A Study on an Improved Fatigue Life Prediction Method for Type IV Cylinders
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Test Materials and Equipment
2.2. Test Methods and Conditions
2.3. Test Results
2.3.1. Fatigue Performance of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP)
2.3.2. Fatigue Performance of the Liner Material (PA6)
2.3.3. CFRP Failure Mode Analysis
3. Simulation Model Construction
3.1. Framework of the Fatigue Life Prediction Method
3.2. Finite Element Static Model
- Material-level validation. For the PA6 material, an FEM model of the standardized tensile coupon (ISO 527-2 Type 1A) was built using the elastic–plastic bilinear constitutive model. The simulated stress–strain curve showed good agreement with the experimental data across the elastic region, yield transition, and plastic plateau, confirming that the extracted parameters ( = 1010.635 MPa, = 30.187 MPa) are consistent with the constitutive model used in the cylinder FEM. For the CFRP overwrap, the nine orthotropic elastic constants were directly adopted from standardized tensile tests (ASTM D3039/D3039M-17) and used as the input of a linear-elastic constitutive model, where the fatigue behavior is handled through the ply fatigue algorithm on top of the linear-elastic stress field.
- Structural-level validation. The cylinder FEM was validated against the experimentally measured burst pressure of 181 MPa. The CFRP tensile strength exhibits a 95% confidence interval of [2142, 2811] MPa. The lower bound of the predicted burst pressure corresponds to the internal pressure at which the maximum principal stress in the fiber layer first reaches 2142 MPa, and the upper bound corresponds to the pressure at which it first reaches 2811 MPa. Two pressure levels were evaluated: at 175 MPa, the peak fiber stress reached 2229.708 MPa (exceeding the lower bound), indicating that the minimum predicted burst pressure is below 175 MPa; at 234 MPa, the peak fiber stress reached 3808.129 MPa at the dome/polar boss interface (exceeding the upper bound), indicating that the maximum predicted burst pressure is 234 MPa. The predicted burst range of [175, 234) MPa encloses the experimental value of 181 MPa, providing a direct verification of the cylinder-level load-bearing capacity.
3.3. nCode Fatigue Analysis Model
3.4. Full-Scale Cylinder Fatigue Test Validation Model
4. Analysis and Discussion
4.1. Simulation Stress Analysis and Life Prediction Results
4.2. Comparison and Validation with Full-Scale Test Results
4.3. Parameter Influence and Sensitivity Analysis
4.4. Method Discussion and Limitations
5. Conclusions
- A comprehensive S-N curve database was established through tension–tension fatigue tests on CFRP at various ply angles (0°, ±15°, ±30°, ±45°) and temperatures (−30 °C, 25 °C, 82 °C). The results reveal that the ply angle is the predominant factor governing the fatigue performance of CFRP, while temperature significantly influences the behavior of the PA6 liner material. Analysis of failure modes indicates a transition in the dominant damage mechanism from fiber fracture to matrix- and interface-driven damage accumulation as the ply angle increases.
- A simulation-based method for predicting the fatigue life of Type IV cylinders was developed. Its core innovation is the integration of a multi-angle anisotropic fatigue algorithm for the fiber layers. Implemented within the Abaqus and nCode software environment, this method enables accurate characterization of the anisotropic fatigue behavior of CFRP, overcoming the limitation of oversimplified angle treatment inherent in traditional approaches.
- Validation against full-scale Type IV cylinder fatigue tests demonstrated the method’s effectiveness. The location of the minimum predicted fatigue life correlated well with the experimentally observed failure sites. The prediction error was below 35.3%, which represents a significant improvement in accuracy over conventional simplified methods.
- Parameter studies confirmed that the fiber ply angle is the key parameter controlling CFRP layer fatigue. Furthermore, the simulation model successfully captured the important trend that reducing the operational pressure substantially extends the fatigue life.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhang, X.; Guo, L.; Wei, X.; Liu, Q.; Liang, Y.; Wang, J.; Peng, W. High-Performance Hydrogen Detection of Nanoarrays Based on Plasmonic Enhancement Mechanism. Sci. Rep. 2025, 16, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, J.; Li, Y.; Cao, W.; Li, Y.; Gao, Z. Failure Analysis of Novel BOSS Structures for Type IV Hydrogen Storage Vessels. Energies 2023, 16, 4005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, C.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Bin, G.; Zhou, C.; Han, W.; Li, X. Hydrogen Permeability of Polyamide 6 Used as Liner Material for Type IV On-Board Hydrogen Storage Cylinders. Polymers 2023, 15, 3715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Q.; Zu, L.; Wang, P.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, G.; Chen, S.; Fu, J.; Zhou, L.; Wang, H.; et al. Design and Fabrication of Carbon-Fiber-Wound Composite Pressure Vessel with HDPE Liner. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2022, 200, 104851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farooq, S.A. A Comprehensive Review of Hydrogen Storage Pressure Vessels: Materials, Fabrication, Performance, Testing Procedures, and Modelling Approaches. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2026, 224, 154376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piraino, F.; Pagnotta, L.; Corigliano, O.; Genovese, M.; Fragiacomo, P. Advances in Type IV Tanks for Safe Hydrogen Storage: Materials, Technologies and Challenges. Hydrogen 2025, 6, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouhala, L.; Karatrantos, A.; Reinhardt, H.; Schramm, N.; Akin, B.; Rauscher, A.; Mauersberger, A.; Taşkıran, S.T.; Ulaşlı, M.E.; Aktaş, E.; et al. Advancement in the Modeling and Design of Composite Pressure Vessels for Hydrogen Storage: A Comprehensive Review. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, W.X.; Li, Y.T.; Huang, W.J.; Zhang, Y.M.; Fan, M.; Xiao, Z.M.; Li, W.G. Advances in Failure Assessment of Type IV Hydrogen Storage Vessels: A Critical Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2026, 226, 116353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, J.; Li, C.; Liu, J.; Feng, J.; Chen, Z.; Li, Y.; Wu, T.; Zhang, X. Prediction and Optimization of Failures in High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage Vessels: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2026, 226, 116236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, E.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, B.; Xu, W. Fatigue Life Prediction and Verification of High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage Vessel. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 30412–30422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, K.; Zheng, J.; Hua, Z.; Gu, C.; Zhang, R.; Liu, Y. Hydrogen Assisted Fatigue Life of Cr–Mo Steel Pressure Vessel with Coplanar Cracks Based on Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 20132–20141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.-S.; Kim, L.-H.; Park, J.-S. The Effect of Composite Damage on Fatigue Life of the High Pressure Vessel for Natural Gas Vehicles. Compos. Struct. 2011, 93, 2963–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Wang, B.; Wei, S.; Hong, Y.; Zheng, C. Prediction of Long-Term Fatigue Life of CFRP Composite Hydrogen Storage Vessel Based on Micromechanics of Failure. Compos. Part B 2016, 97, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, J.; Zhou, J.; Wu, T.; Liu, Z.; Wu, Z. Review and Assessment of Fatigue Delamination Damage of Laminated Composite Structures. Materials 2023, 16, 7677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Starkova, O.; Gagani, A.I.; Karl, C.W. Modelling of Environmental Ageing of Polymers and Polymer Composites—Durability Prediction Methods. Polymers 2022, 14, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hugaas, E.; Vedvik, N.P.; Echtermeyer, A.T. Progressive Fatigue Failure Analysis of a Filament Wound Ring Specimen with a Hole. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amjadi, M.; Fatemi, A. A Fatigue Damage Model for Life Prediction of Injection-Molded Short Glass Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites. Polymers 2021, 13, 2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, Q.; Zhou, G.; Tang, H.; Meng, Z.; Jain, M.; Su, X.; Han, W. In-Situ Effect in Cross-Ply Laminates under Various Loading Conditions Analyzed with Hybrid Macro/Micro-Scale Computational Models. Compos. Struct. 2021, 261, 113592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xue, R.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Luo, Y. Stress Distribution Characteristics and Intelligent Online Monitoring Methods for Multilayer Wound Pressure Vessel. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2026, 221, 105742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popiela, B.; Günzel, S.; Schukar, M.; Mair, G.W.; Krebber, K.; Seidlitz, H. Impact of Internal Pressure Control during Manufacturing on Residual Stresses and Safety Performance of Type 4 Pressure Vessels. Compos. Part C Open Access 2025, 17, 100581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Böhm, M.; Kluger, K.; Pochwała, S.; Kupina, M. Application of the S-N Curve Mean Stress Correction Model in Terms of Fatigue Life Estimation for Random Torsional Loading for Selected Aluminum Alloys. Materials 2020, 13, 2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jois, K.C.; Welsh, M.; Gries, T.; Sackmann, J. Numerical Analysis of Filament Wound Cylindrical Composite Pressure Vessels Accounting for Variable Dome Contour. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 19881; Gaseous Hydrogen-Land Vehicle Fuel Containers. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025.
- SAE J2579; Standard for Fuel Systems in Fuel Cell and Other Hydrogen Vehicles. SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2018.
- Qi, L.; Wang, K.; He, Y.; Gong, B.; Cao, Z.; Hu, P.; Shi, J. Effect of Service Temperatures on the Interfacial Bonding Properties of PA11–CFRP in Type IV High–Pressure Hydrogen Storage Cylinders with Different Surface Treatments. Compos. Part A 2026, 202, 109537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.-E.; Shang, D.-G.; Zuo, L.-X.; Qu, L.-F.; Cai, D.; Jin, T.; Li, D.-H. Fatigue Life Prediction Considering Strength Contribution of Fibre Layers with Different Orientations for CFRP Laminates at High Temperature. Compos. Struct. 2023, 306, 116604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Kang, G.; Chen, K.; Kan, Q.; Liu, Y. Experimental Study on Rate-Dependent Uniaxial Whole-Life Ratchetting and Fatigue Behavior of Polyamide 6. Int. J. Fatigue 2020, 132, 105402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Kang, G.; Chen, K.; Kan, Q. Experimental Study on Uniaxial Ratchetting-Fatigue Interaction of Polyamide-6. Polym. Test. 2018, 69, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Premanand, A.; Balle, F. Significance of Fracture Fatigue Entropy in Predicting Fatigue Life across Regimes in Polymer Matrix Composites: A Review and Analysis. Compos. Part B 2026, 314, 113489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Premanand, A.; Sharma, G.; Balle, F. A Straightforward Machine Learning-Based Giga-Cycle Fatigue Life Regression Approach for Polymer Matrix Composites. Results Eng. 2025, 28, 108037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montes de Oca Valle, E.; Spearing, M.; Sinclair, I.; Allen, T.; Hepples, W. Model-Experiment Comparison for Transverse Loading of Metal–Composite Ring Specimen (Part 1). Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2023, 205, 104964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabzy, P.; Fakoor, M.; Mohammadi, B. Entropy-Based Modeling of Fatigue in Angle-Ply and Quasi-Isotropic Composite Laminates. Int. J. Fatigue 2026, 208, 109579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, M.; Scheffler, S.; Anilkumar, P.M.; Rolffs, C.; Rolfes, R. An Efficient Numerical Model to Predict Fatigue Damage Behavior of Carbon Composites Accounting for Variations in Ply Thickness. Mater. Des. 2026, 265, 115860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Gu, J.; Pan, S.; Yang, W.; Li, Z.; Ruan, S.; Shen, C. Numerical Study on the Influence of Liner Geometry and Lay-up Sequence on the Fatigue Life of Composite Hydrogen Storage Vessel. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2023, 205, 104986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, W.; Meng, Q. Fatigue Life Prediction of Composite Materials Based on Improved Residual Strength Model. J. Shenyang Aerosp. Univ. 2024, 41, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nouri, M.; Ghasemi, F.A.; Sherbaf, G.R.; Kashyzadeh, K.R. Fatigue Analysis of a Type-IV CNG Composite Cylinder with Variable Wall-Thickness and Polyethylene Liner. Mech. Compos. Mater. 2023, 59, 927–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, K.-K.; Ha, S.-K.; Kim, J.-H.; Han, H.-H.; Kim, S.-J. Life Prediction of Composite Pressure Vessels Using Multi-Scale Approach. J. Korea Acad. Indust. Coop. Soc. 2010, 11, 3176–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, W.; Wang, J.; Pan, Z.; Liu, J.; Ma, L.; Zhou, J.; Su, Y. Review on Optimization Design, Failure Analysis and Non-Destructive Testing of Composite Hydrogen Storage Vessel. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 38862–38883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koutsawa, Y.; Bouhala, L. Uncertainty analysis in the design of type-IV composite pressure vessels for hydrogen storage. Compos. Part C Open Access 2025, 16, 100544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASTM D792-20; Standard Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of Plastics by Displacement. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2020.
- ASTM D3171-22; Standard Test Methods for Constituent Content of Composite Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2022.
- Bilisik, K.; Erdogan, G.; Sapancı, E. Flexural Behavior of 3D Para-Aramid/Phenolic/Nano (MWCNT) Composites. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 7213–7224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Risteska, S.; Srebrenkoska, V.; Zhezhova, S.; Srebrenkoska, S.; Risteski, S.; Jordeva, S.; Longurova, S.G. The Effect of Textile Structure Reinforcement on Polymer Composite Material Mechanical Behavior. Polymers 2024, 16, 3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yao, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhan, A.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W. Measurement Methods for Fiber Volume Fraction of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites. Polymers 2026, 18, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- ASTM D3039/D3039M-17; Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2025.
- ISO 527-2; Plastics-Determination of Tensile Properties—Part 2: Test Conditions for Moulding and Extrusion Plastics. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025.
- Voudouris, G.; Di Maio, D.; Sever, I.A. Experimental Fatigue Behaviour of CFRP Composites under Vibration and Thermal Loading. Int. J. Fatigue 2020, 140, 105791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Xiao, M.; Ding, J.; Zhu, H.; Chen, Y. Fatigue Characterization Study of CFRP under Hygrothermal Environment Based on Continuum Damage Mechanics Model. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 2020, 43, 2943–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 13003; Fibre-Reinforced Plastics-Determination of Fatigue Properties under Cyclic Loading Conditions. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.
- Hülsbusch, D.; Kohl, A.; Striemann, P.; Niedermeier, M.; Strauch, J.; Walther, F. Development of an Energy-Based Approach for Optimized Frequency Selection for Fatigue Testing on Polymers—Exemplified on Polyamide 6. Polym. Test. 2020, 81, 106260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Kang, G.; Kan, Q. Rate-Dependent Multiaxial Life Prediction for Polyamide-6 Considering Ratchetting: Semi-Empirical and Physics-Informed Machine Learning Models. Int. J. Fatigue 2022, 163, 107086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; Dang, M.; Jiang, L. Fatigue Behavior and Failure Mechanisms of 3D Angle-Interlock Woven Composite at Room and Cryogenic Temperatures under Bending. Compos. Commun. 2021, 23, 100559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelika, A.; Marek, R. Effect of Elevated Temperature on Load-Bearing Capacity and Fatigue Life of Bolted Joints in CFRP Components. Polymers 2026, 18, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Segnidi, H.; Wahid, A.; Kartouni, A.; Elghorba, M. Characterization of Residual Interlaminar Shear Strength and Fatigue Damage Accumulation in Laminated Composites Monitored by Acoustic Emission: Experimental and Theoretical Approaches. Compos. Commun. 2025, 56, 102361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubit, A.; Debnath, K.; Slota, J.; Dominik, F.; Dubey, A.D.; Rao, G.S.; Żaba, K. Analysis of the Influence of Manufacturing Technology on Selected Static, Fatigue and Morphological Properties of CFRP Composites. Materials 2025, 18, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grubbs, F.E. Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples. Technometrics 1969, 11, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmadi Jebeli, M.; Heidari-Rarani, M. Development of Abaqus WCM Plugin for Progressive Failure Analysis of Type IV Composite Pressure Vessels Based on Puck Failure Criterion. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2022, 131, 105851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regassa, Y.; Gari, J.; Lemu, H.G. Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessel Design Optimization Using Numerical Method. J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouhala, L.; Perbal, S. AI in Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessels: A Review and Advanced Roadmap from Materials Design to Predictive Maintenance. J. Compos. Sci. 2026, 10, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, F.; Chen, Z.; Wang, H.; Xiao, H.; Jin, Y. Modeling Theory of the FEM Model and Hydrostatic Burst Test for a Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessel. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2026, 215, 153876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sajith, S.; Murthy, K.S.R.K.; Robi, P.S. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Mixed Mode Fatigue Crack Growth Models in Aluminum 6061-T6. Int. J. Fatigue 2020, 130, 105285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Ply Angle | Fitting Parameters a | Fitting Parameters b | Correlation Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0° | 773.36 | −0.06378 | 0.72 |
| ±15° | 141.56 | −0.06975 | 0.80 |
| ±30° | 86.71 | −0.10071 | 0.88 |
| ±45° | 20.72 | −0.08229 | 0.81 |
| Environmental Temperature | Fitting Parameters A | Fitting Parameters B | Fitting Parameters C | Correlation Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −30 °C | 20.07 | 6.83 × 10−10 | −0.01181 | 0.82 |
| Room temp | 12.75 | 9.51 × 10−5 | −0.02118 | 0.78 |
| 82 °C | 5.56 | 2.47 × 10−4 | −0.04553 | 0.73 |
| Component | Materials | Parameter | Sample | Unit | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber layer | T700/Epoxy CFRP | 1-direction tensile modulus | E1 | MPa | 151,500 |
| 2-direction tensile modulus | E2 | MPa | 8830 | ||
| 3-direction tensile modulus | E3 | MPa | 8830 | ||
| 12-direction Poisson’s ratio | υ12 | 0.307 | |||
| 13-direction Poisson’s ratio | υ13 | 0.307 | |||
| 23-direction Poisson’s ratio | υ23 | 0.45 | |||
| 12-direction shear modulus | G12 | MPa | 5070 | ||
| 13-direction shear modulus | G13 | MPa | 5070 | ||
| 23-direction shear modulus | G23 | MPa | 3050 | ||
| Liner | PA6 | Tensile modulus | E | MPa | 1010.635 |
| Poisson’s ratio | υ | 0.4 | |||
| Yield strength | Rp0.2 | MPa | 30.187 | ||
| Elongation | εf | % | 108.1 | ||
| Boss | Al6061-T6 [61] | Tensile modulus | E | MPa | 68,000 |
| Poisson’s ratio | υ | 0.33 | |||
| Yield strength | Rp0.2 | MPa | 270 | ||
| Elongation | εf | % | 14.8 |
| Cylinder Number | Condition/MPa | Experimental Results | Simulation Results | Relative Error/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Cycles | Failure Location | Number of Cycles | Failure Location | |||
| vessel-1 | 2~87.5 | 21,859 | Dome | 24,699 | Near equator of dome | 11.5 |
| vessel-2 | 2~70 | 64,572 | No failure | 420,512 | Cylinder barrel | - |
| vessel-3 | 2~87.5 | 22,793 | Dome | 16,850 | Near equator of dome | 35.3 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Lu, J.; Zheng, C. A Study on an Improved Fatigue Life Prediction Method for Type IV Cylinders. J. Compos. Sci. 2026, 10, 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10060329
Lu J, Zheng C. A Study on an Improved Fatigue Life Prediction Method for Type IV Cylinders. Journal of Composites Science. 2026; 10(6):329. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10060329
Chicago/Turabian StyleLu, Jinjie, and Chuanxiang Zheng. 2026. "A Study on an Improved Fatigue Life Prediction Method for Type IV Cylinders" Journal of Composites Science 10, no. 6: 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10060329
APA StyleLu, J., & Zheng, C. (2026). A Study on an Improved Fatigue Life Prediction Method for Type IV Cylinders. Journal of Composites Science, 10(6), 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10060329

