Multifractal Characteristics of the Pore Structure and Resistance to Chloride Ion Penetration of Cement Mortar Modified with a Waterborne Nanosilicate-Based Densifier
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Mixture Design and Specimen Preparation
2.3. Compressive Strength Test
2.4. Test on Chlorine Ion Permeation Performance
2.5. Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP)
2.6. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TG/DTG)
2.7. Multifractal Analysis
2.8. Gray Relational Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Compressive Strength
3.2. Resistance to Chloride Ion Penetration
3.2.1. Electric Flux
3.2.2. Chloride Migration Coefficients
3.3. Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP)
3.3.1. Pore Size Distribution
3.3.2. Characteristic Parameters of Pore Structure
3.4. Multifractal Analysis
3.4.1. Multifractal Characteristics Verifiability Calculation
3.4.2. Generalized Dimension Spectrum
3.4.3. Multifractal Singularity Spectrum
3.5. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TG/DTG)
4. Further Discussion
4.1. Relationship Between Multifractal Parameters and Traditional Characteristic Parameters of Pore Structure
4.2. Gray Relational Analysis of Multifractal Parameters and Chloride Ion Migration Coefficients
4.3. Mechanistic Discussion Based on TG, MIP and Multifractal Results
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The addition of the CF-S5 admixture can enhance the resistance to the chloride ion penetration of mortar without compromising its mechanical properties. Among the different dosages of the CF-S5 admixture, 0.1% has the best effect. Compared with the control specimen, the electric flux and chloride ion migration coefficient decreased by about 33.4% and 32.1%, respectively.
- (2)
- The addition of the CF-S5 admixture did not reduce the degree of cement paste hydration or alter the primary types of hydration products. Concurrently, the CF-S5 admixture promoted the formation of calcium carbonate and partial CS-H gel, thereby facilitating pore filling in the mortar.
- (3)
- MIP analysis indicates that the CF-S5 admixture improves the pore structure of mortar by reducing the total porosity and fraction of the harmful pore volume, refining the pore structure, and increasing pore tortuosity.
- (4)
- Multifractal analysis shows that the addition of the CF-S5 admixture changes the multifractal characteristics of the mortar pore structure. Specifically, the addition of the CF-S5 admixture reduces the connectivity and distribution uniformity of the mortar’s pore structure and enhances its complexity and spatial heterogeneity.
- (5)
- The multifractal parameters exhibit significant correlations with traditional characteristic pore structure parameters and can serve as a comprehensive index for characterizing mortar pore structure. In addition, there is a good gray relational degree and linear correlation between the multifractal parameters and the chloride ion migration coefficient, in which D1, D2 and H can be used as potential indicators to characterize and predict the resistance to the chloride ion penetration of mortar.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zheng, Y.; Fan, C.; Ma, J.; Wang, S. Review of Research on Bond–Slip of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 385, 131437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Feng, P.; Shen, X.; Rong, H.; Miao, C.; Geng, G. Mitigating Chloride Attack in Cementitious Materials without Compromising Other Properties via the Use of Viscosity Modifying Admixture. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2024, 147, 105441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Zhu, H.; He, Z.; Yang, L.; Zhao, L.; Wen, C. Experimental Investigation on Chloride-Ion Penetration Resistance of Slag Containing Fiber-Reinforced Concrete under Drying-Wetting Cycles. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 274, 121829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexander, M.; Beushausen, H. Durability, Service Life Prediction, and Modelling for Reinforced Concrete Structures—Review and Critique. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 122, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, R.; Wan-Wendner, L.; Yang, C.; Zhao, R.; Ye, Z.; Kong, D.; Zhang, Y. Investigations on Carbon-Sequestration Optimization of Recycled Coarse-Aggregate and Its Effects on Concrete Performances. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 90, 109453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghafari, E.; Feys, D.; Khayat, K. Feasibility of Using Natural SCMs in Concrete for Infrastructure Applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 127, 724–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navarro, I.J.; Martí, J.V.; Yepes, V. Reliability-Based Maintenance Optimization of Corrosion Preventive Designs under a Life Cycle Perspective. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2019, 74, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noushini, A.; Castel, A.; Aldred, J.; Rawal, A. Chloride Diffusion Resistance and Chloride Binding Capacity of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2020, 105, 103290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Zhang, T.; Du, J.; Wang, C.; Wei, J.; Yu, Q. Evaluating the Chloride Diffusion Coefficient of Cement Mortars Based on the Tortuosity of Pore Structurally-Designed Cement Pastes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2021, 317, 111018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basheer, L.; Kropp, J.; Cleland, D.J. Assessment of the Durability of Concrete from Its Permeation Properties: A Review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2001, 15, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, B.; Zhou, Z.; Cheng, X.; Du, P.; Xu, H. ITZ Properties of Concrete with Carbonated Steel Slag Aggregate in Salty Freeze-Thaw Environment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 114, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Ba, M.; Yi, B.; Liu, J. Experimental and Numerical Investigation on the Effect of Cracks on Chloride Diffusion and Steel Corrosion in Concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 86, 108521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, H.; Jin, X.; Fu, C.; Jin, N.; Xu, Y.; Huang, T. Chloride Penetration in Concrete Exposed to Cyclic Drying-Wetting and Carbonation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 112, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.; Shi, C.; Li, J.; Wu, Z. Chloride Migration in Cement Mortars with Ultra-Low Water to Binder Ratio. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 118, 103974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tam, C.M.; Tam, V.W.Y.; Ng, K.M. Assessing Drying Shrinkage and Water Permeability of Reactive Powder Concrete Produced in Hong Kong. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 26, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Wu, Z.; Shi, C.; Yuan, Q.; Zhang, Z. Durability of Ultra-High Performance Concrete—A Review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 255, 119296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddique, R.; Bennacer, R. Use of Iron and Steel Industry By-Product (GGBS) in Cement Paste and Mortar. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 69, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, K.; Shi, H.; Xu, L.; Ye, G.; De Schutter, G. Microstructural Characterization of ITZ in Blended Cement Concretes and Its Relation to Transport Properties. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 79, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amran, M.; Murali, G.; Khalid, N.H.A.; Fediuk, R.; Ozbakkaloglu, T.; Lee, Y.H.; Haruna, S.; Lee, Y.Y. Slag Uses in Making an Ecofriendly and Sustainable Concrete: A Review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 272, 121942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Jin, M.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, S. Hydration, Shrinkage, Pore Structure and Fractal Dimension of Silica Fume Modified Low Heat Portland Cement-Based Materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 272, 121952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, M.K.; Dawson, A.R.; Thom, N.H. Macro/Micro-Pore Structure Characteristics and the Chloride Penetration of Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating Different Types of Filler and Mineral Admixture. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 72, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, H.; Gao, H.J.; Pang, S.D. Improvement in Concrete Resistance against Water and Chloride Ingress by Adding Graphene Nanoplatelet. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 83, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uthaman, S.; George, R.P.; Vishwakarma, V.; Harilal, M.; Philip, J. Enhanced Seawater Corrosion Resistance of Reinforcement in Nanophase Modified Fly Ash Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 221, 232–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Xiao, H.; Guan, X.; Wang, Z.; Yu, L. Chloride Diffusion in Concrete Containing Nano-TiO2 under Coupled Effect of Scouring. Compos. Part B Eng. 2014, 56, 698–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sumesh, M.; Alengaram, U.J.; Jumaat, M.Z.; Mo, K.H.; Alnahhal, M.F. Incorporation of Nano-Materials in Cement Composite and Geopolymer Based Paste and Mortar—A Review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 148, 62–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, P.; Xu, J.; Guo, M.-Z.; Wang, Z. Laboratory Investigation of the Chloride Ingress into Cement Mortar Incorporating a Novel Core–Shell Nanomaterial. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 379, 131306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, X.; Shi, Z.; Shi, C.; Ling, T.-C.; Li, N. A Review on Concrete Surface Treatment Part I: Types and Mechanisms. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 132, 578–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Hunag, X.; Wu, Y.-Y.; Deng, X.; Zheng, Z.; Yang, B. Studies on Mechanical Properties and Durability of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Incorporating Graphene Oxide. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022, 130, 104508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matar, P.; Barhoun, J. Effects of Waterproofing Admixture on the Compressive Strength and Permeability of Recycled Aggregate Concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 32, 101521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Yu, C.; Shu, X.; Ran, Q.; Yang, Y. Recent Advance of Chemical Admixtures in Concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 124, 105834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yu, L.; Wu, F.; Jiang, J.; Yang, H.; Bi, R.; Yu, Y. Novel Ca-SLS-LDH Nanocomposites Obtained via Lignosulfonate Modification for Corrosion Protection of Steel Bars in Simulated Concrete Pore Solution. Appl. Clay Sci. 2021, 211, 106195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Lei, S.; Ou, J.; Li, W. Effect of PDMS on the Waterproofing Performance and Corrosion Resistance of Cement Mortar. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 507, 145016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruan, S.; Chen, S.; Lu, J.; Zeng, Q.; Liu, Y.; Yan, D. Waterproof Geopolymer Composites Modified by Hydrophobic Particles and Polydimethylsiloxane. Compos. Part B Eng. 2022, 237, 109865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Souza Oliveira, A.; Da Fonseca Martins Gomes, O.; Ferrara, L.; De Moraes Rego Fairbairn, E.; Toledo Filho, R.D. An Overview of a Twofold Effect of Crystalline Admixtures in Cement-Based Materials: From Permeability-Reducers to Self-Healing Stimulators. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 41, 102400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Lu, R.; Li, Y.; Guan, X. Effect of Crystalline Admixtures on Mechanical, Self-Healing and Transport Properties of Engineered Cementitious Composite. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 124, 104256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plank, J.; Sakai, E.; Miao, C.W.; Yu, C.; Hong, J.X. Chemical Admixtures—Chemistry, Applications and Their Impact on Concrete Microstructure and Durability. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 78, 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karakuzu, K.; Kobya, V.; Mardani-Aghabaglou, A.; Felekoğlu, B.; Ramyar, K. Adsorption Properties of Polycarboxylate Ether-Based High Range Water Reducing Admixture on Cementitious Systems: A Review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 312, 125366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alonso, M.M.; Palacios, M.; Puertas, F. Compatibility between Polycarboxylate-Based Admixtures and Blended-Cement Pastes. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2013, 35, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, D.; Wen, A.; Mu, D.; Tang, A.; Jiang, L.; Yang, W. Investigation into Compressive Property, Chloride Ion Permeability, and Pore Fractal Characteristics of the Cement Mortar Incorporated with Zeolite Powder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 411, 134522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Wang, B.; Yuan, Q.; Huang, D.; Peng, H. Characterization, Factors, and Fractal Dimension of Pore Structure of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 26, 3395–3407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; Jiang, J.; De Schutter, G.; Ye, G.; Sun, W. Fractal and Multifractal Analysis on Pore Structure in Cement Paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 69, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, X.; Feng, J.; Wang, B. Relationship between Fractal Feature and Compressive Strength of Fly Ash-Cement Composite Cementitious Materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 139, 105052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, S.; Huang, J.; Duan, L.; Yu, P.; Chen, E. A Review on Fractal Footprint of Cement-Based Materials. Powder Technol. 2020, 370, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, T.; Guo, R.; Yan, Y.; Fu, C.; Lin, R. Texture Feature Analysis of the Microstructure of Cement-Based Materials During Hydration. Fractal Fract. 2025, 9, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torre, I.G.; Martín-Sotoca, J.J.; Losada, J.C.; López, P.; Tarquis, A.M. Scaling Properties of Binary and Greyscale Images in the Context of X-Ray Soil Tomography. Geoderma 2020, 365, 114205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Sotoca, J.J.; Saa-Requejo, A.; Grau, J.B.; Tarquis, A.M. New Segmentation Method Based on Fractal Properties Using Singularity Maps. Geoderma 2017, 287, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, K.; Ostadhassan, M.; Zou, J.; Gentzis, T.; Rezaee, R.; Bubach, B.; Carvajal-Ortiz, H. Multifractal Analysis of Gas Adsorption Isotherms for Pore Structure Characterization of the Bakken Shale. Fuel 2018, 219, 296–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, M.; Liu, X.; Jin, Z.; Lai, J. The Heterogeneity of Pore Structure in Lacustrine Shales: Insights from Multifractal Analysis Using N2 Adsorption and Mercury Intrusion. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2020, 114, 104150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Duan, C.; Li, G.; Fu, X.; Zhong, Q.; Liu, H.; Dong, Z. Determinations of the Multifractal Characteristics of the Pore Structures of Low-, Middle-, and High-Rank Coal Using High-Pressure Mercury Injection. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2021, 203, 108656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Liu, H.; Song, X. Multifractal Analysis of Hg Pore Size Distributions of Tectonically Deformed Coals. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2015, 144–145, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Hong, G.; Oh, S.; Choi, S. Application of Various Fractal Models in Characterizing the Morphology of Pore Structures of Hydrating Cement Pastes. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 20, 3818–3835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, S.; Zhang, J.; Han, S. Fractal Analysis of Relation between Strength and Pore Structure of Hardened Mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 135, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, L.; Carrillo, J.; Cao, M.; Sha, G. Multifractal-Spectrum Shape Parameters for Characterizing Distribution and Evolution of Multiple Cracks in Concrete Structures. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2022, 264, 108329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, X.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y. Investigation on Pore Structure and Multifractal of Tight Sandstone Reservoirs in Coal Bearing Strata Using LF-NMR Measurements. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2020, 187, 106757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Ding, S.; Ashour, A.; Yu, F.; Lv, X.; Han, B. Micro-Nano Scale Pore Structure and Fractal Dimension of Ultra-High Performance Cementitious Composites Modified with Nanofillers. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 141, 105129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, M.; Zou, C.; Xin, D. Pore Structure Evolution Mechanism of Cement Mortar Containing Diatomite Subjected to Freeze-Thaw Cycles by Multifractal Analysis. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2020, 114, 103731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, S.; Luo, L.; Qin, Y.; Li, Y. Study on the Effect of Cellulose Nanocrystals on the Pore Structure and Drying Shrinkage of Alkali-Activated Recycled Ultra-High Performance Concrete: A Multifractal Theory. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 463, 140113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 17671-2021; Test Method of Cement Mortar Strength (ISO Method). National Standard of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2021.
- GB/T 2419-2005; Test Method for Fluidity of Cement Mortar. Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2005.
- ASTM C1202-19; Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019.
- ASTM D4404-21; Standard Test Method for Determination of Pore Volume and Pore Volume Distribution of Soil and Rock by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
- Snellings, R.; Chwast, J.; Cizer, Ö.; De Belie, N.; Dhandapani, Y.; Durdzinski, P.; Elsen, J.; Haufe, J.; Hooton, D.; Patapy, C.; et al. RILEM TC-238 SCM Recommendation on Hydration Stoppage by Solvent Exchange for the Study of Hydrate Assemblages. Mater. Struct. 2018, 51, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pane, I.; Hansen, W. Investigation of Blended Cement Hydration by Isothermal Calorimetry and Thermal Analysis. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1155–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monteagudo, S.M.; Moragues, A.; Gálvez, J.C.; Casati, M.J.; Reyes, E. The Degree of Hydration Assessment of Blended Cement Pastes by Differential Thermal and Thermogravimetric Analysis. Morphological Evolution of the Solid Phases. Thermochim. Acta 2014, 592, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatty, J.I. Hydration versus Strength in a Portland Cement Developed from Domestic Mineral Wastes—A Comparative Study. Thermochim. Acta 1986, 106, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ju-Long, D. Control Problems of Grey Systems. Syst. Control Lett. 1982, 1, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, D.; Xu, J.; Han, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X. Study on the Correlation between Pore Structure Characterization and Early Mechanical Properties of Foamed Concrete Based on X-CT. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 450, 138603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sengul, O. Use of Electrical Resistivity as an Indicator for Durability. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 73, 434–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bassuoni, M.; Nehdi, M.; Greenough, T. Enhancing the Reliability of Evaluating Chloride Ingress in Concrete Using the ASTM C 1202 Rapid Chloride Penetrability Test. J. ASTM Int. 2006, 3, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Julio-Betancourt, G.A.; Hooton, R.D. Study of the Joule Effect on Rapid Chloride Permeability Values and Evaluation of Related Electrical Properties of Concretes. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004, 34, 1007–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moffatt, E.G.; Thomas, M.D.A.; Fahim, A. Performance of High-Volume Fly Ash Concrete in Marine Environment. Cem. Concr. Res. 2017, 102, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, P.; Wei, J.; Zhang, T.; Hu, J.; Yu, Q. Modification of Chloride Diffusion Coefficient of Concrete Based on the Electrical Conductivity of Pore Solution. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 145, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halamickova, P.; Detwiler, R.J.; Bentz, D.P.; Garboczi, E.J. Water Permeability and Chloride Ion Diffusion in Portland Cement Mortars: Relationship to Sand Content and Critical Pore Diameter. Cem. Concr. Res. 1995, 25, 790–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Ma, Y.; Hu, J.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z. Review on Chloride Transport in Alkali-Activated Materials: Role of Precursors, Activators and Admixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 328, 127081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bo-Ming, Y.; Jian-Hua, L. A Geometry Model for Tortuosity of Flow Path in Porous Media. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2004, 21, 1569–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, D.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Su, L.; Tian, J. Advanced Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Technology Analysis of Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Concrete for Optimized Pore Structure and Strength. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 467, 140383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muller, J. Characterization of Pore Space in Chalk by Multifractal Analysis. J. Hydrol. 1996, 187, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paz Ferreiro, J.; Vidal Vázquez, E. Multifractal Analysis of Hg Pore Size Distributions in Soils with Contrasting Structural Stability. Geoderma 2010, 160, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Q.; Li, K.; Fen-Chong, T.; Dangla, P. Surface Fractal Analysis of Pore Structure of High-Volume Fly-Ash Cement Pastes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 762–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, X.; Wang, B.; Feng, J. Relationship between Fractal Feature and Compressive Strength of Concrete Based on MIP. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 322, 126504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, D.; Li, D.; Hua, P.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, G. Statistical Modelling of Compressive Strength Controlled by Porosity and Pore Size Distribution for Cementitious Materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 96, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Liu, W.; Liu, X. Scale-Dependent Nature of the Surface Fractal Dimension for Bi- and Multi-Disperse Porous Solids by Mercury Porosimetry. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 253, 1349–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Pan, T.; Yang, Y.; Qi, R.; Guan, D.; Dong, K.; Lin, R.-S.; Guo, R. Fractal Feature of Manufactured Sand Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) Based on MIP. Fractal Fract. 2025, 9, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caniego, F.J.; Martı́, M.A.; San José, F. Rényi Dimensions of Soil Pore Size Distribution. Geoderma 2003, 112, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- San José Martínez, F.; Martín, M.A.; Caniego, F.J.; Tuller, M.; Guber, A.; Pachepsky, Y.; García-Gutiérrez, C. Multifractal Analysis of Discretized X-Ray CT Images for the Characterization of Soil Macropore Structures. Geoderma 2010, 156, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Liang, Z.; Lai, Z.; Wu, Y.; Shi, X.; Duan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y. Study on the Multifractal Characterization and Seepage of the Shale Matrix: A Case Study of the Longmaxi Formation in Southwestern Sichuan Basin, China. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2024, 238, 212924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, P.; Xia, Z.; Wang, P.; Ding, W.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Peng, Y. Fractal and Multifractal Analysis of Pore Size Distribution in Low Permeability Reservoirs Based on Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry. Energies 2019, 12, 1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Wei, C.; Chu, X.; Vandeginste, V.; Ju, W. Multifractal Analysis in Characterizing Adsorption Pore Heterogeneity of Middle- and High-Rank Coal Reservoirs. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 19385–19401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, B.; Zhu, Y.; Feng, G.; Xiang, J.; Wang, Y. Matrix Compression and Pore Heterogeneity in the Coal-Measure Shale Reservoirs of the Qinshui Basin: A Multifractal Analysis. Fractal Fract. 2024, 8, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lan, X.; Zeng, X.; Zhu, H.; Long, G.; Xie, Y. Experimental Investigation on Fractal Characteristics of Pores in Air-Entrained Concrete at Low Atmospheric Pressure. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022, 130, 104509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Q.; Luo, M.; Pang, X.; Li, L.; Li, K. Surface Fractal Dimension: An Indicator to Characterize the Microstructure of Cement-Based Porous Materials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 282, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Choi, Y.C.; Choi, S. Fractal Characteristics of Pore Structures in GGBFS-Based Cement Pastes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 428, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; Niu, D.; Fu, Q.; Luo, D. Fractal Characteristics of Pore Structure of Hybrid Basalt–Polypropylene Fibre-Reinforced Concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2020, 109, 103555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.; Cui, S.; Li, Z.; Xu, X.; Guo, C. Influence of Surrounding Rock Temperature on Mechanical Property and Pore Structure of Concrete for Shotcrete Use in a Hot-Dry Environment of High-Temperature Geothermal Tunnel. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 207, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Li, S. Determination of the Surface Fractal Dimension for Porous Media by Mercury Porosimetry. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 34, 1383–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Wang, F.; He, X.; Su, Y. Pore Structure of Affected Zone around Saturated and Large Superabsorbent Polymers in Cement Paste. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 97, 54–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, L.; Chen, S.; Liao, B.; Chen, D.; Lv, Z.; Zhang, S.; Guo, M.; Rong, H.; Xiang, T. Silica Fume Modified Superhydrophobic Cement-Based Materials with Enhanced Anti-Corrosion Property and Its Mechanism. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 489, 142405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, N.; Li, H.; Liu, W.; Jiao, X.; Zheng, W.; Yan, Z.; Yuan, W.; Zhou, Z.; Mai, Q.; Zhang, L.; et al. Mechanical Strength, Hydration Products, and Microstructure of Waste-Derived Composite-Activated Cementitious Materials by Varying Titanium Gypsum Phase Composition. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 456, 139328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Fang, J.; Cheng, L.; He, X.; Su, Y.; Tan, H. Mechanical Performance, Hydration Characteristics and Microstructures of High Volume Blast Furnace Ferronickel Slag Cement Mortar by Wet Grinding Activation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 320, 126148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaker, Z.; Hosseini, A.; Azizi, S.; Habibnejad Korayem, A. An Atomic Approach to Pore Refinement in Concrete: Carbon Dioxide to Carbonate Calcium. Cem. Concr. Res. 2023, 172, 107241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Chu, H.; Yao, N.; Long, B.; Li, W.; Jiang, L. Experimental Study of Styrene-Acrylic Emulsion Modified Mortar with Manufactured Sand and Its Performance Exposed to Combined Chloride-Sulfate Attack. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 458, 139682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munemo, R.; Kruger, J.; Van Zijl, G.P.A.G. Surface Treatment of 3DPC Interlayers with Silicate-Based Solution for Enhanced Interfacial Bonding. Cem. Concr. Res. 2025, 196, 107948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Z.; Xue, X.; Li, Y.; Yang, J.; He, Z.; Shen, S.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, W.; Xu, L.; Zhang, H.; et al. Experimental Exploration of the Waterproofing Mechanism of Inorganic Sodium Silicate-Based Concrete Sealers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 104, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.; Zhang, M.; Wu, H. Gray Correlation Analysis between Mechanical Performance and Pore Characteristics of Permeable Concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 86, 108793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, A.; Lin, S.; Guo, Y.; He, T.; Lyu, Z. Relationship between Flexural Strength and Pore Structure of Pavement Concrete under Fatigue Loads and Freeze-Thaw Interaction in Seasonal Frozen Regions. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 174, 684–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prusty, J.K.; Pradhan, B. Multi-Response Optimization Using Taguchi-Grey Relational Analysis for Composition of Fly Ash-Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Based Geopolymer Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 241, 118049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Xie, X.; Liu, R.; Lyu, K.; Zuo, J.; Li, S.; Liu, L.; Shah, S.P. Research on the Durability of Nano-SiO2 and Sodium Silicate Co-Modified Recycled Coarse Aggregate (RCA) Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 378, 131185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.-M.; Heo, Y.-S.; Kang, S.-P.; Lee, J. Effect of Sodium Silicate- and Ethyl Silicate-Based Nano-Silica on Pore Structure of Cement Composites. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2014, 49, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]















| Materials | CaO | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | K2O | TiO2 | Na2O | SO3 | MgO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | 62.21 | 19.42 | 3.51 | 6.20 | 0.78 | 1.23 | 0.35 | 3.93 | 1.95 |
| Mix Designation | Cement (C = 1) a | Standard Sand (S/C) a | Water (W/C) a | Water-Reducing Agent (% by Mass of Cement) | CF-S5 Dosage (% by Mass of Cement) | Fluidity (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPC | 1 | 2.85 | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.0 | 190 |
| S5-0.1 | 1 | 2.85 | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.1 | 195 |
| S5-0.2 | 1 | 2.85 | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.2 | 195 |
| S5-0.3 | 1 | 2.85 | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.3 | 200 |
| Mix Designation | Age (d) | Compressive Strength (MPa) | St. Dev. (MPa) a | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPC | 3 | 33.8 | 1.52 | |
| 7 | 42.1 | 2.51 | ||
| 28 | 53.7 | 1.24 | ||
| S5-0.1 | 3 | 36.0 | 0.68 | 0.106 |
| 7 | 42.5 | 1.10 | 0.730 | |
| 28 | 55.3 | 2.78 | 0.267 | |
| S5-0.2 | 3 | 35.6 | 1.68 | 0.269 |
| 7 | 42.2 | 1.42 | 0.909 | |
| 28 | 53.1 | 1.76 | 0.517 | |
| S5-0.3 | 3 | 33.7 | 1.58 | 0.487 |
| 7 | 43.2 | 0.72 | 0.338 | |
| 28 | 53.7 | 2.07 | 0.914 |
| Mix Designation | Total Porosity (%) | Total Pore Volume (mL/g) | Median Pore Diameter (Volume) (nm) | Most Probable Pore Diameter (nm) | Pore Tortuosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPC | 10.06 | 0.470 | 90.96 | 95.62 | 5.336 |
| S5-0.1 | 9.28 | 0.397 | 67.02 | 62.66 | 5.773 |
| S5-0.2 | 9.32 | 0.414 | 67.08 | 62.66 | 5.750 |
| S5-0.3 | 9.59 | 0.431 | 69.51 | 77.32 | 5.599 |
| Mix Designation | D0 | D1 | D2 | H | D−10 | D10 | D−10 − D10 | D−10 − D0 | D0 − D10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPC | 1.0000 | 0.8788 | 0.8008 | 0.9004 | 1.8846 | 0.6080 | 1.2766 | 0.8846 | 0.3920 |
| S5-0.1 | 1.0000 | 0.8664 | 0.7818 | 0.8909 | 1.9454 | 0.5882 | 1.3572 | 0.9454 | 0.4118 |
| S5-0.2 | 1.0000 | 0.8683 | 0.7855 | 0.8927 | 1.9448 | 0.5948 | 1.3500 | 0.9448 | 0.4052 |
| S5-0.3 | 1.0000 | 0.8692 | 0.7859 | 0.8930 | 1.9122 | 0.5956 | 1.3166 | 0.9122 | 0.4044 |
| Mix Designation | α0 | α−10 | α10 | α−10 − α10 | α−10 − α0 | α0 − α10 | Rd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPC | 1.2207 | 2.0709 | 0.5507 | 1.5202 | 0.8502 | 0.6700 | −0.1802 |
| S5-0.1 | 1.2497 | 2.1375 | 0.5325 | 1.6050 | 0.8878 | 0.7172 | −0.1706 |
| S5-0.2 | 1.2336 | 2.1391 | 0.5387 | 1.6004 | 0.9055 | 0.6849 | −0.2106 |
| S5-0.3 | 1.2217 | 2.1033 | 0.5395 | 1.5638 | 0.8816 | 0.6822 | −0.1994 |
| Mix Designation | Ds | D<10nm | D10–100nm | D100–1000nm | D>1000nm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPC | 2.7671 | 2.6093 | 2.5786 | 2.7690 | 2.8139 |
| S5-0.1 | 2.7914 | 2.7017 | 2.6497 | 2.8220 | 2.8383 |
| S5-0.2 | 2.7847 | 2.5988 | 2.6442 | 2.7775 | 2.8303 |
| S5-0.3 | 2.7846 | 2.6156 | 2.6220 | 2.7899 | 2.8302 |
| Parameters | D1 | D2 | H | D−10 − D10 | D−10 − D0 | D0 − D10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total porosity | 0.970 * | 0.957 * | 0.957 * | −0.994 ** | −0.984 * | −0.947 |
| Total pore volume | 0.969 * | 0.963 * | 0.963 * | −0.986 * | −0.963 * | −0.984 * |
| Median pore diameter | 0.988 * | 0.984 * | 0.984 * | −0.922 | −0.894 | −0.925 |
| Most probable Pore diameter | 0.948 | 0.931 | 0.931 | −0.996 ** | −0.994 ** | −0.923 |
| Pore tortuosity | −0.970 * | −0.957 * | −0.957 * | 0.955 ** | 0.984 * | 0.948 |
| Parameters | D1 | D2 | H | D−10 − D10 | D−10 − D0 | D0 − D10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dnssm | 0.7739 | 0.7780 | 0.7723 | 0.6944 | 0.6823 | 0.7224 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wang, X.; Guo, R.; Xia, H.; Guan, D.; Liu, Z. Multifractal Characteristics of the Pore Structure and Resistance to Chloride Ion Penetration of Cement Mortar Modified with a Waterborne Nanosilicate-Based Densifier. Fractal Fract. 2026, 10, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10010058
Wang X, Guo R, Xia H, Guan D, Liu Z. Multifractal Characteristics of the Pore Structure and Resistance to Chloride Ion Penetration of Cement Mortar Modified with a Waterborne Nanosilicate-Based Densifier. Fractal and Fractional. 2026; 10(1):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10010058
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Xin, Rongxin Guo, Haiting Xia, Dian Guan, and Zhuo Liu. 2026. "Multifractal Characteristics of the Pore Structure and Resistance to Chloride Ion Penetration of Cement Mortar Modified with a Waterborne Nanosilicate-Based Densifier" Fractal and Fractional 10, no. 1: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10010058
APA StyleWang, X., Guo, R., Xia, H., Guan, D., & Liu, Z. (2026). Multifractal Characteristics of the Pore Structure and Resistance to Chloride Ion Penetration of Cement Mortar Modified with a Waterborne Nanosilicate-Based Densifier. Fractal and Fractional, 10(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10010058

