Next Article in Journal
The Seismic Reduction Effect of Integrated Composite Isolation Bearings with Semi-Metallic Friction Tile Dampers
Previous Article in Journal
Application of the Transfer Function Method to Vibration Analysis of Functionally Graded Beams in Thermal Environments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bio-Inspired Functional Freedom: Additive Manufacturing Enables Roof Handle Design

School of Shipping and Maritime Studies, Guangzhou Maritime University, No. 101, Hongshan Third Road, Huangpu District, Guangzhou 510725, China
J. Compos. Sci. 2026, 10(7), 353; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10070353
Submission received: 11 May 2026 / Revised: 25 June 2026 / Accepted: 25 June 2026 / Published: 30 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Composites Manufacturing and Processing)

Abstract

The integration of additive manufacturing technology and biomimetic design provides new possibilities for functional and aesthetic innovation in automotive interiors. This study explores a roof handrail design method based on a spider web biomimetic structure from the perspectives of object character and design freedom. By transforming the spider web morphology of nature into a manufacturable parametric model, the organic unity of structural performance and visual aesthetics has been achieved. The simulation results show that the spider web biomimetic structure handrail distributed along the z-axis not only meets the mechanical performance (maximum stress of 189.11 MPa under 1500 N load) but also theoretically reduces weight by 32.03% compared to traditional designs. Material testing shows that the spider web biomimetic structure handrail made of PA6-CF material through fused deposition molding not only meets safety requirements but also has a better user experience. This study achieved organic forms that are difficult to process with traditional techniques through 3D printing technology, providing a new paradigm of “form following ecology” for automotive interior design and expanding the possibilities of functional components in user experience and spatial narrative.

1. Introduction

Contemporary automotive interior design is undergoing a paradigm shift from functionalism to experiential aesthetics, where the integration of lightweight engineering and biomimetic design creates new possibilities for the dialogue between art and technology. From the perspective of art and design disciplines, the roof handrail is not only a functional component but also an important carrier for the emotional and aesthetic transformation of the driving and riding space.
In this technological context, additive manufacturing technology has reconstructed the manufacturing paradigm with its disruptive production methods. By eliminating the physical limitations of traditional molds [1], the creative potential of complex geometric shapes has been unleashed, providing designers with unprecedented degrees of freedom in form. Scholars such as Yang [2] and Li [3] have promoted the process of lightweighting through material innovation, while Wellendorf [4] and Wang [5] have broken through traditional design boundaries through static simulation and additive manufacturing technology. These technological innovations provide a path for artistic expression of automotive lightweighting [6]. This digital layer-by-layer accumulation process not only improves material utilization to an almost ideal state [7] but also achieves agile transformation from concept to product by shortening the production chain, injecting unprecedented economy and creativity into engineering design. The mechanical aesthetics demonstrated by the lightweight transmission design of the Kartanas L [8], as well as the high-performance lithium batteries achieved by Liu [9] through additive manufacturing, are all confirming János Plocher’s [10] prediction that the manufacturing revolution is reshaping the DNA of industrial production. The use of topology methods in automotive structural optimization has also become a design trend. Jankovics [11] uses topology optimization methods to optimize the design of car frames, making them more suitable for additive manufacturing methods. Yue [12] used topological methods to optimize car seats for better shock absorption.
At the intersection of bionics and engineering design, spider web structures are reshaping lightweight design with their exquisite natural intelligence. Xu [13] elaborated on the significance of bionics in automotive interior design and proposed an interior design inspired by sea taro. Zhuo [14] revealed the excellent structural performance and adaptability of spider webs through observation and modeling, proving that spider webs can become objects of biomimetic engineering. The web dynamics model constructed by Zhao [15] from a multidisciplinary perspective has decoded the beauty of the spider’s eight-legged collaborative weaving algorithm. This kind of structural intelligence, derived from billions of years of evolution, has blossomed in engineering practice—from Liu’s [16] biomimetic modification of turbine blades to Zhang’s [17] medical titanium mesh, from Chi G’s [18] life-saving solution for the water collection device to optimal selection of reinforcement schemes for the reinforced concrete structure of old industrial plants by Wu [19], the spider web structure continues to break through application boundaries. The extraordinary mechanical properties of spider silk revealed by Ko Frank K [20] and the quantified energy dissipation mechanism by Safikhani Nasim, Mohsen [21] provide molecular-level annotations for Katrin Greta Hoffmann’s [22] “technology organic” aesthetics. When natural selection pressure meets human computational simulation, spider webs have transformed from hunting tools in the forest to topology optimization textbooks in the hands of engineers. Their structural language extends from microscopic fibers to macroscopic architecture, writing a design revolution across scales. The existing research on biomimetic lightweight structures and automotive interior components in additive manufacturing has made fruitful progress, but there is insufficient research on biomimetic lightweight design of automotive interior auxiliary functional components.
At present, research mainly focuses on the body frame, battery structure, seats, and other core load-bearing components. There is little research on small auxiliary internal components such as roof handrails. Most internal lightweight optimizations only pursue a single reduction in mass, without integrating biomimetic aesthetics, ergonomic elastic cushioning, and mechanical safety into a unified design framework. And current spider web biomimetic research focuses on the structural application in aerospace, medical treatment, architecture and other fields, and automobile research of additive manufacturing combined with biomimetic lattice structure also focuses on the single lightweight target of body and power components, but there are still areas not covered. In other words, there is less structural layout optimization for auxiliary parts inside the vehicle. This study takes the NIO U-shaped handrail as the carrier and transforms the growth algorithm of the Eight Trigrams spider web into a manufacturable subdivision surface through parametric modeling, making the radial mesh a physical channel for stress transmission and forming a biometric appearance. The strength and deformation distribution characteristics of the structure at different scales are analyzed through the layered simulation of micro-elements and planar modules. Compare the X/Y/Z multi-axis layout and complete the structure selection optimization. By comparing the suitability between the two additional materials and bionomics structure, the material selection basis is given in combination with the safety factor. The spider web biomimetic handrail made of PA6-CF material not only meets safety regulations in terms of strength but also has a certain degree of elastic deformation ability, which can provide effective cushioning effect and create a better user experience. This study explores the balance between material properties and design freedom under the empowerment of additive manufacturing technology by constructing a three-dimensional parametric model, finite element simulation optimization, and material performance comparison. Through simulation, sample printing and indoor static tensile test, the data interactive verification is finally realized. The aim is to create automotive interior components that combine lightweight functionality, mechanical reliability, and artistic aesthetic value, providing practical samples for cross-border innovation in automotive design.

2. Simulation and Experimental Methods

2.1. Simulation

The foundational modeling approach for the roof handrail design utilizes an actual NIO vehicle model as its basis. The structural parameters include a 17 cm longitudinal span, 2 cm lateral dimension, and 7 cm vertical elevation, yielding a total volume of 133.78 cm3. These handrail modeling graphics are shown in Figure 1.
This article simplifies the complex structure of the Eight Trigrams spider web into a simple geometric structure, which includes core structures such as capture filaments and radial filaments, as shown in Figure 1b, which is a biomimetic structure diagram of a hexagonal spider web. Three spider-web-inspired structures were devised for the layout of the roof handrails, as depicted in Figure 1c–e. To facilitate identification, each design was named according to the direction of the cutouts in the hollow sections of the spider’s web during the modeling phase. The theoretical volumes for the three modeling schemes are shown in Table 1, and the software used for 3D modeling is SOLIDWORKS (R) 2024 SP0.1. The simulation software used in this study is ANSYS 2024 R2. In the simulation model, the cell size for grid division is set to 1 mm, and the grid cells are divided automatically. By using default solver settings and relying on automatic program control solver parameters and convergence criteria, the requirements can be met. At the same time, as shown in Figure 1a, the inner ring surface where the pin is fixed is set as a fixed constraint position and the gravity effect is set in the direction of-y. Apply a load of corresponding magnitude on the stressed surface.
As shown in Figure 2, this study decomposes the handrail into countless hexagonal cylindrical structural units, each of which becomes a microscopic carrier for carrying design concepts. By applying equal loads to the six faces of two structural units for simulation comparison, the rigorous verification of structural performance and simulation deduction of design form tension are further constructed into planar blocks. By transforming the research perspective from micro to macro, exploring the stress distribution and deformation of different structural units under macro shear forces, not only does it reveal the mechanical secrets of the structure but it also provides aesthetic inspiration for the overall design of handrails, achieving an organic unity of functional rationality and artistic sensibility and interweaving technology and art in every structural detail.
The selection of PA6-CF and PLA Basic materials carries the dual consideration of material expression and process adaptability in artistic design. The mechanical properties of PA6 composites with various CF types and quantities [23]. PA6-CF endows products with reliable mechanical support due to its high strength and rigidity; PLA Basic is considered due to its affordable cost and easy processing characteristics. In this study, multidimensional performance simulations were conducted on two materials using simulation techniques. The selection of materials not only affects the physical properties of the products but also their texture and color, and texture can shape a unique driving atmosphere. The single-layer material properties of PLA Basic materials are isotropic, while the material properties of PA6-CF are affected by the distribution of carbon fibers. Therefore, this article sets the parameters based on the materials provided by the supplier. For the convenience of comparative analysis, Table 2 presents the material properties in the XY plane, i.e., the load direction. Combining the mechanical performance data of two materials in Table 2, based on the principles of design redundancy and safety, the minimum value is taken, focusing on the exploration of equivalent stress in the fiber direction. While ensuring functionality, free space is reserved for artistic styling design, striving to find a perfect balance between strength, elastic deformation energy, and artistic expression, making the roof handrail a practical and aesthetic artistic carrier in the car. The materials and 3D printers used in this study are both products of Shenzhen Bambu Lab, located in Shenzhen Special Economic Zone, Guangdong Province, China.

2.2. Experimental Procedure

Test specimens for this investigation were fabricated through additive manufacturing techniques with a layer thickness of approximately 0.127 mm [26]. The roof handrail digital model was processed through specialized software, with critical printing parameters detailed in Table 3. The Bambu x1cc printer (Shenzhen Bambu Lab, located in Shenzhen Special Economic Zone, Guangdong Province, China) utilized in this study operates on the fused deposition modeling principle. The sample will undergo a tensile test to test whether it can withstand the actual working load. The test sample is shown in Figure 3.
Customized clamping devices were developed in accordance with the mounting approach of automotive handrails and human grip dynamics, as depicted in Figure 4a,c. In the context of collaborative innovation between art design and engineering practice, the mechanical performance testing of the spider web biomimetic structure roof handrail is not only a rigorous experiment related to functional implementation but also an artistic verification of exploring material expression. We have selected a standardized tensile testing apparatus based on the general static tensile testing specifications for polymer composite materials. The machinery used in the experiment is a microcomputer-controlled electronic universal testing machine produced by Jinan Lian Tai Test Equipment Co., Ltd. (Taizhou, China), model WDW-100Y. The fixture specification is a customized U-shaped handrail matching fixture. During the experiment, the machine automatically records the clamping distance and load pressure. Align and calibrate the sample before each experiment to avoid eccentric tension. The loading protocol (quasi-static tensile standard) adopts displacement-controlled loading mode. Set the constant loading speed to 2 mm/min, with a load range of 0–1500 N; the preloading operation requires applying a small preloading force of 50 N for 10 s before formal loading to eliminate fixture and assembly gaps. The termination criterion for testing is that the test will automatically stop when the target load exceeds 1500 N. The data and curves obtained through experiments not only accurately outline the shape change trajectory of the handrail under unidirectional force but also visually reveal the different stages of material deformation under stress. The mutual verification of these data and simulation results ensures the reliability of product functions, enabling the roof handrail to demonstrate the unique aesthetic value of the interweaving of material and shape while meeting practical needs.

3. Simulation Paradigms

3.1. Simulation Analysis of Different Structural Units and Planar Systems

For the designed spider web simulation structure, one unit was selected for static simulation analysis, and the results are shown in the Figure 5. Unless otherwise specified, the default material is PA6-CF.
The spider web structural unit exhibits unique mechanical aesthetic characteristics: under the same load, its deformation behavior shows an organic gradient change. The concentrated deformation of the centerline of the external force surface forms elastic folds similar to those of biological tissues under compression. This controllable deformation pattern not only optimizes mechanical properties but also creates dynamic visual rhythms. Comparing Figure 5a,c, it can be seen that, compared to traditional structural units, the spider web structural unit undergoes greater deformation under the same load, but the deformation is concentrated on the external force surface and reaches its peak at the centerline of the surface. Looking at Figure 5b,d again, the spider web structural unit shows significant changes in stress distribution compared to traditional structural units. The area of the high stress distribution region decreases, with the most significant reduction being the stress at the core, radial filaments, and outer surface edges within the unit. However, the stress on the centerline of the outer surface is more concentrated, and the stress peak is higher than that of traditional structural units. The support of the spider web unit structure mainly relies on radial filaments. Simulation results show that this structure can effectively concentrate high stress in noncritical structural areas, allowing the centerline of the stress surface to experience high stress and certain deformation to ensure that the stress on the radial filaments is reduced. This can improve the strength and elastic deformation ability of the entire structure.
From the perspective of lattice mechanics, the hexagonal spider web unit forms an orthotropic bionic lattice system composed of radial load-bearing filaments and circumferential capture filaments, which constructs a hierarchical stress transfer mechanism inside the unit. When external tensile load acts on the contact surface, the load path evolves in two stages: the primary load transfers along the radial filaments as the main force-bearing channel to disperse most axial tensile stress to the fixed support boundary; the secondary load is shared by the circumferential interwoven filaments to realize lateral shear stress redistribution. Unlike the solid uniform lattice of traditional structural units with disordered stress diffusion, the biomimetic lattice actively guides stress flow through the directional layout of filaments, realizing active regulation of load path evolution. This lattice-induced stress partitioning effect concentrates high strain energy on the contact surface with low structural safety weight, while the core radial skeleton bears low-amplitude stable stress, fundamentally reducing the risk of local fatigue failure of the main load-bearing structure.
Integrating the unit structure into a simple planar block for simulation provides an innovative path for product design to transform structural performance into visual narrative, elevating the roof handrail from a simple functional component to carrying a dialogue between technology and nature. The deformation and stress of different structured planes were tested under macroscopic loads, and the results are shown in Figure 6.
From Figure 6a,b, it can be seen that the planar blocks composed of spider web structural units will undergo greater deformation, which is consistent with the derivation of previous unit simulations. In the comparison of another set of images, the planar block composed of spider web structure has a larger low stress area under the same load and effectively reduces stress concentration, making stress distribution more uniform.
Therefore, the spider web unit structure can allow for greater stress and optimize stress distribution and improve elastic deformation ability and other characteristics that can be applied to roof handrails. While achieving the goal of lightweight roof handrails, it can further optimize handrail performance, enhance handrail user experience, and redefine the aesthetic of automotive interior objects, elevating roof handrails from simple practical components to artistic designs that carry technological humanism.

3.2. Simulation Analysis of Handrails with Different Structures

In order to gain a mechanical understanding of the basic handrail structure, static simulations were conducted on traditional roof handrails made of PA6-CF material under tensile loads of 500 N, 1000 N, and 1500 N. Partial results are shown in Figure 7.
The specific simulation results are summarized in Table 4.
Analysis of Table 4 demonstrates that conventional handrail designs maintain stress distribution within PA6-CF material’s permissible strength thresholds under operational loads. On the other hand, the greater the tensile elastic deformation of the handrail structure, the more comfortable it will be for passengers to feel when using it. The Eight Trigrams Spider Web-inspired configuration achieves dual objectives of mass reduction and structural integrity [27], while exhibiting enhanced mechanical performance characteristics. From previous simulation results, it can be seen that it can improve stress distribution, enhance the overall elastic deformation ability of the structure, and improve the user experience of the handrail. In addition, the spider web structure has a high tolerance for defects, and other defects have a relatively small impact on its own performance when the supporting structure is intact [28]. Therefore, this study can remove a large number of redundant structures and simplify the spider web model.
Apply tension of 500 N, 1000 N, and 1500 N to three new handrail design models. The images in this study only show the simulation results under a load of 1500 N. The total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram are shown in Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10.
After classifying and organizing the simulation data, record the simulation data with a load of 500 N in Table 5. The analysis revealed that the z-axis-oriented biomimetic configuration demonstrated minimal peak stresses compared to alternative directional designs. Structural mechanics principles indicate that reduced maximum stress values under loading conditions correlate with enhanced structural integrity and operational safety. Therefore, the spider web biomimetic structure designed in the z-axis direction is more stable and safer.
Subsequent testing phases involving elevated tensions of 1000 N and 1500 N generated complementary datasets, which were systematically compiled in Table 6. This hierarchical data organization facilitates progressive analysis of structural behavior across varying load intensities. Analysis of Table 5 and Table 6 reveals that z-axis handrail designs exhibit higher equivalent stress values compared to conventional counterparts across multiple scenarios, though remaining within permissible material strength thresholds. In addition, if the total deformation increases without structural damage, it indicates that the new structure can improve elastic deformation to some extent. The Z-axis design scheme has higher deformation under safe conditions. Consequently, the z-axis spider web structural handrail demonstrates optimal performance under low-load conditions compared to alternative directional designs.
The PA6-CF material in this research comprises more than 25% carbon fiber content. This elevated carbon fiber concentration contributes to its brittle fracture characteristics [29]. Such brittle substances align with the first strength theory principles. Experimental data from Table 6 reveals that the peak equivalent stress in the x-axis configuration design has surpassed the material’s tensile strength threshold, attaining 273.3 MPa. Under 1500 N loading conditions, the highest equivalent stress values exceed the permissible material strength parameters outlined in Table 2. Consequently, the structural design demonstrates inadequate performance under elevated loading conditions.
When the load of the spider web biomimetic structure handrail designed in the y-axis direction reaches 1500 N, the peak equivalent stress has already exceeded the minimum conservative value of tensile strength. According to the first strength theory, there is a possibility of partial failure in the high stress concentration area inside. This phenomenon accelerates material fatigue development, thereby shortening the operational lifespan compared to z-axis designs. Comparative analysis reveals the z-axis configuration maintains equivalent stress levels below critical thresholds under identical loading conditions.
Further analysis of the overall load path evolution of three lattice layout schemes from macro mechanical perspective can explain the essential difference in their stress levels. For the X-axis and Y-axis biomimetic lattice, the stress cannot be continuously transmitted along radial filaments to the fixed constraint end, forming multiple stress stagnation zones inside the hollow lattice, which results in sharp stress concentration and excessive peak equivalent stress under 1000 N and 1500 N loads. In contrast, in the Z-axis spider web, the radial filaments form a continuous linear stress transfer channel from the grip surface to the fixed base, and the circumferential auxiliary filaments realize transverse load homogenization. The whole load path evolves smoothly without obvious stress blocking points, which restrains the maximum equivalent stress within the allowable range of PA6-CF and avoids premature material yield or fracture. The directional matching between lattice skeleton and main load vector is the core reason why the Z-axis layout balances lightweight, safety and elastic deformation performance.
The z-axis biomimetic handrail design demonstrates multiple performance advantages. Beyond ensuring structural safety compliance, computational models indicate potential mass reduction reaching 32.03% through optimized material distribution. This design configuration simultaneously enhances elastic deformation capacity while effectively minimizing peak stress concentrations.

3.3. Simulation Analysis of Handrails Made of Different Materials

From the previous analysis, this work has determined the superiority of the z-axis scheme. Therefore, the next step is to simulate and compare the materials. The new structural scheme only retains the Z-axis scheme.
When a tensile force of 1500 N is applied to the traditional handrail made of PLA Basic material, the total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram are shown in Figure 11.
When a tensile force of 1500 N is applied to the handrail of PLA Basic material designed along the z-axis, the total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram are shown in Figure 12.
For the convenience of analysis and comparison, the simulation data that is not displayed will be organized together with the data in the above figure into Table 7. By analyzing the simulation results, it can be concluded that PLA Basic material handrails have smaller equivalent stress peaks under the same load. However, handrails made of PA6-CF material have a greater maximum total deformation.
In order to clarify whether the handrails made of these two materials can be used, a safety factor index has been introduced. Under extreme loading conditions of 1500 N, the safety coefficients for biomimetic spider web structure handrails were computed. Experimental data from Table 2 indicates PA6-CF’s tensile strength reaches 210 MPa compared to PLA-based material’s 50 MPa. As shown in Table 7, peak equivalent stresses measure 189.1 MPa for PA6-CF and 38.5 MPa for PLA variants. Consequently, PA6-CF handrails demonstrate a safety factor of 1.11, while PLA-based units achieve 1.3, both exceeding the minimum requirement of 1.
However, this study emphasizes the coordination between handrail industry aesthetics and ergonomics. The PA6-CF material exhibits superior elastic deformation characteristics, enabling enhanced adaptability for optimizing user experience through innovative design solutions. The difference in elastic deformation and stress response between the two materials can also be explained by the coupling law of material anisotropy and lattice stress transfer mechanism. PLA Basic is an isotropic polymer, and the load path inside the spider web lattice evolves uniformly in all directions without directional bias; the stress transfer efficiency of radial and circumferential filaments is consistent, so the overall stress peak is low but the elastic energy storage capacity is limited. As a carbon-fiber-reinforced anisotropic composite, PA6-CF forms a dual-level stress transfer system; the bionic spider web lattice dominates the macroscopic load path distribution, while the internal carbon fiber orientation dominates the microscopic interlayer stress transmission. Under tensile load, the load path evolves along the fiber direction consistent with radial filaments, which improves the axial stress transfer efficiency of the lattice, enhances the elastic deformation energy dissipation capacity of the whole structure, and provides a buffer effect for human grip impact load. This coupling effect of biomimetic lattice layout and fiber anisotropic reinforcement realizes the coordinated evolution of load path and stress transfer channel under dynamic human–computer interaction load.

4. Testing Results

Simulation models of z-axis spider web biomimetic designs indicate a simulated weight reduction ratio of approximately 32.03%. However, errors are inevitable in actual production, so the sample handrails are processed and then weighed. Table 8 summarizes the results. This study used an electronic balance for sample weighing.
As evidenced in Table 8, PA6-CF handrails incorporating bio-inspired spider web configurations demonstrate mass reduction percentages around 26.19%, whereas PLA-based counterparts achieve approximately 28.16% weight reduction. These empirical measurements validate the significant promise of spider web biomimetic architectures for weight reduction applications. Computational simulations further reveal that PA6-CF composite handrails with such bio-structures exhibit superior mechanical characteristics. Experimental testing can obtain more data to demonstrate the practical application capability of the proposed solution. The experimental result data chart is shown below.
From Figure 13, it can be seen that, when the load is 1500 N, the actual test results are greater than the simulation results, but the curve in the figure does not show a sudden drop, which means that the handrail has not undergone structural damage. All handrail structures have qualified strength, and the overall deformation pattern is consistent with the simulation results.
Comparative analysis of structural variations in handrail systems reveals distinct deformation characteristics. The spider-web-inspired configuration demonstrates a flatter deformation curve compared to conventional designs, suggesting enhanced elastic deformation capacity. All tested specimens maintained elastic behavior without reaching yield points, as evidenced by their linear deformation curves. Therefore, this indicates that the spider web structure improves the elastic deformation ability of handrails and enhances their energy dissipation ability [30], mirroring computational modeling predictions. Such structural optimization potentially increases functional durability while maintaining ergonomic performance in practical applications.
Comparative analysis of handrail materials revealed that PA6-CF composites exhibit superior elastic deformation characteristics compared to PLA-based structural counterparts. The elastic deformation phase dominates all material responses illustrated in Figure 13. This behavior stems from PA6-CF’s enhanced toughness properties [31], which enable greater elastic strain accommodation under mechanical loading while maintaining structural integrity. The material’s balanced performance profile makes it particularly suitable for ergonomic applications requiring both safety compliance and user experience optimization.
The biomimetic spider web design implemented with PA6-CF material achieves multiple engineering objectives: substantial weight reduction in automotive handrail components, maintenance of structural strength requirements, and compliance with vehicular safety standards [32]. This innovative approach simultaneously enhances user comfort in automotive environments and embodies the modern philosophy of “technologically-driven human-centric design”.

5. Conclusions

By combining bionics and additive manufacturing technology, a lightweight design of the roof handrail has been achieved, and a new scheme for the spider web biomimetic structure roof handrail made of PA6-CF material has been proposed. The unique value of additive manufacturing in connecting the “natural logic engineering technology experience design” chain has been verified through the case of the spider web biomimetic roof handrail. Its innovation is reflected in:
First, the parametric numerical modeling of the natural spider web structure is simplified and converted into models suitable for FDM processes. The eight-angle spider web biomimetic configuration is used as a lightweight solution for the handrail system. Then, the strength and deformation distribution characteristics of the spider web structure at different scales are analyzed through the layered simulation of micro-elements and plane modules.
Through investigating the functional–aesthetic synergy of PA6-CF composite material, simulation analyses revealed that the spider-web-inspired biomimetic configuration effectively enhances stress dispersion patterns and elevates elastic deformation capacity. Leveraging these findings, three distinct arachnid-web-inspired handrail prototypes were engineered, establishing an innovative “visualized performance” interactive paradigm.
Comparative evaluation of the tripartite biomimetic configurations and novel handrail assemblies demonstrated that z-axis design optimization presents the optimal approach, effectively balancing ergonomic requirements with mechanical performance by minimizing stress concentration across diverse operational scenarios. The spider-web-inspired PA6-CF handrail fabricated using 3D printing technology demonstrates a theoretically calculated weight loss of 32.03% relative to conventional designs, with practical implementation achieving approximately 26.19% weight savings.
Through computational modeling and experimental testing comparing material performance, the PA6-CF composite demonstrated superior characteristics over PLA substrates. Findings from both simulation and physical testing indicated that PA6-CF handrails exhibit enhanced elastic deformation capacity under equivalent loading conditions compared to PLA basic alternatives, fulfilling critical safety standards and impact absorption requirements while simultaneously improving ergonomic performance.
This study verified the application potential of spider web bionic structure combined with additive manufacturing in the lightweight design of automotive roof handles. Based on the current research results, the follow-up work is planned as follows: Conduct fatigue tests and mechanical simulations under alternating load, impact load and extreme temperature conditions to evaluate the long-term service performance and environmental adaptability of the bionic structure. Apply topology optimization algorithm to further optimize the layout and size parameters of the spider web structure, so as to achieve better lightweight effect while maintaining structural safety. Optimize the fused deposition molding process and material ratio to reduce the anisotropy of 3D printed carbon-fiber-reinforced PA6 composites and improve interlayer bonding strength. Carry out ergonomics tests and subjective sensory evaluation to establish a quantitative evaluation system integrating mechanical performance, structural form and user experience. Extend the bionic design method to other automotive interior functional parts, and complete real vehicle road tests and NVH tests to promote the industrial application of the proposed design. Explore the integration of multifunctional composite materials, digital twin technology and recycled additive manufacturing, and develop intelligent and eco-friendly bionic design solutions for automotive interior components.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that they have no known competitors or any potential social interests or personal relationships that may affect the work reported in this work.

References

  1. Jung, S.; Kara, L.B.; Nie, Z.; Simpson, T.W.; Whitefoot, K.S. Is Additive Manufacturing an Environmentally and Economically Preferred Alternative for Mass Production? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 6373–6386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yang, H.; Yin, X.; Wang, S.; Yu, M. Application of AlSi10MnMg in Vehicle Body Lightweight. Automob. Technol. 2024, 49, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, M.; Li, H.; Yuan, Z.; Liang, G.; Wang, C.; Chen, H. Performance of Lightweight Bamboo Fiber-Reinforced Sandwich Composites Applied in Automotive Interior. World Bamboo Ratt. 2024, 22, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wellendorf, A.; von Damnitz, L.; Nuri, A.W.; Anders, D.; Trampnau, S. Determination of the Temperature-Dependent Resonance Behavior of Ultrasonic Transducer Using the Finite-Element Method. Vib. Eng. Technol. 2024, 12, 1277–1290. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, Y.; Guo, M. Design and Verification of Axial Flow Turbine in Aircraft Auxiliary Power End Basedon Additive Manufacture. Spec. Cast. Nonferrous Alloys 2024, 44, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, P.; Yan, Z.; Yang, Y. Progress in automobile body processing technology: Multi-material and lightweight strategies for saving energy and reducing emissions. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2024, 46, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, H.; Kong, M.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y. Application and Effect Analysis of Additive Manufacturing in Mass Production of Automotive Interior Parts. Automot. Knowl. 2024, 24, 58–60. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kartanas, L.; Bhavan, S.J. Design, Development, and Performance Evaluation of a Lightweight Short Shifter for Enhanced Gear-Shifting Quality in Automobile. J. Inst. Eng. (India) Ser. D 2023, 105, 863–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Z.; Wu, H.; Wang, P.; Li, Y. Reliability-Based Design Optimization of Additive Manufacturing for Lithium Battery Silicon Anode. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part B Mech. Eng. 2024, 10, 4065530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Plocher, J.; Panesar, A. Review on design and structural optimisation in additive manufacturing: Towards next-generation lightweight structures. Mater. Des. 2019, 183, 108164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jankovics, D.; Barari, A. Customization of Automotive Structural Components Using Additive Manufacturing and Topology Optimization. IFAC-Pap. 2019, 52, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yue, Q. Optimization Design of Seat Structure Based on Improving the Performance of Body NVH. Ph.D. Thesis, North University of China, Taiyuan, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  13. Xu, Z.H. Biomimetic concept car styling and interior and exterior decoration design based on taro morphology. Screen Print. 2023, 35, 106–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhuo, W.; Jiang, P.; Wang, C.; Guo, C. Structure and Mechanical Property of Spider’s Web and Their Adaptations. Sichuan J. Zool. 2006, 25, 898–902. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhao, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhang, R. Exploration of the optimal web building model for spider webs. Sci. Technol. Assoc. Forum 2013, 3, 86–88. [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, X.; Xu, Y.; Guo, X.; Luo, X.; Li, L.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, C. Fabrication and Properties of Spider Web Structure SiC/SiC Turbine Blisk. Cent. South Univ. 2022, 50, 2205–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, L.; Han, Z.; Zang, Y.; Han, Z.; Wang, X. Design and three-dimensional finite element analysis of 3D printed individualized titanium mesh with a bionic porous spider web-shaped structure. Chin. J. Tissue Eng. Res. 2023, 27, 4796–4801. [Google Scholar]
  18. Guo, C.; Wang, C.; Huang, Q. 3D-printed spider-web structures for highly efficient water collection. Heliyon 2022, 8, E10007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wu, Q.; Huang, T.; Sun, M.; Wang, L.; Wang, H. Optimization of Reinforcement Scheme for Old Reinforced Concrete Factory Building. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 2022, 31, 224–230. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ko, F.K.; Jovicic, J. Modeling of mechanical properties and structural design of spider web. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5, 780–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Nasim, M.S.; Yaghootian, A.; Mosalmani, R. Energy absorption of the additively manufactured novel re-entrant auxetic structure in comparison with honeycomb structure: Experimental and numerical analysis. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2023, 45, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hoffmann, K.G.; Haag, K.; Müssig, J. Biomimetic approaches towards lightweight composite structures for car interior parts. Mater. Des. 2021, 212, 110281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dong, W.; Yu, Z.; Sun, X.; Hu, Z.; Shang, E.; Tong, F.; Wang, S.; Li, X. Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polyamide 6 Composites: Impact of Fiber Type and Concentration on the Mechanical Properties. Materials 2025, 18, 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, W.; Hu, Z.; Li, X.; He, J.; Wang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, J. Additive manufacturing of high-strength polyamide 6 composites reinforced with continuous carbon fiber prepreg. Polym. Compos. 2024, 45, 668–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, W.; Li, X. Additive Manufacturing of Polylactic Acid Material and Its Application. Micronanoelectron. Technol. 2024, 61, 36–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guduru, K.K.; Gangisetti, S. Mechanical Characterization of 3D Printed Carbon Fiber Reinforced PLA Composite and Parameters Optimization. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2024, 157, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Luo, C.; Li, F.; Li, D.; Fu, Q.; Pan, C. Bioinspired Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as a Spider Silk Structure for Ultrahigh Mechanical Property. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 31256–31263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cranford, S.W.; Tarakanova, A.; Pugno, N.M.; Buehler, M.J. Nonlinear material behaviour of spider silk yields robust webs. Nature 2012, 482, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Tian, Y.; Hu, L. Preparation and Mechanical Properties of Polyamide 6/Short Carbon Fiber Composites. Eng. Plast. Appl. 2022, 50, 30–35. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hu, W. Structure Design and Simulation of Novel Sixteen-Sided Cobwed-Like Disk Resonator Gyroscope. Ph.D. Thesis, Soochow University, Suzhou, China, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, M.; Xu, Y.; Fang, J. Orthotropic mechanical properties of PLA materials fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Thin-Walled Struct. 2024, 199, 111800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xie, G.; Li, Z.; Yuan, N.; Li, R.; Li, K. Toward Effective Reliability Requirement Assurance for Automotive Functional Safety. ACM Trans. Des. Autom. Electron. Syst. (TODAES) 2018, 23, 3230620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Basic car roof handrail model; (b) spider web biomimetic structural model; (c) new design along the z-axis; (d) new design along the x-axis; (e) new design along the y-axis.
Figure 1. (a) Basic car roof handrail model; (b) spider web biomimetic structural model; (c) new design along the z-axis; (d) new design along the x-axis; (e) new design along the y-axis.
Jcs 10 00353 g001
Figure 2. (a) Traditional structural unit; (b) the cross-sectional view of the spider web structure; (c) the spider web structural unit; (d) the traditional structural plane block; (e) the spider web structural plane block.
Figure 2. (a) Traditional structural unit; (b) the cross-sectional view of the spider web structure; (c) the spider web structural unit; (d) the traditional structural plane block; (e) the spider web structural plane block.
Jcs 10 00353 g002
Figure 3. (a) PA6 traditional handrail; (b) PA6 spider web handrail; (c) PLA traditional handrail; (d) PLA spider web handrail.
Figure 3. (a) PA6 traditional handrail; (b) PA6 spider web handrail; (c) PLA traditional handrail; (d) PLA spider web handrail.
Jcs 10 00353 g003
Figure 4. (a) Fixture schematic diagram; (b) fixture assembly diagram; (c) experimental diagram.
Figure 4. (a) Fixture schematic diagram; (b) fixture assembly diagram; (c) experimental diagram.
Jcs 10 00353 g004
Figure 5. Simulation results of total deformation and equivalent stress of the unit structure ((a,b) are traditional structural units; (c,d) are spider web structural units).
Figure 5. Simulation results of total deformation and equivalent stress of the unit structure ((a,b) are traditional structural units; (c,d) are spider web structural units).
Jcs 10 00353 g005
Figure 6. Simulation results of total deformation and equivalent stress of planes with different structures ((a,b) are traditional structural unit plane blocks; (c,d) are spider web structural unit plane blocks).
Figure 6. Simulation results of total deformation and equivalent stress of planes with different structures ((a,b) are traditional structural unit plane blocks; (c,d) are spider web structural unit plane blocks).
Jcs 10 00353 g006
Figure 7. Simulation total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram of traditional roof handrail under 1500 N load. ((a) is total deformation diagram; (b) is equivalent stress diagram).
Figure 7. Simulation total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram of traditional roof handrail under 1500 N load. ((a) is total deformation diagram; (b) is equivalent stress diagram).
Jcs 10 00353 g007
Figure 8. The total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram of 1500 N spider web structure handrail in the x-axis direction. ((a) is total deformation diagram; (b) is equivalent stress diagram).
Figure 8. The total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram of 1500 N spider web structure handrail in the x-axis direction. ((a) is total deformation diagram; (b) is equivalent stress diagram).
Jcs 10 00353 g008
Figure 9. The total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram of the 1500 N spider web structure handrail in the y-axis direction. ((a) is total deformation diagram; (b) is equivalent stress diagram).
Figure 9. The total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram of the 1500 N spider web structure handrail in the y-axis direction. ((a) is total deformation diagram; (b) is equivalent stress diagram).
Jcs 10 00353 g009
Figure 10. The total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram of the 1500 N spider web structure handrail in the z-axis direction. ((a) is total deformation diagram; (b) is equivalent stress diagram).
Figure 10. The total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram of the 1500 N spider web structure handrail in the z-axis direction. ((a) is total deformation diagram; (b) is equivalent stress diagram).
Jcs 10 00353 g010
Figure 11. Total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram of PLA basic traditional handrail at 1500 N. ((a) is total deformation diagram; (b) is equivalent stress diagram).
Figure 11. Total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram of PLA basic traditional handrail at 1500 N. ((a) is total deformation diagram; (b) is equivalent stress diagram).
Jcs 10 00353 g011
Figure 12. Total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram of PLA basic z-axis design at 1500 N. ((a) is total deformation diagram; (b) is equivalent stress diagram).
Figure 12. Total deformation diagram and equivalent stress diagram of PLA basic z-axis design at 1500 N. ((a) is total deformation diagram; (b) is equivalent stress diagram).
Jcs 10 00353 g012
Figure 13. Load and jaw spacing results of traditional and spider web handrails with different materials in tensile tests.
Figure 13. Load and jaw spacing results of traditional and spider web handrails with different materials in tensile tests.
Jcs 10 00353 g013
Table 1. Volume of handrails for three design schemes and traditional scheme.
Table 1. Volume of handrails for three design schemes and traditional scheme.
Structural Distribution DirectionVolume (cm3)
X-axis direction89.72
Y-axis direction94.00
Z-axis direction90.92
Traditional handrails133.78
Table 2. Main mechanical properties of PLA Basic [24,25].
Table 2. Main mechanical properties of PLA Basic [24,25].
DataPLA BasicPA6-CF
Density (g/cm3)1.24–1.261.17
Tensile strength (MPa)50–65210–240
Young’s modulus (GPa)3.2–3.818–22
Poisson’s ratio0.350.30
Flexural strength (MPa)80–95280–320
Flexural modulus (GPa)3.5–4.220–25
Table 3. Specific data of printing parameters for PA6 and PLA materials.
Table 3. Specific data of printing parameters for PA6 and PLA materials.
PLA BasicPA6-CF
Printing layer height (mm)0.20.2
First layer velocity (m/s)5050
Other layer velocities (m/s)7070
Printing temperature (°C)220260
Hot bed temperature (°C)50100
Printing material diameter (mm)1.751.75
Table 4. Static simulation results of traditional handrails.
Table 4. Static simulation results of traditional handrails.
Load (N)Maximum Equivalent Stress (MPa)Maximum Total Deformation (μm)
50050.5280
1000100.8558
1500151.1836
Table 5. Maximum equivalent stress and maximum total deformation of handrails in three design directions and traditional handrails under a load of 500 N.
Table 5. Maximum equivalent stress and maximum total deformation of handrails in three design directions and traditional handrails under a load of 500 N.
TypesMaximum Equivalent Stress (MPa)Maximum Total Deformation (μm)
X-axis136.71010
Y-axis77.8606
Z-axis63.1470
Traditional50.5280
Table 6. Maximum equivalent stress and maximum total deformation of handrails under 1000 N and 1500 N loads.
Table 6. Maximum equivalent stress and maximum total deformation of handrails under 1000 N and 1500 N loads.
Load (N)TypesMaximum Equivalent Stress (MPa)Maximum Total Deformation (μm)
1000X-axis273.32015
Y-axis155.51210
Z-axis126.1938
Traditional100.8558
1500X-axis409.93021
Y-axis233.11814
Z-axis189.11406
Traditional151.1836
Table 7. Maximum equivalent stress and maximum total deformation of handrails under different loads for different materials.
Table 7. Maximum equivalent stress and maximum total deformation of handrails under different loads for different materials.
TypesMaterialsLoad (N)Maximum Equivalent Stress (MPa)Maximum Total Deformation (μm)
TraditionalPA6-CF50050.5280
1000100.8558
1500151.1836
PLA Basic50014.462
100028.8183
150043.2275
Spider web structurePA6-CF50063.1470
1000126.1938
1500189.11406
PLA Basic50012.8209
100025.6417
150038.5626
Table 8. Weight of traditional handrails and spider web structured handrails under different materials.
Table 8. Weight of traditional handrails and spider web structured handrails under different materials.
PA6 Traditional PA6 Spider Web PLA Traditional PLA Spider Web
Actual weight (g)141.0104.0168.4121.0
Simulated weight (g)156.5106.4165.8112.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, X. Bio-Inspired Functional Freedom: Additive Manufacturing Enables Roof Handle Design. J. Compos. Sci. 2026, 10, 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10070353

AMA Style

Guo X. Bio-Inspired Functional Freedom: Additive Manufacturing Enables Roof Handle Design. Journal of Composites Science. 2026; 10(7):353. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10070353

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Xueping. 2026. "Bio-Inspired Functional Freedom: Additive Manufacturing Enables Roof Handle Design" Journal of Composites Science 10, no. 7: 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10070353

APA Style

Guo, X. (2026). Bio-Inspired Functional Freedom: Additive Manufacturing Enables Roof Handle Design. Journal of Composites Science, 10(7), 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10070353

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop