Abstract
This paper establishes a unique approach known as the multi-generalized Laplace transform decomposition method (MGLTDM) to solve linear and nonlinear dispersive KdV-type equations. This method combines the multi-generalized Laplace transform (MGLT) with the decomposition method (DM), and offers a strong procedure for handling complicated equations. To verify the applicability and validity of this method, some ideal problems of dispersive KDV-type equations are discussed and the outcoming approximate solutions are stated in sequential form. The results show that the MGLTDM is a dependable and powerful technique to deal with physical problems in diverse implementations.
Keywords:
one-dimensional fractional dispersive KDV equation; fractional third-order dispersive partial differential equations; generalized Laplace transform; Adomian Decomposition method; multi-generalized Laplace transform decomposition; double- and triple-generalized Laplace transform decomposition MSC:
35A44; 65M44; 35A22
1. Intordection
Fractional partial differential equations (FPDEs) are utilized to model various physical phenomena in several regions of sciences and engineering, for instance, fluid mechanics, mathematical chemistry, quantum mechanics, kinetics, and linear optics. In 1895, Korteweg and de Vries acquired a non-dimensionalized equation, which is called the KdV equation. This model is employed to examine the dispersive wave phenomena in many fluids of science and technology. The e Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) equation was first introduced in [1,2] to evolving small amplitude, long surface gravity waves propagating in a shallow channel of water. This equation has arisen in several other physical contexts including collision-free hydromagnetic waves, stratified interior waves, ion-acoustic waves, plasma physics, lattice dynamics, etc. The fractional forced Korteweg–de Vries (FF-KdV) equation was studied by exploiting the fractional natural decomposition method (FNDM) in [3]. The (1 + 1) and (2 + 1) dimensional KdV equations are solved by using two methods called the variational homotopy perturbation method and a classical finite-difference method [4]. The researchers in [5] implemented the Shehu transformation and the iterative transformation technique under the Atangana–Baleanu fractional derivative to find an analytical solution to fractional fuzzy third-order dispersive KdV problems. A time-fractional third-order dispersive partial differential equation has a significant consequence in the area of mathematical sciences. The Laplace domain decomposition method has been proposed in [6] for solving four different types of KdV equations. Numerous outcomes of the dispersive KdV equations of the third and fifth orders were examined in [7,8]. The numerical approximation solution of the nonlinear KDV equation is obtained by using the ADM in [9]. The authors in [10] have successfully applied the ADM to find the solution of a coupled modified KdV equation. The authors in [11] applied the fractional differential transform method (FDTM) and the modified fractional differential transform method (MFDTM) to solve fractional third-order dispersive partial differential equations in one- and higher-dimensional spaces, The researchers in [12] developed a three-level implicit method to solve linear and non-linear third-order dispersive partial differential equations, a new numerical method which is a combination of Sumudu transforms and the Homotopy analysis method is used to discuss time fractional third-order dispersive-type PDEs [13]. The authors in [14] studied the non-integer Burger’s equation, the non-integer Schrodinger equation, and the non-integer coupled Burger’s equation by using Laplace-type integral transform combined with Adomian’s method. Generalized Laplace transform was utilized to solve partial differential equations (PDEs) in [15]. The authors in [16] checked the applicable range of
-transform to obtain solutions of ordinary differential equations with variable coefficients. The solution of Abel’s integral equation has been investigated by applying
-transform in [17]. The authors in [18] examined the solution of third-order dispersive partial differential equations by applying Sumudu-Generalized Laplace transform decomposition.
The fundamental goal of this work is to establish a novel definition for generalized multi-variable Laplace transform. Additionally, we then display how this technique alters fractional partial derivatives, ultimately profiting from the multi-generalized Laplace transform decomposition method solving one and two-dimensional fractional dispersive Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) equations. This procedure provided more versatile means to gain the solution of difficult fractional differential equations and illuminates possible applications in several scientific and engineering domains.
2. Definitions and Ideas
Here, we offer some basic important definitions and terminologies associated wth fractional calculus and generalized multi-Laplace transform decomposition, which are helpful in this study. Generalized Laplace transform (GLT) of the function
is denoted by
in the subsequent definition.
Definition 1.
If
is an integrable function determined for all
, its (GLT)
is the integral defined by
, and is defined by
; hence
where,
and
; for more details, see [19].
Definition 2.
The fractional derivative of
in the Caputo sense is denoted by
For more details, see [20,21,22,23].
In this work, the following notations are used:
In the following definitions, we determine the double-G Laplace transform (DGLT) and triple-G Laplace transform (TGLT) as:
Definition 3
([24]). The (DGLT) of the function
is identified as
where
,
and the symbol
indicates the transform of
and t, respectively, and the function
is denoted as the (DGLT) of the
The notable advantage of the double-G Laplace transform is that it is more general than the other transforms because we can generate the following transformations:
- If we put , and , we obtain double Laplace transform
- If we put and replace s with , we obtain Laplace–Yang Transform
- At and replacing by v, respectively, we obtain double Sumudu Transform
Definition 4
([24]). The inverse double-G Laplace transform (IDGLT) is given by
where
indicates (IDGLT).
Definition 5
([25]). The (TGLT) of the function
is defined as
where
indicates (TGLT) and the symbols
and s denote transforms of the variable
and t, respectively.
Definition 6
([25]). The inverse triple-G Laplace transform (ITGLT)
where
indicates (IGTLT).
The multi-G Laplace transform (MGLT) of the function
is offered by
where
so, the (MGLTs) of
are provided by
in particular at
the (DGLT) and (TGLT) of functions
and
are provided by
where the symbols
and
indicate DGLT and TGLT, respectively. The following example is helpful for this study.
Example 1.
The double- and triple-G Laplace transforms of the function
and
are given by
where
indicate double-G Laplace transform with respect to x and y, and consequently,
and the triple-G Laplace transform of
is given by
where
indicates the triple-G Laplace transform with respect to
and z, and consequently,
and
3. n + 1-Dimensional Fractional Dispersive KDV Equation and MGLTDM
In this article unit, we explain four problems of linear and nonlinear fractional dispersive PDEs of order three employing the generalized Laplace transform decomposition method.
The first problem:
Let us consider the following linear
-dimensional Kdv equation with the initial condition of
and
where
are field variables,
are space coordinates in the propagation direction of the field and t is a time. To study the solution of Equation (6) using the MGLTDM, the following steps are discussed:
Step 1: With the assistance of MGLT, Equation (6) becomes
Step 2: Employing Equation (3), we get
where
and
are the (MGLT) for
and
, respectively.
Step 3: Multiplying Equation (9) by
, we get
Step 4: Operating inverse multi-G Laplace transform for Equation (10),
Step 5: Using the ADM procedure for Equation (11), we get
where
and the remaining contents are denoted by
The series solution of Equation (6) is given by
The second problem:
Let us consider the following linear one-dimensional Kdv equation with the initial condition of
and
where
is a field variable,
is a space coordinate in the propagation direction of the field and t is a time. In order to solve Equation (15) by utilizing the double-generalized Laplace transform decomposition method (DGLTDM), the next steps are needed:
Step 1: With the help of DGLT, Equation (15) becomes
Step 2: Utilizing Equation (4), we will get
where
and
are the (GLT) and (DGLT) for
and
, respectively.
Step 3: Multiplying Equation (18) by
, we can get
Step 4: Operating the IDGLT for Equation (19),
Step 5: Employing the ADM procedure for Equation (11), we obtain
here,
where
the remainder of the components are given by
The series solution of Equation (15) is given by
In the following example, we apply the DGLTDM to get the solution of the fractional dispersive KdV equation:
Example 2
([6]). The fractional dispersive KdV equation subject to the initial condition is considered as follows:
and
Solution 1.
By utilizing the DGLT of Equation (24) and using Equation (19), we get
applying the
and
series in the Equation (26), we have
by employing an 0IDGLT for the Equation (28) and using the ADM proceeding it, we get
and
where
the following first two terms are denoted by
thus,
hence,
at
we have
We examine, the approximate solution of Equation (24) as the following:
Thus, the precise solution at
is described by
By simplifying,
Figure 1a introduces a comparison between the exact solution and the obtained numerical solution of Equation (24). At t = 1 and
the exact solution is gained. By taking diverse values of
, such as (,
), we get the approximate solutions. Figure 1b shows the plot of function
in two dimensions.
Figure 1.
(a): Comparison between exact and numerical solutions. (b): The surface of the function
.
Table 1 shows the numerical solution for different values of β for the function
.
Table 1.
Compression between exact and approximation solutions.
Table 1.
Compression between exact and approximation solutions.
| Exact | The Method | Error | The Method | Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β = 1 | β = 0.95 | β = 0.99 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.1412 | 0.1363 | 0.0049 | 0.1396 | 0.0016 |
| 0.2686 | 0.2592 | 0.0094 | 0.2655 | 0.0031 |
| 0.3697 | 0.3568 | 0.0129 | 0.3654 | 0.0043 |
| 0.4346 | 0.4194 | 0.0152 | 0.4296 | 0.0050 |
| 0.4570 | 0.4410 | 0.0159 | 0.4517 | 0.0053 |
| 0.4346 | 0.4194 | 0.0152 | 0.4296 | 0.0050 |
| 0.3697 | 0.3568 | 0.0129 | 0.3654 | 0.0043 |
| 0.2686 | 0.2592 | 0.0094 | 0.2655 | 0.0031 |
| 0.1412 | 0.1363 | 0.0049 | 0.1396 | 0.0016 |
| 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
In the following, we plan some significant evidence about the triple-G Laplace transform decomposition method (TGLTDM) to solve the linear fractional dispersive PDE of order three.
The third problem:
Consider the following linear two-dimensional Kdv equation with the initial condition of
and
where a and b are constant. To gain the solution of Equation (30), the triple-generalized Laplace transform decomposition method (TGLTDM) and the next steps are suggested:
Step 1: Upon utilizing TGLT for Equation (30) and DGLT for Equation (31), we get
where the symbols
denote TGLT.
Step 2: Implementing Equation (4), we obtain
where
and
are the DGLT and TGLT for
and
, respectively.
Step 3: By multiplying Equation (33) by
, we have
Step 4: Applying ITGLT for Equation (34), we obtain
where the symbol
indicates ITGLT.
Step 5: By employing the ADM for Equation (35),
Then, we determine the recurrence connections as
and
and the series solution is given by
Example 3.
The time-fractional dispersive KdV equation is two dimensional with the initial condition accorded by
and
Table 2 shows the numerical solution for different values of β for the function
Table 2.
Compression between exact and approximation solutions.
Table 2.
Compression between exact and approximation solutions.
| Exact | The Method | Error | The Method | Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β = 1 | β = 0.95 | β = 0.99 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.1672 | 0.1693 | 0.0021 | 0.1676 | 0.0004 |
| 0.3277 | 0.3318 | 0.0041 | 0.3286 | 0.0009 |
| 0.4751 | 0.4811 | 0.0059 | 0.4764 | 0.0013 |
| 0.6036 | 0.6112 | 0.0075 | 0.6052 | 0.0016 |
| 0.7081 | 0.7169 | 0.0088 | 0.7100 | 0.0019 |
| 0.7843 | 0.7941 | 0.0098 | 0.7864 | 0.0021 |
| 0.8292 | 0.8396 | 0.0104 | 0.8314 | 0.0022 |
| 0.8411 | 0.8516 | 0.0105 | 0.8433 | 0.0022 |
| 0.8195 | 0.8297 | 0.0102 | 0.8216 | 0.0022 |
| 0.7651 | 0.7747 | 0.0096 | 0.7672 | 0.0020 |
Figure 2a presents a comparison between the exact solution and the gained numerical solution of Equation (39); at t = 1 and
, the exact solution is obtained; by taking various values of
, such as (,
), the approximate solution is acquired. Figure 2b shows the plot of function
with
in three-dimensions.
Figure 2.
(a): A comparison between exact and numerical solutions. (b): The surface of the function
.
The fourth problem:
In this part, we offered the DGLTDM to solve the nonlinear one-dimensional fractional KDV equation.
Now, let us consider the nonlinear (1 + 1) dimensional fractional dispersive KDV equation having the initial condition determined by
and
where
and
are defined, a and b are constants. To get the solution of Equation (43) the past examination method is suggested as follows:
thus,
where
The other elements are accorded by
The Adomian polynomials
for the nonlinear term
can be evaluated by using the following expression:
For more details, see [10], where
is confirmed by
hence, the approximate solution of Equation (43) is given by
We suppose
and
In Equation (43), we obtain the next example:
Example 4.
Let the following non-linear one-dimensional fractional KDV equation have an initial condition defined by
Table 3 shows the numerical solution for different values of β for the function
Table 3.
Compression between exact and approximation solutions.
Table 3.
Compression between exact and approximation solutions.
| Exact | The Method | Error | The Method | Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β = 1 | β = 0.95 | β = 0.99 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.1248 | 0.1298 | 0.0050 | 0.1257 | 0.0009 |
| 0.2496 | 0.2595 | 0.0099 | 0.2514 | 0.0018 |
| 0.3744 | 0.3893 | 0.0149 | 0.3771 | 0.0027 |
| 0.4992 | 0.5190 | 0.0198 | 0.5028 | 0.0036 |
| 0.6240 | 0.6488 | 0.0248 | 0.6285 | 0.0045 |
| 0.7488 | 0.7785 | 0.0297 | 0.7542 | 0.0054 |
| 0.8736 | 0.9083 | 0.0347 | 0.8799 | 0.0063 |
| 0.9984 | 1.0380 | 0.0396 | 1.0056 | 0.0072 |
| 1.1232 | 1.1678 | 0.0446 | 1.1313 | 0.0081 |
| 1.2480 | 1.2975 | 0.0495 | 1.2571 | 0.0091 |
Figure 3a offers a comparison between the exact solution and the numerical solution of Equation (50); at t = 1 and
, we get the exact solution; by taking different values of
, such as (,
), we gained the approximate solutions. Figure 3b shows the plot of function
in two-dimensions.
Figure 3.
(a): Comparison between exact and numerical solutions. (b): The surface of the function
.
In the following example, we apply the quadruple-generalized Laplace transform decomposition method.
Example 5.
Finally, the non-homogeneous fractional third-order dispersive partial differential equation in three dimensional space with the initial condition is defined:
and
Solution 4.
By employing the preceding method for Equation (54), we get
By operating the inverse on the right side, one can get
The first component is denoted by
The elements are offered by
For
at
, Equation (59) becomes
Hence,
This easily yields the approximation solution as follows:
The solution of Equation (54) is gained at
as follows:
Figure 4a introduces a comparison between the exact solution and the numerical solution of Equation (54); at t = 1 and
the exact solution is obtained; by taking different values of
, such as (,
), we get the approximate solutions. Figure 4b shows the plot of function
with
in four-dimensions.
Figure 4.
(a): Comparison between exact and numerical solutions. (b): The surface of the function
.
Table 4 shows the numerical solution for different values of β for the function
Table 4.
Compression between exact and approximation solutions.
Table 4.
Compression between exact and approximation solutions.
| Exact | The Method | Error | The Method | Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β = 1 | β = 0.95 | β = 0.99 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.0148 | 0.0163 | 0.0015 | 0.0153 | 0.0005 |
| 0.0536 | 0.0578 | 0.0042 | 0.0550 | 0.0014 |
| 0.0973 | 0.1036 | 0.0064 | 0.0994 | 0.0021 |
| 0.1161 | 0.1226 | 0.0065 | 0.1182 | 0.0021 |
| 0.0774 | 0.0812 | 0.0038 | 0.0787 | 0.0012 |
| −0.0458 | −0.0478 | 0.0020 | −0.0465 | 0.0007 |
| −0.2667 | −0.2768 | 0.0102 | −0.2700 | 0.0034 |
| −0.5775 | −0.5970 | 0.0195 | −0.5840 | 0.0065 |
| −0.9475 | −0.9759 | 0.0283 | −0.9569 | 0.0094 |
| −1.3242 | −1.3590 | 0.0349 | −1.3357 | 0.0116 |
4. Conclusions
In this study, the solution of the fractional time dispersive Kdv equation was introduced utilizing the MGLTDM. This method is a combination of MGLT and the DM. We examined four examples to check the effectiveness and ability of our method, demonstrating its faculty to approximate solutions for different problems. In addition, the acheived results show that this method can handle many problems that existing methods cannot handle.
Author Contributions
Methodology, H.E.; Software, D.E.E.; Formal analysis, H.E.; Investigation, H.E.; Resources, H.E.; Data curation, D.E.E.; Writing—original draft, H.E.; Writing—review & editing, D.E.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2024R948), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Korteweg, D.J.; de Vries, G. On the change of form of long waves advancing in a rectangular canal, and on a new type of long stationary waves. Philos. Mag. 1895, 39, 422–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenig, C.E.; Ponce, G.; Vega, L. A bilinear estimate with applications to the KdV equation. J. Am. Math. Soc. 1996, 9, 573–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veeresha, P.; Prakasha, D.G.; Singh, J. Solution for fractional forced KdV equation using fractional natural decomposition method. AIMS Math. 2020, 5, 798–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelil, A.S.; Appadu, A.R. On the Numerical Solution of 1D and 2D KdV Equations Using Variational Homotopy Perturbation and Finite Difference Methods. Mathematics 2022, 10, 4443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Areshi, M.; El-Tantawy, S.A.; Alotaibi, B.M.; Zaland, S. Study of Fuzzy Fractional Third-Order Dispersive KdV the equation in a Plasma under Atangana-Baleanu Derivative. J. Funct. 2022, 2022, 7922001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, R.; Khan, H.; Arif, M.; Kumam, P. Application of Laplace–Adomian Decomposition Method for the Analytical Solution of Third-Order Dispersive Fractional Partial Differential Equations. Entropy 2019, 21, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djidjeli, K.; Price, W.G.; Twizell, E.H.; Wang, Y. Numerical methods for the solution of the third-and fifth-order dispersive Korteweg-de Vries equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 1995, 58, 307–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prakash, A.; Kumar, M. Numerical method for fractional dispersive partial differential equations. Commun. Numer. Anal. 2017, 1, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akdi, M.; Sedra, M.B. Numerical KDV Equation by the Adomian Decomposition Method. Am. J. Mod. Phys. 2013, 2, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soliman, A.A.; Abdou, M.A. The decomposition method for solving the coupled modified KdV equations. Math. Comput. 2008, 47, 1035–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanth, A.R.; Aruna, K. Solution of fractional third-order dispersive partial differential equations. Egypt. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2015, 2, 190–199. [Google Scholar]
- Sultana, T.; Khan, A.; Khandelwal, P. A new non-polynomial spline method for solution of linear and non-linear third order dispersive equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018, 2018, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, R.K.; Mishra, H.K. Homotopy analysis Sumudu transform method for time-fractional third order dispersive partial differential equation. Adv. Comput. Math. 2017, 43, 365–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nuruddeen, R.I.; Akbar, Y.; Kim, H.J. On the application of Gα integral transform to nonlinear dynamical models with non-integer order derivatives. AIMS Math. 2022, 7, 17859–17878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.J.; Sattaso, S.; Nonlaopon, K.; Kaewnimit, K. An application of generalized Laplace transform in PDEs. Adv. Dyn. Syst. Appl. 2019, 14, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasertsang, P.; Sattaso, S.; Nonlaopon, K.; Kim, H.J. Analytical study for certain ordinary differential equations with variable coefficients via Gα-transform. Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2021, 14, 1184–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sattaso, S.; Nonlaopon, K.; Kim, H.; Al-Omari, S. Certain Solutions of Abel’s Integral Equations on Distribution Spaces via Distributional Gα-Transform. Symmetry 2023, 15, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eltayeb, H.; Alhefthi, R.K. Solution of Fractional Third-Order Dispersive Partial Differential Equations and Symmetric KdV via Sumudu–Generalized Laplace Transform Decomposition. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sattaso, S.; Nonlaopon, K.; Kim, H. Further Properties of Laplace–Type Integral Transform. Dyn. Syst. Appl. 2019, 28, 195–215. [Google Scholar]
- Ghandehari, M.A.M.; Ranjbar, M. A numerical method for solving a fractional partial differential equation through converting it into an NLP problem. Comput. Math. Appl. 2013, 65, 975–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayrak, M.A.; Demir, A. A new approach for space-time fractional partial differential equations by residual power series method. Appl. Math. Comput. 2018, 336, 215–230. [Google Scholar]
- Thabet, H.; Kendre, S. Analytical solutions for conformable space-time fractional partial differential equations via fractional differential transform. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2018, 109, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eltayeb, H.; Bachar, I.; Abdalla, Y.T. A note on time-fractional Navier–Stokes equation and multi-Laplace transform decomposition method. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eltayeb, H.; Mesloub, S. The New G-Double-Laplace Transforms and One-Dimensional Coupled Sine-Gordon Equations. Axioms 2024, 13, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eltayeb, H. Analytic Solution of the Time-Fractional Partial Differential Equation Using a Multi-G-Laplace Transform Method. Fractal Fract. 2024, 8, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).