Integrating Coagulation and Flotation via Hydrodynamic Cavitation: The Key Role of Venturi Divergent Angle for Humic Substance Removal
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Experimental Setup
2.3. Experimental Procedures
2.4. Analytical Method
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Coagulation Diagram
3.2. Optimization of a HC System as a Function of Inlet Pressure, Flotation Time, and Initial Humic Acid Concentration
3.3. Influence of the Divergent Angle of Cavitation Devices on the Removal Efficiency of Humic Acid
3.4. Comparison Between the HC System and Flotest
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ANOVA | Analysis of variance |
| CFD | Computational fluid dynamics |
| DAF | Dissolved-air flotation |
| HC | Hydrodynamic cavitation |
| HSs | Humic substances |
| H2SO4 | Sulfuric acid |
| NaOH | Sodium hydroxide |
| RCCD | Rotated central composite design |
| SW | Saturated water with dissolved air |
| TOC | Total organic carbon |
References
- Cappa, O.A.P.; Soeira, T.V.R.; Simões, A.L.A.; Junior, G.B.L.; Gonçalves, J.C.S.I. Experimental and computational analyses for induced cavitating flows in orifice plates. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 37, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, P.; Song, Y.; Yu, S. Removal of Microcystis aeruginosa using hydrodynamic cavitation: Performance and mechanisms. Water Res. 2014, 62, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machado, P.R.; Soeira, T.V.R.; Pagan, F.S.; Malpass, G.R.P.; Gonçalves, J.C.S.I.; Ferreira, D.C. Synergistic bromothymol blue dye degradation with hydrodynamic cavitation and hydrogen peroxide (HC-H2O2). Rev. Ambient. Água 2020, 15, e2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patil, P.B.; Bhandari, V.M.; Ranade, V.V. Improving efficiency for removal of ammoniacal nitrogen from wastewaters using hydrodynamic cavitation. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 70, 105306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fedorov, K.; Dinesh, K.; Sun, X.; Soltani, R.D.C.; Wang, Z.; Sonawane, S.; Boczkaj, G. Synergistic effects of hybrid advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) based on hydrodynamic cavitation phenomenon—A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 432, 134191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raut-Jadhav, S.; Saharan, V.K.; Pinjari, D.; Sonawane, S.; Saini, D.; Pandit, A. Synergetic effect of combination of AOP’s (hydrodynamic cavitation and H2O2) on the degradation of neonicotinoid class of insecticide. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 261, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, B.; Su, H.; Zhang, B. Hydrodynamic cavitation as a promising route for wastewater treatment—A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 412, 128685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, L.; Li, B.; Sun, Y.; Li, S.; Qi, Q.; Qin, J.; Sun, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Fang, D. Degradation of norfloxacin in aqueous solution using hydrodynamic cavitation: Optimization of geometric and operation parameters and investigations on mechanism. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 259, 118166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Liu, J.; Ji, L.; Wang, G.; Zhao, S.; Yoon, J.Y.; Chen, S. A review on hydrodynamic cavitation disinfection: The current state of knowledge. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 737, 139606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bokhari, A.; Chuah, L.F.; Yusup, S.; Klemeš, J.J.; Akbar, M.M.; Kamil, R.N.M. Cleaner production of rubber seed oil methyl ester using a hydrodynamic cavitation: Optimisation and parametric study. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 136, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilares, R.T.; de Almeida, G.F.; Ahmed, M.A.; Antunes, F.A.F.; da Silva, S.S.; Han, J.-I.; dos Santos, J.C. Hydrodynamic cavitation as an efficient pretreatment method for lignocellulosic biomass: A parametric study. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 235, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rezende, G.B.; Fernandes, D.M.; Ferreira, D.C.; Gonçalves, J.C.S.I. Venturi: Dispositivo de cavitação hidrodinâmica para acelerar a síntese de biodiesel. Eng. Sanit. Ambient. 2021, 26, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarkoti, C.; Thanekar, P.D.; Gogate, P.R. Cavitation based treatment of industrial wastewater: A critical review focusing on mechanisms, design aspects, operating conditions and application to real effluents. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 300, 113786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gujar, S.K.; Gogate, P.R.; Kanthale, P.; Pandey, R.; Thakre, S.; Agrawal, M. Combined oxidation processes based on ultrasound, hydrodynamic cavitation and chemical oxidants for treatment of real industrial wastewater from cellulosic fiber manufacturing sector. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 257, 117888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soeira, T.V.R.; da Luz, M.S.; Osiro, L.; Gonçalves, J.C.S.I. The divergent angle of cavitational devices influences melanoidin degradation. A new look through experimental and computational analysis. J. Water Process Eng. 2023, 53, 103684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Chen, H.; Yuan, R.; Wang, F.; Ma, F.; Zhou, B. Intensified degradation of textile wastewater using a novel treatment of hydrodynamic cavitation with the combination of ozone. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bashir, T.A.; Soni, A.G.; Mahulkar, A.V.; Pandit, A.B. The CFD driven optimisation of a modified venturi for cavitational activity. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 89, 1366–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuldeep, S.V.K. Computational study of different venturi and orifice type hydrodynamic cavitating devices. J. Hydrodyn. 2016, 28, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simpson, A.; Ranade, V.V. Modelling of hydrodynamic cavitation with orifice: Influence of different orifice designs. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2018, 136, 698–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simpson, A.; Ranade, V.V. Flow characteristics of vortex based cavitation devices. AIChE J. 2019, 65, e16675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, M.; Sharma, J.; Yadav, R.K.; Gole, V.L. Microbial disinfection of water using hydrodynamic cavitational reactors. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 41, 102097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kosel, J.; Gutiérrez-Aguirre, I.; Rački, N.; Dreo, T.; Ravnikar, M.; Dular, M. Efficient inactivation of MS-2 virus in water by hydrodynamic cavitation. Water Res. 2017, 124, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Batista, M.D.; Anhê, A.C.B.M.; Gonçalves, J.C.S.I. Use of Hydrodynamic Cavitation for Algae Removal: Effect on the Inactivation of Microalgae Belonging to Genus Scenedesmus. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017, 228, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, S.; Wang, X.; Bu, X.; Wang, M.; An, B.; Shao, H.; Ni, C.; Peng, Y.; Xie, G. A novel flotation technique combining carrier flotation and cavitation bubbles to enhance separation efficiency of ultra-fine particles. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020, 64, 105005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ross, V.; Singh, A.; Pillay, K. Improved flotation of PGM tailings with a high-shear hydrodynamic cavitation device. Miner. Eng. 2019, 137, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranade, V.V. Modeling of Hydrodynamic Cavitation Reactors: Reflections on Present Status and Path Forward. ACS Eng. Au 2022, 2, 461–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hui, X.; Jiao, R.; Xiao, F.; Wang, D. Enhanced removal for humic-acid (HA) and coagulation process using carbon nanotubes (CNTs)/polyalumium chloride (PACl) composites coagulants. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 490, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolan, N.S.; Adriano, D.C.; Kusnikrishnan, A.; James, T.; McDowell, R.; Senesi, N. Dissolved organic matter: Biogeochemistry, Dynamics and Agroenvironmental Significance in soil. Adv. Agron. 2011, 110, 1–75. [Google Scholar]
- De Julio, M.; Neves, E.F.A.; Trofino, J.C.; Di Bernardo, L. Emprego do reagente de fenton como agente coagulante na remoção de substâncias húmicas de água por meio da flotação por ar dissolvido e filtração. Eng. Sanit. Ambient. 2006, 11, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Du, Q.; Zhang, S.; Song, J.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, F. Activation of porous magnetized biochar by artificial humic acid for effective removal of lead ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 389, 122115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gągol, M.; Przyjazny, A.; Boczkaj, G. Wastewater treatment by means of advanced oxidation processes based on cavitation—A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 338, 599–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, L.R.S.; Mateus, M.V.; Rocha, V.C.; Campos, A.; Dos Santos, C.E.D.; Poleto, C.; Begnini, M.L.; Gonçalves, J.C.S.I.; Da Luz, M.S. Humic acid degradation through catalytic ozonization process. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2025, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araujo, M.N.; Soeira, T.V.R.; Poleto, C.; Rezende, E.G.F.; Cappa, O.A.P.; Ferreira, D.C.; Rocha, V.C.; Gonçalves, J.C.S.I. Removal of natural organic matter in waters using hydrodynamic cavitation and hydrogen peroxide (HC-H2O2). Rev. Eletronica Em Gest. Educ. E Tecnol. Ambient. 2020, 24, e29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asgari, G.; Mohammadi, A.S.; Mortazavi, S.B.; Ramavandi, B. Investigation on the pyrolysis of cow bone as a catalyst for ozone aqueous decomposition: Kinetic approach. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2013, 99, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, J.-T.; Lee, W.-H.; Kim, J.-O. Photodegradation and permeability of conventional photocatalytic reactor and two different submerged membrane photocatalytic reactors for the removal of humic acid in water. Desalination Water Treat. 2016, 57, 26765–26772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajaei, F.; Taheri, E.; Hadi, S.; Fatehizadeh, A.; Amin, M.M.; Rafei, N.; Fadaei, S.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Enhanced removal of humic acid from aqueous solution by combined alternating current electrocoagulation and sulfate radical. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 277, 116632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yusof, M.A.M.; Seman, M.N.A.; Hilal, N. Development of polyamide forward osmosis membrane for humic acid removal. Desalination Water Treat. 2016, 57, 29113–29117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seredyńska-Sobecka, B.; Tomaszewska, M.; Morawski, A.W. Removal of humic acids by the ozonation–biofiltration process. Desalination 2006, 198, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, P.; Song, J.; Yang, L.; Jin, X.; Wang, X.C. Selective binding behavior of humic acid removal by aluminum coagulation. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 233, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.N.; Li, A.M.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, L. Study on the influence of humic acid of different molecular weight on basic ion exchange resin’s adsorption capacity. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2009, 20, 1478–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, C.; Yang, S.; Huang, G.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, P.; Yao, Y. Removal of sulfonated humic acid from aqueous phase by modified coal fly ash waste: Equilibrium and kinetic adsorption studies. Fuel 2016, 165, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, J.; Jin, P.; Jin, X.; Wang, X.C. Synergistic effects of various in situ hydrolyzed aluminum species for the removal of humic acid. Water Res. 2019, 148, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Souza Lopes Silva, P.; Mateus, M.V.; Ferreira, D.C.; da Luz, M.S.; Araujo Naves, E.A.; Martins, M.M.; Goulart, L.R.; Cunha, L.C.; Goncalves, J.C.S.I. Humic substances reduce the oxygen mass transfer in the air–water interface. AIChE J. 2020, 66, e16971.44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutton, R.; Sposito, G. Molecular structure in soil humic substances: The new view. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 9009–9015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Cunha, P.C.R.; Ullmann, G.; Vieira, L.G.M.; Damasceno, J.J.R.; Gonçalves, J.C.S.I. Study of the degradation of sodium dodecyl sulfate surfactant from hydrodynamic cavitation coupled to oxygen injection generated by a low-cost electrolytic cell using solar energy. J. Water Process Eng. 2024, 64, 105562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menter, F.R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 1994, 32, 1598–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schnerr, G.H.; Sauer, J. Physical and Numerical Modeling of Unsteady Cavitation Dynamics. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Multiphase, New Orleans, FL, USA, 27 May 2001; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Camp, T.R.; Stein, P.C. Velocity Gradients and Internal Work in Fluid Motion. J. Boston Soc. Civ. Eng. 1943, 30, 219–237. [Google Scholar]
- Luiz, D.B.; Angela, D.B.; Luiz, C.F.P. Ensaios de Tratabilidade de Água e de Resíduos Gerados em Estações de Tratamento de Água; Rima: São Carlos, Brazil, 2002; 237p. [Google Scholar]
- Li, M.; Bussonnière, A.; Bronson, M.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Q. Study of Venturi tube geometry on the hydrodynamic cavitation for the generation of microbubbles. Miner. Eng. 2019, 132, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Yuste-Córdoba, F.J.; Cintas, P.; Wu, Z.; Boffa, L.; Mantegna, S.; Cravotto, G. Effects of ultrasonic and hydrodynamic cavitation on the treatment of cork wastewater by flocculation and Fenton processes. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018, 40, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lunardi, C.N.; Gomes, A.J.; Rocha, F.S.; De Tommaso, J.; Patience, G.S. Experimental methods in chemical engineering: Zeta potential. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 99, 627–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammadi-Jam, S.; Waters, K.E.; Greenwood, R.W. A review of zeta potential measurements using electroacoustics. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 309, 102778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takahashi, M. ζ Potential of Microbubbles in Aqueous Solutions: Electrical Properties of the Gas−Water Interface. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 21858–21864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Takahashi, M.; Chiba, K.; Li, P. Free-Radical Generation from Collapsing Microbubbles in the Absence of a Dynamic Stimulus. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 1343–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trushin, A.M.; Dmitriev, E.A.; Akimov, V.V. Mechanics of the formation of microbubbles in gas dispersion through the pores of microfiltration membranes. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 2011, 45, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukherjee, A.; Mullick, A.; Vadthya, P.; Moulik, S.; Roy, A. Surfactant degradation using hydrodynamic cavitation based hybrid advanced oxidation technology: A techno economic feasibility study. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 398, 125599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, J.C.R.; Mateus, M.V.; Malpass, G.R.P.; Ferreira, D.C.; da Luz, M.S.; Gonçalves, J.C.S.I. Hybrid technology combining hydrodynamic cavitation and oxidative processes to degrade surfactants from a real effluent. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2023, 40, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mello, V.F.B.; Abreu, J.P.G.; Ferreira, J.M.; Jucá, J.F.T.; Motta Sobrinho, M.A. Variables in the process of coagulation / flocculation / settling of leachate of municipal landfills. Rev. Ambient. Água 2012, 7, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Sloboda, E.; Vieira, E.M.; Dantas, A.D.B.; Di Bernardo, L. The influence of aquatic humic substances characteristics on the coagulation efficiency using ferric chloride. Quím Nova 2009, 32, 976–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kan, C.; Huang, C.; Pan, J.R. Time requirement for rapid-mixing in coagulation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2002, 203, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felici, E.M.; Kuroda, E.K.; Yamashita, F.; da Silva, S.M.C.P. Remoção de carga orgânica recalcitrante de lixiviado de resíduos sólidos urbanos pré-tratado biologicamente por coagulação química-floculação-sedimentação. Eng. Sanit. Ambient. 2013, 18, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Cassettari, L.; Mosca, R.; Revetria, R.; Rolando, F. Effectiveness and limits of response surface methodology in application to discrete and stochastic simulation of manufacturing plants. Appl. Math. Sci. 2013, 7, 4137–4172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.; Randhavane, S. Hydrodynamic Cavitation: Its optimization and potential application in treatment of Pigment Industry Wastewater. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 61, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashrafizadeh, S.M.; Ghassemi, H. Experimental and numerical investigation on the performance of small-sized cavitating venturis. Flow. Meas. Instrum. 2015, 42, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadumaran, N.; Alias, E.A. Impact of Throat Diameter, Length, and Divergent Angle on Bubble Formation and Flow Characteristics in Venturi Microbubble Generators. Int. J. Automot. Mech. Eng. 2025, 22, 12933–12942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, P.; Juárez, J.M.; Li, H. Investigation on the Effect of Structural Parameters on Cavitation Characteristics for the Venturi Tube Using the CFD Method. Water 2019, 11, 2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Inlet Pressure (Bar) | Flow Rate (L Min−1) | Velocity (m s−1) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.6 | 1.2 | 6.4 |
| 1.7 | 2.1 | 11.1 |
| 3.5 | 4.6 | 24.4 |
| 5.3 | 5.7 | 30.2 |
| 6.5 | 6.4 | 34.0 |
| Independent Variables | Levels | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (−α) | (−1) | (0) | (+1) | (+α) | |
| Inlet pressure (bar) | 0.6 | 1.7 | 3.5 | 5.3 | 6.5 |
| Humic acid (mg L−1) | 16 | 50 | 60 | 150 | 187 |
| Flotation time (s) | 11 | 30 | 60 | 90 | 118 |
| Experiment | Inlet Pressure (Bar) | Humic Acid (mg L−1) | Flotation Time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 1.7 | 50 | 30 |
| 02 | 5.3 | 50 | 30 |
| 03 | 1.7 | 150 | 30 |
| 04 | 5.3 | 150 | 30 |
| 05 | 1.7 | 50 | 90 |
| 06 | 5.3 | 50 | 90 |
| 07 | 1.7 | 150 | 90 |
| 08 | 5.3 | 150 | 90 |
| 09 | 0.6 | 60 | 60 |
| 10 | 6.5 | 60 | 60 |
| 11 | 3.5 | 16 | 60 |
| 12 | 3.5 | 187 | 60 |
| 13 | 3.5 | 100 | 11 |
| 14 | 3.5 | 100 | 118 |
| 15 | 3.5 | 100 | 60 |
| 16 | 3.5 | 100 | 60 |
| 17 | 3.5 | 100 | 60 |
| G (s−1) | t (s) | Saturated Water (%) | HS Removal (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 250 | 8 | 5% | 13.4 |
| 10% | 54.6 | ||
| 15% | 75.3 | ||
| 20% | 75.8 | ||
| 30% | 78.9 | ||
| 500 | 4 | 5% | 1.0 |
| 10% | 78.1 | ||
| 15% | 79.3 | ||
| 20% | 79.5 | ||
| 30% | 84.2 | ||
| 750 | 2.6 | 5% | 11.2 |
| 10% | 65.3 | ||
| 15% | 67.0 | ||
| 20% | 68.4 | ||
| 30% | 75.2 | ||
| 1000 | 2 | 5% | 0.7 |
| 10% | 53.0 | ||
| 15% | 64.2 | ||
| 20% | 72.9 | ||
| 30% | 89.8 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Pagan, F.d.S.; Mateus, M.V.; Soeira, T.V.R.; da Luz, M.S.; Ferreira, D.C.; Moruzzi, R.; Simões, A.L.A.; Gonçalves, J.C.d.S.I. Integrating Coagulation and Flotation via Hydrodynamic Cavitation: The Key Role of Venturi Divergent Angle for Humic Substance Removal. Clean Technol. 2026, 8, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8020027
Pagan FdS, Mateus MV, Soeira TVR, da Luz MS, Ferreira DC, Moruzzi R, Simões ALA, Gonçalves JCdSI. Integrating Coagulation and Flotation via Hydrodynamic Cavitation: The Key Role of Venturi Divergent Angle for Humic Substance Removal. Clean Technologies. 2026; 8(2):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8020027
Chicago/Turabian StylePagan, Fausto de Souza, Marcos Vinícius Mateus, Thiago Vinicius Ribeiro Soeira, Mário Sérgio da Luz, Deusmaque Carneiro Ferreira, Rodrigo Moruzzi, André Luiz Andrade Simões, and Julio Cesar de Souza Inácio Gonçalves. 2026. "Integrating Coagulation and Flotation via Hydrodynamic Cavitation: The Key Role of Venturi Divergent Angle for Humic Substance Removal" Clean Technologies 8, no. 2: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8020027
APA StylePagan, F. d. S., Mateus, M. V., Soeira, T. V. R., da Luz, M. S., Ferreira, D. C., Moruzzi, R., Simões, A. L. A., & Gonçalves, J. C. d. S. I. (2026). Integrating Coagulation and Flotation via Hydrodynamic Cavitation: The Key Role of Venturi Divergent Angle for Humic Substance Removal. Clean Technologies, 8(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8020027

