LT-UVAM Milling of Thin Cellular Structures: Chip Fragmentation and Machinability
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Geometric Characteristics of the Cutting Tool and Description of the Alveolar Structure Studied
2.2. Description of Experimental and Numerical Approaches
3. Material Properties, Degradation Mechanisms and Failure Factors
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Comparison of Model and Experiment and the Contribution of Vibration Assistance to Machining Forces
4.2. Influence of Cutting Forces and Vibration Assistance on the Stability and Integrity of Thin Walls in Honeycomb Structures
4.3. Mechanisms of Adhesive Wear Evolution Under the Effect of Combined Ultrasonic Vibrations
4.4. Analysis of the Influence of Vibration Frequency on the Deformation of the Walls of a Cellular Structure
4.5. Chip Formation and Fragmentation Mechanisms in Conventional and Vibration-Assisted Machining
5. Conclusions
- LT-UVAM significantly reduces cutting forces over the entire spindle speed range, with the axial force (Fz) decreasing by 26–42% due to the intermittent cutting mechanism and reduced tool–workpiece contact.
- For ultra-thin honeycomb walls (0.01–0.04 mm), LT-UVAM decreases cutting forces by up to 60%, limiting wall deformation and preventing buckling, tearing, and plastic collapse.
- Ultrasonic vibrations with an amplitude of 25 µm effectively suppress adhesive wear and built-up edge formation, thereby reducing friction and significantly extending tool life.
- The cutting performance is highly sensitive to ultrasonic frequency. An optimal frequency of 22.5 kHz improves process stability and minimizes wall damage, whereas 20.5 kHz promotes undesirable structural resonance and deformation.
- The validated 3D finite element model accurately predicts machining behavior and demonstrates that LT-UVAM is an efficient and reliable solution for improving the precision, productivity, and sustainability of machining lightweight aerospace honeycomb structures.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ahmad, S.; Zhang, J.; Feng, P.; Yu, D.; Wu, Z.; Ke, M. Processing technologies for Nomex honeycomb composites (NHCs): A critical review. Compos. Struct. 2020, 250, 112545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, Y.; Liu, W.; Gao, W. Out-of-plane shear property analysis of Nomex honeycomb sandwich structure. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2021, 40, 165–175. [Google Scholar]
- Ndiaye, E.B.; Maréchal, P.; Duflo, H. Adhesion characterization and defect sizing of sandwich honeycomb composites. Ultrasonics 2015, 62, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ding, M.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Yao, S. A novel assembly technology of aluminum alloy honeycomb structure. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2010, 46, 1253–1258. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, K.; Ming, W.; Shen, L.; An, Q.; Chen, M. Study on the cutting force in machining of aluminum honeycomb core material. Compos. Struct. 2017, 164, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Z.; Tian, H.; Lu, Z.; Zhou, W. High-speed axial impact of aluminum honeycomb–Experiments and simulations. Compos. Part B Eng. 2014, 56, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ashab, A.S.M.; Ruan, D.; Lu, G.; Xu, S.; Wen, C. Experimental investigation of the mechanical behavior of aluminum honeycombs under quasi-static and dynamic indentation. Mater. Des. 2015, 74, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- An, Q.; Dang, J.; Ming, W.; Qiu, K.; Chen, M. Experimental and numerical studies on defect characteristics during milling of aluminum honeycomb core. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2019, 141, 031006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yip-Hoi, D.; Gill, D.; Gahan, J.; Travis, G.; Mackaay, L. Material stiffness and cutting parameters for honeycomb aluminum sandwich panel: A comparison with bulk material. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 34, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Y.; Gan, Y.; Liu, H.; Han, L.; Wang, J.; Liu, K. Surface quality improvement in machining an aluminum honeycomb by ice fixation. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2020, 33, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zarrouk, T.; Nouari, M.; Salhi, J.E.; Makich, H.; Salhi, M.; Atlati, S.; Salhi, N. Optimization of the milling process for aluminum honeycomb structures. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 119, 4733–4744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hirayama, A. Method for Cutting Honeycomb Core. U.S. Patent No. 6,740,268, 25 May 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, F.; Liu, J.; Li, L.; Shu, Q. Green machining of aluminum honeycomb treated using ice fixation in cryogenic. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 92, 943–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, F.; Wang, Y. Investigate on milling force of cryogenic cooling processing aluminum honeycomb treated by ice fixation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 98, 1253–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, F.; Wang, Y. Optimization of cryogenic milling parameters for aluminum honeycomb treated by ice fixation method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 99, 2271–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zarrouk, T.; Salhi, J.E.; Nouari, M.; Salhi, M.; Kodad, J. Influence of the cutting tool geometry on milling aluminum honeycomb structures. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2023, 126, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sun, J.; Dong, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Qin, Y.; Kang, R. Simulation and experimental study of ultrasonic cutting for aluminum honeycomb by disc cutter. Ultrasonics 2020, 103, 106102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kuo, C.; Chen, C.; Jiang, S.; Chen, Y. Effects of the tool geometry, cutting and ultrasonic vibration parameters on the cutting forces, tool wear, machined surface integrity and subsurface damages in routing of glass-fibre-reinforced honeycomb cores. J. Manuf. Process. 2023, 104, 59–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liang, Y.; Feng, F.; Cao, W.; Song, G.; Yuan, X.; Xu, J.; Yue, Q.; Pan, S.; Jiang, E.; Ma, Y.; et al. Multi-Scale Study on Ultrasonic Cutting of Nomex Honeycomb Composites of Disc Cutters. Materials 2025, 18, 3476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Liang, Y.; Feng, P.; Song, Z.; Zhu, S.; Wang, T.; Xu, J.; Yue, Q.; Jiang, E.; Ma, Y.; Song, G.; et al. Wear mechanisms of straight blade tool by dual-periodic impact platform. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2025, 288, 110031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zarrouk, T.; Nouari, M.; Salhi, J.E.; Benbouaza, A. Numerical simulation of rotary ultrasonic machining of the Nomex honeycomb composite structure. Machines 2024, 12, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jaafar, M. Étude Expérimentale et Simulation Numérique de L’usinage des Matériaux en Nids D’abeilles: Application au Fraisage des Structures Nomex® et Aluminium. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Z.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, G.; Ni, C.; Lin, B. Review of ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining in advanced materials. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2020, 156, 103594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, M.; Hong, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X. Investigating the Surface Quality of Aramid Honeycomb Materials Through Longitudinal–Torsional Ultrasonic Milling. Machines 2024, 12, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xiang, D.; Wu, B.; Yao, Y.; Liu, Z.; Feng, H. Ultrasonic longitudinal-torsional vibration-assisted cutting of Nomex® honeycomb-core composites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 100, 1521–1530. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, G.; Yu, X.; Gao, Z.; Xue, W.; Zheng, L. The modified Johnson-Cook strain-stress constitutive model according to the deformation behaviors of a Ni-W-Co-C alloy. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 20, 1020–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, X.; Ma, H.; Fan, F. Modified Johnson–Cook model of SWRH82B steel under different manufacturing and cold-drawing conditions. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2021, 186, 106894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Johnson, G.R.; Cook, W.H. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng. Fract. Mech. 1985, 21, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kang, P.; Youn, S.K.; Lim, J.H. Modification of the critical projectile diameter of honeycomb sandwich panel considering the channeling effect in hypervelocity impact. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2013, 29, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tie, B.; Tian, B.Y.; Aubry, D. Theoretical and numerical modeling of membrane and bending elastic wave propagation in honeycomb thin layers and sandwiches. J. Sound. Vib. 2016, 382, 100–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Burlayenko, V.N.; Sadowski, T. Effective elastic properties of foam-filled honeycomb cores of sandwich panels. Compos. Struct. 2010, 92, 2890–2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alberdi, A.; Artaza, T.; Suárez, A.; Rivero, A.; Girot, F. An experimental study on abrasive waterjet cutting of CFRP/Ti6Al4V stacks for drilling operations. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 86, 691–704. [Google Scholar]
- Dolatabadi, F. Étude de L’influence du Mode de Lubrification sur les Performances D’usinage du Composite à Matrices D’aluminium. Ph.D. Thesis, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada, 2010. [Google Scholar]










| Parameters Properties | Value |
|---|---|
| Reference density (g/cm3) | 2.78000 × 100 |
| Bulk modulus (kPa) | 7.90600 × 107 |
| Reference temperature (K) | 3.00000 × 102 |
| Specific heat (J/kg K) | 8.75000 × 102 |
| Shear modulus (kPa) | 2.76000 × 107 |
| Yield stress (kPa) | 1.40000 × 105 |
| Hardening constant (kPa) | 4.26000 × 105 |
| Hardening exponent | 3.40000 × 10−1 |
| Strain rate constant | 1.50000 × 10−2 |
| Thermal softening exponent | 1.00000 × 100 |
| Melting temperature (K) | 6.83000 × 102 |
| Ref. strain rate (/s) | 1.00000 × 100 |
| Strain rate correction | 1st Order |
| Plastic strain | 0.03500 × 100 |
| Parameters Properties | Value |
|---|---|
| d1 | 0.306 |
| d2 | 0.0446 |
| d3 | −1.72 |
| d4 | 0.0056 |
| d5 | 0.000 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Zarrouk, T.; Beldi, O.; Salhi, J.-E.; Jeyar, M.; Nouari, M.; Ding, W.; Barboucha, M. LT-UVAM Milling of Thin Cellular Structures: Chip Fragmentation and Machinability. J. Compos. Sci. 2026, 10, 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10080387
Zarrouk T, Beldi O, Salhi J-E, Jeyar M, Nouari M, Ding W, Barboucha M. LT-UVAM Milling of Thin Cellular Structures: Chip Fragmentation and Machinability. Journal of Composites Science. 2026; 10(8):387. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10080387
Chicago/Turabian StyleZarrouk, Tarik, Oussama Beldi, Jamal-Eddine Salhi, Mohammed Jeyar, Mohammed Nouari, Wenfeng Ding, and Mohammed Barboucha. 2026. "LT-UVAM Milling of Thin Cellular Structures: Chip Fragmentation and Machinability" Journal of Composites Science 10, no. 8: 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10080387
APA StyleZarrouk, T., Beldi, O., Salhi, J.-E., Jeyar, M., Nouari, M., Ding, W., & Barboucha, M. (2026). LT-UVAM Milling of Thin Cellular Structures: Chip Fragmentation and Machinability. Journal of Composites Science, 10(8), 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10080387

