PCD Tool Wear Mechanism and Prediction in Laser–Ultrasonic Synergistic Milling of High-Volume-Fraction SiCp/Al Composites
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials and Experimental Equipment
2.2. Experimental Scheme Design
3. Results
3.1. Influences of Milling Parameters on Milling Forces
3.1.1. Effects of Milling Speed on Milling Forces
3.1.2. Effects of Feed per Tooth on Milling Forces
3.1.3. Influence of Milling Depth Variation on Milling‑Force Responses
3.1.4. Effects of Laser Power on Milling Forces
3.1.5. Effects of Ultrasonic Amplitude on Milling Forces
3.2. Influence of Milling Parameters on Tool Wear Quantity
3.3. Multiple Linear Regression Model for PCD Tool Wear Loss
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, H.X.; Yang, J.; Liu, Z.S.; Zhai, W.J. Experimental research on the tool wear during precision milling process of SiCp/Al composite materials. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2012, 20, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
- Hao, Z.P.; Xu, Y.S.; Fan, Y.H.; Lin, J.Q. Overview of research on machining mechanism of aluminum-based silicon carbide composites (SiCp/Al). Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 2024, 133, 3133–3149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhou, Y.; Zhang, D.Y.; Wang, W.D.; Li, L.S. Current Situation and Aerospace Applications Analysis Based on SiC Particle Reinforced Aluminum Matrix Composites Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting. Aeronaut. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 61, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, P.C.; Yan, X.Z.; Wu, S.; Chu, J.H.; Yang, B.Y. Precision Milling Experiment Study of High-Volume Fraction SiCp/Al Composites. Aerosp. Shanghai (Chin. Engl.) 2024, 41, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Y.; Li, L.F.; Li, J.L.; Ren, J.Y. High volume fraction SiC/Al composites for space-based optomechanical structures. Opt. Precis. Eng. 2007, 15, 1175–1180. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, C.Y.; Han, J.S.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, B.; Tang, J.Y. Research Progress on High Efficiency and Low Damage Processing Technology of SiCp/Al Composite. Tool Eng. 2025, 59, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zha, H.T.; Feng, P.F.; Zhang, J.F.; Yu, D.W.; Wu, Z.J. Wear characteristics of cutting tools in ultrasonic vibration assisted scratching high volume fraction SiC particle reinforced aluminum matrix composites. J. Jilin Univ. (Eng. Technol. Ed.) 2019, 49, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.H.; Zhou, Y.Q.; Li, J.M.; Zhu, F.L. Materials removal mechanism and multi modes feature for silicon carbide during scratching. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2022, 235, 107719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lin, J.Q.; Jia, R.; Zhou, Y.; Gu, Y. PCD tool wear in cutting SiCp/6005Al composites. Diam. Abras. Eng. 2023, 43, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.J.; Zhan, Y.Y.; Li, Z.X. Research progress on the wear problem of polycrystalline diamond cutting tools. Superhard Mater. Eng. 2025, 37, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
- Grigoriev, S.N.; Volosova, M.A.; Okunkova, A.A. Investigation of Surface Layer Condition of SiAlON Ceramic Inserts and Its Influence on Tool Durability When Turning Nickel-Based Superalloy. Technologies 2023, 11, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, H.P.; Wang, B.W.; Qu, L.Q.; Wang, X.R. Optimization of Tool Wear and Cutting Parameters in SCCO2-MQL Ultrasonic Vibration Milling of SiCp/Al Composites. Machines 2024, 12, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yu, W.W.; Chen, J.; Ming, W.W.; An, Q.L.; Chen, M. Experimental and FEM study of cutting mechanism and damage behavior of ceramic particles in orthogonal cutting SiCp/Al composites. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 7183–7194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhou, Y.; Gu, Y.; Lin, J.Q.; Zhao, H.B.; Liu, S.Y.; Xu, Z.S.; Yu, H.; Fu, X.B. Finite element analysis and experimental study on the cutting mechanism of SiCp/Al composites by ultrasonic vibration-assisted cutting. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 35406–35421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ali, R.L.; Li, J.G. Modeling and optimization of cutting forces and effect of turning parameters on SiCp/Al 45% vs SiCp/Al 50% metal matrix composites: A comparative study. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sun, W.C.; Liu, P.Z.; Cao, J.W.; Wang, W.; Peng, C.; Chen, H.W.; Du, H.H. Laser assisted machining of hard and brittle materials in aerospace fields: A review. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2026, 104168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Eshelby, J.D.; Frank, F.C.; Nabarro, F.R.N. XLI. The equilibrium of linear arrays of dislocations. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 1951, 42, 351–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zheng, W.; Zhou, M.; Zhou, L. Influence of process parameters on surface topography in ultrasonic vibration-assisted end grinding of SiCp/Al composites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 91, 2347–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ji, C.H.; Hu, S.G.; Xu, W.H.; Wang, X.M.; Xu, L.D.; Xin, H.Y.; Dong, L.; Zhang, X.T.; Zhang, Y.B.; Ma, X.; et al. Kinematic analysis of ultrasonic vibration-assisted milling SiCp/Al composites and surface quantity assessment. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2025, 141, 351–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fan, Y.H.; Yang, C.H.; Hao, Z.P. Analysis of interfacial failure and particle damage of SiCp/Al with ultrasonic vibration-assisted cutting. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2025, 169, 109225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhao, G.L.; Xin, L.J.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; He, N.; Hansen, H.N. Cutting force model and damage formation mechanism in milling of 70wt% Si/Al composite. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2023, 36, 114–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fan, Y.H.; Xu, Y.S.; Hao, Z.P.; Lin, J.Q. Dynamic behavior description and three-dimensional cutting simulation of SiCp/Al composites with high volume fraction. J. Manuf. Process. 2022, 77, 174–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sun, S.J.; Chen, Z.Y.; Liu, D.L.; Liu, S.Y. Simulation and Experimental Study on Milling of SiCp/Al Composites. Model. Simul. 2024, 13, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, H.P.; Wu, Y.H. Effects of Cutting Parameters for Marble Milling on Wear of PCD Cutters. Surf. Technol. 2017, 46, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Z.W.; Chen, Q.H.; Shi, Y.G.; Song, P. Wear Mechanisms of PCD Tools in High-Speed Milling of High Volume Fraction of SiCp/Al Composites. Tool Eng. 2016, 50, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| Density [g/cm3] | Poisson’s Ratio | Shear Modulus [GPa] | Flexural Strength [MPa] |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.02 | 0.28 | 99.6 | 395 |
| Levels | Milling Speed vw (m/min) | Feed Per Tooth fz (mm/z) | Cutting Depth ap (mm) | Laser Power P (W) | Ultrasonic Amplitude A (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 20 | 2.0 |
| 2 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 40 | 2.5 |
| 3 | 150 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 60 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 200 | 0.08 | 0.2 | 80 | 3.5 |
| Number | Milling Speed vw (m/min) | Feed Per Tooth fz (mm/z) | Cutting Depth ap (mm) | Laser Power P (W) | Ultrasonic Amplitude A (μm) | Fx(N) | Fy(N) | Fz(N) | Tool Wear Loss (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 20 | 2.0 | 31.623 | 13.106 | 28.732 | 1.1 |
| 2 | 50 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 40 | 2.5 | 28.894 | 20.846 | 41.867 | 1.5 |
| 3 | 50 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 60 | 3.0 | 37.998 | 22.128 | 54.005 | 1.9 |
| 4 | 50 | 0.08 | 0.2 | 80 | 3.5 | 60.359 | 19.756 | 44.537 | 2.5 |
| 5 | 100 | 0.02 | 0.1 | 60 | 3.5 | 21.985 | 15.698 | 45.316 | 1.0 |
| 6 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 80 | 3.0 | 36.038 | 18.663 | 24.111 | 1.9 |
| 7 | 100 | 0.06 | 0.2 | 20 | 2.5 | 55.214 | 18.413 | 46.312 | 2.6 |
| 8 | 100 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 40 | 2.0 | 40.211 | 25.744 | 54.212 | 2.2 |
| 9 | 150 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 80 | 2.5 | 29.035 | 16.03 | 31.595 | 1.8 |
| 10 | 150 | 0.04 | 0.2 | 60 | 2.0 | 44.014 | 21.68 | 38.762 | 2.3 |
| 11 | 150 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 40 | 3.5 | 21.328 | 20.935 | 24.073 | 1.8 |
| 12 | 150 | 0.08 | 0.1 | 20 | 3.0 | 34.541 | 22.978 | 44.911 | 2.5 |
| 13 | 200 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 40 | 3.0 | 32.648 | 14.471 | 34.066 | 1.9 |
| 14 | 200 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 20 | 3.5 | 29.407 | 20.008 | 47.108 | 2.1 |
| 15 | 200 | 0.06 | 0.1 | 80 | 2.0 | 36.981 | 15.073 | 31.631 | 1.9 |
| 16 | 200 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 60 | 2.5 | 25.955 | 21.162 | 37.444 | 2.2 |
| Number | Milling Speed vw (m/min) | Feed Per Tooth fz (mm/z) | Cutting Depth ap (mm) | Laser Power P (W) | Ultrasonic Amplitude A (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 60 | 3.0 |
| 2 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 60 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 150 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 60 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 200 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 60 | 3.0 |
| Number | Milling Speed vw (m/min) | Feed Per Tooth fz (mm/z) | Cutting Depth ap (mm) | Laser Power P (W) | Ultrasonic Amplitude A (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 0.02 | 0.1 | 60 | 3.0 |
| 2 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 60 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 100 | 0.06 | 0.1 | 60 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 100 | 0.08 | 0.1 | 60 | 3.0 |
| Number | Milling Speed vw (m/min) | Feed Per Tooth fz (mm/z) | Cutting Depth ap (mm) | Laser Power P (W) | Ultrasonic Amplitude A (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 60 | 3.0 |
| 2 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 60 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 60 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.2 | 60 | 3.0 |
| Number | Milling Speed vw (m/min) | Feed Per Tooth fz (mm/z) | Cutting Depth ap (mm) | Laser Power P (W) | Ultrasonic Amplitude A (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 20 | 3.0 |
| 2 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 40 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 60 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 80 | 3.0 |
| Number | Milling Speed vw (m/min) | Feed Per Tooth fz (mm/z) | Cutting Depth ap (mm) | Laser Power P (W) | Ultrasonic Amplitude A (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 60 | 2.0 |
| 2 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 60 | 2.5 |
| 3 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 60 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 60 | 3.5 |
| Value | Milling Speed vw (m/min) | Feed Per Tooth fz (mm/z) | Cutting Depth ap (mm) | Laser Power P (W) | Ultrasonic Amplitude A (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75 | 1.45 | 1.75 | 2.075 | 1.875 |
| 2 | 1.925 | 1.95 | 1.725 | 1.85 | 2.025 |
| 3 | 2.100 | 2.05 | 2.0 | 1.85 | 2.05 |
| 4 | 2.025 | 2.35 | 2.325 | 2.025 | 1.85 |
| Range value | 0.35 | 0,9 | 0.6 | 0.225 | 0.2 |
| Sample | Measured Wear Value | Predicted Wear Value | Relative Error |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.100000 | 1.069869 | 2.74% |
| 2 | 1.500000 | 1.577655 | −5.18% |
| 3 | 1.900000 | 1.979332 | −4.18% |
| 4 | 2.500000 | 2.324508 | 7.02% |
| 5 | 1.000000 | 1.359221 | −35.92% |
| 6 | 1.900000 | 1.495894 | 21.27% |
| 7 | 2.600000 | 2.386879 | 8.20% |
| 8 | 2.200000 | 2.466945 | −12.13% |
| 9 | 1.800000 | 1.578917 | 12.28% |
| 10 | 2.300000 | 2.168371 | 5.72% |
| 11 | 1.800000 | 1.859359 | −3.30% |
| 12 | 2.500000 | 2.422650 | 3.09% |
| 13 | 1.900000 | 1.772456 | 6.71% |
| 14 | 2.100000 | 2.154417 | −2.59% |
| 15 | 1.900000 | 2.248267 | −18.33% |
| 16 | 2.200000 | 2.149889 | 2.28% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Yang, L.; Zhao, K.; Qi, J.; Liu, E.; Yuan, S.; Lü, Q.; Li, G. PCD Tool Wear Mechanism and Prediction in Laser–Ultrasonic Synergistic Milling of High-Volume-Fraction SiCp/Al Composites. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2026, 10, 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp10080305
Yang L, Zhao K, Qi J, Liu E, Yuan S, Lü Q, Li G. PCD Tool Wear Mechanism and Prediction in Laser–Ultrasonic Synergistic Milling of High-Volume-Fraction SiCp/Al Composites. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2026; 10(8):305. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp10080305
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Liquan, Kun Zhao, Jianhao Qi, Erbo Liu, Sen Yuan, Qingqing Lü, and Guangxi Li. 2026. "PCD Tool Wear Mechanism and Prediction in Laser–Ultrasonic Synergistic Milling of High-Volume-Fraction SiCp/Al Composites" Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 10, no. 8: 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp10080305
APA StyleYang, L., Zhao, K., Qi, J., Liu, E., Yuan, S., Lü, Q., & Li, G. (2026). PCD Tool Wear Mechanism and Prediction in Laser–Ultrasonic Synergistic Milling of High-Volume-Fraction SiCp/Al Composites. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 10(8), 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp10080305
