Next Article in Journal
‘Know Your Epidemic’: Are Prisons a Potential Barrier to TB Elimination in an Australian Context?
Next Article in Special Issue
Onchodermatitis: Where Are We Now?
Previous Article in Journal
Melioidosis in Hong Kong
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Teledermatology Pilot Programme for the Management of Skin Diseases in Primary Health Care Centres: Experiences from a Resource-Limited Country (Mali, West Africa)
Article Menu

Export Article

Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2018, 3(3), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed3030092

Review
Advances in the Treatment of Yaws
Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
Received: 31 July 2018 / Accepted: 27 August 2018 / Published: 29 August 2018

Abstract

:
Yaws is one of the three endemic treponematoses and is recognised by the World Health Organization as a neglected tropical disease. Yaws is currently reported in 15 countries in the Pacific, South-East Asia, West and Central Africa, predominantly affects children, and results in destructive lesions of the skin and soft tissues. For most of the twentieth century penicillin-based treatment was the standard of care and resistance to penicillin has still not been described. Recently, oral azithromycin has been shown to be an effective treatment for yaws, facilitating renewed yaws eradication efforts. Resistance to azithromycin is an emerging threat and close surveillance will be required as yaws eradication efforts are scaled up globally.
Keywords:
yaws; Treponema pallidum

1. Introduction

Yaws, caused by Treponema pallidum subsp. pertenue, is one of the three endemic treponematoses (along with T.p. subsp. endemicum, the causative agent of bejel, and T. carateum, the causative agent of pinta) and is recognised by the World Health Organization as a neglected tropical disease (NTD) [1,2]. The disease predominantly affects children and results in destructive lesions of the skin and soft tissues. Yaws is still found in Africa, South-East Asia and the Pacific. T.p. subsp. pertenue is closely related to T.p. subsp. pallidum, the causative agent of syphilis [3] but neither sexual nor mother-to-child transmission of yaws is believed to occur [2].

2. Epidemiology

Yaws is currently reported in 15 countries in the Pacific, South-East Asia, West and Central Africa [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Currently the most cases are reported in Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands and Ghana and all have reported in excess of 15,000 cases in recent years. In the mid-twentieth century, yaws was endemic in South America and the Caribbean, but control programmes in the mid-twentieth century (see below) are believed to have eliminated yaws from the majority of countries in the region [10,11]. India interrupted transmission in 2004 and declared elimination in 2006 [12] following a sustained programme that began in 1996.
Yaws is restricted to warm and humid environments [13]. Transmission is skin to skin contact from active infectious lesions [14]. Early studies had suggested that flies may play a role in transmission but there is no definitive proof that this occurs [14,15,16]. The majority of active infections cases occur in children aged under 15 years. Closely-related treponemal infections have been identified in primate populations, but zoonotic transmission to humans has not been established [17,18].

3. Clinical Features

As with other treponemal infections, yaws is characterized by a multi-stage disease process predominantly involving skin, bones and cartilage.
The initial stage of primary yaws is the development of an erythematous lesion that occurs at the site of inoculation after an incubation period of 9–90 days [14,19]. These lesions may break down forming an ulcerated plaque over a period of 1–2 weeks. Primary lesions occur most frequently on the lower limbs or buttocks [13,20], whilst genital lesions are extremely uncommon. If patients are left untreated then primary lesions will heal spontaneously, with scarring, over a period of 3–6 months [21].
Without treatment individuals will progress to secondary yaws. Secondary yaws predominantly involves the skin and bones [20,22]. As with secondary syphilis, both generalised lymphadenopathy and constitutional symptoms, including fever and malaise, are frequently reported in patients with secondary yaws [19]. A wide-range of skin manifestations occur in secondary yaws including macular lesions and hyperkeratotic lesions on the palms and soles (‘crab yaws’) [14,19,20]. Osteoperiostitis, affecting the fingers (resulting in dactylitis) or long bones (forearm, fibula, tibula) is the most common bony manifestation of secondary yaws. Following treatment of early yaws (primary or secondary) skin lesions usually resolve within 2–4 weeks and bone pain may start to resolve in as little as 48 h [23].
In the absence of treatment of early yaws, patients go on to develop latent infection. During this clinical stage of disease patients have reactive serology but no clinical evidence of infection. Relapse from latent to active disease can occur for a period of up to 5–10 years and serve as a source of onward transmission. Previously up to 10% of patients were reported to develop the late-stage manifestations of tertiary yaws, but this is now much less commonly reported [19]. Tertiary disease may manifest as gummatous nodules resulting in tissue necrosis, a destructive osteitis which can cause destruction of the maxilla (gangosa), or bowing of the shins (sabre shin), or a hypertrophic periostitis causing exostosis of the paranasal maxilla (gondou).
Clinical diagnosis is supported by serological testing. Diagnostic testing combines a treponemal assay (such as the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay) and a non-treponemal assay (such as the rapid plasma regain assay). Treponemal tests are more specific but remain positive for life. The titre of non-treponemal assays rises following infection and falls following treatment. A four-fold fall in titre (e.g., from 1:16 to 1:4) is considered consistent with serological cure. Newer point-of-care treponemal and non-treponemal assays have increasingly taken on the role of traditional lab-based assays [24,25].
An important recent discovery has been the finding that Haemophilus ducreyi may cause ulcerative skin lesions similar to those seen in patients with early yaws [26,27]. H. ducreyi may cause lesions in both patients who have non-reactive and reactive serological tests for yaws, which complicates assessment of patients with suspected active yaws as serological point of care tests cannot be used to accurately provide a definitive diagnosis. When molecular tests are used, a large proportion of patients suspected to have active early yaws are found in fact to have latent yaws (reactive serological tests) and a different cause for the current skin lesion.

4. Penicillin-Based Treatment

Early studies conducted in Haiti demonstrated that penicillin-based treatments were highly efficacious in the treatment of yaws [23] and penicillin-based therapy was subsequently adopted as the standard of care worldwide for all endemic treponematoses [14]. Different penicillin-based regimes are effective for the treatment of yaws, but long-acting intramuscular benzathine benzylpenicillin was the most commonly used regimen. Lower doses were used than those recommended for the treatment of venereal syphilis (1.2 million units for the treatment of adults and 0.6 million units for the treatment of children) [14]. Although there have been rare reports of ‘treatment failure’ with penicillin-based therapy, the inability to distinguish treatment failure from reinfection makes these data extremely difficult to interpret, especially in highly endemic settings [28]. As with syphilis, no evidence of penicillin resistance has developed in yaws despite it being the first-line treatment for more than 50 years.
During the mid-twentieth century, successful treatment campaigns were conducted targeting yaws and the other endemic treponematoses [29]. In 1949, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution supporting efforts for the control and elimination of the endemic treponematoses, including yaws. WHO and UNICEF led a global effort between 1952 and 1964, based on penicillin treatment. At the time, the recommended strategy varied, based on the prevalence of active yaws in the community (Table 1). Although not ultimately successful in achieving eradication, the programme did significantly reduce the global prevalence of yaws by as much as 98% [30]. Following these efforts, the incidence of the disease rebounded in a number of countries in the 1970s, ultimately leading to a further World Health Assembly resolution in 1978, which resulted in some countries renewing control efforts [29].

5. Azithromycin-Based Treatment

Despite its efficacy, treatment with penicillin remains challenging in many settings. Injectable penicillin requires access to a secure cold chain and trained staff to administer therapy, both of which are not always available in the remote locations where yaws is found. Treatment also carried a small but important risk of anaphylaxis. Supplies of benzathine benzylpenicillin have also been insecure in recent years [31], with implications for reliable access to treatment.
Azithromycin, an oral macrolide antibiotic, had previously been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of syphilis [32] with cure rates equivalent to those of benzathine benzylpenicillin. Given the high degree of genetic homology between syphilis and yaws, azithromycin was an attractive option for study as an alternative treatment for yaws. In a landmark study conducted in Papua New Guinea, patients with early (primary and secondary) yaws were randomised to receive treatment with either a single dose of intramuscular benzathine benzylpenicillin or a single, oral dose of azithromycin. Azithromycin was shown to be non-inferior to benzathine benzylpenicillin with a cure rate greater than 95% in both arms [33]. Subsequently, a study conducted in Ghana also confirmed the non-inferiority of azithromycin compared to benzathine benzylpenicillin [34].
These initial studies all enrolled patients with early active yaws and used a dose of 30 mg/kg (max. 2 g). Two outstanding questions were whether azithromycin was effective for the treatment of latent infection and whether the lower dose of azithromycin used for the treatment of trachoma (20 mg/kg—max. 1 g) was also efficacious in the treatment of yaws. In a longitudinal cohort study in Papua New Guinea, treatment with azithromycin was demonstrated to have a cure rate for patients with latent yaws equivalent to the cure rate of patients with active yaws [35]. The efficacy of the low versus standard dose azithromycin was compared in a randomised control trial in patients with both early active and latent yaws, conducted in Papua New Guinea and Ghana. The clinical cure rate was equivalent in both low and standard dose arms. The serological cure rate in patients with active yaws was slightly lower in the low-dose arm. In patients with latent yaws the serological cure rate was equivalent with both doses of azithromycin [36]. Taken together with observational data, this suggests that low-dose azithromycin is also effective in the treatment of yaws, although the 30 mg/kg dose remains the standard of care.
Unlike with penicillin, resistance to azithromycin is well described in T. pallidum. Resistance is mediated by one of two mutations in the 23s rDNA and can be detected by specific molecular tests [37,38,39,40,41]. In the context of large scale azithromycin-based treatment programmes (see below), treatment failure and genotypic resistance to azithromycin has now also been described in yaws [42].

6. Community Treatment with Azithromycin

Azithromycin has been widely distributed at the community level for the treatment of trachoma [43] and the WHO recommends mass drug administration (MDA) of azithromycin for the elimination of trachoma as a public health problem as part of the SAFE (Surgery, Antibiotics, Facial cleanliness and Environmental improvement) strategy [44]. MDA of azithromycin has been shown to be safe and indeed there is considerable evidence that MDA may result in significant off-target benefits including reductions in child mortality [45].
Taken together, the evidence of the safety of MDA with azithromycin and the efficacy of azithromycin for the treatment of yaws provide the rationale behind the revised WHO strategy for the eradication of yaws (the Morges strategy). This strategy emphasises MDA of azithromycin in communities where yaws is endemic. Following an initial round of MDA (referred to as total community treatment—TCT) it may be appropriate to conduct further MDA or to switch to a strategy of treating active cases and their contacts (total targeted treatment—TTT) [46]. No clear evidence currently exists to guide the decision regarding when to switch between TCT and TTT, but modelling studies suggest that TCT is a preferable strategy because it ensures a higher coverage of latent yaws cases [47,48].
Initial assessments of the efficacy of azithromycin MDA were conducted in both the Pacific and West Africa. In a study in the Solomon Islands, communities received a single round of MDA of azithromycin (conducted for the elimination of trachoma as a public health problem) at a dose of 20 mg/kg (max. 1g) and were followed up at 6 and 18 months following MDA [49,50,51]. A significant reduction in the prevalence of both active and latent yaws was seen at both 6 and 18 months following MDA. In Ghana, MDA with azithromycin (30 mg/kg, max. 2 g) was conducted in a single district and follow-up conducted at 12 months. As in the Solomon Islands, a significant reduction in both active and latent yaws was documented [52].
The most comprehensive evaluation of the WHO Morges strategy was conducted in Lihir, Papua New Guinea [53]. In this study of more than 15,000 individuals, an initial round of mass treatment was undertaken, followed by six-monthly rounds of surveillance and treatment of new cases and their contacts. In keeping with the studies discussed above, this study demonstrated a marked reduction in the prevalence of both active and latent yaws. Despite this initial success, interruption of transmission was not achieved [42]. Ongoing transmission was driven both by cases imported from outside the study site and cases arising in individuals missed during the initial mass treatment phase of the study. Thirty-six months into the study, a single case of treatment failure was detected. The patient had been treated at 30 months with azithromycin but at month 36 had clinical evidence of progression and serological evidence of treatment failure. Subsequent molecular testing confirmed genotypic azithromycin resistance in this case. Alongside the index case, several contacts were detected at month 36 and month 42 of the study with azithromycin-resistant yaws. Although subsequent treatment with benzathine benzylpenicillin was used to successfully ring-fence the outbreak, these data highlight the risk of emerging azithromycin resistance threatening yaws eradication efforts [42].

7. Conclusions

There has been considerable progress in the treatment of yaws in the last decade. Azithromycin has emerged as an effective and easily deliverable oral treatment option that can be used to treat both individual cases and during community MDA. The emergence of azithromycin resistance highlights the need for ongoing surveillance to support yaws eradication efforts globally. Further studies are needed to better define the optimum MDA strategy including the number of rounds and population coverage required to interrupt the transmission of yaws.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Marks, M.; Solomon, A.W.; Mabey, D.C. Endemic treponemal diseases. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2014, 108, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  2. Mitjà, O.; Asiedu, K.; Mabey, D. Yaws. Lancet 2013, 381, 763–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cejková, D.; Zobaníková, M.; Chen, L.; Pospíšilová, P.; Strouhal, M.; Qin, M.; Mikalová, L.; Norris, S.J.; Muzny, D.M.; Gibbs, R.A.; et al. Whole genome sequences of three Treponema pallidum ssp. pertenue strains: Yaws and syphilis treponemes differ in less than 0.2% of the genome sequence. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1471. [Google Scholar]
  4. Agadzi, V.K.; Aboagye-Atta, Y.; Nelson, J.W.; Perine, P.L.; Hopkins, D.R. Resurgence of yaws in Ghana. Lancet 1983, 2, 389–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Asiedu, K. The return of yaws. Bull. World Health Organ. 2008, 86, 507–508. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Tharmaphornpilas, P.; Srivanichakorn, S.; Phraesrisakul, N. Recurrence of yaws outbreak in Thailand, 1990. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 1994, 25, 152–156. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Fegan, D.; Glennon, M.; Macbride-Stewart, G.; Moore, T. Yaws in the Solomon Islands. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1990, 93, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Fegan, D.; Glennon, M.J.; Thami, Y.; Pakoa, G. Resurgence of yaws in Tanna, Vanuatu: Time for a new approach? Trop. Doct. 2010, 40, 68–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Manning, L.A.; Ogle, G.D. Yaws in the periurban settlements of Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea. Papua New Guinea Med. J. 2002, 45, 206–212. [Google Scholar]
  10. John, R.K.S. Yaws in the Americas. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1985, 7, S266–S272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Scolnik, D.; Aronson, L.; Lovinsky, R.; Toledano, K.; Glazier, R.; Eisenstadt, J.; Eisenberg, P.; Wilcox, L.; Rowsell, R.; Sliverman, M. Efficacy of a targeted, oral penicillin-based yaws control program among children living in rural South America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 36, 1232–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bora, D.; Dhariwal, A.C.; Lal, S. Yaws and its eradication in India—A brief review. J. Commun. Dis. 2005, 37, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Hackett, C.J. Extent and nature of the yaws problem in Africa. Bull. World Health Organ. 1953, 8, 127–182. [Google Scholar]
  14. Perine, P.L.; Hopkins, D.R.; Niemel, P.L.A.; St.-John, R.; Causse, G.; Antal, G.M. Handbook of Endemic Treponematoses: Yaws, Endemic Syphilis and Pinta; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1984; Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/37178?locale=en (accessed on 2 May 2013).
  15. Houinei, W.; Godornes, C.; Kapa, A.; Knauf, S.; Mooring, E.Q.; González-Beiras, C.; Watup, R.; Paru, R.; Advent, P.; Bieb, S.; et al. Haemophilus ducreyi DNA is detectable on the skin of asymptomatic children, flies and fomites in villages of Papua New Guinea. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0004958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Knauf, S.; Raphael, J.; Mitjà, O.; Lejora, I.A.V.; Chuma, I.S.; Batamuzi, E.K.; Keyyu, J.D.; Fyumagwa, R.; Lüert, S.; Godornes, C.; et al. Isolation of Treponema DNA from necrophagous flies in a natural ecosystem. EBioMedicine 2016, 11, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Harper, K.N.; Fyumagwa, R.D.; Hoare, R.; Wambura, P.N.; Coppenhaver, D.H.; Sapolsky, R.M.; Alberts, S.C.; Tung, J.; Rogers, J.; Kilewo, M.; et al. Treponema pallidum infection in the wild baboons of East Africa: Distribution and genetic characterization of the strains responsible. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Knauf, S.; Liu, H.; Harper, K.N. Treponemal infection in nonhuman primates as possible reservoir for human yaws. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 2058–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Koff, A.B.; Rosen, T. Nonvenereal treponematoses: Yaws, endemic syphilis, and pinta. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1993, 29, 519–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mitjà, O.; Hays, R.; Lelngei, F.; Laban, N.; Ipai, A.; Pakarui, S.; Bassat, Q. Challenges in recognition and diagnosis of yaws in children in Papua New Guinea. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2011, 85, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sehgal, V.N. Leg ulcers caused by yaws and endemic syphilis. Clin. Dermatol. 1990, 8, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mitjà, O.; Hays, R.; Ipai, A.; Wau, B.; Bassat, Q. Osteoperiostitis in early yaws: Case series and literature review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 52, 771–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rein, C.R. Treatment of yaws in the Haitian peasant. J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 1949, 41, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Marks, M.; Goncalves, A.; Vahi, V.; Sakana, O.; Puiahi, E.; Zhang, Z.; Dalipanda, T.; Bottomley, C.; Mabey, D.; Solomin, A.W. Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test for yaws infection in a community surveillance setting. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ayove, T.; Houniei, W.; Wangnapi, R.; Bieb, S.V.; Kazadi, W.; Luke, L.N.; Manineng, C.; Moses, P.; Paru, R.; Esfandiari, J.; et al. Sensitivity and specificity of a rapid point-of-care test for active yaws: A comparative study. Lancet Glob. Health 2014, 2, e415–e421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Marks, M.; Chi, K.H.; Vahi, V.; Pillay, N.; Sokana, O.; Pavluck, A.; Mabey, D.C.; Chen, C.Y.; Solomon, A.W. Haemophilus ducreyi associated with skin ulcers among children, Solomon Islands. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1705–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mitjà, O.; Lukehart, S.A.; Pokowas, G.; Moses, P.; Kapa, A.; Godones, C.; Robson, J.; Cherian, S.; Houinei, W.; Kazadi, W.; et al. Haemophilus ducreyi as a cause of skin ulcers in children from a yaws-endemic area of Papua New Guinea: A prospective cohort study. Lancet Glob. Health 2014, 2, e235–e241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Backhouse, J.L.; Hudson, B.J.; Hamilton, P.A.; Nesteroff, S.I. Failure of penicillin treatment of yaws on Karkar Island, Papua New Guinea. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1998, 59, 388–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Asiedu, K.; Amouzou, B.; Dhariwal, A.; Karam, M.; Lobo, D.; Patnaik, S.; Meheus, A. Yaws eradication: Past efforts and future perspectives. Bull. World Health Organ. 2008, 86, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Antal, G.M.; Causse, G. The control of endemic treponematoses. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1985, 7, S220–S226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Nurse-Findlay, S.; Taylor, M.M.; Savage, M.; Mello, M.B.; Saliyou, S.; Lavayen, S.; Seghers, F.; Campbell, M.L.; Birgirimana, F.; Ouedraogo, L.; et al. Shortages of benzathine penicillin for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of syphilis: An evaluation from multi-country surveys and stakeholder interviews. PLoS Med. 2017, 14, e1002473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Riedner, G.; Rusizoka, M.; Todd, J.; Maboko, L.; Hoelscher, M.; Mmbando, D.; Samky, E.; Lyamuya, E.; Mabey, D.; Grosskurth, H.; et al. Single-dose azithromycin versus penicillin G benzathine for the treatment of early syphilis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 1236–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mitjà, O.; Hays, R.; Ipai, A.; Penias, M.; Paru, R.; Fagaho, D.; Lazzari, E.; Bassat, Q. Single-dose azithromycin versus benzathine benzylpenicillin for treatment of yaws in children in Papua New Guinea: An open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial. Lancet 2012, 379, 342–347. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kwakye-Maclean, C.; Agana, N.; Gyapong, J.; Nortey, P.; Adu-Sarkodie, Y.; Aryee, E.; Asiedu, K.; Ballard, R.; Binka, F. A single dose oral azithromycin versus intramuscular benzathine penicillin for the treatment of yaws—A randomized non-inferiority trial in Ghana. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mitjà, O.; González-Beiras, C.; Godornes, C.; Kolmau, R.; Houinei, W.; Abel, H.; Kapa, A.; Paru, A.; Bieb, S.V.; Wangi, J.; et al. Effectiveness of single-dose azithromycin to treat latent yaws: A longitudinal comparative cohort study. Lancet Glob. Health 2017, 5, e1268–e1274. [Google Scholar]
  36. Marks, M.; Mitjà, O.; Bottomley, C.; Kwakye, C.; Houinei, W.; Bauri, M.; Adwere, P.; Abdulai, A.A.; Dua, F.; Boateng, L.; et al. Comparative efficacy of low-dose versus standard-dose azithromycin for patients with yaws: A randomised non-inferiority trial in Ghana and Papua New Guinea. Lancet Glob. Health 2018, 6, e401–e410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Grimes, M.; Sahi, S.K.; Godornes, B.C.; Tantalo, L.C.; Roberts, N.; Bostick, D.; Marra, C.M.; Lukehart, S.A. Two mutations associated with macrolide resistance in Treponema pallidum: Increasing prevalence and correlation with molecular strain type in Seattle, Washington. Sex Transm. Dis. 2012, 39, 954–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lukehart, S.A.; Godornes, C.; Molini, B.J.; Sonnett, P.; Hopkins, S.; Mulcahy, F.; Engelman, J.; Mitchell, S.J.; Rompalo, A.M.; Marra, C.M.; et al. Macrolide resistance in Treponema pallidum in the United States and Ireland. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chen, C.Y.; Chi, K.H.; Pillay, A.; Nachamkin, E.; Su, J.R.; Ballard, R.C. Detection of the A2058G and A2059G 23S rRNA gene point mutations associated with azithromycin resistance in Treponema pallidum by use of a TaqMan real-time multiplex PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 908–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Šmajs, D.; Paštěková, L.; Grillová, L. Macrolide resistance in the syphilis spirochete, Treponema pallidum ssp. pallidum: Can we also expect macrolide-resistant yaws strains? Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 93, 678–683. [Google Scholar]
  41. Šmajs, D.; Pospíšilová, P. Macrolide resistance in yaws. Lancet 2018, 391, 1555–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mitjà, O.; Godornes, C.; Houinei, W.; Kapa, A.; Paru, R.; Abel, H.; González-Beiras, C.; Bieb, S.V.; Wangi, J.; Barry, A.E.; et al. Re-emergence of yaws after single mass azithromycin treatment followed by targeted treatment: A longitudinal study. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2018, 391, 1599–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Solomon, A.W.; Holland, M.J.; Alexander, N.D.E.; Massae, P.A.; Aguirre, A.; Natividad-Sancho, A.; Molina, S.; Safari, S.; Shao, J.F.; Courtright, P.; et al. Mass treatment with single-dose azithromycin for trachoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 1962–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Emerson, P.M.; Burton, M.J.; Solomon, A.W.; Bailey, R.; Mabey, D.C. The SAFE strategy for trachoma control: Using operational research for policy, and implementation. Bull. World Health Organ. 2006, 84, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Keenan, J.D.; Bailey, R.L.; West, S.K.; Arzika, A.M.; Hart, J.; Weaver, J.; Kalua, K.; Mrango, Z.; Ray, K.J.; Cook, C.; et al. Azithromycin to reduce childhood mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 1583–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. The World Health Organization. Eradication of yaws—The Morges Strategy. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 2012, 87, 189–194. [Google Scholar]
  47. Marks, M.; Mitjà, O.; Fitzpatrick, C.; Asiedu, K.; Solomon, A.W.; Mabey, D.C.; Funk, S. Mathematical modeling of programmatic requirements for yaws eradication. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dyson, L.; Marks, M.; Crook, O.M.; Sokana, O.; Solomon, A.W.; Bishop, A.; Mabey, D.C.W.; Hollingsworth, T.D. Targeted treatment of yaws with household contact tracing: How much do we miss? Am. J. Epidemiol. 2018, 187, 837–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Marks, M.; Vahi, V.; Sokana, O.; Puiahi, E.; Pavluck, A.; Zhang, Z.; Dalipanda, T.; Bottomley, C.; Mabey, D.C.; Solomon, A.W. Mapping the epidemiology of yaws in the Solomon Islands: A cluster randomized survey. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 92, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Marks, M.; Vahi, V.; Sokana, O.; Chi, K.H.; Puiahi, E.; Kilua, G.; Pillay, A.; Dalipanda, T.; Bottomley, C.; Solomon, A.W.; et al. Impact of community mass treatment with azithromycin for trachoma elimination on the prevalence of yaws. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Marks, M.; Sokanam, O.; Nachamkin, E.; Puiahi, E.; Kilua, G.; Pillay, A.; Bottomley, C.; Solomon, A.W.; Mabey, D.C. Prevalence of active and latent yaws in the Solomon Islands 18 months after azithromycin mass drug administration for trachoma. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Abdulai, A.A.; Agana-Nsiire, P.; Biney, F.; Kwakye-Maclea, C.; Kyei-Faried, S.; Amponsa-Achiano, K.; Simpson, S.V.; Bonsu, G.; Ohene, S.A.; Ampofo, W.K.; et al. Community-based mass treatment with azithromycin for the elimination of yaws in Ghana—Results of a pilot study. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Mitjà, O.; Houinei, W.; Moses, P.; Kapa, A.; Paru, R.; Hays, R.; Lukehart, S.; Godornes, C.; Bieb, S.V.; Grice, T.; Siba, P.; et al. Mass treatment with single-dose azithromycin for yaws. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 703–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Historical strategy for the eradication of yaws: 1952–1964.
Table 1. Historical strategy for the eradication of yaws: 1952–1964.
Prevalence of Clinically Active YawsTreatment Strategy
Hyperendemic: above 10%Benzathine benzylpenicillin to the whole community
(total mass treatment)
Mesoendemic: 5–10%Treat all active cases, all children under 15 and all contacts of infectious cases
(juvenile mass treatment)
Hypoendemic: under 5%Treat all active cases and all household and other contacts
(selective mass treatment)

© 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. EISSN 2414-6366 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top