Abstract
This study presents the revision of the Rabaçal River Recreational Fishing Area Management Plan (ZPL), implemented in 2020, aiming to evaluate its effectiveness and identify the need for adjustments after five years. The study area includes part of Montesinho Natural Park, covering water bodies upstream of the Vale de Armeiro Reservoir (RH3—Douro Basin), excluding the Assureira River sub-basin. The methodology followed the initial study design, with electrofishing conducted at ten stations (30 surveys). Hydromorphological and riparian conditions were assessed using the River Habitat Survey (RHS), enabling the calculation of the Riparian Quality Index (RQI), Habitat Modification Score (HMS), and Habitat Quality Assessemt (HQA). Results indicate high habitat diversity and overall good-to-excellent hydromorphological quality, although they are locally affected by human pressures and global change. Brown trout (Salmo trutta) was recorded at all sites, showing wide spatial distribution. Population structure was dominated by young individuals (≤2 years; 70%), indicating high recruitment rates. However, growth patterns and reduced body condition suggest that habitat features, particularly flow regime and riparian quality, are influencing population dynamics, highlighting the need to explicitly integrate habitat–population relationships into management measures. A notable expansion of the invasive signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) was also observed (now present at stations T3, T4, and T5), reinforcing the need for targeted monitoring and control actions. Overall, the results support the continuation of the current management model, aligned with the conservation objectives defined in the initial plan and in project POSEUR-03-2215-FC-000096, while emphasizing the importance of habitat conservation to ensure the long-term sustainability of trout populations and aquatic ecosystems.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.M.; methodology, A.M. and S.V.; validation, A.M. and S.V.; formal analysis, A.M. and S.V.; investigation, A.M. and S.V.; resources, A.M.; data curation, A.M. and S.V.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.; writing—review and editing, A.M. and S.V.; visualisation, A.M. and S.V.; supervision, A.M. and S.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas, I.P.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.