Next Article in Journal
A Space Fractional Uphill Dispersion in Traffic Flow Model with Solutions by the Trial Equation Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Testing Road Vehicle User Interfaces Concerning the Driver’s Cognitive Load
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Optimization of 3D Printed Rapid Prototype Deep Drawing Tools for Automotive and Railway Sheet Material Testing
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Quality of Automatic Traffic Volume Counting by Cameras and Impact on the Qualitative Indicators of Traffic

Infrastructures 2023, 8(3), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures8030044
by Gëzim Hoxha 1, Arjanit Fandaj 2 and Xhevahir Bajrami 2,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Infrastructures 2023, 8(3), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures8030044
Submission received: 30 January 2023 / Revised: 20 February 2023 / Accepted: 24 February 2023 / Published: 28 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Land Transport, Vehicle and Railway Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The context focused by the manuscript is interesting; however, in the current state, the manuscript is not suitable for publication. From a more general point of view, the manuscript should be rejected; however, if the authors do have intentions to work on in, here are few suggestions that they could consider to follow in order to improve the quality of the manuscript:

  • The Abstract should highlight the results quantitatively,
  • The Introduction should discuss why such study is needed and what the offered contributions are. I suggest the authors to formulate at least a couple of research questions and to highlight the contribution in a clear way,
  • A Related Literature section is needed that should at least provide an overview of related studies. Also, the approach presented in [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107572] could be useful in the context presented by the authors, therefore they could consider citing it.
  • The manuscript needs a better structure. For example, sections are wrongly numbered and they do not frame the content correctly.
  • Algorithms should be referenced in order. The presentation should be improved.

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for the time spent reviewing our manuscript. Your suggestions and comments helped increase the presentation and quality of the manuscript. We have addressed all your recommendation and comments.

 

Thank you again for your time!

Sincerely,

The authors

Reviewer 2 Report

The review report can be seen in the docx file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for the time spent reviewing our manuscript. Your suggestions and comments helped increase the presentation and quality of the manuscript. We have addressed all your recommendation and comments.

Thank you again for your time!

Sincerely,

The authors

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors addressed my concerns.

Back to TopTop