Next Article in Journal
Molding Process Effects on the Internal Structures of High-Performance Discontinuous Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling the Manufacturing Process of Thin-Walled Composite Parts by Vacuum Infusion Using Controlled External Pressures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heat Treatment of Clay Shales and Their Utilization as Active Mineral Additives for the Production of Composite Cements

by
Baurzhan Amiraliyev
1,*,
Bakhitzhan Taimasov
1,*,
Ekaterina Potapova
2,3,
Bakhitzhan Sarsenbaev
4,
Meiram Begentayev
5,
Mukhtar Dauletiyarov
4,
Aknur Kuandykova
1,
Aidana Abdullin
1,
Nurzhan Ainabekov
6,* and
Sultan Auyesbek
4
1
Department of Silicate Technology and Metallurgy, M. Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Shymkent 160012, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Chemical Technology of Composite and Binding Materials, D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, Moscow 125047, Russia
3
Research Institute “Environmental Industrial Policy Centre”, Moscow 115054, Russia
4
Scientific Research Laboratory «Building Materials, Construction and Architecture», M. Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Shymkent 160012, Kazakhstan
5
Administration Rector’s Office, K.I. Satpayev Kazakh National Research Technical University, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan
6
Centre for Scientific and Analytical Information, M. Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Shymkent 160012, Kazakhstan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9(6), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9060269
Submission received: 14 April 2025 / Revised: 15 May 2025 / Accepted: 18 May 2025 / Published: 28 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Composites Applications)

Abstract

:
A structure of composite cement with 15 wt.% thermally activated clay shales has been developed. The phase composition and properties of aluminosilicate rocks of the Kazakhstan deposits—Mynaral and Kuyuk—have been studied. It has been shown that aluminosilicates are related to clay shales by their composition. The regularities of thermal activation processes of aluminosilicates have been established, and it has been shown that pozzolanic activity increases for all compositions with an increase in the heat treatment temperature from 700 to 900 °C. The clay shale of the Mynaral deposit is characterized by the highest activity. The physicomechanical properties of the obtained composite cements–including Portland cement clinker, gypsum, and thermally activated clay shale—have been studied. It has been shown that when replacing up to 15 wt.% Portland cement clinker with thermally activated clay shales, there is no decrease in the strength properties of the composite cement. The obtained results allow us to consider heat-treated clay shales as active mineral additives.

1. Introduction

The most common building material is concrete. The first mention of it dates back to 5600 BC. In those distant times, the binder was lime. And only 200 years ago, a new unique binder appeared—Portland cement—which is produced today at more than 4 billion tons.
Over the past 100 years, concrete has revolutionized the global construction environment. All over the world, concrete structures play a key role in providing housing for an ever-growing population; providing transport on land, at sea, and in the air; supporting energy production and industry; and providing protection. Without Portland cement concrete, it would be impossible to build roads and railways, bridges and dams, high-rise buildings, and skyscrapers, and any reinforced concrete structures would not be possible. Today, concrete and cement mortars remain economical and energy-efficient building materials.
However, cement production is characterized by high emissions of CO2, a greenhouse gas, since the main raw materials for the production of cement clinker are carbonate-containing rocks, the decomposition of which releases CO2. In addition, the high temperatures of cement clinker production require high fuel consumption, the combustion of which also produces carbon dioxide.
The cement industry is estimated to account for ~7–8% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions worldwide. With the world’s population set to grow to 9.8 billion people by 2050, the demand for cement will continue to increase since, by that time, 68% of the population will live in cities. If the world continues to strive to achieve its climate goals, the issue of reducing such emissions will become acute [1].
Since 1 January 2019, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) has transferred the Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI) to the Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA). The activities of the CSI focus on the carbon footprint of the industry [2]. All CSI members continuously reduce CO2 emissions at their plants, measure emissions, and report them using an agreed methodology and key performance indicators (KPIs).
To support these activities, CSI has created a global database of CO2 emissions and energy efficiency reports from cement plants. This voluntary database provides standardized, accurate, and verified information to help the industry understand its current and future performance potential.
The European Cement Industry Bureau Cembureau has prepared the 2050 ROADMAP to identify the potential for reducing CO2 emissions across the entire cement and concrete value chain. The main conclusion of the strategy is that CO2 emissions can be reduced by acting at every stage of the value chain—clinker production, cement, concrete, construction, and (re)carbonation—to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 [3,4].
The following directions for reducing CO2 emissions are presented [5,6,7,8]: savings in clinker production; savings in cement and binders; the efficiency of concrete production; carbon capture, use, and storage; the decarbonization of electricity; recarbonization—the natural process of CO2 absorption by concrete; and efficiency of design and construction. If these steps are not taken, according to forecasts, CO2 emissions will increase by 2050 to 3.8 Gt [5]. The implementation of existing and development of innovative mitigation technologies will require significant funding.
Different countries are looking for different approaches to reducing CO2 emissions, but the most easily feasible technological solutions should be used first.
The Republic of Kazakhstan (RK), like the entire world community, adheres to the principles of the Paris Agreement on making a national contribution to achieving sustainable development goals and holding back the increase in global average temperatures, and aims to implement measures to fulfill state environmental policy reduce the negative impact on the environment, and preserve natural resources for future generations of the Republic of Kazakhstan [9,10,11].
Thus, in accordance with the National Carbon Quota Plan for 2022–2025 approved by the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan [12] and the Environmental Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 9 January 2007 (subparagraph 7; Article 16), the total volume of quotas for greenhouse gas emissions in regulated areas of activity amounts to 108.8 million tons, including for the manufacturing industry (in particular, the production of building materials—cement, lime, gypsum, and brick). Including quotas for CO2 emissions from cement plants amount to 6.02 million tons for 2022; 5.55 million tons in 2023; 5.5 million tons in 2024; and 5.2 million tons in 2025 [12]. The volume of quotas allocated to cement industry enterprises for 2023–2025 is presented in Figure 1 (using four cement enterprises of the Republic of Kazakhstan as an example).
Each cement plant in the Republic of Kazakhstan has its own quotas, which are most likely determined by the level of CO2 emissions at a given plant. However, all enterprises in the industry face the task of reducing CO2 emissions during cement production in one way or another. Therefore, a relevant and inexpensive measure may be the production of composite cements with the partial replacement of the clinker share in cement to maintain and increase the annual volume of manufactured products, which are urgently needed by builders.
One of the areas of solving energy saving and ecology issues in cement production is waste recycling, replacing a portion of the clinker with a high-cost price with natural or artificial parts, i.e., natural or man-made additives, obtaining low-clinker cements [13,14]. Additives are not available in all regions where cement plants are located. The most accessible today are pozzolans, blast furnaces, phosphorus slags, ashes, etc. The task of researchers is to find and increase the range and volume of high-quality mineral additives. Moreover, these materials should be located near cement production in order to reduce logistic costs.
One of the ways to reduce the amount of harmful emissions released into the atmosphere, including carbon dioxide released during the production of Portland cement clinker, is to use active mineral additives, which will reduce the proportion of the clinker used in the cement. That is, it is necessary to develop effective compositions of composite cements in parts of the expensive clinker that are replaced by active mineral additives. Reducing the proportion of the clinker accordingly reduces the volume of CO2 emissions into the atmosphere. This is a pressing global problem that is causing concern in Europe, the USA, China, and all other countries on the planet [15,16].
In recent years, the global cement industry has paid much attention to mineral additives. This is not a new direction because, for several decades, standards have allowed the use of limestone, slag, pozzolana, ash, and dust as additives. But the renewed interest in optimizing the use of these materials can be considered relevant today. The use of additional raw materials here—such as mineral additives—allows not only to reduce the cost of cement (in most cases, these materials are much cheaper than clinker) but also to reduce the specific amount of CO2 emissions [17].
To significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere, it is also possible to obtain composite cement clinkers based on various industrial wastes [18]. Thus, phosphorus and blast furnace slag, with the partial replacement of natural raw materials in the batch for obtaining the clinker, reduce heat consumption for the decomposition of carbonates; the specific consumption of raw materials per 1 ton of clinker decreases; and the mass of material that must be heated to the sintering temperature of the clinker also decreases. As a result, the firing temperature and fuel consumption decrease, which leads to a reduction in CO2 emissions [19,20].
Potapova E.N. et al. [21] investigated the pozzolanic activity of three mineral additives—metakaolin, diatomaceous earth, and silica gel—using various methods for determining pozzolanic activity. It was found that metakaolin showed the highest activity in absorbing lime from lime mortar. The results of determining the activity of additives by the express method obtained by the authors correlated well with the results of the Frattini method. The express methods for determining activity proposed by the authors and developed by Strokova V.V. et al. can be used not only for highly active AMA (active mineral additives) but also for less active AMA. In this case, it is possible to use the classical method.
Mechai A.A. et al. proposed introducing dehydrated clay, and dolomite was proposed as a carbonate rock [22]. The authors determined the pozzolanic activity of mineral additives from four Belarusian deposits. In order to increase pozzolanic activity, the authors carried out the heat treatment of mineral additives. As a result of the experiments, it was revealed that the types of clay from the Lukoml deposit, heat-treated at a temperature of 900 °C, have the highest pozzolanic activity.
Yakubzhanova Z.B. [23] studied the chemical–mineralogical, physicochemical, and technological properties of glyage-like rock mass and basaltic andesite, on the basis of which the compositions of hybrid additives “glyage + phosphozol” and “glyage + basaltic andesite” with a high glyage content (up to 20%) were developed. The physicomechanical properties of Portland cement were studied with the replacement of up to 30% of clinkers with hybrid additives. The possibility of obtaining new types of composite Portland cements of the PC400-KD30 brands with hybrid additives with a high glyage content due to the targeted regulation of the hydration process, the synthesis of crystalline products, and the formation of a dense low-porosity composite were shown.
Yuldashev F.T. proposed using man-made waste, in particular, the active mineral additive “Phosphozol” and ash and slag waste up to 20% by weight, to improve the environmental situation in cement production.
Mukhiddinov D.D. proposed complex additives, including microsilica and ash-slag. At a dosage of more than 25%, the strength of the resulting cements did not decrease.
Atabaev F.B. studied the hydraulic activity of raw materials in order to determine the possibility of their use as an active mineral additive, including the partial replacement of the clinker component and improvement of the performance properties of cements. Substandard foundry slags from the machine-building and metallurgical (Bekabad metal plant) industries and small waste from soda plants obtained during the slaking of lime together with waste from marble production, used as fillers, were used as hydraulic additives. It has been established that the introduction of 10% of marble by weight into the composition of slag cement increases its strength.
Cherkasov V.D. et al. developed effective active mineral additives based on chemically modified diatomite and studied the processes of hydration and structure formation of cement composites with the addition of modified diatomite.
Konan K.L. et al. studied the processes of obtaining the hydration and hardening of composite cements with the addition of metakaolin, kaolin, etc.
The presented results show that composite cements are quite widespread in many countries of the world; their use allows manufacturers to effectively save on expensive clinkers while reducing carbon dioxide emissions. In this regard, the following can be noted:
  • One of the most relevant and widespread areas today to ensure the sustainable production of Portland cement and energy conservation, solving environmental problems, is the replacement of part of the clinker in Portland cement with natural active mineral additives;
  • Portland cement with active mineral additives is an easily produced and in-demand material today;
  • Research on the development of composite cements is aimed not only at reducing the cost of Portland cement and improving environmental conditions but also at ensuring the high quality of the resulting products and using local reserves of available raw materials;
  • Studies on the use of clay shales are isolated and contradictory.
At the cement plants of Kazakhstan LLP “Gezhuba Shieli Cement”, LLP “Semey Cement”, LLP “Caspian Cement”, and others, when producing composite cements, CEM II/A-K, CEM II/V-K, granulated slags, shale, limestone, and fly ash are used. Clay shales are quite common in the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan, but at the moment, they are used as raw material (aluminosilicate) components in the production of Portland cement clinker.
Clay shales are rocks of metamorphic origin. The structure is shale. They consist of very small particles of clay minerals and quartz impurities. Distinguishing features are easy for separation into long individual columns and tiles under mechanical impact. The texture is shale with a parallel arrangement of shells and embroidered minerals. Rocks crystallize partially or completely with a change in mineral composition and without changes. In weakly metamorphosed rocks, hidden crystalline or transitional structures are found, including relict ones, which are subject to metamorphism.
Since clay shales, according to their chemical and mineralogical composition, are aluminosilicates, it can be assumed that during their thermal activation, like clays, amorphous aluminum and silicon oxides are formed, which are capable of reacting with the portlandite of cement stone to form an additional amount of calcium hydrosilicates and hydroaluminates.
Heat-treated clay shale is quite effective and is used as an active mineral additive in some foreign plants. AMA replaces clinkers, increases the strength of Portland cement, and optimally affects the processes of grinding clinkers and the formation of the structure of hardening cement stone.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

In this work, clay shales from two deposits—Mynaral and Kuyuk (Republic of Kazakhstan, Zhambyl region)—, as well as clinker of JSC “Shymkent Cement”, were used to obtain composite cements. The study of clay shales as a mineral additive was carried out in accordance with the requirements of *GOST 25094-2015 Active mineral additives for cements. The method for determining their activity is given below [24].

2.2. Instrumental Methods of Analysis

Chemical analysis according to **GOST 5382-2019 Cements and materials for cement production. Methods of chemical analysis [25].

2.3. X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis (XRF)

The concentration of elements in the samples was determined by X-ray spectral fluorescence analysis (XRF) on a vacuum spectrometer of sequential action with wavelength dispersion and the model Axiosm AX, manufactured by PANalytical (The Netherlands). The spectrometer is equipped with a 4 kW X-ray tube with a Rh anode. The maximum voltage on the tube is 60 kV, and the maximum anode current is 160 mA. The analysis was performed according to the methods approved by the Federal Scientific and Methodological Center for Laboratory Research and Certification of Mineral Resources. The applied methods ensured the obtaining of results with the III accuracy category of quantitative analysis according to GOST 41-08-205-04 [26]. This accuracy category is used for the mass analysis of mineral substance samples, the calculation of mineral reserves, and control analyses. Details about the analysis procedure are as follows: air-dried samples were ground in a disk vibratory mill to a powder state, after which preparations were made from the obtained powders by cold pressing under a pressure of 35 tons into tablets with a diameter of 32 mm. Highly pure powdered wax was used as a binding agent.
The obtained tablet preparations were placed in a spectrometer to measure the fluorescence intensity of the analyzed elements and background radiation. Then, the measured analytical signals from each element were recalculated into concentrations using calibration models, i.e., linear regression equations constructed using the external standard method. For a complete description of the chemical composition of the samples, a preliminary qualitative analysis was performed in the range of elements from F to U in order to select a group of multi-element analysis methods listed below.

2.4. X-Ray Phase Analysis (XRF)

The mineralogical composition was determined by the X-ray phase analysis method on the DRON-3 X-ray (Moscow, Russia) apparatus in the laboratory of the Sapa test center of the M. Auezov South Kazakhstan University and on the Bruker AXS D8 installation (Karlsruhe, Germany). The DRON-3 installation allows for X-ray structural studies of various materials, determining the qualitative and quantitative phase composition and analyzing the structure of substances. The equipment operates under the following conditions: ambient temperature 10–35 °C; relative humidity at 25 °C and up to 80%; and atmospheric pressure 630–800 mm. criticism. gr. X-ray tubes 1.5 BSB 23-Cu were used for the X-ray structural analysis.
The X-ray diffractometry device was also used for the analysis of poly- and monocrystalline substances of both bulk and thin-film types. This method allows us to determine chemical compounds in the sample in polycrystalline forms, the atomic structure of individual compounds, the indices of elementary cells of spatial lattices, their sizes and shapes, and Syngonium, which is within the limits.
The X-ray phase analysis of clay shale (X-ray Diffractometry) was carried out on the Bruker AXS D8 setup (Karlsruhe, Germany). The setup operated on a copper (Cu) anode and a VANTEC PSD detector: Scale-2-θ, start-5.000, end-69.996, Step-0.008. The step time was 182.6 s. The studies were carried out in partnership with the scientific equipment of the Technical University of Munich (Munich, Germany).

2.5. Determination of the Activity of Mineral Additives Using the Classical Method

The activity of mineral additives was determined by the lime absorption method. The method is based on determining the amount of lime absorbed over a certain period of time. The activity of the burnt clay shales of Mynaral and Kuyuk was determined by titration. The duration of the experiment was 30 days; titration was carried out periodically every two or three days; and the obtained data were recorded in a table to determine the activity of mineral additives.

2.6. Physical and Mechanical Tests

Physical and mechanical tests were carried out in accordance with the requirements of GOST 310.1-81 and 310.3-81 [27,28]. A cement paste of normal density was prepared in a spherical bowl. Cement mortar was prepared in a laboratory automated mixer ALS-5.
The normal density of the cement paste was determined using a Vicat device; the compressive and bending strength were determined on prism samples measuring 40 × 40 × 160 mm.
In accordance with the requirements of the Test Methods for GOST 310.4-81 [29] Cements, The compressive strength of cement without additives (control) was tested for 18 days on a small-sized hydraulic press PGM-100 MG-4a with a load limit of up to 100 kN; the compressive strength limits were established. In addition, the density and moisture capacity of cement stones and softening coefficients in accordance with GOST 12730.1-2020 [30] and GOST 12730.3-2020 [31] of cubic cement samples were determined. The density value was calculated as the ratio of the mass of the cement stone sample compared to the volume (g/cm3).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Composition of Materials Used

The chemical analysis of the average composition of the materials used was studied in the accredited laboratory of Testing Regional Laboratory—IRLIP. The results are presented in Table 1.
The results of scanning electron microscopy and X-ray fluorescence analysis of the materials used are presented in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4.
The X-ray phase analysis of Portland cement CEM I 42.5N (Figure 5a) confirmed that it contains the following main minerals and dihydrate gypsum: alite 3CaO·SiO2:d/n—2.79; 2.77; 2.57; 2.25; 2.97; 1.73; 3.05 Å; belite 2CaO·SiO2:d/n—2.79; 2.77; 2.31; 2.43; 2.86; 1.82; Å; tetracalcium aluminoferrite 4CaO·Al2O3·Fe2O3:d/n—2.64; 1.82; 1.54; 1.92 Å; tricalcium aluminate 3CaO·Al2O3:d/n—2.16; 4.09; 1.91 Å; and gypsum CaSO4·2H2O: d/n –2.88; 3.07; 2.69 Å.
The following diffraction maxima were recorded in the X-ray diffraction pattern of the Mynaral clay shale (Figure 5b): quartz-SiO2: d/n—3.35; 1.814; 1.538 Å; hydromica (K<1Al2[OH]2(AlSi3O10)·nH2O): d/n—3.141; 4.42; 1.484; 2.103; 2.546 Å; chlorite (Mg,Fe)6−2x(Al, Fe)2x[OH]8(Si4−2xAl2x)O10:d/n—7.02; 3.54; 4.68; 1.536 Å; kaolinite (Al2[OH]4Si2O5):d/n—7.15; 3.56; 2.49; 2.34 Å; calcite CaCO3:d/n—3.03; 1.868; 1.913; 2.087 Å; hematite-Fe2O3:d/n– 2697; 2519; 1.835; 1.688; 1.484 Å; and rutile TiO2: d/n—2.188; 1.664; 3.243; 1.623 Å. The obtained X-ray diffraction pattern indicates the polymineral composition of clay shales. The mineralogical composition of clay shale, wt.%, is as follows: quartz—26.52, kaolinite—12, calcite—7.23, chlorite—15, hydromica—39.09, rutile—0.16.
The following diffraction maxima were recorded in the X-ray diffraction pattern of the Kuyuk clay shale as follows (Figure 5c): quartz-SiO2: d/n—3.26; 1.813; 1.539 Å; hydromica (K<1Al2[OH]2(AlSi3O10)·nH2O): d/n—3.05; 4.41; 1.483; 2.104; 2.545 Å; chlorite (Mg,Fe)6−2x(Al, Fe)2x[OH]8(Si4−2xAl2x)O10:d/n—7.04; 3.54; 4.71; 1.538 Å; kaolinite (Al2[OH]4Si2O5) d/n—7.14; 3.54; 2.47; 2.35 Å; calcite CaCO3: d/n—3.028; 1.868; 1.913; Å; hematite-Fe2O3: d/n– 2.697; 2.519; 1.835; 1.687 Å; and rutile TiO2: d/n– 3.242; 2.187; 1.687; 1.624 Å. Shale is a polymineral rock containing the following (%): quartz—27.29, kaolinite—13, calcite—6.49, chlorite—16, hydromica—36.26, and rutile—0.96.
The diffraction pattern of clay shale from Kuyuk (Figure 6), obtained on an X-ray Diffractometry device with a Bruker AXS D8 attachment, shows the following minerals:

3.2. Thermal Activation of Clay Shales

The experimental part of this work presents the main physicochemical changes occurring during the firing of clay shales at temperatures of 700–900 °C. For this purpose, the clay shales were pre-crushed and then abraded on a disk abrader to a particle size of 2–5 mm. Then, the material was dried in a SNOL-3.5/3m drying cabinet at a temperature of 90 °C for 1 h.
The firing of clay shales was carried out in an SNOL 7.2/1100 electric furnace at temperatures of 700 °C, 800 °C, and 900 °C. Isothermal holding at these temperatures was 1 h.
The cements were obtained by the joint grinding of the starting materials for 30 min to a specific surface area of 4100 to 4200 cm2/g. The amount of burnt clay shale introduced during grinding ranged from 5 to 15%.
The normal density of cement pastes without shale additives, with the addition of 5–15% Mynaral shale, was 27–28%, and 27.3% with Kuyuk shale. With an increase in the shale dosage to 15%, the water requirement of the paste increased to 27.5%.
An X-ray analysis of the burnt clay shale was performed. The main physicochemical changes occurring during shale firing were studied using X-ray analysis.
The studies were carried out using the equipment of the Central Laboratory of Certification Testing of Building Materials, Kazakhstan, Almaty—TselSIM (Figure 7a) and the Center for Collective Use of the Mendeleyev Russian Chemical Technical University, Moscow—RCTU (Figure 7b).
The X-ray diffraction pattern of Mynaral clay shales fired at 900 °C (Figure 7a,b) shows the diffraction maxima of the following minerals: β-quartz-SiO2 d/n—4.27; 3.34; 2.458; 2.282; 1.817, 1.543Å; anhydrous mica (K<1Al2(AlSi3O10) d/n—3.13; 4.51; 1.4834; 2.132; 2.52 Å; chlorite (Mg, Fe)6−2x(Al, Fe)2x(Si4−2xAl2x)O10 d/n—3.4571; 1.543 Å; hematite-Fe2O3—2.7004; 1.8211; 1.693; 1.483 Å; and rutile TiO2 d/n—2.132; 1.693; 3.241Å.
The X-ray diffraction pattern of the Kuyuk clay shale (Figure 8) fired at 900 °C shows diffraction maxima of the following minerals: α-quartz-SiO2 d/n—3.34; 1.813; 1.534; 1.372; 1.380 Å, chlorite, (Mg,Fe)6−2x(Al, Fe)2x(Si4−2xAl2x)O10 d/n—13.86; 1.538; 7.02; 4.68; 3.534 Å.

3.3. Pozzolanic Activity

The pozzolanic activity of thermally activated clay shales was determined by the absorption of Ca(OH)2. It was found that at temperatures below 700 °C, heat-treated clay shales did not have pozzolanic activity. It makes no sense to fire shales above 900 °C since, at this temperature, the crystalline phase of mullite begins to form. The results obtained are shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10.
As can be seen from the presented data, during the firing of Mynaral shale at 700 °C, its activity changed from 26 to 27 mg; when fired at 800 °C, its activity changed to 31–31.5 mg; and at a temperature of 900 °C, its activity changed up to 34.4 mg CaO (Figure 9). Burnt Kuyuk shale, fired at 900 °C, absorbs up to 27–28.2 mg CaO (Figure 10). It is evident that at any temperature of heat treatment for Kuyuk shale, the amount of absorbed lime does not change—the curve reaches a plateau, while for Mynaral clay shale, processed at 900 °C, the absorption curve tends to increase.

3.4. Properties of Blended Cements

The effect of thermally activated clay shale additives on cement properties was investigated. The shale content varied from 5 to 25%, replacing the corresponding portion of cement with it.
The compressive strength of cement without additives (control) for 28 days was 48 MPa. The introduction of heat-treated clay shale practically does not change the water–cement ratio but leads to an insignificant increase in both the beginning and end of the setting time of the cement mortar. At the same time, the strength properties of the composite cement are somewhat improved. The maximum compressive strength was shown by cement with the 15% Mynaral additive—51 MPa—and the maximum strength value of the fired clay shale Kuyuk was 49 MPa.
The results of the physical and mechanical tests of composite cements with additives of thermally activated Mynaral shale are shown in Table 2 and Figure 11, and cements with additives of thermally activated Kuyuk shale are shown in Table 3 and Figure 12.
The introduction of 5–15% of Mynaral shale fired at 700–900 °C into composite cement increases the strength of the cement stone at all stages of hardening. The best strength indicators are demonstrated by cements with the addition of 15% of Mynaral shale fired at 900 °C. The strength at the age of 3–28 days is 5–6.2% higher than that of the control samples. This can be explained by the compaction of the cement stone structure due to the formation of an additional amount of calcium hydrosilicates and hydroaluminates during the interaction of fired shale minerals with Ca(OH)2.
This is proven, among other things, by the high activity of Mynaral shale fired at 900 °C as a mineral additive by the absorption method with lime from lime mortar. The amount of absorbed CaO at the age of 30 days was 33.0–34.4 mg.
As can be seen from the data in Table 3, the normal density of the cement paste is 27–28%. The setting times of all cements meet the requirements of GOST**. Increasing the dosage of burnt Kuyuk shale from 5 to 15% slightly slows down the beginning and end of the setting of the cement paste. The strength of composite cements depends both on the firing temperature of the Kuyuk clay shale and on the dosage of the burnt additive. With an increase in the shale dosage, the average density of the cement stone decreases monotonously from the initial 2250 g/cm3 to 2145—2200 g/cm3. Increasing the firing temperature of the Kuyuk shale clearly increases the strength of the cement stone. However, the strength of the samples with the addition of burnt shale is slightly lower than that of the control samples. The best strength indicators at 28 days of age are shown by cements with the introduction of 15% burnt Kuyuk shale compared to samples containing 5 and 10% of the additive.
The lower strength of cements with Kuyuk shale additives is explained by the lower absorption of CaO from the lime solution. According to our data, it was 27.4–28.2 mg CaO after 30 days, which is significantly less than that of Mynaral shale (33–34.3 mg).
X-ray diffraction patterns of cement stone hardened for 28 days, both without additives and with 15% Mynaral clay shale, fired at 700–900 °C, are shown in Figure 13.
The additive-free cement stone is represented by hardened hydrosilicate gel and hydroaluminates of various compositions. Ettringite is not observed, and calcium monosulfohydroaluminate is formed. Portlandite crystals and the original unreacted phases of belite and alite are present, as well as single crystals of dicalcium hydrosilicates of type A.
Cement stone containing 10% of Mynaral clay shales fired at a temperature of 700 °C contains a smaller amount of Ca(OH)2, and the content of calcium hydrosilicates increases. For a composition containing 10% of shales thermally activated at 800 and 900 °C, the amount of portlandite is even lower.

3.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Using a scanning electron microscope, a study was conducted on the microstructure of hydrated cement stone without additives and with additives of 5–15% Mynaral shale, fired at 700–900 °C (Figure 14 and Figure 15).
The physical structure of hardened cement stone is a dense mass of hydrated solid phases with pores of various sizes. The solid mass of hydrates consists of crystals of various shapes, amorphous granules, and cement stone and also contains particles of unhydrated clinkers. Individual crystals in the mass of cement stone can form crystalline growths, which are especially noticeable within the section of the cement stone filler and in the pores.
Since the strength of cement stone is determined by its physical structure, its strength characteristics correlate with the hydration of the solid phase or the porosity of the material.
The structure is dense, with low porosity. The porosity content in the obtained samples of cement stone is 3%. A structure with the densest mass is formed, in which the contacts between particles are high. The main binding function here is performed by hydrosilicate gel.
In the micrograph of cement stone without additives (Figure 16), there are crystals of portlandite Ca(OH)2 in the form of colorless crystals. The main mass is represented by hardened hydrosilicate gel. In small quantities, in cement stone without additives, there is dicalcium hydrosilicate-type C2SH (A) in the form of colorless rhombic prisms. The microstructure of cement stone without additives of the resulting mixture is dense and uniform.
As can be seen in the micrograph (Figure 17), the main mass of cement stone containing 15% of Mynaral clay shale fired at 900 °C is dense hydrosilicate. The content of C2SH (A) is low compared to cement stone without additives. This cement stone has the highest indicator in the process of determining the compressive strength, which is confirmed by the optimality of the structure from the point of view of microscopic studies.
Cement stone with the addition of 15% Mynaral clay shale, fired at 900 °C, contains a very small amount of calcium monosulphate hydrosulphoaluminate in the form of colorless hexagonal plates, 3CaO·CaSO4·12H2O, of ettringite in the form of colorless long needle-shaped crystals, 3CaO·Al2O3·3CaSO4·31H2O, and white unfermented calcite, CaCO3. Visible (on the right) is the dissolution of a large crystal of portlandite due to the interaction of Ca(OH)2 with amorphous silicon and aluminum oxides from thermally activated shale.

3.6. Approximate Calculation of Reduction in CO2 Emissions from Production of 1 Ton of Composite Cement with Addition of 15% Burnt Shale

The production of composite cements with burnt shale is planned to be implemented at Shymkentcement LLP. According to calculations at this plant, when producing 1 ton of clinker, carbon dioxide emissions amount to 776 kg of CO2. The introduction of 15% of the active mineral additive of burnt clay shale from Mynaral during the grinding of composite cement allows the clinker component to be reduced in the production of this cement by 15%.
Thus, a reduction in the proportion of the clinker in composite cement by 15% due to the introduction of a mineral additive allows CO2 emissions into the atmosphere to be reduced by the same amount.
When producing 1 ton of composite cement with the addition of 15% burnt shale, the emissions are as follows:
776 kg − (776 × 0.15) = 659.6 kg of CO2 per ton of composite cement.
The reduction in emissions due to the use of the 15% mineral additive developed is the following:
776 − 659.6 = 116.4 kg per ton of cement.
With an annual production of, for example, 1,000,000 tons of composite cement, the reduction in emissions is the following:
1,000,000 × 0.1164 = 116,400 tons of CO2.

4. Conclusions

The chemical and mineralogical composition of the raw materials used in the research work was fully studied using the physicochemical methods of SEM, XRD, DTA, and IR. The clay shales of the Mynaral deposit and the Kuyuk deposit consist mainly of quartz, clay minerals (hydromica, chlorite, kaolinite), small amounts of calcite, hematite, and rutile minerals. The Mynaral clay shales contain 70.41% SiO2, 10.38% Al2O3, 10.64% FeO, and 5.38% CaO and, by their chemical composition, are suitable for use as an active mineral additive to clinker in cement production.
During the firing of Mynaral shale at 700 °C, its activity increases to 26–27 mg at a firing temperature of 800 °C to 31–31.5 mg and at a temperature of 900 °C up to 34.4 mg CaO. The fired shale of the Kuyuk deposit absorbs up to 27–28.2 mg CaO.
The introduction of Mynaral shale fired at 700–900 °C in an amount of 5–15% into composite cement increases the strength of cements at the age of 3–28 days by 5–6.2%. This can be explained by the compaction of the structure of the cement stone due to the formation of an additional amount of calcium hydrosilicates during the interaction of the minerals of the fired shale with Ca(OH)2.
The thermal activation of mineral additives does not require significant additional fuel and energy costs. The thermal treatment of shale can be carried out by introducing finely crushed shale onto a clinker layer in the kiln cooler. The result is an active mineral additive with low cost and high quality.
Reducing the proportion of the clinker in composites of Portland cement by 15% will reduce CO2 emissions into the atmosphere. With the production of 1 million tons of cement, CO2 emissions will decrease by 116,400 tons.
Heat-treated clay shales at a temperature of 900 °C have high pozzolanic activity.
The obtained physical and mechanical strength indicators of cement stone with additives of 15% heat-treated Mynaral shale at a temperature of 900 °C correspond to the material composition of general construction cements according to the GOST 31108–2020 [32] General construction cements CEM II/A-Sl.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.A., B.T., E.P. and M.B.; Methodology, B.A. and B.S.; Software, M.D. and A.K.; Validation, B.A., B.T. and E.P.; Formal analysis, E.P. and A.A.; resources, N.A.; Data curation, B.A. and B.T.; Writing—original draft preparation, A.A.; Writing—review and editing, B.A., B.T. and E.P.; Visualization, S.A., M.D. and A.K.; Supervision, E.P., N.A. and B.T.; Project administration, S.A., M.B., B.S. and M.D.; Funding acquisition, E.P., B.T. and E.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. BR21882292—“Integrated development of sustainable construction industries: innovative technologies, optimization of production, effective use of resources and creation of technological park”).

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hegde, S.B. Cement Industry Striving for Carbon Neutrality. Cem. Its Appl. 2023, 1, 66–69. Available online: https://en.jcement.ru/magazine/598/56349/ (accessed on 1 November 2023).
  2. GCCA Sustainability Guidelines for the Monitoring and Reporting of CO2 Emissions from Cement Manufacturing. October 2019. Available online: https://gccassociation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GCCA_Guidelines_CO2Emissions_v04_AMEND.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2019).
  3. CEMBUREAU. 2020. Activity Report. N° Editeur: D/2021/5457/May. Available online: https://www.cembureau.eu/media/1sjf4sk4/cembureau-activity-report-2020.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  4. Available online: https://gccassociation.org/concretefuture/ (accessed on 12 October 2021).
  5. Available online: https://gccassociation.org/concretefuture/getting-to-net-zero/ (accessed on 12 October 2021).
  6. Rocha, J.H.A.; Filho, R.D.T.; Cayo-Chileno, N.G. Sustainable alternatives to CO2 reduction in the cement industry: A short review. Mater. Proc. 2022, 57, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bashmakov, I.A.; Potapova, E.N.; Borisov, K.B.; Lebedev, O.V.; Guseva, T.V. Cement Sector Decarbonization and Development of Environmental and Energy Management Systems. Stroit. Mater. 2023, 9, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Potapova, E.N.; Guseva, T.V.; Tolstykh, T.O.; Bubnov, A.G. Technological, technical, organizational and managerial solutions for the sustainable development and decarbonization of cement sector. Tech. Technol. Silic. 2023, 30, 104–115. [Google Scholar]
  9. Environmental Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan Dated 2 January 2021 No. 400-VI ZRC. Astana. 2020 (with Amendments and Additions as of 12 December 2024). [Ekologicheskii Kodeks Respubliki Kazahstan]. Available online: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K2100000400 (accessed on 2 January 2021).
  10. Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 28 October 2021 No. 775 ‘On Approval of the Rules for Development, Application, Monitoring and Revision of Best Available Techniques Guides’. Astana. RK. 2021. [Ob Utverjdenii PRAVIL RAZRABOTKIPrimeneniya_ Monitoringa i Peresmotra Spravochnikov po Nailuchshim Dostupnim Tehnikam]. Available online: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2100000775 (accessed on 28 October 2021).
  11. On Approval of the Best Available Techniques Guide ‘Cement and Lime Production’ Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan Dated 24 October 2023 No. 941. Astana. RK. 2021. [Proizvodstvo Cementa i Izvesti]. Available online: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2300000941 (accessed on 24 October 2023).
  12. Order of the Minister of Ecology, Geology and Natural Resources of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 11 July 2022 No. 525 ‘On Approval of the National Carbon Plan’. [Ob Utverjdenii Nacionalnogo Plana Uglerodnih Kvot]. Available online: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V2200028798 (accessed on 11 July 2022).
  13. Ozerova, E.M.; Kaigorodov, O.N. Waste utilisation in the Russian cement industry. Cem. Its Appl. 2020, 4, 33–35, [Ispolzovanie Othodov v Rossiiskoi Cementnoi Promishlennosti]. Available online: https://jcement.ru/magazine/vypusk-4-2020/ispolzovanie-otkhodov-v-rossiyskoy-tsementnoy-promyshlennosti/ (accessed on 4 November 2020).
  14. Abramson, I.G. Problems and prospects of the sustainable development of the basic building materials industry/I. G. Abramson. Cem. Its Appl. 2007, 6, 123–128, [Problemi i perspektivi ustoichivogo razvitiya industrii osnovnih stroitelnih materialov]. Available online: https://jcement.ru/magazine/vypusk-6-239/problemy-i-perspektivy-ustoychivogo-razvitiya-industrii-osnovnykh-stroitelnykh-materialov/ (accessed on 6 November 2007).
  15. Fantini, M.; Spinelli, M.; Malli, F.; Gatti, M.; Consonni, S. CLEANKER project: CO2 capture in the cement industry. Cem. Its Appl. 2020, 2, 78–80, [Proekt CLEANKER_ulavlivanie SO2 v cementnoi promishlennosti]. Available online: https://jcement.ru/magazine/vypusk-2-2020/proekt-cleanker-ulavlivanie-co-v-tsementnoy-promyshlennosti/ (accessed on 2 November 2020).
  16. Magistri, M. The Challenge of Low Clinker Cements. Magistri, M., D’Arcangelo, P., Padovani, D., Eds.; Ibausil. September 2023. Available online: https://cadd.mapei.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/The-challenge-of-low-clinker-cements-Ibausil-September-2023.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2023).
  17. Gapparov, J.; Syrlybekkyzy, S.; Filin, A.; Kolesnikov, A.; Zhatkanbayev, Y. Overview of techniques and methods of processing the waste of stale clinkers of zinc production. MIAB Min. Informational Anal. Bull. 2024, 4, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhanikulov, N.; Sapargaliyeva, B.; Agabekova, A.; Alfereva, Y.; Baidibekova, A.; Syrlybekkyzy, S.; Nurshakhanova, L.; Nurbayeva, F.; Sabyrbaeva, G.; Zhatkanbayev, Y. Studies of Utilization of Technogenic Raw Materials in the Synthesis of Cement Clinker from It and Further Production of Portland Cement. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Korchunov, I.; Dmitrieva, E.; Potapova, E.; Sivkov, S.; Morozov, A. Frost Resistance of The Hardened Cement with Calcined Clays. Iran. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 19, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Smolskaya, E.A.; Potapova, E.N.; Korshunov, I.V.; Sivkov, S.P. Properties of geopolymer cement based on thermally activated clay. Cem. Its Appl. 2024, 1, 50–54. Available online: https://jcement.ru/magazine/vypusk-1-2024/svoystva-geopolimernogo-tsementa-na-osnove-termoaktivirovannykh-glin/ (accessed on 23 May 2024).
  21. Potapova, E.N.; Manushina, A.S.; Zyryanov, M.S.; Urbanov, A.V. Methods for determining the pozzolanic activity of mineral additives. Build. Mater. Equip. Technol. XXI Century 2019, 11–12, 47–51, [Metodi opredeleniya puccolanovoi aktivnosti mineralnih dobavok]. Available online: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=gytmng (accessed on 11 December 2019).
  22. Mechay, A.A.; Baranovskaya, E.I.; Popova, M.V. Composite Portland cement with the use of mineral additives based on natural raw materials. Proc. BSTU 2022, 2, 100–106, [Kompozicionnii portlandcement s ispolzovaniem mineralnih dobavok na osnove prirodnogo sirya]. Available online: https://elib.belstu.by/bitstream/123456789/50310/1/13.%20%D0%9C%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B0%D0%B9.pdf (accessed on 2 November 2022).
  23. Yakubzhanova, N.D.; Makhsudova, M.I.; Iskandarova, A.I.; Buriev, G.B.; Begzhanova, D.D.; Mukhitdinov, Z.B. Technological foundations for solving the problem of metallurgy and TPP waste utilization for the development of “green” technology for the production of composite cements. In Proceedings of the 1V International Scientific Ash Conference Construction Mechanics & Water Resources Engineering CONMECHYDRO 2022. Dedicated to the 70th Anniversary of the Birth and Memory of Professor Uktam Pardaevich Umurzakov, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 23–24 August 2022; Scopus & Web of Science, Melville, AIP Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2023. Sub. 0191. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367538651_Technological_foundations_for_solving_problem_of_metallurgy_and_TPP_waste_utilization_for_development_of_Green_technology_for_composite_cements_production (accessed on 23 August 2022).
  24. GOST 25094-2015; Active Mineral Additives for Cements: Method for Determination of Activity. Standard Inform Publishing House: Moscow, Russia, 2016.
  25. GOST 5382-2019; Cements and Cement Production Materials: Methods of Chemical Analysis. Standard Inform Publishing House: Moscow, Russia, 2019.
  26. GOST 41-08-214-04; Industry Standard: Quality Management of Analytical Work. Standard Inform Publishing House: Moscow, Russia, 2004.
  27. GOST 310.1-81; Cements. Methods of Taking and Preparing Samples. IPK Publishing House of Standards: Moscow, Russia, 1981.
  28. GOST 310.3-81; Cements. Determination of Specific Surface by Air Permeability Method. IPK Publishing House of Standards: Moscow, Russia, 1981.
  29. GOST 310.4-81; Cements. Methods of Bending and Compression Strength Determination. IPK Publishing House of Standards: Moscow, Russia, 2016.
  30. GOST 12730.1-2020; Concretes. Methods of Density Determination. Standard Inform Publishing House: Moscow, Russia, 2021.
  31. GOST 12730.3-2020; Concretes. Method for Determining Water Absorption. Standard Inform Publishing House: Moscow, Russia, 2021.
  32. GOST 31108-2020; General Construction Cements Technical Specifications. Standard Inform Publishing House: Moscow, Russia, 2020.
Figure 1. CO2 emission quotas for cement plants in Kazakhstan until 2025.
Figure 1. CO2 emission quotas for cement plants in Kazakhstan until 2025.
Jcs 09 00269 g001
Figure 2. Chemical composition, structure, and local X-ray spectral analysis of Portland cement CEM I 42.5N.
Figure 2. Chemical composition, structure, and local X-ray spectral analysis of Portland cement CEM I 42.5N.
Jcs 09 00269 g002
Figure 3. Chemical composition, structure, and local X-ray spectral analysis of clay shale from Mynaral.
Figure 3. Chemical composition, structure, and local X-ray spectral analysis of clay shale from Mynaral.
Jcs 09 00269 g003
Figure 4. Chemical composition, structure, and local X-ray spectral analysis of clay shale from Kuyuk.
Figure 4. Chemical composition, structure, and local X-ray spectral analysis of clay shale from Kuyuk.
Jcs 09 00269 g004
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction patterns of the materials used: (a) CEM I 42.5N; (b) Mynaral clay shale; and (c) Kuyuk clay shale.
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction patterns of the materials used: (a) CEM I 42.5N; (b) Mynaral clay shale; and (c) Kuyuk clay shale.
Jcs 09 00269 g005
Figure 6. Diffraction pattern of clay shale from Kuyuk.
Figure 6. Diffraction pattern of clay shale from Kuyuk.
Jcs 09 00269 g006
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction patterns of the burnt clay shales of Mynaral at a temperature of 900 °C made at TselSIM (a) and RCTU (b).
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction patterns of the burnt clay shales of Mynaral at a temperature of 900 °C made at TselSIM (a) and RCTU (b).
Jcs 09 00269 g007aJcs 09 00269 g007b
Figure 8. X-ray diffraction pattern of clay shale from Kuyuk fired at 900 °C.
Figure 8. X-ray diffraction pattern of clay shale from Kuyuk fired at 900 °C.
Jcs 09 00269 g008
Figure 9. Effect of firing temperature of Mynaral clay shale on lime absorption.
Figure 9. Effect of firing temperature of Mynaral clay shale on lime absorption.
Jcs 09 00269 g009
Figure 10. Effect of firing temperature of Kuyuk clay shale on lime absorption.
Figure 10. Effect of firing temperature of Kuyuk clay shale on lime absorption.
Jcs 09 00269 g010
Figure 11. Results of physical and mechanical tests of cements without additives and with additives of Mynaral clay shale fired at 700–900 °C.
Figure 11. Results of physical and mechanical tests of cements without additives and with additives of Mynaral clay shale fired at 700–900 °C.
Jcs 09 00269 g011
Figure 12. Results of physical and mechanical tests of cements without additives and with additives of Kuyuk clay shale fired at 700–900 °C.
Figure 12. Results of physical and mechanical tests of cements without additives and with additives of Kuyuk clay shale fired at 700–900 °C.
Jcs 09 00269 g012
Figure 13. X-ray diffraction patterns of cement stone aged 28 days, without additives and with 10–15% Mynaral clay shale, fired at 700–900 °C. (1)—Cement stone without additives, (2)—cement stone with the addition of 10% clay shale fired at 700 °C, (3)—cement stone with the addition of 10% shale fired at 800 °C, (4)—cement stone with the addition of 15% shale fired at 900 °C.
Figure 13. X-ray diffraction patterns of cement stone aged 28 days, without additives and with 10–15% Mynaral clay shale, fired at 700–900 °C. (1)—Cement stone without additives, (2)—cement stone with the addition of 10% clay shale fired at 700 °C, (3)—cement stone with the addition of 10% shale fired at 800 °C, (4)—cement stone with the addition of 15% shale fired at 900 °C.
Jcs 09 00269 g013
Figure 14. SEM analysis of hydrated cement stone without additives. Hardening occurred over 28 days.
Figure 14. SEM analysis of hydrated cement stone without additives. Hardening occurred over 28 days.
Jcs 09 00269 g014
Figure 15. SEM analysis of hydrated cement stone with the addition of 15% Mynaral shale fired at 900 °C. Hardening occurred over 28 days.
Figure 15. SEM analysis of hydrated cement stone with the addition of 15% Mynaral shale fired at 900 °C. Hardening occurred over 28 days.
Jcs 09 00269 g015
Figure 16. Microphotographs of cement stone without additives over 28 days of hardening Magnification: (a) ×250; (b) ×500; and (c) ×1000.
Figure 16. Microphotographs of cement stone without additives over 28 days of hardening Magnification: (a) ×250; (b) ×500; and (c) ×1000.
Jcs 09 00269 g016aJcs 09 00269 g016b
Figure 17. Micrographs of cement stone with the addition of 15% Mynaral clay shale fired at 900 °C, hydrated over 28 days. Magnification: (a) ×250; (b) ×500; and (c) ×1000.
Figure 17. Micrographs of cement stone with the addition of 15% Mynaral clay shale fired at 900 °C, hydrated over 28 days. Magnification: (a) ×250; (b) ×500; and (c) ×1000.
Jcs 09 00269 g017aJcs 09 00269 g017b
Table 1. Average chemical compositions of the materials used.
Table 1. Average chemical compositions of the materials used.
NameChemical Composition %
SiO2Al2O3CaOFe2O3(FeO)Na2OK2OMgO
CEM I 42.5N18.553.2855.083.050.421.271.51
Clay shale from Mynaral70.4110.385.3810.641.60.750.75
Clay shale from
Kuyuk
53.8616.666.5312.941.642.554.16
Table 2. Results of physical and mechanical tests of cements with the addition of Mynaral clay shale, fired at 700–900 °C.
Table 2. Results of physical and mechanical tests of cements with the addition of Mynaral clay shale, fired at 700–900 °C.
Shale Additives, %Water–Cement RatioSetting Time, h-minCompressive Strength, MPaAverage Density,
g/cm3
StartEnd3 Days 7 Days28 Days
027.02-404-103235482250
700 °C
527.02-504-203336482245
1027.02-554-303338492250
1527.03-104-453336502265
2028.03-355-053235442240
2528.03-505-253134392210
800 °C
527.02-404-153337492260
1027.02-504-303340502270
1528.03-104-503438502275
2028.03-305-153234442250
2529.03-405-302930402235
900 °C
527.02-504-253338492260
1027.02-554-503339502275
1528.03-154-553436512290
2028.03-405-203235402245
2529.04-055-353133252230
Table 3. The results of physical and mechanical tests of cements without additives and with the addition of 5–15% Kuyuk clay shale, fired at 700–900 °C.
Table 3. The results of physical and mechanical tests of cements without additives and with the addition of 5–15% Kuyuk clay shale, fired at 700–900 °C.
Shale Additives, %Water–Cement RatioSetting Time, h-minCompressive Strength, MPaAverage Density,
g/cm3
StartEnd3 Days7 Days28 Days
027.02-404-103235482250
700 °C
527.02-554-253134452235
1027.03-054-453033462242
1527.03-154-553032472145
2028.03-255-052931432225
2528.03–355-252729392205
800 °C
527.02-504-203234462240
1027.03-004-403134472245
1528.03-104-503033482160
2028.03-205-002830442220
2529.03-305-202627402190
900 °C
527.02-554-253234472240
1027.03-054-453234482245
1528.03-104-503134492250
2029.03-205-052931452225
2529.03-355-252628412205
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amiraliyev, B.; Taimasov, B.; Potapova, E.; Sarsenbaev, B.; Begentayev, M.; Dauletiyarov, M.; Kuandykova, A.; Abdullin, A.; Ainabekov, N.; Auyesbek, S. Heat Treatment of Clay Shales and Their Utilization as Active Mineral Additives for the Production of Composite Cements. J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9, 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9060269

AMA Style

Amiraliyev B, Taimasov B, Potapova E, Sarsenbaev B, Begentayev M, Dauletiyarov M, Kuandykova A, Abdullin A, Ainabekov N, Auyesbek S. Heat Treatment of Clay Shales and Their Utilization as Active Mineral Additives for the Production of Composite Cements. Journal of Composites Science. 2025; 9(6):269. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9060269

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amiraliyev, Baurzhan, Bakhitzhan Taimasov, Ekaterina Potapova, Bakhitzhan Sarsenbaev, Meiram Begentayev, Mukhtar Dauletiyarov, Aknur Kuandykova, Aidana Abdullin, Nurzhan Ainabekov, and Sultan Auyesbek. 2025. "Heat Treatment of Clay Shales and Their Utilization as Active Mineral Additives for the Production of Composite Cements" Journal of Composites Science 9, no. 6: 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9060269

APA Style

Amiraliyev, B., Taimasov, B., Potapova, E., Sarsenbaev, B., Begentayev, M., Dauletiyarov, M., Kuandykova, A., Abdullin, A., Ainabekov, N., & Auyesbek, S. (2025). Heat Treatment of Clay Shales and Their Utilization as Active Mineral Additives for the Production of Composite Cements. Journal of Composites Science, 9(6), 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9060269

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop