Previous Article in Journal
Nonlinear Aero-Thermo-Elastic Analysis of Laminated Composite Beams with Surface-Bonded FGMs Layers Subjected to a Concentrated Harmonic Load
Previous Article in Special Issue
Corrosion-Resistant Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation Composite Coatings on Ti6Al4V for Harsh Acidic Environments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multimetallic Layered Double Hydroxides as OER Catalysts for High-Performance Water Electrolysis

by
Yiqin Zhan
1,2,
Linsong Wang
1,2,
Tao Yang
2,3,*,
Shuang Liu
2,
Liming Yang
2,
Enhui Wang
2,3,
Xiangtao Yu
2,
Hongyang Wang
1,*,
Kuo-Chih Chou
2 and
Xinmei Hou
2,3,4,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
2
Institute for Carbon Neutrality, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
3
Institute of Steel Sustainable Technology, Liaoning Academy of Materials, Shenyang 110000, China
4
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Materials Genome Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9(10), 540; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9100540
Submission received: 12 June 2025 / Revised: 9 September 2025 / Accepted: 25 September 2025 / Published: 2 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal Composites, Volume II)

Abstract

Water electrolysis represents a viable and scalable green hydrogen production technology, which mitigates carbon emissions and contributes to environmental sustainability. Transition metal-based layered double hydroxides (LDHs) exhibit excellent oxygen evolution reaction (OER) efficiency, attributed to their adjustable interlayer spacing combined with abundant active sites. Here, we report a uniform multimetallic catalyst, demonstrating robust and efficient OER performance for high-performance water splitting. SEM and TEM confirmed its ultrathin hierarchical nanosheet structure. The characteristic peaks of LDH in XRD and Raman spectra further verified the successful synthesis of the LDH material. Fe-CoZn LDH delivers exceptional OER performance in 1 M KOH, requiring overpotentials of just 209, 238, and 267 mV to reach 10, 100, and 400 mA cm−2, respectively. The catalyst also demonstrates exceptional hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) performance, achieving 10 mA cm−2 at 119 mV. It also has excellent stability, with stable operation for up to 100 h under 100 mA cm−2 in 1 M KOH electrolyte solution.

1. Introduction

Against the backdrop of global energy transition, advancing clean energy technologies has become an urgent scientific imperative, driven by both the non-renewable nature and depletion of fossil fuel reserves, as well as their associated climate change and pollution challenges. Advancing clean and efficient energy technologies is critical to addressing energy crises and achieving low-carbon development. Recently, hydrogen production from electrolytic water has attracted a lot of attention as an economical, clean, efficient and long-lasting method of energy production [1,2,3]. It is crucial for researchers to design innovative and unique materials for efficient OER and to optimise the reaction process [4]. Transition metal-based LDHs have been extensively investigated as highly efficient electrocatalysts for the OER [5,6,7]. Due to their exceptional electrocatalytic properties, transition metal-containing LDHs represent a top-tier choice for scalable and affordable OER applications [8].
LDHs exhibit unique structural tunability, including the adjustable composition and ratio of metal cations in the layers, as well as replaceable intercalated anions, controllable crystal size and morphology, and tunable interlayer spacing. The large surface area provides numerous catalytic sites, significantly enhancing catalytic efficiency. Moreover, since most LDHs in OER catalysts are Fe-, Co-, and Ni-based transition metals, which are abundant and widely available, they offer significant cost advantages. Thus, LDHs exhibit outstanding performance and promising potential in catalytic applications [9,10,11,12]. Owing to the distinctive structure of LDHs, their OER performance can be modulated via metal cation incorporation, and interlayer ion exchange [13,14]. The strategic introduction of cationic dopants into transition metal LDHs significantly boosts their electrocatalytic performance. Beyond creating new active sites, these dopants tailor the host’s electronic properties, leading to optimized binding strengths for OER intermediates [15]. Incorporating metal ions with varying electronegativities represents an effective strategy to activate Ni/Fe-LDHs and boost their OER activity. Recent studies demonstrate that improving electrical conductivity to promote charge transfer and tailoring nanostructures to maximize active site exposure represent effective strategies for enhancing OER kinetics [16,17,18]. Similar catalysts, as exemplified by W-doped NiFe LDH [19] or Fe-doped CoNi LDH [20], have been reported, indicating that transition metal incorporation promotes charge transfer kinetics, consequently improving OER activity.
In the present work, a homogeneous multimetallic NiFe-CoZn LDH catalyst was synthesized by transforming CoZn-based metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), which demonstrates outstanding OER catalytic performance in alkaline electrolytes. The bimetallic co-doped LDH was obtained via an etching and co-deposition strategy, reconstructing the original MOF’s large sheet-like array into ultrathin hierarchical LDH nanosheet arrays. This tailored microstructure promotes extensive exposure of active sites while enabling efficient mass transfer via optimized electrolyte diffusion. The phase composition and electronic structure of the synthesized catalysts were characterized by XRD, Raman spectroscopy, and XPS. Their electrocatalytic performance for the OER, HER, and overall water splitting was systematically evaluated, along with an assessment of their long-term stability.

2. Material Synthesis

Initially, NF pieces (2 × 4 cm2) were immersed in 3 M HCl during sonication lasting 8 min, after which they were rinsed using ethanol followed by deionized water (12 min). Two precursor solutions were then prepared: one comprising 32 mL of 0.04 M Co(NO3)2·6H2O and 0.01 M Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, and the second solution prepared with 32 mL of 0.4 M 2-methylimidazole (C4H6N2). These solutions were rapidly combined, and the pre-treated NF was immediately soaked in the resulting mixture. After incubation at 25 °C for 4 h, the NF was retrieved, rinsed using DI water, then dried under vacuum at 60 °C for a duration of 12 h. In the subsequent step, the CoZn MOF-coated NF (1 cm × 2 cm) was immersed in a mixed solution of 4 mL containing 0.21 M Ni(NO3)2·6H2O and 0.09 M FeSO4·7H2O for 1 h. The product was then washed using DI water and air-dried.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural and Morphological Characterisation

Firstly, nickel foam-supported CoZn-MOF nanosheet arrays were fabricated through a solution-based approach, exhibiting vertical alignment [21]. CoZn MOFs were grown on NF with high density and uniformity, as confirmed by the nanosheet array morphology in (Figure 1a), and the magnified SEM micrograph demonstrates the smooth surface of MOF nanosheets, with a thickness of about 150 nm. After immersion in a Ni2+ and Fe3+ solution at room temperature, numerous ultrathin nanosheets with lengths of approximately 8 μm and thicknesses around 150 nanometers were directly constructed on the surface of CoZn MOF nanosheets, resulting in a hierarchical nanosheet architecture (Figure 1b,c). Protons generated from Ni2+/Fe2+ hydrolysis etched the CoZn MOF, releasing Co2+ and Zn2+ ions during this process. These liberated ions co-precipitated with Ni2+ and Fe2+ to form NiFe LDH and CoZn LDH, which subsequently integrated with the remaining organic framework of the MOF, resulting in the hierarchical nanosheet structure [22,23]. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization (Figure 1d) provides definitive evidence of the hierarchical nanosheet architecture, revealing the uniform vertical alignment of LDH nanosheets on MOF microsheet substrates. High-resolution diffraction rings belonging to the CoZn LDH (−332) plane and NiFe LDH (012) plane are shown by selective area electron diffraction (SAED) in (Figure 1e). HRTEM analysis showed clear lattice fringes corresponding to d-spacings of 0.152 nm (CoZn LDH, (−332) plane) and 0.259 nm (NiFe LDH, (012) plane), as seen in (Figure 1f) [24]. Elemental mapping further confirmed the homogeneous distribution of all constituent elements (Figure 1g).
To identify the precise crystalline phases of the catalysts, we performed XRD on various samples. The XRD diffractograms of the CoZn MOF presented in (Figure 2a) demonstrate display characteristic diffraction peaks in the range of 5 to 45 degrees, which can be attributed to the zeolitic imidazolate framework structure (ZIF-67), along with two prominent peaks originating from the underlying Ni substrate [25]. The XRD pattern exhibited two characteristic peaks at 11.5° and 39.3°, corresponding to the (003) and (012) planes of the nickel hydroxide phase (JCPDS No. 38-0715). As evidenced by the Raman spectra (Figure 2b), the LDH material is successfully generated, as representative stretching modes belonging to LDH were detected for this sample at 456, 533, and 1050 cm−1 [26]. Then we employed XPS analysis to probe the chemical state and electronic structure of the catalyst. In the Ni 2p region (Figure 2c), the peaks located at 856.12 eV and 873.71 eV are assigned to Ni3+ 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 states, respectively. The binding energy at 854.77 eV is attributed to Ni2+ 2p3/2 in Ni-O, which has oscillating satellite features at 862.63 and 880.34 eV (denoted by “Sat”). Consequently, Ni exists in a composite chemical state of Ni3+ and Ni2+ [27]. The XPS analysis of NiFe-CoZn LDH reveals distinct oxidation states for each metal: Fe3+ is identified by its characteristic Fe 2p3/2 (713.33 eV) and Fe 2p1/2 (727.13 eV) peaks with satellite features at 862.07 and 879.94 eV (Figure 2d), while Co 2p spectra show mixed Co2+/Co3+ states through primary peaks at 782.28 eV (Co 2p3/2) and 797.67 eV (Co 2p1/2) and satellite peaks at 786.61 and 804.2 eV (Figure 2e). Additionally, Zn 2p peaks at 1021.97 eV (Zn 2p3/2) and 1044.94 eV (Zn 2p1/2) confirm the presence of Zn-O species (Figure 2f) [28,29].

3.2. Electrochemical Properties of Alkaline Electrolyte Solutions

The OER and HER catalytic activity of NiFe-CoZn LDH was evaluated in 1.0 M KOH using LSV. As demonstrated in (Figure 3a,b), the catalyst delivers outstanding performance, achieving remarkably low overpotentials of 209, 238, and 267 mV at 10, 100, and 400 mA cm−2, respectively, all of which are significantly lower than those of the CoZn MOF counterpart (302 mV, 379 mV, and 425 mV, respectively). The overpotential at 100 mA−2 compares favourably with recently reported layered hydroxide catalysts, and NiFe-CoZn LDH outperforms the majority of reported bifunctional electrocatalysts in terms of electrochemical activity (Figure 3e) [30,31,32]. The NiFe-CoZn LDH displays a reduced Tafel slope (36.8 mV dec−1) relative to CoZn MOFs (77.2 mV dec−1), indicating enhanced reaction kinetics (Figure 3c). EIS measurements show that the Rct value of NiFe-CoZn LDH is very small at 0.43 Ω, much lower than that of CoZn MOFs at 8.8 Ω. It is well established that Tafel slopes and charge transfer resistance (Rct) are closely associated with electron and mass transport, and catalytic kinetics. The enhanced OER kinetics observed here can be attributed to the layered nanosheet architecture and the self-supported nature of the NiFe-CoZn LDH arrays, which collectively help to minimize contact resistance (Figure 3d). Owing to their favorable electrical conductivity, the hierarchical ultrathin nanosheets function as effective charge transport channels, which significantly enhances electron transfer rates [33,34].
The NiFe-CoZn LDH exhibited exceptional OER stability under 100 mA cm−2, demonstrating only a 32 mV overpotential increase after 100 h of continuous testing (Figure 4a). The remarkable stability can be attributed to the structural stability of the LDH introduced by etching, and the morphology of the samples remained essentially unchanged after the stability tests, still maintaining the hierarchical nanostructure, and can be confirmed in the post-test SEM images (Figure 4b).
NiFe-CoZn LDH showed outstanding catalytic performance, achieving overpotentials of 119, 251, and 285 mV at 10, 50, and 100 mA cm−2, respectively (Figure 5a), significantly lower than those of CoZn MOFs (198, 282, and 332 mV at corresponding current densities (Figure 5b)). To assess the HER kinetics, we performed a corresponding linear fit to the Tafel plot (Figure 5c). NiFe-CoZn LDH displays a lower Tafel slope (105.6 mV dec−1) than CoZn MOFs (162.5 mV dec−1), indicating more favorable HER kinetics and a faster reaction rate. EIS characterizations were performed to investigate the charge transfer characteristics. As shown in the Nyquist plots (Figure 5d), all catalysts display clear semicircular arcs, representing interfacial charge transfer resistance (Rct). The Rct value for NiFe-CoZn LDH is notably low at 8.2 Ω, compared to 18.6 Ω for CoZn MOFs. This reduced resistance suggests enhanced electron transfer efficiency and improved catalytic kinetics, consistent with the Tafel slope analysis, which corroborates the superior charge transport capability and catalytic activity [35].
An alkaline water electrolyzer with NiFe-CoZn LDH catalyst in 1 M KOH was assembled and tested for overall water splitting. As evident from the chronopotentiometric data (Figure 6a), the cell demonstrated exceptional operational stability over 50 h, exhibiting minimal voltage fluctuation with only 3.9% performance decay. Post-stability LSV analysis confirms the electrode’s stable performance, sustaining 100 mA cm−2 at 1.64 V with negligible degradation (Figure 6b).

3.3. Investigation of Electrocatalytic Performance and Stability

To evaluate the catalytic enhancement of NiFe-CoZn LDH, CV was conducted at scan rates ranging from 20 to 100 mV s−1 (Figure 7a,b), enabling the determination of Cdl and ECSA. The current density variations were correlated with scan rate and analyzed via linear regression (Figure 7c,d). NiFe-CoZn LDH exhibited a significantly higher double-layer capacitance (2.90 mF cm−2) compared to CoZn MOFs (0.55 mF cm−2), confirming its larger ECSA thereby consequently more exposed OER-active sites.

3.4. Advantages over Conventional Electrodes

Compared to conventional precious metal catalysts (e.g., Pt/C, IrO2), our Ni/Fe-CoZn LDH significantly reduces material costs by utilizing earth-abundant transition metals, while maintaining competitive bifunctional activity (OER: 209 mV; HER: 119 mV @ 10 mA cm−2). Unlike traditional systems that require physically separated HER and OER catalysts, our single-phase design eliminates interfacial incompatibility issues while maintaining performance comparable to benchmark Pt/C-IrO2 couples in a simplified two-electrode configuration. This synergy of cost-effectiveness and integrated functionality addresses critical bottlenecks in scalable water electrolysis. Notably, our catalyst exhibits a lower overpotential and Tafel slope than most LDH-based benchmarks (Table 1), demonstrating superior kinetics. Moreover, our catalyst demonstrates excellent reproducibility and scalability. Three catalysts were synthesized under identical preparation conditions and their OER performance was evaluated. As shown in (Figures S1–S3), the LSV curves of the three samples exhibit nearly identical OER activity, with an overpotential of 208 (±2) mV at 10 mA cm−2. A large-area catalyst was also fabricated using this method (Figure S4). A 1 cm2 sample demonstrated an OER overpotential of 210 mV at 10 mA cm−2 (Figure S5), confirming the catalyst’s excellent reproducibility and scalability.

4. Conclusions

This study demonstrates that ultrathin Ni/Fe-CoZn LDH nanosheets serve as an exceptional bifunctional electrocatalyst exhibiting both superior activity and stability toward overall water splitting, achieving exceptional performance with 209 mV (OER) and 119 mV (HER) at 10 mA cm−2, surpassing most reported noble-metal-free catalysts to date. The improved catalytic performance arises from the cooperative interaction of Ni/Fe co-doping, which optimizes electronic structure for favorable reaction intermediate adsorption, and the hierarchical ultrathin nanosheet morphology, facilitating maximal exposure of active sites while enabling efficient charge transfer and mass transport. Remarkably, the catalyst demonstrates exceptional stability, sustaining 100 h of continuous electrolysis at 100 mA cm−2 with minimal degradation. In a two-electrode system, the electrolyzer delivers an ultralow cell voltage of 1.64 V at 100 mA cm−2, highlighting its potential for industrial-scale hydrogen production. This work advances the design of cost-effective, high-performance water-splitting catalysts and provides critical insights into achieving both high activity and stability under practical operating conditions. Despite the promising performance, further efforts are needed to advance the practical application of Ni/Fe-CoZn LDH.
(1)
Long-term stability tests under industrial operating conditions (current density > 500 mA cm−2) are necessary to assess practical viability.
(2)
The as-prepared catalyst will be integrated into an anion exchange membrane water electrolyzer (AEMWE) for industrial-scale overall water splitting tests under high current densities.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcs9100540/s1, Figure S1: The LSV curve of NiFe-CoZn LDH-1; Figure S2:The LSV curve of NiFe-CoZn LDH-2; Figure S3: The LSV curve of NiFe-CoZn LDH-3; Figure S4: Photograph of the successfully synthesized large-area catalyst (25 cm2); Figure S5: The LSV curve of the scaled-up NiFe-CoZn LDH catalyst (1 cm2).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L.; Formal analysis, L.W., L.Y. and K.-C.C.; Data curation, Y.Z.; Writing – original draft, Y.Z., L.W., X.Y., K.-C.C. and X.H.; Writing – review & editing, Y.Z., L.W., T.Y., S.L., E.W., X.Y., H.W. and X.H.; Supervision, S.L. and X.Y.; Project administration, T.Y.; Funding acquisition, T.Y., H.W. and X.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (NO. 52025041), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 52450003, 52474319, 52250091, U2341267, 52370053), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of NO. FRF-TP-20-02C2. This project is supported by the Interdisciplinary Research Project for Young Teachers of USTB (Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities) (NO. FRF-IDRY-GD23-003).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Acknowledgments

Yiqin Zhan, Linsong Wang and Tao Yang contributed equally to this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, C.-H.; Yuan, C.-Z.; Huang, X.; Zhao, H.; Wu, F.; Xin, L.; Zhang, X.; Ye, S.; Chen, Y. Tailoring the electron redistribution of RuO2 by constructing a Ru-O-La asymmetric configuration for efficient acidic oxygen evolution. eScience 2025, 5, 100307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guo, B.-R.; Chen, M.-X.; Li, S.-W.; Gao, R.-H.; Sang, B.-H.; Ren, X.-Q.; Liu, Z.; Cao, X.; Liu, J.; Ding, Y.-N.; et al. Construction of iron oxyhydroxide/nickel sulfate hydroxide hybrid electrocatalyst for efficient oxygen evolution. Rare Metals 2024, 43, 6394–6404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, L.; Cao, Y.; Wang, L.; Yang, T.; Wang, K.; Wang, E.; Yu, X.; Wang, H.; Chou, K.-C.; Hou, X. Synthesis of various morphologies of CoFe bimetallic hydroxides for enhanced OER performance. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2025, 32, 2024–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, S.L.; Guan, B.Y.; Lu, X.F.; Xi, S.; Du, Y.; Lou, X.W.D. Metal Atom-Doped Co3O4 Hierarchical Nanoplates for Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e2002235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Han, C.; Zhao, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Guo, Z.; Chen, G.; Yang, J.; Bao, Q.; Guo, L.; Chen, C. Transition metal-based layered double hydroxides and their derivatives for efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 63, 918–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, Y.; Qiao, M.; Li, Y.; Wang, S. Tuning Surface Electronic Configuration of NiFe LDHs Nanosheets by Introducing Cation Vacancies (Fe or Ni) as Highly Efficient Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Small 2018, 14, e1800136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shi, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, B.; Lv, S.; Wang, T.; Liu, X. Tuning electronic structure of CoNi LDHs via surface Fe doping for achieving effective oxygen evolution reaction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 565, 150506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, L.; Yu, L.; Xiao, X.; Zhang, F.; Song, S.; Chen, S.; Ren, Z. Recent Advances in Self-Supported Layered Double Hydroxides for Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Research 2020, 2020, 3976278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, P.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, B.; Meng, F.; Wang, Y.; Wen, G. Recent advance of layered double hydroxides materials: Structure, properties, synthesis, modification and applications of wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 111191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Deka, S.; Jaiswal, M.K.; Rajput, P.; Choudhury, B. Mechanistic insights into electrocatalytically reduced OER performance in marigold-like trimetallic NiFe-based LDH: Charge localisation and d-band orbital filling. J. Mater. Chem. A 2024, 12, 9532–9545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kulkarni, R.; Lingamdinne, L.P.; Karri, R.R.; Momin, Z.H.; Koduru, J.R.; Chang, Y.-Y. Catalytic efficiency of LDH@carbonaceous hybrid nanocomposites towards water splitting mechanism: Impact of plasma and its significance on HER and OER activity. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 497, 215460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, J.; Le, T.A.; Tran, N.Q.; Lee, H. Earth-Abundant Transition-Metal-Based Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting in Alkaline Media. Chemistry 2020, 26, 6423–6436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ahn, I.K.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, H.G.; Lee, G.B.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, M.; Joo, Y.C. Electrochemical oxidation of boron-doped nickel-iron layered double hydroxide for facile charge transfer in oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 8198–8206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wen, Q.; Yang, K.; Huang, D.; Cheng, G.; Ai, X.; Liu, Y.; Fang, J.; Li, H.; Yu, L.; Zhai, T. Schottky Heterojunction Nanosheet Array Achieving High-Current-Density Oxygen Evolution for Industrial Water Splitting Electrolyzers. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2102353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, D.; Li, Q.; Han, C.; Lu, Q.; Xing, Z.; Yang, X. Atomic and electronic modulation of self-supported nickel-vanadium layered double hydroxide to accelerate water splitting kinetics. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.; Jing, L.; Jiang, W.; Wu, Y.; Liu, B.; Sun, Y.; Chu, X.; Liu, C. Rich oxygen vacancy and amorphous/crystalline ruthenium-doped CoCu -layered double hydroxide electrocatalysts for enhanced oxygen evolution reactions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 671, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Z.; Wang, D.; Xu, J.; Sun, H.; Shi, Z. Constructing surface concave defects on NiFe layered double hydroxides by electrochemical reduction for efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 482, 148858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cao, W.; Wu, J.; Zhou, C.; Gao, X.; Hu, E.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Z. Reinforcement of Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Activity Enabled by Constructing Silver-Incorporated NiCo-PBA@NiFe-LDH Hierarchical Nanoboxes. Small 2024, 20, e2309769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, L.; Yu, L.; Zhang, F.; Wang, D.; Luo, D.; Song, S.; Yuan, C.; Karim, A.; Chen, S.; Ren, Z. Facile synthesis of nanoparticle-stacked tungsten-doped nickel iron layered double hydroxide nanosheets for boosting oxygen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 8096–8103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, X.; Yan, F.; Ma, X.; Zhu, C.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Chou, S.L.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Y. Regulation of Morphology and Electronic Structure of FeCoNi Layered Double Hydroxides for Highly Active and Stable Water Oxidization Catalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2102141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Hu, J.; Li, S.; Du, Y.; Han, X.; Xu, P. Metal–Organic Frameworks Derived Interconnected Bimetallic Metaphosphate Nanoarrays for Efficient Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1910498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cheng, N.; Ren, L.; Xu, X.; Du, Y.; Dou, S.X. Recent Development of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks (ZIFs) Derived Porous Carbon Based Materials as Electrocatalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cheng, W.; Wu, Z.P.; Luan, D.; Zang, S.Q.; Lou, X.W.D. Synergetic Cobalt-Copper-Based Bimetal-Organic Framework Nanoboxes toward Efficient Electrochemical Oxygen Evolution. Angew. Chem. 2021, 60, 26397–26402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yu, L.; Xiao, J.; Huang, C.; Zhou, J.; Qiu, M.; Yu, Y.; Ren, Z.; Chu, C.W.; Yu, J.C. High-performance seawater oxidation by a homogeneous multimetallic layered double hydroxide electrocatalyst. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2202382119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wu, J.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Niu, S.; Zhao, J.; Li, S.; Xu, P. Understanding the Effect of Second Metal on CoM (M = Ni, Cu, Zn) Metal-Organic Frameworks for Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Small 2021, 17, e2105150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ning, M.; Wu, L.; Zhang, F.; Wang, D.; Song, S.; Tong, T.; Bao, J.; Chen, S.; Yu, L.; Ren, Z. One-step spontaneous growth of NiFe layered double hydroxide at room temperature for seawater oxygen evolution. Mater. Today Phys. 2021, 19, 100419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, S.; Xi, C.; Jin, Y.-Z.; Wu, D.; Wang, J.-Q.; Liu, T.; Wang, H.-B.; Dong, C.-K.; Liu, H.; Kulinich, S.A.; et al. Ir–O–V Catalytic Group in Ir-Doped NiV(OH)2 for Overall Water Splitting. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 1823–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Niu, S.; Jiang, W.J.; Tang, T.; Yuan, L.P.; Luo, H.; Hu, J.S. Autogenous Growth of Hierarchical NiFe(OH)x/FeS Nanosheet-On-Microsheet Arrays for Synergistically Enhanced High-Output Water Oxidation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1902180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, L.; Yang, L.; Yang, T.; Wang, K.; Wang, H.; Wang, E.; Chou, K.-C.; Hou, X. Ultra-stable electrocatalysts for overall urea degradation by NiFeCoZn–S modified N-doped carbon. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 44440–44446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, Y.; Liu, W.; Jiang, K.; Xu, L.; Guan, M.; Bao, J.; Ji, H.; Li, H. Constructing a CeO2−x@CoFe-layered double hydroxide heterostructure as an improved electrocatalyst for highly efficient water oxidation. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 4461–4468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, P.; Duan, X.; Kuang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, G.; Liu, W.; Sun, X. Tuning Electronic Structure of NiFe Layered Double Hydroxides with Vanadium Doping toward High Efficient Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1703341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, L.; Wu, L.; Song, S.; McElhenny, B.; Zhang, F.; Chen, S.; Ren, Z. Hydrogen Generation from Seawater Electrolysis over a Sandwich-like NiCoN|NixP|NiCoN Microsheet Array Catalyst. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 2681–2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, H.; Zhou, W.; Dong, J.; Lu, X.F.; Lou, X.W. Intramolecular electronic coupling in porous iron cobalt (oxy)phosphide nanoboxes enhances the electrocatalytic activity for oxygen evolution. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 3348–3355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zou, Z.; Wang, J.; Pan, H.; Li, J.; Guo, K.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, C. Enhanced oxygen evolution reaction of defective CoP/MOF-integrated electrocatalyst by partial phosphating. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 14099–14105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yan, L.; Cao, L.; Dai, P.; Gu, X.; Liu, D.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, X. Metal-Organic Frameworks Derived Nanotube of Nickel–Cobalt Bimetal Phosphides as Highly Efficient Electrocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1703455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, S.; Wan, R.; Lin, Z.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Qin, D.-D.; Tang, Z. Probing the Co role in promoting the OER and Zn–air battery performance of NiFe-LDH: A combined experimental and theoretical study. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 5244–5254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meng, L.; Xuan, H.; Wang, J.; Liang, X.; Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Han, P. Flower-like Co3O4@NiFe-LDH nanosheets enable high-performance bifunctionality towards both electrocatalytic HER and OER in alkaline solution. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 919, 165877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mo, J.; Chen, Y.; Guo, J.; Huang, H.; Chen, B.-M.; Xu, R.; Guo, Z. Microstructure and oxygen vacancy modulation realizing high OER performance in Co-NiFe LDH. Mater. Today Commun. 2025, 42, 111162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, M.; Liu, X.; Wu, X. Realizing efficient electrochemical overall water electrolysis through hierarchical CoP@NiCo-LDH nanohybrids. Nano Energy 2023, 114, 165877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, X.; Cheng, J.; Xu, Y.; Li, H.; Tu, W.; Zhou, J. Heterogeneous ultra-thin FeCo-LDH@Co(OH)2 nanosheets facilitated electrons transfer for oxygen evolution reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 472, 145076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dao, H.T.; Hoa, V.H.; Sidra, S.; Mai, M.; Zharnikov, M.; Kim, D.H. Dual efficiency enhancement in overall water splitting with defect-rich and Ru atom-doped NiFe LDH nanosheets on NiCo2O4 nanowires. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 485, 150054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sreenivasulu, M.; Hadrihalli, A.; Alshehri, M.A.; Shetti, N.P. Rational Designing of Nickel–Iron Containing Layered Double Hydroxide [NiFe@LDH] Electrocatalysts for Effective Water Splitting. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 12888–12899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tang, J.; Huang, J.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Z.; Xiao, J. Cr doping and heterostructure-accelerated NiFe LDH reaction kinetics assist the MoS2 oxygen evolution reaction. Nanoscale 2024, 16, 3650–3658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) SEM micrograph of CoZn MOFs. NiFe-CoZn LDH SEM micrographs at different magnifications, (b) low-magnified and (c) high-magnified; (d) TEM image of NiFe-CoZn LDH; (e) SAED micrograph of NiFe-CoZn LDH; (f) HRTEM micrograph of NiFe-CoZn LDH; (g) SEM micrograph and elementary maps of NiFe-CoZn LDH.
Figure 1. (a) SEM micrograph of CoZn MOFs. NiFe-CoZn LDH SEM micrographs at different magnifications, (b) low-magnified and (c) high-magnified; (d) TEM image of NiFe-CoZn LDH; (e) SAED micrograph of NiFe-CoZn LDH; (f) HRTEM micrograph of NiFe-CoZn LDH; (g) SEM micrograph and elementary maps of NiFe-CoZn LDH.
Jcs 09 00540 g001
Figure 2. (a) XRD diffractograms of different catalysts. (b) Raman spectra of NiFe-CoZn LDH. XPS plots, (c) Ni 2p, (d) Fe 2p, (e) Co 2p and (f) Zn 2p of NiFe-CoZn LDH.
Figure 2. (a) XRD diffractograms of different catalysts. (b) Raman spectra of NiFe-CoZn LDH. XPS plots, (c) Ni 2p, (d) Fe 2p, (e) Co 2p and (f) Zn 2p of NiFe-CoZn LDH.
Jcs 09 00540 g002
Figure 3. Electrocatalytic performance of the OER. (a) LSV curves comparing the electrochemical performance of CoZn MOFs and NiFe-CoZn LDH. (b) Overpotential values of the samples at different current densities. (c) Tafel plots and (d) EIS Nyquist plots of the samples. (e) Comparative overpotential analysis of NiFe-CoZn LDH versus recent bifunctional electrocatalysts (100 mA cm−2, alkaline electrolyte).
Figure 3. Electrocatalytic performance of the OER. (a) LSV curves comparing the electrochemical performance of CoZn MOFs and NiFe-CoZn LDH. (b) Overpotential values of the samples at different current densities. (c) Tafel plots and (d) EIS Nyquist plots of the samples. (e) Comparative overpotential analysis of NiFe-CoZn LDH versus recent bifunctional electrocatalysts (100 mA cm−2, alkaline electrolyte).
Jcs 09 00540 g003
Figure 4. (a) Stability assessment of NiFe-CoZn LDH under 100 mA cm−2. (b) SEM image after stability test.
Figure 4. (a) Stability assessment of NiFe-CoZn LDH under 100 mA cm−2. (b) SEM image after stability test.
Jcs 09 00540 g004
Figure 5. Electrocatalytic performance toward the HER. (a) LSV curves of the investigated samples. (b) Overpotential values of the samples at different current densities. (c) Tafel plots of NiFe-CoZn LDH. (d) Nyquist plots of NiFe-CoZn LDH. (e) Comparative overpotential analysis of NiFe-CoZn LDH versus recent bifunctional electrocatalysts (100 mA cm−2, alkaline electrolyte).
Figure 5. Electrocatalytic performance toward the HER. (a) LSV curves of the investigated samples. (b) Overpotential values of the samples at different current densities. (c) Tafel plots of NiFe-CoZn LDH. (d) Nyquist plots of NiFe-CoZn LDH. (e) Comparative overpotential analysis of NiFe-CoZn LDH versus recent bifunctional electrocatalysts (100 mA cm−2, alkaline electrolyte).
Jcs 09 00540 g005
Figure 6. (a) Chronopotentiometric stability test at 100 mA cm−2, (b) comparison of LSV curves before and after stability testing.
Figure 6. (a) Chronopotentiometric stability test at 100 mA cm−2, (b) comparison of LSV curves before and after stability testing.
Jcs 09 00540 g006
Figure 7. (a,b) CV curves and (c,d) linear fitting of Cdl vs. CV scan rate for the estimation of ECSA of CoZn MOFs and NiFe-CoZn LDH.
Figure 7. (a,b) CV curves and (c,d) linear fitting of Cdl vs. CV scan rate for the estimation of ECSA of CoZn MOFs and NiFe-CoZn LDH.
Jcs 09 00540 g007
Table 1. Comparison of the catalytic performance between the as-prepared catalyst and previously reported LDH-based catalysts.
Table 1. Comparison of the catalytic performance between the as-prepared catalyst and previously reported LDH-based catalysts.
ElectrocatalystTafel SlopeOverpotential at 10 mA cm−2References
Co@NiFe-LDH44 mV dec−1253 mV[36]
Co3O4@NiFe-LDH/NF40.4 mV dec−1215 mV[37]
Co-NiFe LDH38.4 mV dec−1254 mV[38]
CoP@NiCo-LDH46.6 mV dec−1225 mV[39]
FeCo-LDH@Co(OH)275.8 mV dec−1230 mV[40]
def-Ru-NiFe LDH/NCO52 mV dec−1225 mV[41]
NiFe@LDH76 mV dec−1260 mV[42]
MoS2/NiFeCr LDH61 mV dec−1224 mV[43]
This work36.8 mV dec−1209 mV
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhan, Y.; Wang, L.; Yang, T.; Liu, S.; Yang, L.; Wang, E.; Yu, X.; Wang, H.; Chou, K.-C.; Hou, X. Multimetallic Layered Double Hydroxides as OER Catalysts for High-Performance Water Electrolysis. J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9, 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9100540

AMA Style

Zhan Y, Wang L, Yang T, Liu S, Yang L, Wang E, Yu X, Wang H, Chou K-C, Hou X. Multimetallic Layered Double Hydroxides as OER Catalysts for High-Performance Water Electrolysis. Journal of Composites Science. 2025; 9(10):540. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9100540

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhan, Yiqin, Linsong Wang, Tao Yang, Shuang Liu, Liming Yang, Enhui Wang, Xiangtao Yu, Hongyang Wang, Kuo-Chih Chou, and Xinmei Hou. 2025. "Multimetallic Layered Double Hydroxides as OER Catalysts for High-Performance Water Electrolysis" Journal of Composites Science 9, no. 10: 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9100540

APA Style

Zhan, Y., Wang, L., Yang, T., Liu, S., Yang, L., Wang, E., Yu, X., Wang, H., Chou, K.-C., & Hou, X. (2025). Multimetallic Layered Double Hydroxides as OER Catalysts for High-Performance Water Electrolysis. Journal of Composites Science, 9(10), 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9100540

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop