Next Article in Journal
An Integrative Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach to Analyze Fine-Scale Land-Cover and Land-Use Factors Associated with Spatial Distributions of Place of Residence of Reported Dengue Cases
Next Article in Special Issue
Dengue as a Disease Threatening Global Health: A Narrative Review Focusing on Latin America and Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of the General Population toward the Old-New Outbreak of Cholera in a Developing Country
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detection of the Xanthi Chryso-like Virus in New Geographical Area and a Novel Arthropod Carrier
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
TropicalMed
Volume 8
Issue 4
10.3390/tropicalmed8040237
tropicalmed-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

First Isolation and Genome Sequence Analysis of West Nile Virus in Mosquitoes in Brazil

by
Joaquim Pinto Nunes Neto
1,*,
Lúcia Aline Moura Reis
2,
Maria Nazaré Oliveira Freitas
1,
Bruna Laís Sena do Nascimento
1,
Liliane Leal das Chagas
1,
Hernan Hermes Monteiro da Costa
3,
Jéssica Cecília Pinheiro Rodrigues
4,
Camila Margalho Braga
2,
Eliana Vieira Pinto da Silva
1,
Sandro Patroca Silva
1 and
Lívia Caricio Martins
1
1
Arbovirology and Hemorrhagic Fevers Section, Evandro Chagas Institute, Ananindeua 67030-000, PA, Brazil
2
Graduate Program in Parasitary Biology in the Amazon, Center of Biological and Health Sciences, State University of Pará, Belém 66095-663, PA, Brazil
3
Immunology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo 01246-000, SP, Brazil
4
Laboratory Animal Husbandry and Production Section, Evandro Chagas Institute, Ananindeua 67030-000, PA, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8(4), 237; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8040237
Submission received: 21 February 2023 / Revised: 27 March 2023 / Accepted: 27 March 2023 / Published: 20 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Topics in Arbovirus Vectors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
West Nile virus is a flavivirus transmitted by mosquitoes, mainly of the genus Culex. In Brazil, serological studies have already indicated the circulation of the virus since 2003, with the first human case detected in 2014. The objective of the present paper is to report the first isolation of WNV in a Culex (Melanoconion) mosquito. Arthropods were collected by protected human attraction and CDC light bait, and taxonomically identified and analyzed by viral isolation, complement fixation and genomic sequencing tests. WNV was isolated from samples of Culex (Melanoconion) mosquitoes, and the sequencing analysis demonstrated that the isolated strain belonged to lineage 1a. The finding of the present study presents the first evidence of the isolation and genome sequencing of WNV in arthropods in Brazil.

1. Introduction

West Nile virus (WNV) is a mosquito-borne flavivirus of the family Flaviviridae, genus Flavivirus, transmitted by the bite of mosquitoes, primarily of the genus Culex. Natural hosts are some wild bird species, which act as amplifiers and infection sources for mosquitoes [1,2,3].
WNV is an RNA virus consisting of approximately 11,029 nucleotides (nt), surrounded by a 35-nm inner capsid consisting of multiple copies of a capsid protein (C), and surrounded by an outer layer containing structural envelope (E) and membrane (M) proteins. The genome also encodes seven non-structural (NS) proteins that are involved in the replication and maturation of the virus (NS1, NS2a, NS2b, NS3, NS4a, NS4b, and NS5) [4,5,6].
WNV infection may cause oligosymptomatic to severe and fatal cases of encephalitis [7,8], with 70% to 80% of infected persons presenting asymptomatic cases; 20% to 30% presenting fever, headache, myalgia, malaise, chills, and diaphoresis; and only 1 in 150 infected persons presenting central nervous system (CNS) involvement, with a higher risk of occurrence in patients over 50 years of age and in immunocompromised persons [8,9,10,11,12].
WNV was introduced in the Americas in 1999 in the United States, followed by Canada [13], Mexico [14,15], and Venezuela [16].
In Brazil, serological findings in birds, horses, and other animals have indicated the circulation of the virus since 2003. However, the first human case of West Nile fever was only documented in 2014, in Piauí, through a strategy of investigation of neurological syndromes [17]. In April 2018, a fragment of the viral genome was detected in Espírito Santo due to the occurrence of an equine epizootic with neurological manifestations, and genetic sequencing confirmed the presence of WNV [18]. Recently, in September 2019, the WNV genome was detected in a horse in the municipality of Boa Viagem during equine epizootic investigations in several municipalities of Ceará State [19].
In 2021, the Epidemiological Bulletin (vol. 52, no. 41) of the Secretariat of Health Surveillance highlighted West Nile fever as one of the zoonotic diseases that present a high risk to public health in Brazil [20].
Culex mosquitoes, which are considered the primary vectors of WNV, have a cosmopolitan distribution and include approximately 768 species divided into 26 subgenera [21,22]. Many of these species are well adapted to the urban environment, where they find suitable breeding grounds for reproduction, as the females lay their eggs in small collections of stagnant water containing high levels of organic matter [23,24,25].
Arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) are a major health threat in several countries, especially those with tropical climates. This is due to the great potential of vectors to spread and adapt to different environments and hosts, and to the fact that the temperature is favorable for viral replication. Climate change and anthropic activities such as deforestation due to uncontrolled occupation, mining, and population migration are also factors that contribute to viral amplification and transmission, as well as the emergence and re-emergence of arboviruses. These factors alter the natural habitats of the vectors, increasing the risk of human exposure to these viruses [26,27,28,29,30].
The objective of the present paper is to report the first isolation of WNV in a Culex (Melanoconion) mosquito pool collected during a vector surveillance study in the southeastern part of Pará State, Brazil.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Epidemiological Investigation of Arboviruses

The Arbovirology and Hemorrhagic Fevers Section (SAARB) of the Evandro Chagas Institute (IEC), the National Reference Laboratory for the diagnosis of Arboviruses of the Health Surveillance and Environment Secretariat (SVSA) of the Ministry of Health (MS), conducts surveillance and monitoring of arbovirus and other vertebrate virus circulations in different environments, especially in the Northern Region of the country.
Since 2005, IEC has been developing studies in the southeastern region of Pará, covering the municipalities of Marabá, Parauapebas, Curionopolis, and Canaã dos Carajás. These studies aim to assess the impact of mining activities on the emergence and re-emergence of arbovirosis and other endemic tropical diseases in the region, especially those with vectorial transmission.
In this context, WNV was isolated for the first time in the southeastern region of Pará. It was isolated from a pool of 40 mosquitoes of the genus Culex (Mel.). The specimens were collected in March 2017 in the Municipality of Canaã dos Carajás/PA (S6°26′33.61″/W50°10′54.35″) (Figure 1). The RT-qPCR technique for WNV confirmed the arthropod infection, followed by genomic sequencing of the virus using the IIIumina platform.

2.2. Capture and Identification of Hematophagous Arthropods

Two methods were used to collect hematophagous arthropods, the human-protected attraction technique [31] and the CDC light trap, both in the canopy and on the ground.
The technique of human attraction consists of collecting the mosquitoes that approach the professional, using equipment such as the puçá and the oral suction catcher, before the mosquito begins to hemophagy [31]. CDC light traps consist of an automatic trap that uses light to attract arthropods, and a fan that sucks them into a collection cup attached to the unit [32,33,34,35,36].
After collection, arthropods were placed in cryotubes, stored in liquid nitrogen (~196 °C), and transported to the SAARB Medical Entomology Laboratory (IEC/PA), where they were transferred to a −70 °C freezer. Taxonomic identification was performed.

2.3. Viral Isolation in Cell Culture and Indirect Immunofluorescence Test (IIF)

For virus isolation assays, 1000µL of Dulbecco’s buffered saline solution (DPBS) (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 2% penicillin and streptomycin, 1% fungizone, and 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) was added to the arthropod pools. The samples were macerated in a TissueLyser II equipment (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and stored in a −70 °C freezer for a minimum of 24 h, in accordance with the protocol of Vazeille et al. [37].
The samples were inoculated into C6/36 (ATCC: CRL-1660) and VERO (ATCC: CCL-81-VHG™) cell cultures [38], according to the protocol of Igarashi [39]. For inoculation, 100 µL of the supernatant was inoculated into each cell line after thawing and centrifugation (Mikro 220R, Hettich, Föhrenstr, Tuttlingen, Germany). The C6/36 cells were incubated at 28 °C (±2 °C) and the VERO cells were incubated at 37 °C (±2 °C) with 5% CO2 for one hour for adsorption. Based on the protocol of Beaty, Calisher, and Shope [40], 1.5 mL of Leibowitz L-15 medium (GIBCO, GRAND ISLAND, NY, USA) was added to the C6/36 cells and 1.5 mL of 199 medium (GIBCO, GRAND ISLAND, NY, USA) to the VERO cells.
To verify the presence of the cytopathogenic effect (CPE), the respective cell line was observed daily under an inverted optical microscope (Olympus CK2 Phase Contrast Microscope, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan) for seven days. To make the test more reliable, positive and negative controls were used during the process.
The indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFI) using polyclonal antibodies to the genus Alphavirus, Flavivirus, and Orthobunyavirus was performed for serologic identification, according to the protocol of Gubler [41].

2.4. Viral Isolation in Swiss Albino Mice

The sample was also analyzed by a viral isolation technique in neonatal mice, based on the protocol established by Rosa et al. [42], in which 0.02 mL of the arthropod macerate supernatant diluted 1:10 in 0.75% bovine albumin in PBS was individually inoculated intracerebrally into six two-to-three day-old Swiss albino infant mice. The animals were observed for signs and symptoms of infection for 21 days. The animals that showed signs of disease were separated and brain and liver samples were collected to identify the infecting agent using the complement fixation test (CF).

2.5. Complement Fixation Test (CF)

In order to better characterize and detect the immune response of the viral isolate (viral typing), the complement fixation test was performed. The test was performed by centrifuging the inoculated C6/36 cells for 15 min at 8000 rpm and diluting the pure cell culture 1:2 in Veronal buffer (1:5) according to the protocol developed by Fulton and Dumbell [43] and adapted for plates by Beaty, Calisher, and Shope [40]. Polyclonal sera were then prepared at 1:8, 1:16, and 1:32 dilutions in Veronal (1:5) and inactivated at 60 °C for 20 min. In a 96-well microplate, 25 µL of tested sera, 50 µL of 1:100 diluted complement system (guinea pig serum complement), and 25 µL cell culture suspension were added per well and incubated overnight at 4 °C.
The hemolytic system (developer system) was prepared using equal parts of sheep cells diluted 1:40 in Veronal (1:5) and hemolysin (rabbit anti-sheep cell serum) diluted 1:700 after sensitization in a 37 °C water bath for 20 min. Then, 50 µL of the developer system was added to each well, followed by shaking and incubation at 37 °C. Then, 50 µL of the developer system was added to each well, followed by incubation at 37 °C. Microplates were shaken at intervals of 7, 8, and 15 min, followed by incubation in a refrigerator at 4 °C for at least 4 h.
The results of the test were based on the degree of hemolysis, assigning values from 0 to 4 according to the percentage of hemolysis observed (Table 1).

2.6. Molecular Detection and Bioinformatics Analysis

To confirm the isolated flavivirus, RNA extraction was performed using 140 µL of C6/36 cell culture supernatant from sample BeAr848804 for nucleic acid extraction using commercial QlAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit and RT-qPCR for WNV and Saint Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV), according to the protocol established by Lanciotti et al. [44], in the ABI7500 Real Time PCR System Equipment (Applied Biosystems) using the Superscript III Platinum One-Step qRT-PCR System Kit (Invitrogen). The choice of both viruses was made because the Culex spp. mosquitoes are considered to be the main vectors of both viruses.
The RNA extracted in the preview step was used for the preparation of cDNA started with synthesis of first and second strand cDNA using the SuperScript™ VILO™ MasterMix Kit and NEBNext® Second Strand Synthesis Module, respectively. The PureLink® PCR Purification Kit was used for cDNA purification. All of the steps were performed according to the respective kit manufacturer’s recommendations.
The genomic library was prepared according to the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit guidelines and sequenced on the Miniseq platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) using the MiniSeq High Output Kit v2.5 (300 cycles) using the paired-end method according to the manufacturer’s recommendations at the IEC SAARB, MS/ SVSA, Brazil.
Raw data were processed using Trim Galore v.0.4.5 to remove short reads (<50 nt), adapters, and undetermined bases (reads with more than 15 of N) (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/ (accessed on 19 January 2021). The reads were assembled using the De Novo Assembly method in IDBA-UD v.1.1 [45], and SPAdes v.3.12.0 [46] to obtain contigs, and the generated data were curated in Geneious 9.1.6 (Biomatters Inc., Auckland, New Zealand).
Genomic annotation of the assemblies was performed using the program DIAMOND [47] together with the non-redundant protein database available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), considering the e-value (0.0001) and amino acid identity values.
Phylogenetic inference was performed from WNV strain nucleotide sequences available in the NCBI database using polyprotein coding regions.
Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) was performed using Mafft v.7 [48]. The jModelTest program was used to select the best nucleotide substitution model before performing the phylogenetic analysis [49]. The maximum likelihood (ML) method [50] was used to reconstruct the phylogenetic tree, implemented in RaxML v.8.2.4 [51]. To determine the reliability of the tree topology, bootstrap analysis [52] was performed with 1000 replicates. Phylogeny visualization was performed in FigTree v.1.4.4 (https://github.com/rambaut/figtree/releases/tag/v1.4.4 (accessed on 19 January 2021) and edited in Inkscape v.1.1 (https://inkscape.org/release/inkscape-1.1/ (accessed on 19 January 2021).

3. Results

In the study area, located in the municipality of Canaã dos Carajás/PA, a total of 4615 arthropods were collected. Of these, 422 (9.14%) were Cetaropogonidae, 1035 (22.43%) were Psychodidae, and 3158 (68.43%) were Culicidae (Table 2).
For the genus Culex spp. from which WNV was isolated, 2136 (67.64%) mosquitoes belonging to the genus were collected. However, only 125 specimens were identified in terms of species, being Culex (Cux) coronator, and the others were identified only to the genus. CDC in the ground was the collection method that captured a greater number of specimens (Figure 2).
In an arthropod pool (BeAr848804) of Culex (Mel.) mosquitoes, CPE was observed in the VERO and C6/36 cell lines. Cellular changes in C6/36 cells began at 4 dpi with the formation of syncytia, i.e., multinucleated giant cells, and disruption of the monolayer. Vero cells showed changes in their monolayer from 5 dpi, with changes in cell morphology and disruption of the monolayer (Figure 3). The IFI test showed reactivity with polyclonal antibodies to the genus Flavivirus (group B) in both of the cell lines used (Figure 4).
In viral isolation assays in mice, clinical signs of infection were observed from day 11 post infection (dpi), and to increase viral titers, a passage in new mice was carried out in which animals showed clinical signs from day 4 dpi.
In CF, the sample was positive for polyclonal antigen group B antibodies with serologic cross-referencing to WNV and Rocio virus (ROCV) (Table 3). This sample was positive for WNV with a Ct of 9.69 in the RT-qPCR test for WNV and negative to SLEV.
The genome of the West Nile virus was sequenced, and the complete open reading frame (ORF) of the WNV strain (identified by sequence ID OP422646) was successfully recovered (Supplementary Materials). Phylogenetic analysis showed that this new isolate, similar to the other WNV strains already identified in Brazil, was also grouped in the clade belonging to lineage 1a and was closer to other WNV isolates detected in horses in the State of Espírito Santo in 2018 and 2019 within the same monophyletic clade (Figure 5A), as well as to other strains detected in the US, Mexico, Colombia, and Argentina. However, paraphilia was observed with other samples from Brazil. These were isolated from horses in the states of Piauí, Minas Gerais, and São Paulo (Figure 5B).
Comparison of the nonsynonymous mutations among the isolates from Brazil identified residues (M336I, H1262Y, M2166V, V2259M, and M2518V) that were common only to samples BeAr848804, MH643887, and MT905060 strains, whereas samples MW420987, MW420988, and MW420989 shared a single mutation at position S1839F (Figure 5C).

4. Discussion

In Brazil, until 2013, WNV circulation was only detected by serological methods in the samples from several species, including horses and domestic chickens, and was first detected in humans in 2014, in Piauí State. However, the first isolation of WNV occurred in 2018, from an adult horse sample from Espírito Santo State [18,53,54,55,56].
West Nile surveillance in Brazil consists of continuous monitoring of wild and domestic birds and horses with clinical signs of neurological disease or unexplained death, and arthropod surveillance to identify potential vectors of the virus in the country [20]. From this surveillance, new cases of WNV-positive horses with signs of neurological disease in the states of Espírito Santo, Ceará, and São Paulo were identified through genomic studies conducted in 2019 [19,57,58]. Therefore, animal surveillance actions that can participate in the virus transmission cycle are extremely important, as they contribute to the detection of virus circulation in these animals and help to define the areas and populations that are at risk, thus aiming for prevention and control actions.
This paper reports the first isolation of WNV in an arthropod in Brazil, which is directly related to the transmission cycle of this arbovirus in the country. In the analysis of the behavior of the isolate in C6/36 cells, we observed the formation of syncytia by the fusion of plasma membranes of adjacent cells, resulting in the sharing of luminal contents and the formation of multinuclear cells, this behavior is characteristic of enveloped viruses such as WNV [59]. Enveloped viruses are characterized by the expression of proteins that mediate the fusion of the viral envelope with the membrane of the target cells. These proteins are called fusogenic proteins. These proteins are synthesized during the viral replication cycle and are found in the viral envelope and in the cell membranes of infected cells. They adhere to new viral particles during budding. The presence of such proteins promotes cell− fusion, resulting in syncytia formation [60,61,62].
Despite the geographical distance between the locations where the strains were isolated, the isolated strain BeAr848804 is phylogenetically close to the two equine strains from Espírito Santo isolated in 2018 and 2019, forming a monophyletic clade with each other and sharing amino acid mutations, and is part of lineage 1a of WNV, as are the other strains already sequenced in the country. These three strains line up far from three other strains that also circulate in Brazil, in the states of Piauí, Minas Gerais, and São Paulo, forming a divergent paraphyletic clado. The isolate BeAr848804 also aligned closely to the WNV strain isolated in Culex nigripalpus (GenBank: DQ983578) in the state of Florida (USA), showing 99% bootstrap value reliability.
Lineage 1 is subdivided into three clades (1a, 1b, and 1c). Clade 1a is found mainly in European, African, Middle Eastern, and American countries. Clade 1b is found in Australia and clade 1c in India [63,64,65].
WNV is maintained in nature in a transmission cycle involving mainly Culex mosquitoes [66]. WNV has been detected in 27 mosquito species in the United States, including Aedes, Anopheles, Coquillettidia, Deinocerites, Mansonia, Orthopodomyia, Uranotaenia, Culiseta, and Psorophora, and 14 species of Culex, including Culex quinquefasciatus, according to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [67].
Ciota [68] reported that the main WNV transmission cycle is an enzootic cycle between mosquitoes of the genus Culex spp. acting as vectors and birds as amplifying hosts in field and experimental studies conducted in Egypt since 1950. It is important to note that the potential of these mosquitoes to transmit WNV, which qualifies them as a vector, is directly related to two factors, vector competence and vector capacity, both of which refer to the feeding behavior and ability of the mosquito to transmit the virus by hematophagy.
In 2020, two pools of Culex pipiens mosquitoes in the Netherlands tested positive for WNV RNA. Genomic analysis of the samples showed that the strain circulating in the region belonged to lineage 2, grouping with sequences from Germany, Austria and the Czech Republic [69]. In 2021, WNV was identified in a pool of Culex pipiens complex mosquitoes that had been collected in Rosslau, Germany [70].
In North America, Culex mosquitoes are the primary vectors of the virus, and patterns of WNV transmission and infection risk are determined by geographic distribution, ecology, and vector capacity [71].
The presence of humans in forested areas, which is considered a terminal host, is another important aspect of the transmission cycle of arboviruses such as WNV. In the region of the Carajás Mineral Complex, various anthropic activities, such as mining, agriculture, and cattle raising, bring people into constant contact with arbovirus vectors, and may also attract them from the forest to urban or peri-urban dwellings. This causes wild vectors to become synanthropic, that is, to adapt to living in areas with humans, which favors the transmission of wild circulation arboviruses in urban areas [72,73].
Thus, environmental changes have great influence on the emergence and proliferation of various diseases, among them, deforestation stands out as the activity that most generates environmental modification, being carried out for the practice of agriculture, timber extraction, road construction, and mining. Such environmental changes also cause disease vectors to change their feeding behavior from predominantly zoophilic to anthropophilic [74,75,76].

5. Conclusions

Data from the present study provided the first evidence of isolation and genome sequencing of WNV in Culex spp. collected in the municipality of Canaã dos Carajás, Pará, Brazil. This isolate, as well as other isolates previously described in Brazil, was clustered in lineage 1a. In this context, it is important to adopt measures to expand and strengthen entomovirological surveillance as a diagnostic tool for detecting and monitoring arboviruses, as well as identifying other arthropod species that may be vectors of WNV transmission in Brazilian territory.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/tropicalmed8040237/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C.M., E.V.P.d.S. and J.P.N.N.; methodology, M.N.O.F., B.L.S.d.N., L.L.d.C., H.H.M.d.C., J.C.P.R. and C.M.B.; formal analysis, S.P.S., L.A.M.R. and H.H.M.d.C.; investigation, H.H.M.d.C., B.L.S.d.N. and J.P.N.N.; resources, J.P.N.N., L.C.M. and E.V.P.d.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.A.M.R., H.H.M.d.C., S.P.S. and L.L.d.C.; writing—review and editing, L.A.M.R., J.P.N.N., S.P.S. and L.C.M.; supervision, L.C.M.; funding acquisition, L.C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by VALE S.A. from the agreement signed between VALE S.A. and the Evandro Chagas Institute (IEC) for the development of the project “Evaluation of environmental and social changes and their influence on the nosological picture in the areas of influence of the S11D project”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Committee for Ethics in the Use of Animals of the Instituto Evandro Chagas (CEUA/IEC) under protocol nº 006/2014, certificate nº 010/2014, of 14 May 2014.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

To the technical workers of the Medical Entomology, Cell Culture, Serology and Molecular Biology laboratories of the Arbovirology and Hemorrhagic Fevers Section (SAARB) of the Evandro Chagas Institute (IEC), for their contributions in the collection, transport and processing of the analyzed samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Colpitts, T.M.; Conway, M.J.; Montgomery, R.R.; Fikrig, E. West Nile Virus: Biology, Transmission, and Human Infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 25, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Duguma, D.; Rueda, L.M.; Debboun, M. Mosquito-Borne Diseases. In Mosquitoes, Communities, and Public Health in Texas; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 319–337. ISBN 9780128145456. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kulasekera, V.L.; Kramer, L.; Nasci, R.S.; Mostashari, F.; Cherry, B.; Trock, S.C.; Glaser, C.; Miller, J.R. West Nile Virus Infection in Mosquitoes, Birds, Horses, and Humans, Staten Island, New York, 2000. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001, 7, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fall, G.; Di Paola, N.; Faye, M.; Dia, M.; Freire, C.C.d.M.; Loucoubar, C.; Zanotto, P.M.D.A.; Faye, O.; Sall, A.A. Biological and Phylogenetic Characteristics of West African Lineages of West Nile Virus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0006078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kuno, G.; Chang, G.-J.J.; Tsuchiya, K.R.; Karabatsos, N.; Cropp, C.B. Phylogeny of the Genus Flavivirus. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Campbell, G.L.; Marfin, A.A.; Lanciotti, R.S.; Gubler, D.J. West Nile Virus. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2002, 2, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Eidson, M.; Komar, N.; Sorhage, F.; Nelson, R.; Talbot, T.; Mostashari, F.; McLean, R.; Group, W.N.V.A.M.S. Crow Deaths as a Sentinel Surveillance System for West Nile Virus in the Northeastern United States, 1999. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001, 7, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Watson, J.T.; Pertel, P.E.; Jones, R.C.; Siston, A.M.; Paul, W.S.; Austin, C.C.; Gerber, S.I. Clinical Characteristics and Functional Outcomes of West Nile Fever. Ann. Intern. Med. 2004, 141, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lindsay, N.P.; Staples, J.E.; Lehman, J.A.; Ficher, M. Surveillance for Human West Nile Virus Disease—United Stated, 1999–2008. Morbibity Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2010, 59, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  10. Nash, D.; Mostashari, F.; Fine, A.; Miller, J.; O’Leary, D.; Murray, K.; Huang, A.; Rosenberg, A.; Greenberg, A.; Sherman, M.; et al. The Outbreak of West Nile Virus Infection in the New York City Area in 1999. N. Engl. J. Med 2001, 344, 1807–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nolan, M.S.; Schuermann, J.; Murray, K.O. West Nile Virus Infection among Humans, Texas, USA, 2002–2011. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Solomon, T.; Ooi, M.H.; Beasley, D.W.C.; Mallewa, M. West Nile Encephalitis. BMJ 2003, 326, 865–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Giordano, B.V.; Kaur, S.; Hunter, F.F. West Nile Virus in Ontario, Canada: A Twelve-Year Analysis of Human Case Prevalence, Mosquito Surveillance, and Climate Data. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Deardorff, E.; Estrada-Franco, J.G.; Brault, A.C.; Navarro-Lopez, R.; Campomanes-Cortes, A.; Paz-Ramirez, P.; Solis-Hernandez, M.; Ramey, W.N.; Davis, C.T.; Beasley, D.W.C.; et al. Introductions of West Nile Virus Strains to Mexico. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Estrada-Franco, J.G.; Navarro-Lopez, R.; Beasley, D.W.C.; Coffey, L.; Carrara, A.S.; Da Rosa, A.T.; Clements, T.; Wang, E.; Ludwig, G.V.; Campomanes Cortes, A.; et al. West Nile Virus in Mexico: Evidence of Widespread Circulation since July 2002. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. World Health Organization West Nile Virus. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/west-nile-virus (accessed on 20 June 2022).
  17. Vieira, M.A.C.S.; Romano, A.P.M.; Borba, A.S.; Silva, E.V.P.; Chiang, J.O.; Eulálio, K.D.; Azevedo, R.S.S.; Rodrigues, S.G.; Almeida-Neto, W.S.; Vasconcelos, P.F.C. Case Report: West Nile Virus Encephalitis: The First Human Case Recorded in Brazil. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 93, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Martins, L.C.; Da Silva, E.V.P.; Casseb, L.M.N.; Da Silva, S.P.; Cruz, A.C.R.; De Sousa Pantoja, J.A.; De Almeida Medeiros, D.B.; Filho, A.J.M.; Da Cruz, E.D.R.M.; De Araújo, M.T.F.; et al. First Isolation of West Nile Virus in Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2019, 114, 180332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chalhoub, F.L.L.; Maia de Queiroz-Júnior, E.; Holanda Duarte, B.; Eielson Pinheiro de Sá, M.; Cerqueira Lima, P.; Carneiro de Oliveira, A.; Medeiros Neves Casseb, L.; Leal Das Chagas, L.; Antônio de Oliveira Monteiro, H.; Sebastião Alberto Santos Neves, M.; et al. West Nile Virus in the State of Ceará, Northeast Brazil. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Boletim Epidemiológico Vol. 52—No 40; Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde: Brasília, Brazil, 2021. Available online: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/boletins/epidemiologicos/edicoes/2021/boletim_epidemiologico_svs_40.pdf/view (accessed on 5 March 2023).
  21. Harbach, R.E. Culex Pipiens: Species versus Species Complex Taxonomic History and Perspective. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 2012, 28, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Harbach, R.E. The Culicidae (Diptera): A Review of Taxonomy, Classification and Phylogeny. Zootaxa 2007, 1668, 591–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ciota, A.T.; Kramer, L.D. Vector-Virus Interactions and Transmission Dynamics of West Nile Virus. Viruses 2013, 5, 3021–3047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Laporta, G.Z.; Urbinatti, P.R.; Natal, D. Aspectos Ecológicos Da População de Culex Quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera, Culicidae) Em Abrigos Situados No Parque Ecológico Do Tietê, São Paulo, SP. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2006, 50, 125–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zittra, C.; Flechl, E.; Kothmayer, M.; Vitecek, S.; Rossiter, H.; Zechmeister, T.; Fuehrer, H.P. Ecological Characterization and Molecular Differentiation of Culex Pipiens Complex Taxa and Culex Torrentium in Eastern Austria. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Barcellos, C.; Miguel, A.; Monteiro, V.; Corvalán, C.; Gurgel, H.C.; Carvalho, M.S.; Artaxo, P.; Hacon, S.; Ragoni, V. Mudanças Climáticas e Ambientais e as Doenças Infecciosas: Cenários e Incertezas Para o Brasil. Epidemiol. Serviços Saúde 2009, 18, 285–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lopes, N.; Nozawa, C.; Linhares, R.E.C. Características Gerais e Epidemiologia Dos Arbovírus Emergentes No Brasil. Rev. Pan-Amazônica Saúde 2014, 5, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mesquita, T.C.R.; Rosa, A.P.; Borges, A.C. Mudanças Climáticas e Seu Impacto Na Incidência de Arboviroses: Uma Revisão Sistemática de Estudos Recentes. Rev. Bras. Geogr. Física 2021, 14, 3361–3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ossa, D.P.S.; Melo, H.P.; Arouca, K.L.D.; Baldoino, F.R.R.; de Oliveira, E.M.; Silva, V.P.; Lopes, P.F.; de Andrade, A.R.O.; Garcês, T.C.D.C.S. Arbovírus Circulantes No Brasil: Fatores Associados Com a Disseminação e Estratégias Terapêuticas. Rev. Eletrônica Acervo Saúde 2019, 33, e1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Prophiro, J.S. Arboviroses e Mudanças Climáticas. Rev. Gestão Sustentabilidade Ambient. 2022, 11, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  31. Brasil; Ministério da Saúde; Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde; Departamento de Imunização e Doenças Transmissíveis. Guia Para o Planejamento Das Ações de Captura de Anofelinos Pela Técnica de Atração Por Humano Protegido (TAHP) e Acompanhamento Dos Riscos à Saúde Do Profissional Capturador, 1st ed.; Galardo, A.K.R., Costa, C., Lima, J.B.P., Sallum, M.A.M., Póvoa, M.M., Oliveira, R.L., Nakaoka, R.T., Coelho, R.R., Santos, R.L.C., Eds.; Ministério da Saúde: Brasília, Brazil, 2021; Volume 1, ISBN 978-65-5993-022-7. [Google Scholar]
  32. Cardoso, J.D.C. Vigilância Entomológica de Mosquitos (Diptera, Culicidae) Como Estratégia de Vigilância Ambiental Em Saúde No Rio Grande Do Sul, Brasil; Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Universidade de São Paulo: São Paulo, Brazil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chaves, L.S.M. Eficácia de Três Tipos de Armadilhas Para Captura de Culicídeos Em Área de Mata Atlântica No Sudeste Do Brasil; Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Universidade de São Paulo: São Paulo, Brazil, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  34. Degefa, T.; Yewhalaw, D.; Zhou, G.; Atieli, H.; Githeko, A.K.; Yan, G. Evaluation of Human-Baited Double Net Trap and Human-Odour-Baited CDC Light Trap for Outdoor Host-Seeking Malaria Vector Surveillance in Kenya and Ethiopia. Malar. J. 2020, 19, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hutchings, R.S.G.; Hutchings, R.W.; Menezes, I.S.; Sallum, M.A.M. Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) From the Southwestern Brazilian Amazon: Liberdade and Gregório Rivers. J. Med. Entomol. 2020, 57, 1793–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sudia, W.D.; Chamberlain, R.W. Battery-Operated Light Trap, an Improved Model. Mosq. News. 1962, 22, 126–129. [Google Scholar]
  37. Vazeille, M.; Mousson, L.; Martin, E.; Failloux, A.B. Orally Co-Infected Aedes Albopictus from La Reunion Island, Indian Ocean, Can Deliver Both Dengue and Chikungunya Infectious Viral Particles in Their Saliva. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wilson, D.E.; Reeder, D.M. Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 3rd ed.; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2005; Volume 1, ISBN 978-0801882210. [Google Scholar]
  39. Igarashi, A. Isolation of a Singh’s Aedes Albopictus Cell Clone Sensitive to Dengue and Chikungunya Viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 1978, 40, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Beaty, B.J.; Calisher, C.H.; Shope, R.E. Arboviruses. In Diagnostic Procedures for viral Rickettsial and Chlamydial infections; Schmidt, N.J., Lennette, D.A., Lennette, E.T., Lennette, E.H., Emmons, R.W., Eds.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1995; pp. 189–212. ISBN 0875532209. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gubler, F. Immunofluorescence Localisation of Microtubules in Plant Root Tips Embedded in Butyl-Methyl Methacrylate. Cell Biol. Int. Rep. 1989, 13, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rosa, A.P.d.A.T.d.; da Rosa, E.S.T.; da Rosa, J.F.S.T.; Dégallier, N.; Vasconcelos, P.F.d.C.; Rodrigues, S.G.; Cruz, A.C.R. Os Arbovírus No Brasil: Generalidades, Métodos e Técnicas de Estudo: Documento Técnico No 2, 1st ed.; Instituto Evandro Chagas: Belém, Brazil, 1998; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  43. Fulton, F.; Dumbell, K.R. The Serological Comparison of Strains of Influenza Virus. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1949, 3, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lanciotti, R.S.; Kerst, A.J.; Nasci, R.S.; Godsey, M.S.; Mitchell, C.J.; Savage, H.M.; Komar, N.; Panella, N.A.; Allen, B.C.; Volpe, K.E.; et al. Rapid Detection of West Nile Virus from Human Clinical Specimens, Field-Collected Mosquitoes, and Avian Samples by a TaqMan Reverse Transcriptase-PCR Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 4066–4071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Peng, Y.; Leung, H.C.M.; Yiu, S.M.; Chin, F.Y.L. IDBA-UD: A de Novo Assembler for Single-Cell and Metagenomic Sequencing Data with Highly Uneven Depth. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1420–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and Its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Buchfink, B.; Xie, C.; Huson, D.H. Fast and Sensitive Protein Alignment Using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 59–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. JModelTest 2: More Models, New Heuristics and Parallel Computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guindon, S.; Dufayard, J.F.; Lefort, V.; Anisimova, M.; Hordijk, W.; Gascuel, O. New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Stamatakis, A. RAxML Version 8: A Tool for Phylogenetic Analysis and Post-Analysis of Large Phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Felsenstein, J. Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Brasil; Ministério da Saúde; Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Capítulo 6—Febre Do Nilo Ocidental. In Guia de Vigilância em Saúde: Volume único; Oliveira, W.K., Rohlfs, D.B., Macário, E.M., Pereira, G.F.M., Croda, J.H., Brito, S.M.F., Eds.; Ministério da Saúde: Brasília, Brazil, 2019; Volume 1, pp. 389–400. ISBN 978-85-334-2706-8. [Google Scholar]
  54. Melandri, V.; Guimarães, A.É.; Komar, N.; Nogueira, M.L.; Mondini, A.; Fernandez-Sesma, A.; Alencar, J.; Bosch, I. Serological Detection of West Nile Virus in Horses and Chicken from Pantanal, Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2012, 107, 1073–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ometto, T.; Durigon, E.L.; de Araujo, J.; Aprelon, R.; de Aguiar, D.M.; Cavalcante, G.T.; Melo, R.M.; Levi, J.E.; de Azevedo Júnior, S.M.; Petry, M.V.; et al. West Nile Virus Surveillance, Brazil, 2008-2010. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2013, 107, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Silva, J.R.; de Medeiros, L.C.; dos Reis, V.P.; Chávez, J.H.; Munhoz, T.D.; Borges, G.P.; Soares, O.A.B.; de Campos, C.H.C.; Machado, R.Z.; Baldani, C.D.; et al. Serologic Survey of West Nile Virus in Horses from Central-West, Northeast and Southeast Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2013, 108, 921–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. De Siqueira, R.F.; Hansen, V.S.; de Fátima Monteiro Martins, M.; do Rêgo Leal, M.L.; Bondan, E.F. West Nile Fever Virus Infection in Horses in São Paulo State, Brazil. Acta Sci. Vet. 2022, 50, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Siconelli, M.J.L.; Jorge, D.M.d.M.; de Castro-Jorge, L.A.; Fonseca-Júnior, A.A.; Nascimento, M.L.; Floriano, V.G.; de Souza, F.R.; de Queiroz-Júnior, E.M.; Camargos, M.F.; Costa, E.D.L.; et al. Evidence for Current Circulation of an Ancient West Nile Virus Strain (NY99) in Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2021, 54, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Simmonds, P.; Becher, P.; Bukh, J.; Gould, E.A.; Meyers, G.; Monath, T.; Muerhoff, S.; Pletnev, A.; Rico-Hesse, R.; Smith, D.B.; et al. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Flaviviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 2–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hernández, J.M.; Podbilewicz, B. The Hallmarks of Cell-Cell Fusion. Development 2017, 144, 4481–4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Podbilewicz, B. Virus and Cell Fusion Mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014, 30, 111–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Brukman, N.G.; Uygur, B.; Podbilewicz, B.; Chernomordik, L.V. How Cells Fuse. J. Cell Biol. 2019, 218, 1436–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bakonyi, T.; Hubálek, Z.; Rudolf, I.; Nowotny, N. Novel Flavivirus or New Lineage of West Nile Virus, Central Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sejvar, J.J.; Fischer, M. West Nile Virus Infection. Viral Infections of the Human Nervous System; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2013; pp. 237–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. The Center for Food Security & Public Health (CFSPH). West Nile Virus Infection. Cent. Food Secur. Public Health 2013, 1, 19. [Google Scholar]
  66. Barrett, A.D.T. West Nile in Europe: An Increasing Public Health Problem. J. Travel Med. 2018, 25, tay096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention—CDC West Nile Virus: Mosquito Control. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/westnile/vectorcontrol/index.html (accessed on 18 November 2022).
  68. Ciota, A.T. West Nile Virus and Its Vectors. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2017, 22, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sikkema, R.S.; Schrama, M.; Van Den Berg, T.; Morren, J.; Munger, E.; Krol, L.; Van DerBeek, J.G.; Blom, R.; Chestakova, I.; Van Der Linden, A.; et al. Detection of West Nile Virus in a Common Whitethroat (Curruca Communis) and Culex Mosquitoes in the Netherlands, 2020. Eurosurveillance 2020, 25, 2001704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kampen, H.; Tews, B.A.; Werner, D. First Evidence of West Nile Virus Overwintering in Mosquitoes in Germany. Viruses 2021, 13, 2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rochlin, I.; Faraji, A.; Healy, K.; Andreadis, T.G. West Nile Virus Mosquito Vectors in North America. J. Med. Entomol. 2019, 56, 1475–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Almeida, L.S.; Costa, A.L.S.; Rodrigues, D.F. Saneamento, Arboviroses e Determinantes Ambientais: Impactos Na Saúde Urbana. Cien. Saude Colet. 2020, 25, 3857–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Degallier, N.; Rosa, A.P.A.T.; Vasconcelos, P.F.C. O Impacto Das Atividades Humanas Na Transmissão Dos Arbovírus Silvestres Na Amazônia Brasileira. Contacto 1994, 6, 31–34. [Google Scholar]
  74. Githeko, A.K.; Lindsay, S.W.; Confalonieri, U.E.; Patz, J.A. Climate Change and Vector-Borne Diseases: A Regional Analysis. Bull. World Health Organ. 2000, 78, 1136. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Patz, J.A.; McGeehin, M.A.; Bernard, S.M.; Ebi, K.L.; Epstein, P.R.; Grambsch, A.; Gubler, D.J.; Reiter, P.; Romieu, I.; Rose, J.B.; et al. The Potential Health Impacts of Climate Variability and Change for the United States: Executive Summary of the Report of the Health Sector of the U.S. National Assessment. Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Saccaro, N.L., Jr.; Mation, L.F.; Sakowski, P.A.M. Impacto Do Desmatamento Sobre a Incidência de Doenças Na Amazônia, 1st ed.; Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA): Brasília, Brazil, 2015; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
Tropicalmed 08 00237 g001 550
Figure 1. Location of the municipality of Canaã dos Carajás (outlined in orange) and the arthropod collection site (red dot).
Figure 1. Location of the municipality of Canaã dos Carajás (outlined in orange) and the arthropod collection site (red dot).
Tropicalmed 08 00237 g001
Tropicalmed 08 00237 g002 550
Figure 2. Distribution of the total number of Culex arthropods collected, according to the type of collection.
Figure 2. Distribution of the total number of Culex arthropods collected, according to the type of collection.
Tropicalmed 08 00237 g002
Tropicalmed 08 00237 g003 550
Figure 3. Cytopathic effect (ECP) displayed by C6/36 and Vero cell lines inoculated with sample BeAr848894. (a) ECP in C6/36 cells showing formation of syncytium highlighted by red arrows. (b) ECP in Vero cells, with modification in the cell morphology and destruction of the monolayer. (c) negative control C6/36 cells, showing intact monolayer and normal cell morphology. (d) Negative control Vero cells, showing intact monolayer and normal cell morphology.
Figure 3. Cytopathic effect (ECP) displayed by C6/36 and Vero cell lines inoculated with sample BeAr848894. (a) ECP in C6/36 cells showing formation of syncytium highlighted by red arrows. (b) ECP in Vero cells, with modification in the cell morphology and destruction of the monolayer. (c) negative control C6/36 cells, showing intact monolayer and normal cell morphology. (d) Negative control Vero cells, showing intact monolayer and normal cell morphology.
Tropicalmed 08 00237 g003
Tropicalmed 08 00237 g004 550
Figure 4. Indirect immunofluorescence reaction (IFI) using polyclonal antibody to Flavivirus. (a) C6/36 cells with positive fluorescence reaction. (b) Vero cells with a positive fluorescence reaction. (c) Negative control C6/36 cells, with cells demarcated using Evans blue staining. (d) Negative control Vero cells, showing no fluorescence reaction.
Figure 4. Indirect immunofluorescence reaction (IFI) using polyclonal antibody to Flavivirus. (a) C6/36 cells with positive fluorescence reaction. (b) Vero cells with a positive fluorescence reaction. (c) Negative control C6/36 cells, with cells demarcated using Evans blue staining. (d) Negative control Vero cells, showing no fluorescence reaction.
Tropicalmed 08 00237 g004
Tropicalmed 08 00237 g005 550
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of different WNV strains, including an isolate obtained from mosquitoes of the genus Culex spp. in Brazil. (A) Using the maximum likelihood (ML) method based on the complete nucleotide sequences of the polyprotein and using the GTR matrix as the best model for nucleotide substitution. Phylogenetic lineages are labeled in different clade colors. The numbers at each main node of the tree correspond to the bootstrap values in percent (1000 replicates). The scale bar corresponds to the nucleotide divergence per site between sequences. Highlighted in blue are the strains identified in Brazil. (B) Monophyletic clade of different strains 1a including those from Brazil. (C) Aminoacidic alignment of the polyprotein including only the non-synonymous mutations.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of different WNV strains, including an isolate obtained from mosquitoes of the genus Culex spp. in Brazil. (A) Using the maximum likelihood (ML) method based on the complete nucleotide sequences of the polyprotein and using the GTR matrix as the best model for nucleotide substitution. Phylogenetic lineages are labeled in different clade colors. The numbers at each main node of the tree correspond to the bootstrap values in percent (1000 replicates). The scale bar corresponds to the nucleotide divergence per site between sequences. Highlighted in blue are the strains identified in Brazil. (B) Monophyletic clade of different strains 1a including those from Brazil. (C) Aminoacidic alignment of the polyprotein including only the non-synonymous mutations.
Tropicalmed 08 00237 g005
Table
Table 1. Reference values for complement fixation test reading.
Table 1. Reference values for complement fixation test reading.
Degree of Hemolysis (%)Reaction ResultTest Value
0%Positive (+)4
25%Positive (+)3
50%Negative (−)2
75%Negative (−)1
100%Negative (−)0
Table
Table 2. Distribution of species collected from human attraction and CDC techniques, at Brejeira Farm, Canãa dos Carajás, March 2017.
Table 2. Distribution of species collected from human attraction and CDC techniques, at Brejeira Farm, Canãa dos Carajás, March 2017.
Collection ModalitiesGroundTreetopCDC GroundCDC TreetopTotalPercent
SpeciesNºPoolsNºPoolsNºPoolsNºPoolsNºPools%
Ae. (Stg.) albopictus51000000510.16
Ae. (How.) species11000000110.03
Ae. (Och.) species710071001420.44
Ae. (Och.) fulvus16100191113631.14
Ae. (Och.) scapularis229110034141267138.45
Ae. (Och.) serratus2810061003421.08
An. (Ano.) species00003100310.1
An. (Ano.) intermedius0000131111420.44
An. (Ano.) mediopunctatus2100121001420.44
An. (Nys.) species11001111330.1
An. (Nys.) nuneztovari00001100110.03
An. (Nys.) triannulatus00001100110.03
Cq. (Rhy.) species11003100420.13
Cq. (Rhy.) albicosta00001100110.03
Cq. (Rhy.) venezuelensis00003100310.1
Cx. (Cux.) species69200945263351013493842.72
Cx. (Cux.) coronator191009937112553.96
Cx. (Mel.) species1110064619516622120.96
Hg. (Hag.) janthinomys11510000620.19
Li. species21000000210.06
Li. durhamii61000000610.19
Li. flavisetosus51000000510.16
Ma. (Man.) species00003200320.1
Ma. (Man.) titillans8100111011930.6
Ps. species11000011220.06
Ps. (Gra.) species00007100710.22
Ps. (Jan.) species130600410013474.24
Ps. (Jan.) albipes6127191117852.47
Ps. (Jan.) ferox125511410013074.12
Ps. (Jan.) lutzii3110071003821.2
Ps. (Pso.) species00001100110.03
Sa. (Sab.) belisarioi1111100001220.38
Sa. (Sab.) tarsopus00210000210.06
Sa. (Sbo.) chloropterus00810000810.25
Sa. (Sbo.) glaucodaemon00410000410.13
Ur. (Ura.) calosomata000010030010033.17
Wy. species6321100006432.03
Total of Culicidae82346398193073366193158146100%
% Culicidae 68.43%
Ceratopogonidae13010020518714223
% Ceratopogonidae 9.14%
Flebotominae ♀0000394435437487
Flebotominae ♂0000147114012872
Psychodidae00005415494410359
% Psychodidae 22.43%
Grand total95347398267679947244615158100%
Table
Table 3. Values referring to the degree of hemolysis of sample BeAr848804 (C6/36) in the complement fixation test (CF).
Table 3. Values referring to the degree of hemolysis of sample BeAr848804 (C6/36) in the complement fixation test (CF).
FlavivírusWNVROCV
Diluition816328163281632
Pure443442444
1/2431432444
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Neto, J.P.N.; Reis, L.A.M.; Freitas, M.N.O.; do Nascimento, B.L.S.; das Chagas, L.L.; da Costa, H.H.M.; Rodrigues, J.C.P.; Braga, C.M.; da Silva, E.V.P.; Silva, S.P.; et al. First Isolation and Genome Sequence Analysis of West Nile Virus in Mosquitoes in Brazil. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8040237

AMA Style

Neto JPN, Reis LAM, Freitas MNO, do Nascimento BLS, das Chagas LL, da Costa HHM, Rodrigues JCP, Braga CM, da Silva EVP, Silva SP, et al. First Isolation and Genome Sequence Analysis of West Nile Virus in Mosquitoes in Brazil. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2023; 8(4):237. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8040237

Chicago/Turabian Style

Neto, Joaquim Pinto Nunes, Lúcia Aline Moura Reis, Maria Nazaré Oliveira Freitas, Bruna Laís Sena do Nascimento, Liliane Leal das Chagas, Hernan Hermes Monteiro da Costa, Jéssica Cecília Pinheiro Rodrigues, Camila Margalho Braga, Eliana Vieira Pinto da Silva, Sandro Patroca Silva, and et al. 2023. "First Isolation and Genome Sequence Analysis of West Nile Virus in Mosquitoes in Brazil" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 8, no. 4: 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8040237

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop