Next Article in Journal
Parametric Analysis in the Optimization Design of Composite Cellular Beams
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Study of Modal Curvature and AI-Based Approaches for Vibration-Based Damage Detection in Structural Health Monitoring Systems of Prestressed Concrete Beams
Previous Article in Journal
Rutting Resistance and Fatigue Performance of Crumb Rubber-Modified Asphalt Concrete: Experimental Investigation and Mechanistic–Empirical Modeling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bridge Health Monitoring and Assessment in Industry 5.0: Lessons Learned from Long-Term Real-Time Field Monitoring of Highway Bridges
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Dynamic Response-Based Bridge Monitoring and Structural Assessment: A Structured Scoping Review and Evidence Inventory

Department of Civil, Environmental Engineering and Architecture, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Infrastructures 2026, 11(4), 134; https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11040134
Submission received: 11 February 2026 / Revised: 1 April 2026 / Accepted: 7 April 2026 / Published: 10 April 2026

Abstract

Dynamic response measurements support bridge monitoring and structural assessment because they are obtainable under operational loading and are sensitive to changes in stiffness, boundary conditions, and mass distribution. This article presents a structured scoping review of dynamic-response-based bridge monitoring and assessment. It covers damage-sensitive indicators, stiffness/capacity proxy inference, interpretation under operational and extreme loading, sensing with acquisition (contact, and indirect/drive-by), and data processing, machine learning and digital-twin integration for decision support. Evidence was identified through targeted searches in Scopus and The Lens with duplicate resolution in Zotero. The cited studies are compiled into a traceable evidence inventory linked to method families and decision objectives. The synthesis shows that global modal properties enable change screening but are highly confounded by environmental/operational variability. Localization and state characterization typically require denser or higher-fidelity sensing and signal conditioning. Finally, capacity-related inference using calibrated conversion models or machine learning (ML) surrogates remains context-bounded and validation-dependent. This review provides an end-to-end pipeline, evidence-maturity rubric, and conservative failure-mode checks with escalation logic that tie SHM outputs to inspection and analysis rather than direct condition declarations for bridge owners. This review is intentionally scoped and does not claim PRISMA-style comprehensiveness.
Keywords: bridge structural health monitoring; dynamic response; vibration-based damage detection; modal analysis; machine learning; drive-by monitoring; fibre optic sensing; computer vision; digital twins bridge structural health monitoring; dynamic response; vibration-based damage detection; modal analysis; machine learning; drive-by monitoring; fibre optic sensing; computer vision; digital twins

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bacha, M.Z.; Puppio, M.L.; Zucca, M.; Sassu, M. Dynamic Response-Based Bridge Monitoring and Structural Assessment: A Structured Scoping Review and Evidence Inventory. Infrastructures 2026, 11, 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11040134

AMA Style

Bacha MZ, Puppio ML, Zucca M, Sassu M. Dynamic Response-Based Bridge Monitoring and Structural Assessment: A Structured Scoping Review and Evidence Inventory. Infrastructures. 2026; 11(4):134. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11040134

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bacha, Muhammad Ziad, Mario Lucio Puppio, Marco Zucca, and Mauro Sassu. 2026. "Dynamic Response-Based Bridge Monitoring and Structural Assessment: A Structured Scoping Review and Evidence Inventory" Infrastructures 11, no. 4: 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11040134

APA Style

Bacha, M. Z., Puppio, M. L., Zucca, M., & Sassu, M. (2026). Dynamic Response-Based Bridge Monitoring and Structural Assessment: A Structured Scoping Review and Evidence Inventory. Infrastructures, 11(4), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11040134

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop