Next Article in Journal
ZNR/PVTF Composite Films with Photoelectric and Piezoelectric Responses for Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Unified Multiscale and Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Wear-Regime Transitions in MWCNT and Nanoclay-Reinforced Sustainable Bio-Based Epoxy Composites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Correlation Between the Morphological Characteristics by Atomic Force Microscopy and the Biological Properties of Bioactive Zirconia/Polyethylene Glycol (ZrO2/PEG) Hybrids

by
Antonio D’Angelo
1,
Marika Fiorentino
2,
Marialuigia Raimondo
1,*,
Raffaele Longo
1,
Luigi Vertuccio
2 and
Michelina Catauro
2
1
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
2
Department of Engineering, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Roma, 29, 81031 Aversa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2026, 10(4), 187; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10040187
Submission received: 25 February 2026 / Revised: 22 March 2026 / Accepted: 27 March 2026 / Published: 29 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Biocomposites)

Abstract

Zirconia-based hybrid blends at various molecular or nanometer scales have attracted significant interest from a technological perspective. In particular, several inorganic-organic hybrids are being applied in the biomedical field. In this context, inorganic ZrO2 and hybrids composed of ZrO2, and polyethylene glycol (PEG) have been synthesized through the sol–gel process and characterized from both morphological and spectroscopic viewpoints to explore their potential as hybrid biomaterials. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) has enabled a quantitative assessment of the surface roughness of bioactive sol–gel-based materials. The findings indicated an increase in material porosity in relation to the amount of PEG present in the systems, underscoring the important role of PEG in influencing the morphological characteristics of zirconia-based blends. AFM images display the typical globular structure of PEG spread across the surface of all systems. All hybrid systems seem to be uniform, and no phase separation is evident, thereby validating that the produced materials are hybrid nanostructured ones. The simultaneous presence of both inorganic and organic phases was verified using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). FT-IR deconvolution in 850–550 cm−1 region showed that PEG progressively perturbs the Zr–O–Zr network, increasing disorder and establishing more flexible inorganic domains at high PEG content. Increasing polymer amount enhanced cell viability against NIH-3T3 cell line, while antibacterial activity decreased, with pure ZrO2 showing the strongest inhibition against Escherichia coli (E. coli).

1. Introduction

The biological performance of the ZrO2/PEG hybrids is strongly governed by the amount of polyethylene glycol (PEG) incorporated into the inorganic matrix, as it affects the surface morphology, hydrophilicity, and potential for forming calcium phosphate layers. Higher PEG content reduces surface cracks and enhances biocompatibility, with optimized ratios leading to improved cell proliferation and mechanical strength for biomedical applications [1,2,3]. Regarding structure and composition, ZrO2/PEG hybrids are typically prepared via the sol–gel method, where hydrogen bonds form between Zr-OH groups and the PEG polymer chains, often resulting in amorphous, nanostructured, and bioactive materials. The process involves the hydrolysis and condensation of zirconium alkoxides in the presence of PEG, with hydrogen bonding occurring between Zr-OH and ether oxygen atoms in the polymer. These hybrid materials, suitable for biomedical applications, often exhibit enhanced flexibility, strength, and controllable drug release profiles [1,4,5]. Cell viability assays using NIH-3T3 fibroblasts show a clear enhancement in biocompatibility with increasing PEG content [1]. PEG-rich hybrids materials are highly regarded in tissue engineering and biomedical applications due to their unique surface and bulk properties, which create a more hydrophilic, flexible, and less rigid surface environment, which supports cell adhesion and proliferation [6]. The disruption of the Zr–O–Zr network by PEG reduces the density of exposed inorganic sites that can otherwise induce stress or cytotoxic responses, resulting in improved fibroblast viability at higher polymer loadings [7].
In contrast, antibacterial tests against E. coli reveal an opposite trend. Pure ZrO2 exhibits the strongest antibacterial activity, likely due to its rigid, highly connected inorganic surface and the presence of active zirconia sites capable of interacting with bacterial membranes [8,9,10,11,12]. As PEG content increases, the antibacterial effect progressively diminishes. The polymer forms a more hydrated and compliant surface layer that partially shields the inorganic domains, reducing direct contact between bacteria and the active ZrO2 surface. Additionally, the increased surface roughness of PEG-rich regions and the reduced availability of reactive inorganic sites contribute to the lower antibacterial efficiency. More specifically, a surface that is too rough (high PEG roughness) and lacks exposed reactive inorganic components creates a “non-active” environment that is more conducive to bacterial colonization [13,14,15].
Overall, PEG incorporation enhances mammalian cell compatibility while attenuating antibacterial activity, highlighting a tunable balance between cytocompatibility and antimicrobial performance in ZrO2/PEG hybrid materials [16].
Microscopy methods like atomic force microscopy (AFM) are becoming essential tools for thoroughly examining morphology and structural characteristics at micro and sub-micrometric levels, to assess the temporal relationship between the physicochemical properties of biomaterials and their biological responses. AFM is not just a basic tool for analyzing surface topography; it can greatly enhance the understanding of surface and interface characteristics, thereby aiding in the optimization of biomaterials’ performance, processes, and their physical and chemical properties at the micro and nanoscale [17].
In this study, atomic force microscopy (AFM) provides a powerful means to link nanoscale surface morphology with the underlying structural modifications induced by varying PEG content in ZrO2/PEG bioactive hybrids.
In this work, atomic force microscopy (AFM) revealed that the surface morphology of the ZrO2/PEG hybrids is strongly influenced by the amount of PEG incorporated into the inorganic matrix. Pure zirconia exhibited a relatively compact and uniform topography, consistent with a highly connected Zr–O–Zr network. As PEG content increased, the surface became progressively rougher, displaying more pronounced nanoscale features and height variations. This evolution in roughness reflects the disruption of the inorganic network caused by PEG, which promotes the formation of heterogeneous organic–inorganic domains and induces uneven shrinkage during gelation and drying. The resulting topography is characterized by a combination of polymer-rich depressions and zirconia-rich protrusions, producing a more irregular and textured surface, directly captured by AFM height maps and roughness parameters. These morphological changes align with the FT-IR evidence of increased structural disorder and contribute to the enhanced hydrophilicity and improved cell compatibility observed at higher PEG loadings. By correlating these features with spectroscopic evidence of increased structural disorder, AFM highlights how PEG content governs both the physical architecture and the biological interface of the hybrids. This relationship is crucial for understanding how PEG-driven morphological softening enhances cell compatibility while simultaneously reducing antibacterial activity. The innovation of this work lies in the use of atomic force microscopy (AFM) to analyze in detail how PEG content affects the morphology and biological properties of ZrO2/PEG hybrids. This approach allows for the correlation of nanoscale structural changes with biological outcomes, thus optimizing the design of biomaterials for biomedical applications.
Surface roughness plays a central role in determining how biomaterials interact with their biological environment, influencing protein adsorption, cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, and even bacterial attachment [18]. Surface roughness is one of those deceptively simple parameters that ends up shaping almost every biological interaction a material has [19]. AFM is uniquely powerful here because it captures nanoscale features that other techniques simply average out. Because of this, the importance of AFM-based roughness evaluation in biomaterials [20] should be highlighted.
AFM roughness analysis allows researchers to detect subtle topographical variations that arise from changes in composition, processing conditions, or organic–inorganic interactions within hybrid materials. These nanoscale features often govern the initial biological response: moderately rough, hydrophilic surfaces tend to promote mammalian cell adhesion and viability, while sharper or more irregular textures can enhance bacterial colonization or trigger inflammatory reactions [21]. By quantifying parameters such as Ra, Rq, and peak-to-valley distances, AFM makes it possible to correlate structural modifications—such as polymer incorporation, network disruption, or phase separation—with functional biological outcomes [22].
In the context of hybrid systems, AFM becomes especially valuable [23]. In this regard, for the ZrO2/PEG hybrid materials analyzed in this study, AFM reveals how PEG content alters the inorganic network, modifies surface texture, and ultimately tunes the balance between cytocompatibility and antibacterial performance. This nanoscale insight is essential for designing biomaterials with targeted biological behavior, ensuring that structural engineering at the molecular level translates into predictable and desirable interactions at the cellular level [24].
In this work, the correlation between hydrophilicity and surface roughness of ZrO2/PEG hybrids is positive; increasing surface roughness, due to the addition of PEG, improves the hydrophilicity of the material. This increased hydrophilicity promotes cell adhesion and migration, thus contributing to better biocompatibility. In short, a rougher and more hydrophilic surface facilitates more effective cellular interactions.
The goal of this work is to articulate structure-property relationships for a study of biomaterials, namely zirconia-based hybrid blends, by trying to link the appearance of the material on a molecular scale to its biological or functional behavior. A clear structure–property link emerges when you look at the AFM roughness data together with the FT-IR evidence of network disruption. The correlation can be explained through how PEG interferes with the inorganic condensation process and how that translates into nanoscale topography. As for structure-property relationships, deconvolution of the 850–550 cm−1 FT-IR region shows that increasing PEG content progressively perturbs the Zr–O–Zr network. This manifests as: greater band broadening (indicative of disorder), reduced connectivity of the inorganic framework, formation of more flexible and less cross-linked zirconia domains. The structural interpretation may be that the PEG chains interfere with Zr–O–Zr bridging, loosening the inorganic network and increasing local mobility, namely the PEG chains migrate and reorganize during solvent removal. This dynamic rearrangement increases surface undulations. Regarding the overall structure–property relationship, it can be stated that increasing PEG disrupts the Zr–O–Zr network, producing a more flexible, hydrophilic, and biologically friendly material. However, this same structural softening reduces the antibacterial potency associated with the rigid, highly connected zirconia framework. The strength of this work is the clear correlation between the morphological changes at the nanoscale, observed by AFM, and the biological properties of ZrO2/PEG hybrids. Increased surface roughness and hydrophilicity, due to the incorporation of PEG, are directly linked to improved cellular compatibility, while disruption of the Zr–O–Zr network negatively impacts antibacterial activity. This structure-property relationship provides an important basis for designing biomaterials with desired biological behaviors. To our knowledge, there is no article in the literature that establishes such a detailed correlation between morphological changes observed by AFM and specific biological properties of ZrO2/PEG hybrids.
In summary, in this research work, we analyze how polyethylene glycol (PEG) content affects the morphological characteristics and biological properties of zirconia/polyethylene glycol (ZrO2/PEG) hybrids. The aim is to correlate nanoscale structural changes with biological outcomes, thus optimizing the design of biomaterials for biomedical applications. Specifically, the aim is to understand how surface roughness and biocompatibility can be improved to promote positive interactions with the biological environment. This study was undertaken to address the growing need to develop biomaterials that can improve interaction with biological tissues, particularly in the field of biomedical applications. Zirconia (ZrO2) is known for its bioactivity, but its integration with polyethylene glycol (PEG) could further optimize its properties, such as biocompatibility and the ability to promote cell adhesion. Understanding how variations in PEG content influence the morphology and biological properties of hybrids is crucial for designing more effective materials for use in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. Furthermore, a thorough presentation of the data and methodologies used supports the validity of the conclusions and offers a useful reference for future research in the field of biomaterials.
It is worth noting that this study addresses the gap in understanding the interactions between the morphological characteristics and biological properties of zirconia/polyethylene glycol (ZrO2/PEG) hybrids. Although previous research on zirconia-based materials exists, a thorough analysis of how variations in PEG composition influence the structure and biocompatibility of these hybrids is lacking. This study aims to address this gap by providing quantitative and qualitative data linking nanoscale morphology with biological performance, thus contributing to improved biomaterial design.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Zirconium (IV) propoxide solution (Zr(OCH2CH2CH3)4, 70 wt% in 1-propanol, Sigma-Aldrich Merck Life Science S.r.l., Milan, Italy) was employed as the precursor for the sol–gel synthesis, while ethanol (EtOH, CH3CH2OH, ≥99.8% purity, Sigma-Aldrich Merck Life Science S.r.l., Milan, Italy) served as the co-solvent. Acetylacetone (AcAc, CH3COCH2COCH3, ReagentPlus, ≥99%) was used as a chelating agent to control the hydrolysis rate. Polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400, average Mv = 400 Da) was purchased to Sigma-Aldrich Merck Life Science S.r.l., Milan, Italy was incorporated as the organic phase in the hybrid materials. Potassium bromide (KBr, for spectroscopy IR grade, ACROS ORGANICS) was used for FT-IR measurements. Bacterial strains and their agar-based growth media were obtained from Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. The Sol–Gel Synthesis

ZrO2/PEG hybrid materials (containing 0, 6, 12, 24, 50, 60, and 70 wt% of PEG) were prepared through a sol–gel route. Zirconium (IV) propoxide was firstly dissolved into ethanol, water, and AcAc solution (SolA) in a molar ratio of Zr(OC3H7)4:H2O:AcAc = 1:1:4.5. In this work, the ZrO2/PEG hybrid material containing 0 wt% of PEG was named as ZrO2. PEG, pre-dissolved in ethanol (SolB), was incorporated into the reaction mixture under vigorous stirring to obtain a homogenous solution (SolA + SolB) at the desired PEG content (0–70 wt% with respect to the total hybrid mass). Further information on the PEG amount used for the sol–gel synthesis is reported in Table S1.
Each PEG composition was prepared as an independent synthesis batch. For each composition, a freshly prepared zirconium precursor solution (Sol A) was obtained above. After gelation, the resulting wet gels were air-dried at 45 °C for 48 h to remove residual solvent. A schematic representation of the synthesis procedure is reported in Figure 1.

2.2.2. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis was conducted using a BrukerNanoScopeV multimodeAFM (Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) device to measure the surface roughness characteristics and examine the nanoscale surface structure of sol–gel derived materials. AFM is utilized to analyze both the surface structure and the morphological arrangement of polymer materials [25]. This work discusses three types of AFM images: height, amplitude error, and phase, which together give important details about a sample’s surface. The height image, or topography image, is the most crucial and commonly used. It shows the vertical changes in the AFM tip as it scans across the surface, revealing surface roughness and features like grains, pits or protrusions. The amplitude error image shows the difference between the desired and actual oscillation of the cantilever, highlighting edges and fine details less visible in the height image. The phase image indicates the phase lag between the driver and actual oscillations, providing information on material properties like stiffness and adhesion. It helps to differentiate parts in composite materials based on their responses to the tip’s oscillation. When examining a polymer blend, these images together offer a complete view of the sample’s structure, mechanical behavior, and material composition.
Topographic height images, along with amplitude error and phase images, were obtained at room temperature and analyzed using Bruker software Nanoscope Analysis 1.80 (BuildR1.126200, Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). The AFM measurements were done in tapping mode, where a pointed tip on a cantilever oscillates and occasionally contacts the sample surface. Variations in amplitude or phase during scanning create topography. A laser beam reflects off the cantilever to measure deflection. The tip’s height is adjusted for consistent force, with lateral resolution typically a few nm and vertical resolution a few Å. In this study, the tip is defined by a radius of 5−10 nm, a standard spring constant of 20−100 N/m, and resonance frequencies ranging from 200 to 400 kHz. Due to the intermittent and non-continuous contact, this working method minimizes damage to the sample’s tip or surface and is especially ideal for examining soft materials like organic or biological substances. For each sample examined, multiple AFM images were captured at various locations to assess the variation in the roughness parameters and confirm their reproducibility across different scanned regions of the samples. The scanning frequency was 0.500 Hz for each scan line, containing 512 pixels per line. To assess the roughness of the surface, various roughness parameters are typically calculated and utilized. In this study, to determine the quantitative roughness, two significant height parameters, specifically the roughness average (Ra) and the root mean square roughness (Rq), have been taken into account. Specifically, Ra indicates the arithmetic average of the absolute values of the surface profile’s height, while Rq is comparable to the roughness average (Ra); however, Rq responds more acutely to peaks and valleys than Ra, as a result of the amplitude being squared in its calculation. These amplitude parameters, which define the surface by the vertical variations in the roughness map from the average surface, are widely utilized in the literature [26,27,28]. For each of the samples, the Ra and Rq parameters were assessed, based on Equations (1) and (2):
R a = 1 l r 0 l r | z ( x ) | d x
R q = 1 l r 0 l r z ( x ) 2 d x
where lr represents the line’s length, z denotes the height, and x indicates the position.

2.2.3. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)

FT-IR spectroscopy was employed to explore the interactions occurring in the ZrO2/PEG hybrids. The analyses were performed using a Prestige 21 spectrometer (Shimadzu, Milan, Italy). Spectral acquisition covered the 400–4000 cm−1 range, with a resolution of 2 cm−1 and the accumulation of 64 scans. For each measurement, pellets were prepared by mixing 198 mg of KBr to 2 mg of finely ground sample. The collected spectra were processed with IR Solution and Origin software, and the principal absorption band in the 850–550 cm−1 region was deconvoluted through the Multiple Peak Fit function available in Origin 8. The FT-IR band deconvolution was performed using Gaussian peak functions. The gaussian fitted parameters have now been reported in the Supplementary Materials (Tables S1–S6) for the deconvoluted samples. The tables include peak position (cm−1), full width at half maximum (FWHM), peak area (a.u.), relative area (%) that was calculated as:
Area   ( % ) = a r e a   ( a . u . )   o f   e a c h   p e a k s u m   o f   a l l   p e a k   a r e a s × 100
The FWHM values were calculated from the Gaussian width parameter obtained from the fitting procedure according to the relation:
FWHM = 2.35482⋅ω
where ω represents Gaussian width parameter of the fitted peak.
To investigate the structural evolution of the hybrids while maintaining clarity of presentation, FT-IR band deconvolution was performed on representative hybrid compositions, allowing the evaluation of the main spectral trends as a function of PEG content.

2.2.4. Biocompatibility Characterization of ZrO2/PEG Hybrids

Cytotoxicity was assessed using the MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay (indirect test) on NIH-3T3 murine fibroblasts. Extracts were obtained from disks of ZrO2 and ZrO2/PEG hybrid sol–gel materials containing 6, 12, 24, 50, 60, and 70 wt% PEG, after immersion for 24 h in 3.5 mL of complete culture medium at 37 °C under continuous stirring. Cells (1.0 × 104/well) were seeded in 96-well plates and exposed to 100 μL of each extract [29]. After 24, 48, and 72 h, the MTT solution (0.5 mg/mL) was added and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. The resulting formazan was dissolved in DMSO, and absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a Tecan SpectraFluor reader. Cell viability was expressed as the percentage of metabolic activity compared with the untreated control. Tests were performed in twelve replicates (n = 12) for three samples per extract.

2.2.5. Antibacterial Activity

The antimicrobial activity of the samples was evaluated through a slightly modified Kirby-Bauer method. The powders were finely ground, pressed into 200 mg discs, and sterilized under UV light for 1 h prior to being placed in direct contact with microbial suspensions (105 CFU/mL). Two bacterial strains were employed: E. coli ATCC25922 (Gram-negative) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) ATCC29212 (Gram-positive), both selected for their clinical importance as common causative agents of nosocomial infections in hospital settings. E. coli and E. faecalis were cultured on Tryptone Bile X-Gluc medium and Slanetz–Bartley agar base, respectively, and incubated in the presence and absence of the discs. After incubation, inhibition zones were recorded, with four measurements taken per Petri dish. Data were expressed as mean ± Standard Deviation (SD).

3. Results

3.1. AFM Morphological Characterization and Surface Roughness Evaluation

The surface roughness and nanoscale surface morphology of the sol–gel-synthesized zirconia-poly(ethylene glycol) (ZrO2/PEG) hybrid systems were assessed using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) in relation to the varying PEG concentrations. Specifically, the AFM approach allowed for the measurement of the surface roughness of the samples and the assessment of the impact of varying PEG concentration on them. In order to illustrate the connection between the surface roughness of the examined samples and their porosity, a thorough AFM investigation was used in this work to examine the morphology of nanostructured hybrids formed by PEG and zirconia (ZrO2) using the sol–gel method in which intermolecular interactions (hydrogen bonds) between the Zr-OH groups and PEG (terminal OH or ethereal oxygen) are clearly observed. The findings showed that the amount of PEG in the hybrid systems increased the material porosity, which increases adhesion and produces sol–gel hybrid materials with excellent bioactivity. Increased porosity causes the ZrO2/PEG nanohybrid’ surface roughness to increase, resulting in variances and irregularities in the materials’ surface topography and morphology.
Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the morphological analysis of ZrO2 and ZrO2/PEG hybrids. In particular, for each sample, the three AFM-2D images, namely Height, Amplitude Error and Phase, are reported on the top in (a) while the corresponding AFM-3D images are reported on the bottom in (b).
Regarding phase distribution, looking at AFM images, while lower percentages of PEG create a more refined, disperse structure, increasing the concentration of PEG can lead to agglomerations causing significant surface irregularities and increased uneven porosity. These findings are in accordance with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations, showing that the morphology of the materials changes progressively with increasing PEG content. Indeed, samples containing low PEG amounts (6–12 wt%) appear compact and homogeneous, with a relatively smooth morphology, while at intermediate PEG contents (24–50 wt%) the microstructure becomes more heterogeneous and filament-like features with an average diameter of about 10 μm appear, and at higher PEG concentrations, the materials exhibit a markedly irregular surface morphology [30,31].
To obtain repeatable and comparable surface roughness measurements and information on the actual substructure and morphological characteristics of the ZrO2 matrix alone and ZrO2/PEG hybrids characterized by different amounts of PEG (6, 12, 24, 50, 60 and 70 wt% with respect to the zirconia content), the same scan size (2 µm), which represents one of the critical experimental conditions to be maintained constant, was used for the different samples analyzed. The quantitative parameters Ra and Rq are defined mathematically, but their value changes if the size of the dataset changes. In conclusion, using the same scan size therefore ensures that the same scale of phenomena is observed, the resolution is comparable, the roughness parameters are comparable, and the comparison is scientifically valid. From a comparison of the different samples, we can easily deduce that AFM images of height, amplitude error, and phase are crucial for studying ZrO2–PEG hybrid materials because they allow us to see the actual topography (height image), identify the structural details of the nanoparticles (amplitude error image), and distinguish the organic and inorganic components thanks to mechanical contrast (phase image). It is precisely the combination of the three channels that allows us to understand how ZrO2 and PEG are distributed, interact, and organized on the surface. The 3D view of AFM images allows for a spatial understanding of the surface and a more accurate assessment of roughness and roughness distribution. 3D AFM images provide information about slope and inclination that are difficult to capture in 2D, where the slope is “compressed” into color.
Table 1 shows the roughness parameters Ra and Rq for the ZrO2 matrix alone and ZrO2/PEG hybrids characterized by different amounts of PEG (6, 12, 24, 50, 60 and 70 wt% with respect to the zirconia content).
The surface roughness parameters Ra and Rq increase from ZrO2 to ZrO2/PEG hybrids and with higher PEG content due to the incorporation of PEG into the ZrO2 matrix, which enhances porosity and creates irregularities in the surface structure. As PEG concentration rises, it disrupts the Zr–O–Zr bridging network, leading to a more complex and rougher surface morphology. This increased surface roughness is indicative of the morphological changes that occur as the organic phase (PEG) interacts with the inorganic phase (ZrO2).
The distribution of the inorganic phase (represented by ZrO2) and the organic phase (represented by PEG) along the three white lines is evaluated using AFM section analysis for the ZrO2 matrix and ZrO2/PEG hybrid systems in Figure 9. The distribution profile of the two phases, which are visible on the right side of the AFM image in the three distinct colors of green, blue, and red, is represented by each white line drawn along the sample surface section.
Although it is feasible to observe the degree of irregularity of the material surface as the weight percentage of PEG increases, the profiles show a fairly regular distribution of the interpenetrated phases for all the samples because the overall structure remains interconnected and cohesive. The PEG incorporation leads to localized surface irregularities without significantly disrupting the uniformity of the phase distribution across the samples. This indicates that while surface morphology becomes more complex, the interpenetration of the ZrO2 and PEG phases maintains a consistent arrangement throughout the material.

3.2. FT-IR Spectroscopy

FT-IR model Prestige 21 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to investigate the interactions between the inorganic and organic phases in ZrO2/PEG hybrids. Figure 10 shows the spectra of ZrO2 with increasing PEG content (6–70 wt%), compared to pure ZrO2 and PEG. ZrO2 synthesized via sol–gel at room temperature and treated at 45 °C to remove organic solvents showed, by X-ray diffractometer (XRD) Philips PW 1730 (Philips, Almelo, The Netherlands), broad diffuse halos typical of amorphous materials, indicating the absence of long-range crystalline order, as reported elsewhere in a previous work [30]. The broad band around 3400 cm−1 is attributed to OH stretching vibrations from residual absorbed water and Zr–OH groups involved in hydrogen bonding. Increasing PEG content caused a shift in this band to lower wavenumbers, up to 22 cm−1 in ZrO2/PEG 70 wt%, indicating an increased interaction between PEG and ZrO2. In 1800 and 1200 cm−1 range, ZrO2 spectra shows peaks related to the presence of AcAc in the matrix, used during sol–gel synthesis. As previously reported, residual AcAc signals appear at 1583, 1530, 1424, 1364, 1282, and 1030 cm−1 [32], and their intensity progressively decreases as the PEG content increases [31].
The incorporation of PEG is strongly highlighted in the FT-IR spectra of the hybrid materials. In particular, the bands at 2915 and 2873 cm−1 correspond to the asymmetric and symmetric C–H stretching vibrations, respectively. In pure PEG, these bands increase in intensity with increasing PEG content. Similarly, the intensity of the methylene C–H bending band at 1455 cm−1 (in pure PEG) increases proportionally with the PEG content. The band at 1250 cm−1, attributed to the alcoholic ν(C–O) stretching, undergoes a slight shift toward lower wavenumbers (down to ~1247 cm−1) in hybrids with a high PEG content. This downshift is consistent with the formation of hydrogen bonds between the terminal CH2–OH group of PEG and the Zr–OH groups of the inorganic matrix, which weaken the C–O bond and reduce its vibrational energy. The broader ether band of pure PEG, centered at ~1100 cm−1 and attributed to ν(C–O–C) stretching, becomes more intense and better defined in the hybrids, also showing a shift toward lower wavenumbers. These changes indicate that PEG is effectively incorporated into the ZrO2 matrix and interacts with the residual AcAc and hydroxyl groups, gradually dominating the spectral features as its concentration increases [33].
The FT-IR spectra also show that the characteristic doublet of amorphous zirconia, corresponding to Zr–OH (∼655 cm−1) [34] and Zr–O–Zr (∼623 cm−1) in pure ZrO2, is affected by the formation of the hybrids. Indeed, a clear modification of this double band is observed upon PEG incorporation, indicating an alteration of the local Zr–O interaction environment induced by the hybrid network [31].
To better understand the structural evolution of the inorganic network upon PEG incorporation, the FT-IR region between 850 and 550 cm−1 was deconvoluted (Figure 11). More details about the fitting parameters are reported in Supplementary Material (Tables S1–S6).
In pure zirconia, the spectrum is characterized by the typical doublet of amorphous ZrO2, with the ν(Zr–O) mode at ~683 cm−1 (yellow band) and the Zr–O–Zr bridging vibration at ~623 cm−1 (violet band), together with the Zr–OH band at ~655 cm−1(blue band) and the lower-frequency Zr–O–Zr deformation at ~577 cm−1 (pink band) [35,36,37].
The band with a maximum at 683 cm−1 in ZrO2 shows an area increasing upon addition of PEG up to 24 wt%, indicating a higher degree of local disorder in partially condensed Zr–O domains due to PEG perturbation of the inorganic ZrO2 network. Above 50 wt% PEG, conversely, this band decreases, in accordance with the transition to a polymer-dominated hybrid in which the relative fraction of zirconia is reduced and the inorganic clusters of Zr–O–Zr become more isolated. The 655 cm−1 band shows a slight decrease up to 24 wt% PEG, likely due to the partial screening of surface Zr–OH groups involved in hydrogen bonding with PEG, as also confirmed by the observed downshift occurred [22] while increasing PEG content. At higher polymer loadings (PEG amount > 50 wt%), the intensity of the band at 655 cm−1, related to surface Zr–OH groups, is not affected by PEG amount. Conversely, the 623 cm−1 band intensity decreases almost linearly with PEG content, confirming the progressive disruption of the Zr–O–Zr bridging network by the PEG chains [38]. Finally, the 577 cm−1 component increases at high PEG loadings, reflecting the formation of more flexible and less-condensed Zr–O–Zr environments.
Conversely, the 623 cm−1 band decreases almost linearly with PEG content, confirming the progressive disruption of the Zr–O–Zr bridging network caused by the organic chains of PEG. The 577 cm−1 band in pure ZrO2 is almost negligible, but upon polymer incorporation it appears even at low PEG content (6 wt%) as a shoulder. In this region, the FTIR spectrum of pure PEG shows a contribution from wagging/rocking modes of –CH2– groups bound to oxygen [39], suggesting that the polymer induces local perturbations in the Zr–O–Zr network. As PEG loading increases, the intensity of the 577 cm−1 band grows markedly, particularly at 70 wt% PEG, reflecting the transition to a polymer-dominated hybrid and the formation of more flexible and disordered Zr–O–Zr environments.

3.3. Biocompatibility Characterization

The ZrO2/PEG hybrids were tested as pressed disks to evaluate their cytotoxicity toward murine fibroblastic NIH-3T3 cells at increasing exposure times (24, 48, and 72 h). Pure zirconia is inherently non-cytotoxic, showing cell viability values above 70% [40]. The addition of PEG to the hybrid system further increases cell viability in proportion to the PEG content, due to its low immunogenicity and toxicity. Moreover, PEG acts as a scaffold material: its hydrophilicity enhances cell attachment and migration, contributing to the improved biocompatibility. This beneficial effect combines with the well-known bioactivity of ZrO2, which promotes bone cell activity, thereby explaining the overall enhancement in biocompatibility [41,42].
These data are consistent with the information obtained by AFM (Table 1): the increase in surface roughness, proportional to the PEG content in the zirconia matrix, facilitates cell adhesion and proliferation. As a result, biocompatibility increases linearly, reaching up to 92% cell viability for the ZrO2/PEG 70 wt% hybrid (Table 2) [1].
A modified agar diffusion test was used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the ZrO2/PEG hybrids against two bacterial strains: E. coli as a Gram-negative model and E. faecalis as a Gram-positive one (Figure 12). The results show that pure ZrO2 exhibits an inhibition halo of 1.8 cm in accordance with scientific literature evidence [43] which decreases proportionally with increasing PEG content, down to 1.3 cm. This value corresponds to the diameter of the sample placed at the center of the plate, meaning that inhibition occurs only at the point of contact. This trend is expected since PEG has no intrinsic antibacterial activity [44], and therefore its higher content dilutes the antibacterial effect. For E. faecalis, pure ZrO2 shows an inhibition halo of 1.3 cm, and this value remains approximately constant even for the ZrO2/PEG 70 wt% hybrids. These results are significant for a greater understanding of aspects directly related to the antibacterial properties of materials for various applications [45,46,47,48].
The results we obtained help to highlight the importance of ZrO2 as promising material also on the basis of the recent applications (nuclear technology, luminescence devices and gas sensors), studies, and achievements related to ZrO2 [49,50,51].

4. Conclusions

The morphological characteristics of ZrO2/PEG hybrids materials (containing 0, 6, 12, 24, 50, 60, and 70 wt% of PEG) prepared through a sol–gel route were analyzed by AFM and include surface topography and roughness. AFM images show an increase in porosity and the formation of irregularities in the morphology with increasing PEG content. Furthermore, roughness parameters, such as Ra and Rq, increase significantly with increasing PEG concentration, highlighting the changes in the surface structure of the materials. The surface roughness of ZrO2/PEG hybrids increases with increasing PEG content, which promotes cell adhesion and proliferation, thus improving biocompatibility. However, increasing PEG concentration reduces antibacterial activity, as PEG has no intrinsic antibacterial activity and dilutes the effect of ZrO2. Therefore, there is an inverse correlation between surface roughness and antibacterial activity, while surface roughness is positive for biocompatibility. The most salient results of the morphological characterization of ZrO2/PEG hybrids are reported below:
  • Atomic force microscopy (AFM) revealed an increase in porosity and surface roughness with increasing PEG content. As PEG concentration rises, it disrupts the Zr–O–Zr bridging network, leading to a more complex and rougher surface morphology. This increased surface roughness is indicative of the morphological changes that occur as the organic phase (PEG) interacts with the inorganic phase (ZrO2).
  • FT-IR spectroscopy confirmed the interaction between the inorganic and organic phases. In particular, FT-IR deconvolution in the 850–550 cm−1 region indicates that PEG incorporation progressively perturbs the Zr–O–Zr network. As PEG content increases, the inorganic framework becomes more disordered and develops more flexible domains, suggesting reduced crosslinking within the zirconia matrix.
  • Biocompatibility increased with increasing PEG content, reaching 92% cell viability for the 70 wt% ZrO2/PEG hybrid. This improvement is attributed to the low immunogenicity and toxicity of PEG, which promotes cell adhesion and migration. In fact, biological assays reveal that higher PEG amounts enhance the viability of NIH-3T3 fibroblasts, likely due to increased hydrophilicity and reduced surface rigidity.
  • The antibacterial activity of ZrO2 decreased with increasing PEG content, highlighting the lack of intrinsic PEG activity, with pure ZrO2 exhibiting the strongest inhibitory effect against E. coli. This trend suggests that PEG softens or shields the inorganic surface, diminishing its bactericidal efficiency.
  • The PEG content significantly affects the surface roughness of ZrO2/PEG hybrids, with an increase in roughness (Ra and Rq) proportional to the amount of PEG. For example, the roughness Ra increases from 105 nm for pure ZrO2 to 645 nm for the 70 wt% ZrO2/PEG hybrid. This increase in roughness facilitates cell adhesion and proliferation, improving the material’s biocompatibility.
  • AFM reveals that PEG in zirconia blends functions as a structure-directing agent, enhancing surface roughness through its role as a pore-former, and facilitating the creations of organic-inorganic hybrids.
  • This work stands out for its in-depth analysis, which combines morphological observations with biological performance assessments, offering new insights into the field of biomaterials. Therefore, the research significantly contributes to the understanding of the interactions between structure and functionality in these hybrid systems.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcs10040187/s1, Table S1: Sample composition expressed in g of each component. Table S2: Gaussian fitting parameters of FT IR band deconvolution of ZrO2 R2: 0.99887. Table S3: Gaussian fitting parameters of FT IR band deconvolution of ZrO2/PEG 6 wt.% R2: 0.99868. Table S4: Gaussian fitting parameters of FT IR band deconvolution of ZrO2/PEG 24 wt.% R2: 0.99837. Table S5: Gaussian fitting parameters of FT IR band deconvolution of ZrO2/PEG 50 wt.% R2: 0.99920. Table S6: Gaussian fitting parameters of FT IR band deconvolution of ZrO2/PEG 70 wt.% R2: 0.99976.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R. and M.C.; methodology, A.D., M.R. and M.C.; software, M.F., R.L., L.V. and A.D.; validation, M.R. and M.C.; formal analysis, A.D., R.L. and L.V.; investigation, A.D., M.F. and M.R.; resources, M.R. and M.C.; data curation, M.F., R.L. and L.V.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R.; writing—review and editing, M.R. and M.C.; visualization, M.F., R.L., L.V. and M.C.; supervision, M.R. and M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Catauro, M.; Papale, F.; Bollino, F.; Gallicchio, M.; Pacifico, S. Biological evaluation of zirconia/PEG hybrid materials synthesized via sol–gel technique. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 40, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Catauro, M.; Papale, F.; Piccirillo, G.; Bollino, F. PEG-based organic–inorganic hybrid coatings prepared by the sol–gel dip-coating process for biomedical applications. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2017, 57, 478–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, A.; Shen, H.; Ren, H.; Wang, C.; Wu, D.; Martin, R.A.; Qiu, D. Bioactive organic/inorganic hybrids with improved mechanical performance. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 1379–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cui, Y.; Chen, Z.; Liu, X. Preparation of UV-curing polymer-ZrO2 hybrid nanocomposites via auto-hydrolysis sol-gel process using zirconium oxychloride octahydrate coordinated with organic amine. Prog. Org. Coat. 2016, 100, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Catauro, M.; Tranquillo, E.; Illiano, M.; Sapio, L.; Spina, A.; Naviglio, S. The Influence of the Polymer Amount on the Biological Properties of PCL/ZrO2 Hybrid Materials Synthesized via Sol-Gel Technique. Materials 2017, 10, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chang, H.; Wei, H.; Qi, Y.; Ding, S.; Li, H.; Si, S. Advances in hybrid hydrogel design for biomedical applications: Innovations in drug delivery and tissue engineering for gynecological cancers. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2025, 41, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liang, Q.; Xiang, H.; Li, X.; Luo, C.; Ma, X.; Zhao, W.; Chen, J.; Tian, Z.; Li, X.; Song, X. Development of Rifapentine-Loaded PLGA-Based Nanoparticles: In vitro Characterisation and in vivo Study in Mice. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 7491–7507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jeba, R.; Radhika, S.; Padma, C.M.; Ascar Davix, X. Antimicrobial and photocatalytic activities of strontium doped zirconium oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Lett. 2022, 311, 131559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pratap, S.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, H. Improved antimicrobial efficacy of copper-engineered zirconium oxide nanoparticles against some foodborne bacterial strains, synthesised via a facile hydrothermal method. Surf. Interfaces 2025, 58, 105878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tabassum, M.; Kumar, D.; Verma, D.; Bohara, R.A.; Singh, M.P. Zirconium oxide (ZrO2) nanoparticles from antibacterial activity to cytotoxicity: A next-generation of multifunctional nanoparticles. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 26, 102156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bahammam, H.A.; Bahammam, L.A.; Baghdadi, A.M.; Saddiq, A.; Algamal, Y. Antimicrobial Activity of Nanozirconium Oxide. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 2945–2952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ziąbka, M.; Wojteczko, A.; Klesiewicz, K.; Menaszek, E.; Komarek, S.; Kwaśniewski, P.; Chrzanowski, W. Antimicrobial properties and bioactivity of zirconia-based biocomposites. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2025, 53, 361–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, W.; Thian, E.S.; Wang, M.; Wang, Z.; Ren, L. Surface Design for Antibacterial Materials: From Fundamentals to Advanced Strategies. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2100368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, X.; Zhou, J.; Qian, Y.; Zhao, L. Antibacterial coatings on orthopedic implants. Mater. Today Bio 2023, 19, 100586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lu, A.; Gao, Y.; Jin, T.; Luo, X.; Zeng, Q.; Shang, Z. Effects of surface roughness and texture on the bacterial adhesion on the bearing surface of bio-ceramic joint implants: An in vitro study. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 6550–6559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Agarwal, M.; Ganesan, R.; Ray Dutta, J. Functional nanomaterials in combating antimicrobial resistance: Innovations in wound dressings and biomedical implants. Nano Trends 2026, 13, 100174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marrese, M.; Guarino, V.; Ambrosio, L. Atomic Force Microscopy: A Powerful Tool to Address Scaffold Design in Tissue Engineering. J. Funct. Biomater. 2017, 8, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. da Silva, V.A.; Bobotis, B.C.; Correia, F.F.; Lima-Vasconcellos, T.H.; Chiarantin, G.M.D.; De La Vega, L.; Lombello, C.B.; Willerth, S.M.; Malmonge, S.M.; Paschon, V. The Impact of Biomaterial Surface Properties on Engineering Neural Tissue for Spinal Cord Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zeng, H.; Sun, W.; Tang, H.; Jiang, F.; Wang, L. Surface Roughness and Its Role in Flotation Behavior, Wettability, and Bubble–Particle Interactions: A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 4557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gambardella, A.; Marchiori, G.; Maglio, M.; Boi, M.; Montesissa, M.; Bertacchini, J.; Biressi, S.; Baldini, N.; Giavaresi, G.; Bontempi, M. On the Interplay Between Roughness and Elastic Modulus at the Nanoscale: A Methodology Study with Bone as Model Material. J. Funct. Biomater. 2025, 16, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Georgakopoulos-Soares, I.; Papazoglou, E.L.; Karmiris-Obratański, P.; Karkalos, N.E.; Markopoulos, A.P. Surface antibacterial properties enhanced through engineered textures and surface roughness: A review. Colloids Surf. B 2023, 231, 113584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Uzorka, A.; Mukhokosi, E.P. Atomic Force Microscopy in Structural and Functional Studies of Biomolecules. Biophys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 20, 117–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Joo, S.; Eom, S.; Choi, Y.; Jeong, U.; Cho, Y.; Yu, W.; Park, K.; Hong, S. Atomic Force Microscopy for Cross-Disciplinary Materials Research. Small Methods 2025, 9, 2500514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Harjumäki, R.; Zhang, X.; Nugroho, R.W.N.; Farooq, M.; Lou, Y.R.; Yliperttula, M.; Valle-Delgado, J.J.; Österberg, M. AFM Force Spectroscopy Reveals the Role of Integrins and Their Activation in Cell–Biomaterial Interactions. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 1406–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nguyen-Tri, P.; Ghassemi, P.; Carriere, P.; Nanda, S.; Assadi, A.A.; Nguyen, D.D. Recent Applications of Advanced Atomic Force Microscopy in Polymer Science: A Review. Polymers 2020, 12, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nobile, M.R.; Raimondo, M.; Naddeo, C.; Guadagno, L. Rheological and Morphological Properties of Non-Covalently Functionalized Graphene-Based Structural Epoxy Resins with Intrinsic Electrical Conductivity and Thermal Stability. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pinto, D.; Amaro, A.M.; Bernardo, L. Experimental study on the surface properties of nanoalumina-filled epoxy resin nanocomposites. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Catauro, M.; Raimondo, M.; Vertuccio, L.; Guadagno, L.; D’Angelo, A. The pivotal role of the polyethylene glycol amount as compatibilizing on the morphological features of silica-based blends. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2024, 38, 188–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Piccolella, S.; Fiorentino, M.; Cimmino, G.; Esposito, A.; Pacifico, S. Cilentan Cichorium intybus L. organs: UHPLC-QqTOF-MS/MS analysis for new antioxidant scenario, exploitable locally and beyond. Future Foods 2024, 9, 100379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Catauro, M.; Bollino, F.; Papale, F.; Mozzati, M.C.; Ferrara, C.; Mustarelli, P. ZrO2/PEG hybrid nanocomposites synthesized via sol–gel: Characterization and evaluation of the magnetic properties. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2015, 413, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vecchio Ciprioti, S.; Bollino, F.; Tranquillo, E.; Catauro, M. Synthesis, thermal behavior and physicochemical characterization of ZrO2/PEG inorganic/organic hybrid materials via sol–gel technique. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 130, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fiorentino, M.; D’Angelo, A.; Comune, L.; Vertuccio, L.; Blanco, I.; Catauro, M. Thermal, chemical, and biological characterization of a bioactive zirconia material embedded with orange peel extract. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2025, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Georgieva, I.; Danchova, N.; Gutzov, S.; Trendafilova, N. DFT modeling, UV-Vis and IR spectroscopic study of acetylacetone-modified zirconia sol-gel materials. J. Mol. Model. 2012, 18, 2409–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dimitrov, O.; Stambolova, I.; Vassilev, S.; Lazarova, K.; Babeva, T.; Mladenova, R. Surface and Morphological Features of ZrO2 Sol-Gel Coatings Obtained by Polymer Modified Solution. Mater. Proc. 2020, 2, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chitoria, A.K.; Mir, A.; Shah, M.A. A review of ZrO2 nanoparticles applications and recent advancements. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 32343–32358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Štefanić, G.; Musić, S.; Popović, S.; Furić, K. Formation of ZrO2 by the Thermal Decomposition of Zirconium Salts. Croat. Chem. Acta 1996, 69, 223–239. [Google Scholar]
  37. He, X.; Zhang, H.X.; Li, Y.; Hong, C. Characterization of Nano-Porous Silica-Zirconia Aerogels. Solid. State Phenom. 2007, 121–123, 1289–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Maresz, K.; Ciemięga, A.; Bezkosty, P.; Kornaus, K.; Sitarz, M.; Krzywiecki, M.; Mrowiec-Białon, J. Insight into Structural and Physicochemical Properties of ZrO2-SiO2 Monolithic Catalysts with Hierarchical Pore Structure: Effect of Zirconium Precursor. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Silverstein, R.M.; Webster, F.X.; Kiemle, D. Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds, 8th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  40. D’Angelo, A.; Mortalò, C.; Comune, L.; Raffaini, G.; Fiorentino, M.; Catauro, M. Sol–Gel Synthesized Silica/Sodium Alginate Hybrids: Comprehensive Physico-Chemical and Biological Characterization. Molecules 2025, 30, 3481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Paneer Selvam, S.; Ayyappan, S.; I Jamir, S.; Sellappan, L.K.; Manoharan, S. Recent advancements of hydroxyapatite and polyethylene glycol (PEG) composites for tissue engineering applications—A comprehensive review. Eur. Polym. J. 2024, 215, 113226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jahani, A.; Nassira, H. Polyethylene Glycol-Based Materials: Transformative Applications in Biomedicine and the Food Industry. Mater. Chem. Horizons 2024, 3, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Al-Ibraheemi, Z.; Hanoon, Z.; Al-Hmedat, S.; Ibrahim, S.; Ahmed, A.; Aljdaimi, A. An Evaluation of Bacterial Inhibition on E-max and Zirconia Disks after Different Surface Treatments: A Comparative In vitro Study. Open Microbiol. J. 2025, 19, e18742858379055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nalawade, T.M.; Bhat, K.; Sogi, S.H. Bactericidal activity of propylene glycol, glycerine, polyethylene glycol 400, and polyethylene glycol 1000 against selected microorganisms. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2015, 5, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Radulescu, D.-E.; Vasile, B.S.; Vasile, O.R.; Neacsu, I.A.; Trusca, R.D.; Surdu, V.-A.; Birca, A.C.; Dolete, G.; Ilie, C.-I.; Andronescu, E. Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Synthesis of Cu/Sr-Doped Hydroxyapatite with Prospective Applications for Bone Tissue Engineering. J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Burunkova, J.A.; Semykina, V.V.; Sitnikova, V.E.; Dolgintsev, D.M.; Zaripova, F.F.; Ponomareva, A.A.; Mizina, D.R.; Csick, A.; Kokenyesi, S.; Zhilenkov, A. Antibacterial UV-Curable Gel with Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles for Regenerative Medicine in the Field of Orthopedics. J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dorozhkin, S.V. Calcium Orthophosphate (CaPO4) Containing Composites for Biomedical Applications: Formulations, Properties, and Applications. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Crãciun, C.A.; Ungureanu, C.; Brîncoveanu, O.; Bîru, E.I.; Pîrvu, C.; Dumitriu, C. Development of Nanostructured Composite Coating with Antibacterial Properties on Anodized Stainless Steel. J. Compos. Sci. 2026, 10, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kozlovskiy, A.L.; Konuhova, M.; Borgekov, D.B.; Anatoli, P. Study of irradiation temperature effect on radiation-induced polymorphic transformation mechanisms in ZrO2 ceramics. Opt. Mater. 2024, 156, 115994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bandarenka, H.; Burko, A.; Laputsko, D.; Dronina, L.; Kovalchuk, N.; Podelinska, A.; Shapel, U.; Popov, A.I.; Bocharov, D. Ultraviolet Exposure Improves SERS Activity of Graphene-Coated Ag/ZrO2 Substrates. Crystals 2023, 13, 1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Smits, K.; Grigorjeva, L.; Millers, D.; Kundzins, K.; Ignatans, R.; Grabis, J.; Monty, C. Luminescence properties of zirconia nanocrystals prepared by solar physical vapor deposition. Opt. Mater. 2014, 37, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow chart of ZrO2/PEG hybrids via sol–gel synthesis. Each PEG composition was prepared as an independent synthesis batch using a freshly prepared zirconium precursor solution.
Figure 1. Flow chart of ZrO2/PEG hybrids via sol–gel synthesis. Each PEG composition was prepared as an independent synthesis batch using a freshly prepared zirconium precursor solution.
Jcs 10 00187 g001
Figure 2. Morphological analysis of ZrO2: (a) AFM-2D images (10 µm × 10 µm); (b) AFM-3D images (10 µm × 10 µm).
Figure 2. Morphological analysis of ZrO2: (a) AFM-2D images (10 µm × 10 µm); (b) AFM-3D images (10 µm × 10 µm).
Jcs 10 00187 g002
Figure 3. Morphological analysis of ZrO2/PEG 6 wt%: (a) AFM-2D images (10 µm × 10 µm); (b) AFM-3D images (10 µm × 10 µm).
Figure 3. Morphological analysis of ZrO2/PEG 6 wt%: (a) AFM-2D images (10 µm × 10 µm); (b) AFM-3D images (10 µm × 10 µm).
Jcs 10 00187 g003
Figure 4. Morphological analysis of ZrO2/PEG 12 wt%: (a) AFM-2D images (10 µm × 10 µm); (b) AFM-3D images (10 µm × 10 µm).
Figure 4. Morphological analysis of ZrO2/PEG 12 wt%: (a) AFM-2D images (10 µm × 10 µm); (b) AFM-3D images (10 µm × 10 µm).
Jcs 10 00187 g004
Figure 5. Morphological analysis of ZrO2/PEG 24 wt%: (a) AFM-2D images (10 µm × 10 µm); (b) AFM-3D images (10 µm × 10 µm).
Figure 5. Morphological analysis of ZrO2/PEG 24 wt%: (a) AFM-2D images (10 µm × 10 µm); (b) AFM-3D images (10 µm × 10 µm).
Jcs 10 00187 g005
Figure 6. Morphological analysis of ZrO2/PEG 50 wt%: (a) AFM-2D images (10 µm × 10 µm); (b) AFM-3D images (10 µm × 10 µm).
Figure 6. Morphological analysis of ZrO2/PEG 50 wt%: (a) AFM-2D images (10 µm × 10 µm); (b) AFM-3D images (10 µm × 10 µm).
Jcs 10 00187 g006
Figure 7. Morphological analysis of ZrO2/PEG 60 wt%: (a) AFM-2D images (10 µm × 10 µm); (b) AFM-3D images (10 µm × 10 µm).
Figure 7. Morphological analysis of ZrO2/PEG 60 wt%: (a) AFM-2D images (10 µm × 10 µm); (b) AFM-3D images (10 µm × 10 µm).
Jcs 10 00187 g007
Figure 8. Morphological analysis of ZrO2/PEG 70 wt%: (a) AFM-2D images (10 µm × 10 µm); (b) AFM-3D images (10 µm × 10 µm).
Figure 8. Morphological analysis of ZrO2/PEG 70 wt%: (a) AFM-2D images (10 µm × 10 µm); (b) AFM-3D images (10 µm × 10 µm).
Jcs 10 00187 g008
Figure 9. AFM section analysis of the ZrO2 matrix alone and ZrO2/PEG hybrids (ZrO2/PEG 6 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 12 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 24 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 50 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 60 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 70 wt%,).
Figure 9. AFM section analysis of the ZrO2 matrix alone and ZrO2/PEG hybrids (ZrO2/PEG 6 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 12 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 24 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 50 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 60 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 70 wt%,).
Jcs 10 00187 g009aJcs 10 00187 g009b
Figure 10. FTIR spectra of ZrO2/PEG hybrids.
Figure 10. FTIR spectra of ZrO2/PEG hybrids.
Jcs 10 00187 g010
Figure 11. Deconvolution analysis of FTIR band in 850–500 cm−1.
Figure 11. Deconvolution analysis of FTIR band in 850–500 cm−1.
Jcs 10 00187 g011
Figure 12. Antibacterial activity of ZrO2/PEG hybrids against E. coli and E. faecalis bacterial strains.
Figure 12. Antibacterial activity of ZrO2/PEG hybrids against E. coli and E. faecalis bacterial strains.
Jcs 10 00187 g012
Table 1. Roughness parameters Ra and Rq for the ZrO2 matrix alone and ZrO2/PEG hybrids (ZrO2/PEG 6 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 12 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 24 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 50 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 60 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 70 wt%).
Table 1. Roughness parameters Ra and Rq for the ZrO2 matrix alone and ZrO2/PEG hybrids (ZrO2/PEG 6 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 12 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 24 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 50 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 60 wt%, ZrO2/PEG 70 wt%).
SampleRa (nm)Rq (nm)
ZrO2105134
ZrO2/PEG 6 wt%133167
ZrO2/PEG 12 wt%175212
ZrO2/PEG 24 wt%279351
ZrO2/PEG 50 wt%480592
ZrO2/PEG 60 wt%562685
ZrO2/PEG 70 wt%645768
Table 2. Cell viability of ZrO2 and ZrO2/PEG hybrid materials against NIH-3T3 cells.
Table 2. Cell viability of ZrO2 and ZrO2/PEG hybrid materials against NIH-3T3 cells.
Sample24 h CV %48 h CV %72 h CV %
ZrO278.20 ± 1.8077.30 ± 1.5076.10 ± 1.20
ZrO2/PEG 6 wt%82.40 ± 1.6080.50 ± 1.2078.90 ± 1.00
ZrO2/PEG 12 wt%85.10 ± 1.0082.60 ± 0.8080.40 ± 0.70
ZrO2/PEG 24 wt%87.30 ± 1.3084.20 ± 1.0082.50 ± 0.90
ZrO2/PEG 50 wt%90.10 ± 1.5086.30 ± 1.2084.70 ± 1.00
ZrO2/PEG 60 wt%91.20 ± 1.0087.40 ± 0.9085.30 ± 0.80
ZrO2/PEG 70 wt%92.00 ± 2.5088.10 ± 2.0086.20 ± 1.00
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

D’Angelo, A.; Fiorentino, M.; Raimondo, M.; Longo, R.; Vertuccio, L.; Catauro, M. Correlation Between the Morphological Characteristics by Atomic Force Microscopy and the Biological Properties of Bioactive Zirconia/Polyethylene Glycol (ZrO2/PEG) Hybrids. J. Compos. Sci. 2026, 10, 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10040187

AMA Style

D’Angelo A, Fiorentino M, Raimondo M, Longo R, Vertuccio L, Catauro M. Correlation Between the Morphological Characteristics by Atomic Force Microscopy and the Biological Properties of Bioactive Zirconia/Polyethylene Glycol (ZrO2/PEG) Hybrids. Journal of Composites Science. 2026; 10(4):187. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10040187

Chicago/Turabian Style

D’Angelo, Antonio, Marika Fiorentino, Marialuigia Raimondo, Raffaele Longo, Luigi Vertuccio, and Michelina Catauro. 2026. "Correlation Between the Morphological Characteristics by Atomic Force Microscopy and the Biological Properties of Bioactive Zirconia/Polyethylene Glycol (ZrO2/PEG) Hybrids" Journal of Composites Science 10, no. 4: 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10040187

APA Style

D’Angelo, A., Fiorentino, M., Raimondo, M., Longo, R., Vertuccio, L., & Catauro, M. (2026). Correlation Between the Morphological Characteristics by Atomic Force Microscopy and the Biological Properties of Bioactive Zirconia/Polyethylene Glycol (ZrO2/PEG) Hybrids. Journal of Composites Science, 10(4), 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10040187

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop