Next Article in Journal
Manufacture of Hybrid Natural/Synthetic Fiber Woven Textiles for Use in Technical Biocomposites with Maximum Biobased Content
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of a Nanocomposite Based on Reduced Graphene Oxide and Gold Nanoparticles as an Electrochemical Platform for Detection of Sulfamethazine
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Mixing Procedures, Rubber Treatment, and Fibre Additives on Rubcrete Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nucleation of the β-polymorph in Composites of Poly(propylene) and Graphene Nanoplatelets
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Production and Mechanical Characterization of Graphene Micro-Ribbons

by
Maria Giovanna Pastore Carbone
1,
Georgia Tsoukleri
1,
Anastasios C. Manikas
1,2,
Eleni Makarona
3,
Christos Tsamis
3 and
Costas Galiotis
1,2,*
1
Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation of Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH/ICE-HT), Stadiou Street, Platani, 26504 Patras, Greece
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
3
Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, 15310 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2019, 3(2), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3020042
Submission received: 22 February 2019 / Revised: 21 March 2019 / Accepted: 3 April 2019 / Published: 16 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Graphene-based Nanocomposites)

Abstract

:
Patterning of graphene into micro- and nano-ribbons allows for tunability in emerging fields such as flexible electronic and optoelectronic devices, and is gaining interest for the production of more efficient reinforcement for composite materials. In this work we fabricate micro-ribbons from graphene synthesized via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) by combining ultraviolet (UV) photolithography and dry etching oxygen plasma treatments. We used Raman spectral imaging to confirm the effectiveness of the patterning procedure, which is suitable for large-area patterning of graphene on wafer-scale, and confirms that the quality of graphene remains unaltered. The produced micro-ribbons were finally transferred and embedded into a polymeric matrix and the mechanical response was investigated by in-situ mechanical investigation combining Raman spectroscopy and tensile/compressive tests.

1. Introduction

Graphene is a perfect 2D crystal of covalently bonded carbon atoms that is a promising candidate in a number of electrical, thermal, and mechanical applications, due to its exceptional physical properties [1]. In particular, due to its outstanding transport properties, graphene is the best candidate for producing transparent electrodes and optoelectronic devices [2]. The production of graphene sheets on large scales can be obtained from both physical and chemical routes, such as epitaxial growth on silicon carbide, chemical exfoliation and reduction of graphene oxide, as well as the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [3,4]. The mechanical cleavage of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) produces pristine graphene with low concentration of defects but the size, the thickness, and the location of the flakes cannot be controlled. Graphene derived from chemical processing are usually irregular in shape and are not suitable for integrated circuit or microdevice manufacturing. The CVD method yields reliable production of large-area and high-quality graphene films on a variety of metal substrates at relatively low cost. For practical applications in device manufacturing, however, several patterning techniques, such as optical lithography or electron beam lithography followed by lift off and plasma etching procedures, or femtosecond laser etching process, are required to tailor graphene sheets into the desired sizes and shapes [5,6]. One example is the production of graphene micro- and nano-ribbons as waveguiding strain sensors [7], chemiresistors [8], microsupercapacitors [9], and tunable tetrahertz metamaterials [10].
Graphene has also attracted great attention as a strengthening component in composites, as it is attributed a unique combination of mechanical properties in tension [11]. In this regard, the regular geometry of micro-ribbons is expected to ensure a uniform stress distribution [12] as well as to prevent the lateral buckling effect which is commonly induced by Poisson’s contraction in thin membranes and has been observed in supported graphenes [13]. In light of the above, graphene micro-ribbons could be exploited also as more efficient reinforcement in composite materials. However, to the best of our knowledge, experimental studies focused on investigating the mechanical performance of graphene micro-ribbons embedded in polymeric, which have not been reported to date in the literature.
The performance of graphene-based devices and of graphene-reinforced composites is strongly influenced by the interfacial properties between graphene and substrate materials. Hence, for applications that involve stretching or bending of the substrate, such as in flexible electronic devices, and in structural composites, it is essential to know whether the stress is efficiently transferred from the matrix/substrate to the graphene flakes. Raman spectroscopy has been successfully adopted to investigate deformation mechanisms of graphene and stress transfer in a variety of graphene-reinforced composites [14]. In fact, carbon-based materials show well-defined Raman spectra and their Raman bands are found to shift under the imposition of stress thus enabling stress-transfer between the matrix and reinforcing phase to be monitored [15].
In this work, the fabrication of micro-ribbons from large area graphene films synthesized via the CVD method with UV lithography and oxygen plasma processes is discussed. The design of micro-ribbons has been accurately performed taking into account some important experimental findings by our group [16]. Raman spectral imaging and atomic force microscopy (AFM) have been adopted to evaluate the effectiveness of the micropatterning process on wafer-scale and the quality of the final micro-ribbons. Finally, the produced micro-ribbons were transferred and embedded into a polymeric matrix, and their mechanical response in tension and compression was investigated by simultaneous Raman spectroscopy.

2. Materials and Methods

Graphene produced via CVD on 3-inch copper/silicon (Cu/Si) wafers was gently supplied by AIXTRON SE (Herzogenrath, Germany). Graphene micro-ribbons were produced directly on the Si/Cu wafer via UV standard lithography and oxygen plasma etching methods. The overall process for the production of graphene micro-ribbons and the transfer onto a polymer bar is schematized in Figure 1a. After the growth of graphene monolayers on a Cu/Si wafer, a thin layer (~1 μm thickness) of a photoresist AZ 726MIF (MicroChemicals GmbH, Ulm, Germany) was spin coated on top at 5000 rpm for 30 s and then was baked for 10 min at 95 °C. The mask was then loaded to the mask aligner and a positive UV standard lithographic process was performed for 7 s, and the sample was developed in AZ 726MIF developer solution for 1 min, rinsed with deionized (DI) water and dried gently with nitrogen. Next, the wafer was placed in the etching chamber for 30 s and, by following the below conditions: plasma excitation frequency = 13.56 MHz, power = 50 W, maximum vacuum = 10–4 mbar, pressure = 100 mTorr and oxygen N55 flow = 50 sccm, the uncovered graphene area was dry etched. Finally, acetone and 2-propanol were used to remove the remaining photoresist from the covered ribbons and the sample was rinsed with DI water and was dried gently with nitrogen.
The produced graphene micro-ribbons were finally embedded into a poly (methyl methacrylate; PMMA) substrate by using the “wet transfer” method (Figure 1b). According to this method, a thin transfer PMMA layer (~500 nm thickness) of 495 K molecular weight dissolved in anisole (MicroChem) was first spin coated on top of the surface of graphene micro-ribbons/Cu/Si wafer. The copper layer was then etched in 1M solution of ammonium persulphate (APS). PMMA/graphene micro-ribbons membrane was floating on the solution and then was rinsed in DI water. Finally, PMMA/graphene micro-ribbons thin film was “fished” by using a PMMA beam. During the transfer process, care has been taken to align the micro-ribbons to the PMMA beam axis.
Raman spectroscopy was used to evaluate the quality of the produced micro-ribbons. Raman spectra were recorded with the InVia Renishaw Raman system, under a 100× objective, using an Argon ion laser (514.5 nm) and a diode laser (785 nm) as the excitation sources. Laser power on sample was kept below 0.25 mW in order to avoid laser-induced heating. A motorized xy stage allowed the collection of a large amount of Raman spectra across the sample with a step size of 1 μm. By using the cantilever beam technique, uniaxial tensile and compressive loadings were applied to graphene micro-ribbons embedded into the PMMA, collecting simultaneously Raman spectra in the middle of the ribbons. The beam was bended first in tension by steps of 0.1%, and then in compression by steps of 0.05%, by simply changing the bending direction. The polarization of the incident light was kept parallel to the applied strain axis. Detailed description of the apparatus and of sample geometry have been reported elsewhere [16,17]. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was carried out with a commercial AFM (Dimension icon, Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) on micro-ribbons supported on PMMA films (i.e., before fishing procedure). The ScanAsyst mode was applied using a silicon nitride tip (Scanasyst-Air, Bruker, nom. tip radius 2 nm, nom. frep. 70 kHz, nom. spring constant of 0.4 N/m) with scan resolution of 512 samples per line. Height mode images were acquired simultaneously at a fixed scan rate (0.1 Hz) with a resolution of 512 × 512 pixels.

3. Results and Discussion

CVD Graphene Micro-Ribbons

After applying the photolithography/plasma process on the Gr/Cu/Si wafer, the fabricated graphene micro-ribbons were clearly observed under an optical microscope, due to the presence of the photoresist on top of them (Figure 2a) and detailed Raman mappings were conducted using 514.5 nm excitation wavelength. A characteristic contour mapping is presented in Figure 2b, where the blue areas correspond to the produced graphene micro-ribbons of several widths from 1 to 4.5 μm. The contour was similar to the pattern of the designed basic unit, verifying that the above described production process was successfully performed.
After transferring on a PMMA bar, the effectiveness of the whole fabrication process and the quality of the embedded graphene micro-ribbon/PMMA samples had been investigated by using detailed Raman maps. The characteristic contour maps of frequency positions and of full width at half maximum (FWHM) of both G and 2D peaks are given in Figure 3. The micro-ribbon appeared well aligned to the PMMA beam axis and showed a large distribution in the peak position and FWHM of 2D and G peaks, pointing to a micro-ribbon that is not perfectly flat, thus suggesting the presence of structural faults such as wrinkles, folds, substrate surface defects, and molecular trapping induced by the fabrication and transferring process.
Statistical analysis of the maps was performed and the mean values of positions and the FWHM of both 2D and G peaks are reported in Table 1. Based on the shift rates of the 2D and G Raman peaks for graphene flakes under biaxial tensile deformations [18], the compressive strain experienced by the micro-ribbon was estimated to be ~0.1%. Furthermore, the average value of the ratio of the intensities of 2D and G peaks was ~1.4, likely suggesting chemical doping induced by the transfer process on the PMMA (see Figures S1 and S2). The corrugation of graphene micro-ribbons supported on PMMA has been verified by AFM (Figure 4), revealing that the structure of graphene micro-ribbons is highly crumpled and that the polymeric substrate is not flat.
Finally, the embedded micro-ribbons were subjected to tension and compression, and Raman spectra were collected at each strain level. Representative Raman spectra in the G and 2D peaks spectral regions of graphene at several strain levels are shown in Figure 5, and the fitted positions of the G and of the 2D band as a function of strain are reported in Figure 6. In tension, it has been found that the positions of both 2D and G peaks show a linear behavior with strain—the strain sensitivity (from the linear part of the graph, red lines) of 2D was −14.8 cm−1/%, while the strain sensitivity of G was −5.7 cm−1/%. In compression, we found that the positions of both the 2D and G peaks exhibited a non-linear trend with strain. In particular, the average strain sensitivity in compression (from the linear part of the graph, red lines) of 2D was +12.3 cm−1/%, while the strain sensitivity of G was +5.1 cm−1/%. It should be noted here that G band splitting cannot be observed due to the low deformation level experienced by the ribbons. These values of strain sensitivities are in agreement with those found for CVD graphene membranes deposited on polymeric substrates [19], which confirms that the mechanical response of the micro-ribbons is not negatively affected after micro-patterning procedure. As observed by Li et al., strain sensitivity of the 2D peak of a wrinkled CVD graphene was found to be less than 25% of the strain sensitivity of a flat exfoliated graphene flake [19]. This unusual Raman band shift behavior was ascribed to the characteristic microstructure of CVD graphene—which is maintained in the graphene micro-ribbons (AFM image shown in Figure 4a)—and was modeled in terms of mechanically isolated graphene islands separated by the graphene wrinkles.
Furthermore, it is well established that the rate of Raman peak shift per unit strain of carbon-based materials can be related to their effective Young’s modulus [15]. Therefore, since it has been demonstrated that graphene with a modulus of 1 TPa presents a 2D peak shift rate of −55 cm−1/% strain [20] (for the 785 nm excitation line), it was then possible to evaluate the effective modulus of graphene micro-ribbons embedded in the PMMA matrix from the measured 2D band shift data ( d P o s ( 2 D ) d ε ) using the following expression:
E e f f = d P o s ( 2 D ) d ε × 1 T P a 55
By using the measured strain sensitivity in tension of the 2D peak, a value of effective Young’s modulus of 270 GPa was estimated, which is in agreement with reported values of Young’s modulus for wrinkled CVD graphene sheets [21]. Furthermore, by using the approach developed by Androulidakis et al. [20], we converted the Raman wavenumber vs. strain curves to true axial stress using the wavenumber per stress rates of −5.5 cm−1·GPa−1 (as determined for the 785 nm excitation). The results showed that the data in tension were quite linear up to a value of strain of 0.8%, which was the limit of the experimental apparatus employed in our work. No material failure was observed up to that strain level corresponding to a stress of ~2 GPa. In compression, monolayer graphene was expected to fail in air at very small strains (1 nanostrain) due to its almost zero thickness [16]. However, when embedded in polymer matrices both sides of the monoatomic membrane were prevented from out-of-plane deformation by the presence of the polymer. When the lateral van den Waals bonds eventually yield or fail at a critical lateral strain then the whole or part of the monolayer wrinkles and no further axial stress can be sustained. This corresponds to a compressive strain of 0.6% and a maximum axial stress of ~1.1 GPa, which is comparable to the compressive strength of carbon fibers, which fail by shear or bulging [20].

4. Conclusions

Micro- and nano-patterning of graphene in specific shapes is fundamental in real device applications. In particular, graphene micro-ribbons have attracted great attention as flexible electronic and optoelectronic devices, and could be potentially exploited as efficient reinforcements in composites. We have produced micro-ribbons of specific dimensions from CVD graphene by combining UV lithography and oxygen plasma treatment. Detailed Raman mapping has proved the effectiveness of the proposed method and has evidenced that the embedded micro-ribbons show a large distribution in the peak positions and FWHM of the G and 2D bands most probably due to structural faults such as wrinkles, folds, substrate surface defects, and molecular trapping induced by the fabrication and transferring process. Finally, the mechanical response of the PMMA-embedded micro-ribbons has been investigated by applying uniaxial tensile and compressive loadings to the sample, combined with the simultaneous collection of Raman spectra. The strain rates of both 2D and G peaks have been found in agreement with those typically observed for large membranes of CVD graphene, suggesting that the proposed micro-patterning procedure does not affect negatively the final mechanical response of the ribbons. Furthermore, the effective Young’s modulus of the embedded graphene micro-ribbons has been estimated and found to be 270 GPa, which is in agreement with typical values for wrinkled CVD graphene. The graphene micro-ribbons produced herein are stiffer than carbon nanofibers, and comparable in stiffness and compressive strength with carbon fibers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that important parameters such as Young’s modulus and compressive strength are reported for embedded graphene micro-ribbons.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2504-477X/3/2/42/s1, Figure S1: Characteristic Raman spectrum of the embedded graphene micro-ribbon; Figure S2: Pos(2D) vs. Pos(G) for two micro-ribbons.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G., C.T., and G.T.; methodology, G.T., E.M., and M.G.P.C.; data analysis, A.C.M, G.T., and M.G.P.C..; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.M., G.T., M.G.P.C., and C.G.; writing—review and editing, A.C.M., G.T., M.G.P.C., and C.G.; supervision, C.T. and C.G.; project administration, C.G.; funding acquisition, C.G.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant 2013) via project No. 321124, “Tailor Graphene”. The research project “Graphene Core 2, GA: 785219”, which is implemented under the EU-Horizon 2020 Research & Innovation Actions (RIA) and is financially supported by EC financed parts of the Graphene Flagship and the Open FET project “Development of continuous two-dimensional defect-free materials by liquid-metal catalytic routes” no. 736299-LMCat which is implemented under the EU-Horizon 2020 Research Executive Agency (REA) and is financially supported by EC.

Acknowledgments

John Parthenios and Kostas Papagelis are acknowledged for useful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bonaccorso, F.; Sun, Z.; Hasan, T.; Ferrari, A.C. Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nat. Photonics 2010, 4, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Avouris, P.; Dimitrakopoulos, C. Graphene: Synthesis and applications. Mater. Today 2012, 15, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Soldano, C.; Mahmood, A.; Dujardin, E. Production, properties and potential of graphene. Carbon 2010, 48, 2127–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, D.B.; Tian, H.; Yang, Y.; Xie, D.; Ren, T.L.; Zhang, Y.G. Scalable and Direct Growth of Graphene Micro Ribbons on Dielectric Substrates. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kalita, G.; Qi, L.T.; Namba, Y.; Wakita, K.; Umeno, M. Femtosecond laser induced micropatterning of graphene film. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 1569–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tian, H.; Shu, Y.; Cui, Y.L.; Mi, W.T.; Yang, Y.; Xie, D.; Ren, T.L. Scalable fabrication of high-performance and flexible graphene strain sensors. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 699–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Salehi-Khojin, A.; Estrada, D.; Lin, K.Y.; Bae, M.H.; Xiong, F.; Pop, E.; Masel, R.I. Polycrystalline Graphene Ribbons as Chemiresistors. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Niu, Z.Q.; Zhang, L.; Liu, L.; Zhu, B.W.; Dong, H.B.; Chen, X.D. All-Solid-State Flexible Ultrathin Micro-Supercapacitors Based on Graphene. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4035–4042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ju, L.; Geng, B.; Horng, J.; Girit, C.; Martin, M.; Hao, Z.; Bechtel, H.A.; Liang, X.; Zettl, A.; Shen, Y.R.; et al. Graphene plasmonics for tunable terahertz metamaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 630–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, C.; Wei, X.D.; Kysar, J.W.; Hone, J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 2008, 321, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gao, Y.W.; Hao, P. Mechanical properties of monolayer graphene under tensile and compressive loading. Physica E 2009, 41, 1561–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Androulidakis, C.; Koukaras, E.N.; Carbone, M.G.P.; Hadjinicolaou, M.; Galiotis, C. Wrinkling formation in simply-supported graphenes under tension and compression loadings. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 18180–18188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mohiuddin, T.M.G.; Lombardo, A.; Nair, R.R.; Bonetti, A.; Savini, G.; Jalil, R.; Bonini, N.; Basko, D.M.; Galiotis, C.; Marzari, N.; et al. Uniaxial strain in graphene by Raman spectroscopy: G peak splitting, Gruneisen parameters, and sample orientation. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 205433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Frank, O.; Tsoukleri, G.; Riaz, I.; Papagelis, K.; Parthenios, J.; Ferrari, A.C.; Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S.; Galiotis, C. Development of a universal stress sensor for graphene and carbon fibres. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Frank, O.; Tsoukleri, G.; Parthenios, J.; Papagelis, K.; Riaz, I.; Jalil, R.; Novoselov, K.S.; Galiotis, C. Compression Behavior of Single-Layer Graphenes. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3131–3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tsoukleri, G.; Parthenios, J.; Papagelis, K.; Jalil, R.; Ferrari, A.C.; Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S.; Galiotis, C. Subjecting a Graphene Monolayer to Tension and Compression. Small 2009, 5, 2397–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Androulidakis, C.; Koukaras, E.N.; Parthenios, J.; Kalosakas, G.; Papagelis, K.; Galiotis, C. Graphene flakes under controlled biaxial deformation. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 18219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Li, Z.; Kinloch, I.A.; Young, R.J.; Novoselov, K.S.; Anagnostopoulos, G.; Parthenios, J.; Galiotis, C.; Papagelis, K.; Lu, C.Y.; Britnell, L. Deformation of Wrinkled Graphene. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 3917–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Androulidakis, C.; Tsoukleri, G.; Koutroumanis, N.; Gkikas, G.; Pappas, P.; Parthenios, J.; Papagelis, K.; Galiotis, C. Experimentally derived axial stress-strain relations for two-dimensional materials such as monolayer graphene. Carbon 2015, 81, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, Q.Y.; Jing, G.; Zhou, Y.B.; Wang, Y.F.; Meng, J.; Bie, Y.Q.; Yu, D.P.; Liao, Z.M. Stretch-Induced Stiffness Enhancement of Graphene Grown by Chemical Vapor Deposition. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 1171–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Micro-patterning of CVD graphene micro-ribbons (a) and transfer onto polymeric matrix (b).
Figure 1. Micro-patterning of CVD graphene micro-ribbons (a) and transfer onto polymeric matrix (b).
Jcs 03 00042 g001
Figure 2. (a) Optical image of produced graphene micro ribbons on copper–silicon wafer after Lithography and Plasma etching process. The micro–ribbons are still covered by the AZ 726MIF photoresist, and (b) Raman mapping on graphene–copper–silicon wafer after dissolving AZ 726MIF photoresist. The blue color corresponds to the intensity of 2D peak.
Figure 2. (a) Optical image of produced graphene micro ribbons on copper–silicon wafer after Lithography and Plasma etching process. The micro–ribbons are still covered by the AZ 726MIF photoresist, and (b) Raman mapping on graphene–copper–silicon wafer after dissolving AZ 726MIF photoresist. The blue color corresponds to the intensity of 2D peak.
Jcs 03 00042 g002
Figure 3. Characteristic contour maps of (a) Pos(2D), (b) Pos(G), (c) FWHM (2D), and (d) FWHM(G) of PMMA-embedded graphene micro-ribbon.
Figure 3. Characteristic contour maps of (a) Pos(2D), (b) Pos(G), (c) FWHM (2D), and (d) FWHM(G) of PMMA-embedded graphene micro-ribbon.
Jcs 03 00042 g003
Figure 4. (a) AFM image of a graphene micro-ribbons supported on PMMA, and (b) the corresponding height profile of the inset red line. Blue arrows indicate the micro-ribbons.
Figure 4. (a) AFM image of a graphene micro-ribbons supported on PMMA, and (b) the corresponding height profile of the inset red line. Blue arrows indicate the micro-ribbons.
Jcs 03 00042 g004
Figure 5. Evolution of the G (a) and 2D (b) bands as a function of the strain, for the embedded CVD graphene micro-ribbons. The original measurements are plotted as points (blue for tension and red for compression). Solid lines represent Lorentzian fits to the experimental data.
Figure 5. Evolution of the G (a) and 2D (b) bands as a function of the strain, for the embedded CVD graphene micro-ribbons. The original measurements are plotted as points (blue for tension and red for compression). Solid lines represent Lorentzian fits to the experimental data.
Jcs 03 00042 g005
Figure 6. Position of G (a) and 2D (b) peaks versus strain for the embedded CVD graphene micro-ribbons. Solid lines represent fits to the experimental data.
Figure 6. Position of G (a) and 2D (b) peaks versus strain for the embedded CVD graphene micro-ribbons. Solid lines represent fits to the experimental data.
Jcs 03 00042 g006
Table 1. Mean values and standard deviation of the position and FWHM of G and 2D bands for the PMMA-embedded micro-ribbons.
Table 1. Mean values and standard deviation of the position and FWHM of G and 2D bands for the PMMA-embedded micro-ribbons.
PeakPosition (cm−1)FWHM (cm−1)
G1596.2 ± 0.713 ± 2
2D2612 ± 138 ± 2

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pastore Carbone, M.G.; Tsoukleri, G.; Manikas, A.C.; Makarona, E.; Tsamis, C.; Galiotis, C. Production and Mechanical Characterization of Graphene Micro-Ribbons. J. Compos. Sci. 2019, 3, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3020042

AMA Style

Pastore Carbone MG, Tsoukleri G, Manikas AC, Makarona E, Tsamis C, Galiotis C. Production and Mechanical Characterization of Graphene Micro-Ribbons. Journal of Composites Science. 2019; 3(2):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3020042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pastore Carbone, Maria Giovanna, Georgia Tsoukleri, Anastasios C. Manikas, Eleni Makarona, Christos Tsamis, and Costas Galiotis. 2019. "Production and Mechanical Characterization of Graphene Micro-Ribbons" Journal of Composites Science 3, no. 2: 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3020042

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop