Satellite-Constrained Estimation of Emissions from Crop Residue Open Burning in Guangxi, Southern China (2017–2023)
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Methods for Estimating Emissions from Crop Residue Open Burning
2.2.1. Estimation of In-Field Crop Residue Burning
| Crop | Grain-to-Straw Ratio | Combustion Efficiency |
|---|---|---|
| Sugarcane | 0.3 a | 0.68 a |
| Rice | 1.17 b | 0.93 d |
| Corn | 1.2 c | 0.92 d |
| Cassava | 1.41 e | 0.68 c |
| Year | Fire Count | Sugarcane | Rice | Corn | Cassava |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2144 | 32.90% | 28.60% | 31.90% | 31.70% |
| 2018 | 1812 | 27.81% | 24.17% | 26.96% | 26.79% |
| 2019 | 2184 | 33.51% | 29.13% | 32.50% | 32.29% |
| 2020 | 2508 | 38.49% | 33.46% | 37.32% | 37.08% |
| 2021 | 4236 | 65.00% | 56.51% | 63.03% | 62.63% |
| 2022 | 3157 | 48.44% | 42.11% | 46.97% | 46.68% |
| 2023 | 2991 | 45.90% | 39.90% | 44.50% | 44.22% |
2.2.2. Emission Factors
2.3. Method for Spatial Allocation
2.4. Method for Temporal Allocation
2.5. Method for Uncertainty Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Emissions from Crop Residue Open Burning
3.2. Spatial Distribution of Emissions
3.3. Temporal Variation of Emissions
3.4. Comparison with Previous Studies
3.5. Comparison with PM2.5 Concentrations from National Monitoring Stations
3.6. Analysis of Uncertainty
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhou, Y.; Xing, X.; Lang, J.; Chen, D.; Cheng, S.; Wei, L.; Wei, X.; Liu, C. A comprehensive biomass burning emission inventory with high spatial and temporal resolution in China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 2839–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Huang, Z.; Jia, G.; Fan, M.; Cheng, L.; Chen, L.; Shao, M.; Zheng, J. Regional discrepancies in spatiotemporal variations and driving forces of open crop residue burning emissions in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 671, 536–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kabange, N.; Kwon, Y.; Lee, S.; Kang, J.; Cha, J.; Park, H.; Dzorkpe, G.D.; Shin, D.; Oh, K.-W.; Lee, J.-H. Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from crop production and management practices, and livestock: A review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akshaya, V.; Akila, I.; Murali, R.; Raajasubramanian, D.; Kuppan, N.; Srinivasan, S. Rice straw biomass and agricultural residues as strategic bioenergy: Effects on the environment and economy path with new directions. Energy Environ. Sustain. 2023, 1, 139–164. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Qian, X. A high-resolution inventory of air pollutant emissions from crop residue burning in China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 2018, 213, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, X.; Xiu, A. Carbonaceous gas and aerosol emissions from biomass burning in China from 2012 to 2021. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 36, 132–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, J.; Ji, Y.; Xu, W.; Shen, R.; Ma, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, X.; Ma, Y.; Feng, Y. China Open Biomass Burning Emissions Inventory (COBBEI) from 2020 to 2023: Multi-Satellite Fusion via FRP-Based Filtering Rules. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 2025, 1, 1–30. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.; Li, C.; Ristovski, Z.; Milic, A.; Gu, Y.; Islam, M.S.; Wang, S.; Hao, J.; Zhang, H.; He, C.; et al. A review of biomass burning: Emissions and impacts on air quality, health and climate in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 1000–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chanana, I.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, L.; Kulshreshtha, S.; Kumar, S.; Patel, S. Combustion and stubble burning: A major concern for the environment and human health. Fire 2023, 6, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Chen, J.; Ma, Z.; Ye, X.; Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Tang, X.; Zhang, R.; et al. Multi-pollutant emissions from the burning of major agricultural residues in China and the related health-economic effects. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 4957–4988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, X.; Duan, L.; Chai, F.; Wang, S.; Yu, Q.; Wang, S. Deriving high-resolution emission inventory of open biomass burning in China based on satellite observations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 11779–11786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, J.; Kong, S.; Wu, F.; Cheng, Y.; Zheng, S.; Yan, Q.; Zheng, H.; Yang, G.; Zheng, M.; Liu, D.; et al. Estimating the open biomass burning emissions in central and eastern China from 2003 to 2015 based on satellite observation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018, 18, 11623–11646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Liu, X.; Qu, Y.; An, J.L.; Jiang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, F.; Xu, W.; et al. Characteristics and formation mechanism of continuous hazes in China: A case study during the autumn of 2014 in the North China Plain. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 8165–8178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Hao, L. Contributions of open crop straw burning emissions to PM2.5 concentrations in China. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 014014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, S.; Wang, X.; Xiao, Y.; Tani, H.; Zhong, G.; Sun, Z. Study on spatial distribution of crop residue burning and PM2.5 change in China. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 220, 204–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, L.; Ren, C.; Li, S.; Yang, W.; Yang, Y.; Li, J.; Fan, W.; Liu, R. Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Carbon Emissions in the Pearl River Basin, China: From the Perspective of Land Use and Biomass Burning. Land Degrad. Dev. 2025, 36, 5876–5898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stavrakou, T.; Müller, J.-F.; Bauwens, M.; De Smedt, I.; Van Roozendael, M.; Guenther, A.; Wild, M.; Xia, X. Substantial Underestimation of Post-Harvest Burning Emissions in the North China Plain Revealed by Multi-Species Space Observations. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Xin, J.; Li, X.; Wang, Y. The Variability of Biomass Burning and Its Influence on Regional Aerosol Properties during the Wheat Harvest Season in North China. Atmos. Res. 2015, 157, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, X. Study on the Variation Characteristics of Open Straw Burning and Its Impact on Air Quality in North and Northeast China. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 2017. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Shen, Y.; Jiang, C.; Chan, K.L.; Wang, Z.; Su, D.; Wang, T.; Zhang, Y. Estimation of Field-Level NOx Emissions from Crop Residue Burning Using Remote Sensing Data: A Case Study in Hubei, China. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.; de Jong, M.C.; Wooster, M.J.; Xu, W.; Wang, L. Trends in eastern China agricultural fire emissions derived from a combination of geostationary (Himawari) and polar (VIIRS) orbiter fire radiative power products. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 10687–10705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, G.; Siqueira, R.; Rosário, N.; Longo, K.; Freitas, S.; Cardozo, F.; Johannes, W.; Wooster, M. Assessment of fire emission inventories during the South American Biomass Burning Analysis (SAMBBA) experiment. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 6961–6975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Y.; Huang, H.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, L.; Fan, Q. Three-Dimensional Biomass Burning Emission Inventory for Southeast and East Asia Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion and Machine Learning. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 2025, 1, 1–42. [Google Scholar]
- Darmenov, A.; da Silva, A. The Quick Fire Emissions Dataset (QFED): Documentation of Versions 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4; Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center: Greenbelt, MD, USA, 2015; Volume 38.
- Pan, X.; Ichoku, C.; Chin, M.; Bian, H.; Darmenov, A.; Colarco, P.; Ellison, L.; Kucsera, T.; da Silva, A.; Wang, J.; et al. Six Global Biomass Burning Emission Datasets: Intercomparison and Application in One Global Aerosol Model. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 969–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Li, R.; Tao, M.; Wang, L.; Lin, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, W.; Chen, L. Overview of the performance of satellite fire products in China: Uncertainties and challenges. Atmos. Environ. 2022, 268, 118838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Y.; Gao, H.; Liao, H.; Tian, X. Spatiotemporal Variations and Uncertainty in Crop Residue Burning Emissions over North China Plain: Implication for Atmospheric CO2 Simulation. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Li, Y.; Bo, Y.; Xie, S. High-resolution historical emission inventories of crop residue burning in fields in China for the period 1990–2013. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 138, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, B.; Lang, J.; Xia, X.; Chen, D.; Cheng, S. Estimating air pollutant emissions from crop residue open burning through a calculation of open burning proportion based on satellite-derived fire radiative energy. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 286, 117477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Wang, S.; Duan, L.; Hao, J.; Li, C.; Chen, Y.; Yang, L. Particulate and trace gas emissions from open burning of wheat straw and corn stover in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 6052–6058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, R.; Huang, Y.; He, L.; Pan, Q.; Yan, W.; Liu, Y.; Yao, T. Evaluation of Emissions from Open Crop residue burning in Guangxi (2017–2021) Based on Fire radiative Energy Data. Environ. Monit. China 2023, 39, 227–235. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Liu, H.; Zhu, W.; Yi, S.; Li, W.; Chen, L.; Bai, L. Climatic analysis of the cloud over china. Acta Meteorol. Sin. 2003, 4, 466–473. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Ying, L.; Shen, Z.; Yang, M.; Piao, S. Wildfire Detection Probability of MODIS Fire Products under the Constraint of Environmental Factors: A Study Based on Confirmed Ground Wildfire Records. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Mo, Z.; Qing, W. Emission inventory and thesoatio-temporal of pollutant from open field straw burning in Guangxi. Environ. Pollut. Control 2022, 44, 631–638. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Luo, Y. Study on Pollution Characteristics and Emission Estimation of Biomass Burning Sources in Guangxi Province. Master’s Thesis, Guangxi University, Nanning, China, June 2022. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Y. Study on Evolution Characteristics and Dynamic Estimations of Open Biomass Burning Emissions, in China. Doctoral Dissertation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China, June 2020. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Peng, L.; Zhang, Q.; Yao, Z.; Mauzerall, D.; Kang, S.; Du, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Xue, T.; He, K. Underreported coal in statistics: A survey-based solid fuel consumption and emission inventory for the rural residential sector in China. Appl. Energy 2019, 235, 1169–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Wang, S.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Ouyang, D.; Zheng, H.; Han, L.; Qiu, X. Emission trends of air pollutants and CO2 in China from 2005 to 2021. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2023, 15, 2279–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, J.; Cui, K.; Huang, J.; He, F.; Peng, S. Responses of Physio-Biochemical Properties to N-Fertilizer Application and Its Relationship with Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Rice. Acta Agron. Sin. 2007, 33, 1168–1176. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Ye, X.; Cheng, T.; Chen, J.; Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, R. A laboratory study of agricultural crop residue combustion in China: Emission factors and emission inventory. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 8432–8441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Cao, Y.; Wang, X.; Ge, X.; Li, B.; Jin, C. Evaluation on the production of food crop straw in China from 2006 to 2014. BioEnergy Res. 2017, 10, 949–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akagi, S.K.; Yokelson, R.J.; Wiedinmyer, C.; Alvarado, M.J.; Reid, J.S.; Karl, T.; Crounse, J.D.; Wennberg, P.O. Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 4039–4072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, G.; Zhang, X.; Gong, S.; Zheng, F. Investigation on emission factors of particulate matter and gaseous pollutants from crop residue burning. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Shao, M.; Lin, Y.; Luan, S.; Mao, N.; Chen, W.; Wang, M. Emission inventory of carbonaceous pollutants from biomass burning in the Pearl River Delta Region, China. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 76, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EPD: Guide for Compiling Atmospheric Pollutant Emission Inventory for Biomass Burning, Environmental Protection Department. 2014. Available online: https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201501/t20150107_293955.htm (accessed on 26 June 2022). (In Chinese)
- Streets, D.; Yarber, K.; Woo, J.; Carmichael, G. Biomass burning in Asia: Annual and seasonal estimates and atmospheric emissions. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2003, 17, 10997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, R.; Jiang, W.; Gao, W.; Sun, S. Emission inventory of crop residue open burning and its high-resolution spatial distribution in 2014 for Shandong province, China. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2017, 8, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Department of Ecology and Environment of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Interim Measures for the Management of Straw Burning Prohibition in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region; Department of Ecology and Environment of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region: Nanning, China, 2020. Available online: http://sthjt.gxzf.gov.cn/zfxxgk/zfxxgkgl/fdzdgknr/zcwj/gfxwj/W020240702414791673234.pdf (accessed on 2 March 2026). (In Chinese)
- Department of Ecology and Environment of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 2020 Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan; Department of Ecology and Environment of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region: Nanning, China, 2020. Available online: http://sthjt.gxzf.gov.cn/zfxxgk/zfxxgkgl/fdzdgknr/zcwj/gfxwj/t18633225.shtml (accessed on 2 March 2026). (In Chinese)
- He, X.; Huang, Q.; Yang, D.; Yang, Y.; Xie, G.; Yang, S.; Liang, C.; Qin, Z. Spatiotemporal Analysis of Open Biomass Burning in Guangxi Province, China, from 2012 to 2023 Based on VIIRS. Fire 2024, 7, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Q.; Pan, R.; Xie, Y.; He, L.; Huang, N. Analysis of Carbon Emission Characteristics of Open-air Straw Burning in Guangxi. Environ. Sci. Surv. 2024, 43, 25–29. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Huang, W.; Gao, C.; Wu, B.; Chen, T.; Yang, T.; Zhang, B. Development Path of Guangxi to Reach the Carbon Emission Peak Based on STIRPAT Model. Environ. Sci. 2025, 46, 682–695. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Cariappa, A.A.; Konath, N.C.; Sapkota, T.B.; Krishna, V.V. Evaluating the potential and eligibility of conservation agriculture practices for carbon credits. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 9193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 2017 National Emissions Inventory (NEI) Data; U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/2017-national-emissions-inventory-nei-data (accessed on 3 March 2026).
- Zhao, Y.; Nielsen, C.P.; Lei, Y.; McElroy, M.B.; Hao, J. Quantifying the uncertainties of a bottom-up emission inventory of anthropogenic atmospheric pollutants in China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 2295–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Pollutant | Sugarcane | Rice | Corn | Cassava |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | 0.8 c | 0.64 i | 0.35 d | 0.64 i |
| OC | 3.3 g | 2.01 b | 2.25 b | 2.3 c |
| SO2 | 0.4 c | 0.53 h | 0.44 d | 0.37 i |
| NOX | 3.16 g | 1.81 f | 1.28 f | 3.11 a |
| CO | 40.08 e | 64.2 f | 53 d | 47 h |
| CO2 | 1584 c | 791.3 f | 1261.5 f | 1445 j |
| PM2.5 | 6.3 c | 6.26 a | 11.7 d | 6.79 g |
| PM10 | 8.49 h | 5.78 g | 11.95 h | 6.93 g |
| NH3 | 0.53 h | 0.53 h | 0.68 d | 0.53 h |
| CH4 | 3.9 g | 3.5 j | 4.4 d | 3.5 j |
| NMVOC | 9.42 c | 6.05 c | 10 c | 9.42 c |
| City | BC | OC | SO2 | NOX | CO | CO2 | PM2.5 | PM10 | NH3 | CH4 | NMVOC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanning | 8.71 | 34.54 | 5.70 | 31.64 | 638.33 | 16,380.89 | 90.02 | 102.54 | 7.04 | 48.89 | 107.72 |
| Liuzhou | 4.22 | 16.48 | 2.55 | 15.39 | 277.82 | 7656.16 | 37.65 | 45.01 | 3.10 | 21.92 | 48.56 |
| Guilin | 2.92 | 10.11 | 2.46 | 8.77 | 296.16 | 4350.19 | 33.95 | 32.64 | 2.66 | 17.56 | 32.85 |
| Wuzhou | 1.44 | 4.84 | 1.13 | 4.66 | 137.68 | 2180.41 | 15.33 | 14.74 | 1.24 | 8.18 | 15.93 |
| Beihai | 2.15 | 8.41 | 1.28 | 8.43 | 143.39 | 4188.73 | 20.41 | 23.76 | 1.64 | 11.44 | 26.71 |
| Fangchenggang | 1.75 | 7.10 | 0.98 | 6.71 | 103.50 | 3396.76 | 15.43 | 19.32 | 1.26 | 9.03 | 21.00 |
| Qinzhou | 3.44 | 12.82 | 2.29 | 12.37 | 263.32 | 6052.71 | 33.56 | 36.79 | 2.71 | 18.65 | 40.23 |
| Guigang | 3.94 | 14.35 | 2.85 | 13.47 | 334.73 | 6619.06 | 41.11 | 42.94 | 3.28 | 22.20 | 45.78 |
| Yulin | 3.68 | 12.82 | 2.80 | 11.93 | 332.66 | 5702.53 | 38.12 | 38.27 | 3.08 | 20.66 | 40.61 |
| Baise | 2.79 | 12.05 | 2.14 | 9.88 | 245.74 | 5878.37 | 39.33 | 42.65 | 2.78 | 18.84 | 41.18 |
| Hezhou | 1.15 | 3.95 | 0.94 | 3.57 | 113.47 | 1741.64 | 12.99 | 12.53 | 1.03 | 6.78 | 12.95 |
| Hechi | 3.04 | 12.73 | 2.17 | 11.01 | 245.68 | 6187.58 | 38.01 | 42.12 | 2.78 | 19.04 | 42.12 |
| Laibin | 6.51 | 26.19 | 3.70 | 24.64 | 392.72 | 12,430.29 | 57.25 | 71.13 | 4.68 | 33.54 | 77.18 |
| Chongzuo | 13.16 | 54.09 | 6.91 | 51.48 | 709.21 | 26,010.16 | 109.93 | 143.26 | 9.08 | 66.01 | 157.38 |
| Total | 58.90 | 230.48 | 37.90 | 213.95 | 4234.41 | 108,775.48 | 583.09 | 667.70 | 46.36 | 322.74 | 710.20 |
| Reference | Year | BC | OC | SO2 | NOX | CO | CO2 | PM2.5 | PM10 | NH3 | CH4 | NMVOC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This study | 2017–2021 (average) | 8.02 | 31.39 | 5.15 | 29.16 | 575.38 | 14,816.95 | 79.25 | 90.82 | 6.30 | 43.90 | 96.67 |
| Pan et al. [31] | 2017–2021 (average) | - | - | 1.6 | 7.8 | 129.1 | - | 22.1 | 22.6 | 1.7 | - | 27.7 |
| This study | 2019 | 6.76 | 26.49 | 4.31 | 24.66 | 480.16 | 12,519.61 | 66.32 | 76.33 | 5.28 | 36.86 | 81.42 |
| Liu et al. [34] | 2019 | 19.23 | 8.29 | 10.80 | 51.15 | 807.41 | - | 145.44 | 148.39 | 9.64 | - | 158.58 |
| This study | 2017 | 6.84 | 26.6 | 4.42 | 24.73 | 494.67 | 12,518.09 | 67.37 | 76.86 | 5.37 | 37.37 | 81.87 |
| Zhang et al. [5] | 2017 | 5 | 20 | 5 | 17 | 515 | 10,559 | 56 | 68 | 4 | 34 | 68 |
| This study | 2017 | 6.84 | 26.6 | 4.42 | 24.73 | 494.67 | 12,518.09 | 67.37 | 76.86 | 5.37 | 37.37 | 81.87 |
| Yin et al. [15] | 2003–2017 (average) | 3.6 | 31.6 | 2.7 | 16.5 | 410.1 | 8021.1 | 54.4 | 57.6 | 6.2 | 17 | - |
| This study | 2022 | 9.6 | 37.57 | 6.21 | 34.81 | 694.56 | 17,722.1 | 95.6 | 109.21 | 7.59 | 52.78 | 115.94 |
| Pan et al. [51] | 2022 | - | - | - | - | 314.6 | 7227 | - | - | - | 14.4 | - |
| Parameter | Distribution | Coefficients of Variation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sugarcane | Rice | Corn | Cassava | |||
| Activity data | Crop production | normal | 5% | |||
| Grain-to-straw ratio | 10% | |||||
| Combustion efficiency | 14.38% | 2.34% | 0.95% | 14.47% | ||
| Open burning proportion | 30% | |||||
| EFS | BC | 26.41% | 19.33% | 30.15% | 33.68% | |
| OC | 41.29% | 41.39% | 34.04% | 31.53% | ||
| SO2 | 23.22% | 43.56% | 32.79% | 26.08% | ||
| NOX | 35.75% | 35.00% | 36.03% | 28.82% | ||
| CO | 42.05% | 52.11% | 41.96% | 27.04% | ||
| CO2 | 9.51% | 21.45% | 16.39% | 4.47% | ||
| PM2.5 | 27.30% | 36.05% | 23.06% | 14.56% | ||
| PM10 | 19.67% | 30.22% | 25.67% | 21.69% | ||
| NH3 | 57.60% | 59.78% | 54.19% | 65.19% | ||
| CH4 | 34.42% | 47.54% | 14.80% | 26.40% | ||
| NMVOC | 43.90% | 58.82% | 35.21% | 26.03% | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
He, X.; Yang, D.; Huang, Q.; Liang, C.; Yang, Y.; Xie, G.; Qin, Z.; Pan, R.; Xie, Y. Satellite-Constrained Estimation of Emissions from Crop Residue Open Burning in Guangxi, Southern China (2017–2023). Fire 2026, 9, 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9030132
He X, Yang D, Huang Q, Liang C, Yang Y, Xie G, Qin Z, Pan R, Xie Y. Satellite-Constrained Estimation of Emissions from Crop Residue Open Burning in Guangxi, Southern China (2017–2023). Fire. 2026; 9(3):132. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9030132
Chicago/Turabian StyleHe, Xinjie, Dewei Yang, Qiting Huang, Cunsui Liang, Yingpin Yang, Guoxue Xie, Zelin Qin, Runxi Pan, and Yuning Xie. 2026. "Satellite-Constrained Estimation of Emissions from Crop Residue Open Burning in Guangxi, Southern China (2017–2023)" Fire 9, no. 3: 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9030132
APA StyleHe, X., Yang, D., Huang, Q., Liang, C., Yang, Y., Xie, G., Qin, Z., Pan, R., & Xie, Y. (2026). Satellite-Constrained Estimation of Emissions from Crop Residue Open Burning in Guangxi, Southern China (2017–2023). Fire, 9(3), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9030132
