Next Article in Journal
On the Pseudospectral Method for Solving the Fractional Klein–Gordon Equation Using Legendre Cardinal Functions
Next Article in Special Issue
Graph-Based Stock Volatility Forecasting with Effective Transfer Entropy and Hurst-Based Regime Adaptation
Previous Article in Journal
Fractal Characteristics of Wind Speed Time Series Under Typhoon Climate in Southeastern China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamic Black–Litterman Portfolios Incorporating Asymmetric Fractal Uncertainty
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Self-Similarity in Short and Long Movements of Crude Oil Prices by Combination of Stationary Wavelet Transform and Range-Scale Analysis: Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Russia-Ukraine War

1
Supply Chain and Business Technology Management Department, John Molson School of Business, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3H 0A1, Canada
2
Chaire Innovation et Économie Numérique, ESCA École de Management, Casablanca 20250, Morocco
Fractal Fract. 2025, 9(3), 176; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9030176
Submission received: 25 December 2024 / Revised: 27 February 2025 / Accepted: 10 March 2025 / Published: 14 March 2025

Abstract

This paper examines the self-similarity (long memory) in prices of crude oil markets, namely Brent and West Texas Instruments (WTI), by means of fractals. Specifically, price series are decomposed by stationary wavelet transform (SWT) to obtain their short and long oscillations. Then, the Hurst exponent is estimated from each resulting oscillation by rescaled analysis (R/S) to represent hidden fractals in the original price series. The analysis is performed during three periods: the calm period (before the COVID-19 pandemic), the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Russia-Ukraine war. In summary, prices of Brent and WTI exhibited significant increases in persistence in long movements during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war. In addition, they showed a significant increase in anti-persistence in short movements during the pandemic and a significant decrease in anti-persistence during the Russia-Ukraine war. It is concluded that both COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine war significantly affected long memory in the short and long movements of Brent and WTI prices.

1. Introduction

Crude oil is a strategic energy resource and is vital to any industry in the world. In this regard, crude oil has a significant impact on economic sectors, commodity markets, and financial markets. Over the decades, crude oil prices have undergone significant fluctuations due, for instance, to economic crises, oil supply and demand, international commercial inventory and exchange rates, international military conflicts, and speculative trading activities. In this regard, crude oil markets have attracted a large amount of attention from economic agents, investors, and scholars across the world. Therefore, investigating the dynamics of the crude oil market seems to be crucial and necessary.
On this subject, for instance, recent works in the literature examined the impact of crude oil price on global stock market volatility [1], the spillover relationships between international crude oil markets and global energy stock markets [2], impact of macroeconomic factors on volatility spillovers between stock, bond, gold and crude oil [3], dynamic linkages between crude oil futures, renewable energy indices, carbon credit futures and US sector market indices [4], spillover effects between oil and grain markets in response to supply- and demand-side shocks [5], relationship between investors’ attention to climate change risk and crude oil futures price returns [6], impact of the launching of crude oil futures in China on corporate risk management [7], effect of global economic and financial conditions on different oil supply-demand shocks [8], the relationships among crude oil and metal markets with respect to fluctuations in the US dollar (USD) [9], and study of the ex-ante selective hedging strategies of crude oil futures contracts [10].
Other studies focused on crude oil market prediction. For example, the comparison of 16 deep and machine learning models in forecasting the daily price and its direction of WTI, Brent, gold, and silver markets [11,12], the effect of global financial uncertainty on the prediction of crude oil price returns [13], the role of environment, society, and governance in forecasting returns [14], the role of ocean temperature in predicting crude oil prices [15], the effect of climate change on price forecasting [16], the role of investor’s fear in price volatility prediction [17], and the effectiveness of machine learning on price forecasting [18,19].
Another hot topic is about examining efficiency in the crude oil market according to the efficient market hypothesis that states that prices should follow a random walk [20]. In an early study, the authors in [21] examined the random walk hypothesis by using variance ratio tests for the Brent and WTI using daily data over the period 1982–2008 and found that the Brent crude oil market is weak-form efficient while the WTI crude oil market seems to be inefficient in the 1994–2008 sub-period. They concluded that deregulation had not improved the efficiency of the WTI crude oil market in the sense of making returns less predictable. In recent years, several works have been conducted from an econophysics perspective. For instance, the authors in [22] used the detrended fluctuation analysis for the Brent crude oil returns and found that there is a presence of long-range correlation in returns. In addition, it was concluded that after the financial crisis of 2008, the Brent crude oil market becomes more persistent. In [23], the R/S analysis and detrended fluctuation analysis were used to study the temporal properties of price shock sequences in crude oil markets, and empirical results showed that crude oil price shock sequences exhibit time-clustering behavior and long-range correlations. The authors in [24] applied the multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis and found that the WTI market shows multifractality. In addition, the sources of multifractality are from long-range correlations and fat-tailed distributions. Furthermore, the long-range correlation has a bigger impact. In [25], the presence of chaos in crude oil markets Brent and WTI was examined by estimating the largest Lyapunov exponent before and after the 2008 international financial crisis. Empirical results showed no evidence of chaos in prices and returns in Brent and WTI before and after the financial crisis. Yet, strong evidence of chaotic dynamics was found in the volatility of Brent and WTI after the financial crisis. By applying the detrended fluctuation analysis and the detrending moving average analysis techniques, the authors in [26] examined the efficiency of the WTI crude oil futures prices during the period of 1983–2012. They concluded that the WTI oil futures market is weak-form efficient during the entire period; however, it is inefficient right after the crashes (1985, 2008) and the Gulf War.
Very recently, some interesting studies have focused on examining the impact of extreme events like the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war on crude oil markets. For instance, estimated correlation dimension, Lyapunov exponent, and approximate entropy were estimated for periods before and during the pandemic to examine efficiency in WTI, Brent, natural gas, heating oil, and gasoline markets [27]. It was found that during the pandemic, stability strongly decreased in WTI, irregularity decreased in all markets, and heating oil and gasoline markets appear to be unaffected by the COVID-19 pandemic compared to WTI, Brent, and gas markets. In [28], it was concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected information transmission between fossil energy markets and altered the microstructure of fossil energy markets. The authors in [29] concluded that the WTI market was efficient most of the time in the years before the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it was not efficient in some major periods during the pandemic. In [30], the authors found that before the COVID-19 pandemic, the causal relationship predominantly flowed from gold and crude oil (Brent and WTI) toward the cryptocurrency markets. In contrast, during the COVID-19 period, the direction of causality shifted, with cryptocurrencies exerting influence on the gold and crude oil markets. The author in [31] examined multiscale fractals and entropy in fossil energy markets and found that all energy markets exhibit multifractal properties before and during the pandemic; multifractals intensified during the pandemic only in price returns of Brent, WTI, and gasoline markets, and multifractals decreased during the pandemic in price returns of the heating oil market. In addition, the analysis based on multiscale entropy showed strong evidence of a reduced irregularity in energy market price returns during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In addition, other scholars examined the impact of military conflicts like the Russia-Ukraine war on crude oil markets. For instance, it was found that the war affected speculation, amplified fluctuations in oil prices, intensified low inventories, and sustained an increase in oil prices [32]. However, it was concluded that the war had a small long-term effect on oil prices. In [33], the authors found evidence of the effect of the war on return spillovers across fossil energy markets and that Brent showed the highest dynamic gross directional return spillovers. The authors in [34] found that crude oil and equity markets were the major risk sources under COVID-19, while natural gas was the major risk source during the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The asymmetric effects of the war on energy, metal, and agricultural markets were examined by means of cross-quantilogram analysis in [35], and it was found that the war significantly affects metal, agricultural, and energy commodities. In [36], it was found that the war notably increased systemic risk in both the European gas and the Brent futures. In addition, the systemic risk increases quickly and reduces slowly in the gas market compared to Brent futures. Finally, during the war, the Brent futures market performed significantly and switched from the net transmitter to the net receiver from coal futures and natural gas [37].
According to the efficient markets hypothesis (EMH) [20], in a competitive market with rational, profit-maximizing agents, asset prices incorporate all available information. Therefore, asset prices are not predictable, and riskless profits cannot be generated by traders and investors [20]. In other words, market prices are efficient as they reflect all available information, so the price is a fair representation of asset value. In this regard, neither technical analysis (the study of historical prices to predict future prices) nor fundamental analysis (the study of fundamental data like financial and economic information) can be appropriate approaches to predicting prices of assets.
However, in complex economic systems, fractal theory provides a powerful tool for assessing the complex nonlinear properties of market price data. For instance, compared with the theory of EMH, the fractal market hypothesis (FMH) [38] is more helpful in explaining the complexity of financial and commodity markets. Indeed, Mandelbrot [39] showed that significant complexity in the financial market could be described by fractal theory. In this regard, based on the work of Mandelbrot [39] and using the fractal objects whose disparity parts are self-similar, Peters [38] proposed the FMH to explain variations and non-periodicity that describe stock markets.
In this paper, we aim to study self-similarity in short and long variations in Brent and WTI prices under three different periods: the regular period (before the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia-Ukraine war), the COVID-19 period, and the Russia-Ukraine war period. We make the hypothesis that such extreme events may alter self-similarity in the short and long movements of prices differently. For instance, short variations in prices would represent the immediate response to these extreme shocks, whilst long variations would represent the delayed response. In addition, the response would differ with the scale (short or long variation) and the type of extreme event.
In this work, short- and long-term variations used to describe sudden fluctuations and trends in original prices are extracted by means of stationary wavelet transform (SWT) [40] thanks to its effectiveness in signal representation, separation, detection, and filtering [41]. Specifically, unlike the traditional discrete wavelet transform, the SWT preserves more information after applying the transform. In this regard, it was successful in various problems, including examining chaos in exchange rates [42], clustering of international financial and commodity markets [43], short-term load forecasting for energy management [44], prediction of fault in electric distribution systems [45], and automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy [46]. Finally, self-similarity in short and long movements in prices of crude oil markets is assessed by the R/S fractal estimator of the Hurst exponent due to its effectiveness in various business [43,47] and engineering [48,49,50] problems. The main contributions of our study are as follows:
(a)
Self-similarity is examined in prices of two major crude oil markets, namely Brent and WTI.
(b)
The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war on self-similarity is examined. A calm period is considered a reference period.
(c)
We propose to combine SWT and R/S analysis to better analyze the data by estimating the Hurst exponent in the SWT domain.
(d)
Self-similarity is estimated from short and long movements in prices for better understanding of the dynamics of price series under different extreme events.
(e)
The recent literature [1,2,3,4,5] on crude oil markets is enriched by the effect of extreme events on self-similarity in short and long movements in prices of crude oil markets.
(f)
The study should provide traders and investors with insightful directions regarding investment in crude oil markets during times of major crises.
The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 introduces the SWT and R/S techniques. Section 3 describes the data and provides the empirical results. Section 4 discusses and concludes the work.

2. Materials and Methods

The flow chart of the proposed approach for the analysis of crude oil prices is shown in Figure 1. First, the price time series are decomposed by SWT to obtain details and approximation coefficients used to represent short and long (trend) movements (oscillations) in the original data. Then, the R/S analysis is applied to each category of coefficients to estimate the Hurst exponent (HE) and to reveal how fractals affect short and long oscillations. Therefore, a detailed analysis of nonlinear dynamics in price data can be achieved by applying the R/S in the SWT domain. Finally, the obtained Hurst exponent from detail and approximation coefficients can be interpreted. Specifically, the computed value of HE should be compared to 0.5. For instance, if HE is equal to 0.5, then price series obey a random process and cannot be predicted. If HE is less than 0.5, then price series are anti-persistent. In this regard, a decrease (increase) in price is most likely followed by an increase (decrease) in price. However, if HE is larger than 0.5, then price series are persistent. Accordingly, a decrease (increase) in price is most likely followed by a decrease (increase) in price. The SWT and R/S analyses are described next.

2.1. Stationary Wavelet Transform

The stationary wavelet transform (SWT) [40] is like the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) [51], where wavelet coefficients are obtained through the application of convolution followed by a decimation, but downsampling the scales is omitted. For instance, the SWT of a signal X is obtained by the convolution product of X and filters (low-pass followed by high-pass) that procures the approximation Cj,k and detail coefficients Wj,k sequentially at level j. Specifically, the approximation and detail coefficients are computed by applying two scale functions φk and Ψk in the time domain as expressed in Equations (1)–(4):
C j , k = X t φ k t
W j , k = X t Ψ k t
φ k t = 2 j φ 2 j t k
Ψ k t = 2 j Ψ 2 j t k
In this study, the Symlet-4 wavelet is chosen for the analysis of the data, and the level of decomposition is set to two.

2.2. R/S Analysis

The R/S analysis [52,53] is a commonly used fractal estimation method [43,47,48,49,50]. For instance, at a given scale n, the mean value of the signal X is computed as:
u ¯ n t = 1 n X = 1 n u x
The total accumulative deviation is expressed as follows:
u X , n = X = 1 n u x u ¯ n
The extreme difference R(n) is calculated as:
R n = max 1 X < n u X , n min 1 X < n u X , n
The standard deviation is given by:
S n = 1 n X = 1 n u x u ¯ n 2
Finally, based on the relationship R n / S n n H , the Hurst exponent H can be calculated by fitting a linear regression of log(n) on log(R(n)/S(n)).
If the signal X is characterized by long-range correlation features when it is not random. For instance, when 0 < H < 0.5, X is anti-persistent; so, a large (small) variation is more likely to be followed by a small (large) variation. When 0.5 < H < 1, X is persistent; so, a large (small) variation is more likely to be followed by a large (small) variation. Lastly, when H = 0.5, the dynamics of X follow a random walk, and X is difficult to predict. Recall that when H ≥ 1, the autocorrelation exists and ceases to be a power-law form.

3. Results

We collected daily price data on Brent and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) for the period from 2 January 2018 to 30 September 2024 from the Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) database of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, USA [54]. The full period is split into three subperiods: prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (2 January 2018 to 31 December 2019), the COVID-19 pandemic (2 January 2020 to 31 December 2021), and the Russia-Ukraine war (3 January 2022 to 30 September 2024). Figure 2 exhibits the approximation and detail coefficients of Brent and WTI through the full sample. The estimated values of the Hurst exponent used to represent self-similarity in approximation (long trend movements or general trend) and detail (short movements) coefficients are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4.
As shown in Figure 3, the detail coefficients used to represent short movements in prices of Brent are anti-persistent during all periods. In addition, the approximation coefficients used to represent long movements (trend) in prices of Brent are persistent during all periods. In addition, for Brent prices, anti-persistence in short movements increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and decreased during the Russia-Ukraine war. Similarly, persistence in long movements increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and decreased during the Russia-Ukraine war. Furthermore, the Hurst exponent in short movements during the war is lower than that in the calm period. Thus, short movements in Brent prices are less anti-persistent during the war compared to the calm and pandemic periods.
As shown in Figure 4, the detail coefficients corresponding to short movements in prices of WTI are anti-persistent in all periods. In addition, the approximation coefficients corresponding to long movements (trend) in prices of WTI are persistent in all periods. As well, for WTI prices, anti-persistence in short movements raised during the COVID-19 pandemic and reduced during the Russia-Ukraine war. Likewise, persistence in long movements intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic and diminished during the Russia-Ukraine war. Also, the Hurst exponent in short movements during the war is lower than that in the calm period. Hence, short movements in WTI prices are less anti-persistent during the war compared to the calm and pandemic periods.
In summary, prices of Brent and WTI exhibited significant increases in persistence in long movements during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war. In addition, they showed a significant increase in anti-persistence in short movements during the pandemic and a significant decrease in anti-persistence during the Russia-Ukraine war.
For further analysis, Table 1 provides the percentage rate of change in the Hurst exponent between two successive periods. As indicated, the rate of change in the Hurst exponent of long movements from the calm to the pandemic period is 9% for Brent and 12% for WTI. Then, the response of WTI to the pandemic is more pronounced than the response of Brent. In addition, the rate of change in the Hurst exponent of short movements from the calm to the pandemic period is 13% for both Brent and WTI. Therefore, the response of short movements in Brent and WTI to the pandemic is similar and higher compared to short movements. More importantly, the pandemic strongly affected self-similarity in short movements of Brent compared to its long movements: 9% versus 13%.
In addition, the rate of change in the Hurst exponent of long movements from the pandemic to the Russia-Ukraine war is −5% for both Brent and WTI. This finding suggests that the effect of the war on the self-similarity of long movements is similar across prices of Brent and WTI. In addition, the rate of change in the Hurst exponent in price short movements from the pandemic to the war period is −38% for Brent and −16% for WTI. Hence, the effect of the war is stronger on short movements than on long movements. Furthermore, the war period strongly affected self-similarity in short movements of Brent compared to short movements in WTI: −38% versus −16%. It is worth mentioning that the rate of change in the Hurst exponent is always negative during the war period.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

Crude oil plays a major role in the world economy and development. The occurrence of extreme events like the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war has significantly altered the connectedness between energy markets on one hand and energy markets and commodity markets on the other hand [27,28,29,30,31]. The main purpose of the current study is to examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia-Ukraine on self-similarity (long memory) in prices of Brent and WTI. We proposed employing SWT to extract short and long movements in price series, followed by the estimation of the Hurst exponent by R/S analysis. The estimated Hurst exponent is used to assess self-similarity in short and long movements in prices. The empirical results follow. First, prices of Brent and WTI exhibited significant increases in persistence in long movements during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war. Second, prices of Brent and WTI showed a significant increase in anti-persistence in short movements during the pandemic and a significant decrease in anti-persistence during the Russia-Ukraine war.
To sum up, these two extreme events have affected long memory in prices of Brent and WTI. In this regard, our findings confirm previous works [27,28,29,30,31] used to show that the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia-Ukraine war affected crude oil markets. For instance, it was found that the Russia-Ukraine war affected speculation and amplified fluctuations in oil prices [32], caused global energy market shocks [33], and the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine military conflict altered stability in connectedness between various commodity markets, including Brent and WTI, and the effect of the pandemic is stronger [34]. In addition, the Russia-Ukraine war significantly affected asymmetric bi-directional predictability between energy commodities [35], and it significantly increased systemic risk in both the European gas and oil markets [36]. Furthermore, because of the war, oil markets dominated the transmission of returns spillovers among traditional/new energy, green finance, and corporates’ environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and changed from the net transmitter to the net receiver. In this regard, our findings are in accordance with previous works that showed that the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war significantly affected energy commodities, as can be seen in Table 2, used to summarize some of the recent works on the topic. Indeed, as extreme events, both the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war affected the short and long movements in prices of Brent and WTI. These results were revealed thanks to the decomposition of their respective prices by STW into short and long variations and applying the R/S analysis into the decomposed series as proposed in Figure 1.
It is intriguing that anti-persistence in short movements of Brent and WTI prices during the Russia-Ukraine war is less than that during the calm period. Indeed, anti-persistence increased during the pandemic period and decreased during the war. More importantly, the value in the war period is less than the value recorded during the calm period. This situation could reflect a moment of panic in crude oil markets (Brent and WTI), where a large increase in prices is followed by a large decrease and vice versa.
In addition, as shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, the persistence in both long (approximation) and short (detail) movements of prices in Brent and WTI has slightly decreased in the post-COVID-19 pandemic period as compared with the pandemic period. This could be explained by the fact that the world economy started recovering from the crisis caused by the pandemic.
In addition, based on empirical findings, both short and long variations in prices of Brent and WTI are predictable as their respective Hurst exponents are significantly not close to 0.5 in all periods. Specifically, to generate profits, long-term investors may look at trends of price and expect that a large (small) variation in trend is more likely to be followed by a large (small) variation. In contrast, to generate profits, short-term traders may look at sudden changes in prices and expect that a large (small) variation in price is more likely to be followed by a small (large) variation.
Indeed, empirical results would help investors, traders, and risk managers in the crude oil industry (i) in understanding the impact of extreme events like pandemics and geopolitical risks on crude oil prices (ii) and in providing central inputs for asset allocation and hedging strategies with respect to Brent and WTI, the major crude oil markets in the West.
In addition, revealing differences in predictability in short and long movements of crude oil prices during normal and stressful periods is timely and serves as a useful tool for policymakers and market regulators. For instance, the comparative analysis of long memory in short and long variations in crude oil prices is supposed to offer groundbreaking evidence to assess the market correctly. Specifically, as short movements are anti-persistent and long movements are persistent, policymakers and market regulators may set specific strategies to avoid the misallocation of resources that would have a negative impact on short- and long-term economic growth. Likewise, revealing differences in predictability in short and long movements of crude oil prices during normal and stressful periods would help to improve the efficiency of resource allocation channels across calm and extreme periods and reduce distortions in the economy in the short and long run. In summary, our findings may be of some use to investors and policymakers who are struggling to minimize the impacts of global and regional extreme events. In particular, for both Brent and WTI, policymakers such as government and regulators should expect that long-term movements in prices will follow the same trend during extreme events as an increase (decrease) in price is most likely to be followed by an increase (decrease). For instance, if crude oil prices increase during the extreme event period, they will keep increasing, and policymakers are expected to increase the budget used to buy crude oil accordingly. On the other hand, if crude oil prices decrease during the extreme event period, they will keep decreasing; hence, policymakers are expected to decrease the budget used to buy crude oil accordingly. In addition, for both Brent and WTI, traders and investors who are interested in maximizing short-term profits should expect that short-term movements in prices will change direction frequently during extreme events like the pandemic and geopolitical risks or wars. For instance, if crude oil prices increase (decrease) during the extreme event period, they will decrease (increase) the next day. Thus, on a daily basis, traders and investors are expected to sell (buy) crude oil when the price increases (decreases) to generate profits, as price increases (decreases) aremost likely to be followed by a price decrease (increase) the next day. Therefore, trading crude oil daily would increase profits of traders and investors during extreme periods.
In future works, we will implement multivariate rescaled range analysis [55] to better understand the Brent–WTI complex system being studied. Hence, one could scrutinize the co-movements among the component series (for instance, Brent and WTI) to highlight the latent effects on stability and forecasting.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data can be obtained from reference [54].

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yin, L.; Cao, H.; Xin, Y. Impact of crude oil price innovations on global stock market volatility: Evidence across time and space. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2024, 96 Pt B, 103685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, X.; Yang, S.; Luo, K.; Liang, C. Spillover relationships between international crude oil markets and global energy stock markets under the influence of geopolitical risks: New evidence. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2024, 96 Pt A, 103547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, Y.; Guan, B.; Lu, W.; Heravi, S. Macroeconomic shocks and volatility spillovers between stock, bond, gold and crude oil markets. Energy Econ. 2024, 136, 107750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Koczar, M.W.; Jareño, F.; Escribano, A. Dynamic linkages and contagion effects: Analyzing the linkages between crude oil prices, US market sector indices and energy markets. N. Am. J. Econ. Financ. 2024, 74, 102247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ni, G.; Hadj Cherif, H.; Chen, Z. Measuring dynamic spillovers between crude oil and grain commodity markets: A comparative analysis of demand and supply shocks. Financ. Res. Lett. 2024, 67 Pt A, 105748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lin, B.; Chen, Y.; Gong, X. Stress from attention: The relationship between climate change attention and crude oil markets. J. Commod. Mark. 2024, 34, 100399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. He, F.; Chen, L.; Hao, J.; Wu, J. Financial market development and corporate risk management: Evidence from Shanghai crude oil futures launched in China. Energy Econ. 2024, 129, 107250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hong, Y.; Cao, S.; Xu, P.; Pan, Z. Interpreting the effect of global economic risks on crude oil market: A supply-demand perspective. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2024, 91, 103008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zolfaghari, M. How does US tariff policy affect the relationship among crude oil, the US dollar and metal markets? Resour. Policy 2023, 85 Pt B, 103876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, X.; Shen, X.; Li, Y.; Gong, X. Selective hedging strategies for crude oil futures based on market state expectations. Glob. Financ. J. 2023, 57, 100845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Foroutan, P.; Lahmiri, S. Deep learning systems for forecasting the prices of crude oil and precious metals. Financ. Innov. 2024, 10, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Foroutan, P.; Lahmiri, S. Deep learning-based spatial-temporal graph neural networks for price movement classification in crude oil and precious metal markets. Mach. Learn. Appl. 2024, 16, 100552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ma, Y.; Li, S.; Zhou, M. Forecasting crude oil prices: Does global financial uncertainty matter? Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2024, 96 Pt C, 103723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, K.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Forecasting crude oil returns with oil-related industry ESG indices. J. Commod. Mark. 2024, 36, 100444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. He, M.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y. Forecasting crude oil prices with global ocean temperatures. Energy 2024, 311, 133341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cheng, Z.; Li, M.; Sun, Y.; Hong, Y.; Wang, S. Climate change and crude oil prices: An interval forecast model with interval-valued textual data. Energy Econ. 2024, 134, 107612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Haukvik, N.; Cheraghali, H.; Molnár, P. The role of investors’ fear in crude oil volatility forecasting. Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 2024, 70 Pt B, 102353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lahmiri, S. Fossil energy market price prediction by using machine learning with optimal hyper-parameters: A comparative study. Resour. Policy 2024, 92, 105008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dong, Y.; Jiang, H.; Guo, Y.; Wang, J. A novel crude oil price forecasting model using decomposition and deep learning networks. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2024, 133 Pt A, 108111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fama, E.F. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. J. Financ. 1970, 25, 383–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Charles, A.; Darné, O. The efficiency of the crude oil markets: Evidence from variance ratio tests. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 4267–4272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yuan, Y.; Zhuang, X.-T.; Jin, X.; Huang, W.-Q. Stable distribution and long-range correlation of Brent crude oil market. Phys. A 2014, 413, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yuan, Y.; Zhuang, X.-T.; Liu, Z.-Y.; Huang, W.-Q. Analysis of the temporal properties of price shock sequences in crude oil markets. Phys. A 2014, 394, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yao, C.-Z.; Liu, C.; Ju, W.J. Multifractal analysis of the WTI crude oil market, US stock market and EPU. Phys. A 2020, 550, 124096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lahmiri, S. A study on chaos in crude oil markets before and after 2008 international financial crisis. Phys. A 2017, 466, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiang, Z.-Q.; Xie, W.-J.; Zhou, W.-X. Testing the weak-form efficiency of the WTI crude oil futures market. Phys. A 2014, 405, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lahmiri, S. Price disorder and information content in energy and gold markets: The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. Energy Nexus 2024, 16, 100343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lahmiri, S. The nexus between fossil energy markets and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on clustering structures. Energy Nexus 2024, 16, 100344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Espinosa-Paredes, G.; Rodriguez, E.; Alvarez-Ramirez, J. A singular value decomposition entropy approach to assess the impact of Covid-19 on the informational efficiency of the WTI crude oil market. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2022, 160, 112238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Foroutan, P.; Lahmiri, S. Connectedness of cryptocurrency markets to crude oil and gold: An analysis of the effect of COVID-19 pandemic. Financ. Innov. 2024, 10, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lahmiri, S. Multifractals and multiscale entropy patterns in energy markets under the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. Decis. Anal. J. 2023, 7, 100247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, Q.; Yang, K.; Hu, Y.; Jiao, J.; Wang, S. Unveiling the impact of geopolitical conflict on oil prices: A case study of the Russia-Ukraine War and its channels. Energy Econ. 2023, 126, 106956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kayani, U.; Hasnaoui, A.; Khan, M.; Zahoor, N.; Nawaz, F. Analyzing fossil fuel commodities’ return spillovers during the Russia and Ukraine crisis in the energy market. Energy Econ. 2024, 135, 107651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guo, X.; Lu, X.; Mu, S.; Zhang, M. New roles for energy and financial markets in spillover connections: Context under COVID-19 and the Russia–Ukraine conflict. Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 2024, 71, 102403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chishti, M.Z.; Khalid, A.A.; Sana, M. Conflict vs sustainability of global energy, agricultural and metal markets: A lesson from Ukraine-Russia war. Resour. Policy 2023, 84, 103775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhou, E.; Wang, X. Dynamics of systemic risk in European gas and oil markets under the Russia–Ukraine conflict: A quantile regression neural network approach. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 3956–3966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, W.; Dong, L.; Chen, Y. Time-frequency connectedness among traditional/new energy, green finance, and ESG in pre- and post-Russia-Ukraine war periods. Resour. Policy 2023, 83, 103618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Peters, E.E. Fractal Market Analysis: Applying Chaos Theory to Investment and Economics; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mandelbrot, B.B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature; Freeman: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  40. Nason, G.P.; Silverman, B.W. The stationary wavelet transform and some statistical applications. In Wavelets and Statistics; Antoniadis, A., Oppenheim, G., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1995; Volume 103, pp. 281–299. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, X.H.; Istepanian, R.S.H. Microarray image enhancement by denoising using stationary wavelet transform. IEEE Trans. NanoBioscience 2003, 2, 184–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lahmiri, S. Investigating existence of chaos in short and long term dynamics of Moroccan exchange rates. Phys. A 2017, 465, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lahmiri, S.; Salah Uddin, G.; Bekiros, S. Clustering of short and long-term co-movements in international financial and commodity markets in wavelet domain. Phys. A 2017, 486, 947–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tayab, U.B.; Zia, A.; Yang, F.; Lu, J.; Kashif, M. Short-term load forecasting for microgrid energy management system using hybrid HHO-FNN model with best-basis stationary wavelet packet transform. Energy 2020, 203, 117857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Leal, M.M.; Bezerra Costa, F.; Loureiro Sousa Campos, J.T. Improved traditional directional protection by using the stationary wavelet transform. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2019, 105, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Özçelik, Y.B.; Altan, A. Overcoming nonlinear dynamics in diabetic retinopathy classification: A robust AI-based model with chaotic swarm intelligence optimization and recurrent long short-term memory. Fractal Fract. 2023, 7, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lu, K.-C.; Chen, K.-S. Uncovering information linkages between Bitcoin, sustainable finance and the impact of COVID-19: Fractal and entropy analysis. Fractal Fract. 2023, 7, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lahmiri, S. Long memory in international financial markets trends and short movements during 2008 financial crisis based on variational mode decomposition and detrended fluctuation analysis. Phys. A 2015, 437, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gospodinova, E.; Lebamovski, P.; Georgieva-Tsaneva, G.; Negreva, M. Evaluation of the methods for nonlinear analysis of heart rate variability. Fractal Fract. 2023, 7, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bildirici, M.; Ucan, Y.; Tekercioglu, R. A hybrid approach combining the lie method and long short-term memory (LSTM) network for predicting the Bitcoin return. Fractal Fract. 2024, 8, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Akansu, A.N.; Haddad, R.A. Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: Transforms, Subbands, and Wavelets; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hurst, H.E. Long term storage capacity of reservoirs. Trans. Am. Soc. Eng. 1951, 116, 770–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Peng, C.K.; Buldyrev, S.V.; Havlin, S.; Simons, M.; Stanley, H.E.; Goldberger, A.L. Mosaic organization of DNA nucleotides. Phys. Rev. 1994, E 49, 1685–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Available online: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/ (accessed on 31 October 2024).
  55. Meraz, M.; Alvarez-Ramirez, J.; Rodriguez, E. Multivariate rescaled range analysis. Phys. A 2022, 589, 126631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Estimation of the Hurst exponent in the SWT domain to evaluate self-similarity in short- and long-term movements of crude oil prices. Detail and approximation coefficients, respectively, represent the short and long movements in crude oil prices. For each type of movement, if HE is equal to 0.5, then price series obey a random process and cannot be predicted. If HE is less than 0.5, then price series are anti-persistent. In this regard, a decrease (increase) in price is most likely followed by an increase (decrease) in price. However, if HE is larger than 0.5, then price series are persistent. Accordingly, a decrease (increase) in price is most likely followed by a decrease (increase) in price.
Figure 1. Estimation of the Hurst exponent in the SWT domain to evaluate self-similarity in short- and long-term movements of crude oil prices. Detail and approximation coefficients, respectively, represent the short and long movements in crude oil prices. For each type of movement, if HE is equal to 0.5, then price series obey a random process and cannot be predicted. If HE is less than 0.5, then price series are anti-persistent. In this regard, a decrease (increase) in price is most likely followed by an increase (decrease) in price. However, if HE is larger than 0.5, then price series are persistent. Accordingly, a decrease (increase) in price is most likely followed by a decrease (increase) in price.
Fractalfract 09 00176 g001
Figure 2. Representations of short and long movements obtained by SWT in prices of Brent and WTI on the full sample.
Figure 2. Representations of short and long movements obtained by SWT in prices of Brent and WTI on the full sample.
Fractalfract 09 00176 g002
Figure 3. Values of estimated Hurst exponent (on y-axis) estimated from Brent prices across calm, pandemic, and Russia-Ukraine war periods. Short- and long-term movements are, respectively, represented by approximation and detail coefficients.
Figure 3. Values of estimated Hurst exponent (on y-axis) estimated from Brent prices across calm, pandemic, and Russia-Ukraine war periods. Short- and long-term movements are, respectively, represented by approximation and detail coefficients.
Fractalfract 09 00176 g003
Figure 4. Values of estimated Hurst exponent (on y-axis) estimated from WTI prices across calm, pandemic, and Russia-Ukraine war periods. Short- and long-term movements are, respectively, represented by approximation and detail coefficients.
Figure 4. Values of estimated Hurst exponent (on y-axis) estimated from WTI prices across calm, pandemic, and Russia-Ukraine war periods. Short- and long-term movements are, respectively, represented by approximation and detail coefficients.
Fractalfract 09 00176 g004
Table 1. Rate of change in the Hurst exponent as measured by the R/S technique across.
Table 1. Rate of change in the Hurst exponent as measured by the R/S technique across.
Brent MovementsWTI Movements
Long ShortLongShort
Periods
Calm0.93390.27260.90240.3032
Pandemic1.02230.30941.00620.342
War0.97560.19310.95570.2875
Change rate
Calm–pandemic9%13%12%13%
Pandemic–war−5%−38%−5%−16%
Table 2. Summary of comparison with previous works on the same topic.
Table 2. Summary of comparison with previous works on the same topic.
StudyPurposePeriodFindings
[21]Examine the random walk hypothesis in Brent and WTI returns. June 1982 to July 2008The Brent crude oil market is weak-form efficient, while the WTI crude oil market seems to be inefficient in the 1994–2008 sub-period.
[22]Examine long-range correlation in Brent returns. May 1987 to September 2012Presence of long-range correlation in returns. After the financial crisis of 2008, the Brent crude oil market becomes more persistent.
[23]Examine long-range correlation in Brent and WTI returns.May 1987 to September 2012Crude oil price shock sequences exhibit long-range correlations.
[24]Examine multifractal in WTIApr 1986 to June 2018The WTI market shows multifractality. Sources of multifractality are from long-range correlations and fat-tailed distributions.
[25]Examine chaos in Brent and WTINovember 1998 to March 2016No evidence of chaos in prices and returns in Brent and WTI before and after the financial crisis. Strong evidence of chaos in the volatility of Brent and WTI after the financial crisis.
[26]Examine long memory in WTI crude oil futuresApril 1983 to October 2012The WTI oil futures market is weak-form efficient during the entire period. It is inefficient right after the crashes (1985, 2008) and the Gulf War.
[27]Examine correlation dimension, Lyapunov exponent, and approximate entropy for the periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brent and WTI, among others. November 2017 to November 2022The COVID-19 pandemic affected WTI, Brent, and gas markets.
[28] Investigate causality between international fossil energy markets and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on their clustering structures.August 1993 to June 2023The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected information transmission between fossil energy markets and altered the microstructure of fossil energy markets.
[29]Investigate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on crude oil market efficiency.January 2000 to April 2022The WTI market was efficient most of the time in the years before the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it was not efficient in some major periods during the pandemic.
[30] Investigate the connectedness between the 10 most traded cryptocurrencies and gold as well as crude oil markets pre-COVID-19 and during COVID-19.January 2019 to December 2020Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the causal relationship predominantly flowed from gold and crude oil (Brent and WTI) toward the cryptocurrency markets. During the COVID-19 period, the direction of causality shifted, with cryptocurrencies exerting influence on the gold and crude oil markets.
[31]Examine multiscale fractals and entropy in fossil energy markets.November 2017 to November 2022The COVID-19 pandemic affected multifractal behavior and multiscale entropy characteristics in WTI, Brent, gasoline, and heating oil markets.
Our studyTo decompose price time series of Brent and WTI by SWT to obtain their corresponding long and short movements. To estimate long memory in the decomposed series for better characterization and understanding of their dynamics.January 2018 to September 2024Both COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine war significantly affected long memory in the short and long movements of Brent and WTI prices.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lahmiri, S. Analysis of Self-Similarity in Short and Long Movements of Crude Oil Prices by Combination of Stationary Wavelet Transform and Range-Scale Analysis: Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Russia-Ukraine War. Fractal Fract. 2025, 9, 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9030176

AMA Style

Lahmiri S. Analysis of Self-Similarity in Short and Long Movements of Crude Oil Prices by Combination of Stationary Wavelet Transform and Range-Scale Analysis: Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Russia-Ukraine War. Fractal and Fractional. 2025; 9(3):176. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9030176

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lahmiri, Salim. 2025. "Analysis of Self-Similarity in Short and Long Movements of Crude Oil Prices by Combination of Stationary Wavelet Transform and Range-Scale Analysis: Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Russia-Ukraine War" Fractal and Fractional 9, no. 3: 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9030176

APA Style

Lahmiri, S. (2025). Analysis of Self-Similarity in Short and Long Movements of Crude Oil Prices by Combination of Stationary Wavelet Transform and Range-Scale Analysis: Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Russia-Ukraine War. Fractal and Fractional, 9(3), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9030176

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop