Next Article in Journal
Heading in the Right Direction? Investigating Walkability in Galway City, Ireland
Next Article in Special Issue
Prioritization of Local Indicators for the Development of an Age-Friendly City: A Community Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Leptospirosis and Extensive Urbanization in West Africa: A Neglected and Underestimated Threat?
Article Menu
Issue 2 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Urban Sci. 2018, 2(2), 30;

Implementing Healthy Planning and Active Living Initiatives: A Virtuous Cycle

Curtin University Sustainability Policy (CUSP) Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 25 February 2018 / Revised: 12 March 2018 / Accepted: 19 March 2018 / Published: 23 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Future Cities: Concept, Planning, and Practice)
Full-Text   |   PDF [297 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]


Factors including internal local government functioning, collaboration and the use of co-benefits have been noted to assist in the uptake of healthy planning policies and projects by local governments. However, less commonly noted is a possible reverse relationship: that implementation of healthy planning projects can contribute positively to organisational functioning and collaboration, and can result in a range of co-benefits that then can be used to support projects. Such a concept is explored in this paper, with a focus at the local government level in Australia. Findings from surveys with local government practitioners and in-depth interviews with healthy planning and community health advocates are presented. The findings indicate four key areas through which the implementation of healthy planning policies and projects and active living initiatives demonstrates a ‘virtuous cycle’. These areas include (1) project ‘wind-up’, or circumstances in which implementation and/or health outcomes exceed initial expectations; (2) improved partnerships that can create opportunities for future initiatives; (3) improved internal organisational functioning; and (4) greater project sustainability. The paper concludes by exploring some possible repercussions of these emerging findings, which indicate that beneficial settings to healthy planning considerations can be a result of as well as a contributor to healthy planning and active living initiative implementation. In turn, this presents another potential co-benefit of project uptake and implementation to those commonly identified. View Full-Text
Keywords: planning; health; active living; co-benefits; virtuous cycle; Australia; local government planning; health; active living; co-benefits; virtuous cycle; Australia; local government
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

McCosker, A.; Matan, A.; Marinova, D. Implementing Healthy Planning and Active Living Initiatives: A Virtuous Cycle. Urban Sci. 2018, 2, 30.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Urban Sci. EISSN 2413-8851 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top