process,
- unpleasant odor
After opening the loading window and mixing the residue—spontaneous ignition of the solid residue.
textiles no. 212.000negligible195210ND-- after 10 min, there was “a blench” from the reactor
- after 30 min, gas appeared in condenser
- sudden increase in gas intensity in condenser at 50 °C
- after the process was completed, it was necessary to clean the reactor outlet and the gas discharge hose because they were clogged
- there was a lot of solidified, sticky material in the condenser
Table 4. FTIR spectrum interpretation—ABS drum batch, PP T2O, material ground in a shredder (based on [40,41,42,43,44,45]).
Table 4. FTIR spectrum interpretation—ABS drum batch, PP T2O, material ground in a shredder (based on [40,41,42,43,44,45]).
Position (cm−1)Intensity (Descriptive)Assignment (Most Typical)Interpretive Commentary
~3358medium, wideO-H stretching (water/alcohols/
hydroperoxides)
A wide band suggests a polar component or trace moisture/
oxidation products; may be weak in pure hydrocarbon oils.
2955, 2916, 2871, 2842from medium
to very strong
C-H stretching: CH3/CH2 (aliphatic chains)aliphatic fraction (long chains) typical of many mineral oils
~1649mediumC=C stretching (alkenes/aromatics) or
H-O-H bend (when water)
In the oil matrix, more often associated with unsaturation/aromaticity than with water (if no other strong water bands are present).
1456, 1377strongCH2 scissoring (~1465), CH3
bending (~1375)
very typical for aliphatic mixtures
~972medium=C-H OOP vibrations (alkenes)/
oxidation components reported in
references
The literature on engine oils indicates the usefulness of
around 970 cm−1 in the context of changes during oxidation
(depending on the system).
887, 775, 728, 697, 676from medium
to very strong
aromatic C-H OOP (900–690 cm−1);
for monosubstitution typically strong bands ~750 and ~700
The band pattern in the 900–690 cm−1 region is diagnostic for
aromatics and substitution type; visible strong components
at ~697 and ~775 (and others) support aromatic contribution.
Table 5. FTIR spectrum interpretation—ABS drum batch, PP T2O, test no. 1 (based on [40,42]).
Table 5. FTIR spectrum interpretation—ABS drum batch, PP T2O, test no. 1 (based on [40,42]).
Position (cm−1)Intensity (Descriptive)Assignment (Most Typical)Interpretive Commentary
~3237 (wide)mediumO-H stretching (water/water/alcohols/hydroperoxides)Broad and shifted towards lower wavenumbers O-H is sometimes associated with a stronger hydrogen bond (e.g., oxidation products).
~3074medium=C-H stretching (alkenes/aromatics)confirms an unsaturated (or aromatic) bond
2956very strongν(C-H) CH3 (asym.)dominance of the aliphatic fraction
2924 and ~2917strongν(C-H) CH2 (asym., maximum ~2922–2925)typical of long hydrocarbon chains
2871strongν(C-H) CH3 (sym.)typical for aliphatic mixtures
2842mediumν(C-H) CH2 (sym., ~2850)confirmation of long chains
~1697mediumweak C=O (oxidation) or contribution of ring bands/conjugated systemsIn operating oils, the carbonyl region is diagnostic; absorption is visible near 1700 cm−1, which may indicate possible oxidation products.
~1649mediumC=C stretching (alkenes/aromatics)unsaturated (or aromatic) bond
~1605 and ~1495mediumaromatic ring vibrations (C=C)/deformationsaromatic bonding
1455strongδ(CH2) scissoring (~1465)classic aliphatic band
1377strongδ(CH3) bending (~1375)
1276mediumfingerprint area: C-C/C-O, possible addition of additives
1177, 1107, 1071, 1026weak/mediumfingerprint (C-C/C-O; complex vibrations)Formulated oils may contain additives or aging products.
990–965mediumvibrations related to unsaturation (=C-H)/“oil” componentsAccording to the literature, changes in this area may accompany aging (contextual interpretation).
887.5very strongC-H OOP (alkenes/aromatics)The strong band in the 900–690 cm−1 region is typical for aromatics; details of the pattern confirm the presence of a ring.
775.8; 728.8; 712.8; 696.8; 676strong/very strongC-H OOP (aromatics) and rocking CH2 (~722–730)The pattern of 900–690 cm−1 is diagnostic for aromatics; at the same time ~722–730 cm−1 is characteristic for long chains (CH2 rocking).
Table 6. FTIR spectrum interpretation—ABS drum batch, PP T2O, test no. 2 (based on [40,41,42,45]).
Table 6. FTIR spectrum interpretation—ABS drum batch, PP T2O, test no. 2 (based on [40,41,42,45]).
Position (cm−1)Intensity (Descriptive)Assignment (Most Typical)Interpretive Commentary
2953; 2917very strongν(C-H) CH3/CH2 (asym.)strong aliphatic component (typical of a carbon-hydrogen matrix)
2871strongν(C-H) CH3/CH2 (sym.)confirms the presence of -CH2-/-CH3 fragments.
2843mediumν(C-H) (sym., mainly CH2)band consistent with the presence of aliphatic chains.
1650mediumC=C (alkenes/conjugated systems; general)unsaturation/conjugated band; no specific compound identified
1601mediumaromatic ring vibrations (ring modes)supports the aromatic contribution in the spectrum.
1456; 1444strongδ(CH2)/δ(CH3) (C-H deformations)characteristic hydrocarbon bands; possible overlap
1424mediumC-H deformations (general; mixtures)auxiliary band, nonspecific
1376very strongδ(CH3) bending (~1375)clear contribution of methyl groups
1295; 1267; 1230medium/weakfingerprint area (complex vibrations; general assignments)stripes in the fingerprint area; general interpretation
1171; 1168weak/medium
998medium
972medium
902mediumC-H OOP (aromatics/alkenes; general)supports unsaturated/aromatic input.
888very strongvery clear band in the OOP area
842; 836; 817; 812mediumaromatic C-H OOP (substitution dependent)a set of bands supporting an aromatic interpretation
782; 766; 756; 739mediumaromatic C-H OOPin the aroma diagnostic area
728; 715strongCH2 rocking (~720–730) and/or layering with aromatic OOPtypical range for longer -CH2- sequences; overlapping bands possible
695; 693strongaromatic C-H OOPstrong aromatic contribution in the 900–650 cm−1 region
675; 674strongadditional intense bands in the aromatic area
667mediumaccompanying band in the diagnostic area
Table 7. FTIR spectrum interpretation—ABS “mix” batch (based on [41,42,43,44,45]).
Table 7. FTIR spectrum interpretation—ABS “mix” batch (based on [41,42,43,44,45]).
Position (cm−1)Intensity (Descriptive)Assignment (Most Typical)Interpretive Commentary
2956, 2916, ~2871, ~2844very strong/strongC-H stretching CH3/CH2aliphatic fraction (hydrocarbon chains), typical of oils
~1649–1650mediumC=C stretching (alkenes/aromatics)In hydrocarbon oils, they are often associated with an unsaturated/aromatic bond (no strong C=O).
~1495mediumaromatic ring vibrations/C-H deformationsconfirms the presence of an aromatic ingredient
1456, 1377strongδ(CH2) scissoring; δ(CH3) bendingtypical “oil” (aliphatic) bands
~990 and ~973–965medium/weakvibrations related to non-saturation (=C-H)/“fingerprint”auxiliary region; interpretation dependent on matrix and additives
~906 and 887strong/very strongaromatic C-H OOP (900–650)very clear aromatic signal in the diagnostic region 900–650 cm−1
775 and ~697 (and ~729/740)very strong/mediumaromatic C-H OOP; ~722–730 also
CH2 rocking
The arrangement of ~690–710 and ~730–770 cm−1 is often observed for an aromatic ring (often also in the context of monosubstitution), and ~722–730 cm−1 is typical for long CH2 chains (rocking).
Table 8. FTIR spectrum interpretation—PCB batch (based on [41,42,43,44,45]).
Table 8. FTIR spectrum interpretation—PCB batch (based on [41,42,43,44,45]).
Position (cm−1)Intensity (Descriptive)Assignment (Most Typical)Interpretive Commentary
~3327medium, wideO-H stretching (water/water/alcohols/hydroperoxides)Presence of polar components or oxidation products; broad band, consistent with hydrogen bonding.
~2961; ~2957mediumν(C-H) CH3/CH2 (asym.)Aliphatic bands typical of a hydrocarbon matrix; here less dominant than aromatic ones 900–650 cm−1.
~2871mediumν(C-H) CH3 (sym.)Typical aliphatic band; supports the aliphatic fraction.
~1702mediumC=O (carbonyl region: ketones/acids/aldehydes/esters)in operating oils, the 1800–1650 cm−1 region is sometimes diagnostic for oxidation; the presence of the band may indicate carbonyl compounds.
~1595strongC=C aromatic ringaromatic ring
~1500strongC=C/aromatic ring vibrationsConfirms the presence of an aromatic ingredient.
~1473mediumδ(CH2)/δ(CH3) (C-H deformations) + possible aromatic overlapRegion susceptible to superposition; general interpretation (aliphatic deformations).
~1365mediumδ(CH3) bending (~1375)typical for the aliphatic fraction
~1168weak/mediumfingerprint: C-C/C-O (additives/aging products may also contribute)The attribution remains cautious; possible contribution of additives or degradation products.
~1071weak/mediumfingerprint: C-C/C-O
~885medium/strongC-H OOP (aromats/alkenes)confirmation of the presence of aromas
~812strongaromatic C-H OOP (substitution type)The 900–690 cm−1 region is diagnostic of aromas; a strong band supports the aromatic contribution.
~752strongaromatic C-H OOPThe band pattern at 900–690 cm−1 suggests a significant contribution of aromatic structures.
~722weak/mediumCH2 rocking (long sequences -CH2-)Possible contribution of long chains; in this sample the 900–650 cm−1 region is dominated by aromatics, so assignment requires caution.
~691strongaromatic C-H OOPstrong aromatic bond in the diagnostic area
Table 9. FTIR spectrum interpretation—keyboards batch (based on [41,45]).
Table 9. FTIR spectrum interpretation—keyboards batch (based on [41,45]).
Position (cm−1)Intensity (Descriptive)Assignment (Most Typical)Interpretive Commentary
~1495strongC=C aromatic ring/aromatic vibrationsindicates a pronounced aromatic bond
~1456mediumδ(CH2) scissoring (approx. 1465) + possible aromatic overlaytypical of hydrocarbons; in oils often one of the main deformation bands
~1020mediumfingerprint (C-C/C-O; complex vibrations)“crowded” scope; only general assignment
~908 and ~813mediumaromatic C-H OOP (900–690)supports aromatic interpretation (diagnostic region for aromas)
~776, ~746, ~731strongaromatic C-H OOPThe band arrangement is typical for aromatics; it depends on the type of substitution (should not be assigned to a specific compound).
~722mediumCH2 rocking (long -CH2- sequences) and/or overlapping in the aromatic regionThe 900–650 cm−1 region is very aromatically intense, so the contribution of “pure” CH2 rocking should be treated with caution.
~696–697very strongaromatic C-H OOP (900–690)dominant spectral band; strong signal from aromatic bond
~676mediumaromatic C-H OOPadditional aromatic component in the diagnostic area
Table 10. FTIR spectrum interpretation—AiO batch (based on [41,45]).
Table 10. FTIR spectrum interpretation—AiO batch (based on [41,45]).
Position (cm−1)Intensity (Descriptive)Assignment (Most Typical)Interpretive Commentary
1596strongC=C aromatic ring (ring stretching)clear aromatic signal
1514, 1495medium/strongaromatic ring vibrationsconfirms the presence of aromatic structures (a set of aromatic bands is often observed in this area)
1452mediumδ(CH2)/δ(CH3) + possible aromatic overlaptypical hydrocarbon deformation band; region prone to overlay
1363mediumδ(CH3) bending (around ~1375)confirms the presence of methyl groups
1223strongfingerprint (C-C/C-O; complex vibrations)“crowded” scope; possible contribution of base/additives/aging products
1178, 1071, 998medium/weakfingerprint (C-C/C-O)
909, 887mediumaromatic C-H OOP (900–690)enhances the identification of the presence of aromas
831, 812strong/mediumaromatic C-H OOP (substitution type)diagnostic part for aromatics (substitution-dependent pattern; do not assign to a specific compound)
777, 753, 732strong/very strongaromatic C-H OOPvery clear aromatic “signature” in the 900–650 cm−1 region
697, 691very strongdominant spectral bands; typical of aromatic structures
676mediumadditional aromatic bond in the diagnostic area
Table 11. FTIR spectrum interpretation—PS batch (based on [40,41,42,45]).
Table 11. FTIR spectrum interpretation—PS batch (based on [40,41,42,45]).
Position (cm−1)Intensity (Descriptive)Assignment (Most Typical)Interpretive Commentary
~1495mediumaromatic ring vibrationsone of the typical aromatic bands
~908mediumaromatic C-H OOP (900–690)stronger aromatic signal in the diagnostic area
~776strongaromatic C-H OOPone of the main aromatic bands in the region 900–690 cm−1
~754; ~731; ~728mediumaromatic C-H OOP and possible overlap with CH2 rocking ~722–730The region may contain both an aromatic contribution and a contribution of long -CH2- sequences (contextual interpretation).
~696very strongaromatic C-H OOP (900–690)dominant spectrum band; very clear aromatic “signature”
~682mediumaromatic C-H OOPan additional component in the diagnostic area of aromas
Table 12. FTIR spectrum interpretation—PP batch (based on [40,42,45]).
Table 12. FTIR spectrum interpretation—PP batch (based on [40,42,45]).
Position (cm−1)Intensity (Descriptive)Assignment (Most Typical)Interpretive Commentary
2956very strongν(C-H) CH3/CH2 (asym.)strong aliphatic component typical of a hydrocarbon/oil matrix
2925very strongν(C-H) CH2 (asym., ~2922–2925)confirms the presence of numerous -CH2- groups (aliphatic chains)
2872strongν(C-H) CH3 (sym.)typical aliphatic band in oils
2855mediumν(C-H) CH2 (sym., ~2850)supports the presence of long methylene sequences
1456strongδ(CH2) scissoring (~1465)one of the key deformation bands of the aliphatic fraction
1377strongδ(CH3) bending (~1375)confirms the presence of methyl groups in the oil matrix
1109; 1077; 1021; 991very weak/weakfingerprint (C-C/C-O)“crowded” scope; without formulation information, only general assignment
908mediumaromatic/alkenyl C-H OOPThe 900–690 cm−1 region is diagnostic for aromas (OOP).
888very strongC-H OOP (aromatics/alkenes)strong contribution of aromatic structures/unsaturated systems in the diagnostic area
776; 746; 740mediumaromatic C-H OOPa set of OOP strands typical of aromatic structures
728strongCH2 rocking (~720–730) and/or layering with OOP aromaticsIn oils, the ~722–730 cm−1 band is sometimes attributed to “CH2 rocking” of long chains; here overlap with aromatic bands of the same area is possible.
698very strongaromatic C-H OOPone of the dominant signals of the aromatic region 900–690 cm−1
676mediumadditional aromatic component in the diagnostic area
Table 13. FTIR spectrum interpretation—textile batch, test no. 1 (based on [40,42,45]).
Table 13. FTIR spectrum interpretation—textile batch, test no. 1 (based on [40,42,45]).
Position (cm−1)Intensity (Descriptive)Assignment (Most Typical)Interpretive Commentary
~1733mediumC=O (typically esters; generally “carbonyl region”)The C=O signal indicates a significant contribution of carbonyl compounds (e.g., ester components or oxidation products).
~1703; ~1695strongC=O (carbonyl region 1800–1650 cm−1)Very pronounced absorption around ~1700 cm−1; in operating oils, the C=O region is sometimes used diagnostically for oxidation, but it may also originate from formulation components (e.g., ester bases).
~1647mediumC=C (alkenes/conjugated systems; aromatic contribution possible)The band may accompany unsaturated components; it can be interpreted together with the region 900–650 cm−1.
~1604; ~1495mediumvibrations of the aromatic ring (ring stretching)supports the presence of an aromatic component
~1458/~1452weak/mediumδ(CH2)/δ(CH3) (C-H deformations)Typical hydrocarbon bands; may overlap with other vibrations in mixtures.
~1267strongfingerprint (often C-O/C-C; in esters also ν(C-O) contribution)A “crowded” range; with a strong C=O, may be consistent with the presence of ester functions, but may not identify unambiguously.
~1230; ~1177; ~1105; ~1071; ~1020; ~992medium/weakfingerprint (C-O/C-C; complex vibrations)In formulated oils, fingerprint signals may originate from the base (e.g., ester), additives, or aging products.
~909; ~880; ~824; ~805mediumC-H OOP (aromatics/alkenes)—region 900–690 cm−1Diagnostic region for aromatic structures; band arrangement supports aromatic/unsaturated contribution.
~778; ~758; ~739; ~732medium/strongaromatic C-H OOPset of OOP bands typical for aromatics
~715strongCH2 rocking (~720–730) and/or layering with aromatic OOPIn oils, the ~722–730 cm−1 band is sometimes associated with long -CH2- sequences, but in mixtures it may overlap with aromatic OOP.
~699; ~684; ~678very strong/strongaromatic C-H OOPa very intense “signature” of the aromatic region; in this sample it is one of the dominant features of the spectrum.
Table 14. FTIR spectrum interpretation—textile batch, test no. 2 (based on [40,42,45]).
Table 14. FTIR spectrum interpretation—textile batch, test no. 2 (based on [40,42,45]).
Position (cm−1)Intensity (Descriptive)Assignment (Most Typical)Interpretive Commentary
~3393; ~3307strong, wideO-H stretching (water/water/alcohols/hydroperoxides)A clear share of polar components; in operating oils it may accompany oxidation products (interpretation with caution without a reference sample).
~3067medium=C-H stretching (alkenes/aromatics)indicates unsaturation or aromatic contribution
~1703; ~1693mediumC=O (carbonyl region 1800–1650 cm−1)Pronounced carbonyl absorption; in oil diagnostics, the C=O region is sometimes associated with oxidation, but similar bands may also originate from formulation components (e.g., ester bases).
~1643mediumC=C (alkenes/conjugated systems; aromatic contribution possible)The band is distinct and should be interpreted together with the strong 900–650 cm−1 region.
~1603; ~1492mediumvibrations of the aromatic ring (ring stretching)supports the presence of aromatic ingredients
~1451mediumδ(CH2)/δ(CH3) (C-H deformations)typical hydrocarbon band; in mixtures possible overlap with other vibrations
~1384mediumδ(CH3) bending (~1375).confirms the presence of methyl groups
~1267mediumfingerprint (often C-O/C-C; in esters also ν(C-O) contribution)A “crowded” range; with CO present, it may be consistent with oxygen functional involvement, but the assignment remains generic.
~902; ~880mediumC-H OOP (aromatics/alkenes)—region 900–690 cm−1Diagnostic region for aromatics; presence of bands supports “aromatic/unsaturated contribution”.
~824; ~805medium/strongaromatic C-H OOPPart of the OOP pattern dependent on substitution type; without the library, do not identify a specific compound.
~770; ~751; ~739; ~725; ~715strong/very strongvery distinct aromatic “signature” at 900–650 cm−1
~715 (±)very strongpossible stacking: CH2 rocking (~730–720) and OOP aromaticIn oils, the ~722–730 cm−1 band is sometimes associated with long -CH2- sequences (rocking), but in this sample the region is strongly “aromatic”, so the assignment is only cautious.
~693; ~677; ~671very strongaromatic C-H OOPdominant spectral bands in the diagnostic area of aromas
Table 15. Relative FTIR-based ranking of main oil fractions (trend-only, no absolute index values).
Table 15. Relative FTIR-based ranking of main oil fractions (trend-only, no absolute index values).
Feedstock/FractionAliphatic Character
(C-H 3000–2800; 1450/1375)
Aromatic/Styrenic Character
(1605–1495; OOP 900–690)
Oxygenated Character
(C=O 1850–1650; O-H 3600–3200)
Key Interpretation Notes
PPhighlow/moderatelowDominant polyolefin-like hydrocarbon matrix; aromatic OOP features present but secondary/overlapping.
ABS oils (drum/mix)moderate/highmoderate/highlow/moderatemixed aliphatic–aromatic signature typical of styrenic blends; possible contribution of additives/aging products
keyboardsmoderatehighlowstrong aromatic OOP system; aliphatic C-H present but less dominant
AiOmoderatehighlowpronounced aromatic fingerprint; weak C=O/O-H contribution
PCBlow/moderatehighlow/moderateStrong aromatic signature; carbonyl/O-H bands suggest polar components; resin/flame-retarded feedstock requires GC-MS/elemental confirmation.
PS low/moderatevery highlowMost structured aromatic OOP region; FTIR consistent with aromatic-rich products but not compound-specific.
textile (no. 1 & 2)low/moderatehighhighClear C=O and O-H together with aromatic OOP; consistent with oxygenated constituents but not uniquely assignable by FTIR.
Table 16. Measured parameters, observations, comments and statistics—all main fractions distillation tests.
Table 16. Measured parameters, observations, comments and statistics—all main fractions distillation tests.
Batch Material from Which the Main Fraction Was ObtainedTest No.Load QuantityDistillateGas Fractions (Estimated) 1Amount of Distillates Per Unit of Main FractionObservations and Comments
Obtained at 250 °CObtained at 250–350 °CTotal
QuantityVolume PercentQuantityVolume PercentQuantityVolume PercentQuantityVolume PercentDistillate Obtained at 250 °CDistillate Obtained at 250–350 °CTotal
mL, ±10 mLmL, ±10 mLv/v, %mL, ±10 mLv/v, %mL, ±10 mLv/v, %mL, ±10 mLv/v, %ml/L, %
PS16000350058.34707.8397066.1203033.9580, 58%80, 8%660, 66%- noticeable foaming during distillation in the T range of 135–155 °C
- condensation for inside the receiver appears at approx. 180 °C
26550380058.089013.5469071.5186028.5580, 58%140, 14%720, 72%
35200290055.7102019.6392075.3128024.7560, 56%200, 20%760, 76%
44500300066.665014.4365081.085019.0670, 67%140, 14%810, 81%
53000190063.338012.6228075.972024.0630, 63%130, 13%760, 76%
average and standard deviation5050
σ = 1390
3020
σ = 730
60.4
σ = 4.4
680
σ = 270
13.6
σ = 4.2
3700
σ = 880
74.0
σ = 5.5
1350
σ = 586
26.0
σ = 5.5
600, 60%
σ = 40
140, 14%
σ = 40
740, 74%
σ = 60
ABS drum1179090050.330016.7120067.059033.0500, 50%170, 17%670, 67%
2175035020.031017.766037.7109062.3200, 20%180, 18%380, 38%
3171090052.640023.4130076.041024.0530, 53%230, 23%760, 76%
4107060056.021019.681075.626024.4560, 56%200, 20%760, 76%
5112039034.820017.859053.053047.0350, 36%180, 18%530, 53%
average and standard deviation1490
σ = 360
630
σ = 270
42.7
σ = 15.1
280
σ = 80
19.0
σ = 2.7
910
σ = 320
61.8
σ = 16.5
580
σ = 310
38.2
σ = 16.5
430, 43%
σ = 150
190, 19%
σ = 30
620, 62%
σ = 160
PP12400115048.043018.0158066.082034.0480, 48%180, 18%660, 66%-
2205080039.050024.3130063.475036.6390, 39%240, 24%630, 63%
average223098043.547021.2145064.779035.3430, 43%210, 21%640, 64%
keyboards14050260064.23508.6295072.8110027.2640, 64%90, 9%730, 73%-
AiO12950160054.250016.9210071.185028.9540, 54%170, 17%710, 71%-
1 as the amount of liquid that has volatilized.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Piotrowicz, A.; Kolczyński, J.; Kostrzewa, M.; Kaczmarek, W.; Samojeden, B. Microwave Depolymerization of Various Plastic Wastes—Quarter-Scale Testing. Clean Technol. 2026, 8, 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8020044

AMA Style

Piotrowicz A, Kolczyński J, Kostrzewa M, Kaczmarek W, Samojeden B. Microwave Depolymerization of Various Plastic Wastes—Quarter-Scale Testing. Clean Technologies. 2026; 8(2):44. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8020044

Chicago/Turabian Style

Piotrowicz, Andrzej, Janusz Kolczyński, Mirosław Kostrzewa, Wojciech Kaczmarek, and Bogdan Samojeden. 2026. "Microwave Depolymerization of Various Plastic Wastes—Quarter-Scale Testing" Clean Technologies 8, no. 2: 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8020044

APA Style

Piotrowicz, A., Kolczyński, J., Kostrzewa, M., Kaczmarek, W., & Samojeden, B. (2026). Microwave Depolymerization of Various Plastic Wastes—Quarter-Scale Testing. Clean Technologies, 8(2), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8020044

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop