Next Article in Journal
Dynamics and Complexity Analysis of Fractional-Order Inventory Management System Model
Previous Article in Journal
Event-Triggered Adaptive Neural Network Control for State-Constrained Pure-Feedback Fractional-Order Nonlinear Systems with Input Delay and Saturation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Some Properties of Normalized Tails of Maclaurin Power Series Expansions of Sine and Cosine

1
School of Mathematics and Information Science, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
2
Department of Science and Technology, State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Company Research Institute, Hangzhou 310014, China
3
School of Mathematics and Informatics, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454010, China
4
School of Mathematics and Physics, Hulunbuir University, Hulunbuir 021008, China
5
Independent Researcher, University Village, Dallas, TX 75252, USA
6
Department of Mathematics, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung 82444, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fractal Fract. 2024, 8(5), 257; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8050257
Submission received: 13 March 2024 / Revised: 18 April 2024 / Accepted: 24 April 2024 / Published: 26 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section General Mathematics, Analysis)

Abstract

:
In the paper, the authors introduce two notions, the normalized remainders, or say, the normalized tails, of the Maclaurin power series expansions of the sine and cosine functions, derive two integral representations of the normalized tails, prove the nonnegativity, positivity, decreasing property, and concavity of the normalized tails, compute several special values of the Young function, the Lommel function, and a generalized hypergeometric function, recover two inequalities for the tails of the Maclaurin power series expansions of the sine and cosine functions, propose three open problems about the nonnegativity, positivity, decreasing property, and concavity of a newly introduced function which is a generalization of the normalized tails of the Maclaurin power series expansions of the sine and cosine functions. These results are related to the Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals.

1. Motivations and Preliminaries

It is well known ([1], p. 649) that
sin x = k = 0 ( 1 ) k x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! = x x 3 6 + x 5 120 x 7 5040 + , x R
and
cos x = k = 0 ( 1 ) k x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! = 1 x 2 2 + x 4 24 x 6 720 + x 8 40320 , x R .
For our own convenience, we denote the tails, or say, the remainders, of the power series expansions (1) and (2) by
SR n ( x ) = sin x k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! = ( 1 ) n x 2 n + 1 k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 n + 2 k + 1 ) ! x 2 k
and
CR n ( x ) = cos x k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! = ( 1 ) n x 2 n k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 n + 2 k ) ! x 2 k
for n 1 and x R , respectively. By virtue of (Theorem 7.6 of [2]) or in view of the results at the site https://math.stackexchange.com/a/477549 (accessed on 8 March 2024), we acquire the integral representations
SR n ( x ) = ( 1 ) n ( 2 n 1 ) ! 0 x ( x t ) 2 n 1 sin t   d t
and
CR n ( x ) = ( 1 ) n ( 2 n 2 ) ! 0 x ( x t ) 2 n 2 sin t   d t
for n 1 and x R .
It is known (Chapter XIII of [3]) that
R μ { f ( x ) ; y } = 1 Γ ( μ ) 0 y f ( x ) ( y x ) μ 1 d x
is called the Riemann–Liouville fractional integral of order μ , where the classical Euler gamma function Γ ( μ ) is defined (Chapter 3 of [4]) by
Γ ( μ ) = lim n n ! n μ k = 0 n ( μ + k ) , μ C { 0 , 1 , 2 , } ,
whose reciprocal 1 Γ ( z ) is an entire function on the complex plane C ; see also (Section 1 of [5]). In (Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.5 of [6]), Koumandos proved that the function
F λ ( x ) = Γ ( λ + 1 ) R λ + 1 { sin t ; x } = 0 x ( x t ) λ sin t   d t
is logarithmically concave in x ( 0 , ) if and only if λ 2 and that for all μ 1 the inequality
1 + 1 μ F μ 2 ( x ) F μ 1 ( x ) F μ + 1 ( x ) 0
is valid for all x > 0 and that the equality in (9) occurs only when μ = 1 and tan x 2 = x 2 .
It is well known ([7], pp. 322 and 326) that, for n 1 and x R ,
| SR n ( x ) | | x | 2 n + 1 ( 2 n + 1 ) ! , | CR n ( x ) | | x | 2 n ( 2 n ) ! ,
and
( 1 ) n x SR n ( x ) 0 , ( 1 ) n CR n ( x ) 0 .
In (Corollaries 1.3 and 1.4 of [6]), Koumandos gave that the functions ( 1 ) n + 1 SR n + 1 ( x ) and ( 1 ) n + 1 CR n + 1 ( x ) for n N are positive, increasing, logarithmically concave, and convex on ( 0 , ) and that the ratios
CR n + 1 ( x ) SR n + 1 ( x ) , CR n ( x ) CR n + 1 ( x ) , SR n ( x ) SR n + 1 ( x )
for n N are decreasing on ( 0 , ) .
In the papers [8,9,10], Qi and his coauthors considered the following functions and problems:
  • What are the Maclaurin power series expansions of the logarithmic functions
    F ( x ) = { ln 2 ( 1 cos x ) x 2 , 0 < | x | < 2 π 0 , x = 0
    and
    Q ( x ) = { ln 6 ( x sin x ) x 3 , 0 < | x | < 0 , x = 0
    around x = 0 ?
  • Are the ratios
    R ( x ) = { ln 2 ( 1 cos x ) x 2 ln cos x , 0 < | x | < π 2 1 6 , x = 0 0 , x = ± π 2
    and
    T ( x ) = { ln 6 ( x sin x ) x 3 ln sin x x , 0 < | x | < π 3 10 , x = 0 0 , x = ± π
    decreasing on the close intervals 0 , π 2 and [ 0 , π ] respectively?
Stimulated by main results in the papers [6,8,9,10] and motivated by the four functions in (12)–(15), we now introduce two new functions SinR n ( x ) and CosR n ( x ) by
SinR n ( x ) = { ( 1 ) n ( 2 n + 1 ) ! x 2 n + 1 sin x k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! , x 0 1 , x = 0
and
CosR n ( x ) = { ( 1 ) n ( 2 n ) ! x 2 n cos x k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! , x 0 1 , x = 0
for n 1 and x R . We call the quantities SinR n ( x ) and CosR n ( x ) for n 1 the nth normalized tails or the normalized remainders of the Maclaurin power series expansions (1) and (2).
Making use of the series expansions (3) and (4), we derive
SinR n ( x ) = { ( 1 ) n ( 2 n + 1 ) ! x 2 n + 1 SR n ( x ) , x 0 1 , x = 0 = ( 2 n + 1 ) ! k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 n + 2 k + 1 ) ! x 2 k
and
CosR n ( x ) = { ( 1 ) n ( 2 n ) ! x 2 n CR n ( x ) , x 0 1 , x = 0 = ( 2 n ) ! k = 0 ( 1 ) k x 2 k ( 2 n + 2 k ) !
for n 1 and x R . Utilizing the integral representations (5) and (6), we acquire
SinR n ( x ) = { 2 n ( 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 u ) 2 n 1 sin ( x u ) x d u , x 0 1 , x = 0 = ( 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 u ) 2 n cos ( x u ) d u
and
CosR n ( x ) = { 2 n ( 2 n 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 u ) 2 n 2 sin ( x u ) x d u , x 0 1 , x = 0 = 2 n 0 1 ( 1 u ) 2 n 1 cos ( x u ) d u
for n 1 and x R .
It is obvious that both of the normalized tails SinR n ( x ) and CosR n ( x ) for n 1 are even functions in x ( , ) .
Combining two inequalities in (11) with the first equalities in (18) and (19) reveals that both of the normalized tails SinR n ( x ) and CosR n ( x ) for n 1 are nonnegative in x ( 0 , ) .
In this paper, among other things, we will mainly prove that the normalized tail SinR n ( x ) for n 1 and the normalized tail CosR n ( x ) for n 2 are decreasing in x ( 0 , ) and concave in x ( 0 , π ) .

2. Decreasing Property and Concavity of SinR n ( x )

In this section, we will prove the decreasing property and concavity of the even function SinR n ( x ) for n 1 .
Theorem 1.
For n 1 , the normalized remainder SinR n ( x ) is decreasing and positive in x ( 0 , ) , while it is concave in x ( 0 , π ) .
Proof. 
Employing the first expression in (18) and directly differentiating yield
SinR n ( x ) = x SR n ( x ) ( 2 n + 1 ) SR n ( x ) x 2 n + 2 = ( 1 ) n ( 2 n + 1 ) ! x 2 n + 2 S n ( x )
for n 1 and x 0 , where
S n ( x ) = x cos x ( 2 n + 1 ) sin x + k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k 2 ( n k ) ( 2 k + 1 ) ! x 2 k + 1
for n 1 and x R . A straightforward differentiation gives
S n ( j ) ( x ) = x cos x + j π 2 ( 2 n j + 1 ) sin x + j π 2 + k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k 2 ( n k ) ( 2 k + 1 ) ! 2 k + 1 j x 2 k j + 1
for j 0 , where
z n = Γ ( z + 1 ) Γ ( z n + 1 ) = k = 0 n 1 ( z k ) = z ( z 1 ) ( z n + 1 ) , n N 1 , n = 0
is known ([11], p. 6) as the nth falling factorial of z C . In particular,
S n ( 2 n 2 ) ( x ) = ( 1 ) n + 1 ( x cos x + 2 x 3 sin x ) = ( 1 ) n + 1 3 x 2 + cos x 3 sin x x
for n 1 . Since the inequality
sin x x < 2 + cos x 3 , x ( 0 , ) ( 0 , π )
is valid, see ([12], Lemma 4), we acquire
( 1 ) n + 1 S n ( 2 n 2 ) ( x ) = 3 x 2 + cos x 3 sin x x > 0
for x > 0 and n 1 . It is not difficult to see that S n ( j ) ( 0 ) = 0 for 0 j 2 n 2 . Therefore, it follows that ( 1 ) n + 1 S n ( j ) ( x ) > 0 for 0 j 2 n 2 and x > 0 . Hence, the derivative SinR n ( x ) < 0 for n 1 on ( 0 , ) . Accordingly, the even function SinR n ( x ) for n 1 is decreasing on ( 0 , ) .
From the first expression in (20), we deduce the limit
lim x SinR n ( x ) = 0 , n 1 .
Combining this with the decreasing property of SinR n ( x ) for n 1 on ( 0 , ) , we conclude that the function SinR n ( x ) for n 1 is positive on ( 0 , ) .
Straightforward computation gives
SinR n ( x ) = ( 1 ) n ( 2 n + 1 ) ! x SR n ( x ) ( 2 n + 1 ) SR n ( x ) x 2 n + 2 = ( 1 ) n ( 2 n + 1 ) ! S n ( x ) x 2 n + 2 , SinR n ( x ) = ( 1 ) n ( 2 n + 1 ) ! Φ n ( x ) x 2 n + 3 ,
where
Φ n ( x ) = x S n ( x ) ( 2 n + 2 ) S n ( x ) .
Then
Φ n ( k ) ( x ) = x S n ( k + 1 ) ( x ) ( 2 n + 2 k ) S n ( k ) ( x )
for k N . Further making use of the equalities in (22), we have
( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 2 ) ( x ) = ( 1 ) n + 1 x S n ( 2 n 1 ) ( x ) 4 S n ( 2 n 2 ) ( x ) = x ( x cos x + 2 x 3 sin x ) 4 ( x cos x + 2 x 3 sin x ) = 12 sin x x 2 sin x 6 x 6 x cos x .
A direct computation yields
( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 2 ) ( x ) sin x = 12 x 2 6 x 1 + cos x sin x
and
( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 2 ) ( x ) sin x = 6 x ( cos x + 1 ) sin 2 x 2 + cos x 3 sin x x > 0
for x > 0 . Accordingly, we obtain
( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 2 ) ( x ) sin x > lim x 0 12 x 2 6 x 1 + cos x sin x = 0 ,
which implies that
( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 2 ) ( x ) > 0 , x ( 0 , π )
and
( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 2 ) ( x ) < 0 , x ( π , 2 π ) .
Since Φ n ( k ) ( 0 ) = 0 for 0 k 2 n 2 , it follows that ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( k ) ( x ) > 0 for x ( 0 , π ) for 0 k 2 n 2 . This implies that SinR n ( x ) < 0 for x ( 0 , π ) and n 1 . The first proof of Theorem 1 is thus complete. □
Second proof of concavity in Theorem 1. 
Using the second integral representation in (20) and differentiating twice yield
SinR n ( x ) = ( 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 u 2 ( 1 u ) 2 n cos ( u x ) d u .
Differentiation again gives
SinR n ( x ) = ( 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 u 3 ( 1 u ) 2 n sin ( u x ) d u > 0
for x ( 0 , π ) . Then
SinR n ( x ) < SinR n ( π ) = ( 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 u 2 ( 1 u ) 2 n cos ( π u ) d u , x ( 0 , π ) .
Let
P 1 ( n ) = 0 1 / 2 u 2 ( 1 u ) 2 n cos ( π u ) d u
and
P 2 ( n ) = 1 / 2 1 u 2 ( 1 u ) 2 n cos ( π u ) d u .
Making a change of variables u = 1 v gives
P 2 ( n ) = 0 1 / 2 ( 1 v ) 2 v 2 n cos ( π v ) d v .
Accordingly, since
( 1 t ) α t α { = 0 , α = 0 > 0 , α > 0
for t 0 , 1 2 , we derive
P 1 ( n ) + P 2 ( n ) = 0 1 / 2 t 2 ( 1 t ) 2 n ( 1 t ) 2 t 2 n cos ( π t ) d t = 0 1 / 2 ( 1 t ) 2 n 2 t 2 n 2 t 2 ( 1 t ) 2 cos ( π t ) d t { = 0 , n = 1 ; > 0 , n 2 .
This implies that SinR n ( x ) < 0 for x ( 0 , π ) and n N . The normalized remainder SinR n ( x ) for n N is thus concave on ( 0 , π ) . □
Remark 1.
From the decreasing property in Theorem 1, the limit (24), and the definition (16) of the function SinR n ( x ) for n 1 , we immediately deduce the inequality
0 < ( 1 ) n ( 2 n + 1 ) ! x 2 n sin x x k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) ! x 2 k < 1
for n 1 and x ( 0 , ) . Consequently, the first inequalities in (10) and (11) are recovered and the double inequality
0 < ( 1 ) n sin x x k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) ! x 2 k < x 2 n ( 2 n + 1 ) !
for n 1 and x R { 0 } of the sinc function sin x x is deduced. For more information on the sinc function, please refer to closely related texts and references in the paper [13].
Remark 2.
The integral representation (5) can be reformulated as
SR n ( x ) = ( 1 ) n x 2 n ( 2 n 1 ) ! 0 1 ( 1 t ) 2 n 1 sin ( x t ) d t
for n 1 and x R . Accordingly, substituting (27) into the first equality (18) leads to
SinR n ( x ) = { ( 2 n + 1 ) ! ( 2 n 1 ) ! 0 1 t ( 1 t ) 2 n 1 sin ( x t ) x t d t , x 0 1 , x = 0
and directly differentiating shows
SinR n ( x ) = ( 2 n + 1 ) ! ( 2 n 1 ) ! 0 1 t ( 1 t ) 2 n 1 d 2 d x 2 sin ( x t ) x t d t
for n 1 and x > 0 . Straightforward differentiation and computation give
sin u u = ( u 2 2 ) sin u + 2 u cos u u 3
and
[ ( u 2 2 ) sin u + 2 u cos u ] = u 2 cos u .
The function u 2 cos u is positive on 0 , π 2 and negative on π 2 , π . Since
lim u π / 2 [ ( u 2 2 ) sin u + 2 u cos u ] = π 2 4 2 = 0.467
and
lim u π [ ( u 2 2 ) sin u + 2 u cos u ] = 2 π ,
there exists a unique point u 0 π 2 , π such that
( u 2 2 ) sin u + 2 u cos u > 0 , u ( 0 , u 0 ) .
Hence, the second derivative SinR n ( x ) for n 1 is negative, and then the normalized remainder SinR n ( x ) is concave, on the interval ( 0 , x 0 ) , where
x 0 = inf u 0 t , t ( 0 , 1 ) = u 0 .
Remark 3.
Direct computation gives
( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 3 ) ( x ) = x 2 cos x 20 cos x 8 x sin x 3 x 2 + 20 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 3 ) ( π ) = 4 10 π 2 > 0 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 3 ) ( 2 π ) = 8 π 2 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 4 ) ( x ) = 20 x 30 sin x + x 2 sin x + 10 x cos x x 3 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 4 ) 4 π 3 = 20 π 8 9 3 π 2 64 27 π 3 + 15 3 = 0.121 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 4 ) ( 2 π ) = 4 π 2 π 2 15 < 0 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 5 ) ( x ) = 42 cos x x 2 cos x + 12 x sin x + 10 x 2 1 4 x 4 42 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 5 ) 3 π 2 = 45 2 π 2 18 π 81 64 π 4 42 = 0.234 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 5 ) ( 2 π ) = 4 π 2 π 2 9 < 0 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 6 ) ( x ) = 56 sin x 42 x x 2 sin x 14 x cos x + 10 3 x 3 1 20 x 5 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 6 ) 5 π 3 = 25 18 3 π 2 245 3 π + 1250 81 π 3 625 972 π 5 28 3 = 0.401 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 6 ) ( 2 π ) = 4 π 2 π 2 9 < 0 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 7 ) ( x ) = x 2 cos x 72 cos x 16 x sin x 21 x 2 + 5 6 x 4 1 120 x 6 + 72 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 7 ) 7 π 4 = 14 2 π + 49 32 2 π 2 1029 16 π 2 + 12005 1536 π 4 117649 491520 π 6 36 2 + 72 = 1.132 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 7 ) ( 2 π ) = 40 3 π 4 80 π 2 8 15 π 6 = 3.521 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 8 ) ( x ) = 72 x 90 sin x + x 2 sin x + 18 x cos x 7 x 3 + x 5 6 x 7 840 , ( 1 ) n + 1 Φ n ( 2 n 8 ) ( 2 π ) = 180 π 56 π 3 + 16 3 π 5 16 105 π 7 = 1.005 .
Consequently, we conclude that
1. 
when n 2 , the second derivative SinR n ( x ) is negative on 0 , 4 π 3 ;
2. 
when n 3 , the second derivative SinR n ( x ) is negative on 0 , 3 π 2 ;
3. 
when n 4 , the second derivative SinR n ( x ) is negative on ( 0 , 2 π ) .
In other words,
1. 
when n 2 , the normalized remainder SinR n ( x ) is concave on 0 , 4 π 3 ;
2. 
when n 3 , the normalized remainder SinR n ( x ) is concave on 0 , 3 π 2 ;
3. 
when n 4 , the normalized remainder SinR n ( x ) is concave on ( 0 , 2 π ) .
Remark 4.
Using the second integral representation in (20) and differentiating under integration k 0 times consecutively result in
SinR n ( k ) ( x ) = ( 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 u ) 2 n u k cos x u + k π 2 d u = { ( 1 ) m 1 ( 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 u ) 2 n u 2 m 2 cos ( x u ) d u , k = 2 m 2 ( 1 ) m ( 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 u ) 2 n u 2 m 1 sin ( x u ) d u , k = 2 m 1
for m , n 1 and x R . This means that
( 1 ) m SinR n ( 2 m ) ( x ) = ( 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 u ) 2 n u 2 m cos ( x u ) d u > 0
for m 0 and x 0 , π 2 and that
( 1 ) m + 1 SinR n ( 2 m + 1 ) ( x ) = ( 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 u ) 2 n u 2 m + 1 sin ( x u ) d u > 0
for m 0 and x ( 0 , π ) . These imply that the functions
( 1 ) m SinR n ( 2 m 1 ) ( x ) = ( 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 u ) 2 n u 2 m 1 sin ( x u ) d u
for m , n 1 are increasing in x 0 , π 2 and that the functions
( 1 ) m SinR n ( 2 m ) ( x ) = ( 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 u ) 2 n u 2 m cos ( x u ) d u
for m 0 and n 1 are decreasing in x ( 0 , π ) . Consequently, we obtain
1. 
for m , n 1 and x 0 , π 2
0 < ( 1 ) m SinR n ( 2 m 1 ) ( x ) < ( 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 u ) 2 n u 2 m 1 sin u π 2 d u ;
2. 
for m 0 , n 1 , and x ( 0 , π )
( 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 u ) 2 n u 2 m cos ( u π ) d u < ( 1 ) m SinR n ( 2 m ) ( x )                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             < ( 2 n + 1 ) B ( 2 m + 1 , 2 n + 1 ) ,
where the classical Euler beta function B ( p , q ) can be defined ([14], p. 258) by
B ( p , q ) = 0 1 t p 1 ( 1 t ) q 1 d t = Γ ( p ) Γ ( q ) Γ ( p + q )
for ( p ) , ( q ) > 0 .
Remark 5.
The function F λ ( x ) in (8) can be reformulated as
F λ ( x ) = x λ + 1 0 1 ( 1 u ) λ sin ( x u ) d u .
Hence, we deduce the relation
F λ ( x ) x λ + 1 ( k ) = 0 1 ( 1 u ) λ u k sin x u + k π 2 d u
for λ R and k 0 . This reveals that the function F 2 n ( x ) x 2 n + 1 ( k ) is different from the function
SinR n ( k ) ( x ) 2 n + 1 = 0 1 ( 1 u ) 2 n u k cos x u + k π 2 d u
for k 0 and n 1 , but they are siblings and special cases of the Riemann–Liouville (fractional) integral defined in (7).
Remark 6.
How about the convexity or concavity of the remainder SinR n ( x ) for n 1 on the whole infinite interval ( 0 , ) ?

3. Decreasing Property and Concavity of CosR n ( x )

In this section, we prove the decreasing property and concavity of the even function CosR n ( x ) for n 1 on ( 0 , ) .
Theorem 2.
The normalized remainder CosR 1 ( x ) is nonnegative on ( 0 , ) , is decreasing on [ 0 , 2 π ] , and is concave on ( 0 , x 0 ) , where x 0 π 2 , π is the first positive zero of the equation
x 2 2 sin x + 2 x cos x = 0 .
For n 2 , the normalized remainder CosR n ( x ) is positive and decreasing on ( 0 , ) and is concave on ( 0 , π ) .
Proof. 
It is immediate that the even function
CosR 1 ( x ) = { 2 ( 1 cos x ) x 2 , x 0 1 , x = 0
is positive on the set
k = 0 ( 2 k π , 2 k π + 2 π )
and equals zero at the points 2 k π for k = 1 , 2 , .
Straightforward differetiation gives
x 3 CosR 1 ( x ) = x sin x { < 0 , x ( 0 , π ) ; = 0 , x = 0 , π , 2 π ; > 0 , x ( π , 2 π ) .
Hence, the function
x 3 CosR 1 ( x ) = x cos x sin x
has a unique minimum π at x = π on [ 0 , 2 π ] , is equal to 0 at x = 0 , and is equal to 2 π at x = 2 π . Accordingly, the function
x 3 CosR 1 ( x ) = x sin x + 2 cos x 2
has a unique minimum at some point x 0 ( π , 2 π ) on [ 0 , 2 π ] and is apparently equal to 0 at the points x = 0 , 2 π . Thus, the first derivative
CosR 1 ( x ) = x sin x + 2 cos x 2 x 3
is negative on ( 0 , 2 π ) . As a result, the normalized remainder CosR 1 ( x ) is decreasing on [ 0 , 2 π ] .
Utilizing the expression (19) and straightforwardly differentiating give
CosR n ( x ) = ( 1 ) n x CR n ( x ) 2 n CR n ( x ) x 2 n + 1 = ( 1 ) n ( 2 n ) ! x 2 n + 1 T n ( x )
for n 2 , where
T n ( x ) = x sin x + 2 n ( 1 cos x ) + k = 1 n 1 ( 1 ) k 2 n 2 k ( 2 k ) ! x 2 k
and
T n ( j ) ( x ) = ( j 2 n ) cos x + j π 2 x sin x + j π 2 + k = 1 n 1 ( 1 ) k 2 n 2 k ( 2 k ) ! 2 k j x 2 k j
for j 0 and n 2 . In particular,
T n ( 2 n 3 ) ( x ) = ( 1 ) n 3 x sin x x 2 + cos x 3 < 0
for n 2 on ( 0 , ) , where we used the inequality (23) for x > 0 . This means the negativity ( 1 ) n T n ( 2 n 3 ) ( x ) < 0 for n 2 on ( 0 , ) . It is not difficult to verify that ( 1 ) n T n ( j ) ( 0 ) = 0 for 0 j 2 n 3 and n 2 . Accordingly, the functions ( 1 ) n T n ( j ) ( x ) for 0 j 2 n 3 and n 2 are negative on ( 0 , ) . This leads to that the derivative CosR n ( x ) for n 2 is negative on ( 0 , ) , and then the function CosR n ( x ) for n 2 is decreasing on ( 0 , ) .
Taking x on both sides of the first equality in (21) results in the limit
lim x CosR n ( x ) = 0 , n 1 .
Consequently, the function CosR n ( x ) for n 2 is positive on ( 0 , ) .
The integral representation (6) can be rearranged as
CR n ( x ) = ( 1 ) n x 2 n 1 ( 2 n 2 ) ! 0 1 ( 1 t ) 2 n 2 sin ( x t ) d t
for n 1 and x R . Thus, substituting (32) into the left equality in (19) gives
CosR n ( x ) = ( 2 n ) ! ( 2 n 2 ) ! 0 1 t ( 1 t ) 2 n 2 sin ( x t ) x t d t
and straightforwardly differentiating shows
CosR n ( x ) = ( 2 n ) ! ( 2 n 2 ) ! 0 1 t ( 1 t ) 2 n 2 d 2 d x 2 sin ( x t ) x t d t
for n 1 and x > 0 . Making use of the negativity of the second derivative in (28), we find that the second derivative CosR n ( x ) for n 1 is negative, and then the normalized remainder CosR n ( x ) is concave, on the interval ( 0 , x 0 ) , where x 0 π 2 , π .
Differentiation gives
CosR n ( x ) = ( 1 ) n ( 2 n ) ! Ψ n ( x ) x 2 n + 2 ,
where
Ψ n ( x ) = x T n ( x ) ( 2 n + 1 ) T n ( x )
and
Ψ n ( k ) ( x ) = x Ψ n ( k + 1 ) ( x ) ( 2 n + 1 k ) Ψ n ( k ) ( x )
for k N . The Equations (22) and (30) means
T n ( 2 n 3 ) ( x ) = S n ( 2 n 2 ) ( x ) = ( 1 ) n + 1 ( x cos x + 2 x 3 sin x ) ,
so we have
Ψ n ( 2 n 3 ) ( x ) = x T n ( 2 n 2 ) ( x ) 4 T n ( 2 n 3 ) ( x ) = Φ n ( 2 n 2 ) ( x ) ,
where Φ n ( x ) is given by (25). Using the same techniques as used in the proof of Theorem 1, we acquire
( 1 ) n + 1 Ψ n ( 2 n 3 ) ( x ) > 0 , x ( 0 , π )
and
( 1 ) n + 1 Ψ n ( 2 n 3 ) ( x ) < 0 , x ( π , 2 π ) .
It then follows that CosR n ( x ) < 0 for x ( 0 , π ) and n 2 . The proof of Theorem 2 is complete. □
Remark 7.
From the decreasing property of CosR n ( x ) for n 2 in Theorem 2, the limit (31), and the definition (17) of the function CosR n ( x ) for n 1 , we derive the inequality
0 < ( 1 ) n ( 2 n ) ! x 2 n cos x k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! < 1
for n 2 and x ( 0 , ) . Consequently, the second inequalities for n 2 in (10) and (11) are recovered and the double inequality
0 < ( 1 ) n cos x k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! < x 2 n ( 2 n ) !
for n 2 and x R { 0 } is obtained.
In light of the nonnegativity of CosR 1 ( x ) in Theorem 2, as long as replacing the left strict inequalities 0 < by non-strict inequalities 0 , both of the inequalities (34) and (35) are also valid for n = 1 in x ( 0 , ) .
Remark 8.
Combining the limits in (24) and (31) with the second integral representations in (20) and (21) leads to the limit
lim x 0 1 ( 1 u ) k cos ( x u ) d u = 0 , k N .
Remark 9.
The inequalities in (10), (11), (26) and (35) imply that the sine and cosine functions are enveloped by their Maclaurin series expansions. Various related results on enveloping series were given in [15,16].
Remark 10.
Combining Remark 3 with the relation (33), we find that,
1. 
when n 3 , the normalized remainder CosR n ( x ) is concave on 0 , 3 π 2 ;
2. 
when n 4 , the normalized remainder CosR n ( x ) is concave on 0 , 7 π 4 ;
3. 
when n 5 , the normalized remainder CosR n ( x ) is concave on ( 0 , 2 π ) .
Remark 11.
For n 1 , how about the convexity or concavity of the normalized remainder CosR n ( x ) on the whole infinite interval ( 0 , ) ?

4. An Open Problem and Several Special Values

Stimulated by integral representations in (20) and (21), we now consider the function I ( x , y ) defined by
I ( x , y ) = { 0 1 ( 1 u ) y sin ( x u ) x d u , x 0 1 ( y + 1 ) ( y + 2 ) , x = 0 = { 1 y + 1 0 1 ( 1 u ) y + 1 cos ( x u ) d u , x 0 1 ( y + 1 ) ( y + 2 ) , x = 0
for x R and y > 1 . It is clear that
lim y I ( x , y ) = 0 , x ( 0 , )
and
lim x 0 1 ( 1 u ) y + 1 cos ( x u ) d u = 0 , y > 1 .
The limit (38) is a generalization of the limit (36).
It is easy to see that, for n 1 and x R ,
I ( x , 2 n 1 ) = SinR n ( x ) 2 n ( 2 n + 1 ) and I ( x , 2 n 2 ) = CosR n ( x ) 2 n ( 2 n 1 ) .
By virtue of two relations in (39), in view of Theorems 1 and 2, we can derive the following corollary immediately.
Corollary 1.
The function I ( x , 0 ) is nonnegative on ( 0 , ) , is decreasing on [ 0 , 2 π ] , and is concave on ( 0 , x 0 ) , where x 0 π 2 , π is the first positive zero of Equation (29).
For n 1 , the function I ( x , n ) is decreasing and positive on ( 0 , ) .
For n 1 , the function I ( x , n ) is concave in x ( 0 , π ) .
How about the nonnegativity, monotonicity, and concavity of the function I ( x , y ) defined by (37) in the real variables x ( 0 , ) and y > 1 ? By instinct and intuition, we list the following four problems.
Open Problem 1.
For y > 1 , the function I ( x , y ) has the following properties.
1. 
For fixed y 1 , the function I ( x , y ) is decreasing and positive in x ( 0 , ) .
2. 
For fixed y ( 0 , 1 ) , the function I ( x , y ) is positive but not monotonic in x ( 0 , ) .
3. 
For fixed y ( 1 , 0 ) , the function I ( x , y ) oscillates in x ( 0 , ) .
4. 
For fixed y > 1 , the function I ( x , y ) is concave if and only if x ( 0 , x 0 ) , where x 0 π 2 , π is the first positive zero of Equation (29).
Remark 12.
For α i C , β i C { 0 , 1 , 2 , } , p , q N = { 1 , 2 , } , and z C , in terms of the rising factorial, or say, the Pochhammer symbol,
( z ) n = Γ ( z + n ) Γ ( z ) = = 0 n 1 ( z + ) = z ( z + 1 ) ( z + n 1 ) , n N ; 1 , n = 0 ,
the generalized hypergeometric series is defined ([17], p. 1020) by
  p F q ( α 1 , α 2 , , α p ; β 1 , β 2 , β q ; z ) = n = 0 k = 1 p ( α k ) n k = 1 q ( β k ) n z n n ! .
In particular, the function   2 F 1 ( α 1 , α 2 ; β 1 ; z ) is called the Gauss hypergeometric function, the function   1 F 1 ( α , β ; z ) is called the confluent hypergeometric function of the first kind, the function   0 F 1 ( ; β ; z ) is called the confluent hypergeometric limit function, and the like.
In ([17], pp. 443–444), there are the following three integral formulas.
1. 
For a > 0 and ( ν ) > 1 ,
0 1 ( 1 x ) ν sin ( a x ) d x = 1 a Γ ( ν + 1 ) a ν + 1 C ν ( a ) = s ν + 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 ( a ) a ν + 1 / 2 ,
where C ν ( a ) is the Young function given in ([17], p. 443) by
C ν ( a ) = a ν 2 Γ ( ν + 1 ) [   1 F 1 ( 1 ; ν + 1 ; a i ) +   1 F 1 ( 1 ; ν + 1 ; a i ) ] = n = 0 ( 1 ) n a ν + 2 n Γ ( ν + 2 n + 1 ) ,
the notation i = 1 is the imaginary unit, and s μ , ν ( z ) is the Lommel function defined in ([17], p. 954) and (Chapter 11 of [18]) by
s μ , ν ( z ) = m = 0 ( 1 ) m z μ + 1 + 2 m = 0 m [ ( μ + 2 + 1 ) 2 ν 2 ] = z μ 1 m = 0 ( 1 ) m Γ 1 2 μ 1 2 ν + 1 2 Γ 1 2 μ + 1 2 ν + 1 2 Γ 1 2 μ 1 2 ν + m + 3 2 1 2 μ + 1 2 ν + m + 3 2 z 2 2 m + 2
for μ ± ν being not a negative odd integer. In [19], Koumandos investigated the Lommel functions.
2. 
For a > 0 , ( μ ) > 0 , ( ν ) > 1 , and ν 0 ,
0 u x ν 1 ( u x ) μ 1 sin ( a x ) d x                                                       = u μ + ν 1 2 i B ( μ , ν ) [   1 F 1 ( ν ; μ + ν ; a u i )   1 F 1 ( ν ; μ + ν ; a u i ) ] .
3. 
For a > 0 , ( μ ) > 0 , ( ν ) > 1 , and ν 0 ,
0 1 x ν 1 ( 1 x ) μ 1 sin ( a x ) d x                                                                             = i 2 B ( μ , ν ) [   1 F 1 ( ν ; ν + μ ; a i )   1 F 1 ( ν ; ν + μ ; a i ) ] .
Combining the first integral representation in (37) with the Formula (40) results in that
I ( x , y ) = 1 x 2 1 Γ ( y + 1 ) C y ( x ) x y = s y + 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 ( x ) x y + 3 / 2
for x > 0 and y > 1 . Combining this with Corollary 1, we can derive some monotonicity results of the Young and Lommel functions C n ( x ) and s n + 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 ( x ) for n 0 in x ( 0 , ) .
Taking ν = 1 and replacing μ by y + 1 in (42) leads to
I ( x , y ) = i 2 ( y + 1 )   1 F 1 ( 1 ; y + 2 ; x i )   1 F 1 ( 1 ; y + 2 ; x i ) x
for x > 0 and y > 1 . Letting ν = 1 and μ = y + 1 in (41), changing the variable of integration in (41), and simplifying arrive at the Formula (44) once again. The Formula (44) can be reformulated as
I ( x , y ) = 1 2 ( y + 1 ) 1 x i x i x i [   1 F 1 ( 1 ; y + 2 ; u ) ] u d u = 1 2 ( y + 1 ) ( y + 2 ) 1 x i x i x i   1 F 1 ( 2 ; y + 3 ; u ) d u = 1 2 ( y + 1 ) ( y + 2 ) 1 1   1 F 1 ( 2 ; y + 3 ; x u i ) d u
for x > 0 and y > 1 , where we used the relation
[   1 F 1 ( a ; b ; u ) ] u = a b   1 F 1 ( a + 1 ; b + 1 ; u )
in ([14], p. 507, Entry 13.4.8).
Remark 13.
In (Theorem 1.2 of [6]), Koumandos proved that the inequality
[ s a , 1 / 2 ( x ) ] 2 s a 1 , 1 / 2 ( x ) s a + 1 , 1 / 2 ( x ) 1 1 2 a [ s a , 1 / 2 ( x ) ] 2
holds true for all x > 0 when a 3 2 and that the inequality (45) fails to hold for appropriate x > 0 when 1 2 < a < 3 2 and a 1 2 .
Remark 14.
Setting y = 2 n 1 and y = 2 n 2 in (43) and considering the relations in (39), we derive
SinR n ( x ) 2 n ( 2 n + 1 ) = 1 x 2 1 Γ ( 2 n ) C 2 n 1 ( x ) x 2 n 1 = s 2 n 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 ( x ) x 2 n + 1 / 2
and
CosR n ( x ) 2 n ( 2 n 1 ) = 1 x 2 1 Γ ( 2 n 1 ) C 2 n 2 ( x ) x 2 n 2 = s 2 n 3 / 2 , 1 / 2 ( x ) x 2 n 1 / 2
for n 1 and x > 0 . From the Equations (46) and (47), we conclude the closed-form expressions
C 2 n 1 ( x ) = ( 1 ) n + 1 sin x k = 0 n 2 ( 1 ) k x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! ,
C 2 n 2 ( x ) = ( 1 ) n + 1 cos x k = 0 n 2 ( 1 ) k x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! ,
s 2 n 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 ( x ) = ( 1 ) n ( 2 n 1 ) ! x 1 / 2 sin x k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! ,
s 2 n 3 / 2 , 1 / 2 ( x ) = ( 1 ) n ( 2 n 2 ) ! x 1 / 2 cos x k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k x 2 k ( 2 k ) !
for n 1 and x > 0 of the Young function C ν ( x ) and the Lommel function s μ , ν ( z ) .
In ([17], p. 995), the connection
s μ , ν = z μ + 1 ( μ ν + 1 ) ( μ + ν + 1 )   1 F 2 1 ; μ ν + 3 2 , μ + ν + 3 2 ; z 2 4
is given. Combining this with the closed-form expressions (50) and (51) yields
  1 F 2 1 ; n + 1 , n + 3 2 ; x 2 4 = ( 1 ) n ( 2 n + 1 ) ! x 2 n + 1 sin x k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! = SinR n ( x )
and
  1 F 2 1 ; n + 1 2 , n + 1 ; x 2 4 = ( 1 ) n ( 2 n ) ! x 2 n cos x k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! = CosR n ( x )
for n 1 and x > 0 .
The Equations (52) and (53) imply the significance of the new notions of normalized tails of the Maclaurin series expansions of the sine and cosine functions.
Combining the relations (52) and (53) with two relations in (39), we reveal that Open Problem 1 is essentially equivalent to the positivity, monotonicity, and concavity of the generalized hypergeometric function   1 F 2 1 ; y , y + 1 2 ; x 2 4 in x > 0 for y 1 . See the questions at https://mathoverflow.net/q/448555 (accessed on 8 March 2024) and their answers.
Remark 15.
In the paper [20], several interesting properties for the normalized tails of the Maclaurin power series expansion of the generating function z e z 1 of the classical Bernoulli numbers B 2 n for n N were discovered.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we presented the following main results.
  • Introduced two notions, the normalized tails SinR n ( x ) and CosR n ( x ) in (16) and (17) of the Maclaurin power series expansions (1) and (2), derived four integral representations in (20) and (21) of the normalized tails SinR n ( x ) and CosR n ( x ) .
  • Acquired the positivity, decreasing property, and concavity of the normalized remainder SinR n ( x ) . See Theorem 1.
  • Discovered the nonnegativity, positivity, decreasing property, and concavity of the normalized remainder CosR n ( x ) . See Theorem 2.
  • Computed several special values of the Young function C ν ( x ) , see (48) and (49), of the Lommel function s μ , ν ( z ) , see (50) and (51), and of the hypergeometric function   1 F 2 ( α ; β , γ ; z ) , see (52) and (53).
  • Recovered the inequalities in (10) and (11). See the inequalities (26) and (35).
  • Proposed three open problems about the positivity, nonnegativity, decreasing property, and concavity of the newly introduced function I ( x , y ) which is a generalization of the normalized tails SinR n ( x ) and CosR n ( x ) . See Remarks 6 and 11 and Open Problem 1.

Author Contributions

Writing original draft, T.Z., Z.-H.Y., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; writing—review and editing, T.Z., Z.-H.Y., F.Q. and W.-S.D. All authors contributed equally to the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Tao Zhang was partially supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12001472). Wei-Shih Du was partially supported by Grant No. NSTC 112-2115-M-017-002 of the National Science and Technology Council of the Republic of China.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions and valuable comments on the original version of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zorich, V.A. Mathematical Analysis II, 2nd ed.; Cooke, R.; Octavio Paniagua, T., Translators; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Apostol, T.M. Calculus, 2nd ed.; Blaisdell Publishing Co. [Ginn and Co.]: Waltham, MA, USA; Toronto, ON, Canada; London, UK, 1967; Volume I. [Google Scholar]
  3. Erdélyi, A.; Magnus, W.; Oberhettinger, F.; Tricomi, F.G. Tables of Integral Transforms; Based, in part, on notes left by Harry Bateman; McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.: New York, NY, USA; Toronto, ON, Canada; London, UK, 1954; Volume II. [Google Scholar]
  4. Temme, N.M. Special Functions: An Introduction to Classical Functions of Mathematical Physics; A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wei, C.-F. Integral representations and inequalities of extended central binomial coefficients. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2022, 45, 5412–5422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Koumandos, S. On the log-concavity of the fractional integral of the sine function. J. Approx. Theory 2016, 210, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kuang, J.-C. Chángyòng Bùděngshì (Applied Inequalities), 4th ed.; Shandong Science and Technology Press: Jinan, China, 2010. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, Y.-F.; Qi, F. A series expansion of a logarithmic expression and a decreasing property of the ratio of two logarithmic expressions containing cosine. Open Math. 2023, 11, 3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, X.-L.; Long, H.-X.; Qi, F. A series expansion of a logarithmic expression and a decreasing property of the ratio of two logarithmic expressions containing sine. Mathematics 2023, 11, 3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wan, A.; Qi, F. Power series expansion, decreasing property, and concavity related to logarithm of normalized tail of power series expansion of cosine. Electron. Res. Arch. 2024, 32, 3130–3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Comtet, L. Advanced Combinatorics: The Art of Finite and Infinite Expansions; Revised and Enlarged Edition; D. Reidel Publishing Co.: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, Z.-H. Three families of two-parameter means constructed by trigonometric functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 2013, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, W.-H.; Shen, Q.-X.; Guo, B.-N. Several double inequalities for integer powers of the sinc and sinhc functions with applications to the Neuman–Sándor mean and the first Seiffert mean. Axioms 2022, 11, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A. (Eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables; National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series 55; Reprint of the 1972 edition; Dover Publications, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pólya, G.; Szegö, G. Problems and Theorems in Analysis: Series, Integral Calculus, Theory of Functions; Aeppli, S., Translator; Reprint of the 1978 English translation; Classics in Mathematics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1998; Volume I. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ross, D.K.; Mahajan, A. On enveloping series for some of the special functions, and on integral inequalities involving them. In General Inequalities 2: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on General Inequalities, Oberwolfach, Germany, 30 July–5 August 1978; Birkhäuser Verlag: Basel, Switzerland; Boston, MA, USA, 1980; pp. 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 8th ed.; Zwillinger, D.; Moll, V., Translators; Elsevier/Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Olver, F.W.J.; Lozier, D.W.; Boisvert, R.F.; Clark, C.W. (Eds.) NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010. Available online: http://dlmf.nist.gov (accessed on 9 March 2024).
  19. Koumandos, S. Positive trigonometric integrals associated with some Lommel functions of the first kind. Mediterr. J. Math. 2017, 14, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, G.-Z.; Yang, Z.-H.; Qi, F. On normalized tails of series expansion of generating function of Bernoulli numbers. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, T.; Yang, Z.-H.; Qi, F.; Du, W.-S. Some Properties of Normalized Tails of Maclaurin Power Series Expansions of Sine and Cosine. Fractal Fract. 2024, 8, 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8050257

AMA Style

Zhang T, Yang Z-H, Qi F, Du W-S. Some Properties of Normalized Tails of Maclaurin Power Series Expansions of Sine and Cosine. Fractal and Fractional. 2024; 8(5):257. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8050257

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Tao, Zhen-Hang Yang, Feng Qi, and Wei-Shih Du. 2024. "Some Properties of Normalized Tails of Maclaurin Power Series Expansions of Sine and Cosine" Fractal and Fractional 8, no. 5: 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8050257

APA Style

Zhang, T., Yang, Z. -H., Qi, F., & Du, W. -S. (2024). Some Properties of Normalized Tails of Maclaurin Power Series Expansions of Sine and Cosine. Fractal and Fractional, 8(5), 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8050257

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop