Next Article in Journal
The 1st International Online Conference of the Journal Philosophies 
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Security as a Wide Concept in Sociology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review

by
Miguel Ribeiro
1,2,* and
Marco S. Lucas
1,3,*
1
Chemistry Research Centre-Vila Real (CQ-VR), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
2
Genetics and Biotechnology Department, School of Life Sciences and Environment, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
3
Chemistry Department, School of Life Sciences and Environment, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Proceedings 2025, 133(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025133008
Published: 23 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of II International Meeting Molecules 4 Life)
In submitting conference proceedings to Proceedings, the Volume Editors of the proceedings would like to certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review by the designated expert referees and were administered by the Volume Editors in strict accordance with the peer review policies established for this conference.
The whole process was supervised by the conference committee and the Volume Editors and adhered to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by MDPI and complied with the peer review policy and guidelines of Proceedings, which can be found at the following link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/proceedings/instruction_for_conference_organizers. The review reports were checked and archived by the Editorial Office of Proceedings.
  • Type of peer review: Single-blind.
  • Conference submission management system: All correspondence related to submissions and review processes was managed through email.
  • Number of submissions received: 10
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 10
  • Number of submissions accepted: 10
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 100%
  • Average number of reviews per paper: ~1.5
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 8
  • Description of the process of peer review and/or editorial oversight of all accepted content (e.g., detailed criteria or policy of peer-review, etc.): The papers have undergone a rigorous single-blind peer review, conducted by independent reviewers. These reviewers assessed various aspects, including scientific content, originality/novelty, quality of presentation, scientific soundness, interest to the readers, English proficiency, and overall merit.
The Conference Committee extends our heartfelt thanks to the dedicated reviewers whose expertise and commitment have been key to the II International Meeting Molecules4Life conference’s success.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ribeiro, M.; Lucas, M.S. Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings 2025, 133, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025133008

AMA Style

Ribeiro M, Lucas MS. Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings. 2025; 133(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025133008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ribeiro, Miguel, and Marco S. Lucas. 2025. "Statement of Peer Review" Proceedings 133, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025133008

APA Style

Ribeiro, M., & Lucas, M. S. (2025). Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings, 133(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025133008

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop