Previous Article in Journal
A Reinforcement Learning Approach for Climate Change Adaptation and Policy: Using a Deep Q-Network for Multi-Sectorial Resilience in Kitui County, Kenya
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Gaze Behavior Towards Children in Pedophilia and Hebephilia †

Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the International Online Conference: Global Minds in Forensic Psychiatry—Advancing Research and Practice, Online, 24–25 April 2026.
Proceedings 2026, 150(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026150010
Published: 26 August 2026

Abstract

Background: Indirect measurement methods play a central role in the assessment of deviant sexual interests, including pedohebephilia. Among these approaches, eye-tracking paradigms that assess gaze behavior may serve as indirect indicators of deviant vs. non-deviant sexual interest. However, the diagnostic utility of eye-tracking measures for distinguishing pedohebephilia from sexual interest in adults (teleiophilia) remains unclear. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine differences in gaze behavior among individuals with pedohebephilic and teleiophilic sexual interest and to determine the extent to which eye-tracking measures can differentiate pedophilia and hebephilia from teleiophilia. Method: Gaze behavior was assessed using an eye tracker while images of children were presented alongside images of adults. Gaze measures included the time to first fixation, first fixation count and total duration of fixation. Sexual interest was determined through a clinical interview as part of a standard intake procedure of an outpatient prevention program. Results: The sample comprised men with pedophilia, hebephilia and a teleiophilic control group. Men with pedophilic sexual interest showed a significantly higher number of first fixations and a shorter time to first fixation on child stimuli compared with adult stimuli, while the teleiophilic group showed the opposite pattern. Findings for the hebephilic group were inconclusive. Total fixation duration was more evenly distributed between child and adult stimuli in the pedophilic group, whereas the other two groups showed longer fixation durations for adult stimuli [1]. Conclusions: The findings suggest that eye-tracking may provide a useful additional approach for assessing deviant sexual interest.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.H.; methodology, P.H.; software, P.H.; validation, P.H.; formal analysis, P.H.; investigation, P.H.; resources, P.H.; data curation, P.H.; writing—original draft preparation, P.H.; writing—review and editing, K.S.; visualization, P.H.; supervision, K.S.; project administration, K.S.; funding acquisition, K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Bavarian Ministry of Justice, Germany (“Bayerisches Staatsministerium der Justiz”).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU) Munich and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to ethical and data protection restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Reference

  1. Heindl, P.; Jordan, K.; Donhauser, T.; Schobel, S.; Löhrs, L.; Fischer, K.; Moussiopoulou, J.; Wertz, M.; Fromberger, P.; Müller, J.L.; et al. Gaze Behavior in Pedophilia and Hebephilia: How Task Instruction and Sexual Interest Shape Viewing of Prepubescent and Pubescent Stimuli. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2026; in press.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Heindl, P.; Schiltz, K. Gaze Behavior Towards Children in Pedophilia and Hebephilia. Proceedings 2026, 150, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026150010

AMA Style

Heindl P, Schiltz K. Gaze Behavior Towards Children in Pedophilia and Hebephilia. Proceedings. 2026; 150(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026150010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Heindl, Puyan, and Kolja Schiltz. 2026. "Gaze Behavior Towards Children in Pedophilia and Hebephilia" Proceedings 150, no. 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026150010

APA Style

Heindl, P., & Schiltz, K. (2026). Gaze Behavior Towards Children in Pedophilia and Hebephilia. Proceedings, 150(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026150010

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop