A Simple Foot Plantar Pressure Measurement Platform System Using Force-Sensing Resistors
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chia, J.K.; Suresh, S.; Kuah, A.; Ong, J.L.; Phua, J.M.; Seah, A.L. Comparative trial of the foot pressure patterns between corrective orthotics, formthotics, bone spur and flat insoles in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. Ann. Acad. Med. Singap. 2009, 38, 869–875. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Periyasamy, R.; Mishra, A.; Anand, S.; Ammini, A.C. Preliminary investigation of foot pressure distribution variation in men and women adults while standing. Foot 2011, 21, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tahmasebi, R.; Karim, M.T.; Satvati, B.; Fatoye, F. Evaluation of standing stability in individuals with flatfeet. Foot Ankle Spec. 2015, 8, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Imizumi, K.; Iwakami, Y.; Yamashita, K.; Hiejima, Y. Development of an evaluation system for foot arch types in the elderly using foot pressure distribution data. Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (EMBC) 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavanagh, P.R.; Rodgers, M. The Arch index: A useful measure from footprints. J. Biomech. 1987, 20, 547–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fawzy, O.A.; Arafa, A.I.; Wakeel, M.A.E.; Kareem, S.H.A. Plantar Pressure as a Risk Assessment Tool for Diabetic Foot Ulceration in Egyptian Patients with Diabetes. Clini. Cal. Med. Insights Endocrinol. Diabetes 2014, 7, CMED-S17088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Kul-Panza, E.; Berker, N. Pedobarographic Findings in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2006, 85, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wibowo, D.B.; Widodo, A.; Haryadi, G.D.; Caesarendra, W.; Harahap, R. Effect of in-shoe foot orthosis contours on heel pain due to calcaneal spurs. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Cross, R. Standing, walking, running, and jumping on a force plate. Am. J. Phys. 1999, 67, 304–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Malvade, P.S.; Joshi, A.K.; Madhe, S.P. IoT Based Monitoring of Foot Pressure Using FSR Sensor. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing, Tamilnadu, India, 6–8 April 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Go-Tec Foot Pressure. Available online: https://www.sensorprod.com/pdf/go-tec-foot-plate.pdf (accessed on 31 January 2020).
- Interlink Electronics, FSR Force Sensing Resistor―Integration Guide and Evaluation Parts Catalog, 400 Series Evaluation Parts with Suggested Electrical Interfaces. Available online: https://www.sparkfun.com/datasheets/Sensors/Pressure/fsrguide.pdf (accessed on 3 August 2020).
- Flórez, J.A.; Velásquez, A. Calibration of force sensing resistors (fsr) for static and dynamic applications. IEEE Andescon 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yung-Hui, L.; Wei-Hsien, H. Effect of shoe inserts and heel height on foot pressure, impact force, and perceived comfort during walking. Appl. Ergon. 2005, 36, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodrigo, A.S.; Goonetilleke, R.S.; Xiong, S. Load distribution to minimize pressure-related pain on foot: A model. Ergonomics 2014, 56, 1180–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Druga, C.; Serban, I. Study of foot pressure-sole pressure sensor. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Mechanics and Virtual Engineering (COMEC) 2017, Brasov, Rumania, 16–17 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Wibowo, D.B.; Suprihanto, A.; Haryanto, I. Body Mass Index Measurement Tool with Software to Evaluate Ideal Body Weight. Patent No. IDS000002589, 4 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Haryadi, G.D.; Wibowo, D.B.; Ariyanto, M.; Suprihanto, A. Digital Scanning Method for Evaluation of Dimensional Parameters and Identification of Foot Type. Patent No. IDS000002253, 2 April 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Wafai, L.; Zayegh, A.; Woulfe, J.; Aziz, S.M.; Begg, R. Identification of Foot Pathologies Based on Plantar Pressure Asymmetry. Sensors 2015, 15, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe, A.; Gual, G.; Romero-Rodriguez, D.; Unnitha, V. Lower Limb Neuromuscular Asymmetry in Volleyball and Basketball Players. J. Hum. Kinet. 2016, 50, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wibowo, D.B.; Suprihanto, A.; Haryadi, G.D. Development of Prototype Scanners for Diagnosis of Foot Anomalies. In Higher Education Applied Research Report (PTUPT); DRPM DIKTI: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
On the Left and Right Leg Soles (cm) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | |
x1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | −1.5 | −1.5 | 1.0 | −2.0 | 1.5 | −0.6 | −3.5 | −3.0 | −0.5 | 2.0 | −0.6 | 2.0 | 2.3 |
x2 | 0.0 | −1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | −1.5 | 0.6 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 0.5 | −2.0 | 0.6 | −2.0 | −2.3 |
y | 3.8 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 9.0 | 9.5 | 11.5 | 12.0 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 16.0 | 16.5 | 16.5 | 19.0 | 19.5 | 23.4 |
No. Subject | Gender (M/F) | Weight Agency (kg) | High Agency (cm) | BMI (kg/m2) | FL (mm) | Shoe Size | FAC (mm2) | Foot Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | M | 52.8 | 171 | 18.1 | 250.0 | 40 | 8505.6 | HA |
2 | F | 64.8 | 175 | 21.2 | 258.0 | 42 | 12,392.0 | NA |
3 | M | 68 | 166 | 24.7 | 257.0 | 42 | 14,204.3 | LA |
4 | M | 71.5 | 171 | 24.3 | 249.1 | 40 | 14,332.1 | NA |
5 | M | 84.7 | 173 | 28.4 | 255.8 | 41 | 14,954.0 | LA |
6 | M | 75.2 | 168 | 26.6 | 255.5 | 41 | 12,038.1 | NA |
7 | F | 71.6 | 168 | 25.5 | 252.0 | 41 | 11,451.4 | HA |
8 | F | 54.4 | 170 | 18.8 | 254.5 | 41 | 12,221.8 | HA |
9 | F | 54.7 | 167 | 19.7 | 249.2 | 40 | 9456.1 | HA |
10 | F | 55.8 | 174 | 18.4 | 255.7 | 41 | 11,029.1 | HA |
No. Subject | Load Per Sensor (Gram) | Total Load Sensor (kg) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | ||
1 | 702 | 210 | 290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 350 | 302 | 540 | 342 | 787 | 3.5 |
2 | 644 | 517 | 437 | 527 | 0 | 363 | 0 | 169 | 0 | 426 | 526 | 429 | 514 | 398 | 516 | 5.5 |
3 | 727 | 583 | 657 | 623 | 0 | 654 | 196 | 454 | 0 | 474 | 643 | 627 | 688 | 592 | 766 | 7.7 |
4 | 731 | 617 | 710 | 686 | 0 | 690 | 0 | 318 | 0 | 457 | 522 | 449 | 673 | 601 | 257 | 6.7 |
5 | 694 | 441 | 662 | 547 | 0 | 557 | 0 | 249 | 0 | 612 | 489 | 278 | 665 | 558 | 424 | 6.2 |
6 | 736 | 700 | 641 | 476 | 0 | 373 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 470 | 438 | 263 | 634 | 471 | 354 | 5.6 |
7 | 706 | 571 | 606 | 550 | 0 | 428 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 283 | 453 | 474 | 723 | 705 | 705 | 6.2 |
8 | 776 | 561 | 467 | 355 | 0 | 334 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 467 | 689 | 545 | 699 | 542 | 756 | 6.2 |
9 | 764 | 574 | 493 | 435 | 0 | 392 | 0 | 0 | 370 | 332 | 325 | 0 | 784 | 656 | 686 | 5.8 |
10 | 654 | 455 | 542 | 540 | 0 | 576 | 0 | 0 | 418 | 270 | 0 | 0 | 578 | 392 | 681 | 5.1 |
No. Subject | Load Per Sensor (Gram) | Total Load Sensor (kg) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | ||
1 | 810 | 567 | 549 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 525 | 714 | 625 | 300 | 737 | 571 | 784 | 6.2 |
2 | 715 | 51 | 692 | 621 | 0 | 535 | 0 | 229 | 676 | 792 | 718 | 681 | 678 | 446 | 631 | 7.5 |
3 | 699 | 739 | 664 | 680 | 479 | 635 | 394 | 625 | 635 | 634 | 572 | 517 | 654 | 623 | 824 | 9.4 |
4 | 785 | 725 | 665 | 614 | 118 | 578 | 0 | 434 | 562 | 574 | 531 | 573 | 666 | 580 | 571 | 8.0 |
5 | 823 | 670 | 740 | 684 | 420 | 626 | 487 | 469 | 612 | 669 | 482 | 511 | 685 | 730 | 641 | 9.2 |
6 | 745 | 649 | 770 | 461 | 381 | 401 | 1 | 513 | 364 | 581 | 694 | 691 | 685 | 551 | 411 | 7.9 |
7 | 819 | 780 | 693 | 632 | 74 | 549 | 0 | 0 | 482 | 617 | 350 | 466 | 762 | 738 | 722 | 7.7 |
8 | 860 | 480 | 639 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 91 | 529 | 550 | 678 | 565 | 530 | 820 | 5.7 |
9 | 721 | 405 | 413 | 387 | 0 | 533 | 0 | 217 | 425 | 721 | 608 | 533 | 788 | 685 | 554 | 7.0 |
10 | 691 | 690 | 429 | 550 | 0 | 418 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 509 | 300 | 900 | 763 | 533 | 464 | 6.2 |
Subject # | Total Load Sensors in Area (Gram) | Total Load All Sensors (kg) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rear Foot | Mid Foot | Front Foot | Thumb Finger | |||||||||||
Left Leg | Right Leg | ASI (%) | Left Leg | Right Leg | ASI (%) | Left Leg | Right Leg | ASI (%) | Left Leg | Right Leg | ASI (%) | Left Leg | Right Leg | |
1 | 1202 | 1926 | 37.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1535 | 3472 | 55.79 | 787 | 784 | −0.4 | 3.5 | 6.2 |
2 | 1598 | 1458 | −9.6 | 890 | 1156 | 23.0 | 2464 | 4220 | 41.61 | 516 | 631 | 18.2 | 5.5 | 7.5 |
3 | 1967 | 2102 | 6.4 | 1473 | 2188 | 32.7 | 3481 | 4260 | 18.29 | 766 | 824 | 7.0 | 7.7 | 9.4 |
4 | 2058 | 2175 | 5.4 | 1376 | 1310 | −5.0 | 3024 | 3920 | 22.86 | 257 | 571 | 55.0 | 6.7 | 8 |
5 | 1797 | 2233 | 19.5 | 1104 | 2217 | 50.2 | 2856 | 4158 | 31.31 | 424 | 641 | 33.9 | 6.2 | 9.2 |
6 | 2077 | 2164 | 4.0 | 849 | 1244 | 31.8 | 2282 | 4079 | 44.05 | 354 | 411 | 13.9 | 5.6 | 7.9 |
7 | 1883 | 2292 | 17.8 | 978 | 1255 | 22.1 | 2647 | 3415 | 22.49 | 705 | 722 | 2.4 | 6.2 | 7.7 |
8 | 1804 | 1979 | 8.8 | 689 | 0 | 0 | 2961 | 2943 | −0.61 | 756 | 820 | 7.8 | 6.2 | 5.7 |
9 | 1831 | 1539 | −19.0 | 827 | 920 | 10.1 | 2476 | 3977 | 37.74 | 686 | 554 | −23.8 | 5.8 | 7 |
10 | 1651 | 1810 | 8.8 | 1116 | 968 | −15.3 | 1668 | 3005 | 44.49 | 681 | 464 | −46.8 | 5.1 | 6.2 |
Type Soles of Foot | Display of Designed Measuring Instruments and MAFPM | Total Load in Each Area of Foot | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
High Arch | | Subject No.: 1; Total load of the foot (gram) | ||
Area | Left | Right | ||
Rear | 1202 | 1926 | ||
Middle | 0 | 0 | ||
Front | 1534 | 3472 | ||
Thumb | 787 | 784 | ||
| Subject No.: 8; Total load of the foot (gram) | |||
Area | Left | Right | ||
Rear | 1804 | 1979 | ||
Middle | 689 | 0 | ||
Front | 2953 | 2943 | ||
Thumb | 756 | 820 | ||
Normal Arch | | Subject No.: 2; Total load of the foot (gram) | ||
Area | Left | Right | ||
Rear | 1598 | 1458 | ||
Middle | 890 | 1156 | ||
Front | 2462 | 4220 | ||
Thumb | 516 | 631 | ||
| Subject No.: 6; Total load of the foot (gram) | |||
Area | Left | Right | ||
Rear | 2077 | 2164 | ||
Middle | 849 | 1243 | ||
Front | 2276 | 4079 | ||
Thumb | 354 | 411 | ||
Low Arch | | Subject No.: 3; Total load of the foot (gram) | ||
Area | Left | Right | ||
Rear | 1967 | 2102 | ||
Middle | 1473 | 2188 | ||
Front | 3478 | 4260 | ||
Thumb | 766 | 824 | ||
| Subject No.: 5; Total load of the foot (gram) | |||
Area | Left | Right | ||
Rear | 1797 | 2233 | ||
Middle | 1104 | 2217 | ||
Front | 2851 | 4158 | ||
Thumb | 424 | 641 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wibowo, D.B.; Suprihanto, A.; Caesarendra, W.; Khoeron, S.; Glowacz, A.; Irfan, M. A Simple Foot Plantar Pressure Measurement Platform System Using Force-Sensing Resistors. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2020, 3, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi3030033
Wibowo DB, Suprihanto A, Caesarendra W, Khoeron S, Glowacz A, Irfan M. A Simple Foot Plantar Pressure Measurement Platform System Using Force-Sensing Resistors. Applied System Innovation. 2020; 3(3):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi3030033
Chicago/Turabian StyleWibowo, Dwi Basuki, Agus Suprihanto, Wahyu Caesarendra, Slamet Khoeron, Adam Glowacz, and Muhammad Irfan. 2020. "A Simple Foot Plantar Pressure Measurement Platform System Using Force-Sensing Resistors" Applied System Innovation 3, no. 3: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi3030033