Abstract
The preservation of meat via sustainable methods and packaging is an area of continued interest driven by the need to address food security. The use of biomaterial films and coatings has gained significant attention due to their non-toxicity and biodegradability compared with conventional synthetic films. Starch and chitosan are sustainable sources for the preparation of films/coatings owing to their relatively low cost, natural abundance derived from numerous sources, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and antimicrobial, antioxidant, and film-forming attributes. These remarkable features have notably increased the shelf life of meat by inhibiting lipid oxidation and microbial activity in food products. Furthermore, recent studies have successfully incorporated binary biopolymer (starch and chitosan) systems to combine their beneficial properties upon composite formation. This literature review from 2020 to the present reveals that chitosan- and starch-based films and coatings have potential to contribute to enhanced food security and safety measures whilst reducing environmental issues and improving sustainability, compared with conventional synthetic materials.
1. Introduction
In recent years, the global demand for meat has persistently increased owing to rising consumption, which has inspired the invention of better methods of packing and preservation [1]. Meat and its products are important components of human nutrition because they offer key nutrients that are difficult to obtain from plant-based sources [2]. The global consumption of meat proteins is expected to rise by 11% by 2031 compared with the base time average of 2019–2021, with income and population growth playing a major role [3]. However, the microbial degradation of meat is a challenging problem to address owing to its limited shelf life, stability-based nutritiion content, and high water activity. Other elements, such as oxygen and light, may also contribute to the loss of value by lipid oxidation, which reduces the shelf life and changes the physical aesthetics of meat products. Consequently, several techniques have been used to preserve meat products, such as coatings made of biodegradable biopolymers and edible films [4]. Generally, films are independent structures, prepared in their solid form (e.g., asheets, molded, or cast and dried), that are employed as a wrapping or packaging material for the preservation and protection of food. By comparison, coatings can serve as a defense barrier applied onto food surfaces through dipping or spraying, along with the potential drying of the coating. A key difference between films and coatings is that coatings are applied as thin liquid layers, whereas films are fabricated as solid sheets with a greater thickness as food wrap or packaging materials.
Biodegradable films/coatings sourced from starch [5], chitosan [6], gelatin [7], cellulose [8], etc., are preferred over petrochemical-based plastics due to their sustainability, bioactivity, biodegradability, abundance, non-toxicity, and food safety [9,10,11]. Moreover, the utilization of these biodegradable biopolymers helps to mitigate the environmental pollution and serious health effects that may occur due to the breakdown byproducts of conventional plastic films when discarded [12,13]. Therefore, researchers have sought to produce durable and biodegradable starch and chitosan coatings/films with strong antibacterial and antioxidant properties that can effectively retard spoilage and prolong the lifespan of meat.
Chitosan (Cht) is a unique alkaline polysaccharide found in nature, produced via the deacetylation of chitin (poly β-(1-4)-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine) [14,15]. Chitosan is a biopolymer comprising β-(1-4)-2-amino-D-glucose and β-(1-4)-2-acetamido-D-glucose units, which endow it with intrinsic antibacterial qualities [16]. Chitosan exhibits excellent film-forming properties, degradability, safety, and non-toxicity [6,17]. Its synthetic versatility and numerous qualities make it a prime choice for use in advanced food packaging films with unique features [18]. Nevertheless, it is crucial to recognize that films may often utilize chitosan as a primary material, despite some apparent disadvantages (e.g., inferior mechanical strength, resulting in poor water resistance and insufficient barrier resistance) [19]. Moreover, chitosan has inferior antioxidant and bacteriostatic properties due to its chemical inertness and comparatively poor H-atom donor capacity in relation to strong intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonding networks [20]. Thus, these constraints have slowed down the advancement of chitosan-based food packaging films.
On the other hand, starch (St) is a naturally available biopolymer that is used as a substitute for conventional synthetic biopolymers. Starch is edible, readily available, reasonably priced, biodegradable, and has favorable film-forming capacity. The major attributes of starch-based edible films include various merits: they are colorless, odorless, tasteless, transparent/translucent, and have low O2 permeability in low-to-moderate relative humidity environments [21]. Hence, starch-based edible coatings and films can be eaten with the food they are coated onto. This implies that starch is generally recognized as food-safe (GRAFS) and presents an attractive option as a suitable biomaterial. Starch coatings can also serve as carriers for food additives, such as antimicrobials and antioxidants [22]. In addition, these materials can increase the shelf life of products, and thus have drawn increasing attention in the food-preservation industry. However, there are certain drawbacks to starch-based films, such as their inferior mechanical properties and high water permeability [23]. To improve the properties of starch-based films, researchers have sought to combine them with other biopolymers and additives to yield biocomposites, which display unique properties relative to singular-component systems. Biopolymers such as chitosan, in various structural forms and size ranges (e.g., micro- to nanoparticles), can be incorporated into composite starch–film materials. In turn, chitosan biopolymer additives can enhance the biodegradability, barrier, and thermal and mechanical properties of the films, along with promoting antioxidant and antibacterial properties [24,25,26].
The dual blending of biopolymers such as starch and chitosan is an effective means of improving the properties of films/coatings. Several research studies have documented the production of higher-quality films due to the synergistic effects of these two additive biopolymers [27,28,29]. Lipatova et al. reported that the tensile strength, vapor, and elongation permeability of films increase with greater chitosan content. As well, the viscosity of the casting solution increases with greater chitosan content for corn starch/highly deacetylated chitosan and corn starch/low-deacetylated chitosan blends [30]. Deng et al. found that mechanical properties increased as the amount of 2-hydroxypropyl-trimethylammonium chloride chitosan (HTCCht) increased in HTCCht–amylose starch coatings. The optimal chitosan–amylose starch films showed an increase of 207% in tensile strength and an increase of 54% in elongation at break (EB), compared with the pure amylose starch film [31]. Moreover, Hasan et al. [32] established that the introduction of chitosan to brown rice starch samples caused the film’s water absorption capacity to decrease. The film showed outstanding water resistance when the amounts of chitosan and brown rice starch were varied [32]. Furthermore, when compared to chitosan coatings, a chitosan–starch aldehyde–catechin conjugate composite coating improved the preservation of pork meat [33].
Notwithstanding, the effectiveness of chitosan–starch coatings/films depends on the nature and types of chitosan and starch employed. Chitosan has a variable degree of deacetylation (DDAc) that depends on the source and extraction process, which could result in the production of chitosan with different molecular weights, influencing the properties of the resulting film. The molecular weight of chitosan is also known to influence the water vapor permeability of the film [30]. Moreover, in the production of chitosan–starch biofilm, the intrinsic properties of starch would determine the fundamental characteristics of the film produced. Different starch varieties can yield films with variable thickness, which can impact the barrier and mechanical qualities of films. In addition, there are two structural variants of starch (amylose and amylopectin) that could influence the nature of the film produced. A binary amylose-rich starch system may result in improved mechanical performance. However, a rigid structure may lead to low flexibility and challenges to film formation and effects due to gelatinization [34]. Therefore, recent studies have sought to optimize the concentration and types of chitosan and starch employed for film preparation.
Furthermore, natural active ingredients from various sources (such as Thymus kotschyanus essential oil [35]; Artemisia annua essential oil [36]; clove essential oil (CLO) [37]; Zanthoxylum Bungeanum essential oil [38]; Zanthoxylum limonella oil [39]; natural blueberry anthocyanin [17]; Cyclocarya paliurus flavonoids [40]; rosemary essential oils [41]; clitoria ternatea flower extract [42]; papain [43]; apple polyphenol extract [44]; Lycium barbarum leaf flavonoids [45]; pomegranate peel extract [35]; polyphenolic extract of waste petioles of betel leaf [46]; and red dragon fruit peel anthocyanin extract [47]) were introduced into chitosan–starch composites to act as reinforcing agents in packaging films. The introduction of these additives serves to address challenges related to the barrier and antibacterial properties that are commonly observed in chitosan–starch biofilms, although there may be issues related to the widespread application of these additives in food packaging. Essential oils have helped to inhibit microbial spoilage and to improve food quality and shelf life [48,49]. Notable studies have introduced terpenoids in essential oils, which act as hydrogen donors, singlet oxygen quenchers, transition metal chelators, and/or free-radical scavengers [49,50]. In addition, additives such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) have been included to improve the tensile strength of chitosan–starch blends [51]. Similarly, researchers have recently investigated an array of methods, such as the addition of different polymers (like cellulose, pectin, gelatin, etc.) and/or doping nanomaterials (like carbon nanotubes, ZnO, TiO2, etc.) to improve their characteristics and produce food-safe packaging for the preservation of meat products [17,36,52,53].
A body of research has been reported on the production, modification, and application of chitosan, starch, and chitosan–starch films and coatings in meat preservation. The continued interest in this area is demonstrated by active ongoing research [35,36,53,54]. Compared to existing reviews on food coatings and films, the present mini review focuses on the recent progress in the application of composite materials that contain chitosan and starch coatings as protective barriers for meat products, including the incorporation of innovative additives to improve film properties. Moreover, this overview highlights existing studies of composites that contain chitosan and starch that are under active research and development. In comparison with other categories of biopolymer films and coatings, the coverage of chitosan–starch systems has been sparsely reported, especially for the preservation of meat products. This contribution offers a detailed insight into the recent publications specifically related to films/coatings containing chitosan, starch, or chitosan–starch systems to address the food safety of meat products. This work emphasizes film packaging over conventional liquid coatings, as outlined in the studies presented. The coverage of this research spans the last four years (2020–2024), with a greater emphasis on studies from 2022 to the present. Antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant activities are highlighted for chitosan, starch, and chitosan–starch films/coatings, including the preparation of liquid formulations for applications involving dip coating and/or the spraying of meat products. The literature was sourced from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, and describes the preparation of chitosan, starch, and chitosan–starch systems and the usage of chitosan, starch, and chitosan–starch films/coatings for intelligent and sustainable food packaging systems. These composites have unique functional properties for maintaining meat quality, and have practical applications related to food safety and food security.
2. Chitosan-Based Coatings/Films for Meat Preservation
2.1. Brief Description of Chitosan
As indicated in § 1, chitosan can exist as a cationic polysaccharide in acidic media (various organic or inorganic acids) due to the presence of ionizable amine groups in the biopolymer. Chitosan is a derivative of chitin that can be generated via deacetylation under alkaline hydrolysis (Figure 1). Chitin is derived from various sources, including insect cuticles, fungi, and exoskeletons of crustaceans and mollusks [55,56,57]. In contrast to chitin, chitosan readily dissolves in aqueous acidic media (such as acetic and lactic acid) at pH conditions below its pKa (ca. 6.5) to afford the protonation of its amino groups, which are relevant to food preservation. Chitosan becomes insoluble at higher pH values above its pKa (ca. pH > 6.5), where deprotonation and a loss of charge occur. Studies have shown that the molecular weight and the degree of deacetylation (DDAc) of chitosan significantly impact its biopolymer structure, contributing to its biological (e.g., antioxidant and antibacterial) and physicochemical properties (e.g., crystallinity and viscosity) [13,55,58]. The degree of deacetylation determines the proportion of D-glucosamine units of the chitosan chain to the total amount of D-glucosamine and N-acetyl glucosamine units. Previous work indicates that chitosan with a greater DDAc offers enhanced antibacterial activity [59]. On the other hand, the molecular weight of chitosan influences its water-uptake capacity, biodegradability, viscosity, and hydrophilicity [60,61]. Chitosan with a greater molecular weight exhibits greater stability under thermal changes in the environment, where slower degradation occurs over time at ambient conditions during storage owing to its reduced porous structure and decreased water-uptake capacity [13,61].
Figure 1.
Molecular structure of chitin and chitosan. The circles denote the amino groups of chitosan.
2.2. Application of Chitosan in Food Packaging
Chitosan’s non-toxicity, biodegradability, and compatibility, along with its antibacterial and antioxidant qualities, make it a potentially useful addition to a variety of food applications [62]. Specifically, the ability of chitosan to form films and to serve as a gas and moisture barrier favors its potential application as an edible food coating and packaging material [63]. Consequently, researchers have sought to apply chitosan directly, as a coating or as a film, as a means of extending the shelf life and quality of meat and meat products. Hence, Abdel-Naeem and colleagues investigated the effectiveness of chitosan as a coating material to enhance its antioxidant activity, microbial purity, and sensory characteristics. In particular, chitosan was investigated as a means to prolong the shelf life of smoked herring fish during a three-month period of frozen storage at −18 °C [64]. By the conclusion of the first month of testing, the authors discovered that the aerobic plate count of the exposed (control) samples and the samples infused with 0.5% lactic acid were beyond the permissible limit (5 Log10 CFU/g) set by ES-288 (2005) [65] for smoked herring fish. Furthermore, the mold and yeast counts in these samples were higher than the recommended limit (should be pathogen-free) according to ES-288 (2005) [65]. On the other hand, samples coated with chitosan at varying concentrations (2%, 3%, and 4%) showed aerobic plate count levels within the allowable limit and the samples were devoid of mold and yeast up until the conclusion of the third month of refrigerated storage. These findings unequivocally revealed that the chitosan coatings, particularly at 3 wt.% and 4 wt.% concentrations, significantly inhibited the microbiological development of smoked herring and increased its shelf life [64].
2.3. Antibacterial and Antifungal Mechanism of Chitosan in Food Preservation
The most widely recognized antibacterial mechanism relies on the reaction between the microbial cell membrane (which has a negative surface charge) and chitosan (with a positive surface charge). This interaction occurs along with the chelation of specific ions from the lipopolysaccharide layer of the bacterial cell membrane, altering the permeability of the membrane and enabling the seepage of intracellular components. Arshad and Batool [66] demonstrate that chitosan coatings function as an oxygen barrier that impedes the proliferation of aerobic bacteria. This might be responsible for the notable decrease in aerobic plate count in chitosan-coated samples [64]. The ability of chitosan to inhibit sporulation and spore germination, as well as its polycationic nature, have helped to clarify its antifungal mechanism. Additionally, chitosan oligomers disseminate inside hyphae and obstruct enzyme activities. This causes fungus to proliferate. In addition, chitosan effectively serves as an antioxidant by impeding oxidation reactions by supplying free radicals with an electron or a hydrogen atom, which transforms them into stable radical intermediates and stops additional free-radical reactions [67,68]. Moreover, chitosan-coated products might exhibit low pH when compared to uncoated systems, and this can be attributed to the inhibitive effect of chitosan coatings against the liberation of lactic acid from chitosan biopolymers, in addition to the inhibitive effect against microbial growth, and the intrinsic actions of enzymes. On the other hand, a higher pH in uncoated samples could occur owing to the proliferation of bacteria that cause spoilage [69]. Thus, the antibacterial activity of chitosan is contingent upon several variables (e.g., temperature, pH, water solubility, concentration, deacetylation degree, and biopolymer molecular weight).
Other studies have sought to improve the antibacterial and antifungal properties of chitosan by blending it with other components such as gelatin, pectin, and essential oils, among others. A summary of the key findings related to various recent studies on the modification and application of chitosan-based films in meat preservation is listed in Table 1. An inspection of the various studies reveals that chitosan has intrinsic antimicrobial properties, which can be enhanced with the presence of additives (e.g., essential oils, antimicrobials, peptides, preservatives, and biopolymers) for various categories of meat (beef, pork, chicken, fish, and seafood). The film-forming properties of chitosan and its colloidal properties enable the formation of composite films and coatings, as evidenced by the various additives in the various systems outlined in Table 1. In addition to the antimicrobial properties of the various composites, variable resistance to yeast and fungi are reported, along with increased shelf life, resistance to moisture loss or water vapor permeability (WVP), and resistance to oxidation and UV due to the barrier properties of the films/coatings. The composite materials display variable properties due to the content and composition of the composites, including variations in thermal stability, wettability, flexibility, and mechanical properties (tensile strength (TS) and elongation at break (EB)). Table 1 provides an overview of various studies on chitosan-based composites that further elaborate on key findings regarding the properties of these materials.
Table 1.
Recent studies on the modification and application of chitosan-based films in meat preservation.
3. Starch-Based Coatings/Films for Meat Preservation
3.1. Brief Description of Starch
Starch is a low-cost, readily available, and biodegradable food ingredient with good film-forming properties. Starch molecules exist in two different forms: amylopectin, which has a more intricately branched structure, and amylose, a linear biopolymer. Amylopectin contains both α-1,4 and α-1,6 glycosidic links, whereas amylose has α-1,4 glycosidic bonds. Amylose has a molecular weight that ranges from 101 to 105 kD, comprises ca. 20–30% starch, and is insoluble in water. Due to its linear character, amylose content is instrumental in the development of films [87]. On the other hand, amylopectin assists starch granules in maintaining their peripheral crystalline structure (Figure 2). The concentrations of amylose and amylopectin in food are the main factors that determine its quality. This is due to the key role played by amylopectin and amylose in the functional properties, gelatinization, and retrogradation of starch [88,89].
Figure 2.
Molecular structure of starch, which exists as amylopectin and amylose.
3.2. Amylose–Amylopectin Ratios Influence the Structure and Properties of Starch-Based Films
Starch-based composites derived from various sources have different concentrations and ratios of amylose–amylopectin, along with different branch chain lengths, sizes, shapes, and chemical and physical properties. For instance, rice starch contains 28.58% amylose [90], 2.20% fat, 4.90% ash, 0.01% lipid, and 0.71% protein [91]. Potato starch granules comprise around 26.90% amylose [92], 75–80% amylopectin [93], and 1% additional minor components such as phosphate and lipids [93]. Cassava starch is typically reported to have an amylose content of 22.50% [94]. Corn starch contains about 25% linear amylose and 75% amylopectin [95]. Hence, Colussi et al. [96] noted that using different varieties of starch at the same concentration produced variations in film thickness with different film-forming solutions. In essence, the starch-based film made of wheat starch (0.189 mm) was the thinnest, followed by corn starch (0.196 mm) and potato starch (0.227 mm) as the thickest. The variations in film thickness resulted from differences in the composition of amylose for specific types of starch. The starch composition varied between 26.90% [92], 25% [95], and 20.90% [92] for the potato, corn, and wheat starches, respectively. Thus, it was determined that high amylose levels induce stronger hydrogen bond formation by increasing the degree of interaction among amylose molecules; this raises the film’s heterogeneity and the thickness of the film matrix [89,97].
In addition, starch with low amylopectin or high amylose content results in high tensile strength (TS) in starch-based films [98]. Compared to amorphous short-branched amylopectin, starch with high amylose content will form crystals with superior mechanical properties [99]. Chandla et al. [100] reported that films made from corn starch had the highest tensile strength (TS = 2.97 MPa), followed by films made from buckwheat starch (2.92 MPa), and films made from amaranth starch, with the lowest tensile strength (2.61 MPa). The amaranth starch film yielded the lowest tensile strength (TS) due to its extremely low amylose concentration (3.47%) in comparison to buckwheat starch (18.20%) and corn starch (25%). Moreover, comparing mung bean starch-based film to the films generated from cassava, sweet potato, and chestnut starch, Suhet al. [101] found that the mung bean film had the lowest elongation value and highest TS value. This was due to the higher amylose content exhibited by the mung bean starch (30.87%) compared to cassava starch (15.20%), sweet potato starch (21.70%), and chestnut starch (22.10%).
3.3. Application of Starch-Based Films in Meat Preservation
In contrast to chitosan, which has favorable coating/film formation properties and antimicrobial activity, starch films do not display intrinsic antimicrobial properties. In the absence of additives, starch films tend to be more brittle than chitosan-based systems, where the presence of additives results in improved mechanical properties. Table 2 provides a summary of the modification and application of starch-based films in the context of meat preservation. As noted in the various composite systems, starch is either combined with low-molecular-weight additives or an additional biopolymer with additives. As described above, starch can exist in two structural forms (amylose versus amylopectin), and certain plant sources contain a fractional variation in these two polysaccharides (e.g., corn starch versus potato starch). Furthermore, a high degree of amylose raises the moisture content (%) in films, and an elevated amount of moisture would accelerate the film’s microbial deterioration [89,98]. Consequently, edible films with a lower water content are favored since they can offer better protection and prolong the shelf life of meats. We conclude that the relative ratio of amylose and amylopectin in starch has a significant impact on the characteristics of starch-based films. Therefore, to circumvent the drawbacks of starch-based films, a large amount of research (cf. Table 2) has been reported on the use of additives (such as natural extracts, essential oils, metal oxides, carbon dots, phenolics, polyvinyl alcohol, or other biopolymers like alginate, gelatin, modified cellulose, etc.) to improve the properties of starch-based films in meat packaging applications. Similarly to the observations made for chitosan-based composites, starch-based composites also display variable physicochemical and antimicrobial properties according to the nature and composition of the mixed systems.
Table 2.
Recent studies on the modification and application of starch-based films in meat preservation.
In addition, variable resistance to yeast and fungi are reported, along with increased shelf life and reductions in water vapor permeability (WVP), UV, and oxidative resistance due to the barrier properties of the films/coatings. The composite materials display variable properties due to their nature and composition, including variability in thermal stability, wettability, flexibility, and mechanical properties. Table 2 provides an overview of some selected studies that cover a range of starch-based composites. An inspection of the results provides further elaboration on the key findings for the composites reported.
4. Chitosan- and Starch-Based Biocomposite Coatings/Films for Meat Preservation
4.1. Brief Discussion on Chitosan–Starch-Based Composites
Antibacterial films derived from amalgamations of starch and chitosan have garnered significant interest in recent years. The functional qualities of starch–chitosan films are enhanced owing to the blending of starch and chitosan as biocomposites (Figure 3). Chitosan is a functional supplement that imparts biomedical and nutritional qualities to food owing to its heavy-metal-binding capabilities, as well as hypocholesterolemic and antimicrobial properties [30]. Hence, studies have observed an increase in the antibacterial, film-forming, and mechanical properties of starch films incorporated with chitosan [29,112]. Biocomposite antibacterial films demonstrate outstanding mechanical behaviors and improved microstructural features, which are controlled by the interfacial bonding mechanism between chitosan and starch [27,28].
Figure 3.
A schematic illustration of a biocomposite film containing starch and chitosan that shows interchain hydrogen bonding interactions.
Unfortunately, the utility of chitosan for the preparation of starch–chitosan antibacterial films in aqueous media at a neutral pH has been constrained owing to its relative insolubility in alkaline solutions [113,114]. This challenge can be addressed by employing functionalized quaternary chitosan derivatives that possess greater solubility when immersed in aqueous media at a neutral pH [115]. The superb quaternized 2-hydroxypropyl-trimethylammonium chloride chitosan (HTCCht) has been effectively utilized as an antibacterial agent due to its enhanced water solubility over a broad range of pHs and notable broad spectrum of antibacterial action [116,117].
4.2. Antibacterial and Mechanical Attributes of Starch–Chitosan-Based Films
A study on the antibacterial activity of composites films containing HTCCht and amylose starch film was reported by Deng et al. [31]. In that study, glutaraldehyde (GA) was used as the cross-linker, amylose served as the matrix, and HTCCht served as the antibacterial additive in the biocomposite. The macromolecular chains of amylose starch and HTCCht were reported to become intertwined due to their intermolecular H bonds, which subsequently underwent cross-linking with glutaraldehyde (GA) through the Schiff base reaction. The mechanical attributes of the amylose films were enhanced by the composite formation between amylose starch and HTCCht. For the best HTCCht/amylose films, the elongation at break (EB) and tensile strength (TS) were increased by 109% and 207%, respectively, compared with single-component amylose films. Moreover, HTCCht/amylose films had a clear bacteriostatic activity, comparatively low cytotoxicity, and reduced transmittance in the UV spectral region, showing their potential to improve fresh meat preservation.
Furthermore, several investigations have evaluated the impact of the starch–chitosan ratio on the barrier and mechanical characteristics of biodegradable composite films [30,118]. A significant number of articles claim that when chitosan loading increases, the water vapor permeability of the films becomes reduced [119,120]. Moreover, it was found that using chitosan with an exceptionally high molecular weight caused films’ water vapor permeability to decrease [121,122]. In addition, contradictory information has been reported by different authors on the impact of chitosan loading on the tensile characteristics of composite films. According to several sources, the tensile strength of films either rises [119,120], reaches a maximum [123], or decreases [122] as the chitosan content increases. A possible explanation for this data disparity may be variations in the techniques used to prepare the film-forming mixtures, such as the sequence of addition of biopolymer additives.
In various studies, chitosan was found to be more successful in impeding the growth of Gram-positive bacteria than Gram-negative bacteria [124,125,126,127]. Gram-positive bacteria’s thick cell walls are often surrounded by protonated amino groups (−NH3+) of chitosan, which can create a barrier that blocks the flow of nutrients and oxygen necessary for metabolic processes [127]. Moreover, chitosan NPs in the smaller size range can immediately bind to the permeable outer cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria, which allows for rapid diffusion into the cells and disruption of the cell membrane, which causes intracellular content to leach out, causing cell death [26,124]. On the other hand, Gram-negative bacteria require chitosan to adhere to their outer membrane, which is composed of lipopolysaccharides, lipoproteins, and phospholipids. This process reduces the ability of chitosan to adhere to the cell wall domain. Nevertheless, the strong cell wall structure and hydrogen bonding between starch and chitosan contribute to delayed diffusion, which restricts chitosan’s ability to repel Gram-negative bacteria [124,127]. Furthermore, the non-volatile nature of chitosan diminishes the effectiveness of antibacterial agents against Gram-negative bacteria [26,124].
Hence, recent investigations (cf. Table 3) focus on the addition of other components, such as ZnO [126], thymol [25], and curcumin [128], among other additives, to starch–chitosan films to strengthen the films and their antibacterial properties. These additives possess antibacterial properties, either encapsulated by chitosan or directly incorporated into the films. This leads to a synergistic antibacterial action, as opposed to the inclusion of chitosan alone, thereby resulting in improved film properties such as antifungal and/or antibacterial properties. A remarkable example of a chitosan–starch-based film incorporated with Lonicera caerulea L. anthocyanins (LCA) was made by Li et al. [129], who prepared a pH- and NH3-responsive colorimetric film (PS-CH-LCA) based on potato starch (PS), chitosan, and LCA by adjusting the pH of the film-forming solution. This film was used to assess the freshness of shrimp in real time (Figure 4).
Table 3.
Recent studies on the modification and application of chitosan–starch-based films in meat preservation.
Figure 4.
The synthesis and application of a pH- and NH3-responsive colorimetric film (PS-CH-LCA) for assessing shrimp spoilage. Reproduced with permission from [129].
In contrast to starch-based films (cf. § 3), chitosan–starch systems offer certain advantages, including favorable coating/film formation, along with stable composites due to the favorable electrostatic interactions within chitosan–starch composites. Their mechanical, physicochemical, and antimicrobial properties bear parallel trends, as noted for the chitosan-based systems with various additives described in § 2. In many cases, synergism resulting from the biopolymer content and additives results in a maximum response, according to the properties of interest. Table 3 provides an overview of some selected studies that cover a diverse range of starch-based composites. The inspection of the tabular results provides further elaboration on the key findings of the systems reported.
5. Future Perspectives
The emergence of unique properties (physicochemical, biological, and mechanical) in biopolymer systems undergoing composite formation provides motivation for the development of materials that are limited only by our collective imagination [15,131,132,133,134]. Given the relatively simple structural features of chitosan and starch platforms, a wide array of materials can be developed that are guided by the principles of supramolecular chemistry, such as intermolecular interactions (e.g., electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonding) and solvation processes, such as hydrophobic effects [134,135,136]. Nevertheless, research on chitosan and starch has resulted in limited development toward commercially viable systems for packaging meat products (cf. Table 9 in [137]). This may relate to the use of the solvent casting technique for the preparation of films, which is not suitable for large-scale production due to cost considerations. Further research on other techniques such as the solvent-based extrusion or solid-phase extrusion of composites could aid in the synthesis of these films on a larger scale [24,137]. Moreover, the rational design of these composite materials for specific applications is impeded to some extent by the limited development of computational methods to gain further insight into the structure–function relationships of such biopolymer systems [138,139]. In this regard, future research is necessary to gain an improved understanding of the supramolecular chemistry of multicomponent biopolymer systems (including additives). Systematic studies that explore the preparation of composites and examine the role of structural factors are required to establish improved structure–function relationships. Structural factors include the molecular weight of biopolymers, bulk versus nano-chitosan, amylose versus amylopectin starch variants, composition, additive components, reagent addition sequences, and solvent effects [24,27]. An improved understanding of structure–function relationships can be advanced in the context of supramolecular chemistry, which will contribute to the field of biocomposites and their technological applications. To address food-security challenges, the development of coatings and films with multifunctional properties is required [129,133,134], including antimicrobial and barrier properties (oxygen, water) to enhance food safety and storage stability. In the future, it would be beneficial to use computational-based approaches to offer additional insights into the variables influencing the structure–function relationships of starch–chitosan composites. In addition, it is possible to further develop chitosan NPs [24] and nanocomposites using alternative strategies to achieve tailored physicochemical, biological, and mechanical properties [24,132,133]. As an alternative to conventional microbials and other additives in composites, the use of (non)metal oxides and organic additives can be tailored in unique ways to generate new properties that differ from conventional bulk materials [140]. Nanocomposites can offer sustainability advantages by minimizing the content of active ingredients (e.g., chitosan, antimicrobials), which can further contribute to food-safety metrics (e.g., antimicrobial activity and the leaching of additives) [24,140]. Hence, further in vivo and in vitro cytotoxicity studies are required to evaluate any potential adverse impacts of biocomposite coatings (starch–chitosan–additive systems) on food safety and security. By bridging these gaps, a greater understanding of molecular interactions and interfacial processes can be garnered to develop more effective composite formulations. In turn, addressing such knowledge gaps will support the commercialization of chitosan–starch films and coatings and advance the emerging and exciting field of carbohydrate-based biocomposites.
6. Conclusions
The manufacture of food packaging films and coatings that are highly biodegradable is crucial in tackling the environmental and health issues related to the use of plastic packaging derived from conventional petrochemical feedstocks. Chitosan and starch have emerged as attractive biomaterials to produce sustainable and biodegradable composite films, owing to their unique intrinsic properties. This study highlights the recent progress in the application of chitosan- and starch-based films for the preservation of meat products. It was observed that the molecular weight of chitosan and its degree of deacetylation significantly impact its physicochemical, mechanical, biological (antimicrobial and antifungal), and barrier properties due to the amino-group accessibility of chitosan. In the case of starch biopolymers, the amylose–amylopectin ratio, molecular weight, particle size, and morphology influence their chemical and physical properties. In addition to the role of additives, the intrinsic nature of starch and chitosan could impact the quality and durability of composite films derived from multi-component biopolymers. The recent studies presented have sought to incorporate various types of bioactive components that are not limited to essential oils, natural plant extracts, or nanoparticles to improve the antibacterial, antifungal, and mechanical properties of the studied films. Specifically, the combination of two biopolymers (chitosan and starch) along with additives can yield remarkably improved properties in coatings/films. Composite properties that surpass the additivity effects of singular biopolymer systems are a hallmark feature of composite materials. Continued interdisciplinary research in this field is anticipated to result in improved materials that will improve food safety and security in the food industry.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, L.D.W.; methodology, D.T.O.; formal analysis, D.T.O. and M.H.N.; resources, L.D.W.; writing—original draft preparation, D.T.O.; writing—review and editing, D.T.O., M.H.N. and L.D.W.; visualization, D.T.O.; supervision, L.D.W.; project administration, L.D.W.; funding acquisition, L.D.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
L.D.W. acknowledges the support of the Government of Saskatchewan (Ministry of Agriculture) through the Agriculture Development Fund (ADF Project number: 20210913).
Data Availability Statement
No data were used in this article beyond the references cited herein.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge that this work was carried out on Treaty 6 Territory and the Homeland of the Métis. As such, we pay our respect to the First Nations and Métis ancestors of this place and reaffirm our relationship with one another.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Abbreviations
Acylated pectin (AP); alginate (Alg); chitosan (Cht); apple polyphenol (AP); Artemisia annua essential oil (AAEO); 2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS); betel leaf petioles (BLPE); C. paliurus flavonoid (CPF); carbon nanodots (CNDs); carbon dots (CDs); carboxymethyl (CM); carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC); carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCht); cellulose (CE); chitosan (Cht); chitosan/curcumin nanoparticles (CCN); cinnamaldehyde (CIN); clitoria ternatea (CT); clitoria ternatea flower extract (CTE); clove essential oil (CLO); coconut shell liquid smoke (CSLS); corn starch (CS); curcuma hydroethanolic extract (CEE); degree of deacetylation (DDAc); 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH); Escherichia coli (E. coli); elongation at break (EB); essential oil (EO); Euryale ferox (EF); gallic acid (GA); garlic essential oil (GEO); gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS); gelatin (Gel); gelatin-based alkylated starch crystals (G-ASC); gelatin hydrolysate (GelH); generally recognized as food-safe (GRAFS); glutaraldehyde (GA); graphene oxide (GO); high dissolution (HD); 2-Hydroxypropyl-trimethylammonium chloride (HTC); HTC chitosan (HTCCht); konjac glucomannan (KGM); lactic acid (LA); layer-by-layer (LbL); low dissolution (LD); microencapsulated leaf flavonoids (MLFs); nano-biothermoplastic (NBP); nanoemulsion (NE); nanoparticles (NPs); nanocomposites (NCs); ovalbumin (OVA); oxygen transmission rate (OTR); oxygen transmission coefficient (OTC); pectin (Pec); polylactic acid (PLA); phloroglucinol (Phg); Pickering emulsion clove essential oil (PECEO); polybutylene itaconate (PBI); polyvinyl alcohol (PVA); polylactic acid (PLA); potato starch (PS); potato starch–guar gum (PSGG); pomegranate peel extract (PPE); porous starch anthocyanin–carboxymethyl cellulose (PS-ACMC); pullulan (P); red cabbage extract (RCE); Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus); starch (St); sulfur-modified montmorillonite (S-MMT); 2-Thiobarbitone (TBB); thiobarbituric acid (TBA); sodium alginate (SA); solid-phase microextraction (SPME); starch aldehyde–catechin conjugate (SACC); sweet whey (SW); tapioca starch (TSt); tensile strength (TS); thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS); Thymus kotschyanus essential oil (TKEO); total viable count (TVC); total volatile base nitrogen (TVB-N); Trachinotus blochii (T. blochii); vapor transmission rate (VTR); watermelon peel pectin (Wpp); water vapor permeability (WVP); water vapor transmission rate (WVTR); whey protein isolate (WPI); Zanthoxylum Bungeanum (ZB); Zanthoxylum limonella (Zl); Zataria multiflora essential oil (ZEO); ZEO nanoemulsion (NZEO); ZEO nanoemulsion with fortification (NZEOC).
References
- González, N.; Marquès, M.; Nadal, M.; Domingo, J.L. Meat consumption: Which are the current global risks? A review of recent (2010–2020) evidences. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Banda, L.J.; Tanganyika, J. Livestock provide more than food in smallholder production systems of developing countries. Anim. Front. 2021, 11, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD/FAO. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2022–2031; OECD: Paris, France, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Mauricio, R.A.; Campos, J.A.D.B.; Nassu, R.T. Meat with edible coating: Acceptance, purchase intention and neophobia. Food Res. Int. 2022, 154, 111002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, L.; Wang, X.; Mao, X.; He, L.; Li, C.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Y. Recent advances in starch-based coatings for the postharvest preservation of fruits and vegetables. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 328, 121736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flórez, M.; Guerra-Rodríguez, E.; Cazón, P.; Vázquez, M. Chitosan for food packaging: Recent advances in active and intelligent films. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 124, 107328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, R.; Santhosh, R.; Kumar, Y.; Suryavanshi, V.R.; Singhi, H.; Madhubabu, D.; Wickramarachchi, S.; Pal, K.; Sarkar, P. Characteristics and application of animal byproduct-based films and coatings in the packaging of food products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 140, 104143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Wu, H.; Hu, L. Recent Advances of Proteins, Polysaccharides and Lipids-Based Edible Films/Coatings for Food Packaging Applications: A Review. Food Biophys. 2024, 19, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, J.; Zhu, E.-Q.; Xu, G.-F.; Naik, N.; Murugadoss, V.; Ma, M.-G.; Guo, Z.; Shi, Z.-J. Overview of renewable polysaccharide-based composites for biodegradable food packaging applications. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 480–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manzoor, A.; Dar, A.H.; Pandey, V.K.; Shams, R.; Khan, S.; Panesar, P.S.; Kennedy, J.F.; Fayaz, U.; Khan, S.A. Recent insights into polysaccharide-based hydrogels and their potential applications in food sector: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 213, 987–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdulhameed, A.S.; Hapiz, A.; Musa, S.A.; Alothman, Z.A.; Wilson, L.D.; Jawad, A.H. Biomagnetic chitosan-ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether/organo-nanoclay nanocomposite for azo dye removal: A statistical modeling by response surface methodology. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 255, 128075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Chen, F.; Yang, Q.; Gong, W.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, G. An environmental food packaging material part I: A case study of life-cycle assessment (LCA) for bamboo fiber environmental tableware. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 194, 116279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heras, M.; Huang, C.-C.; Chang, C.-W.; Lu, K.-H. Trends in chitosan-based films and coatings: A systematic review of the incorporated biopreservatives, biological properties, and nanotechnology applications in meat preservation. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2024, 42, 101259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kou, S.G.; Peters, L.M.; Mucalo, M.R. Chitosan: A review of sources and preparation methods. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 169, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mir, M.; Wilson, L.D. Flax fiber-chitosan biocomposites with tailored structure and switchable physicochemical properties. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2023, 6, 100397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kou, S.G.; Peters, L.; Mucalo, M. Chitosan: A review of molecular structure, bioactivities and interactions with the human body and micro-organisms. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 282, 119132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zheng, D.; Cao, S.; Li, D.; Wu, Y.; Duan, P.; Liu, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y. Fabrication and characterization of chitosan/anthocyanin intelligent packaging film fortified by cellulose nanocrystal for shrimp preservation and visual freshness monitoring. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 264, 130692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Guo, M.; Jin, T.Z.; Arabi, S.A.; He, Q.; Ismail, B.B.; Hu, Y.; Liu, D. Antimicrobial and UV Blocking Properties of Composite Chitosan Films with Curcumin Grafted Cellulose Nanofiber. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 112, 106337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moalla, S.; Ammar, I.; Fauconnier, M.-L.; Danthine, S.; Blecker, C.; Besbes, S.; Attia, H. Development and characterization of chitosan films carrying Artemisia campestris antioxidants for potential use as active food packaging materials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 183, 254–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, Q.; Lan, W.; Xie, J. Phenolic acid-chitosan derivatives: An effective strategy to cope with food preservation problems. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 254, 127917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, C.-Y.; Li, D.; Wang, L.-J.; Wang, Y. Biodegradation behavior and digestive properties of starch-based film for food packaging—A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 6923–6945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FPelissari, F.M.; Ferreira, D.C.; Louzada, L.B.; dos Santos, F.; Corrêa, A.C.; Moreira, F.K.V.; Mattoso, L.H. Starch-Based Edible Films and Coatings: An Eco-Friendly Alternative for Food Packaging; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmasari, Y.; Yemiş, G.P. Characterization of ginger starch-based edible films incorporated with coconut shell liquid smoke by ultrasound treatment and application for ground beef. Meat Sci. 2022, 188, 108799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lipatova, I.; Yusova, A.; Makarova, L. Fabrication and characterization of starch films containing chitosan nanoparticles using in situ precipitation and mechanoactivation techniques. J. Food Eng. 2021, 304, 110593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Othman, S.H.; Othman, N.F.L.; Shapi’i, R.A.; Ariffin, S.H.; Yunos, K.F.M. Corn Starch/Chitosan Nanoparticles/Thymol Bio-Nanocomposite Films for Potential Food Packaging Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Othman, S.H.; Shapi’I, R.A.; Ronzi, N.D.A. Starch biopolymer films containing chitosan nanoparticles: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 329, 121735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shapi’i, R.A.; Othman, S.H.; Basha, R.K.; Naim, M.N. Mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of starch films incorporated with chitosan nanoparticles. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2022, 11, 1464–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bajer, D. Hypophosphite cross-linked starch succinate/chitosan membranes as alternative for packaging and pharmaceutical application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 249, 126103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yong, H.; Xu, F.; Yun, D.; Hu, H.; Liu, J. Antioxidant packaging films developed by in-situ cross-linking chitosan with dialdehyde starch-catechin conjugates. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 222, 3203–3214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lipatova, I.; Losev, N.; Makarova, L.; Rodicheva, J.; Burmistrov, V. Effect of composition and mechanoactivation on the properties of films based on starch and chitosans with high and low deacetylation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 239, 116245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deng, B.; Chen, J.; Li, S.; Liu, J.; Zhou, Z.; Qin, Z.; Wang, H.; Su, M.; Li, L.; Bai, Z. An antibacterial packaging film based on amylose starch with quaternary ammonium salt chitosan and its application for meat preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 261, 129706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, M.; Gopakumar, D.A.; Olaiya, N.; Zarlaida, F.; Alfian, A.; Aprinasari, C.; Alfatah, T.; Rizal, S.; Khalil, H.A. Evaluation of the thermomechanical properties and biodegradation of brown rice starch-based chitosan biodegradable composite films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 156, 896–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, H.; Yong, H.; Zong, S.; Jin, C.; Liu, J. Effect of chitosan/starch aldehyde-catechin conjugate composite coating on the quality and shelf life of fresh pork loins. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 5238–5249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Veiga-Santos, P.; dos Ouros, L.F. Starch-Based Packaging and Coating Polymers for Food; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2024; pp. 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehdizadeh, T.; Tajik, H.; Langroodi, A.M.; Molaei, R.; Mahmoudian, A. Chitosan-starch film containing pomegranate peel extract and Thymus kotschyanus essential oil can prolong the shelf life of beef. Meat Sci. 2020, 163, 108073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zheng, K.; Zhang, J.; Yang, F.; Wang, W.; Li, W.; Qin, C. Properties and biological activity of chitosan-coix seed starch films incorporated with nano zinc oxide and Artemisia annua essential oil for pork preservation. LWT 2022, 164, 113665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z.; Liu, H.; Tang, J.; He, B.; Yu, H.; Xu, X.; Li, C.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Su, Y. Pork preservation by antimicrobial films based on potato starch (PS) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and incorporated with clove essential oil (CLO) Pickering emulsion. Food Control 2023, 154, 109988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Tian, W.; Qin, X.; Wang, H.; Tan, L.; Liu, X. Chitosan/oxidized Konjac Glucomannan films incorporated with Zanthoxylum Bungeanum essential oil: A novel approach for extending the shelf life of meat. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 262, 129683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khruengsai, S.; Phoopanasaeng, P.; Sripahco, T.; Soykeabkaew, N.; Pripdeevech, P. Application of chitosan films incorporated with Zanthoxylum limonella essential oil for extending shelf life of pork. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 262, 129703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yan, J.; He, S.; Chen, L.; Chen, H.; Ouyang, K.; Wang, W. Effect of gelatin-chitosan-Cyclocarya paliurus flavonoids edible coating film on the preservation of chilled beef. LWT 2024, 199, 116138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsherif, W.M.; Zayed, G.M.; Tolba, A.O. Antimicrobial activity of chitosan- edible films containing a combination of carvacrol and rosemary nano-emulsion against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes for ground meat. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2024, 418, 110713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koshy, R.R.; Koshy, J.T.; Mary, S.K.; Sadanandan, S.; Jisha, S.; Pothan, L.A. Preparation of pH sensitive film based on starch/carbon nano dots incorporating anthocyanin for monitoring spoilage of pork. Food Control 2021, 126, 108039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wongphan, P.; Khowthong, M.; Supatrawiporn, T.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Novel edible starch films incorporating papain for meat tenderization. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 31, 100787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, L.; Peng, S.; Shi, C.; Li, C.; Hua, Z.; Cui, H. Preparation and characterization of cassava starch/sodium carboxymethyl cellulose edible film incorporating apple polyphenols. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 212, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xie, Q.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, G. Development and characterization of a new potato starch/watermelon peel pectin composite film loaded with TiO2 nanoparticles and microencapsulated Lycium barbarum leaf flavonoids and its use in the Tan mutton packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 252, 126532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nandi, S.; Guha, P. Development, characterization and application of starch-based film containing polyphenols of piper betle L. waste in chicken meat storage. Food Chem. 2024, 431, 137103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pramitasari, R.; Gunawicahya, L.N.; Anugrah, D.S.B. Development of an Indicator Film Based on Cassava Starch–Chitosan Incorporated with Red Dragon Fruit Peel Anthocyanin Extract. Polymers 2022, 14, 4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choo, K.W.; Lin, M.; Mustapha, A. Chitosan/acetylated starch composite films incorporated with essential oils: Physiochemical and antimicrobial properties. Food Biosci. 2021, 43, 101287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaudhari, A.K.; Das, S.; Dwivedi, A.; Dubey, N.K. Application of chitosan and other biopolymers based edible coatings containing essential oils as green and innovative strategy for preservation of perishable food products: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 127688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Dutta, J. Chitosan based nanocomposite films and coatings: Emerging antimicrobial food packaging alternatives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 97, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karua, C.S.; Sahoo, A. Synthesis and characterization of starch/chitosan composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 33, 5179–5183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.; Khan, A.; Ezati, P.; Ezati, P.; Rhim, J.-W.; Rhim, J.-W. Chitosan/Starch-Based Active Packaging Film with N, P-Doped Carbon Dots for Meat Packaging. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2023, 6, 1294–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, O.A.; Pellá, M.C.G.; Friedrich, J.C.C.; Pellá, M.G.; Beneton, A.G.; Faria, M.G.I.; Colauto, G.A.L.; Caetano, J.; Simões, M.R.; Dragunski, D.C. Effects of a Native Cassava Starch, Chitosan, and Gelatin-Based Edible Coating over Guavas (Psidium guajava L.). ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 1, 1247–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalczyk, D.; Karaś, M.; Kordowska-Wiater, M.; Skrzypek, T.; Kazimierczak, W. Inherently acidic films based on chitosan lactate-doped starches and pullulan as carries of nisin: A comparative study of controlled-release and antimicrobial properties. Food Chem. 2023, 404, 134760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatt, P.; Joshi, S.; Bayram, G.M.U.; Khati, P.; Simsek, H. Developments and application of chitosan-based adsorbents for wastewater treatments. Environ. Res. 2023, 226, 115530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oyekunle, D.T.; Omoleye, J.A. New process for synthesizing chitosan from snail shells. J. Physics Conf. Ser. 2019, 1299, 012089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oyekunle, D.T.; Omoleye, J.A. Extraction, characterization and kinetics of demineralization of chitin produced from snail shells of different particle sizes using 1.2 M HCl. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol. 2019, 10, 2011–2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Zhuang, S. Chitosan-based materials: Preparation, modification and application. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 355, 131825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, D.; Yu, Z.; Zhao, W.; Regenstein, J.M.; Xia, W. Advances in the application of chitosan as a sustainable bioactive material in food preservation. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 3782–3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Petroni, S.; Tagliaro, I.; Antonini, C.; D’arienzo, M.; Orsini, S.F.; Mano, J.F.; Brancato, V.; Borges, J.; Cipolla, L. Chitosan-Based Biomaterials: Insights into Chemistry, Properties, Devices, and Their Biomedical Applications. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva Alves, D.C.; Healy, B.; Pinto, L.A.D.A.; Cadaval, T.R.S.A., Jr.; Breslin, C.B. Recent Developments in Chitosan-Based Adsorbents for the Removal of Pollutants from Aqueous Environments. Molecules 2021, 26, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yilmaz Atay, H. Antibacterial Activity of Chitosan-Based Systems, In Functional Chitosan; Jana, S., Jana, S., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 457–489. [Google Scholar]
- Souza, V.G.L.; Pires, J.R.A.; Rodrigues, C.; Coelhoso, I.M.; Fernando, A.L. Chitosan Composites in Packaging Industry—Current Trends and Future Challenges. Polymers 2020, 12, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdel-Naeem, H.H.; Sallam, K.I.; Malak, N.M. Improvement of the microbial quality, antioxidant activity, phenolic and flavonoid contents, and shelf life of smoked herring (Clupea harengus) during frozen storage by using chitosan edible coating. Food Control 2021, 130, 108317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ES-288; Egyptian Standard for Smoked Fish. Egyptian Organization of Standardization and Quality: Cairo Governorate, Egypt, 2005.
- Arshad, M.S.; Batool, S.A. Natural antimicrobials, their sources and food safety. In Food Additives; Karunaratne, D.N., Pamunuwa, G., Eds.; InTech: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schreiber, S.B.; Bozell, J.J.; Hayes, D.G.; Zivanovic, S. Introduction of primary antioxidant activity to chitosan for application as a multifunctional food packaging material. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 33, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernando, S.S.; Jo, C.; Mudannayake, D.C.; Jayasena, D.D. An overview of the potential application of chitosan in meat and meat products. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 324, 121477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alboghbeish, H.; Khodanazary, A. The Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Refrigerated Carangoides coeruleopinnatus Fillets with Chitosan and Nanochitosan Coating. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2018, 19, 957–967. [Google Scholar]
- Kulawik, P.; Jamróz, E.; Tkaczewska, J.; Vlčko, T.; Zając, M.; Guzik, P.; Janik, M.; Tadele, W.; Golian, J.; Milosavljević, V. Application of antimicrobial chitosan-Furcellaran-hydrolysate gelatin edible coatings enriched with bioactive peptides in shelf-life extension of pork loin stored at 4 and −20 °C. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 254, 127865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; Tang, J.; Xu, M. Synergistic stabilization of garlic essential oil nanoemulsions by carboxymethyl chitosan/Tween 80 and application for coating preservation of chilled fresh pork. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 266, 131370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.; Guan, B.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, J.; Sun, T.; Dong, T.; Yun, X. Development of high barrier poly(l-actic acid)/chitosan/graphene oxide flexible films for meat packaging by layer-by-layer. Food Biosci. 2024, 60, 104304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsherief, M.F.; Devecioglu, D.; Saleh, M.N.; Karbancioglu-Guler, F.; Capanoglu, E. Chitosan/alginate/pectin biopolymer-based Nanoemulsions for improving the shelf life of refrigerated chicken breast. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 264, 130213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Liang, S.; Li, Y. Enhanced antioxidant and antibacterial activities of chitosan/zein nanoparticle Pickering emulsion-incorporated chitosan coatings in the presence of cinnamaldehyde and tea polyphenol. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 266, 131181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, R.; Liu, M.; Zeng, X.; Du, Q.; Wu, Z.; Guo, Y.; Tu, M.; Pan, D. Preparation of modified chitosan-based nano-TiO2–nisin composite packaging film and preservation mechanism applied to chilled pork. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 269, 131873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.; Riahi, Z.; Kim, J.T.; Rhim, J.-W. Chitosan/gelatin-based multifunctional films integrated with sulfur-functionalized chitin for active packaging applications. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 149, 109537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, H.; Wang, Y. Nanocomplexes film composed of gallic acid loaded ovalbumin/chitosan nanoparticles and pectin with excellent antibacterial activity: Preparation, characterization and application in coating preservation of salmon fillets. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 259, 128934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.; Lan, W.; Xu, Z.; Li, H.; Xie, J. Effects of active film based on chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol on the quality of refrigerated sea bass (Lateolabrax Japonicus) fillets. Food Biosci. 2024, 59, 103854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riahi, Z.; Khan, A.; Shin, G.H.; Rhim, J.-W.; Kim, J.T. Sustainable chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol composite film integrated with sulfur-modified montmorillonite for active food packaging applications. Prog. Org. Coat. 2024, 192, 108474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheerzad, S.; Khorrami, R.; Khanjari, A.; Gandomi, H.; Basti, A.A.; Khansavar, F. Improving chicken meat shelf-life: Coating with whey protein isolate, nanochitosan, bacterial nanocellulose, and cinnamon essential oil. LWT 2024, 197, 115912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhong, H.; Li, C.; Shi, C.; Cui, H.; Lin, L. Ethyl cellulose/gelatin-carboxymethyl chitosan bilayer films doped with Euryale ferox seed shell polyphenol for cooked meat preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 256, 128286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, R.; Wickramarachchi, S.; Pal, K.; Sarkar, P. Gelatin/chitosan-lactate/curcuma hydroethanolic extract-based antimicrobial films: Preparation, characterization, and application on chicken meat. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 154, 110075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondéjar-López, M.; Castillo, R.; Jiménez, A.J.L.; Gómez-Gómez, L.; Ahrazem, O.; Niza, E. Polysaccharide film containing cinnamaldehyde-chitosan nanoparticles, a new eco-packaging material effective in meat preservation. Food Chem. 2024, 437, 137710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kulawik, P.; Jamróz, E.; Janik, M.; Tkaczewska, J.; Krzyściak, P.; Skóra, M.; Guzik, P.; Milosavljević, V.; Tadele, W. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of chitosan-furcellaran-gelatin hydrolysate coatings enhanced with bioactive peptides. Food Control 2023, 153, 109931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Qu, S.; Ma, P.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, K.; Chen, L.; Huang, Q.; Zou, G.; Tang, H. Effects of chitosan coating combined with thermal treatment on physicochemical properties, bacterial diversity and volatile flavor of braised duck meat during refrigerated storage. Food Res. Int. 2023, 167, 112627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Kang, S.; Xue, J.; Chen, S.; Yang, W.; Yan, B.; Liu, D. Self-assembled carboxymethyl chitosan/zinc alginate composite film with excellent water resistant and antimicrobial properties for chilled meat preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 247, 125752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehboob, S.; Ali, T.M.; Sheikh, M.; Hasnain, A. Effects of cross linking and/or acetylation on sorghum starch and film characteristics. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subroto, E. Review on the Analysis Methods of Starch, Amylose, Amylopectinin Food and Agricultural Products. Int. J. Emerg. Trends Eng. Res. 2020, 8, 3519–3524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putri, T.R.; Adhitasari, A.; Paramita, V.; Yulianto, M.E.; Ariyanto, H.D. Effect of different starch on the characteristics of edible film as functional packaging in fresh meat or meat products: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 87, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govindaraju, I.; Zhuo, G.-Y.; Chakraborty, I.; Melanthota, S.K.; Mal, S.S.; Sarmah, B.; Baruah, V.J.; Mahato, K.K.; Mazumder, N. Investigation of structural and physico-chemical properties of rice starch with varied amylose content: A combined microscopy, spectroscopy, and thermal study. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 122, 107093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, R.; Saberi, B.; Pristijono, P.; Golding, J.; Stathopoulos, C.; Scarlett, C.; Bowyer, M.; Vuong, Q. Characterization of rice starch-ι-carrageenan biodegradable edible film. Effect of stearic acid on the film properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 93, 952–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stawski, D. New determination method of amylose content in potato starch. Food Chem. 2008, 110, 777–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X. Modification of Potato Starch Granule Structure and Morphology in Planta by Expression of Starch Binding Domain Fusion Proteins Xingfeng Huang. PhD. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2010. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/29241345.pdf (accessed on 19 May 2024).
- Abioye, V.; Adeyemi, I.; Akinwande, B.; Kulakow, P.; Maziya-Dixon, B. Effect of steam cooking and storage time on the formation of resistant starch and functional properties of cassava starch. Cogent Food Agric. 2017, 3, 1296401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.K.; Moon, Y.S. Corn Starch: Quality and Quantity Improvement for Industrial Uses. Plants 2021, 11, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colussi, R.; do Nascimento, L.Á.; Singh, J. Potential Use of Starch From Different Sources in the Preparation of Mucoadhesive Films Uso Potencial De Amido De Diferentes Fontes Na Preparação De Filmes Mucoadesivos. Rev. CIATEC 2021, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Sondari, D.; Falah, F.; Suryaningrum, R.; Sari, F.P.; Septefani, A.A.; Restu, W.K.; Sampora, Y. Biofilm Based on Modified Sago Starch: Preparation and Characterization. Reaktor 2019, 19, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabriel, A.A.; Solikhah, A.F.; Rahmawati, A.Y. Tensile Strength and Elongation Testing for Starch-Based Bioplastics using Melt Intercalation Method: A Review. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1858, 012028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, G.P.; Bangar, S.P.; Yang, T.; Trif, M.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, D. Effect on the Properties of Edible Starch-Based Films by the Incorporation of Additives: A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chandla, N.K.; Khatkar, S.K.; Singh, S.; Saxena, D.C.; Jindal, N.; Bansal, V.; Wakchaure, N. Tensile Strength and Solubility Studies of Edible Biodegradable Films Developed from Pseudo-cereal Starches: An Inclusive Comparison with Commercial Corn Starch. Asian J. Dairy Food Res. 2020, 39, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suh, J.H.; Ock, S.Y.; Park, G.D.; Lee, M.H.; Park, H.J. Effect of moisture content on the heat-sealing property of starch films from different botanical sources. Polym. Test. 2020, 89, 106612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Hu, X.; Huang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zou, X.; Shi, J. Preparation of edible antibacterial films based on corn starch /carbon nanodots for bioactive food packaging. Food Chem. 2024, 444, 138467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quilez-Molina, A.I.; Merino, D.; Dumon, M. Porous starch embedded with anthocyanins-CMC coating as bifunctional packaging with seafood freshness monitoring properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 154, 110114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vidal, N.P.; Charlampita, M.C.; Spotti, M.J.; Martinez, M.M. Multifunctional phloroglucinol-loaded pea starch coating for refrigerated salmon. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2024, 43, 101277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández-Nolasco, Z.; Ríos-Corripio, M.A.; Hidalgo-Contreras, J.V.; Castellano, P.H.; Rubio-Rosas, E.; Hernández-Cázares, A.S. Optimization of sodium alginate, taro starch and lactic acid based biodegradable films: Antimicrobial effect on a meat product. LWT 2024, 192, 115718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adame, M.Y.; Shi, C.; Li, C.; Aziz, T.; Alharbi, M.; Cui, H.; Lin, L. Fabrication and characterization of pullulan/tapioca starch-based antibacterial films incorporated with Litsea cubeba essential oil for meat preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 268, 131775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandrasekar, C.M.; Nespoli, L.; Bellesia, T.; Ghaani, M.; Farris, S.; Romano, D. Fabrication of double layer nanoparticle infused starch-based thermoplastic food packaging system for meat preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 254, 127689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Zhang, F.; Yu, R.; Zheng, H.; Wang, P. Acylated pectin/gelatin-based films incorporated with alkylated starch crystals: Characterization, antioxidant and antibacterial activities, and coating preservation effects on golden pomfret. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 241, 124532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández-García, E.; Vargas, M.; Chiralt, A. Starch-polyester bilayer films with phenolic acids for pork meat preservation. Food Chem. 2022, 385, 132650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abbasi, Z.; Aminzare, M.; Azar, H.H.; Rostamizadeh, K. Effect of corn starch coating incorporated with nanoemulsion of Zataria multiflora essential oil fortified with cinnamaldehyde on microbial quality of fresh chicken meat and fate of inoculated Listeria monocytogenes. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 2677–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sanches, M.A.R.; Camelo-Silva, C.; da Silva Carvalho, C.; de Mello, J.R.; Barroso, N.G.; da Silva Barros, E.L.; Silva, P.P.; Pertuzatti, P.B. Active packaging with starch, red cabbage extract and sweet whey: Characterization and application in meat. LWT 2021, 135, 110275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L.; Lv, S.; Wei, D.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S.; Li, Z.; Liu, L.; He, T. Structure and properties of starch/chitosan food packaging film containing ultra-low dosage GO with barrier and antibacterial. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 137, 108329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bi, S.; Qin, D.; Yuan, S.; Cheng, X.; Chen, X. Homogeneous modification of chitin and chitosan based on an alkali/urea soluble system and their applications in biomedical engineering. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 9318–9333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oyekunle, D.T.; Omoleye, J.A. Effect of particle sizes on the kinetics of demineralization of snail shell for chitin synthesis using acetic acid. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, X.; Xing, R.; Xu, C.; Liu, S.; Qin, Y.; Li, K.; Yu, H.; Li, P. Immunostimulatory effect of chitosan and quaternary chitosan: A review of potential vaccine adjuvants. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 264, 118050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, W.; Gu, J.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, S. Tailorable antibacterial and cytotoxic chitosan derivatives by introducing quaternary ammonium salt and sulfobetaine. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 218, 992–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Y.; Wu, H.; Xie, T.; Chen, L.; Hu, S.; Tian, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J. Characterization and antibacterial effect of quaternized chitosan anchored cellulose beads. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155, 1325–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, N.; Qin, Y.; Xi, T.; Xiong, L.; Sun, Q. Effect of chitosan on the antibacterial and physical properties of corn starch nanocomposite films. Starch-Starke 2016, 69, 1600114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonilla, J.; Atarés, L.; Vargas, M.; Chiralt, A. Properties of wheat starch film-forming dispersions and films as affected by chitosan addition. J. Food Eng. 2013, 114, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourtoom, T.; Chinnan, M.S. Preparation and properties of rice starch–chitosan blend biodegradable film. LWT 2008, 41, 1633–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bof, M.J.; Bordagaray, V.C.; Locaso, D.E.; García, M.A. Chitosan molecular weight effect on starch-composite film properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 51, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navarro, Y.M.; Soukup, K.; Jandová, V.; Gómez, M.M.; Solis, J.L.; Cruz, J.F.; Siche, R.; Šolcová, O.; Cruz, G.J.F. Starch/chitosan/glycerol films produced from low-value biomass: Effect of starch source and weight ratio on film properties. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1173, 012008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathew, S.; Brahmakumar, M.; Abraham, T.E. Abraham, Microstructural imaging and characterization of the mechanical, chemical, thermal, and swelling properties of starch–chitosan blend films. Biopolymers 2006, 82, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Babaee, M.; Garavand, F.; Rehman, A.; Jafarazadeh, S.; Amini, E.; Cacciotti, I. Biodegradability, physical, mechanical and antimicrobial attributes of starch nanocomposites containing chitosan nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 195, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garavand, Y.; Taheri-Garavand, A.; Garavand, F.; Shahbazi, F.; Khodaei, D.; Cacciotti, I. Starch-Polyvinyl Alcohol-Based Films Reinforced with Chitosan Nanoparticles: Physical, Mechanical, Structural, Thermal and Antimicrobial Properties. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.; Jia, X.; Zhi, C.; Jin, Z.; Miao, M. Improving the properties of starch-based antimicrobial composite films using ZnO-chitosan nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 210, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shapi’i, R.A.; Othman, S.H.; Nordin, N.; Basha, R.K.; Naim, M.N. Antimicrobial properties of starch films incorporated with chitosan nanoparticles: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 230, 115602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xin, S.; Xiao, L.; Dong, X.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Hu, X.; Sameen, D.E.; Qin, W.; Zhu, B. Preparation of chitosan/curcumin nanoparticles based zein and potato starch composite films for Schizothorax prenati fillet preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, B.; Bao, Y.; Li, J.; Bi, J.; Chen, Q.; Cui, H.; Wang, Y.; Tian, J.; Shu, C.; Wang, Y. A sub-freshness monitoring chitosan/starch-based colorimetric film for improving color recognition accuracy via controlling the pH value of the film-forming solution. Food Chem. 2022, 388, 132975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sheikhi, Z.; Mirmoghtadaie, L.; Abdolmaleki, K.; Khani, M.R.; Farhoodi, M.; Moradi, E.; Shokri, B.; Shojaee-Aliabadi, S. Characterization of physicochemical and antimicrobial properties of plasma-treated starch/chitosan composite film. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2021, 34, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anisimov, I.A.; Evitts, R.W.; Cree, D.E.; Wilson, L.D. Renewable Hybrid Biopolymer/Polyaniline Composites for Humidity Sensing. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2022, 4, 7204–7216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusrini, E.; Wilson, L.D.; Padmosoedarso, K.M.; Mawarni, D.P.; Sufyan, M.; Usman, A. Synthesis of Chitosan Capped Zinc Sulphide Nanoparticle Composites as an Antibacterial Agent for Liquid Handwash Disinfectant Applications. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yusof, W.R.W.; Awang, N.Y.F.; Laile, M.A.A.; Azizi, J.; Husaini, A.A.S.A.; Seeni, A.; Wilson, L.D.; Sabar, S. Chemically modified water-soluble chitosan derivatives: Modification strategies, biological activities, and applications. Polym. Technol. Mater. 2023, 62, 2182–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riseh, R.S.; Hassanisaadi, M.; Vatankhah, M.; Varma, R.S.; Thakur, V.K. Nano/Micro-Structural Supramolecular Biopolymers: Innovative Networks with the Boundless Potential in Sustainable Agriculture. Nano-Micro Lett. 2024, 16, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nakamura, K.; Kubota, R.; Aoyama, T.; Urayama, K.; Hamachi, I. Four distinct network patterns of supramolecular/polymer composite hydrogels controlled by formation kinetics and interfiber interactions. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, J.; Jin, S.; Yu, Y.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, F.; Xiao, H.; Yang, R.; Li, K.; Li, J. Supramolecular and double network strategy toward strong and antibacterial protein films by introducing waterborne polyurethane and quaternized chitosan. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 205, 117445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Guzmán, L.; Cabrera-Barjas, G.; Soria-Hernández, C.G.; Castaño, J.; Guadarrama-Lezama, A.Y.; Llamazares, S.R. Progress in Starch-Based Materials for Food Packaging Applications. Polysaccharides 2022, 3, 136–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Istiqomah, A.; Prasetyo, W.E.; Firdaus, M.; Kusumaningsih, T. Valorisation of lemongrass essential oils onto chitosan-starch film for sustainable active packaging: Greatly enhanced antibacterial and antioxidant activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 210, 669–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Faye, O.; Udoetok, I.A.; Szpunar, J.A.; Wilson, L.D. Hydrolyzed Forms of Cellulose and Its Metal Composites for Hydrogen Generation: An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusrini, E.; Safira, A.I.; Usman, A.; Prasetyanto, E.A.; Nugrahaningtyas, K.D.; Santosa, S.J.; Wilson, L.D. Nanocomposites of Terbium Sulfide Nanoparticles with a Chitosan Capping Agent for Antibacterial Applications. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



