Next Article in Journal
Review on Computer Aided Sewer Pipeline Defect Detection and Condition Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
A Case Study of BIM Implementation in Rail Track Rehabilitation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pavement Distress Detection Methods: A Review
Article Menu
Issue 1 (March) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Consistency between Infrastructure Rating Systems in Measuring Sustainability

Department of Construction Management, Colorado State University, Campus Delivery 1584, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1584, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Infrastructures 2019, 4(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4010009
Received: 14 November 2018 / Revised: 20 February 2019 / Accepted: 22 February 2019 / Published: 28 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Transportation Infrastructures)
  |  
PDF [915 KB, uploaded 28 February 2019]
  |  

Abstract

To date, several transportation sustainability rating systems (TSRS) have been developed to measure and promote sustainability. However, studies show that these TSRS have not been developed with a consistent sustainability scope. This raises the question of the consistency of these TSRS in measuring the sustainability of transportation projects. This study assesses how three prominent TSRS (Envision, INVEST, and GreenLITES) rate the sustainability performance of transportation projects with the goal of determining if a consistency exists in the way these three TSRS measure sustainability. These three TSRS are applied to five transportation projects. The results showed that these three rating tools assess and reward sustainability practices differently. Additionally, results suggest that it may be easier for a project to get awarded in GreenLITES compared to the other two TSRS. Notwithstanding all of the above, a consistency was noted in all three rating systems in the quality of life/social performance of projects. This study helps to inform stakeholders in the transportation industry on how transportation projects perform when run through each of these rating systems. This will help stakeholders to make informed decisions with respect to choosing one (or more) TSRS to assess their projects with and evaluating the results obtained from such TSRS. View Full-Text
Keywords: transportation sustainability rating system; Envision; INVEST; GreenLITES transportation sustainability rating system; Envision; INVEST; GreenLITES
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Oluwalaiye, O.; Ozbek, M.E. Consistency between Infrastructure Rating Systems in Measuring Sustainability. Infrastructures 2019, 4, 9.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Infrastructures EISSN 2412-3811 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top