Statement of Peer Review
- Type of peer review: Single-blind.
- Conference submission management system: All correspondence related to submissions and review processes was managed through email.
- Number of submissions received: 10
- Number of submissions sent for review: 10
- Number of submissions accepted: 10
- Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 100%
- Average number of reviews per paper: ~1.5
- Total number of reviewers involved: 8
- Description of the process of peer review and/or editorial oversight of all accepted content (e.g., detailed criteria or policy of peer-review, etc.): The papers have undergone a rigorous single-blind peer review, conducted by independent reviewers. These reviewers assessed various aspects, including scientific content, originality/novelty, quality of presentation, scientific soundness, interest to the readers, English proficiency, and overall merit.
Conflicts of Interest
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ribeiro, M.; Lucas, M.S. Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings 2025, 133, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025133008
Ribeiro M, Lucas MS. Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings. 2025; 133(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025133008
Chicago/Turabian StyleRibeiro, Miguel, and Marco S. Lucas. 2025. "Statement of Peer Review" Proceedings 133, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025133008
APA StyleRibeiro, M., & Lucas, M. S. (2025). Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings, 133(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025133008

