Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.-N.M. and C.O.; methodology, P.-N.M., C.O. and A.F.; validation, P.-N.M., V.P. and N.K.-K.; formal analysis, A.F.; investigation, C.O. and A.F.; resources, P.-N.M.; data curation, A.F. and K.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.F.; writing—review and editing, P.-N.M. and A.F.; visualization, A.F. and C.O.; supervision, P.-N.M.; project administration, P.-N.M.; funding acquisition, P.-N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
(
a) Map of geologic formations of Gavdos [
15]; sampling positions and (
b) colour palette of the samples.
Figure 1.
(
a) Map of geologic formations of Gavdos [
15]; sampling positions and (
b) colour palette of the samples.
Figure 2.
Type of specimens for the laboratory analyses—biscuit, cube, cylindrical specimen.
Figure 2.
Type of specimens for the laboratory analyses—biscuit, cube, cylindrical specimen.
Figure 3.
Type of specimens for the laboratory analyses (a) biscuits, (b) exterior wall surface.
Figure 3.
Type of specimens for the laboratory analyses (a) biscuits, (b) exterior wall surface.
Figure 4.
Specimens used for the UV test.
Figure 4.
Specimens used for the UV test.
Figure 5.
Adhesion test (scotch tape).
Figure 5.
Adhesion test (scotch tape).
Figure 7.
Sponge test (absorption test).
Figure 7.
Sponge test (absorption test).
Figure 8.
Colour change after heat treatment for samples GLK12, GS7, GA3 (upper, left to right), GK8, GB9, GB6 (down, left to right).
Figure 8.
Colour change after heat treatment for samples GLK12, GS7, GA3 (upper, left to right), GK8, GB9, GB6 (down, left to right).
Figure 9.
DTA-TG analysis of GA4, GT5 and GF16.
Figure 9.
DTA-TG analysis of GA4, GT5 and GF16.
Figure 10.
Overview of the analysis process.
Figure 10.
Overview of the analysis process.
Figure 11.
Capillarity water absorption curve.
Figure 11.
Capillarity water absorption curve.
Figure 12.
Diagram of % weight loss during the 15 cycles of salts crystallization.
Figure 12.
Diagram of % weight loss during the 15 cycles of salts crystallization.
Figure 13.
Photographical documentation of the deterioration of specimens (a) 01-GF16 and (b) 01-GT5 during the 15 cycles of salt crystallization.
Figure 13.
Photographical documentation of the deterioration of specimens (a) 01-GF16 and (b) 01-GT5 during the 15 cycles of salt crystallization.
Figure 14.
Study on the existing colour palette of the island and the colour palette developed from earth-based and lime-based mortars.
Figure 14.
Study on the existing colour palette of the island and the colour palette developed from earth-based and lime-based mortars.
Figure 15.
Lime colours on lime plaster: (a) limewater (1:6); (b) limemilk (1:3).
Figure 15.
Lime colours on lime plaster: (a) limewater (1:6); (b) limemilk (1:3).
Figure 16.
Colour difference diagrams for the period of 28 days.
Figure 16.
Colour difference diagrams for the period of 28 days.
Figure 17.
Average colour difference of limecolours with natural stabilizers after 28 days in UV radiation.
Figure 17.
Average colour difference of limecolours with natural stabilizers after 28 days in UV radiation.
Figure 18.
Summary of results for adhesion test for (a) Limemilk and (b) Limewater without stabilizer and with four natural stabilizers.
Figure 18.
Summary of results for adhesion test for (a) Limemilk and (b) Limewater without stabilizer and with four natural stabilizers.
Figure 19.
Summary of results for abrasion test for (a) Limemilk and (b) Limewater with four natural stabilizers.
Figure 19.
Summary of results for abrasion test for (a) Limemilk and (b) Limewater with four natural stabilizers.
Figure 20.
Summary of results for abrasion test based on the clay soil (granulometry < 2 mm).
Figure 20.
Summary of results for abrasion test based on the clay soil (granulometry < 2 mm).
Figure 21.
Summary of results for absorption test for (a) Limemilk and (b) Limewater with four natural stabilizers.
Figure 21.
Summary of results for absorption test for (a) Limemilk and (b) Limewater with four natural stabilizers.
Figure 22.
Results of water vapour transmission test.
Figure 22.
Results of water vapour transmission test.
Table 1.
Proposed mix designs.
Table 1.
Proposed mix designs.
Name | Synthesis |
---|
Lime Putty (% v/v) | NHL 3.5 (% v/v) | Sand (0/4) (% v/v) | Additive (% v/v) |
---|
00-A | 16.4 | - | 73.8 | 9.8 (pozzolan PROLAT, 0–75 μm) |
00-B | 16.4 | - | 73.8 | 9.8 (zeolite Olympos, 0–45 μm) |
01-GF16 | 25 | - | 60 | 15 (GF16 700 °C, 0–2 mm and 0–63 μm) |
01-GT5 | 25 | - | 60 | 15 (GT5 600 °C, 0–2 mm) |
02-GF16 | 18.5 | 7.4 | 66.7 | 7.4 (GF16 700 °C, 0–2 mm) |
Table 2.
Laboratory analyses for proposed mortars.
Table 2.
Laboratory analyses for proposed mortars.
Name of the Test | Type of Specimen | No of Specimens | Curing Time | Standard |
---|
Shrinkage test | Biscuits of 4.5 cm diameter and 1 cm thickness | 1 × 5:5 | 1 week | - |
Uniaxial compressive test | 50 × 50 × 50 (mm) | 3 × 5:15 3 × 5:15 | 28 days and 3 months | - |
Capillary water absorption | Cylindrical specimens 100 mL | 3 × 5:15 | 3 months | UNI-EN 15801:2010 |
Crystallization of salts | Cylindrical specimens 100 mL | 3 × 5:15 | 3 months | ΕΝ 12370 |
Table 3.
Synthesis of limecolours.
Table 3.
Synthesis of limecolours.
Name | Synthesis | Clay Soil (% w/w of Lime) | Stabilizer |
---|
Water (% v/v) | Lime (% v/v) |
---|
A-0 | 75 | 25 | 25 | - |
A-1 | 75 | 25 | 25 | 1% v/v casein |
A-2 | 75 | 25 | 25 | 50 gr potassium alum for 6 L water |
A-3 | 75 * | 25 | 25 | * nopal juice instead of water |
A-4 | 75 | 25 | 25 | 3% v/v linseed oil |
B-0 | 86 | 14 | 65 | - |
B-1 | 86 | 14 | 65 | 1% v/v casein |
B-2 | 86 | 14 | 65 | 50 gr potassium alum for 6 L water |
B-3 | 86 * | 14 | 65 | * nopal juice instead of water |
B-4 | 86 | 14 | 65 | 3% v/v linseed oil |
Table 4.
Laboratory analyses for developed limecolours.
Table 4.
Laboratory analyses for developed limecolours.
Name of the Test | Type of Specimen | No of Specimens | Curing Time | Standard |
---|
UV-colorimeter | Biscuits (4.5 cm) | 3 × 70:210 | - | - |
Adhesion (scotch tape) test | Biscuits (4.5 cm) | 3 × 70:210 | 30 days | - |
Abrasion test | Exterior wall surface | 8 × 7:56 (only syntheses with stabilizers) | 7 days | - |
Sponge test | Exterior wall surface | 30 days | UNI 11432:2011 |
Water vapour transmission (cup method) | Biscuits (4.5 cm) | 5 | 30 days | EN ISO 12572:2016 |
Table 5.
XRF analysis of samples (% w/w).
Table 5.
XRF analysis of samples (% w/w).
XRF | GS7 | GA1 | GA3 | GA4 | GB6 | GB9 | GF16 | GK8 | GLK12 | GT5 |
---|
Mg | 1.15 | 1.08 | 1.31 | 1.40 | 2.89 | 3.40 | 1.89 | 2.14 | 3.19 | 1.13 |
Al | 3.74 | 4.01 | 3.16 | 6.25 | 6.30 | 6.87 | 8.83 | 5.68 | 5.13 | 10.35 |
Si | 10.47 | 18.78 | 8.45 | 19.16 | 17.56 | 18.61 | 20.78 | 16.91 | 14.50 | 21.13 |
Ca | 24.96 | 17.55 | 28.57 | 10.56 | 13.07 | 10.36 | 5.13 | 13.63 | 16.74 | 1.40 |
Fe | 3.10 | 3.54 | 2.09 | 5.41 | 4.52 | 4.74 | 5.74 | 4.53 | 3.61 | 6.27 |
Table 6.
XRD analysis of samples: minerals and quantitative analysis (% w/w).
Table 6.
XRD analysis of samples: minerals and quantitative analysis (% w/w).
XRD | GS7 | GA1 | GA3 | GA4 | GB6 | GB9 | GF16 | GK8 | GLK12 | GT5 |
---|
Quartz | 13.4 | 28.3 | 7.3 | 25.3 | 15.9 | 14.5 | 19.4 | 17.4 | 14.4 | 15.3 |
Calcite | 59.7 | 43.0 | 68.3 | 23.6 | 30.2 | 18.3 | 9.4 | 34.9 | 37.5 | 1.0 |
Illite | 13.3 | 14.7 | 10.3 | 24.0 | 18.7 | 21.8 | 49.0 | 22.6 | 14.9 | 25.8 |
Kaolinite | 4.3 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 8.2 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 8.2 | 6.0 | 2.1 | 50.2 |
Chlorite | 2.6 | 4.3 | 5.4 | 9.6 | 15.2 | 22.4 | 6.8 | 8.0 | 7.3 | 4.9 |
Albite | 6.7 | 5.8 | 5.1 | 9.4 | 15.9 | 13.3 | 7.3 | 11.0 | 7.4 | 2.8 |
Gypsum | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | 6.3 | - | - | 16.4 | - |
Table 7.
Shrinkage percentage.
Table 7.
Shrinkage percentage.
Name | % Shrinkage |
---|
00-A | 2.17 |
00-B | 2.17 |
01-GF16 | 2.17 |
01-GT5 | 3.26 |
02-GF16 | 3.26 |
Table 8.
Compressive strength, Young modulus and Max Deformation for mortars with thermally treated soil from Gavdos (GF16 and GT5) and commercial pozzolanic additives (A and B).
Table 8.
Compressive strength, Young modulus and Max Deformation for mortars with thermally treated soil from Gavdos (GF16 and GT5) and commercial pozzolanic additives (A and B).
Name | Compressive Strength (MPa) | Young Modulus (GPa) | Max Deformation (%) |
---|
00-A 28 days | 0.71 (±0.080) | 0.07 (±0.0007) | 2.0 (±0.00) |
00-A 3 months | 3.50 (±0.063) | 0.42 (±0.135) | 2.0 (±0.00) |
00-B 28 days | 2.29 (±0.081) | 0.40 (±0.075) | 2.0 (±0.00) |
00-B 3 months | 3.16 (±0.247) | 0.23 (±0.076) | 2.7 ( ± 0.01) |
01-GF16 28 days (2 mm) | 0.68 ( ± 0.005) | 0.05 (±0.005) | 3.0 (±0.00) |
01-GF16 28 days (63 μm) | 1.36 (±0.021) | 0.16 (±0.044) | 2.3 (±0.01) |
01-GF16 3 months (63 μm–2 mm) | 1.25 (±0.061) | 0.05 ( ± 0.003) | 4.3 (±0.01) |
01-GT5 28 days | 0.69 (±0.020) | 0.06 (±0.010) | 3.0 (±0.00) |
01-GT5 3 months | 1.30 (±0.006) | 0.07 (±0.009) | 4.0 (±0.00) |
02-GF16 28 days | 0.53 (±0.046) | 0.02 (±0.005) | 4.3 (±0.01) |
02-GF16 3 months | 1.32 (±0.093) | 0.06 (±0.003) | 4.0 (±0.00) |
Table 9.
Average capillarity water absorption coefficient
Table 9.
Average capillarity water absorption coefficient
Name | Capillarity Water Absorption Coefficient (g⁄(cm2 √s)) |
00-A | 0.020 |
00-B | 0.024 |
01-GF16 | 0.020 |
01-GT5 | 0.018 |
02-GF16 | 0.017 |
Table 10.
Average value of percentage weight loss among the sound specimen and the specimen in the end of 15 cycles of salt crystallization.
Table 10.
Average value of percentage weight loss among the sound specimen and the specimen in the end of 15 cycles of salt crystallization.
Name | ΔΒ % |
---|
00-A | −29.65 |
00-B | −34.43 |
01-GF16 | −28.90 |
01-GT5 | −41.93 |
02-GF16 | −22.22 |
Table 11.
Limecolours in CIEL*a*b colour scale.
Table 11.
Limecolours in CIEL*a*b colour scale.
Name of Sample | L* | a* | b* |
---|
GA4-A | 73.18 | 6.50 | 9.12 |
GB6-A | 78.53 | 0.47 | 8.79 |
GB9-A | 75.68 | 0.00 | 4.34 |
GF16-A | 77.89 | 5.43 | 12.96 |
GK8-A | 79.53 | 1.43 | 9.29 |
GS7-A | 85.05 | 1.11 | 8.27 |
GT5-A | 77.94 | 4.48 | 9.91 |
GA4-B | 69.76 | 7.96 | 10.72 |
GB6-B | 77.41 | 0.40 | 9.70 |
GB9-B | 72.95 | −0.20 | 5.09 |
GF16-B | 73.20 | 6.85 | 16.40 |
GK8-B | 84.18 | 1.56 | 12.05 |
GS7-B | 79.57 | 1.79 | 12.19 |
GT5-B | 78.04 | 6.64 | 14.28 |
Table 12.
The colour synthesis with natural stabilizers.
Table 12.
The colour synthesis with natural stabilizers.
Name | Synthesis |
---|
GB9-A-01 | Limemilk-GB9-casein |
GB9-A-02 | Limemilk-GB9-potassium alum |
GB9-A-03 | Limemilk-GB9-nopal juice |
GB9-A-04 | Limemilk-GB9-linseed oil |
GF16-Β-01 | Limewater-GF16-casein |
GF16-Β-02 | Limewater-GF16-potassium alum |
GF16-Β-03 | Limewater-GF16-nopal juice |
GF16-Β-04 | Limewater-GF16-linseed oil |